1. Effect of Glaucomatous Damage on Repeatability of Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, Scanning Laser Polarimetry, and Optical Coherence Tomography
- Author
-
Bobby Kakati, Julio E. DeLeo´n Ortega, Blythe E. Monheit, Stella N. Arthur, Christopher A. Girkin, Gerald McGwin, and Lisandro M. Sakata
- Subjects
Adult ,Diagnostic Imaging ,Male ,Retinal Ganglion Cells ,medicine.medical_specialty ,genetic structures ,Optic Disk ,Optic disk ,Vision Disorders ,Scanning laser polarimetry ,Glaucoma ,Article ,Ophthalmoscopy ,Nerve Fibers ,Optical coherence tomography ,Ophthalmology ,Optic Nerve Diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Intraocular Pressure ,Balayage ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Lasers ,Reproducibility of Results ,Repeatability ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,eye diseases ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Optometry ,Visual Field Tests ,Female ,sense organs ,business ,Tomography, Optical Coherence ,Optic disc - Abstract
Studies evaluating the reproducibility of recent versions of the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT-II; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), scanning laser polarimetry (GDx-VCC; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), and optical coherence tomography (StratusOCT; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.) have shown that each of these imaging techniques obtains measurements with a high degree of reproducibility.1–5 However, most of these studies were performed in healthy eyes or in eyes of patients with glaucoma with predominantly early field loss and did not include cases with more advanced stages of field loss.3,5–7 Hence, evaluation of reproducibility for glaucoma cases has been performed in cohorts with a truncated range of field loss ranging from none to early loss, and reproducibility is unknown in cases with more advanced field loss. Although it has been argued that observation and documentation of the optic disc becomes less important at more advanced stages of disease, this has never been rigorously evaluated with subjective and objective techniques. Furthermore, the “floor” effect in cases of advanced glaucoma also impairs the utility in visual fields, which become increasingly variable in advanced disease.8,9 Indeed, no validated technique has been developed to observe patients with advanced glaucoma. Although a floor effect has been reported using GDx-VCC in eyes of patients with end-stage glaucoma,8 it is unknown whether a similar effect is likely to be present in less damaged eyes with severe field loss and good central visual acuity. In addition, higher test–retest variability of the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRT) has been reported in locations of the optic disc topography with steep contour, such as the optic disc cup.10 Thus, test–retest variability is likely to be altered by variation in the surface contour of the optic disc as the disease advances. The purpose of the study was to determine and compare the effect of degree of field loss on the repeatability (two replicated scans) of nerve fiber layer measured with GDx-VCC and StratusOCT and on optic nerve head (ONH) topography measured with HRT-II and StratusOCT within the same study population of healthy eyes and glaucomatous eyes with diverse degrees of field loss.
- Published
- 2007