Search

Human leukocyte antigen alloimmunization is caused by exposure to HLA antigens through transfusion, pregnancy, or transplant. Our study objective was to present the rate of positivity of anti-HLA antibody considering the effects of a single sensitization event in kidney transplant candidates at our center.Our study reviewed 606 kidney transplant candidates. Patient sera were analyzed using Luminex xMAP technology. Panel reactive antibody positivity rates and antibody strengths in patients were analyzed according to a single sensitization event.Our findings showed 246 patients (40.6%) with a panel reactive antibody0, of which 97 (39.4%) were sensitized from a single event, 119 (48.4%) were sensitized by multiple events, and 30 (12.2%) had no known sensitizing event. Considering patients sensitized by a single event with a panel reactive antibody0, we found that 25.8% had received transplant only, 49.5% had previous pregnancy only, and 24.7% had received transfusion only. The strength of antibodies was significantly higher in patients with previous transplant procedures than in those with transfusion for HLA-A (P.01), HLA-B (P.05), HLA-C (P.05), HLA-DR (P.001), HLA-DQ (P.05), and HLA-DP (P.05). Similarly, we observed significantly higher median fluorescence intensity values for HLA-A, -DR, -DQ, and -DP loci in patients with a previous transplant procedure versus pregnancy. The strength of antibodies against HLA-DR was significantly higher in patients with a previous pregnancy compared with those with transfusion (P.01).This study documents the profile of HLA alloimmunization in kidney transplant candidates. In particular, transplant procedures appear to have a greater immunologic impact, followed by pregnancy and transfusion. Our data confirm and are in accordance with those of several studies in which the sensitization events were associated with higher prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies.

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the therapy of choice for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The ESRD population is aging and so are patients waiting for KT. New strategies have been made for increasing the donor and recipient pools, and as a consequence kidneys from older donors or donors with significant comorbidities, the so-called “expanded criteria donor” (ECD) kidneys, are used for transplantation. Although good outcomes have been achieved from ECD, several issues are still waiting for clarification and need to be discussed. The concept of age matching is accepted as a method to ameliorate utilization of these allografts, but an optimal and widely accepted strategy is still not defined. The development of machine perfusion and the dual kidney transplantation are techniques which further improve the outcome of transplants from ECD, but the described experiences are scarce or coming from small single institutional reports. Also due to age-related immune dysfunction and associated comorbidities, the elderly recipients are more susceptible to immunosuppression related complications (e.g., infections and malignancy), although a widely accepted and validated immunosuppressive regimen is still lacking. In this paper, we review the issues related to KT employing allografts from marginal donors with a particular interest for the elderly patients.

The lack of a precise stratification algorithm for predicting patients at high risk of graft rejection challenges the current solid organ transplantation (SOT) clinical setting. In fact, the established biomarkers for transplantation outcomes are unable to accurately predict the onset time and severity of graft rejection (acute or chronic) as well as the individual response to immunosuppressive drugs. Thus, identifying novel molecular pathways underlying early immunological responses which can damage transplant integrity is needed to reach precision medicine and personalized therapy of SOT. Direct epigenetic-sensitive mechanisms, mainly DNA methylation and histone modifications, may play a relevant role for immune activation and long-term effects (e.g., activation of fibrotic processes) which may be translated in new non-invasive biomarkers and drug targets. In particular, the measure of DNA methylation by using the blood-based ?epigenetic clock? system may be an added value to the donor eligibility criteria providing an estimation of the heart biological age as well as a predictive biomarkers. Besides, monitoring of DNA methylation changes may aid to predict acute vs chronic graft damage in kidney transplantation (KT) patients. For example, hypermethylation of genes belonging to the Notch and Wnt pathways showed a higher predictive value for chronic injury occurring at 12 months post-KT with respect to established clinical parameters. Detecting higher circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments carrying hepatocyte-specific unmethylated loci in the inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 (ITIH4), insulin like growth factor 2 receptor (IGF2R), and vitronectin (VTN) genes may be useful to predict acute graft injury after liver transplantation (LT) in serum samples. Furthermore, hypomethylation in the forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) gene may serve as a marker of infiltrating natural Treg percentage in the graft providing the ability to predict acute rejection events after heart transplantation (HTx). We aim to update on the possible clinical relevance of DNA methylation changes regulating immune-related pathways underlying acute or chronic graft rejection in KT, LT, and HTx which might be useful to prevent, monitor, and treat solid organ rejection at personalized level. ? 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the treatment of choice for patients with tumor characteristics within the Milan criteria associated with Child B or C cirrhosis. LT provides the best cure for both the tumor and the cirrhosis. There have been several emerging reports that new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after transplantation (NODAT) is one of the most negative predictive factors for low survival rate and related co-morbidities. Little is known about the onset of NODM in post-transplant patients and, overall, whether the pathogenesis of NODM differs from that known for the general population. Principally, it is still unknown whether NODAT is related to the primary hepatic disease, the surgical procedures, immunosuppressive treatments, or is it due to the donor liver. This review will focus on the identification of factors, in the setting of LT, which may lead to the development of NODM. Early prevention of these factors may abate the incidence of NODM and positively impact survival rate, and thus ameliorate the worsening of cardiovascular risk factors which usually occur after LT.