Search

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival for patients with ATL who responded to alemtuzumab therapy

Translation on this Article from EBV-Related Lymphoproliferative Disease Complicating Therapy with the Anti-CD2 Monoclonal Antibody, Siplizumab, in Patients with T-Cell Malignancies

Purpose: We report an increased incidence of EBV-induced B-cell lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) in patients treated with siplizumab, an anti-CD2 antibody. The development of EBV-LPD has been associated with the use of immunosuppressive agents used in solid organ, bone marrow, and stem cell transplantation and in certain congenital immunodeficiencies.Experimental Design: We conducted a single-institution phase I dose-escalation trial of siplizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to CD2, in 29 patients with T-cell malignancies.Results: Although initial responses were encouraging, 4 (13.7%) patients developed EBV-LPD and the trial was stopped. Reductions in CD4+ and CD8+ cell count numbers in response to therapy were seen in all patients, but in those patients developing EBV-LPD a significantly greater reduction in natural killer (NK) cell number and CD2 expression on T cells was seen. These findings highlight the importance of NK-cell depletion and CD2 expression in addition to T-cell depletion in the etiology of EBV-LPD.Conclusions: The emergence of EBV-LPD may be associated with the ability of siplizumab to deplete both T and NK cells without affecting B cells. Agents that deplete T- and NK-cell populations without affecting B cell number should be screened for this potentially serious adverse event.

Supplementary Tables S1-S3 from EBV-Related Lymphoproliferative Disease Complicating Therapy with the Anti-CD2 Monoclonal Antibody, Siplizumab, in Patients with T-Cell Malignancies

Purpose: Therapeutic regimens for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) are limited with unsatisfactory results, thereby warranting development of novel therapies. This study investigated antitumor activity and toxicity of alemtuzumab with regard to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1)-associated ATL.Experimental Design: Twenty-nine patients with chronic, acute, and lymphomatous types of ATL were enrolled in a single-institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase II trial wherein patients received intravenous alemtuzumab 30 mg three times weekly for a maximum of 12 weeks.Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall objective response was 15 of 29 patients [95% confidence interval (CI), 32.5%–70.6%]. The 15 patients who responded manifested a median time to response of 1.1 months. Median response duration was 1.4 months for the whole group and 14.5 months among responders. Median progression-free survival was 2.0 months. Median overall survival was 5.9 months. The most common adverse events were 2 with vasovagal episodes (7%) and 3 with hypotensive episodes (10%), leukopenia (41%) grade 3 and (17%) grade 4, lymphocytopenia (59%) grade 3, neutropenia (31%) grade 3, anemia (24%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). All patients developed cytomegalovirus antigenemia (CMV). Three were symptomatic and all responded to antiviral therapy. Grade 3 or 4 infections were reported in 4 (14%) of patients.Conclusions: Alemtuzumab induced responses in patients with acute HTLV-1–associated ATL with acceptable toxicity, but with short duration of responses. These studies support inclusion of alemtuzumab in novel multidrug therapies for ATL. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 35–42. ©2016 AACR.

Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression free survival of all patients with ATL who received alemtuzumab therapy

Aim: Adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC is associated with modest benefits and significant toxicity. We sought to evaluate the toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy and disease-specific outcomes in a real-world population. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC in an Irish center over a 7-year period. We described treatment-associated toxicity, recurrence-free survival and overall survival. Results: 62 patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment-associated hospitalisation occurred in 29% of patients. Relapse was recorded in 56% of patients and median recurrence-free survival was 27 months. Conclusion: High rates of disease recurrence and treatment-associated morbidity were observed in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for NSCLC. Novel therapeutic strategies are required to improve outcomes in this population.

Background Frailty characteristics such as compromised response to stressors and accumulation of deficits in physiological systems may leave frailer older adults at higher risk of adverse outcomes from PIP, compared with their non-frail counterparts of the same age. This study aims to examine the relationship between measured frailty and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults presenting acutely to hospital. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted. Participants were acutely hospitalised older adults. Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 65 years old, acute admission 24 hrs. Exclusion Criteria: Results The mean (±standard deviation [SD]) age of study participants was 79.25[±7.14], 56.5% were female. The prevalence of frailty measured using the CFS and Frail-VIG were 61.5% and 50.5% respectively. Applying the CFS, the mean number of STOPP criteria in non-frail patients was 1.03 and 1.87 for frail patients (p = 0.001 CI 95%) and 1.14 and 2.10 (p = 0.001 CI 95%) using the Frail-Vig Index. Conclusion Frailty is associated with functional decline, falls, hospitalisation and death. Frail patients had a higher mean number of STOPP criteria. As medication side effects are themselves included as part of the frailty syndrome, in-hospital medication review and patient centred medication optimisation should be guided by patient’s frailty status to reduce adverse outcomes.

Prophylactic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is often used for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients at high risk of central nervous system (CNS) relapse, despite limited evidence demonstrating efficacy or the optimal delivery method. We conducted a retrospective, international analysis of 1384 patients receiving HD-MTX CNS prophylaxis either intercalated (i-HD-MTX) (n = 749) or at the end (n = 635) of R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapy (EOT). There were 78 CNS relapses (3-year rate 5.7%), with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT: 5.7% vs 5.8%, P = .98; 3-year difference: 0.04% (−2.0% to 3.1%). Conclusions were unchanged on adjusting for baseline prognostic factors or on 6-month landmark analysis (n = 1253). In patients with a high CNS international prognostic index (n = 600), the 3-year CNS relapse rate was 9.1%, with no difference between i-HD-MTX and EOT. On multivariable analysis, increasing age and renal/adrenal involvement were the only independent risk factors for CNS relapse. Concurrent intrathecal prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in CNS relapse. R-CHOP delays of ≥7 days were significantly increased with i-HD-MTX vs EOT, with 308 of 1573 (19.6%) i-HD-MTX treatments resulting in a delay to subsequent R-CHOP (median 8 days). Increased risk of delay occurred in older patients when delivery was later than day 10 in the R-CHOP cycle. In summary, we found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk vs i-HD-MTX. Findings in high-risk subgroups were unchanged. Rates of CNS relapse in this HD-MTX-treated cohort were similar to comparable cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. If HD-MTX is still considered for certain high-risk patients, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion.

Background: The 21 gene recurrence score (OncotypeDx ®) is reimbursed in Ireland to guide adjuvant treatment decisions for ER+, LN-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative BC. There is emerging evidence supporting the clinical utility of this test in patients with LN+ disease. Although the exact cut-off for chemotherapy has not been defined in this population, SEER data support the omission of chemotherapy for patients with RS Results: In total, 294 patients were enrolled across the - nine centres. Complete data is available on 123 patients (range 38 to 75, median 54 years), which included two male patients. Of the remaining 121 (98%) patients, 49 (40%) were premenopausal, 26 (21%) perimenopausal and 46 (37%) postmenopausal. The median tumour size was 38 mm (Range 7 to 58 mm). There were 101 (82%) patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, 17 (14%) with lobular carcinoma and 5 (4%) classified as other breast histology. Seventeen patients (14%) had grade 1, 74 (60%) grade 2 and 32 (26%) grade 3 disease. There were 79 (64%) patients with 1 LN+, 35 (29%) with 2 LN+ and 9 (7%) with 3 LN+ status. Overall access to the 21 gene RS test led to a 32% reduction in chemotherapy, 112 (91%) to 72 (59%) patients. This was most notable in patients with ductal histology (91 vs 61) and grade 2 breast cancer (66 vs 41) representing a 24.4% and 20.3% reduction, respectively. Similarly patients with 1 LN+ (71 vs 46) and 2 LN+ (34 vs 21) represented a 20.3% and 9.7% reduction, respectively. This study also identified four patients aged less than 40, for whom chemotherapy was not recommended. The biggest reduction in chemotherapy occurred in women aged over 50 (62 vs 36) at 21.1%. Overall, in 65% of cases, medical oncologists deemed the RS test result significantly changed treatment recommendations. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with results from similar studies in other countries. Broader access to the 21-gene RS could result in a reduction in the use of chemotherapy in Ireland. Citation Format: William J Mullally, Dara Bracken-Clarke, Andrew Padmore, Seamus O'Reilly, Deirdre O’Mahony, Janice Walshe, John Kennedy, Rajnish Gupta, Cathy Kelly, Miriam O'Connor, Karen Duffy, Maccon Keane, Bryan T Hennessy, Patrick G Morris. The impact of the 21 gene recurrence score (RS) on chemotherapy prescribing in estrogen receptor positive (ER+), lymph node positive (LN+) breast cancer (BC) in Ireland: A national, multi-centre, prospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-56.

