Search

Various techniques have been developed to optimize the repair of zone II flexor tendon injuries. The aim of the present study was to compare the biomechanical outcomes of four different methods: resection of the single flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) slip; A2 pulley venting; and two different A2 pulley plasty methods. In total, 36 cadaveric fingers were dissected to determine the gliding coefficients (GC), maximum flexion angles (MFA) and bowstring measurements through digital imaging before and after surgical procedures. The GC increased significantly (p < 0.05) and MFA decreased significantly (p < 0.001) in all groups after the surgical interventions. There were no statistically significant differences between the surgical techniques regarding GC (p = 0.756) and MFA (p = 0.089). Bowstring distance significantly increased in the pulley venting group (p < 0.001). The pulley plasty results were comparable to the other techniques. The single FDS slip resection technique should be considered as the method of choice for reducing the GC following flexor tendon repair as it preserves the anatomical structure of the A2 pulley. Level of evidence: V [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Mediterranean Journal of Infection, Microbes & Antimicrobials is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Level of Evidence: V., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Earthquakes are natural disasters that threaten human life and cause loss of life and property in a very short time. In our study, we aim to carry out the medical analysis of the earthquake victims who came to our hospital after the Earthquake in the Aegean Sea and to share our clinical experiences., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients the medical data records of earthquake victims brought to our hospital or the injured who applied due to the Aegean Sea earthquake. Patients demographic data, their complaints and diagnoses, hour of admission, their clinical courses, hospital arrangements (admission, discharge, and transfer), time spent until the operation, anesthesia methods, surgical intervantions, intensive care needs, crush syndrome, presence of acute renal failure, number of dialysis, mortality, and mor-bidity were reviewed., Results: A total of 152 patients were brought to our hospital due to the earthquake. The most intense period of admission to the emergency department was the 1st 24-36 h. Mortality rate was found to be higher depending on the increase of age. While the most common cause of admission for the mortal earthquake survivors was to be trapped in the wreckage, the survivors applied for other reasons as well such as falling down. The most common type of fracture observed in survivors was the lower extremity fractures., Conclusion: Epidemiological studies can make an important contribution to the management and organization of the future earthquake-related injuries by healthcare institutions.