Search

Introduction: The CLEOPATRA trial (NCT00567190) established a dual anti-HER2 blockade in combination with docetaxel as the first-line standard of care for patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. While this treatment is overall associated with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), not all patients respond equally. We hypothesized that a radiological complete response (CR) at week 9 (i.e., first disease re-evaluation) is associated with prolonged OS and PFS compared to radiological partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD)., Methods: We performed an exploratory analysis of the CLEOPATRA study to address this question., Results: Out of 362 patients treated with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab eligible for our analysis, 46 (12.7%) had radiological CR at week 9, 243 (67.1%) PR, and 73 (20.2%) SD per central RECIST v1.0. Radiological CR at first tumor re-evaluation was associated with a 60% risk reduction for death compared to SD (adjusted HR = 0.40 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.70), whereas no significant impact on survival was observed for PR (adjusted HR = 0.85 95% CI 0.60-1.20). The same was observed for PFS with adjusted HR = 0.30 (95% CI 0.18-0.48) for the CR subgroup and adjusted HR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.60-1.09) for the PR subgroup. In multivariate analysis, no variables were associated with radiological CR., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that radiological CR at first disease re-evaluation is associated with more prolonged survival; this might result from stronger dependence on HER2 pathway addiction, supporting the need for further translational research., Competing Interests: Disclosure VD, MB, MC, FJ: none; EA: consultancy fee/honoraria from Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca. Research grant to my Institution from Gilead; Support to attend medical conferences (travel/accommodation/expenses) from Novartis, Roche, Eli Lilly, Genetic, IstitutoGentili, Daiichi Sankyo (all outside the submitted work); CM: honoraria from Novartis and Lilly; DMB: declares full-time employment from the European Society for Medical Oncology since September 1, 2023; speaker's engagement from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; meeting/travel grant from Novartis; institutional research funding from Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Novartis; non-remunerated activity as a member of the board of directors for Associaҫão de Investigaҫão e Cuidados de Suporte em Oncologia; non-remunerated leadership role as prior Portuguese Young Oncologists; Committee Chair of Sociedade Portuguesa de Oncologia; GNM: support to attend medical conferences: Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work); ML: honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Seagen, MSD, Exact Sciences, Takeda, Ipsen, Sandoz, Libbsand Knight, a travel grant from Gilead and research support (to the Institution) from Gilead (all outside the submitted work); EdA: honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbsand Pierre Fabre. Travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis. Research grant to his institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier(all outside the submitted work)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To assess whether erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) administration impacts the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC)., Methods: ALTTO (NCT00490139) patients were categorized by ESA use during adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. Disease-free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time-to-distant recurrence (TTDR) were analyzed by ESA administration, with subgroup analyses according to prognostic factors. Log-rank tests and Cox modeling were performed. Adverse events (AEs) of ESA-interest were compared., Results: Among 8381 patients recruited in ALTTO, 123 (1.5%) received ESA concomitantly with study treatment. The median age of patients receiving ESA was 54 years, 39.0% premenopausal, most had tumor size > 2 cm (56.9%), node-positive (58.5%), and positive estrogen receptor expression (61.8%). Median follow-up was shorter in the ESA group [6.1 years (IQR 5.3-7.0) vs. 6.9 years (6.0-7.1); p < 0.001]. There was no DFS difference by ESA administration (log-rank p = 0.70), with 3- and 7-year DFS of 89.2% (95% CI 81.8-93.8%) and 81.6% (71.4-88.5%) in ESA group vs. 88.3% (87.6-89.0%) and 80.0% (79.1-80.9%) in No-ESA group. In subgroup analyses, the interaction of ESA administration with menopausal status was statistically significant (unadjusted p = 0.024; stratified p = 0.033), favoring premenopausal women receiving ESA. We observed no significant association of ESA administration with OS (log-rank p = 0.57; 7-year OS in ESA 88.6% vs. 90.0% in non-ESA) or TTDR. ESA-interest AEs were experienced by eight (6.5%) patients receiving ESA and 417 (5.1%) in the No-ESA group (p = 0.41)., Conclusion: ESA administration to patients receiving adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive EBC was safe and not associated with a negative impact on survival outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Chemo-immunotherapy is the first-line standard of care for patients with PD-L1 positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SYNERGY (NCT03616886) is a dose-finding phase I and a randomized phase II, open-label trial evaluating if targeting the immunosuppressive adenosine pathway can enhance the antitumor activity of chemo-immunotherapy. The phase I part included 6 patients with untreated locally-advanced or mTNBC to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab in combination with the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab and 12 cycles of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. In the phase II part, 127 women were randomized 1:1 to receive chemo-immunotherapy, with (arm A) or without (arm B) oleclumab. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at week 24, defined as stable disease, partial or complete response per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response, survival outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival), and safety. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint, as the 24-week clinical benefit rate was not significantly improved by adding oleclumab (43% vs. 44%, p = 0.61). Exploratory median progression-free survival was 5.9 months in arm A as compared to 7.0 months in arm B (p = 0.90). The safety profile was manageable in both arms., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Up to 20% of breast cancer overexpress HER2 protein, making it a reliable target for antibody-based treatments. In early HER2-positive breast cancer avoiding anthracycline-based chemotherapy is a challenge. Based on the single-arm phase II APT trial results, adjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab is an accepted regimen for patients with stage I HER2-positive disease. In our retrospective study of 240 patients, the median tumor size was 12.0 mm (IQR 9 -15), and 204 (85%) had estrogen receptor-positive disease. After a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 3-year real-world disease-free survival, distant DFS, and overall survival were 98.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 96.2-99.6), 99.2% (95% CI, 96.7-99.8), and 98.3% (95% CI, 96.2-99.6), respectively. In a real-world setting, an adjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab regimen was associated with low recurrence rates among women with stage I, HER2-positive breast cancer. Additionally, we reviewed other treatment optimization strategies attempted or ongoing in HER2-positive breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest VD, MS, FJ, MM, MP, IS, WH: none. GNM: Travel grants for meetings from Roche and Bayer, outside the submitted work. EA: Speaking fee/consultancy: Eli Lilly, Sandoz, AstraZeneca. Support to attend medical conferences from Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, Genetics, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo (all outside the present work). CM: receive fees from Novartis and Lilly outside the submitted work.Ugo De Giorgi received honoraria for advisory boards or speaker fees for Pfizer, BMS, MSD, PharmaMar, Astellas, Bayer, Ipsen, Roche, Novartis, Clovis, GSK, AstraZeneca, Institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, Sanofi and Roche all outside the submitted work. UDG: Advisory boards: Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Roche; Institutional research grant: AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi. AS: Advisory Board: BMS (BRISTOL-MYERS-SQUIBB), Servier,Gilead, Pfizer, Eisai, Bayer, MSD (MERCK SHARP & DOHME); Consultancy: Arqule, Sanofi, Incyte; Speaker’s Bureau: Takeda, BMS, Roche, Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Servier, Gilead, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Arqule, Lilly, Sandoz, Eisai, Novartis, Bayer, MSD. DT: advisory board: Agendia, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, Roche; Travel: AstraZeneca,Pfizer, Roche. FPD: Advisory Board: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sceince, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Seagen; Contracted Research: Fondation belge contre le cancer; Institutional grant: AstraZeneca. AB: Advisory board: Argen, BMS, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. GB: Advisory board: BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Travel: BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. ML: reports advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Seagen, Gilead, MSD and Exact Sciences; speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Libbs, Daiichi Sankyo and Takeda; Travel Grants from Gilead; Research funding (to the Institution) from Gilead outside the submitted work. EdA: Honoraria and/or advisory board from Roche/GNE, Novartis, SeaGen, Zodiac, Libbs, Pierre Fabre, Lilly, Astra-Zeneca; travel grants from Roche/GNE and Astra-Zeneca; Research grant to my institution from Roche/GNE, AstraZeneca, and GSK/Novartis. MP: Board Member (Scientific Board): Oncolytics; Consultant (honoraria): AstraZeneca, Camel-IDS/Precirix, Gilead, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Immutep, Seagen, NBE Therapeutics, Frame Therapeutics; Research grants to my Institute: AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Radius, Roche-Genentech, Servier, Synthon., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched intrinsic subtype represents up to 75% of all HER2-positive hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer (BC). Optimizing HER2-targeting therapy in this population might allow the omission of anthracycline-based chemotherapy, which is associated with potentially severe toxicities. DECRESCENDO (NCT04675827) is a large, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial in patients with HR-negative, HER2-positive, node-negative early BC evaluating a neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab fixed-dose combination administered subcutaneously plus taxane-based chemotherapy followed by adjuvant treatment, adapted according to response to neoadjuvant therapy. The primary end point is the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate in patients with 'HER2-enriched' tumors and a pathological complete response. This flexible care substudy offers adjuvant treatment administration outside the hospital to some patients.

