1. Family intervention for children with functional somatic symptoms:A systematic review
- Author
-
Hulgaard, Ditte Roth, Dehlholm-Lambertsen, Birgitte, and Rask, Charlotte Ulrikka
- Abstract
Ditte Hulgaard, 1. Reservelæge, PhD stud. (1); dhulgaard@health.sdu.dk Gitte Dehlholm, overlæge, PhD (1); mailto:Gitte.Dehlholm@rsyd.dk Charlotte Ulrikka Rask Overlæge, PhD (2); mailto:charrask@rm.dk (1) Børne- og ungdomspsykiatrisk afdeling Odense; SDU (2) Forskningsklinikken for funktionelle lidelser, Århus; Århus universitet Aim & Background: Functional somatic symptoms (FSS) can be defined as physical symptoms that cannot be fully explained by organic pathology. FSS are prevalent in children worldwide and in all medical settings, and when severe, pose a major burden on those with FSS and on society. In clinical practice and current research in child mental health, focus on family factors is increasing. The aim of this systematic review was to explore and describe the current family based approaches used for youngsters with FSS, and to evaluate the quality of the existing research in this area. Method: The review was conducted with reference to the PRISMA guidelines. A protocol was published in advance on PROSPERO. The individual study quality was assessed by the standardised Psychotherapy outcome study methodology rating form – revised (POMF – R) followed by an overall descriptive synthesis of the findings. Results: This review included sixteen papers based on fifteen studies that delivered family therapy to youngsters with FSS. The majority of the participants were diagnosed with functional somatic syndromes (pain and CFS) and the family based treatments were primarily based on CBT and the remaining on systemic therapy. Heterogeneity across the studies was found with regards to a number of issues such as amount of therapy, focus of therapy, settings and profession of therapist. The studies varied with regard to overall quality with the newer studies on family based CBT obtaining the best quality scores on the POMRF. Many different outcome measures were employed, and the outcome measures chosen did not necessarily reflect what was targeted in the therapy. Focus on illness beliefs and shifting focus away from an organic explanation was agreed upon in all studies, with the alternative explanations being influenced by the psychological foundation of the applied treatment. Conclusions: Research on family interventions for youngsters with FSS is limited. The existing studies are heterogeneous and have methodological limitations. There is consensus on the importance of targeting the family’s illness beliefs. The role of family factors in the management of FSS in children is still unclear. Implications will be discussed.
- Published
- 2016