Search

RATIONALE: Injury to alveolar epithelial cells is central to the pathophysiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). An abnormal autoimmune response directed against antigens of the alveolar epithelium may contribute to the disease. OBJECTIVES: To detect circulating autoantibodies (autoAbs) directed against epithelial structures. METHODS: We performed immunoblot by separating human placental amnion extract or alveolar epithelial cell (A549 cell line) proteins on polyacrylamide gels, blotting on nitrocellulose membranes, and incubating with serum from patients with IPF (n = 40) or healthy subjects (n = 40). Proteomic analysis and mass spectrometry characterized the target protein. Inhibition experiments performed with the correspondent recombinant protein confirmed our results. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified IgG autoAbs recognizing a 200-kD protein in the serum of patients with IPF. Proteomic analysis identified this protein as human periplakin (PPL), a component of desmosomes. Anti-PPL Abs were found by immunoblot in both serum and bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with IPF: 16/40 (40%) of them were positive versus none of the control subjects. Immunohistochemistry revealed that PPL was strongly expressed in bronchial and alveolar epithelium, but that PPL exhibited changes in intracellular localization among normal and fibrotic alveolar epithelium. In an alveolar epithelial wound repair assay, an anti-PPL IgG decreased cell migration. Recombinant PPL induced bronchoalveolar lavage T lymphocyte proliferation. Patients with IPF with anti-PPL Abs had a more severe respiratory disease, despite no difference in survival. CONCLUSIONS: We found a new circulating autoAb directed against PPL in patients with IPF, associated with a more severe disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main monogenic causes of pulmonary fibrosis in adults are mutations in telomere-related genes. These mutations may be associated with extrapulmonary signs (hepatic, haematological and dermatological) and typically present radiologically as usual interstitial pneumonia or unclassifiable fibrosis. In children, the monogenic causes of pulmonary fibrosis are dominated by mutations in surfactant-related genes. These mutations are not associated with extrapulmonary signs and often manifest radiologically as unclassifiable fibrosis with cysts that can lead to chest wall deformities in adults. This review discusses these mutations, along with most of the monogenic causes of interstitial lung disease, including interferon-related genes, mutations in genes causing cystic lung disease, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, lysinuric protein intolerance and lysosomal storage disorders, and their pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports consultancy fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Ferrer and Sanofi, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, and support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim. L. Berteloot and C. Kannengiesser have nothing to disclose. M. Griese reports grants from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Boehringer Ingelheim. A. Cazes reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim. B. Crestani reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consultancy fees from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, GSK and Sanofi, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi, support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Sanofi, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Horizon and Sanofi, and a leadership role with Fondation du Souffle (President of the board of trustees). A. Hadchouel has nothing to disclose. M.P. Debray reports consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Bracco, and support for attending meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in primary Sjögren's disease (pSD); its functional course is poorly known. Our aim was to characterise the long-term functional course and prognosis in patients with pSD-ILD. We determined the role of baseline demographic and clinical variables in the evolution of lung function and identified risk factors for death or transplantation., Methods: In a retrospective observational cohort study, patients with pSD and ILD were retrospectively identified from two French ILD centres. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide ( D LCO ) slopes were obtained from joint models. Latent class mixed models identified clusters of FVC and D LCO trajectories., Results: We included 73 patients (63% women, mean age 63 years), with a median follow-up of 9.3 years. At baseline, mean FVC was 73±21% and D LCO 51±16%. On average, FVC was stable, while there was an annual decline in D LCO of 1% of the predicted value. Male sex, a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) or indeterminate for UIP on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and features of fibrosis on HRCT, were associated with an accelerated decline in FVC and D LCO ., Conclusion: We identified clusters of lung function evolution. 1) Two FVC trajectories: patients with stable FVC (n=56, 78%); patients with FVC decline (n=16, 22%) of 2.4% per year, characterised by a low baseline D LCO (39%) and a higher risk of death or transplantation (HR 52, 95% CI 10-273). 2) Three D LCO trajectories: patients with stable D LCO (n=44, 66%); patients with a slow decline in D LCO (n=12, 18%) of 2.8% per year; patients with a rapid decline in D LCO (n=11, 16%) of 4.8% per year, characterised by a low baseline D LCO (41%) and a higher risk of death or transplantation (HR 156, 95% CI 18-1352)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray declares honoraria for lectures or presentations from Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Borie declares relationships and activities with Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer, Sanofi, Chiesi and Roche. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes declares consulting fees, honoraria for lectures or presentations, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work; and reports participation on a data safety monitoring board with Galapagos. Conflict of interest: Y. Uzunhan reports relationships and activities with Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline and Oxyvie. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani reports relationships and activities with Boehringer Ingelheim, BristolMyersSquibb, Unimed, AstraZeneca, Glycocore, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Menarini, CSL Behring, Chiesi, Novartis and Sanofi; and is member of the board of trustees of the Fondation du Souffle, a French charity. Conflict of interest: The remaining authors have no relationships or activities to declare., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Introduction: Methotrexate (MTX) is a folate antagonist used as an immunosuppressant in a number of conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Low-dose MTX (MTX-LD) is associated with a risk of haematological, hepatic, gastrointestinal and pulmonary toxicity, which may up until now have limited its use., State of the Art: In RA, data from retrospective cohorts have reported a possible excess risk of methotrexate toxicity in cases of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD). However, recent prospective and retrospective multicentre studies have found no such increased risk, and have reassuringly concluded that MTX-LD can be prescribed in cases of RA-associated ILD (RA-ILD)., Perspectives and Conclusions: Current recommendations are not to delay the introduction of MTX in patients with RA at risk of developing ILD or in the presence of RA-ILD with mild to moderate respiratory impairment., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The identification of extra-pulmonary symptoms plays a crucial role in diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD). These symptoms not only indicate autoimmune diseases but also hint at potential genetic disorders, suggesting a potential overlap between genetic and autoimmune origins., Recent Findings: Genetic factors contributing to ILD are predominantly associated with telomere (TRG) and surfactant-related genes. While surfactant-related gene mutations typically manifest with pulmonary involvement alone, TRG mutations were initially linked to syndromic forms of pulmonary fibrosis, known as telomeropathies, which may involve hematological and hepatic manifestations with variable penetrance. Recognizing extra-pulmonary signs indicative of telomeropathy should prompt the analysis of TRG mutations, the most common genetic cause of familial pulmonary fibrosis. Additionally, various genetic diseases causing ILD, such as alveolar proteinosis, alveolar hemorrhage, or unclassifiable pulmonary fibrosis, often present as part of syndromes that include hepatic, hematological, or skin disorders., Summary: This review explores the main genetic conditions identified over the past two decades., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Sarcoidosis can manifest with atypical findings on chest computed tomography (CT). Cysts are a rare manifestation of lung sarcoidosis. The aim of the study was to describe a series of patients with cystic sarcoidosis and their clinical-radiological characteristics and progression., Methods: In this retrospective, bicentric study we recruited all patients affected by sarcoidosis with lung cystic lesions at chest CT. We collected clinical characteristics, pulmonary tests and tracked number, distribution and size of the cysts at diagnosis and at the last evaluation., Results: Twelve patients (6 males, median age 53 years) were identified (prevalence: 1.9%; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.8%-2.9%). All patients presented multiple cystic lesions (median number: 14 [range: 2-216]) with a bilateral distribution in 10/12, micronodules and nodules in 11/12 and fibrotic lesions in 4/12. Seven patients had normal lung function test, three had an obstructive syndrome, one had a restrictive syndrome and one had coexistence of both. During follow-up (median: 10 years [range 1-16 years]), an increase of the number of cysts was observed in four patients. At last evaluation, 3/12 patients experienced a decline of forced vital capacity >10% and 3/12 patients a decline of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >10%. A lower DLCO at diagnosis, and the presence of nodules or fibrotic lesions on CT were associated with an increase in the number of cysts., Conclusion: Cystic lung lesions are rare in patients with sarcoidosis and do not influence long term prognosis., (© 2024 The Author(s). Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background and Objective: Chronic interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurs rarely with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as compared with other connective tissue diseases. This multicentric retrospective study of patients with SLE-ILD from the OrphaLung and French SLE networks during 2005-2020 aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with SLE-ILD and analyse factors associated with prognosis., Methods: We analysed data for 89 patients with SLE-ILD (82 women, 92.1%) (median age at SLE diagnosis: 35 years [interquartile range 27-47]). All patients met the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for the diagnosis of SLE., Results: Forty two (47.2%) patients were positive for anti-ribonuclear protein antibodies and 45 (50.6%) for anti SSA/Ro antibodies. A total of 58 (65.2%) patients had another connective tissue disease: Sjögren's syndrome (n = 33, 37.1%), systemic sclerosis (n = 14, 15.7%), inflammatory myopathy (n = 6, 6.7%), or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 6, 6.7%). ILD was diagnosed along with SLE in 25 (28.1%) patients and at a median of 6 (0-14) years after the SLE diagnosis. The most frequent CT pattern was suggestive of non-specific interstitial pneumonia (n = 41, 46.0%) with or without superimposed organizing pneumonia. After a median follow-up of 86.5 [39.5-161.2] months, 18 (20.2%) patients had died and 6 (6.7%) underwent lung transplantation. The median 5-year and 10-year transplantation-free survival were 96% (92-100) and 87% (78-97). In total, 44 (49.4%) patients showed ILD progression. Cutaneous manifestations and Raynaud's phenomenon were associated with better survival. Only forced vital capacity was significantly associated with survival and ILD progression., Conclusion: ILD is a rare manifestation of SLE with good overall prognosis but with possible risk of ILD progression. Patients with SLE-ILD frequently have another connective tissue disease., (© 2024 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