Background: At metastatic stage, treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) relies in first line on mitotane therapy, combination of mitotane with locoregional therapies or cisplatin-based chemotherapy according to initial presentation. In second line, ESMO-EURACAN recommendations favour enrolment of patients in clinical trials investigating experimental therapies. However, the benefit of this approach remains unknown., Methods: The aim of our retrospective study was to analyse the inclusion and outcomes of all patients of the French cohort ENDOCAN-COMETE included in early clinical trials between 2009 and 2019., Results: Of the 141 patients for whom a local or national multidisciplinary tumour board recommended, as first choice, to look for clinical trial, 27 patients (19%) were enroled in 30 early clinical trials. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.02 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]; 2.3-4.6) and median overall survival (OS) was 10.2 months (95% CI; 7.13-16.3) while the best response, evaluable in 28 of 30 trial participants according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, was partial response for 3 patients (11%) stable disease for 14 patients (50%) and progressive disease for 11 patients (39%), resulting in a disease control rate of 61%. Median growth modulation index (GMI) in our cohort was 1.32, with a significantly prolonged PFS in 52% of the patients compared to the previous line. The Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) prognostic score was not associated with OS in this cohort., Conclusion: Our study suggests that patients with metastatic ACC benefit from inclusion in early clinical trials in second line. As recommended, if a clinical trial is available, it should be the first choice for suitable patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a class of antineoplastic agents whose structure is composed of three main components: a monoclonal antibody (mAB) targeting a specific target antigen, a cytotoxic payload, and a linker binding the antibody to the payload. By combining the specificity of mABs with the high potency of the payloads, ADCs constitute a smart drug delivery system with improved therapeutic index. After recognition and binding of the mAB to its target surface antigen, ADCs are internalized by endocytosis by the tumor cell, releasing the payloads into the cytoplasm, where they exert their cytotoxic activity, eventually leading to cell death. The composition of some of the new ADCs confers additional functional properties that allow expanding their activity to neighboring cells not expressing the target antigen, constituting a valuable strategy to overcome tumor heterogeneity. Some of these 'off-target effects', such as the bystander effect, are possibly the mechanism underlying the antitumor activity demonstrated in patients with low expression of the target antigens, which represents an important paradigm shift in anticancer targeted therapy. Three ADCs are currently approved for the treatment of breast cancer (BC); two anti-HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) ADCs (trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan); and one Trop-2-targeted ADC (sacituzumab govitecan). Based on the unprecedented efficacy data demonstrated by these agents, ADCs have been incorporated as part of standard regimens for all subtypes of advanced BC, as well as for high-risk early HER2-positive BC. Despite the remarkable advances, several hurdles still remain to overcome, including the development of reliable biomarkers for patient selection, prevention, and management of potentially severe toxicities, ADC resistance mechanisms, post-ADC resistance patterns, and optimal treatment sequencing and combinations. In this review, we will summarize the currently available evidence related to the use of these agents, as well as explore the current landscape of ADC development for BC treatment., (© The Author(s), 2023.)