Background The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of severe drug interactions (SDIs) and potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) in older adults with cancer. Methods A 12-month prospective observational study of patients ≥65 years admitted to an oncology centre was conducted. SDIs were assessed using Stockley’s interaction checker; PIPs were identified using STOPP/START criteria. Logistic regression was applied to determine the influence of age, gender, co-morbidities and medication number on the likelihood of an SDI and a PIP. Results We enrolled 186 participants; mean age 72.5 (SD5.7) years, 46.2% female, mean co-morbidity number 7.5 (SD3.4), median medication number 7 (IQR4-9). Polypharmacy (≥6 medications) and major polypharmacy (≥11 medications) were identified in 60.8% and 17.7% respectively. Systemic anti-cancer therapies (SACTs) were concomitantly prescribed to 60.2%. SDIs were identified in 50.5% participants; 7.5% ≥1 SACT-SACT SDI, 41.4% ≥1 drug-drug SDI and 10.2% ≥1 drug-SACT SDI. The most common SDIs were beta-blocker/alpha-blocker (n=12), Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI)/proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (n=11) and SSRI/Aspirin (n=8). A strong correlation between medication and SDI number was identified (r2=0.61, p-value PIPs were observed in 73.1%; median 2(IQR1-3). The most common PIPs were drugs prescribed beyond the recommended duration (46.8%), high-dose PPIs >8 weeks (34.9%) and regular opioids without laxatives (20.4%). Patients prescribed ≥1 PIP had more co-morbidities (8.4(SD3.4) vs 5.2(SD2.4), p< 0.001), a higher cumulative illness rating score (18(IQR12-20) vs 11(IQR10-14), p Conclusion SDIs and PIPs are common in older adults with cancer and higher than previously reported. Comprehensive specialist medication evaluation, by a Geriatrician, may benefit patients.

Background Our goal was to determine (a) the prevalence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy in patients with cancer and (b) the prevalence, predictability, and preventability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) causing/contributing to hospitalization. Materials and Methods We conducted a 12-month prospective observational study of patients aged ≥16 years admitted to an oncology center. Older adults were aged ≥70 years. Results We enrolled 350 patients: 52.3% (n = 183) female, mean age 63.6 years (SD 12.1), 36.6% (n = 121) aged ≥70 years. Multimorbidity (≥2 conditions) was identified in 96.9%; 68% had ≥5 conditions. The median number of medications was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] 4–8); 47% were prescribed ≥6 medications and 11.4% ≥11 medications. Older adults had higher numbers of comorbid conditions (7 [IQR 5–10] vs. 5 [IQR 3–7]) and were prescribed more medications (median 7 [IQR 4–9] vs. 4 [IQR 2–7]). ADRs caused/contributed to hospitalization in 21.5% (n = 75): 35.8% (n = 72) of emergency admissions and 4.7% (n = 3) of elective admissions. The most common ADRs were neutropenia with infection (25.3%), dyspepsia/nausea/vomiting (20%), and constipation (20%). Causative medications included systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs; 53.3%), opioids (17.3%), corticosteroids (6.7%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (5.3%). ADR prevalence was similar in older and younger adults secondary to SACTs (8.3% vs. 13.1%), non-cancer medications (10.7% vs. 8.3%), and both (0% vs. 1.3%). ADRs were predictable in 89.3% (n = 67), definitely avoidable in 29.3% (n = 22), and possibly avoidable in 33.3% (n = 25). No association was identified between ADRs and age, gender, daily medication number, length of stay, or death. No ADR predictor variables were identified by logistic regression. Conclusion More than 21% of admissions to an oncology service are ADR-related. ADRs are caused by both SACTs and non-cancer-specific medications. The majority are predictable; ≥60% may be preventable. Patients with cancer have high levels of multimorbidity and polypharmacy, which require vigilance for related adverse outcomes. Implications for Practice A diagnosis of cancer often occurs in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Cancer can cause an altered physiological environment, placing patients at risk of drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study identified that ADRs caused or contributed to one in five hospital admissions of patients with cancer. ADRs were caused by systemic anticancer therapies (SACTs) in 53.3% of cases and non-cancer medications in 45.4% of cases, and a combination of both in 1.3%. ADRs occurred in similar frequencies in older and younger patients secondary to SACTs (8.3% vs. 13.1%, p = .295), non-SACTs (10.7% vs. 8.3%, p = .107), and a combination of both (0% vs. 1.3%, p = .240). The majority of ADRs were predictable (89.3%) and potentially preventable (62.6%). These findings support the need for increased awareness of medication-related adversity in patients with cancer and interventions to minimize their occurrence, thus supporting the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines that recommend adults ≥65 years of age receiving chemotherapy have geriatric assessment to identify medical and medication issues.

Introduction In 2012, Subcutaneous Trastuzumab (TSC) was introduced as an alternative to Intravenous Trastuzumab (TIV) for HER2+ breast cancer. The pivotal HannaH study demonstrated that TSC was non-inferior to TIV, was preferred by patients, and serious administration related reactions (ARRs) were not reported. However, the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) advises that patients be observed for ARRs for 6 hours post-first administration (and 2 hours post-subsequent administrations), similar to TIV. Aim To assess the frequency and tolerability of ARRs during the 6-hour observation period post first administration of TSC in patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Method: A retrospective audit of TSC was conducted in Southwest Ireland across five centers from 2014-2016. Patient charts were reviewed to record ARRs reported on the first-administration or at subsequent visit. In addition a subset of patients were interviewed regarding their recollection of ARRs with first or subsequent injections. Results: The study is ongoing having identified 192 patients. These centers have administered 2111 TSC injections in total, associated with 4998 hours of observation as per SPC. From the 385 injections given over the first two TSC administrations, 13 injections (3.4%) were associated with ARRs within 24 hours. Nine patients (2.3%) experienced injection site reactions immediately post injection, one injection site pain (0.3%), and one experienced petechiae on subsequent exposure (0.3%). Three patients experienced pyrexia and dry cough 24 hours post-injection and were hospitalized for respiratory tract infection. There were no reactions experienced between 2 and 6 hours post-first injection. There were no serious ARRs. Telephone interviews are ongoing and these results will be reported. Conclusion: ARRs related to TSC are usually immediate, mild and self-limiting. Observing patients for 6 hours post-first injection and 2 hours post-subsequent injections represents an inefficient use of healthcare resources. Citation Format: Karmali S, Hughes N, Kinneally A, Kroes J, Cook J, Killian M, Shafiq T, O'Mahony D, Bird B, O'Connor M, O'Reilly S, Galiauskas R, Murphy CG. A regional audit of 6-hour monitoring for administration related reactions during the first administration of subcutaneous trastuzumab [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-08.