In patients with pulmonary emphysema and mild to moderate airflow limitation, one does not expect the features marked exertional dyspnea and hypoxemia as well as a profound decrease in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Here we describe this phenotype and its prognosis. From our database, we retrospectively selected cases associating emphysema, exertional breathlessness, O 2 requirement at least upon exercise, forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV 1 ) ≥ 50% predicted, and DLCO ≤ 50% predicted, without associated combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema, right-to-left shunt, or severe pulmonary hypertension. Over a 12-year period, we identified 16 patients with emphysema and the above presentation. At the initial evaluation, the median age was 62 years (interquartile range 53.8-68.9). The median FEV 1 and DLCO% predicted and mean pulmonary artery pressure were 86 (65-95)%, 38 (31-41)%, and 20 (17-25) mm Hg, respectively. On room air, the median arterial partial pressure of oxygen and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood were 63.5 (55.8-69) mm Hg and 34.5 (31-36) mm Hg with increased median alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (46 [39-51] mm Hg). After the initial evaluation, the respiratory condition worsened in 13 of 14 (92.8%) patients with one or more re-evaluations (median follow-up 2.6 [0.9-5.8] years). In 12, lung transplantation was considered. Four patients died after 5.8, 5.7, 7.1, and 0.8 years of follow-up, respectively. We describe an underrecognized phenotype of pulmonary emphysema featuring a particular profile characterized by marked exertional dyspnea, impaired pulmonary gas exchange with low DLCO and marked oxygen desaturation at least on exercise but with mild or moderate airway obstruction., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objective: Recently, a genome-wide association study identified an association between RA-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) and RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 in the Japanese population, especially for patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern. We aimed to replicate this association in a European population and test for interaction with MUC5B rs35705950., Methods: In this genetic case-control association study, patients with RA and ILD and controls with RA and no ILD were included from France, the USA and the Netherlands. Only cases and controls from European genetic ancestries determined by principal components analysis were included in the analyses. RA was defined by the 1987 ACR or 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and ILD by chest high-resolution CT scan, except in the control dataset from the Netherlands, where the absence of ILD was determined by chart review. Patients were genotyped for RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950. Associations were tested using logistic regression adjusted for sex, age at RA onset, age at ILD onset or at certified absence of ILD, tobacco smoking status and country of origin., Results: Among the 883 patients included, 322 were RA-ILD cases (36.5%). MUC5B rs35705950 was strongly associated with RA-ILD in all datasets {combined adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% CI 2.1, 3.9], P  = 1.1 × 10 -11 . No association between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and RA-ILD was observed [combined OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.8, 1.6), P  = 0.31. No interaction was found between RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 and MUC5B rs35705950 ( P  = 0.70)., Conclusion: Our findings did not support a contribution of RPA3-UMAD1 rs12702634 to the overall RA-ILD susceptibility in the European population., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Background: Computational advances in artificial intelligence have led to the recent emergence of U-Net convolutional neural networks (CNNs) applied to medical imaging. Our objectives were to assess the progression of fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) using routine CT scans processed by a U-Net CNN developed by our research team, and to identify a progression threshold indicative of poor prognosis., Methods: CT scans and clinical history of 32 patients with idiopathic fibrotic ILDs were retrospectively reviewed. Successive CT scans were processed by the U-Net CNN and ILD quantification was obtained. Correlation between ILD and FVC changes was assessed. ROC curve was used to define a threshold of ILD progression rate (PR) to predict poor prognostic (mortality or lung transplantation). The PR threshold was used to compare the cohort survival with Kaplan Mayer curves and log-rank test., Results: The follow-up was 3.8 ± 1.5 years encompassing 105 CT scans, with 3.3 ± 1.1 CT scans per patient. A significant correlation between ILD and FVC changes was obtained (p = 0.004, ρ = -0.30 [95% CI: -0.16 to -0.45]). Sixteen patients (50%) experienced unfavorable outcome including 13 deaths and 3 lung transplantations. ROC curve analysis showed an aera under curve of 0.83 (p < 0.001), with an optimal cut-off PR value of 4%/year. Patients exhibiting a PR ≥ 4%/year during the first two years had a poorer prognosis (p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Applying a U-Net CNN to routine CT scan allowed identifying patients with a rapid progression and unfavorable outcome., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest XG, SR, CF, MB, DIBI, JFB, DV, JCj, JMN, PYB have no conflicts of interest. MPD received fees (presentations or participation in expert groups) from Boehringer-Ingelheim. HN received fees from Roche/Genentech, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Galapagos., (Copyright © 2023 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Intro: An increased prevalence of serum anti-MCV antibody is observed in the serum of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) but the clinical relevance of these antibodies is unknown., Methods: Patients from our center with a diagnosis of IPF according to the 2018 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines and at least one anti-MCV assay available were selected. All patients were part of the prospective cohort European IPF registry and selected between 03/2010 and 03/2018. We constituted two groups of patients according to the anti-MCV status at baseline to compare their characteristics at baseline and the evolution of lung function, survival and/or transplantation status., Results: Anti-MCV data were available for 101 patients, of whom 86 had complete clinical data available. Twenty-nine (34 %) patients had a positive anti-MCV assay (MCV+), at a low level in most patients (29 UI/mL [IQR 25-40]), and 57 (66 %) patients a negative assay (MCV-). MCV+ patients were 20 men and 9 women, with a median age of 73 years [IQR 67-78]. MCV- patients were 49 men and 8 women with a median age of 72 years [IQR 64-77]. Sixty-two (75 %) patients were ex-smokers and 5 (6 %) were active smokers. Median cumulative tobacco smoke exposure was 22.5 (15.0-38.6) and was similar in both groups. Lung function test results and HRCT pattern distribution was similar in both groups at baseline. The median duration of follow-up was 3.5 years [IQR 2.1-5.0]. Lung function decline was similar in both groups. During the study period, 31 (36 %) patients died or have been transplanted with no difference in transplant-free survival status between the two groups., Conclusion: Low level anti-MCV autoimmunity was prevalent in IPF patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest BC declares Grants or contracts from any entity for Boerhinger Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Translate Bio; Consulting fees for Apellis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Translate Bio, Sanofi, Novartis; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events for Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Sanofi; Support for attending meetings and/or travel for Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis; Leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for President of the Fondation du Souffle (a French charity). RB declares Grants or contracts from any entity for Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events for Roche, Boehtinger Ingelheim, Sanofi. A.G., S.O., P.D., P.L.G., P.N.R., C.T.N., C.L., M.P.D., C.T. : None, (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Several rare surfactant-related gene (SRG) variants associated with interstitial lung disease are suspected to be associated with lung cancer, but data are missing. We aimed to study the epidemiology and phenotype of lung cancer in an international cohort of SRG variant carriers., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all adults with SRG variants in the OrphaLung network and compared lung cancer risk with telomere-related gene (TRG) variant carriers., Results: We identified 99 SRG adult variant carriers ( SFTPA1 (n=18), SFTPA2 (n=31), SFTPC (n=24), ABCA3 (n=14) and NKX2-1 (n=12)), including 20 (20.2%) with lung cancer ( SFTPA1 (n=7), SFTPA2 (n=8), SFTPC (n=3), NKX2-1 (n=2) and ABCA3 (n=0)). Among SRG variant carriers, the odds of lung cancer was associated with age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08), smoking (OR 20.7, 95% CI 6.60-76.2) and SFTPA1 / SFTPA2 variants (OR 3.97, 95% CI 1.39-13.2). Adenocarcinoma was the only histological type reported, with programmed death ligand-1 expression ≥1% in tumour cells in three samples. Cancer staging was localised (I/II) in eight (40%) individuals, locally advanced (III) in two (10%) and metastatic (IV) in 10 (50%). We found no somatic variant eligible for targeted therapy. Seven cancers were surgically removed, 10 received systemic therapy, and three received the best supportive care according to their stage and performance status. The median overall survival was 24 months, with stage I/II cancers showing better survival. We identified 233 TRG variant carriers. The comparative risk (subdistribution hazard ratio) for lung cancer in SRG patients versus TRG patients was 18.1 (95% CI 7.1-44.7)., Conclusions: The high risk of lung cancer among SRG variant carriers suggests specific screening and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The benefit of regular computed tomography scan follow-up should be evaluated., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P. Bonniaud reports grants from AstraZeneca, lecture honoraria from Sanofi and AstraZeneca, travel support from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, Boehringer and Stallergenes, and advisory board membership with AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, GSK and Boehringer. J. Cadranel had a patent planned, received consulting fees and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daichi, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Roche and Takeda. A. Cazes reports lecture honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. B. Crestani reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from Apellis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from Apellis, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Sanofi, support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Apellis, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, and had a leadership role as President of the Board of Trustees of the Fondation du Souffle. R. Epaud reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, lecture honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca and Menarini, travel support from GSK and AstraZeneca, and advisory board membership with AstraZeneca and Novartis. M-P. Debray reports lecture honoraria and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. E. Manali reports lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, CLS Behring and Hoffman-La Roche, support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, CLS Behring, Hoffman-La Roche and Elpen, and had a leadership role as a Chair in the ERS Task Force for transition of chILD to adult care. S. Papiris reports lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffmann-La Roche, and travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Elpen. N. Nathan reports grants from Legs poix de la Chancellerie des Universités 2022 (number 2022000594). C. Andréjak participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for the EVER-ILD2 study (rituximab in diffuse interstitial pneumonia) and received funding via a grant from the French Research Ministry. S. Jouneau reports grants from AIRB, Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, lecture honoraria from AIRB, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Genzyme, GSK, LVL, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and AIRB, and advisory board participation for Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Sanofi. G. Beltramo reports lecture honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, and support for attending meetings or travel from Sanofi Aventis France and Boehringer Ingelheim France. S. Hirschi reports research grants from Agence de la Biomedécine, CSL Behring and Adiral medical assistance, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, travel support from CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim and ISIS Medical, and received medical equipment from ISIS Medical. C. Picard reports lecture honoraria and consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. G. Prévot reports honoraria for presentations and educational event from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Jansen and MSD. G. Zalcman reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from BMS, AstraZeneca and Sanofi, support for