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the immune response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 prime-vaccination in patients with cancer., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library until 28/09/2021, and conference proceedings from ASCO and ESMO 2021 annual meetings. We screened for observational or interventional studies including subjects ≥ 16 years old with cancer diagnosis who were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Prime-vaccination was defined as one dose of Ad26.COV2-S vaccine or two doses of BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1-S or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The outcomes were humoral and adaptive immune responses (proportion of subjects with positive titers of antibody anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and anti-SARS-CoV-2 cellular responses, respectively)., Results: We included 89 records reporting data from 30,183 subjects. The overall seropositive rate within the first month after complete anti-SARS-CoV-2 prime-vaccination was 80% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72-86%], 60% (95%CI, 53-67%) in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) versus 94% (95%CI, 88-97%) in patients with solid malignancies (SM). The diagnosis of HM was significantly associated with a lower seropositive rate on multivariate meta-regression (odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.69, HM versus both, p = 0.002). The overall humoral response was 49% (95% CI, 42-56%) after incomplete prime-vaccination and 79% (95% CI, 70-86%) at 2 months after complete prime-vaccination. These responses were also lower in patients with HM at these time points. The overall cellular response rate at any time after vaccination was 61% (95% CI, 44-76%)., Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides compelling evidence of humoral and adaptive immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer, which last for at least 2 months following complete prime-vaccination., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Triple-positive breast tumors overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and are positive for hormone receptor (HR) expression. Data from real-life and clinical trials show that estrogen receptor (ER) expression affects the response to combinations of anti-HER2 and associated systemic therapies. Despite triple-positive tumors having decreased response rates compared to HR-negative/HER2-positive breast cancers, optimizing anti-HER2 treatment with dual anti-HER2 blockade remains important for optimal disease control. Preclinical data on the cross-talk between ER and growth factor receptor pathways show the efficacy of combinations of endocrine therapy and anti-HER2 drugs, which is confirmed in the clinic. Molecular dissection of triple-positive breast cancer might provide the rational for additional therapeutic strategies and the identification of promising biomarkers. This review summarizes data on systemic treatment efficacy from major clinical trials and perspectives for future clinical research in triple-positive breast cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Recent progress in immunobiology has led the way to successful host immunity enhancement against breast cancer. In triple-negative breast cancer, the combination of cancer immunotherapy based on PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy was effective both in advanced and early setting phase 3 clinical trials. These encouraging results lead to the first approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer and thus offer new therapeutic possibilities in aggressive tumors and hard-to-treat populations. Furthermore, several ongoing trials are investigating combining immunotherapies involving immune checkpoint inhibitors with conventional therapies and as well as with other immunotherapeutic strategies such as cancer vaccines, CAR-T cells, bispecific antibodies, and oncolytic viruses in all breast cancer subtypes. This review provides an overview of immunotherapies currently under clinical development and updated key results from clinical trials. Finally, we discuss the challenges to the successful implementation of immune treatment in managing breast cancer and their implications for the design of future clinical trials., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a poor prognosis and a paucity of therapeutic options. In recent years, immunotherapy has emerged as a new treatment option for patients with TNBC. However, this therapeutic evolution is paralleled by a growing need for biomarkers which allow for a better selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from this immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimen. These biomarkers will not only facilitate a better optimization of treatment strategies, but they will also avoid unnecessary side effects in non-responders, and limit the increasing financial toxicity linked to the use of these agents. Huge efforts have been deployed to identify predictive biomarkers for the ICI, but until now, the fruits of this labor remained largely unsatisfactory. Among clinically validated biomarkers, only programmed death-ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) expression has been prospectively assessed in TNBC trials. In addition to this, microsatellite instability and a high tumor mutational burden are approved as tumor agnostic biomarkers, but only a small percentage of TNBC fits this category. Furthermore, TNBC should no longer be approached as a single biological entity, but rather as a complex disease with different molecular, clinicopathological, and tumor microenvironment subgroups. This review provides an overview of the validated and evolving predictive biomarkers for a response to ICI in TNBC.

