Search

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is an anatomopathological lesion mediated by endothelial dysfunction and characterized by the creation of microthrombi in small vessels. In patients with cancer, it may be due to toxicity secondary to chemotherapy, tumor embolization, or hematopoietic progenitor transplantation. Cancer-associated TMA is an underestimated entity that generally appears in the final stages of the disease, although it may also be the initial manifestation of an underlying cancer. Support treatment is necessary in all cases and, depending on the cause, different targeted therapies may be used. The prognosis is very poor. In this article we present a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the physiological mechanisms of cancer-associated TMA. Afterwards, five clinical cases will be presented of patients who developed TMA and were diagnosed in our Department in 2023. We present a discussion of the different causes that triggered the condition, the possible reasons behind the underestimation of this pathology, and the measures that may be adopted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our previous phase-3 study (TTCC 2503) failed to show overall survival advantage of 2 induction chemotherapy (IC) regimens followed by standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) over CRT alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC). This study described the long-term survival of those patients. Materials and methods: Long-term follow-up study of patients with untreated LAHNSCC assigned to IC (three cycles), with either docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF arm) or cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF arm), followed by CRT, or CRT alone, included in the previous TTCC 2503 trial. Results: In the intention-to-treat population (n = 439), the median OS times were 25.4 (95% CI, 16.8–34.4), 26.2 (95% CI, 18.2–36.6) and 25.4 months (95% CI, 17.4–36.0) in the TPF-CRT, PF-CRT and CRT arms, respectively (log-rank p = 0.51). In the per-protocol population (n = 355), patients with larynx–hypopharynx primary tumors treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a longer median PFS than those who received CRT alone. Moreover, patients with ECOG 0 treated with IC (TPF or PF) followed by CRT had a better TTF than those with CRT alone. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of OS, PFS or TTF, according to the tumor load or affected nodes. Conclusion: After a long follow-up, the TTCC 2503 trial failed to show the benefit of IC-CRT in unresectable LAHNSCC regarding the primary end point. However, fit patients with ECOG 0 and primary larynx–hypopharyngeal tumors may benefit from the use of IC if administered by an experienced team. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00261703 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team., Objective: Development of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP., Methods: Between March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes., Results: New and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up., Conclusions: Consensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In the last few years, nivolumab has become the standard of care for advanced-stage lung cancer patients. Unfortunately, up to 60% of patients do not respond to this treatment. In our study, we identified variations in gene expression related to primary resistance to immunotherapy. Bronchoscopy biopsies were obtained from advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients previously characterized as responders or non-responders after nivolumab treatment. Ten tumor biopsies (from three responders and seven non-responders) were analyzed by the differential expression of 760 genes using the NanoString nCounter platform. These genes are known to be involved in the response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy. All the patients were treated with nivolumab. Examining the dysregulated expression of 24 genes made it possible to predict the response to nivolumab treatment. Supervised analysis of the gene expression profile (GEP) revealed that responder patients had significantly higher levels of expression of CXCL11, NT5E, KLRK1, CD3G, GZMA, IDO1, LCK, CXCL9, GNLY, ITGAL, HLA-DRB1, CXCR6, IFNG, CD8A, ITK, B2M, HLA-B, and HLA-A than did non-responder patients. In contrast, PNOC, CD19, TP73, ARG1, FCRL2, and PTGER1 genes had significantly lower expression levels than non-responder patients. These findings were validated as predictive biomarkers in an independent series of 201 patients treated with nivolumab (22 hepatocellular carcinomas, 14 non-squamous cell lung carcinomas, 5 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, 1 ureter/renal pelvis carcinoma, 120 melanomas, 4 bladder carcinomas, 31 renal cell carcinomas, and 4 squamous cell lung carcinomas). ROC curve analysis showed that the expression levels of ITK, NT5E, ITGAL , and CD8A were the best predictors of response to nivolumab. Further, 13/24 genes showed an adverse impact on overall survival (OS) in an independent, large series of patients with NSCLC (2166 cases). In summary, we found a strong association between the global GEP of advanced NSCLC and the response to nivolumab. The classification of NSCLC patients based on GEP enabled us to identify those patients who genuinely benefited from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We also demonstrated that abnormal expression of most of the markers comprising the genomic signature has an adverse influence on OS, making them significant markers for therapeutic decision-making. Additional prospective studies in larger series of patients are required to confirm the clinical utility of these biomarkers.