attending meetings or travel from AstraZeneca and BMS, and participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca and BMS. V. Cottin reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, CSL Behring, Ferrer/United Therapeutics, GSK, Pliant, Pure Tech, RedX, Roche, Sanofi and Shionogi, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer/United Therapeutics and Roche, support for attending meetings or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Galapagos, Galecto and GSK, and had a leadership role in an adjudication committee for Fibrogen. R. Borie reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ferrer and Sanofi, lecture honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Chiesi, and advisory board participation for Savara. The remaining authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Objective: Although airway disease associated with Sjögren's disease (Sjo-AD) is common, it is poorly studied compared with interstitial lung disease (ILD). In this study, we aimed to assess factors associated with Sjo-AD, the characteristics and prognosis of this manifestation., Methods: We performed a retrospective multicentric study involving nine centres. We included Sjo-AD patients confirmed by at least one clinician and one CT scan report. Clinical and biological data, pulmonary function test (PFT), and CT scans were collected. A single radiologist specialist in thoracic diseases reviewed CT scans. Sjo-AD patients were compared with Sjo controls without pulmonary involvement, randomly selected after matching for age and disease duration., Results: We included 31 Sjo-AD and 62 Sjo controls without pulmonary history. Sjo-AD had a higher disease activity (ESSDAI) compared with controls, even when excluding the pulmonary domain of the score (7 vs 3.8, p<0.05), mainly due to the biological activity. Sjo-AD was multilobar (72%) and associated with signs of both bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis (60%). Obstructive lung disease occurred in 32% at the time of Sjo-AD diagnosis. Overall, PFT was stable after 8.7±7 years follow-up but repeated CT scans showed extended lesions in 41% of cases within 6±3.2 years. No patient developed Sjo-ILD. Sjo-AD progression was independent of the global disease activity., Conclusions: Sjo-AD preferentially affects Sjo patients with higher biological activity. It is often characterised as a diffuse disease, affecting both proximal and distal airways, with a slow evolution over time and no progression to Sjo-ILD., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GN received honorarium from Biogen, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Amgen. XM received honorarium from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer. M-PD received honorarium from Boehringer-Ingelheim and GSK. P-AJ received honorarium from Galapagos. ED received honorarium from Abbvie, BMS, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi, UCB, Celgène, Amgen and Galapagos., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) seems promising in diagnosing pneumonia on chest x-rays (CXR), but deep learning (DL) algorithms have primarily been compared with radiologists, whose diagnosis can be not completely accurate. Therefore, we evaluated the accuracy of DL in diagnosing pneumonia on CXR using a more robust reference diagnosis., Methods: We trained a DL convolutional neural network model to diagnose pneumonia and evaluated its accuracy in two prospective pneumonia cohorts including 430 patients, for whom the reference diagnosis was determined a posteriori by a multidisciplinary expert panel using multimodal data. The performance of the DL model was compared with that of senior radiologists and emergency physicians reviewing CXRs and that of radiologists reviewing computed tomography (CT) performed concomitantly., Results: Radiologists and DL showed a similar accuracy on CXR for both cohorts (p ≥ 0.269): cohort 1, radiologist 1 75.5% (95% confidence interval 69.1-80.9), radiologist 2 71.0% (64.4-76.8), DL 71.0% (64.4-76.8); cohort 2, radiologist 70.9% (64.7-76.4), DL 72.6% (66.5-78.0). The accuracy of radiologists and DL was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.022) than that of emergency physicians (cohort 1 64.0% [57.1-70.3], cohort 2 63.0% [55.6-69.0]). Accuracy was significantly higher for CT (cohort 1 79.0% [72.8-84.1], cohort 2 89.6% [84.9-92.9]) than for CXR readers including radiologists, clinicians, and DL (all p-values < 0.001)., Conclusions: When compared with a robust reference diagnosis, the performance of AI models to identify pneumonia on CXRs was inferior than previously reported but similar to that of radiologists and better than that of emergency physicians., Relevance Statement: The clinical relevance of AI models for pneumonia diagnosis may have been overestimated. AI models should be benchmarked against robust reference multimodal diagnosis to avoid overestimating its performance., Trial Registration: NCT02467192 , and NCT01574066 ., Key Point: • We evaluated an openly-access convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose pneumonia on CXRs. • CNN was validated against a strong multimodal reference diagnosis. • In our study, the CNN performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.74) was lower than that previously reported when validated against radiologists' diagnosis (0.99 in a recent meta-analysis). • The CNN performance was significantly higher than emergency physicians' (p ≤ 0.022) and comparable to that of board-certified radiologists (p ≥ 0.269)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Genetic analysis pre-lung transplantation diagnosed a case of hereditary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) complicated by fibrosis in adulthood. The need for genetic testing in GM-CSF autoantibody negative and unclassifiable PAP is highlighted. https://bit.ly/3QcsYwM., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: S.A. Papiris reports grants or contracts as the Savara Impala 2 Trial Primary Investigator, outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, DEMO, Hoffman la Roche and Elpen, outside the submitted work; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports receiving consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Ferrer, outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and Ferrer, outside the submitted work; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Savara, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Nathan reports grants or contracts from the Orphan Disease Center, Genetic Basis of Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia of Infancy (principal investigator (PI)), French Research and Innovation Grant 2023 (CORTICO-NEHI; PI) and Chancellerie des universités (PI), outside the submitted work; participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for Research and Innovation AP-HP, France (member), outside the submitted work; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid for a Clinical Research Collaboration on chILDEU of the European Respiratory Society (2022–present). Conflict of interest: M. Griese reports Boehringer Ingelheim support for an adjudication board, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E.D. Manali reports grants or contracts as a Savara Impala 2 Trial Subinvestigator, outside the submitted work; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Hoffman la Roche and Elpen, outside the submitted work; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objectives: The objective was to define a safe strategy to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) in COVID-19 outpatients, without performing CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA)., Methods: COVID-19 outpatients from 15 university hospitals who underwent a CTPA were retrospectively evaluated. D-Dimers, variables of the revised Geneva and Wells scores, as well as laboratory findings and clinical characteristics related to COVID-19 pneumonia, were collected. CTPA reports were reviewed for the presence of PE and the extent of COVID-19 disease. PE rule-out strategies were based solely on D-Dimer tests using different thresholds, the revised Geneva and Wells scores, and a COVID-19 PE prediction model built on our dataset were compared. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), failure rate, and efficiency were calculated., Results: In total, 1369 patients were included of whom 124 were PE positive (9.1%). Failure rate and efficiency of D-Dimer > 500 µg/l were 0.9% (95%CI, 0.2-4.8%) and 10.1% (8.5-11.9%), respectively, increasing to 1.0% (0.2-5.3%) and 16.4% (14.4-18.7%), respectively, for an age-adjusted D-Dimer level. D-dimer > 1000 µg/l led to an unacceptable failure rate to 8.1% (4.4-14.5%). The best performances of the revised Geneva and Wells scores were obtained using the age-adjusted D-Dimer level. They had the same failure rate of 1.0% (0.2-5.3%) for efficiency of 16.8% (14.7-19.1%), and 16.9% (14.8-19.2%) respectively. The developed COVID-19 PE prediction model had an AUC of 0.609 (0.594-0.623) with an efficiency of 20.5% (18.4-22.8%) when its failure was set to 0.8%., Conclusions: The strategy to safely exclude PE in COVID-19 outpatients should not differ from that used in non-COVID-19 patients. The added value of the COVID-19 PE prediction model is minor., Key Points: • D-dimer level remains the most important predictor of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients. • The AUCs of the revised Geneva and Wells scores using an age-adjusted D-dimer threshold were 0.587 (95%CI, 0.572 to 0.603) and 0.588 (95%CI, 0.572 to 0.603). • The AUC of COVID-19-specific strategy to rule out pulmonary embolism ranged from 0.513 (95%CI: 0.503 to 0.522) to 0.609 (95%CI: 0.594 to 0.623)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Background: Standard of care for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern proposes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as one of the first-step therapies while rituximab is used as rescue therapy., Methods: In a randomised, double-blind, two-parallel group, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02990286), patients with connective tissue disease-associated ILD or idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (with or without autoimmune features) and a NSIP pattern (defined on NSIP pathological pattern or on integration of clinicobiological data and a NSIP-like high-resolution computed tomography pattern) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rituximab (1000 mg) or placebo on day 1 and day 15 in addition to MMF (2 g daily) for 6 months. The primary end-point was the change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to 6 months analysed by a linear mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) up to 6 months and safety., Findings: Between January 2017 and January 2019, 122 randomised patients received at least one dose of rituximab (n=63) or placebo (n=59). The least-squares mean change from baseline to 6 months in FVC (% predicted) was +1.60 (se 1.13) in the rituximab+MMF group and -2.01 (se 1.17) in the placebo+MMF group (between-group difference 3.60, 95% CI 0.41-6.80; p=0.0273). PFS was better in the rituximab+MMF group (crude hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96; p=0.03). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 (41%) patients of the rituximab+MMF group and in 23 (39%) of the placebo+MMF group. Nine infections were reported in the rituximab+MMF group (five bacterial infections, three viral infections, one other) and four bacterial infections in the placebo+MMF group., Interpretation: Combination of rituximab and MMF was superior to MMF alone in patients with ILD and a NSIP pattern. The use of this combination must take into consideration the risk of viral infection., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Caille reports grants from French National Research Agency, outside the submitted work. P. Bonniaud reports grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial (reimbursement for national and international conferences) support from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi and GSK, and non-financial support (reimbursement for national and international conferences) from Chiesi and Stallergene. R. Borie has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from Boehringer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Savara and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. J. Cadranel reports honoraria for educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. B. Crestani has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Apellis, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Chiesi, outside the submitted work; and has also received equipment/drugs or other services from Translate Bio. M-P. Debray has received or reimbursement for national and international conferences and educational events over the past 3 years from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. D. Israel-Biet reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, honoraria for educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, payments from Galapagos as a member of an adjudication committee, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. S. Jouneau has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AIRB, Bellorophon Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer, Chiesi, Fibrogen, Galecto Biotech, Gilead, LVL, Novartis, Olam Pharm, Pfizer, Pliant Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Savara. J-M. Naccache has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. L. Plantier has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Sanofi, Humanair and Arair, outside the submitted work. V. Valentin has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, and boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. L. Wémeau-Stervinou reports personal fees and non-financial (reimbursement for national and international conferences) support from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and BMS, outside the submitted work. V. Cottin reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, MSD, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX, PureTech and Promedior, outside the submitted work. S. Marchand-Adam has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, and boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

