Search

Cariprazine, a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic with preferential binding to D3 receptors, is Food and Drug Administration approved for treating schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. A post-hoc safety/tolerability analysis of data from the four acute trials in the cariprazine schizophrenia clinical development program (NCT00404573; NCT00694707; NCT01104766; NCT01104779) was carried out using the overall safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug) and modal daily dose subgroups (1.5-3, 4.5-6, and 9-12 mg/day). These exploratory findings were summarized using descriptive statistics. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events versus placebo was similar for cariprazine 1.5-3 mg/day and higher for cariprazine 4.5-6 and 9-12 mg/day; a dose-response relationship was observed for akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms, and diastolic blood pressure. The mean changes in metabolic parameters were generally similar in cariprazine-treated and placebo-treated patients. There was no prolactin level increase or QTc value greater than 500 ms; small increases in mean body weight (∼1to2 kg) versus placebo were observed. Within the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose range (1.5-6 mg/day), cariprazine was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia.

Background: Atypical antipsychotics have broad-spectrum efficacy against core symptoms of acute mania/mixed states in bipolar disorder; however, they are associated with clinically significant adverse effects (AEs)., Methods: This post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and tolerability of the atypical antipsychotic cariprazine in the treatment of adult patients with acute manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. Data were taken from three 3-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trials of cariprazine 3-12mg/d. Patient subgroups categorized by modal daily dose (3-6mg/d; 9-12mg/d) were used to assess dose response., Results: The pooled safety population comprised 1065 patients (placebo=442; cariprazine 3-6mg/d=263; cariprazine 9-12mg/d=360). More cariprazine- than placebo-treated patients reported double-blind treatment-emergent AEs; the overall AE incidence was similar among cariprazine-dose groups. AEs reported in ≥5% of cariprazine patients overall with at least twice the incidence of placebo were akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms, restlessness, and vomiting. The incidence of SAEs was low and similar between the placebo- and cariprazine-treatment groups. Metabolic parameter changes were small and generally similar between cariprazine and placebo groups; mean increases in fasting glucose levels were greater with cariprazine (3-6mg/d=6.6mg/dL; 9-12mg/d=7.2mg/dL) than placebo (1.7mg/dL). Mean weight change was 0.54kg and 0.17kg for cariprazine and placebo, respectively; weight increase ≥7% was <3% in all treatment groups. Cariprazine was not associated with clinically meaningful changes in electrocardiogram parameters., Limitations: Post hoc analysis, flexible-dose design, short trial duration., Conclusion: Cariprazine was generally safe and well-tolerated in patients with manic/mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia can be severe enough to cause persistent impairment, effective treatment options are lacking. We aimed to assess the new generation antipsychotic cariprazine in adult patients with predominant negative symptoms., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, phase 3b trial, we enrolled adults aged 18-65 years with long-term (>2 year), stable schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms (>6 months) at 66 study centres (mainly hospitals and university clinics, with a small number of private practices) in 11 European countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by an interactive web response system to 26 weeks of monotherapy with fixed-dose oral cariprazine (3 mg, 4·5 mg [target dose], or 6 mg per day) or risperidone (3 mg, 4 mg [target dose], or 6 mg per day); previous medication was discontinued over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 26 or end of treatment on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale factor score for negative symptoms (PANSS-FSNS) analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population of patients who had follow-up assessments within 5 days after last receipt of study drugs with a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2012-005485-36., Findings: Between May 27, 2013, and Nov 17, 2014, 533 patients were screened and 461 (86%) patients were randomised to treatment (230 for cariprazine and 231 for risperidone); 460 were included in the safety population (one patient discontinued before study drug intake). 227 (99%) of 230 patients in the cariprazine group and 229 (99%) of 230 patients in the risperidone group were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (178 [77%] in each group completed 26 weeks of treatment). Mean daily doses were 4·2 mg (SD 0·6) for cariprazine and 3·8 mg (0·4) for risperidone. Treatment-emergent adverse events (eg, insomnia, akathisia, worsening of schizophrenia, headache, anxiety) were reported in 123 (54%) patients treated with cariprazine and 131 (57%) patients treated with risperidone. Use of cariprazine led to a greater least squares mean change in PANSS-FSNS from baseline to week 26 than did risperidone (-8·90 points for cariprazine vs -7·44 points for risperidone; least squares mean difference -1·46, 95% CI -2·39 to -0·53; p=0·0022; effect size 0·31). One patient in the risperidone group died of a cause regarded as unrelated to treatment., Interpretation: Our results support the efficacy of cariprazine in the treatment of predominant negative symptoms of schizophrenia., Funding: Gedeon Richter Plc., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Bipolar I disorder is a chronic disorder characterized by episodic recurrences of mania, depression, and mixed affective states interspersed with periods of full or partial remission; subsyndromal residual symptoms between episodes are common and disabling. Cariprazine, an atypical antipsychotic, is a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist with preferential binding to D3 receptors. Post-hoc analyses of pooled data from 3 positive trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of cariprazine 3-12 mg/d on the symptoms of mania in inpatients (18-65 years) with bipolar I disorder and a current manic episode. Analyses were based on the pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) population (placebo=429; cariprazine=608). Mean change from baseline to the end of treatment on individual Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) items was analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM); categorical symptom severity shifts were analysed using logistic regression. Statistically significant improvement in mean change was seen for cariprazine versus placebo on all 11 YMRS items (p<0.0001); significantly more cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients had mild/no symptoms at the end of treatment on 11 YMRS items (p<0.0001) and concurrently on the 4 YMRS core symptoms (irritability, speech, content, and disruptive-aggressive behaviour) (p<0.0001). Significantly more cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients shifted from a Moderate/Worse or Marked/Worse Symptoms categories to Mild/No Symptoms on all 11 (p<0.0001) and 9 of 11 YMRS items (p<0.05), respectively. Results suggest that cariprazine treatment improved mania across YMRS symptoms; a significant percentage of cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients had mild/no symptoms at the end of treatment., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.)

Healing was obtained in 21 fractures with delayed union or pseudarthrosis by stimulation of the bone with electromagnetic waves. The interest of this method lies in a number of factors: the apparatus Centicure is miniaturized and very easy to handle; the daily treatment is performed by the patient himself; and application may be split, allowing normal and even professional activity. The method requires no immobilization nor surgical electrode implantation, the cost of the treatment is low and the apparatus can be used for several patients. Bone healing was seen in 15 cases of the 19 reviewed after a brief treatment period. Stimulation by means of magnetic fields, on the other hand, has obvious drawbacks, including high costs.

In this study we tested the effect of vibrating electromagnetic waves on both arterial and varicose ulcers. The two transmitters we used were the diatrom and the fel, which differ in the energy transmitted and the means of application (direct contact electrode for the fel, distance transmission for the diatrom). Out of 17 cases treated we obtained 15 cures. This proportion of positive results encountered in traumatology and in dermatology for cases where the vascular factor played an important role, makes it possible to consider the application of vibrating electromagnetic waves as a valid therapy for ulcers.

A comparison was made between indoprofen (800 mg/day), naproxen (500 mg/day) and placebo in 30 patients with well defined osteoarthritis of the hip. Treatments were given for 10 days each, according to a double-blind, cross-over design. Objective and subjective criteria were adopted for evaluation of effectiveness. Special attention was paid to side effects. There was a marked difference between the active drugs and placebo. Indoprofen was significantly better than naproxen on many variables, and was, in most cases, preferred to the latter, by patients and investigator.