Background:The phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is important in the oncogenic function of HER2. Aberrant activation of PI3K is implicated in resistance to trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies and is frequent, with up to 22% of HER2 positive breast cancer having a PIK3CA mutation. Copanlisib is a pan-class 1 PI3K inhibitor administered i.v. with low nanomolar activity against both PI3Kα and PI3Kβ. Copanlisib has been shown to re-sensitise trastuzumab resistant cell lines to trastuzumab with synergism seen in some cell lines between copanlisib and HER2 targeted therapy. Trial design: This is a phase Ib open label, single arm adaptive, multi-centre trial of copanlisib in combination with T-DM1. Eligible patients will receive T-DM1 at 3.6mg/kg i.v. on day 1 of a 21-day cycle plus copanlisib. Copanlisib will be administered i.v. according to the dose escalation scheme (dose level 1 is 45mg on days 1 and 8, dose level 2 is 60mg on days 1 and 8, dose level 3 is 60mg on days 1, 8, and 15). Dose level -1 will be 45 mg on day 1 in case dose de-escalation is needed. We will enrol 3 to 6 patients per dose level. All patients in each level must have completed at least the first cycle of therapy before enrolment in the next dose level. Patients not completing the first cycle for a reason other than toxicity will be replaced. Dose escalation and determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) will be based on the occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT). Eligibility criteria:Eligible patients are those with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive BC who previously received trastuzumab and a taxane, separately or in combination. Participants must have adequate organ function and ECOG PS ≤ 2 Objectives:The primary objective is to determine the MTD for copanlisib in combination with T-DM1 in patients with pre-treated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive BC. Secondary objectives include evaluating the safety, efficacy and cardiotoxicity in patients treated with this regimen. Exploratory objectives include examining for predictive biomarkers in tumour tissue and blood or plasma and to examine molecular tumour adaptation to clinical trial therapy. Statistical methods: Patients will be accrued in cohorts of 3 patients according to a standard 3+3 algorithm, with dose escalation and determination of MTD based on the occurrence of DLT, using the usual threshold probability of 33%. The final dose level will be expanded to include a total of 6 additional patients (expansion cohort). Present accrual and target accrual:The trial will start accrual in October 2018. Maximum of 24 patients will be enrolled. Citation Format: Hassan A, Gullo G, O'Reilly S, Ruiz-Borrego M, Toomey S, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Morris PG, Walshe JM, Crown J, O'Mahony D, Falcon A, Egan K, Hernando A, Teiserskiene A, Kelly CM, Coate L, Hennessy BT. Phase Ib clinical trial of coPANlisib in combination with Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in pre-treated unresectable locally advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breAst cancer (BC) “PANTHERA”-CTRIAL-IE 17-13 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-01.

e18784 Background: Febrile neutropenia in patients receiving chemotherapy is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt attention. This condition may also result in dose reductions, delays, or discontinuations of chemotherapy which compromise patient outcomes. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of COVID19 “lockdown” public health measures in Ireland on the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Methods: All patients receiving chemotherapy at the Bon Secours Hospital Cork who were admitted with neutropenia and fever during two separate time periods were included in the study: 1st April 2018 to 31st March 2019 (“pre-pandemic year”) and 1st April 2020 to 31st March 2021 (“pandemic year”). The pandemic year selected equates to a period of heightened infection control measures in Irish society, featuring public health advice re social distancing, routine mask wearing in public and successive lockdown waves. Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients admitted to the oncology inpatient ward who had blood cultures on admission to determine the number of these patients who were neutropenic at the time of blood culture draw. Similarly, pharmacy records were accessed to determine the number of unique chemotherapy items dispensed in each year in order to establish a rate of febrile neutropenia episodes per 100 chemotherapy items dispensed for each period. The incident rate ratio was calculated using the Exact Poisson Test. Results: During the pre-pandemic year there were 57 individual admissions with febrile neutropenia compared with 32 admissions during the pandemic year. There were 4581 chemotherapy units dispensed during the pre-pandemic year compared to 4628 during the pandemic year. The rate of febrile neutropenia episodes per 100 chemotherapy units dispensed was 1.24 (95% CI 0.94, 1.61) in the pre-pandemic year and 0.69 (95% CI 0.47, 0.98) in the pandemic year. The incident rate ratio is 1.80 (95% CI 1.14, 2.87, two-sided P = 0.007). 9 of 57 (16%) admissions in the pre-pandemic year were associated with positive blood cultures compared with 4 of 32 (13%) in the pandemic year (not significant by Fisher's exact test). Conclusions: Increased precautionary infection control measures during the COVID19 pandemic public health restrictions correlated with a significant reduction in the rate of febrile neutropenia amongst patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy. This suggests that there may be a role for similar measures for this patient cohort in the post-pandemic period. Options which patients may consider to employ include social distancing, wearing face-coverings and restricting social contacts while at risk of neutropenia from cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens.

e24088 Background: Up to one third of cancers in high-income populations can be attributed to lifestyle factors (nutrition & physical activity). Data on dietary beliefs in Irish patients with cancer are lacking. This study aims to evaluate how patients with cancer conceptualize the effect of diet on their disease and treatment & determine if attitudes vary according to age, gender, education, disease type, treatment type & treatment intent. Methods: This is a questionnaire-based study, carried out in an Irish oncology unit over a 3-week period in April 2021. Patients with an active cancer diagnosis attending the oncology day ward were invited to participate. We adapted a previously used questionnaire following expert review. A combination of yes/no and Likert scale responses were used: Have you changed your diet since you received your diagnosis? (Yes/no). To what degree do you think that...(Likert): Diet may contribute to the condition that you are being treated for?. Your diet after diagnosis helps your sense of health and wellness?. Diet can help relieve side effects of treatment?. Diet helps in preventing cancer recurrence?. Demographic and treatment data were recorded from patient charts. Responses were compared across demographic variables including gender, age, highest education level, primary cancer location/type and treatment intent using Chi-squared/Fishers exact test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: 130 patients were invited to take part & 113 responded (response rate 87%). 80% reported changing their diet since diagnosis, with no significant difference according to demographic variables. Most (68%) patients expressed a belief that diet played some role in their cancer development although only 15% believed that diet contributed ‘a lot’. Most patients (83%) believed that diet after a cancer diagnosis has an impact on their sense of health and well-being, and 32% expressed a strong belief in this regard (Likert scale 4, ‘a lot’). 75% believed that diet has some impact on managing treatment side effects. 81% believed that diet has some impact on cancer recurrence, and 30% believed it has a major impact (Likert scale 4). On multivariate analysis we found stronger beliefs in the impact of diet on cancer development (p = 0.049) and recurrence risk (p = 0.05) among men than women, and stronger belief in the impact of diet on recurrence risk among patients receiving treatment with curative versus palliative intent (p = 0.045). Conclusions: Most patients reported changing their diet following their cancer diagnosis, and most patients felt that diet had some impact on all of the areas studied including cancer development, health and well-being, managing side effects and cancer recurrence. Men expressed stronger beliefs than women in the impact of diet on cancer development and recurrence risk, and patients being treated with curative intent also expressed stronger beliefs in the impact of diet on cancer recurrence.

Introduction\ud \ud The efficacy of adding denosumab to standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients has been evaluated in two separate randomised trials (SPLENDOUR and AMGEN-249). In this pooled analysis, we will assess the combination-treatment effect in the largest available population, in order to conclude about the potential impact of denosumab in NSCLC.\ud \ud \ud \ud Methods\ud \ud Both trials included in this combined analysis, were randomised (SPLENDOUR 1:1, AMGEN-249 2:1) multi-centre trials stratified by histology, bone metastasis, geographical region and for SPLENDOUR only, ECOG PS. Cox proportional hazards models, were used to assess the treatment effect with respect to overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) and progression-free survival (PFS; secondary endpoint). Heterogeneity between trials was assessed, and subgroup analyses were performed.\ud \ud \ud \ud Results\ud \ud The pooled analysis was based on 740 randomised patients (SPLENDOUR:514; AMGEN-249:226), with 407 patients in the chemotherapy-denosumab arm and 333 in the chemotherapy-alone arm.\ud \ud \ud \ud In the chemotherapy-denosumab arm, at a median follow-up of 22.0 months, 277 (68.1%) deaths were reported with median OS 9.2 months (95%CI:[8.0–10.7]), while in the chemotherapy-alone arm, with similar median follow-up of 20.3 months, 230 (69.1%) deaths with median OS 9.9 months (95%CI:[8.2–11.2]). No significant denosumab effect was found (HR = 0.98; 95%CI:[0.82–1.18]; P = 0.85).\ud \ud \ud \ud Among subgroups, interaction was found between treatment and histology subtypes (P = 0.020), with a statistically significant benefit in the squamous group (HR = 0.70; 95%CI:[0.49–0.98]; P = 0.038), from 7.6 to 9.0 months median OS.\ud \ud \ud \ud With respect to PFS, 363 (89.2%) and 298 (89.5%) events were reported in the chemotherapy-denosumab and chemotherapy-alone arms, respectively, with corresponding medians 4.8 months (95%CI:[4.4–5.3]) and 4.9 months (95%CI:[4.3–5.4]). HR for PFS was 0.97 (95%CI:[0.83–1.15]; P = 0.76), indicating that no significant denosumab benefit existed for PFS.\ud \ud \ud \ud Conclusion\ud \ud In this pooled analysis, no statistically significant improvement was shown in PFS/OS with the combination of denosumab and chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC and no meaningful benefit in any of the subgroups.

Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer diagnosed during the gestational period (gp-PABC) or in the first postpartum year (pp-PABC). Despite its infrequent occurrence, the incidence of PABC appears to be rising due to the increasing propensity for women to delay childbirth. We have established the first retrospective registry study of PABC in Ireland to examine specific clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and maternal and foetal outcomes. This was a national, multi-site, retrospective observational study, including PABC patients treated in 12 oncology institutions from August 2001 to January 2020. Data extracted included information on patient demographics, tumour biology, staging, treatments, and maternal/foetal outcomes. Survival data for an age-matched breast cancer population over a similar time period was obtained from the National Cancer Registry of Ireland (NCRI). Standard biostatistical methods were used for analyses. We identified 155 patients—71 (46%) were gp-PABC and 84 (54%) were pp-PABC. The median age was 36 years. Forty-four patients (28%) presented with Stage III disease and 25 (16%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. High rates of triple-negative (25%) and HER2+ (30%) breast cancer were observed. We observed an inferior 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in our PABC cohort compared to an age-matched breast cancer population in both Stage I–III (77.6% vs 90.9%) and Stage IV disease (18% vs 38.3%). There was a low rate (3%) of foetal complications. PABC patients may have poorer survival outcomes. Further prospective data are needed to optimise management of these patients.

Background Older adults with cancer frequently have other co-morbidities requiring prescription pharmacotherapy. The objectives of this study were to identify the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), severe drug interactions (SDIs) and associated risk factors in these patients. Materials and Methods This twelve-month prospective observation study was conducted at an Irish Hospital. PIMs were identified in older adults (≥65 years) using STOPP and OncPal criteria; potential SDIs using Stockley's interaction checker. Results We enrolled 186 patients; mean age 72.5(SD5.7) years, 46.2% female, mean co-morbidities 7.5(SD3.4), median medications 7(IQR4–9). Polypharmacy (≥6 medications) and major polypharmacy (≥11 medications) were identified in 60.8% and 17.7% respectively. STOPP PIMs were observed in 73.1%; median 2(IQR1–3). The most common PIM identified was any drug prescribed beyond the recommended duration (46.5%). For each additional prescription, the odds of receiving a STOPP PIM increased by 79.2% (OR 1.792, 95% CI 1.459–2.02). Potential SDIs were identified in 50.5% participants. The most common were beta-blocker/alpha-blocker (6.5%), selective-serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI)/proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (5.9%) and SSRI/Aspirin (4.8%). For each additional prescription, the odds of an SDI increased by 50.8% (OR 1.508, 95% CI 1.288–1.764). Seventy-seven (41.4%) participants died within six months of enrolment. OncPal PIMs were observed in 81.8% of this cohort, median 2(IQR1–3). The most common OncPal PIM was statin therapy (38%). For each additional prescription, the odds of receiving an OncPal PIM increased by 38.2%, (OR 1.382, 95% CI 1.080–1.767). Conclusions PIMs and SDIs are common in this population. Comprehensive specialist evaluation of medications by a geriatrician may identify PIMs thereby reducing related adverse outcomes such as SDIs.

Introduction “Transgender” and “gender diverse” are umbrella terms encompassing those whose gender identities or expressions differ from those typically associated with the sex they were assigned at birth. There is scant global information on cancer incidence, outcome, and mortality for this cohort. This group may present with advanced cancer, have mistrust in health care services and report anxiety and depression at higher frequencies, a finding often seen in marginalized groups because of minority stress. Materials and Methods Medical oncologists were contacted by secure email to identify patients who self-identify as transgender and gender diverse in three Irish hospitals. Five patients were identified. A retrospective chart review was conducted and a pseudonymized patient survey was distributed. Results All patients included in our chart review (n = 5) were diagnosed with advanced disease on initial diagnosis. Two patients identified as men, two as women, and one as a transwoman. Two of five patients' health record charts reflected a name or gender change. Three patients had gender transitioning treatment postponed. Assessing comorbidities, it was seen that four patients required psychiatry input. Predominant issues noted in our patient survey by the two respondents (n = 2) were “mis-gendering,” lack of a gender-neutral hospital environment, lack of inclusion in cancer groups, and barriers in changing name and/or sex on hospital records. Conclusion Components of care requiring revision include patient accessible pathways to change names and gender on health records, earlier access to psychological support and targeted screening and support groups. Resources for hospital staff to improve awareness of correct terminology and to provide gender neutral facilities are worthwhile. Implications for Practice The implications for practice on an international level include patient-friendly pathways for changing hospital name and gender so that patients may feel comfortable using wristbands. The need for international screening guidelines for transgender patients and national transgender cancer support groups is highlighted. On a day-to-day level for providers, the correct use of pronouns makes a big difference to patients. Asking about preferred pronoun on first visit and noting on patient's file is worthwhile. It is important for providers to know that increased psychological support should be offered early on first clinic visit and engaged with as necessary when patient has a history of anxiety or depression. Providers should discuss openly that some gender transitioning treatment will be postponed because of cancer care and refer to both the physical and psychological sequelae of this. Asking transgender patients which room or bathroom they would prefer when rooms are gendered is essential.

Some studies indicate that survival of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer may be inferior to that of younger children with similar cancers, possibly related (in part) to differences in access to centralized or standardized treatment. This study aims to evaluate differences in survival for AYA patients when compared with paediatric patients treated in Ireland over a 20-year time period. This study compares relative survival for patients diagnosed in Ireland at ages 0–15 (paediatric group) and 16–24 (AYA group) during 1994–2013, followed to the end of 2014, for cancers defined by the International Classification of Childhood Cancer (ICCC) (Third Edition) group or subgroup. Five-year relative survival estimates, and excess hazard ratios (EHR) comparing excess mortality associated with a cancer diagnosis among AYA with that in the paediatric group, are presented. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Significantly higher excess mortality was found for AYA with leukaemias, lymphomas, astrocytomas, malignant bone tumours, and Ewing and related bone sarcomas, soft tissue sarcomas and ‘other/unspecified’ epithelial cancers, rhabdomyosarcomas, and ‘other and unspecified’ carcinomas. In contrast, lower excess mortality was found in the AYA group for all cancers and intracranial/intraspinal tumours, and for gliomas other than astrocytomas or ependymomas. Comparing 1994–2003 and 2004–2013 cohorts, age-related survival differences narrowed for lymphoid leukaemias, but widened for all cancers combined and intracranial/intraspinal tumours combined. Centralization of services varied depending upon cancer subtype, with leukaemias, CNS tumours and bone sarcomas most centralized. Within these, improvements in survival for leukaemias and CNS tumours have been seen for the AYA population. Reasons for age-related survival differences, and differences in time-trend by age group, are not clear. The significant narrowing of survival differences by age in more recent years for lymphoid leukaemias reflects a more marked recent increase in survival among AYA. More work is required to explain and improve other age-related survival differences.

