1. Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Influencing Patient Care Through Subspecialized Imaging Review
- Author
-
Joanna G. Escalon, Deirdre Sullivan, Bradley B. Pua, Francis Girvin, Stacey Verzosa Weisman, Sharon Steinberger, Dennis Toy, Lauren Groner, Alan C. Legasto, and James F. Gruden
- Subjects
Adult ,Lung Neoplasms ,Humans ,Multiple Pulmonary Nodules ,Solitary Pulmonary Nodule ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Patient Care ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed - Abstract
To evaluate whether thoracic radiologist review of computed tomography-detected incidental pulmonary nodules initially reported by non-thoracic imagers would change management recommendations.The Radiology Consultation Service identified 468 computed tomography scans (one per patient) performed through the adult emergency department from August 2018 through December 2020 that mentioned the presence of a pulmonary nodule. Forty percent (186/468) were read by thoracic radiologists and 60% (282/468) were read by non-thoracic radiologists. The Radiology Consultation Service contacted all patients in order to assess risk factors for lung malignancy. Sixty-seven patients were excluded because they were unreachable, declined participation, or were actively followed by a pulmonologist or oncologist. A thoracic radiologist assessed the nodule and follow up recommendations in all remaining cases.A total of 215 cases were re-reviewed by thoracic radiologists. The thoracic radiologist disagreed with the initial nodule recommendations in 38% (82/215) of cases and agreed in 62% (133/215) of cases. All discordant cases resulted in a change in management by the thoracic radiologist with approximately one-third (33%, 27/82) decreasing imaging utilization and two-thirds (67%, 55/82) increasing imaging utilization. Nodules were deemed benign and follow up eliminated in 11% (9/82) of discordant cases.Our study illustrates that nodule review by thoracic radiologists results in a change in management in a large percentage of patients. Continued research is needed to determine whether subspecialty imaging review results in increased or more timely lung cancer detection.
- Published
- 2022