Search

Problem LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and all sexual and gender minorities) people have unique health care needs related to their sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex development. However, medical education has historically excluded LGBTQIA + health-related content in formal curricula. It is common for medical students to interact with diverse patient populations through clinical rotations; however, access to and knowledge about LGBTQIA + patients is inconsistently prioritized in medical schools. This is especially true for LGBTQIA + patients with intersecting historically marginalized identities, such as people of color and people with disabilities. Learning from and listening to medically underserved community members can help both medical students and educators better understand the unique health needs of these communities, and address implicit biases to improve health care and outcomes for their patients. Intervention : To address the lack of LGBTQIA + health-related content in medical education and improve access to and knowledge about LGBTQIA + patients, LGBTQIA + community members' perspectives and lived experiences were integrated into undergraduate medical education via four primary methods: Community Advisory Groups, community panel events, standardized patients, and community member interviews. Context : LGBTQIA + community members' perspectives and lived experiences were integrated into medical education at Harvard Medical School (HMS) as part of the HMS Sexual and Gender Minority Health Equity Initiative. Impact : LGBTQIA + community members' perspectives and lived experiences were successfully integrated into multiple aspects of medical education at HMS. During this process, we navigated challenges in the following areas that can inform similar efforts at other institutions: representation of diverse identities and experiences, meeting and scheduling logistics, structural barriers in institutional processes, and implementation of community member recommendations. Lessons Learned : Based on our experiences, we offer recommendations for integrating LGBTQIA + community members' perspectives into medical education. Engaging community members and integrating their perspectives into medical education will better enable medical educators at all institutions to teach students about the health care needs of LGBTQIA + communities, and better prepare medical students to provide affirming and effective care to their future patients, particularly those who are LGBTQIA+.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) 2013 decision to lower recommended Ambien dosing for women has been widely cited as a hallmark example of the importance of sex differences in biomedicine. Using regulatory documents, scientific publications, and media coverage, this article analyzes the making of this highly influential and mobile 'sex-difference fact'. As we show, the FDA's decision was a contingent outcome of the drug approval process. Attending to how a contested sex-difference fact came to anchor elite women's health advocacy, this article excavates the role of regulatory processes, advocacy groups, and the media in producing perceptions of scientific agreement while foreclosing ongoing debate, ultimately enabling the stabilization of a binary, biological sex-difference fact and the distancing of this fact from its conditions of construction.