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and genetic characteristics of young lung cancer cases, and to compare them with those of older cases., Methods: We used the Thoracic Tumors Registry (TTR) as a data source representative of lung cancer cases diagnosed in Spain, and included all cases registered until 9/01/2023 which had information on age at diagnosis or the data needed to calculate it. We performed a descriptive statistical analysis and fitted logistic regressions to analyze how different characteristics influenced being a younger lung cancer patient., Results: A total of 26,336 subjects were included. Lung cancer cases <50 years old had a higher probability of being women (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.21-1.57), being in stage III or IV (OR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08-1.62), not having comorbidities (OR: 5.21; 95% CI: 4.59-5.91), presenting with symptoms at diagnosis (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.29-1.81), and having ALK translocation (OR: 7.61; 95% CI: 1.25-46.32) and HER2 mutation (OR: 5.71; 95% CI: 1.34-24.33), compared with subjects ≥50 years. Among subjects <35 years old (n=61), our study observed a higher proportion of women (59.0% vs. 26.6%; p<0.001), never smokers (45.8% vs. 10.3%; p<0.001), no comorbidities (21.3% vs. 74.0%; p<0.001); ALK translocation (33.3% vs. 4.4%; p<0.001) and ROS1 mutation (14.3% vs. 2.3%; p=0.01), compared with subjects ≥35 years., Conclusions: Lung cancer displays differences by age at diagnosis which may have important implications for its clinical management., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-23-1854/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (iSGLT2) inhibitors, which include dapagliflozin, canagliflozin and empagliflozin, are a class of drugs initially used in the oral treatment of diabetes, heart failure and renal failure. They target the reabsorption of glucose in the kidney. Although they bring benefit to patients with these conditions and in general produce few adverse effects, in some cases, iSGLT2 can cause serious adverse effects such as metabolic acidosis, and fungal or bacterial urinary infections. Oncology patients, who in general have a weak immune system and are usually treated with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy, are more susceptible to this type of adverse events than other patients. For this reason, it is necessary to adequately select the patients eligible to receive this type of drug and evaluate the potential benefits for them. In this series of five cases, we present two cases of metabolic acidosis, two cases of bacterial urinary sepsis, and one case of fungal urinary sepsis that occurred in patients admitted to the Medical Oncology Department of the University Hospital of Salamanca in 2023., Learning Points: Adverse events associated with iSGLT2 can lead to serious complications in immunocompromised patients. There have been cases of prolonged admissions with high morbidity and mortality due to bacterial or fungal infections and metabolic acidosis, all of which are side effects derived from their use.In oncology patients, an adequate evaluation of the risk-benefit balance must be conducted before the introduction of new drugs.Studies should be conducted to assess the risk of serious adverse effects in oncology patients undergoing treatment with chemotherapy or immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interests: The Authors declare that there are no competing interests., (© EFIM 2024.)

Objectives: The aim of the study was to ascertain the percentage of Spanish lung cancer cases that would fulfil the lung cancer screening inclusion criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) in 2013 and 2021., Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out. All lung cancer cases registered in the Thoracic Tumor Registry with data on date of birth, date of diagnosis, smoking habit, number of pack-years and time elapsed since smoking cessation were included., Results: The study included 15 006 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Spain between 2016 and 2022. Eligibility to participate in screening increased from 53.7% to 63.5% (an increase of 9.8%) according to the 2013 and 2021 recommendations, respectively. The percentage of eligible men rose by 9.2 percentage points with the 2021 versus 2013 recommendations, whereas this rise was 11.5 percentage points in women. Under the 2021 recommendations, 36.6% of women and 5.3% of men would not have fulfilled the screening inclusion criteria due to being never-smokers; 14.9% of women and 11.0% of men would not have fulfilled the age criterion; and 27.0% of ex-smokers among women compared to 35.6% among men would not have been eligible due to >15 years having elapsed since smoking cessation., Conclusions: In Spain, over one-third of lung cancer cases could not be detected through screening, by virtue of not meeting the most recent inclusion criteria stated by the USPSTF. The degree of fulfilment in a potential nationwide screening programme should be analysed, with the aim of establishing inclusion criteria in line with each country's context., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Ruano-Ravina is an associate editor of this journal. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a major change in the last decade in terms of survival and prognosis due to the introduction of new drugs in the last 10 years. One of the drugs with the most promising preliminary results in NSCLC are PARP inhibitors (iPARPs), whose clinical trials have very heterogeneous results. The use of iPARPs in NSCLC may lead to increased survival in several selected patients, and their use may become a standard in the coming years. However, there is currently controversy about the efficacy and safety of these drugs in NSCLC. Therefore, future studies are needed to evaluate their role in these tumours. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iPARPs in the treatment of NSCLC., Methods: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis using the different clinical trials (PubMed, COCHRANE, Science Direct, EMBASE and the clinical trial registry) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of iPARP in NSCLC by PRISMA criteria. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of iPARPs in the treatment of NSCLC through overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS). Two authors independently reviewed the articles and abstracts (A.O.H. and J.R.R.), with subsequent confirmation by a third independent reviewer (E.B.M.). The heterogeneity of the included studies in the meta-analysis was assessed by using the I2 statistic., Results: A total of 14 articles were included for analysis (2,651 patients). A total of 1,503 patients were randomised in iPARP arms and 1,148 patients were included in control arms. Three clinical trials were conducted in localised or locally advanced NSCLC and 11 in advanced or metastatic stages. The global OS of the meta-analysis showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.97] with a heterogeneity (I2) of 0% (P=0.84). PFS showed a HR of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.74-1.17) with an I2=51% (P=0.07). The overall adverse event rate (grade 1-5) was similar in both iPARP and placebo arms., Conclusions: iPARPs are a future promising in the treatment of NSCLC in terms of efficacy and safety. Proper patient selection [homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) positive] is key for future clinical trials. The studies conducted to date open a new approach for a novel treatment modality in NSCLC.

Background: The burden of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains high in Spain, with lung cancer accounting for 20% of cancer-related deaths annually. Programs such as the Spanish Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR) and the global I-O Optimise initiative have been developed to observe patients in clinical practice with the aim of improving outcomes. This analysis examined treatment patterns and survival in patients with stage III NSCLC from the TTR. These patients represent a heterogenous group with complex treatment pathways., Methods: The TTR is an ongoing, observational, prospective, and retrospective cohort multicentre study (NCT02941458) that follows patients with thoracic cancer in Spain. Adults aged ≥18 years with stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC enrolled in the TTR between 01 Jan 2010 and 31 Oct 2019 were included in this analysis. Initial treatment received was described by cancer stage and histology (squamous and non-squamous NSCLC). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated over a 5-year period., Results: A total of 1,838 patients were included in the cohort, including 1,082 with stage IIIA (58.9%) and 756 with stage IIIB (41.1%). Median follow-up was 18.3 months. The median age of patients was 66 years, and most had non-squamous NSCLC (54.0%), were male (81.2%), and were active or former smokers (93.4%). Overall, 26.3% of patients received surgical resection (37.0% for stage IIIA and 11.1% for stage IIIB). The most frequent initial treatment received was concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIA (30.2%) and stage IIIB (37.0%) patients. Median OS was lower in patients with stage IIIB than stage IIIA (28 vs. 37 months) disease and was lower for patients with squamous than non-squamous histology (19 vs. 26 months). Median PFS and OS varied when patients were stratified by initial treatment., Conclusions: This TTR analysis describes the clinical reality surrounding the initial management and survival outcomes for stage III NSCLC in Spain and presents survival outcomes comparable with other real-world evidence. It provides insights into the diverse approaches used before the availability of immunotherapies and targeted treatments in the non-metastatic NSCLC setting., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-176/coif). MP served as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research from October 2021 to September 2023. All authors report that this work was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. MP reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda. RLC reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Aristo, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Roche and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Novartis, Roche and Takeda. VC reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda. DRA reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Novartis and Roche. DRA also reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Novartis and Roche. BM reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Roche and Sanofi. BM also reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche and Takeda; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca and MSD. JBB reports institutionally awarded grants and personal fees from Pfizer and Roche. JBB also reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Roche and Sanofi; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, Roche and Takeda. ER is an employee of IQVIA. RC, Carlos Chaib, JP, LV and MJD are employees of Bristol Myers Squibb, the study sponsor. Carlos Chaib, JP and LV also report stock ownership in Bristol Myers Squibb. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Immunotherapy represents a key pillar of cancer treatments, with high response rates and long survival. Its use is increasing, mainly at the expense of the geriatric population due to the ageing of this population. However, despite its benefit, its safety in certain areas such as cardiotoxicity is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to assess the safety of immunotherapy in elderly patients using real-world data., Methods: This is an ambispective study of patients ≥ 70 years old with solid tumours who were treated with immunotherapy at the University Hospital of Salamanca. Cardiotoxicity was assessed using the CTCAEv5.0 criteria., Results: In total, 195 patients were included (76.9% male and 23.1% female), with a mean age of 75 years [70-93]. The percentage of patients with cardiotoxicity was 1.54%; 1.35% of patients with previous heart disease were diagnosed with cardiotoxicity, and 1.65% of those without previous heart disease were diagnosed with cardiotoxicity. The median time from the initiation of treatment until the cardiac event was 45 days [14-96]. The most frequent toxicity was myocarditis in 66.7% of patients, followed by arrhythmias in 33.3% of patients., Conclusions: Immunotherapy is shown to be a safe treatment in elderly cancer patients in terms of cardiotoxicity. The event rate shows no difference between patients with or without cardiac comorbidity.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of the ERBITAX scheme (paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 weekly and cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 loading dose, and then 250 mg/m 2 weekly) as first-line treatment for patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who are medically unfit for cisplatin-based (PT) chemotherapy., Materials and Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study involved 16 centers in Spain. Inclusion criteria were to have started receiving ERBITAX regimen from January 2012 to December 2018; histologically confirmed SCCHN including oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx; age ≥18 years; and platinum (PT) chemotherapy ineligibility due to performance status, comorbidities, high accumulated dose of PT, or PT refractoriness., Results: A total of 531 patients from 16 hospitals in Spain were enrolled. The median age was 66 years, 82.7% were male, and 83.5% were current/former smokers. Patients were ineligible to receive PT due to ECOG 2 (50.3%), comorbidities (32%), PT cumulative dose ≥ 225 mg/m 2 (10.5%), or PT refractoriness (7.2%). Response rate was 37.7%. Median duration of response was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-6.6). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.7-10.2), median PFS and OS were 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-5.0) and 8.9 months (95% CI: 7.8-10.3), respectively. Patients treated with immunotherapy after ERBITAX had better OS with a median of 29.8 months compared to 13.8 months for those who received other treatments. The most common grade ≥ 3 toxicities were acne-like rash in 36 patients (6.8%) and oral mucositis in 8 patients (1.5%). Five (0.9%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia., Conclusion: This study confirms the real-world efficacy and tolerability of ERBITAX as first-line treatment in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN when PT is not feasible. Immunotherapy after treatment with ERBITAX showed remarkable promising survival, despite potential selection bias., Competing Interests: JR-C: Advisory role: Sanofi, Novartis and Merck. BCC: Support for this manuscript from Merck through TTCC Group. Speaker on behalf of BMS, MSD, and Merck. Meeting support from BMS and MSD. Member of TTCC Group unpaid. MP: Speaker on behalf of BMS. Meeting support from MSD Oncology. AG: Advisory board from MSD and Bristol Myers Squibb. AC: Speaker on behalf of Merck. Meeting support from Merck. LI: Speaker on behalf of Merck, MSD, Roche, Bayer, Eisai. Meeting support from Merck and MSD. Advisory board from Merck MSD, Roche, Lilly, and Ipsen. PP: Received grants from BMS, Merck, and MSD. Consulting fees from BMS, Merck, and MSD. Speaker on behalf of BMS, Merck, and MSD. Meeting support from BMS, Merck, and MSD. Member of TTCC Group. IC: Speaker on behalf of MSD, Merck, Roche, BMS, Seagen, and Pfizer. Meeting support in Pfizer, MSD, and Merck. CP: Speaker on behalf of Novartis, Merck, and MSD. Meeting support from Novartis, Merck, and MSD. IH: Speaker on behalf of Pierre Fabre educational event and Merck lecture. Meeting support from Merck support for an event and AztraZeneca support for educational expertise. MC: Participated in and received equipment for clinical trials from the institution. Speaker on behalf of MSD and Merck. Meeting support from MSD and Merck. EO: Speaker on behalf of GSK, AstraZeneca, Clovis, Merck, Pharmamar, and MSD. Expert testimony for GSK. Meeting support from Merck and MSD. Advisory board for Eisai. RM: Support for this manuscript from Merck for medical writing and article processing charges. Speaker on behalf of MSD and Merck. Meeting support from BMS, Merck, and MSD. Advisory board for MSD, Merck, Boehringer, Bayer, Roche, Nanobiotics and Sigean. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Rubió-Casadevall, Cirauqui Cirauqui, Martinez Trufero, Plana Serrahima, García Castaño, Carral Maseda, Iglesias Docampo, Pérez Segura, Ceballos Lenza, Gutiérrez Calderón, Fuster Salvà, Pena Álvarez, Hernandez, del Barco Morillo, Chaves Conde, Martínez Galán, Durán Sánchez, Quiroga, Ortega and Mesia.)

