Search

Purpose: Vitreomacular traction (VMT) is a relatively common ocular disorder that may distort the foveal structure causing visual symptoms. The influence of ocular massage (OM) on this condition has not been considered yet. We aim to report clinical and OCT features of VMT release associated with OM., Observations: A 70-year-old woman complained about blurred vision and metamorphopsia in her right eye for one month. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/50. Macular OCT showed focal VMT in this eye. Moderate intensity, digital OM was performed by an ophthalmologist. However, the traction was still present. The patient was instructed to perform the same OM every 8 hours at home herself. Four days later she indicated disappearance of metamorphopsia, her BCVA increased to 20/25 and OCT showed VMT release with 39-μm foveal thinning., Conclusions and Importance: OM may be useful for focal VMT release.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of fentanyl and remifentanil in the prevention of hemodynamic responses to direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation, and to compare the effects of these techniques on peripheral blood oxyhemoglobin saturation in normotensive women undergoing scheduled gynecologic surgery., Material and Methods: Prospective clinical trial in ASA 1-2 patients undergoing gynecologic surgery. The patients were randomized to 2 groups: the remifentanil group received a perfusion of 1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) until intubation whereas the fentanyl group received a bolus dose of 2 microg x kg(-1). Etomidate (0.3 mg x kg(-1)) and rocuronium bromide (0.6 mg x kg(-1)) were used for anesthetic induction. Seven serial measurements of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were recorded in addition to heart rate and peripheral blood oxyhemoglobin saturation at the following times: baseline, denitrogenation, postinduction, and 3 more times at consecutive 2-minute intervals., Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled. A statistically significant attenuation of the postintubation hemodynamic response was observed in the remifentanil group. The effect was evident on arterial pressure (P=.0001) and heart rate (P=.031) with respect to baseline values. That protective effect was not seen in the fentanyl group. No differences in peripheral blood oxyhemoglobin saturation were observed., Conclusions: Remifentanil provides greater hemodynamic control than fentanyl at the doses utilized. No adverse effects attributable to these opioids were observed in either group.