Search

Additional file 2. Statistical analysis plan.

Additional file 6: Figure S2. Laboratory Values. Medians are represented by triangles, with an upward point for Zilucoplan and a downward point for Control, respectively. CRP, C-reactive protein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

Additional file 1. Study protocol.

Additional file 5: Figure S1. Primary Outcome. GeoMean, Geometric Mean; LSGeoMean, Least Square Geometric Means; LSMean, Least Square Means.

Additional file 4. Additional statistical explanation.

Additional file 7: Table S1. Primary and supportive endpoints in the full analysis data set. LSMean, least square mean; PaO2, arterial partial pressure of oxygen; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; PaO2, partial pressure of arterial oxygen; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CRP, C-reactive protein; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation. *Based on the highest temperature in 24 h. Table S2. Follow-up endpoints. SD, standard deviation; DLCO, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide; HRCT, high-resolution computed tomography; WHO, world health organisation. 6-point ordinal scale: 2 on invasive mechanical ventilation; 3 on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen, 6 not hospitalized.

Additional file 3. Overview secondary and exploratory endpoints.

Rationale: Azithromycin prevents acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs); however, its value in the treatment of an AECOPD requiring hospitalization remains to be defined. Objectives: We investigated whether a 3-month intervention with low-dose azithromycin could decrease treatment failure (TF) when initiated at hospital admission and added to standard care. Methods: In an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients who had been hospitalized for an AECOPD and had a smoking history of pack >= 10 years and one or more exacerbations in the previous year were randomized (1:1) within 48 hours of hospital admission to azithromycin or placebo. The study drug (500 mg/d for 3 d) was administered on top of a standardized acute treatment of systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics, and subsequently continued for 3 months (250 mg/2 d). The patients were followed for 6 months thereafter. Time-to-first-event analyses evaluated the TF rate within 3 months as a novel primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population, with TF defined as the composite of treatment intensification with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, a step-up in hospital care or readmission for respiratory reasons, or allcause mortality. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 301 patients were randomized to azithromycin (n = 147) or placebo (n = 154). The TF rate within 3 months was 49% in the azithromycin group and 60% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 073; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.01; P = 0.0526). Treatment intensification, step-up in hospital care, and mortality rates within 3 months were 47% versus 60% (P = 0.0272), 13% versus 28% (P = 0.0024), and 2% versus 4% (P = 0.5075) in the azithromycin and placebo groups, respectively. Clinical benefits were lost 6 months after withdrawal. Conclusions: Three months of azithromycin for an infectious AECOPD requiring hospitalization may significantly reduce TF during the highest-risk period. Prolonged treatment seems to be necessary to maintain clinical benefits. Supported by the Flemish Government Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT) through the "Toegepast Biomedisch onderzoek met een primair Maatschappelijke finaliteit" (TBM) program (grant number IWT-TBM130233). The trial was approved and supported by the Belgian Thoracic Society (BVP-SBP), which provided logistic support for organizing the investigator meetings. Financial support for the study logistics was also received from TEVA, Belgium. The IWT, BVP-SBP, and TEVA were not involved in the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

RATIONALE: Azithromycin prevents acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs); however, its value in the treatment of an AECOPD requiring hospitalization remains to be defined. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether a 3-month intervention with low-dose azithromycin could decrease treatment failure (TF) when initiated at hospital admission and added to standard care. METHODS: In an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients who had been hospitalized for an AECOPD and had a smoking history of ≥10 pack-years and one or more exacerbations in the previous year were randomized (1:1) within 48 hours of hospital admission to azithromycin or placebo. The study drug (500 mg/d for 3 d) was administered on top of a standardized acute treatment of systemic corticosteroids and antibiotics, and subsequently continued for 3 months (250 mg/2 d). The patients were followed for 6 months thereafter. Time-to-first-event analyses evaluated the TF rate within 3 months as a novel primary endpoint in the intention-to-treat population, with TF defined as the composite of treatment intensification with systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics, a step-up in hospital care or readmission for respiratory reasons, or all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 301 patients were randomized to azithromycin (n = 147) or placebo (n = 154). The TF rate within 3 months was 49% in the azithromycin group and 60% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.01; P = 0.0526). Treatment intensification, step-up in hospital care, and mortality rates within 3 months were 47% versus 60% (P = 0.0272), 13% versus 28% (P = 0.0024), and 2% versus 4% (P = 0.5075) in the azithromycin and placebo groups, respectively. Clinical benefits were lost 6 months after withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Three months of azithromycin for an infectious AECOPD requiring hospitalization may significantly reduce TF during the highest-risk period. Prolonged treatment seems to be necessary to maintain clinical benefits.