Background: For patients with metastatic rare cancers, treatments are limited. How systematic tumor sequencing can improve therapeutic possibilities in this population?, Patients and Methods: Patients with rare cancer were identified in the MOSCATO-01 trial. Patients' outcome was measured by progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)., Results: The most frequently identified histologic subypes were ovarian adenocarcinoma (N = 13), carcinoma of unknown primary (N = 11), and leiomyosarcoma (N = 10). Ninety-nine (39%) of them had at least one targetable cancer molecular alteration Forty-nine patients (50%) received the therapy proposed by the molecular tumor board, and 13 patients (26%, 95%CI 15-41%) achieved a PFS2/PFS1 > 1.3. The median PFS2 on matched treatment subgroup was 2.3 months (95% CI 1.8-3.6) and the median OS was 11.4 months (95% CI 9-15.5)., Conclusions: The molecular screening of patients with refractory, metastatic rare cancers might increase the therapeutic options. Facilitating access strategy to molecular-driven clinical trials or agnostic-approved treatment is crucial., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pre-surgical treatments in patients with early breast cancer allows a direct estimation of treatment efficacy, by comparing the tumor and the treatment. Patients who achieve a pathological complete response at surgery have a better prognosis, with lower risk of disease recurrence and death. Hence, clinical research efforts have been focusing on high-risk patients with residual disease at surgery, who may be "salvaged" through additional treatments administered in the post-neoadjuvant setting. In the present review, we aim to illustrate the development and advantages of the post-neoadjuvant setting, and to discuss the available strategies for patients with early breast cancer, either approved or under investigation. This review was written after literature search on main scientific databases (e.g., PubMed) and conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 1 August 2022. T-DM1 and capecitabine are currently approved as post-neoadjuvant treatments for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively, with residual disease at surgery. More recently, other treatment strategies have been approved for patients with high-risk early breast cancer, including the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab, the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib. Novel agents and treatment combinations are currently under investigation as promising post-neoadjuvant treatment strategies.

Background: Patients with small node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer are commonly treated with paclitaxel and 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. We performed a sub-analysis of the ALTTO trial to explore the long-term outcomes of patients with small node-negative tumours., Methods: The ALTTO trial randomised 8381 patients with early HER2-positive BC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline/taxane- or taxane/carboplatin-based), to trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L), their sequence (T → L) or their combination (L + T). Patients with tumours ≤3 cm and node-negative were included in this sub-analysis., Results: A total of 2821 patients were analysed (median follow-up of 7 years). The median age was 52 years, and most patients had tumours ≤2 cm (64.3%). The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 88.1% (95% CI: 86.7-89.3%). DFS was similar for arms T, T + L and T⟶L and significantly lower for arm L (stratified log-rank P = 0.031). The 7-year overall survival rate was 95.9% (95% CI: [95.0-96.6%) and the 7-year time-to-distant recurrence was 93.4% (95% CI: 92.3-94.4%)., Conclusion: With most patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens, ALTTO shows that patients with small tumours treated with trastuzumab and concomitant chemotherapy have excellent long-term outcomes, similar to those of the APT trial., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00490139., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer represents a heterogeneous breast cancer subtype, including both oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and negative tumours. A deeper understanding of the crosstalk between ER and HER2 receptor pathways has led to the development of treatment strategies consisting of a simultaneous blockade of both signalling pathways, as a reasonable approach to prevent the onset of mechanisms of resistance., Methods: This review was based on the material searched on PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase databases and on conference proceedings from major oncology conferences up to 15 December 2020. The search strategy included the following keywords: 'HER2-positive breast cancer', 'CDK4-6 inhibitors' and 'PI3K inhibitors', and was adapted for use with different bibliographic databases., Results: CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors are two classes of agents already approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Recently, promising data with their use have been also shown in HER2+ disease. Results from preclinical and clinical studies are shedding light on the role of these