This is the first case of a 37-year-old female patient carrier of a heterozygous NKX2.1 mutation associated with RA-ILD with a histological pattern of LIP. This case illustrates the wide panel of ILD subtypes associated with NKX2.1 mutations. https://bit.ly/3F49OTS., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P. Le Guen has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie has received grants and personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, and personal fees from Savara, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Legendre has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Dupin has served on an advisory board for, and received a congress invitation and a speaker fee from AstraZeneca; received speaker fees and congress invitations from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi and Novartis; served as a study investigator for, and received a speaker fee and a congress invitation from GSK; served as an advisory board member and received a congress invitation from Sanofi; and received a congress invitation from Roche, all outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Dunogeant has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Ottaviani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, and nonfinancial support from Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A. Cazes has received personal fees from Roche, Boehringer and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Dieudé has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani has received speaker honoraria and support for a congress from AstraZeneca; received grants, speaker honoraria and support for congresses from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche; received speaker honoraria, honoraria to consultancy and support for a congress from Sanofi; served on an advisory board for Genzyme; and served on an advisory board and received support for a congress from BMS, all outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: The vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is a newly identified autoinflammatory disorder related to somatic UBA1 mutations. Up to 72% of patients may show lung involvement., Research Question: What are the pleuropulmonary manifestations in VEXAS syndrome?, Study Design and Methods: One hundred fourteen patients were included in the French cohort of VEXAS syndrome between November 2020 and May 2021. Each patient included in the study who had an available chest CT scan was discussed in an adjudication multidisciplinary team and classified as showing potentially pleuropulmonary-specific involvement of VEXAS syndrome or others., Results: Fifty-one patients had a CT scan available for review and 45 patients (39%) showed pleuropulmonary abnormalities on chest CT scan that were considered related to VEXAS syndrome after adjudication. Most patients were men (95%) with a median age 67.0 years at the onset of symptoms. Among these 45 patients, 44% reported dyspnea and 40% reported cough. All 45 patients showed lung opacities on chest CT scan (including ground-glass opacities [87%], consolidations [49%], reticulation [38%], and septal lines [51%]) and 53% of patients showed pleural effusion. Most patients showed improvement with prednisone, but usually required > 20 mg/d. The main clinical and biological features as well the median survival did not differ between the 45 patients with pleuropulmonary involvement and the rest of the cohort, suggesting that the prevalence of pleuropulmonary involvement might have been underdiagnosed in the rest of the cohort., Interpretation: Pulmonary manifestations are frequent in VEXAS syndrome, but rarely are at the forefront. The initial outcome is favorable with prednisone and does not seem to lead to pulmonary fibrosis., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surgical lung biopsy is essential in the diagnostic algorithm of interstitial lung disease (ILD) of unknown cause. Safety concerns have been recently reiterated. This study prospectively assessed the yield of diagnosis and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lung biopsy (VATS-LB) for ILD diagnosis., Methods: This prospective study, conducted in 6 ILD-referral Paris hospitals, included 103 patients with ILD. VATS-LB was proposed after initial multidisciplinary discussion. A final diagnosis was made after the procedure, during a second multidisciplinary discussion. The main outcome was to determine the final diagnoses and their proportion after VATS-LB. Other outcomes were the percentage of change in diagnosis and treatment propositions after VATS-LB and adverse events during 3 months after the operation, postoperative pulmonary function, quality of life, and pain., Results: A definite diagnosis was reached in 87 patients (84.4%), and 16 remained unclassifiable (15.6%). After VATS-LB, the hypothesized diagnosis changed in 65 patients (63.1%) and treatment changed in 41 patients (39.8%). One patient died of acute exacerbation. In-hospital complications were predicted by a shorter preoperative 6-minute walking test distance and by forced vital capacity lower than 77%. Postoperative quality of life was not modified at 3 months, whereas forced vital capacity decreased slightly. Postoperative neuropathic pain was revealed in 5% of patients at 1 month and in 2% at 3 months., Conclusions: VATS-LB dramatically changed preoperative hypothetical diagnoses and treatment in ILD of unknown cause, with good patient survival in ILD referral centers., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients at high risk of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) would benefit from being identified before the onset of respiratory symptoms; this can be done by screening patients with the use of chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Our objective was to develop and validate a risk score for patients who have subclinical RA-ILD., Methods: Our study included a discovery population and a replication population from 2 prospective RA cohorts (ESPOIR and TRANSLATE2, respectively) without pulmonary symptoms who had received chest HRCT scans. All patients were genotyped for MUC5B rs35705950. After multiple logistic regression, a risk score based on independent risk factors for subclinical RA-ILD was developed in the discovery population and tested for validation in the replication population., Results: The discovery population included 163 patients with RA, and the replication population included 89 patients with RA. The prevalence of subclinical RA-ILD was 19.0% and 16.9%, respectively. In the discovery population, independent risk factors for subclinical RA-ILD were presence of the MUC5B rs35705950 T allele (odds ratio [OR] 3.74 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.37, 10.39]), male sex (OR 3.93 [95% CI 1.40, 11.39]), older age at RA onset (for each year, OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.04, 1.16]), and increased mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (for each unit, OR 2.03 [95% CI 1.24, 3.42]). We developed and validated a derived risk score with receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.94) for the discovery population and 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.92) for the replication population. Excluding MUC5B rs35705950 from the model provided a lower goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.01)., Conclusion: We developed and validated a risk score that could help identify patients at high risk of subclinical RA-ILD. Our findings support an important contribution of MUC5B rs35705950 to subclinical RA-ILD risk., (© 2022 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: Diagnosis of interstitial lung disease is based on the analysis of clinical, biological, radiological, and pathological findings during a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD). When a definitive diagnosis is not possible, guidelines recommend obtaining lung samples through surgical lung biopsy (SLB). We sought to determine morbidity, mortality, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic impact of SLB in the management of patients with interstitial lung disease., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed morbidity, mortality, diagnostic yield, and therapeutic changes after SLB for interstitial lung disease performed electively from January 2015 to May 2019 in a reference center. Each case was reviewed during 2 MDDs, first without and then with the result of the SLB., Results: The study group included 73 patients (56% male, age 66 [interquartile range (IQR), 57-70] years, forced vital capacity 79% [IQR, 69%-91%], diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide 52% [IQR, 46%-63%]). Median postoperative hospital length of stay was 2 (IQR, 0-11) days. Thirteen (17%) patients experienced at least 1 complication, including pain at 1 month (n = 8) and residual pneumothorax (n = 6). No serious complication or postoperative death was noticed. After the first retrospective MDD, the working diagnosis was idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia in 20 (27%), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 18 (25%), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in 15 (21%), unclassifiable interstitial lung disease in 5 (7%), and other diagnosis in 15 (21%) patients. After SLB and second retrospective MDD, the final diagnosis was modified in 35 (48%) patients and led to therapeutic changes in 33 (45%) patients., Conclusions: SLB is associated with no serious complication or death and notably changes the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung disease., (Copyright © 2022 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Chest computed tomography (CT) was reported to improve the diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as compared to chest X-ray (CXR). The aim of this study is to describe the CT-patterns of CAP in a large population visiting the emergency department and to see if some of them are more frequently missed on CXR., Materials and Methods: This is an ancillary analysis of the prospective multicenter ESCAPED study including 319 patients. We selected the 163 definite or probable CAP based on adjudication committee classification; 147 available chest CT scans were reinterpreted by 3 chest radiologists to identify CAP patterns. These CT-patterns were correlated to epidemiological, biological and microbiological data, and compared between false negative and true positive CXR CAP., Results: Six patterns were identified: lobar pneumonia (51/147, 35%), including 35 with plurifocal involvement; lobular pneumonia (43/147, 29%); unilobar infra-segmental consolidation (24/147, 16%); bronchiolitis (16/147, 11%), including 4 unilobar bronchiolitis; atelectasis and bronchial abnormalities (8/147, 5.5%); interstitial pneumonia (5/147, 3.5%). Bacteria were isolated in 41% of patients with lobar pneumonia-pattern (mostly Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumonia) versus 19% in other patients (p = 0.01). Respiratory viruses were equally distributed within all patterns. CXR was falsely negative in 46/147 (31%) patients. Lobar pneumonia was significantly less missed on CXR than other patterns (p = 0.003), especially lobular pneumonia and unilobar infra-segmental consolidation, missed in 35% and 58% of cases, respectively., Conclusion: Lobar and lobular pneumonias are the most frequent CT-patterns. Lobar pneumonia is appropriately detected on CXR and mainly due to Streptococcus pneumoniae or Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Chest CT is very useful to identify CAP in other CT-patterns. Prior the COVID pandemic, CAP was rarely responsible for interstitial opacities on CT., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None, (Copyright © 2022 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) mutations have been associated with familial pulmonary fibrosis. This study aims to describe the phenotype of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and heterozygous PARN mutations., Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational, non-interventional study of patients with an ILD diagnosis and a pathogenic heterozygous PARN mutation followed up in a centre of the OrphaLung network., Results: We included 31 patients (29 from 16 kindreds and two sporadic patients). The median age at ILD diagnosis was 59 years (range 54 to 63). In total, 23 (74%) patients had a smoking history and/or fibrogenic exposure. The pulmonary phenotypes were heterogenous, but the most frequent diagnosis was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n = 12, 39%). Haematological abnormalities were identified in three patients and liver disease in two. In total, 21 patients received a specific treatment for ILD: steroids (n = 13), antifibrotic agents (n = 11), immunosuppressants (n = 5) and N-acetyl cysteine (n = 2). The median forced vital capacity decline for the whole sample was 256 ml/year (range -363 to -148). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range 18 to 66), 10 patients had died and six had undergone lung transplantation. The median transplantation-free survival was 54 months (95% CI 29 to ∞). Extra-pulmonary features were less frequent with PARN mutation than telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) or telomerase RNA component (TERC) mutation., Conclusion: IPF is common among individuals with PARN mutation, but other ILD subtypes may be observed., (© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Background: Computed tomography (CT) screening has improved lung cancer survival, yet increasingly detects small lung lesions. Thus, the number of transthoracic lung biopsies (TTLB) for small nodules is expected to rise significantly. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided TTLB for nodules ≤20 mm versus nodules >20 mm., Study Design and Methods: Data for CT-guided TTLBs from 474 consecutive patients were prospectively collected over a 3-year period (198 lesions ≤20 mm and 276 lesions >20 mm) in a teaching hospital and analysed in terms of diagnostic performance and complications., Results: There were more conclusive biopsies in the >20 mm lesion group (n=236, 85.5%) than in ≤20 mm lesion group (n=140, 70.7%; p<0.001). The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for diagnosing malignant lesions after first TTLB were 88.4%, 84%, 100% and 70.1%, respectively, for ≤20 mm lesions, and 94.2%, 93%, 100% and 74.6%, respectively, for >20 mm lesions. Pneumothorax requiring drainage was significantly more common for ≤20 mm lesions, compared to TTLB of larger lesions (9.6% versus 4.3%; p=0.02). Prolonged hospital stay due to pneumothorax occurred in 27 (17.4%) TTLBs of ≤20 mm lesions and 15 (7%) TTLBs of >20 mm lesions (p=0.002). There were no deaths. The only variable significantly associated with diagnostic failure in the ≤20 mm lesion group was the radiologist's experience., Interpretation: TTLBs for lesions ≤20 mm were associated with slightly lower diagnostic performance, whereas the higher rate of major complications was still inferior to that extrapolated from United States insurance databases., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: E. Lissavalid, A. Khalil and G. Soussi report no conflicts of interest. M-P. Debray reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Boston Scientific, all outside the submitted work. A. Guyard reports personal fees from Diaceutics outside the submitted work. V. Bunel reports no conflicts of interest. R. Borie reports grants and personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi, all outside the submitted work. P. Mordant reports no conflicts of interest. A. Cazes reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer and Roche, all outside the submitted work. G. Zalcman reports personal fees from BMS, MSD and Boehringer; nonfinancial and other support from Roche and AstraZeneca; and other support from Abbvie, all outside the submitted work. V. Gounant reports personal fees from MSD, Chugai, Novartis and Boehringer; personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, BMS, Takeda and Pfizer; and grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche, all outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2022.)

Background: In patients receiving single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, worsening of fibrosis of the native lung is usually progressive over time, with no significant effects on gas exchange., Case Presentation: Here, we describe the cases of two Caucasian male recipients of single lung transplants for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 65 and 62 years of age, who exhibited acute worsening of lung fibrosis after an episode of serious viral infection (cytomegalovirus primo-infection in one case and COVID-19 in the other). In both cases, along with opacification of the native lung over several days, the patients presented acute respiratory failure that required the use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. Eventually, hypoxemic respiratory failure resolved, but with rapid progression of fibrosis of the native lung., Conclusion: We conclude that acute worsening of fibrosis on the native lung secondary to a severe viral infection should be added to the list of potential complications developing on the native lung after single lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The use of cyclophosphamide in patients with acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Our study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four cyclophosphamide pulses in addition to high-dose methylprednisolone in this population., Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial done in 35 departments across 31 hospitals in France, adult patients (≥18 years) with acute exacerbation of IPF and those with suspected acute exacerbation of IPF were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio using a web-based system to receive either intravenous pulses of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m 2 ) plus uromitexan as haemorrhagic cystitis prophylaxis (200 mg/m 2 ) at the time of cyclophosphamide administration and then again, 4 h later, or placebo at days 0, 15, 30, and 60. Random assignment was stratified according to the severity of IPF and was block-balanced with variable block sizes of four or six patients. Patients receiving mechanical ventilation, with active infection, with active cancer, or who were registered on the lung transplant waiting list were excluded. All patients received standardised high-dose glucocorticoids. The investigators, patients, and the sponsor were masked to the treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality, analysed by a χ 2 test adhering to an intention-to-treat principle. The trial is now complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02460588., Findings: Between Jan 22, 2016, and July 19, 2018, 183 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 120 patients were randomly assigned and 119 patients (62 [52%] with severe IPF) received at least one dose of cyclophosphamide (n=60) or placebo (n=59), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The 3-month all-cause mortality was 45% (27/60) in patients given cyclophosphamide compared with 31% (18/59) in the placebo group (difference 14·5% [95% CI -3·1 to 31·6]; p=0·10). Similar results were found after adjustment by IPF severity (odds ratio [OR] 1·89 [95% CI 0·89-4·04]). The risk of death at 3 months, independent of the treatment received, was higher with severe than non-severe IPF (OR 2·62 [1·12-6·12]) and was lower with the use of antifibrotic therapy (OR 0·33 [0·13-0·82]). Adverse events were similar between groups by 6 months (25 [42%] in the cyclophosphamide group vs 30 [51%] in the placebo group) and their proportion, including infections, did not differ. Overall infection was the main adverse event and occurred in 20 (33%) of 60 patients in the cyclophosphamide group versus 21 (36%) of 59 patients in the placebo group., Interpretation: In patients with acute exacerbation of IPF, adding intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses to glucocorticoids increased 3-month mortality. These findings provide evidence against the use of intravenous cyclophosphamide in such patients., Funding: Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique of the French Ministry of Health (PHRC 2014-502), Roche Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests J-MN reports grants from the French Ministry of Health and Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim. SJ reports personal fees from Actelion, Association pour les Insuffisants Respiratoires de Bretagne, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galacto Biotech, Genzyme, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, LVL Medical, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Savara-Serendex; and received funding for clinical trials from Bellorophon Therapeutics, Biogen, Olam Pharm, and Pliant Therapeutics. RB reports grants from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche; and personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, Roche, Sanofi, and SAvara. AB has received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron; has provided consultancy for Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, MedinCell, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Regeneron; and has acted as an investigator or co-investigator for trials sponsored by Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Vertex. PB reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer, Chiesi, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Stallergene, and Teva. SM-A reports personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim and Roche. FG reports grants from Resmed; personal fees from Actelion, Cidelec, Novartis, Nyxoah, Resmed, and Sefam; and non-financial support from Asten, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Nyxoah, and Sefam. SD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. AT reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Chiesi; and travel accomodation fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and Vitalaire. PYB reports grants from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche; and personal fees from Laboratoire Boehringer Ingelheim and Laboratoire Roche. MPD reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. GB reports non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim France, Novartis Pharma, and Roche. LW-S reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. CC reports grants from Santelys; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Roche. DV reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. BC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genzyme, Roche, and Sanofi; non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, and Sanofi; and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. VC reports personal fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Fibrogen, Galapagos, Galecto, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Promedior, Roche, Sanofi, and Shionogi; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; and non-financial support from Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Promedior, and Roche. TS reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. HN reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche/Genentech; personal fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galapagos, and Roche/Genentech; and was the investigator of a clinical trial for Galecto Biotech AB, Gilead, Novartis, and Sanofi, during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective : Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common feature of connective tissue disease (CTD). The diagnosis of CTD-ILD can be challenging and is important for therapeutic decisions. In this study, we aimed to determine whether a systematic rheumatological assessment could help pulmonologists in the diagnosis and care of ILD patients. Method : We conducted an observational single-centre study of patients with ILD. All patients underwent standardized pulmonary and rheumatological evaluations, including clinical evaluation (pulmonary symptoms and musculoskeletal signs), immunological screening, chest high-resolution computed tomography, pulmonary function tests, and ultrasonography (US) of joints and major salivary glands. Results : We included 100 consecutive ILD patients (47% women, mean ± sd age 67 ± 14 years); 15 patients already had CTD. The main extrapulmonary symptoms were joint pain (n = 52), joint swelling (n = 26), and sicca syndrome (n = 33). US of joints revealed synovitis, bone erosion, and tenosynovitis in 37, 17, and 13 patients, respectively. US of major salivary glands detected features associated with Sjögren's syndrome in 13 patients. After rheumatological evaluation, CTD-ILD was confidently diagnosed in 39 patients; diseases were mainly rheumatoid arthritis (n = 20), primary Sjögren's syndrome (n = 17), and inflammatory myopathies (n = 7). The diagnosis of CTD-ILD was associated with the presence of musculoskeletal symptoms and immunological and US abnormalities. The CTD diagnosis led to a therapeutic change in 21 patients. Conclusion : Our findings suggest that musculoskeletal symptoms are frequent in ILD patients, which supports multidisciplinary management, involving the rheumatologist, for evaluating patients with ILD.

