Search

Copyright of Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterraneos is the property of Taller de Estudios Internacionales Mediterraneos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Estudios Internacionales Mediterraneos is the property of Taller de Estudios Internacionales Mediterraneos and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

La evolución acelerada de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) ha intensificado el debate público sobre sus implicaciones sociales. En este contexto, la cobertura periodística de los avances tecnológicos desempeña un papel clave en la formación de la opinión pública. Como mediadora del debate público, la prensa tiene la responsabilidad de proporcionar una cobertura crítica y equilibrada de estos temas de interés. Este estudio analiza cómo los medios representan las preocupaciones éticas sobre los efectos sociales de la IA. A partir de un corpus de 912 artículos de 12 periódicos españoles, se identificaron los temas y voces que configuraron el debate durante un mes, cinco meses después del lanzamiento de ChatGPT. Los resultados revelan los principales discursos que organizan el debate público, destacando un predominio de la perspectiva tecnopesimista, que subraya los riesgos potenciales de la IA para la humanidad y la necesidad urgente de establecer estándares éticos. Además, se muestra que las grandes empresas tecnológicas han desempeñado un rol destacado en el debate, actuando no solo como protagonistas del desarrollo tecnológico, sino también como las principales voces que impulsan la discusión, en contraste con la limitada participación de actores políticos, gubernamentales y de la sociedad civil. Aunque no se observaron diferencias sistemáticas entre los diarios analizados, surgieron algunas diferencias de posicionamiento al comparar los medios tradicionales con los nativos digitales.

Copyright of Papeles del CEIC is the property of Centro de Estudios sobra la Identidad Colectiva, Facultas de Ciencias Sociales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Este estudio investiga cómo la reformulación de una noticia original en artículos periodísticos refleja los intereses editoriales de variados diarios españoles, particularmente en el contexto del debate sobre la Inteligencia Artificial (IA). Utilizando un artículo de The New York Times como caso de estudio, analizamos su uso subsiguiente en la redacción de otros artículos. La investigación busca comprender qué revela la transformación de un texto noticioso sobre la postura de los medios en el debate de la IA. Exploramos los mecanismos de reformulación empleados por la prensa, incluyendo la preeminencia de cierta información, la omisión de detalles, la adición de contenido, la emisión de juicios y la tergiversación de datos. Estos métodos ilustran cómo los medios se posicionan en el debate sobre los riesgos de la IA. Los hallazgos revelan diferencias notables en el enfoque y tratamiento del tema entre periódicos tradicionales y digitales.

Copyright of Politica y Sociedad is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodistico is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of CIRCULO de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion is the property of Universidad Complutense de Madrid and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

La opinión pública se construye, en gran medida, por el aporte que hacen los medios de comunicación al publicar los hechos relevantes y opiniones de diversos actores sociales sobre los temas de contingencia. La opinión se vehicula no solo en los géneros periodísticos de opinión –editoriales, columnas– sino también en las noticias, que transmiten los puntos de vista de periodistas acerca de los acontecimientos, así como las opiniones de actores sociales que acceden, directamente o a través de citas, al espacio público. Como una forma de conocer la orientación de la opinión en un debate público según la audiencia a la que se dirige, proponemos caracterizar el flujo de opinión en las noticias de dos diarios de una misma empresa. El flujo de opinión es entendido como el conjunto de puntos de vista emitidos sobre un mismo tema que circulan en los textos periodísticos. Elegimos los diarios El Mercurio y Las Últimas Noticias porque siendo de la misma empresa, El Mercurio S. A. P., están dirigidos a públicos diferentes: el primero dirigido a un público de clase alta y media-alta y el segundo a uno de clase baja y media-baja. Para delimitar el tema, elegimos el debate público generado por el cuestionamiento al sistema previsional chileno. Al respecto nos preguntamos: ¿Qué diferencias hay en el flujo de opinión presentado en las noticias de dos diarios con distintas audiencias pertenecientes a una misma empresa periodística frente al debate público sobre el sistema previsional? Es así que investigamos el flujo de opinión a través del análisis de cuatro niveles: cobertura, voces, problemáticas y tipos de encuadre que recibe la opinión. Los resultados nos muestran diferencias sistemáticas en el flujo de opinión que se ofrece a una y otra audiencia en los cuatro niveles estudiados.