In recent years, non-small cell lung cancer treatment has been revolutionized. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and our improved understanding of its alterations have driven new diagnostic strategies. Liquid biopsies have emerged as a useful tool in these contexts, showing potential utility in early diagnosis combined with low-dose CT scans, as well as potential in monitoring treatment response and predicting the development of patients. We studied the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) of 38 EGFR -mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients at diagnosis in different moments of their disease by liquid biopsy techniques. Our results show that mean overall survival was significantly lower when a liquid biopsy was positive for the detection of EGFR mutations compared with wild-type patients in their liquid biopsy in both univariate (29 ± 4 vs. 104 ± 19 months; p = 0.004) and multivariate analysis ( p = 0.008). Taking this into consideration, liquid biopsies could be key to improving the control of this disease.

Background: Determining predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a current challenge in oncology. Previous studies on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have shown how TP53 gene mutations are correlated with different responses to ICIs. Strong and diffuse immuno-expression of p53 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is interpreted as a likely indicator of a TP53 gene mutation. We aimed to assess the p53 protein expression via IHC in NSCLC as a predictive biomarker of the response to ICIs., Methods: This was a retrospective hospital-based study of patients with NSCLC treated with Nivolumab in the University Hospital of Salamanca. All diagnostic biopsies were studied via IHC (measuring p53 protein expression, peroxidase anti-peroxidase immunohistochemistry technique using Leica BOND Polymer development kits). Survival analysis was performed by subgroups of expression of p53 and other factors using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional-hazards model., Results: Seventy-three patients were included (59 men and 14 women). The median age was 68 (44-84) years. Thirty-six biopsies were adenocarcinoma, 34 were squamous, and three were undifferentiated. In 41 biopsies (56.2%), the cellular expression of p53 was <5% (Group A), and in 32 biopsies (43.8%), the expression was ≥5% (Group B). In the general analysis, no differences were observed in overall survival (OS) (A: 12 months vs B: 20 months; p = 0.070) or progression-free survival (PFS) (A: 4 m vs B: 7 m; p = 0.064). Significant differences were observed in adenocarcinomas for both OS (A: 8 m vs B: median not reached; p = 0.002) and PFS (A: 3 m vs 8 m; p = 0.013). No differences in PFS and OS were observed in squamous cell carcinoma. Significant differences were observed in OS in the PD-L1 negative group (0% expression) (A: 13 m vs B: 39 m; p = 0.024), but not in PFS (A: 3 m vs B: 7 m; p = 0.70). No differences were observed in the PD-L1 positive group., Conclusions: A trend toward a greater response to ICIs was observed in the PFS and OS of patients with high expression of p53 by IHC ( TP53 mutation), especially in the PD-L1 negative adenocarcinoma subgroup. These results will make it possible to make future modifications to the clinical guidelines of NSCLC according to the expression of p53., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) system predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) like colon or gastric cancer. However, the MMR system's involvement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. Addressing this issue will improve clinical guidelines in the case of mutations in the main genes of the MMR system (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). This work retrospectively assessed the role that these gene mutations play in the response to and survival of ICIs in NSCLC. Patients with NSCLC treated with nivolumab as the second-line treatment in the University Hospital of Salamanca were enrolled in this study. Survival and response analyses were performed according to groups of MMR system gene expression (MMR expression present or deficiency) and other subgroups, such as toxicity. There was a statistically significant relationship between the best response obtained and the expression of the MMR system ( p = 0.045). The presence of toxicity grade ≥ 3 was associated with the deficiency expression of MMR (dMMR/MSI-H) group ( p = 0.022; odds ratio = 10.167, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.669-61.919). A trend towards greater survival and response to ICIs was observed in NSCLC and dMMR. Assessing the genes in the MMR system involved in NSCLC is key to obtaining personalized immunotherapy treatments.

