Search

Background: The mainstay of treatment for early-stage follicular lymphoma is local radiotherapy, with a possible role for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb). We aimed to evaluate the effect of these treatments using a measurable residual disease (MRD)-driven approach., Methods: This prospective, multicentre, phase 2 trial was conducted at 27 centres of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) in Italy. Eligible participants were adults (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (stage I or II; grade I-IIIa). Patients were initially treated with 24 Gy involved-field radiotherapy over 12 days; those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy or during follow-up received eight intravenous doses (1000 mg per dose; one dose per week) of the anti-CD20 mAb ofatumumab. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were MRD-positive after involved-field radiotherapy and became MRD-negative after ofatumumab treatment. Patients were included in the primary endpoint analysis population if they were positive for BCL2::IGH rearrangement at enrolment in peripheral blood or bone marrow samples. MRD positivity was defined as the persistence of BCL2::IGH rearrangement in peripheral blood or bone marrow, assessed centrally by laboratories of the FIL MRD Network. The trial was registered with EudraCT, 2012-001676-11., Findings: Between May 2, 2015, and June 1, 2018, we enrolled 110 participants, of whom 106 (96%) were eligible and received involved-field radiotherapy. Of these, 105 (99%) were White, one (1%) was Black, 50 (47%) were male, and 56 (53%) were female. Of 105 participants in whom BCL2::IGH status was evaluable, 32 (30%) had a detectable BCL2::IGH rearrangement at baseline. After radiotherapy, 12 (40%) of 30 patients reached MRD-negative status, which was long-lasting (at least 36 or 42 months) in three (25%). In those who were MRD-positive after radiotherapy, ofatumumab induced MRD-negativity in 23 (92%; 95% CI 74-99) of 25 evaluable patients. After a median follow-up of 46·1 months (IQR 42·8-50·8), 14 (61%) of these 23 patients remain in complete response and are MRD-negative. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were infusion-related reactions, observed in four patients., Interpretation: Local radiotherapy is frequently not associated with the eradication of follicular lymphoma. An MRD-driven, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody consolidation enables molecular remission to be reached in almost all patients and is associated with a reduced incidence of relapse over time. A clinical advantage of an MRD-driven consolidation is therefore suggested., Funding: AIRC Foundation for Cancer Research in Italy, Novartis International, and GlaxoSmithKline., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AP reports support for the study from Novartis and AIRC 5 × 1000; payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and BeiGene; payment for expert testimony from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Roche; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Pfizer, and AbbVie; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. SL reports payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Roche, BeiGene, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Kite Pharma; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Roche and BeiGene; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Roche, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Sobi, and Incyte. GG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson and payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Incyte, Lilly, Johnson & Johnson, and Hikma Pharmaceuticals. PC received consulting fees from AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, BeiGene, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead/Kite, GSK, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals and payment for lectures from AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sobi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals. LA received consulting fees from Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Verastem Oncology, Incyte, EUSA Pharma, Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite/Gilead, ADC Therapeutics, and Novartis and payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from EUSA Pharma and Novartis. ML received grants or contracts from Roche, BeiGene, ADC Therapeutics, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees and/or payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, ADC Therapeutics, Sobi, BeiGene, Bristol Myers Squibb, EUSA Pharma, Gilead/Kite, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharma, Lilly, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Ellipses Pharma, GSK, and Istituto Gentili. IDG received payment or honoraria for lectures or presentations from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and AstraZeneca; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche, and AstraZeneca; and support for participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The GIMEMA phase II LLC1518 VERITAS trial investigated the efficacy and safety of front-line, fixed-duration venetoclax and rituximab (VenR) in combination in young (≤65 years), fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unmutated IGHV and/or TP53 disruption. Treatment consisted of the venetoclax ramp-up, six monthly courses of the VenR combination, followed by six monthly courses of venetoclax as a single agent. A centralized assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) was performed by allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction assay on the peripheral blood and bone marrow at the end of treatment (EOT) and during the follow-up. The primary endpoint was the complete remission rate at the EOT. Seventy-five patients were enrolled; the median age was 54 years (range, 38-65), 96% had unmutated IGHV, 12% had TP53 disruption, and 4% had mutated IGHV with TP53 disruption. The overall response rate at the EOT was 94.7%, with a complete remission rate of 76%. MRD was undetectable in the peripheral blood of 69.3% of patients and in the bone marrow of 58.7% of patients. The 12-month MRD-free survival in the 52 patients with undetectable MRD in the peripheral blood at the EOT was 73.1%. After a median follow-up of 20.8 months, no cases of disease progression were observed. Three patients had died, two due to COVID-19 and one due to tumor lysis syndrome. The first report of the VERITAS study shows that front-line VenR was associated with a high rate of complete remissions and durable response with undetectable MRD in young patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and unfavorable genetic characteristics. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03455517.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has become the most investigated analyte in blood. It is shed from the tumor into the circulation and represents a subset of the total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) pool released into the peripheral blood. In order to define if ctDNA could represent a useful tool to monitor hematologic malignancies, we analyzed 81 plasma samples from patients affected by different diseases. The results showed that: (i) the comparison between two different extraction methods Qiagen (Hilden, Germany) and Promega (Madison, WI) showed no significant differences in cfDNA yield, though the first recovered higher amounts of larger DNA fragments; (ii) cfDNA concentrations showed a notable inter-patient variability and differed among diseases: acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic myeloid leukemia released higher amounts of cfDNA than chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma released higher cfDNA quantities than localized and advanced follicular lymphoma; (iii) focusing on the tumor fraction of cfDNA, the quantity of ctDNA released was insufficient for an adequate target quantification for minimal residual disease monitoring; (iv) an amplification system proved to be free of analytical biases and efficient in increasing ctDNA amounts at diagnosis and in follow-up samples as shown by droplet digital PCR target quantification. The protocol has been validated by quality control rounds involving external laboratories. To conclusively document the feasibility of a ctDNA-based monitoring of patients with hematologic malignancies, more post-treatment samples need to be evaluated. This will open new possibilities for ctDNA use in the clinical practice., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation has resulted in a fundamental instrument to guide patient management in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). From a methodological standpoint, MRD is defined as any approach aimed at detecting and possibly quantifying residual neoplastic cells beyond the sensitivity level of cytomorphology. The molecular methods to study MRD in ALL are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based approaches and are the most standardized techniques. However, there are some limitations, and emerging technologies, such as digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS), seem to have advantages that could improve MRD analysis in ALL patients. Furthermore, other blood components, namely cell-free DNA (cfDNA), appear promising and are also being investigated for their potential role in monitoring tumor burden and response to treatment in hematologic malignancies. Based on the review of the literature and on our own data, we hereby discuss how emerging molecular technologies are helping to refine the molecular monitoring of MRD in ALL and may help to overcome some of the limitations of standard approaches, providing a benefit for the care of patients.

Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) is an implementation of conventional PCR, with the potential of overcoming some limitations of real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). To evaluate if ddPCR may improve the quantification of disease levels and refine patients' risk stratification, 116 samples at four time points from 44 (35 B-lineage and 9 T-lineage) adult Philadelphia-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL1913 protocol were analyzed by RQ-PCR and ddPCR. A concordance rate between RQ-PCR and ddPCR of 79% (P < 0.0001) was observed; discordances were identified in 21% of samples, with the majority being RQ-PCR-negative (NEG) or positive not quantifiable (PNQ). ddPCR significantly reduced the proportion of PNQ samples-2.6% versus 14% (P = 0.003)-and allowed disease quantifiability in 6.6% of RQ-PCR-NEG, increasing minimal residual disease quantification in 14% of samples. Forty-seven samples were also investigated by next-generation sequencing, which confirmed the ddPCR results in samples classified as RQ-PCR-PNQ or NEG. By reclassifying samples on the basis of the ddPCR results, a better event-free survival stratification of patients was observed compared to RQ-PCR; indeed, ddPCR captured more true-quantifiable samples, with five relapses occurring in three patients who resulted RQ-PCR-PNQ/NEG but proved ddPCR positive quantifiable. At variance, no relapses were recorded in patients whose follow-up samples were RQ-PCR-PNQ but reclassified as ddPCR-NEG. A broader application of ddPCR in acute lymphoblastic leukemia clinical trials will help to improve patients' stratification., (Copyright © 2022 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph+ ALL), minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most relevant prognostic factor. Currently, its evaluation is based on quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR). Digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was successfully applied to several haematological malignancies. We analyzed 