Germline surfactant-associated genes mutations are associated with ILD and increased risk of lung cancer https://bit.ly/3CkkXgD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, and participation on a data safety monitoring/advisory board for Savara. Conflict of interest: B. Funalot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Epaud has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Delestrain has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Cazes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Gounant reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, BMS, Takeda and Pfizer, and participation on a data safety monitoring/advisory board for MSD, Chugai, Novartis, Boehringer and Takeda. Conflict of interest: J. Frija reports personal fees from Withings and Hinlab, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, Oxyvie, ADEP Assistance and Vitalaire, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.P. Debray reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: G. Zalcman reports a research grant for a PhD thesis in his laboratory from Fondation Roche; consulting fees from BMS, AstraZeneca and Da Volterra; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Abbvie, AstraZeneca and Pfizer. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2021.)

Increased blood fibrocytes are associated with a poor prognosis in fibrotic lung diseases. We aimed to determine whether the percentage of circulating fibrocytes could be predictive of severity and prognosis during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. Blood fibrocytes were quantified by flow cytometry as CD45 + /CD15 - /CD34 + /collagen-1 + cells in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. In a subgroup of patients admitted in an intensive care unit (ICU), fibrocytes were quantified in blood and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Serum amyloid P (SAP), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), CXCL12, CCL2, and FGF2 concentrations were measured. We included 57 patients in the hospitalized group (median age = 59 yr [23-87]) and 16 individuals as healthy controls. The median percentage of circulating fibrocytes was higher in the patients compared with the controls (3.6% [0.2-9.2] vs. 2.1% [0.9-5.1], P = 0.04). Blood fibrocyte count was lower in the six patients who died compared with the survivors (1.6% [0.2-4.4] vs. 3.7% [0.6-9.2], P = 0.02). Initial fibrocyte count was higher in patients showing a complete lung computed tomography (CT) resolution at 3 mo. Circulating fibrocyte count was decreased in the ICU group (0.8% [0.1-2.0]), whereas BAL fibrocyte count was 6.7% (2.2-15.4). Serum SAP and TGF-β1 concentrations were increased in hospitalized patients. SAP was also increased in ICU patients. CXCL12 and CCL2 were increased in ICU patients and negatively correlated with circulating fibrocyte count. We conclude that circulating fibrocytes were increased in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, and a lower fibrocyte count was associated with an increased risk of death and a slower resolution of lung CT opacities.

Objectives: The wide-volume mode, available on wide-area detector row CTs, has the advantage of reducing exposure time and radiation dose. It is infrequently used for lung diseases. The purpose of this study is to compare image quality and radiation dose of wide-volume chest CT to those of standard helical CT in the setting of interstitial lung diseases., Methods: Retrospective monocentric study including 50 consecutive patients referred for follow-up or screening of interstitial lung diseases, requiring prone scan, acquired with the wide-volume mode, in addition to the routine supine scan, acquired with the helical mode. The optimal collimation in wide-volume mode (320 × 0.5mm or 240 × 0.5mm) was chosen according to the length of the thorax. Wide-volume acquisitions were compared to helical acquisitions for radiation dose (CTDI vol , DLP) and image quality, including analysis of normal structures, lesions, overall image quality, and artifacts (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)., Results: Median CTDI vol and DLP with wide volumes (3.1 mGy and 94.6 mGy·cm) were significantly reduced (p < 0.0001) as compared to helical mode (3.7mGy and 122.1 mGy·cm), leading to a median 21% and 32% relative reduction of CTDI vol and DLP, respectively. Image noise and quality were not significantly different between the two modes. Misalignment artifact at the junction of two volumes was occasionally seen in the wide-volume scans and, when present, did not impair the diagnostic quality in the majority of cases., Conclusions: Wide-volume mode allows 32% radiation dose reduction compared to the standard helical mode and could be used routinely for diagnosis and follow-up of interstitial lung diseases., Key Points: • Retrospective monocentric study showed that wide-volume scan mode reduces radiation dose by 32% in comparison to helical mode for chest CT in the setting of interstitial lung diseases. • Mild misalignment may be observed at the junction between volumes with the wide-volume mode, without decrease of image quality in the majority of cases and without impairing diagnostic quality. • Wide-volume mode could be used routinely for the diagnosis and follow-up of interstitial lung diseases., (© 2021. European Society of Radiology.)

Background: The major risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), MUC5B rs35705950, was found to be associated with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Whilst the MUC5B rs35705950 T risk allele has been associated with better survival in IPF, its impact on RA-ILD prognosis remains to be determined. Our objective was to explore the influence of MUC5B rs35705950 on survival and progression in RA-ILD., Methods: Through an international retrospective observational study, patients with RA-ILD were genotyped for the MUC5B rs35705950 variant and consecutive pulmonary function tests (PFTs) findings were collected. Longitudinal data up to a 10-year follow-up were considered and analyzed using mixed regression models. Proportional hazards and joint proportional hazards models were used to analyze the association of baseline and longitudinal variables with lung transplant-free survival. Significant progression of RA-ILD was defined as at least an absolute or relative 10% decline of forced vital capacity at 2 years from baseline., Results: Out of 321 registered patients, 261 were included in the study: 139 women (53.3%), median age at RA-ILD diagnosis 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57 to 71), 151 ever smokers (59.2%). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (IQR 1.3 to 6.6). Mortality rate was 32% (95%CI 19 to 42) at 10 years. The MUC5B rs35705950 variant did not impact lung transplant-free survival (HR for the T risk allele carriers=1.26; 95%CI 0.61 to 2.62; P=0.53). Decline in pulmonary function at 2 years was not influenced by MUC5B rs35705950 (OR=0.95; 95%CI 0.44 to 2.05; P=0.89), irrespective of the HRCT pattern., Conclusion: In this study, the MUC5B rs35705950 promoter variant did not influence transplant- free survival or decline in pulmonary function in patients with RA-ILD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest PAJ reports personal fees from BMS, outside the submitted work. JSL reports grants from NIH, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Celgene outside the submitted work. RB reports grants and personal fees from Roche, grants and personal fees from Boerhinger Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. LWS reports personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees from Bristol-Myers-Squibb, outside the submitted work. RMF reports grants and personal fees from Roche Chugai, grants and personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. YU reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Bohringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. DV reports personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Bohringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Astra Zenecca, outside the submitted work. PJW reports grants from Genentech, grants from Medimmune, outside the submitted work. DAS reports grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from NIH-NHLBI, grants from DOD Focused Program Grant, during the conduct of the study; other from Eleven P15, Inc., personal fees from NuMedii, Inc., outside the submitted work. In addition, DAS has a patent Compositions and Methods of Treating or Preventing Fibrotic Diseases pending, a patent Biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of fibrotic lung disease pending, and a patent Methods and Compositions for Risk Prediction, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pulmonary Disorders issued. BC reports grants from Apellis, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants from MedImmune, grants and personal fees from Roche, personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. PD reports grants from PFIZER, grants and personal fees from ROCHE, grants and personal fees from CHUGAI, grants and personal fees from BMS, personal fees from ABBVIE, personal fees from MSD, outside the submitted work. JS, CvM, RG, FLS, JRS, MIGP, MM, IBR, RFV, EAO, EM, SAP, TK, DB, KMA, PS, AT, JJvdV, AJ, JG, CK, HN, NSK, MCB, CR, TS, TD, MPD, CB and RP have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background There are conflicting data regarding the diagnostic performance of chest CT for COVID-19 pneumonia. Disease extent at CT has been reported to influence prognosis. Purpose To create a large publicly available data set and assess the diagnostic and prognostic value of CT in COVID-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods This multicenter, observational, retrospective cohort study involved 20 French university hospitals. Eligible patients presented at the emergency departments of the hospitals involved between March 1 and April 30th, 2020, and underwent both thoracic CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing for suspected COVID-19 pneumonia. CT images were read blinded to initial reports, RT-PCR, demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and outcome. Readers classified CT scans as either positive or negative for COVID-19 based on criteria published by the French Society of Radiology. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting severe outcome (intubation or death) at 1-month follow-up in patients positive for both RT-PCR and CT, using clinical and radiologic features. Results Among 10 930 patients screened for eligibility, 10 735 (median age, 65 years; interquartile range, 51-77 years; 6147 men) were included and 6448 (60%) had a positive RT-PCR result. With RT-PCR as reference, the sensitivity and specificity of CT were 80.2% (95% CI: 79.3, 81.2) and 79.7% (95% CI: 78.5, 80.9), respectively, with strong agreement between junior and senior radiologists (Gwet AC1 coefficient, 0.79). Of all the variables analyzed, the extent of pneumonia at CT (odds ratio, 3.25; 95% CI: 2.71, 3.89) was the best predictor of severe outcome at 1 month. A score based solely on clinical variables predicted a severe outcome with an area under the curve of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.66), improving to 0.69 (95% CI: 0.6, 0.71) when it also included the extent of pneumonia and coronary calcium score at CT. Conclusion Using predefined criteria, CT reading is not influenced by reader's experience and helps predict the outcome at 1 month. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04355507 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Rubin in this issue.

