Search

Purpose: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an under-recognized genetic cardiac disorder affecting the muscles and contractility of the heart, which in turn can result in heart failure symptoms, arrhythmia, and sudden cardiac death. Previously, pharmacotherapy options for HCM were not disease-specific, often poorly tolerated, and overall inadequate for optimal management. This narrative review discusses the pharmacology of the novel drug mavacamten, the clinical trials supporting its use, and considerations for its use in clinical practice., Methods: PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for the key words mavacamten and Camzyos to identify currently active clinical trials and clinical trials published between January 2015 and March 2023. Data from EXPLORER-HCM were included, as EXPLORER-HCM led to approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of the use of mavacamten, along with data from VALOR-HCM, which provided additional evidence for use. Publications that were not randomized, controlled trials were not included in this review., Findings: The findings from this review suggest that mavacamten is an effective treatment for patients with persistently symptomatic obstructive HCM and may decrease the need for septal reduction therapy. Mavacamten use was associated with improved exercise capacity, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and New York Heart Association functional class, and with a decreased frequency of septal reduction therapy., Implications: HCM is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, independent of other disease states. Mavacamten is a novel treatment option for patients with HCM and offers an additional option for patients with persistent symptoms who previously had limited treatment options. The use of mavacamten in patients with obstructive HCM may improve exercise capacity, and decrease symptoms and the need for septal reduction therapy. There is potential for mavacamten to be indicated for use in patients with nonobstructive HCM in the future, pending findings from Phase III trials in this population., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

What Is Known and Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between early β-blocker continuation and major inpatient events in patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD)., Methods: This single centre, retrospective, investigational review board approved cohort study evaluated patients admitted for a primary diagnosis of AECOPD. Patients were evaluated based on early continuation of a β-blocker whether a β-blocker was initiated within 24 hours of admission and continued for at least 72 hours. Patients with AECOPD who did not receive β-blockers were assigned to the control group. Major inpatient events were a composite outcome composed of arrhythmias, myocardial infarction (MI) and death. Safety data were collected on the incidences of bradycardia, bronchospasms and hypotension., Results and Discussion: Of the 96 patients admitted for AECOPD, fifty-five patients were included in the early β-blocker group and forty-one patients in the control group. Early β-blocker utilization was associated with a significantly lower rate of major inpatient events compared with the control group (40% vs 80.5%; P < 0.001). Arrhythmias were significantly less common in the early β-blocker group (30.9% vs 65.9%; P = 0.001); however, there were no significant differences in the rates of MI (9.1% vs 14.6%; P = 0.54), death (0 vs 0) or safety outcomes between groups., What Is New and Conclusion: β-blocker therapy could result in a paradigm shift in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients from a true cardiopulmonary approach. This retrospective cohort study demonstrated early β-blocker continuation in patients admitted for an AECOPD was associated with less major inpatient events, primarily arrhythmias., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Risk stratification for stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation is a vital step in identifying whether antithrombotic therapy is indicated for stroke prevention in this common arrhythmia., Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine adherence to guideline-directed antithrombotic therapy based on Congestive Heart Failure (1 point), Hypertension (1 point), Age (≥75 years old is 2 points and 65-74 is 1 point), Diabetes (1 point), prior Stroke (2 points), Vascular Disease (1 point), and Sex Category (1 point if female; CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc) score in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on hospital discharge., Methods: A total of 293 patients discharged from this academic medical center with a history of atrial fibrillation from June 2014 to June 2016 were enrolled. Demographic data and indicators for antithrombotic therapy based on the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score were recorded, and factors that affected adherence to guideline-directed therapy, such as bleeding risk, falls, and alcohol abuse, were collected and analyzed., Results: At hospital discharge, 63% of patients with AF were on appropriate antithrombotic therapy, 50% with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2. The odds ratio of appropriate therapy in patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥2 was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-1.30; P = .18). When chart documentation for reasons to withhold anticoagulation was considered as appropriate therapy, 81% of patients with AF were discharged on appropriate antithrombotic therapy with an odds ratio of 1.57 (95% CI: 1.26 -1.96, P < .0001), with bleeding and falls risk as the most common reasons to withhold anticoagulation., Conclusion: Based on risk stratification of stroke through the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, the majority of patients with AF were discharged from the hospital on appropriate antithrombotic therapy. Withholding anticoagulation due to falls risk should be reconsidered as a result of the known benefits of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Background: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication arising after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and valve replacement or repair surgeries. POAF has been associated with increased mortality, morbidity and cost., Methods: The study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of POAF following CABG, valve or combination surgeries when perioperative ranolazine (1,000 mg preoperatively, then 1,000 mg twice daily for 7 days or until discharge) was or was not added to standard therapy., Results: A total of 205 patients were evaluated for POAF after CABG, valve or combination surgeries. POAF occurred less frequently in the ranolazine group compared with the non-ranolazine group in unmatched analysis (10.1 vs. 41.9 %, p < 0.0001). After adjusting for potential sources of bias through propensity-score matched-pair analysis and conditional logistic regression, ranolazine was an independent predictor of preventing POAF (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in bradycardia, new renal failure or neurological events between the two groups. Early, symptomatic hypotension occurred more frequently in the ranolazine group (p = 0.0004) although this difference did not persist after 72 h. No significant difference was found in the length of stay in the intensive care unit following cardiac surgery. While a significant difference was found in the hospital readmission rate for a cardiac cause within 30 days in the unmatched analysis (p = 0.046), this difference was nonexistent after matching (p = 0.39). No difference was found in 30-day cardiovascular mortality., Conclusion: Adding ranolazine to standard therapy was independently associated with a significant decrease in POAF development after CABG, valve or combination surgeries.

Background: Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is an inactivated concentrate of factors II, IX, and X, with variable amounts of factor VII. Guidelines recommend the use of PCC in the setting of life-threatening bleeds, but little is known on the most effective dosing strategies and how the presenting international normalized ratio affects response to therapy., Objectives: This review aims to highlight available data on monitoring techniques, address shortcomings of currently available data, the reversal of life-threatening and critical bleeds with PCC, and how this product compares to other therapeutic options used in critically ill patients., Discussion: PCC has been identified as a potential therapy for critically bleeding patients, but patient-specific factors, product availability, and current data should weigh the decision to use it. Most data exist regarding patients experiencing vitamin K antagonist-induced bleeding, more specifically, those with intracranial hemorrhage. PCC has also been studied in trauma-induced hemorrhage; however, it remains controversial, as its potential benefits have the abilities to become flaws in this setting., Conclusion: Health care professionals must remain aware of the differences in products and interpret how three- versus four-factor products may affect patients, and interpret literature accordingly. The clinician must be cognizant of how to progress when treating a bleeding patient, propose a supported dosing scheme, and address the need for appropriate factor VII supplementation. At this point, PCC cannot be recommended for first-line therapy in patients with traumatic hemorrhage, and should be reserved for refractory bleeding until more data are available., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)