Background: Lung cancer causes approximately 25% of all cancer deaths. Despite its relevance, few studies have analyzed differences by sex at the time of diagnosis in terms of symptoms, stage, age or smoking status. We aim to assess if there are differences between men and women on these characteristics at diagnosis., Methods: We analyzed the Thoracic Tumour Registry (TTR), sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group using a case-series design. This is a nationwide registry of lung cancer cases which started recruitment in 2016. For each case included, clinicians fulfilled an electronic record registering demographic data, symptoms, exposure to lung cancer risk factors, and treatment received in detail. We compared men and women using descriptive statistics., Results: A total of 13,590 participants took part in this study, 25.6% women. Women were 4 years younger than men (64 vs. 69), and men had smoked more frequently. Adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histological type in both sexes. Stage IV at diagnosis was 50.8% in women compared to 43.6% in men. Weight loss/anorexia/asthenia was the most frequent symptom in both sexes and there were no differences in the number of symptoms at diagnosis. There were no relevant differences in the frequency or number of symptoms by sex when non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) were analyzed separately. Smoking status did not appear to cause different lung cancer presentation in men compared to women., Conclusions: There seems to be no differences in lung cancer characteristics by sex at the time at diagnosis on stage, specific symptoms or number of symptoms., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-559). MP serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Translational Lung Cancer Research. MP and VCJ receive consulting fees from BMS, ROCHE, ASTRAZENECA, MSD, Boehringer. AE receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, AstraZeneca. GB receives consulting fees from ROCHE, SANOFI. MG receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, Bristol Myers. CAR receives consulting fees from ROCHE, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. ÓJ receives consulting fees from Boehringer, BMS, Merch, Roche, Astrazeneca, Lilly, Takeda. MD receives consulting fees from Astrazeneca, BMS, Boehriguer, MSD, Pfizer, Roche. JMT receives consulting fees from BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca, Boehringer. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is the predominant tumour type arising in the nasopharynx. Its aetiology is multifactorial; racial and geographical distribution, EBV infection and environmental exposure to specific substances are considered risk factors. This condition is endemic in some Asian areas, where a genetic predisposition in its oncogenesis has been established. There is a strong susceptibility between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and HLA, where related specific haplotypes have been found. In areas where the incidence is low, there are few reported cases of families affected. We report 3 cases of families with nasopharyngeal carcinoma among siblings, in the non-Asian population, probably related to EBV infection., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the activity and safety profile of panitumumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN., Materials and Methods: The VECTITAX phase II, open-label, multicenter study included patients with confirmed metastatic and/or recurrent SCCHN deemed to be untreatable by surgery or radiotherapy and ECOG PS=0-1. All patients received paclitaxel (80mg/m 2 /week) and panitumumab (6mg/kg/2weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. EQ-5D-3L andvisual analogic scale (VAS) were used to evaluate impact on quality of life (QoL)., Results: The study included 40 patients (ITT population): (median age: 61 years; 87% male). Previous treatment: 29 patients (73%) had undergone surgery, 34 (85%) had received prior radiotherapy and 23 (58%) prior systemic treatment for locally advanced disease. Confirmed response was observed in 19 patients (48%) which was a complete response in 15% of patients. Stable disease was observed in 11 patients (28%). Disease control rate was 75%. Median progression-free survival was 7.5 months (95%CI: 4.9-8.3) and median overall survival 9.9 months (95%CI: 7.9-16.3). Most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were skin rash (25%); asthenia (17%); neurotoxicity (15%); hypomagnesemia (10%); neutropenia (10%). Permanent discontinuation of panitumumab or paclitaxel due to adverse events was required in 10 (25%) and 13 patients (33%), respectively. There was one toxic death due to febrile neutropenia. Patient-reported QoL was preserved with no decline of median VAS scores., Conclusion: Panitumumab and paclitaxel is an active combination, providing promising outcomes with preservation of the QoL and a favorable safety profile. (EudraCT: 2010-018898-37; NCT01264328)., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Paragangliomas are rare tumors and most are benign: less than 10% show criteria for malignancy. In the head and neck, the main locations are carotid, jugulo-tympanic and vagal. Surgery continues to be the mainstay of treatment but both external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have been shown to be effective therapeutic alternatives. EBRT requires large volumes to cover the lesion, while radiosurgery allows administration of a high dose in a smaller volume, with high precision, which should reduce the number of long-term complications. The results in terms of local control with both treatment modalities are good, as reflected in published series. The role of chemotherapy is restricted to malignant paragangliomas. The treatment used includes the combination of chemotherapy, which provides short-lasting responses, and the role of new molecular targets is currently being investigated. The present article reviews the indications and results of the non-surgical treatment of paragangliomas.