Introduction: Lung function in survivors of SARS-Co-V2 pneumonia is poorly known, but concern over the possibility of sequelae exists., Methods: Retrospective study on survivors with confirmed infection and pneumonia on chest-CT. Correlations between PFT and residual radiologic anomalies at three months taking into account initial clinical and radiological severity and steroid use during acute phase., Results: 137 patients (69 men, median age 59 (Q1 50; Q3 68), BMI 27.5 kg/m 2 (25.1; 31.7)) were assessed. Only 32.9% had normal PFT, 75 had altered DLCO. Median (Q1; Q3) values were: VC 79 (66; 92) % pred, FEV1 81 (68; 89), TLC 78 (67; 85), DLCO 60 (44; 72), and KCO 89 (77; 105). Ground glass opacities (GGO) were present in 103 patients (75%), reticulations in 42 (30%), and fibrosis in 18 (13%). There were significantly lower FEV1 (p = 0.0089), FVC (p = 0.0010), TLC (p < 0.0001) and DLCO (p < 0.0001) for patients with GGO, lower TLC (p = 0.0913) and DLCO (p = 0.0181) between patients with reticulations and lower FVC (p = 0.0618), TLC (p = 0.0742) DLCO (p = 0.002) and KCO (p = 0.0114) between patients with fibrosis. Patients with initial ≥50% lung involvement had significantly lower FEV1 (p = 0.0019), FVC (p = 0.0033), TLC (p = 0.0028) and DLCO (p = 0.0003) compared to patients with ≤10%. There was no difference in PFT and residual CT lesions between patients who received steroids and those who did not., Conclusion: The majority of patients have altered PFT at three months, even in patients with mild initial disease, with significantly lower function in patients with residual CT lesions. Steroids do not seem to modify functional and radiological recovery. Long-term follow-up is needed., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Question Addressed by the Study: Methotrexate (MTX) is a key anchor drug for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management. Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common complication of RA. Whether MTX exposure increases the risk of ILD in patients with RA is disputed. We aimed to evaluate the association of prior MTX use with development of RA-ILD., Methods: Through a case-control study design with discovery and international replication samples, we examined the association of MTX exposure with ILD in 410 patients with chronic fibrotic ILD associated with RA (RA-ILD) and 673 patients with RA without ILD. Estimates were pooled over the different samples using meta-analysis techniques., Results: Analysis of the discovery sample revealed an inverse relationship between MTX exposure and RA-ILD (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.022), which was confirmed in the replication samples (pooled adjusted OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.79; p=0.009). The combined estimate using both the derivation and validation samples revealed an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.26-0.69; p=0.0006). MTX ever-users were less frequent among patients with RA-ILD compared to those without ILD, irrespective of chest high-resolution computed tomography pattern. In patients with RA-ILD, ILD detection was significantly delayed in MTX ever-users compared to never-users (11.4±10.4 years and 4.0±7.4 years, respectively; p<0.001)., Answer to the Question: Our results suggest that MTX use is not associated with an increased risk of RA-ILD in patients with RA, and that ILD was detected later in MTX-treated patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: P-A. Juge has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S. Lee reports grants from NIH, personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech and Celgene, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Lau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Kawano-Dourado has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Rojas-Serrano has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sebastiani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Koduri has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Matteson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: K. Bonfiglioli has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Sawamura has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Kairalla has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Cavagna has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Bozzalla Cassione has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Manfredi has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Mejia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Rodríguez-Henriquez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.I. González Pérez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Falfán-Valencia has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Buendia-Roldán has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Pérez-Rubio has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Ebstein reports personal fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Gazal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees for lectures from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Ottaviani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Wallaert reports grants and personal fees for advisory board work and meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Uzunhan reports personal fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support from Oxyvie, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre reports personal fees for advisory board work from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: N. Saidenberg-Kermanac'h has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-C. Boissier has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Wemeau-Stervinou reports personal fees for lectures and travel support from Roche, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and travel support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures from Janssen-Cilag and Bristol-Myers-Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R.M. Flipo reports grants and personal fees from Roche Chugai, Abbvie and Pfizer, personal fees from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: S. Marchand-Adam reports fees for research, lectures, meeting attendance, consultancy and advisory board work from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Richette reports personal fees from Ipsen/Menarini, AstraZeneca, Savient and Grünenthal, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: Y. Allanore reports personal fees from Actelion, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer and Inventiva, grants from Sanofi and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: C. Dromer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-E. Truchetet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Richez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Schaeverbeke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Lioté has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Thabut reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: K.D. Deane has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Solomon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Doyle has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.H. Ryu has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I. Rosas reports personal fees for advisory board work from Genentech, Boehringer and Three Lakes Partners, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V.M. Holers reports grants from NIH/NIAID (U01 Grant), during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: C. Boileau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray reports personal fees and non-financial support for travel to meetings from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Porcher has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D.A. Schwartz reports grants from NIH-NHLBI (P01 HL092870, R01 HL097163, R33 HL120770 and UH2 HL123442) and DOD Focused Program (W81XWH-17-1-0597), during the conduct of the study; personal fees for consultancy and advisory board work from NuMedii, Inc., and is an employee of Eleven P15, Inc., outside the submitted work; and has a patent Compositions and Methods of Treating or Preventing Fibrotic Diseases pending, a patent Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Fibrotic Lung Disease pending, and a patent Methods and Compositions for Risk Prediction, Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Pulmonary Disorders issued. Conflict of interest: R. Vassallo reports grants from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and SunPharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani reports grants from Apellis and MedImmune, grants and personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Dieudé reports fees for consultancy from Pfizer, Abbvie and MSD, grants and personal fees for consultancy and lectures from Roche, Chugai and BMS, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Objectives: To assess interobserver agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19., Methods: From 16 to 24 March 2020, 241 consecutive patients addressed to hospital for COVID-19 suspicion had both chest CT and SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR. Eight observers (2 thoracic and 2 general senior radiologists, 2 junior radiologists, and 2 emergency physicians) retrospectively categorized each CT into one out of 4 categories (evocative, compatible for COVID-19 pneumonia, not evocative, and normal). Observer agreement for categorization between all readers and pairs of readers with similar experience was evaluated with the Kappa coefficient. The results of a consensus categorization were correlated to RT-PCR., Results: Observer agreement across the 4 categories was good between all readers (κ value 0.61 95% CI 0.60-0.63) and moderate to good between pairs of readers (0.54-0.75). It was very good (κ 0.81 95% CI 0.79-0.83), fair (κ 0.32 95% CI 0.29-0.34), moderate (κ 0.56 95% CI 0.54-0.58), and moderate (0.58 95% CI 0.56-0.61) for the categories evocative, compatible, not evocative, and normal, respectively. RT-PCR was positive in 97%, 50%, 31%, and 11% of cases in the respective categories. Observer agreement was lower (p < 0.001) and RT-PCR positive cases less frequently categorized evocative in the presence of an underlying pulmonary disease (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting using categorization of findings is good in patients suspected of COVID-19. Among patients considered for hospitalization in an epidemic context, CT categorized evocative is highly predictive of COVID-19, whereas the predictive value of CT decreases between the categories compatible and not evocative., Key Points: • In patients suspected of COVID-19, interobserver agreement for chest CT reporting into categories is good, and very good to categorize CT "evocative." • Chest CT can participate in estimating the likelihood of COVID-19 in patients presenting to hospital during the outbreak, CT categorized "evocative" being highly predictive of the disease whereas almost a third of patients with CT "not evocative" had a positive RT-PCR in our study. • Observer agreement is lower and CTs of positive RT-PCR cases less frequently "evocative" in presence of an underlying pulmonary disease.