In the irrigated areas of Mendoza province, located in the centralwest region of Argentina, trees play a central role in the construction of places and the definition of identity. The landscape, understood in a relational and historical sense, emerges as an interesting category for analyzing how material and discursive phenomena and dynamics shape environments that are considered characteristic of an identity. Based on a study of historical and current discourses and materialities regarding the formation of the forest landscape in the central-northern region of the province (currently known as the northern oasis), our objective is to analyze the role of these plants in the shaping and consolidation of distinctive environments, ways of experiencing these landscapes, and ethnic and provincial identities. The historical analysis is approached through a synthesis of archaeological and documentary data, which allows for the delineation and distinction of indigenous, colonial, and modern landscape formations. Current materialities are analyzed through agronomic studies, environmental reports produced by state agencies or provincial legislations, and own records. Discourses are examined through research in local media, web forums, and public debates. This article provides a synthesis and new insights on the topic, particularly by discussing various previously isolated sources. This holistic and historically informed analysis allows us to observe how narratives and materialities are intertwined in the unique construction of the forest landscape in Mendoza's irrigated areas, shaping a distinct environment, experience, and identity in the study region, impacting various fields of knowledge and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Prudentia Iuris is the property of Pontificia Universidad Catolica Argentina and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The objective of this article is to analyze the structure and evolution of public debate on drug policy in Brazil between 2003 and 2016. To do so we analyzed 306 articles in the newspaper Zero Hora. The analysis shows significant changes in the public debate on the "drug problem" in the country in the past decade. More specifically, it shows that public debate tends to be more heterogeneous, in terms of agents and framings, than what is expressed in the current drug policy. Identifying and analyzing this heterogeneity is important for understanding the controversies and positions in dispute concerning drug policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Resumo Neste artigo analisamos o caso Maurício, série de enunciações produzidas após o jogador de vôlei Maurício Souza comentar uma imagem em quadrinhos na qual o filho do Super-Homem beija outro rapaz. A partir da observação dos usos práticos das categorias ‘homofobia’ e ‘liberdade de expressão’, demonstramos como ideias concorrentes de democracia informam o debate, que descrevemos a partir da categoria coalizão. Conceituamos coalizões como estruturas comunicacionais que operam em contextos marcados por antagonismos, constituindo posições de aliados e inimigos. Por meio das coalizões chegamos às duas diferentes epistemes que conformam o debate: uma pluralista, organizada na língua da identidade e para a qual a democracia se valida pela inclusão dessas diferenças (anti-Maurício); a outra majoritarista e antipluralista (pró-Maurício), assentada em categorias universalistas, como nação e Deus. Trabalhamos com base em material coletado entre outubro de 2021 e janeiro de 2022, em redes sociais e portais de notícias.

The phenomenon of misinformation in the era of social networks has the spread of fake news as one of its pillars. The objective of this article is to identify patterns in the production of fake news released during the Covid-19 pandemic to justify the denialist policies adopted by the Brazilian government. The corpus consisted of 142 articles checked by the agencies Lupa e Fato ou Fake between May and October 2021. The exploratory research, of a qualitative and quantitative nature, used content analysis and deductive method. Two categories of fake news were identified: invention and adulteration; the latter being divided into four subcategories: distortion, decontextualization, fraud, false symmetry. Although 50% of the fake news was forged by primary invention processes, the analysis identifies that the other half was made up of distorted content that indicates a complex structure for financing production. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Sociología is the property of Federacion Espanola de Sociologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

It is possible that rhetoric, the ancient art of convincing through words, may be projected through the bias of political philosophy, reflecting on which regimes would best suit it. As for the democratic ones, there seems to be no doubt that they are its natural environment, but the theme generates questions regarding authoritarianism. Thinking of the extremes, the question arises: would fascism, despite all the barbarities physically perpetrated and all that it currently represents, reflected on a merely discursive level and outside the interpretative panorama of human rights, in general, be a rhetorical phenomenon, in the terms of realist rhetoric? This is the problem that the present article seeks to answer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

En este artículo propongo alimentar el debate en torno al proceso de divulgación de los resultados de investigación en ámbitos que forman parte de ese sustrato común en el que se construyen las causas ambientales. Mi presentación se va a concentrar en mostrar algunos aspectos referidos a la discusión de los resultados de investigación, la politización del debate en torno a los significados de esos hallazgos y sus implicancias para una alimentar una reflexión de largo aliento sobre el carácter público del trabajo sociológico en Argentina. El argumento central es que, dado el carácter público que asume la construcción de ciertos problemas de investigación, la presentación de los hallazgos se da en un contexto en el que el debate ya tiene conexiones con otros ámbitos de deliberación. En no pocas ocasiones es el público quien cuestiona el rol de las agencias estatales y las corporaciones en términos de la producción del conocimiento, abriendo un debate sobre el posicionamiento del investigador en relación a los saberes que están en juego. De este modo, al presentar los resultados se plantean debates en los que se hacen visibles las preguntas del público en torno a las implicancias políticas de las investigaciones y acerca del rol del conocimiento científico en la construcción de visiones y alternativas de mundos.