classes of agents in HER2+ breast cancer, and are paving the road for a forthcoming change in clinical practice., Conclusions: Treatment landscape for HER2+ breast cancer is rapidly changing, and CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors represent a new promising strategy to improve patients' outcomes., (© 2021 Stichting European Society for Clinical Investigation Journal Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We aimed to determine the distribution of intrinsic subtypes within HER2-low breast cancer (BC), and to describe the prognostic impact of HER2-low status on survival outcomes., Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study of primary BC extracted from The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. We described the distribution of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes within HER2-low BC subtype according to hormonal receptor status (positive (HR+) and negative (HR-)). Secondly, we assessed the impact of HER2-low on survival outcomes (progression-free interval (PFI), disease-free interval (DFI), and overall survival (OS))., Results: We analyzed 804 primary BCs, including 410 (51%) HER2-low BCs (336 HR+ and 74 HR-). The proportion of HER2-enriched tumors was higher in the HER2-low/HR- group compared to HER2-low/HR+ (13.7% versus 1.2%, respectively). HER2-enriched tumors were more frequent in HER2-low/HR- and HER2-low/HR+ subtypes, compared to HER2-negative/HR- and HER2-negative/HR+ subtypes, respectively (13.7% versus 1.6% and 1.2% versus 0.5%, respectively). We observed no significant differences in PFI, DFI, and OS between HER2-low subtypes and each non-HER2-low subtype paired by HR status., Conclusions: Our characterization of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes within HER2-low breast cancer may explain the different clinical behaviors and responses to treatment, and ultimately support further investigation of new treatment strategies in the HER2-low category. Moreover, it highlights the importance of considering HR status in the HER2-low category.

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) have an unpredictable natural history. The identification of both blood and tumor immune features associated with patients' outcomes remains limited. Herein, we evaluated the best prognostic value of the neutrophils-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in a cohort of 144 pNETs. The NLR ≥ 4 was associated with worse overall survival in both univariate analysis (HR = 3.53, CI95% = 1.50-8.31, p = 0.004) and multivariate analysis (HR = 2.57, CI95% = 1.061-6.216, p = 0.036). The presence of synchronous liver metastasis was identified as a prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (HR = 3.35, CI95% = 1.411-7.973, p = 0.006). Interestingly, the absolute tumor-associated neutrophils count was higher in liver metastasis as compared to their paired primary tumor ( p = 0.048). Deconvolution of immune cells from the transcriptome of 83 primary tumors and 30 liver metastases reveals enrichment for neutrophils in metastasis relative to primary tumors ( p = 0.005), and this was associated with upregulation of the complement pathway (NES = 1.84, p < 0.0001). Combining neutrophils signature and complement pathway genes, unsupervised clustering identified two pNETs subgroups, namely Neu-Comp1 and Neu-Comp2. Characterized by neutrophils infiltration and activation of the complement pathway, Neu-Comp1 was highly enriched for metastatic liver samples as compared to Neu-Comp2 ( p < 0.0001). These data suggest the possible link between liver metastasis, complement pathway activation, and neutrophils infiltration in well-differentiated pNET and open avenues for targeting complement pathways in these tumors.

Sarcomatoid features in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have long been associated with dismal prognosis and poor response to therapy, while biological mechanisms underpinning sarcomatoid dedifferentiation remained obscure. Several efforts have been conducted to break down the molecular profile of sarcomatoid RCC and investigate different targeted therapeutic approaches. Mutations enriched for in sarcomatoid RCC involve, notably, TP53 , BAP1 , cell cycle, and chromatin-remodeling genes. The immunological landscape of these tumors is also gradually being uncovered, showing frequent expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. These features may be major determinants for the activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population, which has been confirmed by retrospective studies and subgroup analyses of large randomized phase 3 trials. Combinations based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition have demonstrated response rates and complete responses in >50% and >10% of patients in the first-line metastatic setting, respectively, with median overall survival exceeding two years. This remarkable improvement in outcomes effectively establishes immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations as a new standard of care in patients with sarcomatoid RCC. New research fields, including epigenetic regulations and tumor-microenvironment interactions, may further sharpen understanding of sarcomatoid RCC and advance therapeutic developments.