Case Presentation: A 29-year-old man with no significant medical history presented to the ED with a 4-week history of chest pain. The pain was insidious, located on the right side of the chest, increased by deep breathing, and incompletely alleviated by acetaminophen. The patient had never smoked tobacco. He denied any recent fevers, chills, dyspnea, cough, night sweats, hemoptysis, or history of trauma but had lost at least 8 kg in the past 6 months. The patient was from Morocco and had lived in France for 1 year., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Asthma is a common disease whose diagnosis does not typically rely on the results of imaging. However, chest CT has gained a key place over the last decade to support the management of patients with difficult to treat and severe asthma., State of the Art: Bronchial wall thickening and mild dilatation or narrowing of bronchial lumen are frequently observed on chest CT in people with asthma. Bronchial wall thickening is correlated to the degree of obstruction and to bronchial wall remodeling and inflammation. Diverse conditions which can mimic asthma should be recognized on CT, including endobronchial tumours, interstitial pneumonias, bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis. Ground-glass opacities and consolidation may be related to transient eosinophilic infiltrates, infection or an associated disease (vasculitis, chronic eosinophilic pneumonia). Hyperdense mucous plugging is highly specific for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis., Perspectives: Airway morphometry, air trapping and quantitative analysis of ventilatory defects, with CT or MRI, can help to identify different morphological subgroups of patients with different functional or inflammatory characteristics. These imaging tools could emerge as new biomarkers for the evaluation of treatment response., Conclusion: Chest CT is indicated in people with severe asthma to search for additional or alternative diagnoses. Quantitative imaging may contribute to phenotyping this patient group., (Copyright © 2020 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: A concern about the susceptibility of immunocompromised patients to the worldwide pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been raised. We aimed at describing COVID-19 infections in the French cohort of lung transplant (LT) patients., Methods: Multicenter nationwide cohort study of all LT recipients with COVID-19 diagnosed from March 1 to May 19, 2020. Recipient main characteristics and their management were retrieved. Hospitalization characteristics, occurrence of complications and survival were analyzed., Results: Thirty-five LT patients with a COVID-19 infection were included. Median age was 50.4 (40.6-62.9) years, 16 (45.7%) were female, and 80% were double-LT recipients. Infection was community-acquired in 25 (71.4%). Thirty-one (88.6%) required hospitalization, including 13 (41.9%) in the intensive care unit. The main symptoms of COVID-19 were fever, cough, and diarrhea, present in 71.4%, 54.3%, and 31.4% of cases, respectively. Extension of pneumonia on chest CT was moderate to severe in 51.4% of cases. Among the 13 critically ill patients, 7 (53.9%) received invasive mechanical ventilation. Thrombotic events occurred in 4 patients. Overall survival rate was 85.7% after a median follow-up of 50 days (41.0-56.5). Four of 5 nonsurvivors had had bronchial complications or intensification of immunosuppression in the previous weeks. On univariate analysis, overweight was significantly associated with risk of death (odds ratio, 16.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-170.6; P = 0.02)., Conclusions: For the 35 LT recipients with COVID-19, the presentation was severe, requiring hospitalization in most cases, with a survival rate of 85.7%., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) can be caused by mutations in the SFTPA1 and SFTPA2 genes, which encode the surfactant protein (SP) complex SP-A. Only 11 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations have so far been reported worldwide, of which five have been functionally assessed. In the framework of ILD molecular diagnosis, we identified 14 independent patients with pathogenic SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations. The present study aimed to functionally assess the 11 different mutations identified and to accurately describe the disease phenotype of the patients and their affected relatives., Methods: The consequences of the 11 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations were analysed both in vitro , by studying the production and secretion of the corresponding mutated proteins and ex vivo , by analysing SP-A expression in lung tissue samples. The associated disease phenotypes were documented., Results: For the 11 identified mutations, protein production was preserved but secretion was abolished. The expression pattern of lung SP-A available in six patients was altered and the family history reported ILD and/or lung adenocarcinoma in 13 out of 14 families (93%). Among the 28 SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutation carriers, the mean age at ILD onset was 45 years (range 0.6-65 years) and 48% underwent lung transplantation (mean age 51 years). Seven carriers were asymptomatic., Discussion: This study, which expands the molecular and clinical spectrum of SP-A disorders, shows that pathogenic SFTPA1 or SFTPA2 mutations share similar consequences for SP-A secretion in cell models and in lung tissue immunostaining, whereas they are associated with a highly variable phenotypic expression of disease, ranging from severe forms requiring lung transplantation to incomplete penetrance., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M. Legendre has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Butt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. Borie reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, and personal fees from Savapharma, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M-P. Debray has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Bouvry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Filhol-Blin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T. Desroziers has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Nau has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Copin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Dastot Le Moal has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Héry has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Duquesnoy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Allou has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Bergeron has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Bermudez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Cazes has been invited to national and international meetings, and/or has received grants and/or personal fees for various activities from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A-L. Chene has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: V. Cottin reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Actelion; grants, personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees for advisory board and data monitoring committee work from Bayer/MSD and Galapagos; personal fees for lectures and advisory board work from Novartis; personal fees for lectures, consultancy, data monitoring committee and steering committee work, and non-financial support for meeting attendance from Roche/Promedior; personal fees for lectures from Sanofi and AstraZeneca; personal fees for data monitoring committee work from Celgene and Galecto; and personal fees for advisory board work from Shionogi, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Crestani has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J-C. Dalphin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Dombret has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Doray has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Dupin reports personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support and meeting invitations from AstraZeneca; personal fees for lectures, non-financial support and meeting invitations from Boehringer and Novartis; personal fees for research and lectures, and non-financial support and meeting invitations from GSK; personal fees for lectures and meeting invitations from Chiesi; personal fees for lectures and advisory board work, and non-financial support from Sanofi; and personal fees, non-financial support and meeting invitations from Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: V. Giraud has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Gondouin has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Gouya has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Israël-Biet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Kannengiesser has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Le Borgne has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Leroy has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Longchampt has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Lorillon has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Nunes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: C. Picard has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Reynaud-Gaubert has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Traclet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. de Vuyst has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Coulomb L'Hermine has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. Clement has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Amselem has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N. Nathan reports a 2018 AstraZeneca Mobility Grant from Société de pneumologie pédiatrique et d'allergologie (France), outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Background: The optimal treatment for patients with severe coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) and hyper-inflammation remains debated., Material and Methods: A cohort study was designed to evaluate whether a therapeutic algorithm using steroids with or without interleukin-1 antagonist (anakinra) could prevent death/invasive ventilation. Patients with a ≥5-day evolution since symptoms onset, with hyper-inflammation (CRP≥50mg/L), requiring 3-5 L/min oxygen, received methylprednisolone alone. Patients needing ≥6 L/min received methylprednisolone + subcutaneous anakinra daily either frontline or in case clinical deterioration upon corticosteroids alone. Death rate and death or intensive care unit (ICU) invasive ventilation rate at Day 15, with Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% CIs, were determined according to logistic regression and propensity scores. A Bayesian analysis estimated the treatment effects., Results: Of 108 consecutive patients, 70 patients received glucocorticoids alone. The control group comprised 63 patients receiving standard of care. In the corticosteroid±stanakinra group (n = 108), death rate was 20.4%, versus 30.2% in the controls, indicating a 30% relative decrease in death risk and a number of 10 patients to treat to avoid a death (p = 0.15). Using propensity scores a per-protocol analysis showed an OR for COVID-19-related death of 0.9 (95%CI [0.80-1.01], p = 0.067). On Bayesian analysis, the posterior probability of any mortality benefit with corticosteroids+/-anakinra was 87.5%, with a 7.8% probability of treatment-related harm. Pre-existing diabetes exacerbation occurred in 29 of 108 patients (26.9%)., Conclusion: In COVID-19 non-ICU inpatients at the cytokine release phase, corticosteroids with or without anakinra were associated with a 30% decrease of death risk on Day 15., Competing Interests: Raphael Borie, Laurent Savalle, Antoine Dossier, Camille Taillé, Benoit Visseaux, Kamel Jebreen, Sébastien Ottaviani, Chloe Tesmoingt, Lise Morer, Tiphaine Goletto, Nathalie Faucher, Linda Hajouji, Catherine Neukirch, Mathilde Phillips, Sandrine Stelianides, Solenn Brosseau, Johan Pluvy, Marie Pierre Debray, Raynaud-Simon Agathe, Antoine Khalil, Vincent Descamps, Thomas Papo, Marc Humbert, Bruno Crestani, Eric Vicaut, Gérard Zalcman have nothing to disclose. Jean Francois Timsit reported participation to an advisory board from Gilead. Is the principal investigator of PHRC-N 'Covidicus' (Dexamethasone vs. Placebo on Covid-19 pneumonia in ICUs) granted by the French Ministry of Health. Jade Ghosn reported receiving Jade Ghosn reported receiving travel grants and fundings from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare and MSD. Benoit Visseaux reported grants from QIAGEN outside the scope of the current work Xavier Lescure reported travel grants and fundings from from Gilead, MSD, Astellas, Eumedica. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.