Search

Objectives: Although routine disinfection of portable medical equipment is required in most hospitals, frontline staff may not be able to disinfect portable medical equipment at a rate that adequately maintains low bioburden on high-use equipment. This study quantified bioburden over an extended time period for two types of portable medical equipment, workstations on wheels and vitals machines, across three hospital wards. Methods: Bioburden was quantified via press plate samples taken from high touch surfaces on 10 workstations on wheels and 5 vitals machines on each of 3 medical surgical units. The samples were taken at three timepoints each day over a 4-week period, with random rotation of timepoints and portable medical equipment, such that frontline staff were not aware at which timepoint their portable medical equipment would be sampled. The mean bioburden from the different locations and portable medical equipment was estimated and compared with Bayesian multilevel negative binomial regression models. Results: Model estimated mean colony counts (95% credible interval) were 14.4 (7.7–26.7) for vitals machines and 29.2 (16.1–51.1) for workstations on wheels. For the workstations on wheel, colony counts were lower on the mouse, 0.22 (0.16–0.29), tray, 0.29 (0.22, 0.38), and keyboard, 0.43 (0.32–0.55), when compared to the arm, as assessed by incident rate ratios. Conclusions: Although routine disinfection is required, bioburden is still present across portable medical equipment on a variety of surfaces. The difference in bioburden levels among surfaces likely reflects differences in touch patterns for the different portable medical equipment and surfaces on the portable medical equipment. Although the association of portable medical equipment bioburden to healthcare-associated infection transmission was not assessed, this study provides evidence for the potential of portable medical equipment as a vector for healthcare-associated infection transmission despite hospital disinfection requirements.

Abstract Background Hospital environment in patient care has been linked on healthcare-associated infections (HAI). No touch disinfection technologies that utilize pulsed xenon ultraviolet light has been recognized to prevent infection in contaminated environments. The purpose of this study was: 1) to evaluate the effectiveness of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light (PX-UV) disinfection for the reduction of bacteria on environmental surfaces of Hospital General Enrique Garcés, and 2) to evaluate the in-vitro efficacy against multi-drug resistance microorganisms. Methods This was a quality-improvement study looking at cleaning and disinfection of patient areas. During the study, a total of 146 surfaces from 17 rooms were sampled in a secondary 329-bed public medical center. Microbiological samples of high-touch surfaces were taken after terminal manual cleaning and after pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection. Cleaning staff were blinded to the study purpose and told clean following their usual protocols. For positive cultures PCR identification for carbapenemase-resistance genes (blaKPC, blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaNDM) were analyzed and confirmed by sequencing. The total number of colony forming units (CFU) were obtained and statistical analyses were conducted using Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests to evaluate the difference in CFU between terminal manual cleaning and after pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection. Results After manual disinfection of 124 surfaces showed a total of 3569 CFU which dropped to 889 CFU in 80 surfaces after pulsed xenon disinfection (p