Background:Smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival. Few studies have reported oncologists' cessation practice patterns, but differences between the curative and palliative settings have not been described. We aimed to study the oncologist's perceptions on patients' tobacco use, current practices and barriers to providing smoking cessation support, while distinguishing between treatment with curative (C) and palliative (P) intent. Methods:In 2019, an online 34-item survey was sent to approximately 6235 oncologists from 16 European countries. Responses were descriptively reported and compared by treatment setting. Results:Responses from 544 oncologists were included. Oncologists appeared to favour addressing tobacco in the curative setting more than in the palliative setting. Oncologists believe that continued smoking impacts treatment outcomes (C: 94%, P: 74%) and that cessation support should be standard cancer care (C: 95%, P: 63%). Most routinely assess tobacco use (C: 93%, P: 78%) and advise patients to stop using tobacco (C: 88%, P: 54%), but only 24% (P)-39% (C) routinely discuss medication options, and only 18% (P)-31% (C) provide cessation support. Hesitation to remove a pleasurable habit (C: 13%, P: 43%) and disbelieve on smoking affecting outcomes (C: 3%, P: 14%) were disparate barriers between the curative and palliative settings (p < 0.001), but dominant barriers of time, resources, education and patient resistance were similar between settings. Conclusion:Oncologists appear to favour addressing tobacco use more in the curative setting; however, they discuss medication options and/or provide cessation support in a minority of cases. All patients who report current smoking should have access to evidence-based smoking cessation support, also patients treated with palliative intent given their increasing survival.

De novo epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) resistance mutations in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive patients are rare when assessed by standard genotyping methods. Patients with EGFR mutations were identified using PCR-based fragment length analysis, mass spectrometry-based genotyping (Sequenom), and Sanger sequencing. From 2008 to 2015, we observed de novo EGFR resistance mutations in 12.8 patients who received an EGFR TKI with an overall response rate of 25%, median PFS 24 months, and median OS 34 months. Five patients (63%) received erlotinib in the first-line setting with a 60% disease control rate (DCR) and a median duration of response of 6 months (range 4–45 months). Three (37%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy in the first-line setting with 67% DCR and a median duration of response of 11 months (range 10–12 months). In patients with de novo EGFR T790M mutations, 50% (2/4) had stable disease with one patient having an ongoing response to erlotinib of over 96 months. In patients with de novo EGFR S768I mutations who received erlotinib, 50% (2/4) have ongoing partial responses at 30 and 6 months. This is the largest Irish review of de novo synchronous EGFR mutations. The incidence of co-occurring EGFR mutations in our cohort of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLCA) is 1% on routine assays. Erlotinib appears to have activity in this cohort in both in the first- and second-line setting. De novo S768I and T790M represent distinct clinical entities. For de novo T790M mutations cytotoxic chemotherapy may still be considered first line. For de novo S768I mutations, erlotinib appears to be a reasonable therapeutic option.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) offers a unique opportunity to assess tumor response to systemic agents. However, a discrepancy may exist between the response of the primary tumor and involved nodes. We report on the frequency of response discordance after NAT in breast cancer.All consecutive node-positive patients receiving NAT in our department from 2009 to 2014 were identified. Patient demographics, and radiologic and pathologic features were tabulated. Tumor response was estimated by magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Lymph node (LN) response was estimated from pathologic treatment response measurements. Statistical analysis was performed.A total of 108 node-positive patients treated with NAT were eligible for inclusion. Median age was 51.73 years (range, 20-87 years). All patients underwent axillary clearance, and 62% underwent mastectomy. A 40% mean reduction in tumor size was observed. Statistically, a positive correlation between tumor and LN response after NAT was observed (Spearman correlation coefficient, r = 0.46, P .001). Complete pathologic response was observed in 17 patients (15.7%). However, 21 patients experienced complete LN response, with only 81% of these patients (n = 17) experiencing a complete response in tumor also. A complete response was observed in tumor in 20 patients, and this predicted complete nodal response in 85% of cases (n = 17). Fifteen percent of primary tumors with complete pathologic response had persistently positive LNs.A significant discordance exists between the primary tumor and LN response, representing a concern for the lack of response of occult regional or systemic metastases due to potential biologic heterogeneity.

Background: In the treatment of advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, it is increasingly common UK practice to modify escalated BEACOPP (eBPP) by removing oral procarbazine and replacing it with intravenous dacarbazine (250mg/m2 D2-3) to reduce haematopoietic stem cell and gonadal toxicity. However, published data of the "escalated BEACOPDac (eBPDac)" regimen are very limited. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 225 patients from 20 centres in the UK, Ireland and France who were treated with eBPDac first line for advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. Toxicity outcomes were compared with 58 matched patients treated with eBPP at 4 UK centres and survival outcomes were compared with 2073 eBPP patients in the HD18 trial 1 and with 1088 patients aged 18-59y in the RATHL trial 2,3. Most eBPDac patients were treated as per HD18 protocol. The 34 patients treated in Paris followed the AHL2011 protocol with two courses of eBPDac given upfront and if iPET2 negative were deescalated to 4 cycles of ABVD. Toxicity outcomes: Toxicity was compared between eBPDac patients (n=225; median follow-up 22.1 months) and matched real-world UK eBPP patients (n=58; median follow-up 52.7 months) over the first 4 cycles. eBPP and eBPDac patients were well matched with no significant differences in age (median 23 y vs 26 y), sex, stage (stage 3/4 82% vs 83%) and international prognostic score (IPS 3+ 74% vs 65%). 55% of eBPDac patients received only 4 cycles (vs 12% of eBPP patients; p Disease outcomes: The eBPDac patients (n=225) were younger than the HD18 patients (median age 26 y vs 35 y, p Figure 1 shows Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The PFS at 22 months (median follow-up) of eBPDac patients was 94.9% (91.7-98.3%) which is similar to HD18 3 year PFS of 92.3% (91.1-93.5%) and appears superior to RATHL 5 year PFS 81.4% (78.9-83.7%). The difference in PFS between eBPDac and RATHL is most marked in IPS3+ patients. The OS rates with all 3 regimens are excellent, with 22 month eBPDac OS estimate of 98.9% (97.4-100%). Summary/Conclusion: Accepting the limitations of a retrospective study, we suggest that substituting dacarbazine for procarbazine is unlikely to compromise the efficacy of eBPP and may have some toxicity benefits. Despite the clear preference of clinicians to offer this regimen to high-risk advanced stage patients, with nearly 2 years median follow-up we have observed similar PFS and OS compared to HD18 but superior survival estimates compared with 18-59y RATHL patients, suggesting that eBPDac is highly efficacious for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma. References: 1Borchmann P et al. Lancet 2017; 390:2790-2802 2Johnson P et al. NEJM. 2016; 374:2419-2429 3Russell J et al. Ann Hematol 2021; 100:1049-1058 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brice: MSD: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Takeda: Research Funding. Menne: Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Travel grants; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grants; Bayer: Other: Travel grants; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Travel grants; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Atara: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Other: Honoraria for Lectures; Roche: Other: Honoraria for Lectures. Osborne: Roche: Other; Takeda: Other; Pfizer: Other; Servier: Other; Gilead: Other; Novartis: Other; MSD: Other. Ardeshna: Gilead, Beigene, Celegene, Novartis and Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead, Beigene, Celegene, Novartis and Roche: Honoraria; Norvartis, BMS, Autolus, ADCT, Pharmocyclics and Jansen: Research Funding. Collins: Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celleron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau. Cwynarski: Adienne, Takeda, Roche, Autolus, KITE, Gilead, Celgene, Atara, Janssenen: Other. Davies: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioInvent: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding. Furtado: Abbvie: Other: Conference support. Gallop-Evans: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iyengar: Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: conference support; Janssen: Other: conference support, Speakers Bureau. Linton: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Hartley Taylor: Honoraria; University of Manchester: Current Employment; Celgene: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Martinez-Calle: Abbvie: Other. McKay: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; KITE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nagumantry: Takeda, Alexion, Abbvie: Other. Shah: Abbvie, Janssen and Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Uttenthal: Jazz: Other; Takeda: Other; Roche: Other. McMillan: Pfizer: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Follows: Janssen, Abvie, Roche, AZ: Other.

Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is uncommon but is associated with poor outcomes. In selected high risk patients (pts), high dose methotrexate (HDMTX) is often used as CNS prophylaxis with frontline (1L) DLBCL therapy despite uncertain efficacy, optimum dose and timing of delivery. A recent UK study (Wilson et al 2020) showed that intercalated HDMTX (i-HDMTX) was associated with increased toxicity and R-CHOP delays compared to end of treatment (EOT) delivery. Although hypothesis generating, the study size was insufficient to determine whether EOT was non-inferior in terms of CNS relapse risk. Methods: We conducted an international, multicentre retrospective analysis of consecutive DLBCL or high grade BCL pts between 2007-20 from 47 centers in Europe, Australia and N. America. Pts were included if they received R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like 1L therapy with curative intent as well as HDMTX CNS prophylaxis (≥1 cycle). Concurrent intrathecal (IT) prophylaxis was permitted. Pts with known CNS involvement at baseline and those treated with more intensive protocols (e.g. R-DA-EPOCH) were excluded. i-HDMTX was defined as any pt receiving a HD-MTX cycle before the final R-CHOP cycle. CNS relapse events were excluded if occurring after first systemic lymphoma relapse/progression. Time to event endpoints were measured from diagnosis to first event or censor and analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. Time to CNS relapse was analysed using competing risk Fine and Gray method (for death and non-synchronous systemic relapse). To mitigate for possible immortality bias in the EOT arm, a landmark analysis for pts alive and free from progression at 6 months was conducted. We aimed to exclude a 5% difference in 2-year (y) CNS relapse rates. Results: 1,384 pts were analysed. 750 received i-HDMTX and 634 received EOT HDMTX. Key baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1. Median follow up was 37.9 months. 44.2% had high CNS IPI (4-6) with no significant difference between i-HDMTX and EOT groups (45.1% vs 43.1%, p=0.087). ≥2 cycles of HDMTX were used in 86.6% with no difference between groups (85.6% vs 87.9%, p=0.22). Concurrent IT prophylaxis use was higher for EOT pts (55.6% vs 38.1% p 78 CNS relapses (42 i-HDMTX, 36 EOT) were observed: parenchymal in 41 (53%), parenchymal and leptomeningeal in 16 (21%) and isolated leptomeningeal in 21 (27%). There was no significant difference in 2y CNS relapse rates between i-HDMTX and EOT in all pts: 5.2% vs 3.9%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% CI 0.58-1.47), p=0.74, 2y difference -0.2% (-2.0-2.5) or landmark analysis: 2.8% vs 4.1%, HR: 0.93 (0.56-1.55), p=0.79, 2y difference: -0.3% (-1.8-2.2%) (Fig 1a/b). Exploratory analyses focusing on pts with isolated CNS relapse (n=57) demonstrated similar results (2y rates 3.6% vs 3.0%, p=0.99). On multivariable analysis (MVA) of risk factors for CNS relapse, renal/adrenal involvement was the only variable associated with increased CNS relapse risk (adjusted HR 1.74 (1.03-2.92), p=0.038). Notably, IT prophylaxis was not associated with reduction in CNS relapse. In 600 high CNS IPI (4-6) pts, there was no difference in CNS relapse risk between i-HD-MTX and EOT (3y rates 9.4% vs 8.6%, HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.52-1.62)). In a composite high risk group including CNS IPI 4-6 and/or any of the following: ≥3 extranodal sites, renal, adrenal, testicular or breast involvement (n=885) there was no difference in 3y CNS relapse rates between groups (i-HDMTX 7.6% vs EOT 7.4%, HR 0.94 (0.58-1.53)). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the i-HDMTX and EOT groups were as follows: 3y PFS 70.7% vs 76.7% (p=0.098), 3y OS 79.9% vs 87.0% (p=0.0016). However, there were no PFS/OS differences between groups on landmark analysis (n=1259) (Fig 1c). On analysis of pts experiencing ≥1 R-CHOP delay of ≥7 days, use of i-HDMTX was the only factor on MVA associated with increased delays (p Discussion: We found no evidence that EOT delivery increases CNS relapse risk when compared to i-HDMTX in this large analysis of pts treated with 1L R-CHOP. Delays to R-CHOP cycles were increased with i-HDMTX. Findings in a high risk subgroup were unchanged and rates of CNS relapse in this HDMTX treated group were similar to published comparable high risk cohorts receiving infrequent CNS prophylaxis. Where HDMTX prophylaxis is used, delivery could be deferred until R-CHOP completion. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wilson: Takeda: Other: Conference fees; Janssen: Other: Conference fees; Abbvie: Honoraria. Eyre: Janssen: Honoraria; Secura Bio: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/KITE: Honoraria, Other: Travel support for conferences, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel to conferences; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Beigene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ahearne: Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Schorb: Roche: Research Funding; Riemser Pharma GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Ku: Antegene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Genor Biopharma: Consultancy. Narkhede: Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Genmab: Other: Medical writing support, Research Funding; TG Therapeautics: Research Funding. Lewis: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Øvlisen: Abbvie: Other: Travel expenses. Santarsiere: Janssen: Honoraria. Shah: Abbvie, Janssen and Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Roulin: Janssen: Other: Travel and meetings. Manos: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Travel and meetings. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Lopez-Garcia: Roche: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Travel and accommodation grants; Janssen: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Advisor, Travel and accommodation grants, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Speaker Honoraria, Advisor, Travel and accommodation grants; Celgene: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Fresenius: Other: Speaker Honoraria; Novonordisk: Other: Speaker Honoraria. El-Galaly: ROCHE Ltd: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Abbvie: Other: Speakers fee. Cheah: Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; AbbVie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Loxo/Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory and travel expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory; Ascentage pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: advisory. Ferreri: Gilead, Novartis, Juno, PletixaPharm, Roche, Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS, Beigene, Pharmacyclics, Hutchison Medipharma, Amgen, Genmab, ADC Therapeutics, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer: Research Funding. Fox: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: speaker fees. Cwynarski: Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Atara: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences; Roche: Consultancy, Other: travel to scientific conferences, Speakers Bureau; BMS/Celgene: Other: travel to scientific conferences. McKay: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; KITE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Beigene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Some studies indicate that survival of AYAs with cancer may be inferior to that of younger children with similar cancers, possibly related (in part) to differences in access to centralised or standardised treatments. We sought to examine the comparative survival of paediatric & AYA patients in Ireland across a 20-year period. Methods Using the National Cancer Registry Ireland (NCRI) database, all patients diagnosed with a sarcoma age 0–24 between 1994–2014 were identified. Survival was based on matching of cases against national death certificate data complete up to 31 December 2014 &amp grouped in 2 diagnostic cohorts: 1994–2003 and 2004–2014 and examined according to the ICCC. Results 577 patients less than 25 years were diagnosed with a sarcoma between 1994–2014; 321 under 15. Significantly poorer survival was noted for the AYA patients compared with paediatric patients for the following sarcoma groups and diagnosis periods Malignant bone tumours, 1994–2013 (EHR 1.62, 1.05–2.48, P=0.026) and 1994–2003 (EHR 1.87, 1.05–3.33, P=0.032); Ewing & related tumours), 1994–2013 (EHR 2.04, 95% CI 1.11–3.72, P=0.021) and 1994–2003 (EHR 2.68, 95% CI 1.22–5.87, P=0.014); Soft tissue sarcomas), 1994–2013 (EHR 2.14, 1.29–3.53, P=0.03) and 2004–2013 (EHR 2.52, 1.20–5.25, P=0.014). Conclusions This study highlights the disparities that exist in outcomes for AYA patients with sarcomas treated in Ireland. The exact cause for this is unclear and is likely multifactorial, possibly owing to lack of standardised/centralised services. Future development on a national level is imperative.

Purpose: Therapeutic regimens for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) are limited with unsatisfactory results, thereby warranting development of novel therapies. This study investigated antitumor activity and toxicity of alemtuzumab with regard to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with human T-cell lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1)-associated ATL. Experimental Design: Twenty-nine patients with chronic, acute, and lymphomatous types of ATL were enrolled in a single-institution, nonrandomized, open-label phase II trial wherein patients received intravenous alemtuzumab 30 mg three times weekly for a maximum of 12 weeks. Results: Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The overall objective response was 15 of 29 patients [95% confidence interval (CI), 32.5%–70.6%]. The 15 patients who responded manifested a median time to response of 1.1 months. Median response duration was 1.4 months for the whole group and 14.5 months among responders. Median progression-free survival was 2.0 months. Median overall survival was 5.9 months. The most common adverse events were 2 with vasovagal episodes (7%) and 3 with hypotensive episodes (10%), leukopenia (41%) grade 3 and (17%) grade 4, lymphocytopenia (59%) grade 3, neutropenia (31%) grade 3, anemia (24%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). All patients developed cytomegalovirus antigenemia (CMV). Three were symptomatic and all responded to antiviral therapy. Grade 3 or 4 infections were reported in 4 (14%) of patients. Conclusions: Alemtuzumab induced responses in patients with acute HTLV-1–associated ATL with acceptable toxicity, but with short duration of responses. These studies support inclusion of alemtuzumab in novel multidrug therapies for ATL. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 35–42. ©2016 AACR.