Background Infections with SARS-CoV-2 continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality. Interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 blockade have been proposed as therapeutic strategies in COVID-19, but study outcomes have been conflicting. We sought to study whether blockade of the IL-6 or IL-1 pathway shortened the time to clinical improvement in patients with COVID-19, hypoxic respiratory failure, and signs of systemic cytokine release syndrome. Methods We did a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, hypoxia, and signs of a cytokine release syndrome across 16 hospitals in Belgium. Eligible patients had a proven diagnosis of COVID-19 with symptoms between 6 and 16 days, a ratio of the partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2:FiO(2)) of less than 350 mm Hg on room air or less than 280 mm Hg on supplemental oxygen, and signs of a cytokine release syndrome in their serum (either a single ferritin measurement of more than 2000 mu g/L and immediately requiring high flow oxygen or mechanical ventilation, or a ferritin concentration of more than 1000 mu g/L, which had been increasing over the previous 24 h, or lyrnphopenia below 800/mL with two of the following criteria: an increasing ferritin concentration of more than 700 mu g/L, an increasing lactate dehydrogenase concentration of more than 300 international units per L, an increasing C-reactive protein concentration of more than 70 mg/L, or an increasing D-dimers concentration of more than 1000 ng/mL). The COV-AID trial has a 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate IL-1 blockade versus no IL-1 blockade and IL-6 blockade versus no IL-6 blockade. Patients were randomly assigned by means of permuted block randomisation with varying block size and stratification by centre. In a first randomisation, patients were assigned to receive subcutaneous anakinra once daily (100 mg) for 28 days or until discharge, or to receive no IL-1 blockade (1:2). In a second randomisation step, patients were allocated to receive a single dose of siltuximab (11 mg/kg) intravenously, or a single dose of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg) intravenously, or to receive no IL-6 blockade (1:1:1). The primary outcome was the time to clinical improvement, defined as time from randomisation to an increase of at least two points on a 6-category ordinal scale or to discharge from hospital alive. The primary and supportive efficacy endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the safety population. This study is registered online with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04330638) and EudraCT (2020-001500-41) and is complete. Findings Between April 4, and Dec 6,2020,342 patients were randomly assigned to IL-1 blockade n=112) or no IL-1 blockade (n=230) and simultaneously randomly assigned to IL-6 blockade (n=227; 114 for tocilizumab and 113 for siltuximab) or no IL-6 blockade (n=115). Most patients were male (265 [77%] of 342), median age was 65 years (IQR 54-73), and median Systematic Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at randomisation was 3 (2-4). All 342 patients were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis. The estimated median time to clinical improvement was 12 days (95% CI 10-16) in the IL-1 blockade group versus 12 days (10-15) in the no IL-1 blockade group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94 [95% CI 0.73-1.21]). For the IL-6 blockade group, the estimated median time to clinical improvement was 11 days (95% CI 10-16) versus 12 days (11-16) in the no IL-6 blockade group (HR 1.00[0-78-1-29]). 55 patients died during the study, but no evidence for differences in mortality between treatment groups was found. The incidence of serious adverse events and serious infections was similar across study groups. Interpretation Drugs targeting IL-1 or IL-6 did not shorten the time to clinical improvement in this sample of patients with COVID-19, hypoxic respiratory failure, low SOFA score, and low baseline mortality risk. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center; VIB Grand Challenges program The authors acknowledge professional support and committed efforts from various organisations and individuals involved in this trial and thank all trial participants and clinicians involved in patient recruitment at the different participating sites. This study was funded by KCE, and KCE was involved in various aspects of the study design, management, and execution (Nelle Stocquart, Jillian Harrison). The VIB Grand Challenges Program (Sofie Bekaert) funded measurements of cytokines and the Ghent University Special Research Fund (BOF) supported the clinical follow-up of patients at Ghent University Hospital (UZ Ghent). The clinical trial team of the Department of Respiratory Medicine at UZ Ghent (Stefanie Vermeersch, Benedicte Demeyere, Anja Delporte) were involved in protocol development, amendment filing, and eCRF construction. The Health Innovation and Research Institute of UZ Ghent was involved in eCRF design, protocol design, ethical committee reporting, drug dispensing, trial monitoring, data cleaning, and sponsor site management (Charlotte Clauwaert, Dries Loncke, Hanife Kokur, Lieselot Van Landuyt, Joke Tommelein, Hélène De Naeyer). The hospital pharmacy of UZ Ghent dispensed drugs to all study sites (Els Kestens). Team members of the Primary Immune Deficiency laboratory (Karlien Claes, Veronique Debacker, Lisa Roels, Zara Declercq) handled samples from all study sites. The authors acknowledge the insights of the data safety monitoring board (Drs Renaat Peleman, Geert Leroux-Roels, Steven Callens, Frank Vermassen, Piet Hoebeke, Karim Vermaelen, A Dupont, Tomasz Burzykowski, and Marnik Vuylsteke under the chairmanship of SR).