Este artículo pretende, tras reconocer la importancia de la perspectiva de Mouffe al subrayar que el conflicto es inherente a la sociedad, superar las limitaciones que su enfoque muestra al tratar la dualidad del conflicto y el consenso. Para ello, presenta la idea de que el trío medieval de verdad, bondad y belleza es un concepto-límite inalcanzable, pero necesario para legitimar el proceso político. Partiendo de esta perspectiva, es posible reconceptualizar el debate público: es necesario superar su esterilidad contemporánea, causada al imaginar la democracia como un mercado de ideas, donde no hay intercambio sino sólo competencia entre posiciones distintas y donde el factor determinante es la fuerza (sublimada en el número de votos). El escrito intenta ofrecer algunas formas alternativas de imaginar la democracia como un proceso continuo que respete el pluralismo y haga que el debate público sea constructivo.

Copyright of Pensamiento y Acción Multidisciplinaria is the property of Universidad Catolica del Maule. Escuela de Trabajo Social and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Derecho y Genoma Humano is the property of Dykinson SL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Literatura y Lingüística is the property of Universidad Catolica Cardenal Raul Silva Henriquez and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Tras constatar la relevancia de la opinión pública en el marco de la teoría democrática contemporánea, esta comunicación se aboca a la delimitación, la historización y la analítica de los fenómenos aludidos por el concepto. A resultas de este trabajo, se ofrece una definición cuadrangular de la opinión pública como campo problemático que incluye: la puja de intereses, el debate público, el sentido común y el discurso oficial.

Tras la crisis del salitre de 1919 en Chile, miles de obreros fueron albergados en Santiago por disposición del gobierno en turno. Este artículo explora las prácticas políticas que ejercieron estos obreros y analiza el debate público que se generó al respecto. El objetivo es mostrar que la presencia en la capital de los obreros cesantes, a quienes se les caracterizaba como agentes revolucionarios, acrecentó la tensión entre las distintas fuerzas políticas como la vieja oligarquía parlamentaria, el Partido Obrero Socialista y Arturo Alessandri. Para ello se consultaron y analizaron fuentes hemerográficas y documentos de la Dirección General del Trabajo.

Los discursos que circulan en los medios de comunicación son fundamentales para la construcción de la opinión pública, en la medida que informan sobre los hechos y opiniones relevantes de la vida social. En este sentido, la libre circulación de la opinión es esencial en una democracia. En esta investigación describimos el flujo de opinión sobre un tema de interés público en diversos géneros periodísticos para comprender su contribución al debate público. Entendemos por flujo de opinión el conjunto de puntos de vista que circulan en el espacio público en torno a un mismo tópico. A diario, la prensa publica las opiniones de periodistas, expertos, académicos, políticos u otros actores sociales que escriben directamente en los diarios o son citados por otros, accediendo de esa forma al espacio público. Un tema sensible para la opinión pública chilena ha sido el cuestionamiento al sistema previsional que, por su complejidad y amplitud, nos ofrece una buena oportunidad para el estudio de la participación de la prensa en el debate público. La prensa matutina nacional chilena reúne a 4 diarios que tienen circulación en papel: El Mercurio, La Tercera, Las Últimas Noticias y La Cuarta. Para cumplir nuestro objetivo, trabajamos sobre un corpus de 244 textos de diversos géneros periodísticos recolectado durante 30 días, circunscritos a dos eventos de protesta contra el sistema de pensiones que marcaron la agenda social y mediática. Los resultados nos muestran una completa descripción del flujo de opinión de los diarios frente a este tema, relevando las voces que fueron representadas en el debate y los temas que fueron problematizados por género. Asimismo, se puede apreciar el sesgo sistemático de los diarios en su contribución al debate público frente a este tema.