We set out to determine whether a difference exists between levels of psychological distress in women diagnosed with breast cancer through routine screening versus those who presented symptomatically. We assessed levels of distress in comparable numbers of patients with screen-detected and non-screen-detected female breast cancer patients being treated with curative intent, using the Hospital Anxiety and Distress Scale (HADS) (total n = 93). In both cohorts, 50.5% scored above threshold for anxiety, depression, or both. Being aged over 60 was associated with concomitant positive anxiety and depression screening in both cohorts. Financial stress was associated with positive depression scores. No statistically significant difference was found between HADS scores for screen-detected versus self-detected patients. Over 50% of patients with screen-detected or symptomatic breast cancer experience high levels of distress. Consideration should be made for the routine use of distress screening in this population.

Introduction Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is the continuous administration of low dose chemotherapy. It has significant clinical efficacy with minimal toxicity as compared to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Thus represents an attractive treatment modality in selected patients with advanced breast cancer. Methods Patients who received MCT in the form of Capecitabine/Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of advanced breast cancer between May 2014 and October 2018 in Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Sweden and in Cork University Hospital, University Hospital Kerry and the South Infirmary-Victoria University Hospital in Ireland were identified. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect data. All survival analyses were described by Kaplan-Meier curves and analysed with log-rank tests. The primary end-point was time on treatment, used as a surrogate marker for efficacy. Results 148 patients were identified (84 – Sweden, 64 – Ireland), with a median age of 64.2 (range 31–89). The overall mean time on treatment for all patients in both countries is 9.05 months (range 0.36 – 67.21). In patients with bone only disease the mean time on treatment was 10.1 months (range 0.7 – 67.2), compared to patients with visceral disease of 8.91 months (range 0.36 – 39.77). Treatment was ended in the majority of patients because of progression of disease, representing 108 patients (72.9%). Conclusion This is an observational, retrospective study demonstrating the real world effectiveness of MCT in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. In this cohort of unselected pre-treated patients, the efficacy of MCT was comparable with the survival outcomes of landmark clinical trials.

Background the last year of life for many older people is associated with high symptom burden and frequent hospitalizations. Hospital physicians have an opportunity to prioritize essential medications and deprescribe potentially futile medications. Objective to measure medication consumption during hospitalization in the last year of life and the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) at hospital discharge. Design retrospective chart review. Setting acute hospital. Subjects ≥65 years, hospitalized in the last year of life. Methods medication consumption was determined by examining hospital Medication Administration Records. PIMs were defined using STOPPFrail deprescribing criteria. Results the study included 410 patients. The mean age of participants was 80.8, 49.3% were female, and 63.7% were severely frail. The median number of days spent in hospital in the last year of life was 32 (interquartile range 15-59). During all hospitalizations, the mean number of individual medications consumed was 23.8 (standard deviation 10.1). One-in-six patients consumed 35 or more medications in their last year. Over 80% of patients were prescribed at least one PIM at discharge and 33% had ≥3 PIMs. Lipid-lowering medications, proton pump inhibitors, anti-psychotics and calcium supplements accounted for 59% of all PIMs. Full implementation of STOPPFrail recommendations would have resulted in one-in-four long-term medications being discontinued. Conclusion high levels of medication consumption in the last year of life not only reflect high symptom burden experienced by patients but also continued prescribing of futile medications. Physicians assisted by the STOPPFrail tool can reduce medication burden for older people approaching end of life.

Despite significant advances in the treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), a significant proportion of patients will not respond or will subsequently relapse. We identified CD25, the IL-2 receptor alpha subunit, as a favorable target for systemic radioimmunotherapy of HL. The scientific basis for the clinical trial was that, although most normal cells with exception of Treg cells do not express CD25, it is expressed by a minority of Reed-Sternberg cells and by most polyclonal T cells rosetting around Reed-Sternberg cells. Forty-six patients with refractory and relapsed HL were evaluated with up to seven i.v. infusions of the radiolabeled anti-CD25 antibody (90)Y-daclizumab. (90)Y provides strong β emissions that kill tumor cells at a distance by a crossfire effect. In 46 evaluable HL patients treated with (90)Y-daclizumab there were 14 complete responses and nine partial responses; 14 patients had stable disease, and nine progressed. Responses were observed both in patients whose Reed-Sternberg cells expressed CD25 and in those whose neoplastic cells were CD25(-) provided that associated rosetting T cells expressed CD25. As assessed using phosphorylated H2AX (γ-H2AX) as a bioindicator of the effects of radiation exposure, predominantly nonmalignant cells in the tumor microenvironment manifested DNA damage, as reflected by increased expression of γ-H2AX. Toxicities were transient bone-marrow suppression and myelodysplastic syndrome in six patients who had not been evaluated with bone-marrow karyotype analyses before therapy. In conclusion, repeated (90)Y-daclizumab infusions directed predominantly toward nonmalignant T cells rosetting around Reed-Sternberg cells provided meaningful therapy for select HL patients.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) herpesvirus-associated multicentric Castleman disease (KSHV-MCD) is a lymphoproliferative disorder, most commonly seen in HIV-infected patients, that has a high mortality if untreated. Concurrent KS is common. Although rituximab has reported activity in KSHV-MCD, its use is often associated with KS progression. Within a natural history study of KSHV-MCD, we prospectively evaluated rituximab 375 mg/m(2) combined with liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m(2) (R-Dox) every 3 weeks in 17 patients. Patients received a median of 4 cycles (range 3-9). All received antiretroviral therapy, 11 received consolidation interferon-α, and 6 received consolidation high-dose zidovudine with valganciclovir. Using NCI KSHV-MCD response criteria, major clinical and biochemical responses were attained in 94% and 88% of patients, respectively. With a median 58 months' potential follow-up, 3-year event-free survival was 69% and 3-year overall survival was 81%. During R-Dox therapy, cutaneous KS developed in 1 patient, whereas 5 of 6 patients with it had clinical improvement. R-Dox was associated with significant improvement in anemia and hypoalbuminemia. KSHV viral load, KSHV viral interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, human interleukin-6, and serum immunoglobulin free light chains decreased with therapy. R-Dox is effective in symptomatic KSHV-MCD and may be useful in patients with concurrent KS. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00092222.