Copyright of Veritas is the property of EDIPUCRS - Editora Universitaria da PUCRS and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Polis (07176554) is the property of Polis - Revista Academica Universidad Bolivariana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Policy & Internet is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista CESUMAR: Ciências Humanas e Sociais Aplicadas is the property of Revista Cesumar - Ciencias Humanas e Sociais Aplicadas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista SAAP is the property of Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Politico and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This paper discusses the phenomenon of radicalization into online conversation, especially through social network sites. Then, we analyze comments posted by Facebook users on Brazilian newspapers' fan pages on that social medium. 628,057 comments mentioning at least one of the main candidates during the campaign were classified. The article discusses some aspects of radicalization, so it analyzes two specific variables: reflexivity and form of comments. Results show that social media, even though they open a space for dialog, give place to debates in which participants prioritize criticism or praise for candidates, and they basically lead to persuasion and radicalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía is the property of Centro de Investigaciones Filosoficas and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The process of making an audience for television involves also the representations and the discourses published about such audience. Trying to understand which ideas prevailed about the audience during the dictatorship led by Salazar, this paper examines the early period of Portuguese television. It draws on the coeval press dedicated to television, from which it gathered discourses from diverse origins: the official milieu; TV professionals; newspapers journalists; intellectual elites; and members of the public which for a while were quite interventive. Two different conceptions compete about the television audience and a negotiation process takes place within the dictatorial context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper aims at discussing the role of events in promoting debates on issues of public interest. The goal is to understand whether, and how, moral discussions are triggered by events that mobilize public attention, widely reported because they involve public figures. To explore these issues, we analysed two events related to domestic violence and implementation of Maria da Penha Law, from news published in the newspapers Folha de S.Paulo and O Globo: (1) aggression involving the actor Dado Dolabella and actress Luana Piovani and (2) the disappearance/ murder of Eliza Samúdio. We used the notion of individuation of the event to introduce them and found that these events reveal important catalysts for moral debates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interactive experiences online have been stimulating the development of public debate. Facebook, for example, has attracted citizens and institutions, as well as communication enterprises that see in this tool an opportunity for greater interaction with an audience. This paper identifies the characteristics of the debate among audiences in the official Facebook pages of the three main Brazilian newspapers (Folha de S.Paulo, O Estado de S.Paulo e O Globo) on the 2014 presidential election. Therefore, we have observed in 610.660 comments: 1) the debate's intensity over time; 2) the commentator's position (reciprocity); 3) justification; and 4) reflexivity. Among our main findings, one might highlight the predominance of monologues and the low level of justification. However, Facebook can be considered a space for persuasion, which prevailed in the comments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sosteniendo la hipótesis de que los métodos y técnicas utilizadas para el estudio de los conceptos de interés sociológico tienen cierta influencia en la definición de los mismos, este artículo plantea una reflexión sobre las posibilidades e implicaciones de dispositivos diferentes a las encuestas para la investigación de la opinión pública. La aproximación a este enfoque se realizará desde dos argumentaciones: por un lado, sosteniendo la naturaleza cualitativa y discursiva de la opinión pública y, por otro, mostrando la dificultad de los sondeos para ser percibidos colectivamente como un medio confiable e interesante para expresar y registrar puntos de vista sobre los asuntos públicos. La CNDP (Comisión Nacional de Debate Público) es una institución pública francesa creada para animar debates nacionales, regionales o locales sobre grandes operaciones públicas. Teniendo en cuenta que la encuesta deliberativa ha sido probablemente el dispositivo que, con mayor grado de sistematización, ha intentado implementar las premisas de la democracia deliberativa/participativa, este artículo explorará las posibilidades de una forma más amplia de concebir la “opinión pública”, desde el análisis de las dinámicas generadas por el dispositivo institucional del Debate Público.

O tema “meio ambiente” entrou no debate público a partir do momento em que os problemas causados pelas ações do homem na natureza passaram a ser objeto de eventos e conferências. É quando surgem movimentos ambientalistas com o objetivo de defender a causa. Com isso, o assunto também passou a ser recorrente na mídia, principalmente a partir do final do século XX, e ser de interesse público na medida em que se percebeu sua importância na sociedade. Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar de que forma o assunto meio ambiente é abordado pelo jornal Folha de São Paulo entre 1992 e 2008, na tentativa de observar a posição da mídia no debate público a respeito do tema.

Se revisa el proceso mediante el cual el debate público se convirtió en un principio de legitimación clave dentro de la cultura política mexicana de la primera década de vida independiente. El análisis del debate se acota al tema masónico, pues en torno a él se discutieron algunos de los conceptos fundamentales del nuevo sistema político.This article reviews the process whereby public debate became a key principle of legitimization within Mexican political culture during the first decade of independent life. Analysis of the debate is restricted to masonry, since this constituted the core of the discussion of some of the main concepts of the new political system.

The aim of this communication is to discuss the possible contributions that brazilian television may offer to public debate and to the construction of collective identities beyond what is traditionally brodcasted by journalism. Our goal is to point out and discuss that other products and media types may well adress political issues and promote reflections and discussions about them, as well as topics of collective interest and nature, by presenting new topics, focuses and forms of exchange, including those of people who suffer social exclusion and lack of recognition. Based on analysed material, this text presents an empiric example – the short series City of men ( Cidade dos Homens ), exhibited by TV Globo since 2002.