Introduction Since interim results from the EuroNet-PHL-C1 study1were published in 2013 showing that the gonadotoxic drug procarbazine in COPP can be safely replaced with dacarbazine (COPDac) it is increasingly common practice to modify escalated BEACOPP (eBPP) by removing oral procarbazine and replacing it with intravenous dacarbazine (250mg/m2 D2-3), hoping to reduce haematopoietic stem cell and gonadal toxicity. However, published data of 'escalated BEACOPDac (eBPDac)' regimen are very limited. Methods We collected retrospective data from 15 centres in the UK, Ireland and France, that offer eBPDac therapy for first line advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma, and compared outcomes with matched patients treated with eBPP at 4 UK centres. Most patients were treated as per HD15 or HD18 protocol. The 24 patients treated in Paris followed the AHL2011 protocol with two courses of eBPDac given upfront and if iPET2 negative were deescalated to 4 cycles of ABVD. Results From 2009, 141 patients were managed first line with either eBPP (n=52) or eBPDac (n=89) with median follow-up 40 months for eBPP and 12.7 months for eBPDac patients. Patients were well matched with no significant differences in age (median: 28), sex, stage (stage 3/4: 82%) and international prognostic score (IPS3+:65%). More patients treated with eBPDac received only 4 cycles of treatment (43% vs 12%; p Toxicity was compared over the first 4 cycles. There was no difference in day 8 ALT between the two regimens although the mean day 8 neutrophil count was lower in eBPDac than eBPP patients (1.84 vs 2.35; p=0.043; G-CSF given day 9). There was a trend to fewer non-elective days of in-patient care for eBPDac compared with eBPP (mean: 2.78 vs 6.00; p=0.0846), and eBPDac patients received fewer red cell transfusions during cycles 1 to 4 compared with eBPP patients (Mean 1.87 units vs 4.33 units; p 6 months post chemotherapy follow-up had a similar rate of return of menstrual cycles (eBPP: 20/21; eBPDac: 13/16), although eBPDac patients appeared to restart menstruation earlier post chemotherapy completion (mean: 3.85 months vs 8.65 months, p=0.0018). However, this could also reflect the higher mean chemotherapy cycle number completed by the eBPP women (5.86 vs 4.67; p Conclusions Accepting the limitations of a retrospective study, we suggest that substituting dacarbazine for procarbazine is unlikely to compromise the efficacy of eBPP in frontline therapy of patients with advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma and may have some toxicity benefits. As it is highly unlikely that this single drug substitution will ever be tested in a prospective trial, publishing real-world data from eBPDac patients is important. References 1. EuroNet-PHL-C1 study interim report published 14/08/2013 http://www.anzchog.org/docs/public-resources/euronet-recommendation.pdf?sfvrsn=0 2. Borchmann P et al. 2018;390:2790-2802 Disclosures Brice: BMS: Honoraria; Takeda France: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Menne:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Osborne:Novartis: Other: Travel; Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Speakers Bureau. Ardeshna:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Collins:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cwynarski:Adienne: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: conference and travel support , Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: conference and travel support, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche,: Consultancy, Other: conference and travel support, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Consultancy; KITE: Consultancy; Atara: Consultancy; Janssen: Other: conference and travel support, Speakers Bureau. Iyengar:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Martinez-Calle:ABBVIE: Other: Travel support. McKay:Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria. Nagumantry:Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria. Shah:Abbvie: Consultancy. Uttenthal:Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria. McMillan:BMS: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Follows:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AZ: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

11531 Background: In the era of cytotoxic chemotherapy, aggressive cancer treatment and hospitalization at the end of life (EOL) has been associated with a worse quality of death. Meanwhile, in the era of immunotherapy (IO), little is known of the impact of these novel agents on EOL care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the EOL care of metastatic cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients prescribedPD1/L1 or CTLA-4 antibodies in Cork University Hospital (CUH) and Mercy University Hospital (MUH) between January 2013 to December 2018. Patients treated on a clinical trial were excluded. Results: We identified 224 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (outside of a clinical trial) in CUH and MUH over the described 6 year period. 108 of these patients were deceased, 102 electronic files were available for analysis. Of the 102 patients, 57 had metastatic melanoma, 33 non small cell lung cancer, 8 renal cell carcinoma, 4 had other advanced malignancies. 43% were female and 57% were male. 6% of patients had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 at diagnosis, 80% PS of 1 and 10% PS of 2. Median age at death was 62 years. 47 patients were treated with pembrolizumab, 26 nivolumab, 25 ipilimumab, 2 nivolumab/ipilimumab and 2 received atezolizumab. 29 patients received IO as first line treatment, 50 as second line, 17 as third line and 6 as fourth line. Median number of IO cycles received was 4 (range 1 - 41). Progression of disease (62%) and declining performance status (14%) were the most common reasons for discontinuation of IO treatment. 16 of the 102 patients received a further line of systemic therapy. Median time from last dose of IO to death was 57 days. 20 patients (20%) died within 30 days of last dose of IO. Of these 20 patients, the median number of cycles of IO received was 2 (range 1-7), 8 of these 20 patients received one cycle of IO only. 39 patients (38%) attended the ED in the last month of life. 47 (46%) patients had at least one hospital admission in the last month of life, the median hospital length of stay was 6 days (range 1-30) and 22 patients died in hospital. 94% of patients were referred to palliative care, the median time from palliative care referral to death was 64 days (range 1- 1010), 62% of patients died in hospice. Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer treated with immunotherapy have high rates of hospital admissions and ED attendances despite early palliative care involvement. 20% of patients died within 30 days of IO. More research is needed to help physicians identify patients who are least likely to benefit from IO so as not to treat futile cases.

e20704 Background: Efficient use of immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been limited by the lack of a definitive predictive biomarker. Recently considerable efforts have been invested to develop biomarkers to predict which patients should receive immune checkpoint inhibitors. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether clinical factors and inflammation-based biological markers such as pre-treatment derived neutrophils to lymphocytes (dNLR) ratio, platelets to lymphocytes (PLR) ratio and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were associated with outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Methods: This study was a multicentered, retrospective systematic review. Clinical and electronic records were retrospectively examined from metastatic NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy from August of 2015 to September 2018 in 2 regional cancer centers and a total of 69 patients were enrolled. NLR ≥5 and PLR ≥260 were defined as elevated and PNI ≤35 was defined as reduced. Results: Approximately, 57% of patients had NLR ≤ 5 and 51% had PLR ≤260. We found utilising univariant analysis, that pretreatment NLR ≤ 5 was independently associated with superior OS (median 12.4 vs. 6.8 months; HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.66-2.6; p = 0.007) and PFS (median 3.55 vs. 2.6 months; HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.18-2.32; p = 0.024). Results were similar when examining PLR ≤260 median OS 13.64 vs. 7.36 months; HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.1-3.5; p = 0.028) The optimal cutoff for PNI was designated to be 35. The majority (87%) had PNI > 35. NSCLC patients with PNI > 35 were found to have significantly higher median OS compared to patients with PNI ≤35 (11.11 vs. 2.4 months; HR 5.36, 95% CI ; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Immunotherapy is considered as an effective new method to treat advanced NSCLC. In this cohort of patients pretreatment NLR < 5,PLR < 260 and PNI > 35 were associated with superior outcomes. It is unclear whether these markers are predictive or prognostic or both.

In this article, the authors explore the consequences of an American 1930s classic anthropological study for a contemporary rural community in the west of Ireland. The contribution of family, kin, and community relations to sustaining a rural way of life was the primary focus of Arensberg and Kimball’s study of Irish farm families published as Family and Community in Ireland. Through the frame of a collaborative community research project with an artist, sociologist, and the descendents of the families written about, we present an account of a research project based on Kimball’s 1930s field diary that provided an opportunity for community members to tell their own story of family and community in the 21st century. Deploying a narrative inquiry approach, the power of local stories to interrupt dominant narratives of family and community is explored.

Background : Social inequalities in pregnancy outcomes have been extensively described but studies that explain these inequalities comprehensively are lacking. This analysis evaluated the contribution of material, psychosocial, behavioural, nutritional and obstetrical factors in explaining social inequalities in preterm delivery. Methods: The data were based on a prospective cohort of 1109 Irish pregnant women. Preterm delivery was obtained from clinical hospital records. Socio-economic status was measured using educational level. The contribution of the above factors in explaining the association between educational level and preterm delivery was examined using Cox models. Results : Educational level was found to be a significant predictive factor of preterm delivery; women with low educational level were more likely to have a preterm delivery [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.14, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.04–4.38)] after adjustment for age and parity. Rented and crowded home, smoking, alcohol consumption and intake of saturated fatty acids displayed educational differences and were predictive of preterm delivery. Material factors (rented and crowded home) reduced the HR of preterm delivery for low compared with highest educated women by 33%. The additional independent contribution of behavioural factors (smoking and alcohol consumption) was 5% and of saturated fatty acids intake was 4%. All these factors combined reduced the HR of preterm delivery for low educated women by 42% (HR = 1.66, 95% CI: 0.76–3.63). Conclusion : This study underlines the importance of material, behavioural and nutritional factors in explaining social inequalities in preterm delivery. These findings have cross-sectoral public policy implications.

e21196Background: Immunotherapy (IO) has improved outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients in randomized clinical trials. Data on outcomes for these agents outside of a clinical trial setting in Ireland...