98 samples from 40 Ph+ ALL cases, the majority enrolled in the GIMEMA LAL2116 trial: 10 diagnostic samples and 88 follow-up samples, mostly focusing on positive non-quantifiable (PNQ) or negative samples by Q-RT-PCR to investigate the value of ddPCR for MRD monitoring. DdPCR BCR/ABL1 assay showed good sensitivity and accuracy to detect low levels of transcripts, with a high rate of reproducibility. The analysis of PNQ or negative cases by Q-RT-PCR revealed that ddPCR increased the proportion of quantifiable samples (p < 0.0001). Indeed, 29/54 PNQ samples (53.7%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR, whereas 13 (24.1%) were confirmed as PNQ by ddPCR and 12 (22.2%) proved negative. Among 24 Q-RT-PCR-negative samples, 13 (54.1%) were confirmed negative, four (16.7%) resulted PNQ and seven (29.2%) proved positive and quantifiable by ddPCR. Four of 5 patients, evaluated at different time points, who were negative by Q-RT-PCR and positive by ddPCR experienced a relapse. DdPCR appears useful for MRD monitoring in adult Ph+ ALL., (© 2021 The Authors. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is the most powerful prognostic factor in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) represents the gold standard for molecular MRD assessment and risk-based stratification of front-line treatment. In the protocols of the Italian Association of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (AIEOP) and the Berlin-Frankfurth-Munschen (BFM) group AIEOP-BFM ALL2009 and ALL2017, B-lineage ALL patients with high RQ-PCR-MRD at day+33 and positive at day+78 are defined slow early responders (SERs). Based on results of the AIEOP-BFM ALL2000 study, these patients are treated as high-risk also when positive MRD signal at day +78 is below the lower limit of quantification of RQ-PCR ("positive not-quantifiable," POS-NQ). To assess whether droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) could improve patients' risk definition, we analyzed MRD in 209 pediatric B-lineage ALL cases classified by RQ-PCR as POS-NQ and/or negative (NEG) at days +33 and/or +78 in the AIEOP-BFM ALL2000 trial. ddPCR MRD analysis was performed on 45 samples collected at day +78 from SER patients, who had RQ-PCR MRD ≥ 5.0 × 10 -4 at day+33 and POS-NQ at day+78 and were treated as medium risk (MR). The analysis identified 13 of 45 positive quantifiable cases. Most relapses occurred in this patients' subgroup, while ddPCR NEG or ddPCR-POS-NQ patients had a significantly better outcome ( P < 0.001). Overall, in 112 MR cases and 52 standard-risk patients, MRD negativity and POS-NQ were confirmed by the ddPCR analysis except for a minority of cases, for whom no differences in outcome were registered. These data indicate that ddPCR is more accurate than RQ-PCR in the measurement of MRD, particularly in late follow-up time points, and may thus allow improving patients' stratification in ALL protocols., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Hematology Association.)

Background: Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a very rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma caused by human herpesvirus-8 (HHV8) that grows in liquid phase within body cavities. The diagnosis of PEL is based on cytology but requires confirmatory ancillary tests. PEL occurs mainly in association with HIV infection. This study describes 9 cases of PEL in HIV-negative patients and compares their characteristics with 10 HIV-associated cases of PEL diagnosed at a single institution in Italy between 1995 and 2019., Methods: Clinical records were reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, laboratory abnormalities, and outcome. PEL samples were evaluated for cytomorphology, immunophenotype, immunoglobulin (IG)/T cell receptor (TR) rearrangements, and HHV8 and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral loads in effusion supernatants., Results: HIV-unrelated PEL occurred in 8 elderly patients (7 men, 1 woman) and 1 young adult with primary antibody deficiency. Cytology revealed HHV8-positive lymphoma cells lacking B/T cell antigens and exhibiting 2 cell patterns (polymorphous or monotonous). IG was clonally rearranged in all cases; aberrant TRG occurred in 2 cases. Effusion supernatants had more than 10 6 HHV8 DNA copies per mL and variable loads of EBV DNA. Compared with HIV-associated PEL, the HIV-negative cohort was characterized by older age, less frequent association with Kaposi sarcoma and/or multicentric Castleman disease, comparable but less abnormal laboratory parameters, and a nonsignificant survival benefit. PEL cases with low apoptosis were associated with better prognosis., Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, our case series of HIV-unrelated PEL is the largest thus far, expands the spectrum of cytological findings, and supports the need for a multidisciplinary approach in the diagnostic workup., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment is of high clinical relevance in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In mature B-cell malignancies, the presence of somatic hypermutations (SHM) in Variable-Diversity-Joining Heavy chain (VDJH) rearrangements leads to frequent mismatches between primers, probes, and the target, thus impairing tumor cells quantification. Alternative targets, such as immunoglobulin kappa-deleting-element (IGK-Kde) rearrangements, might be suitable for MRD detection. We aimed at evaluating the applicability of IGK-Kde rearrangements for MRD quantification in MCL patients by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR)/digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR). IGK screening was performed on bone marrow samples from two cohorts: the first from Turin (22 patients enrolled in the FIL-MCL0208 trial, NCT02354313) and the second from Rome (15 patients). IGK-Kde rearrangements were found in 76% (28/37) of cases, representing the sole molecular marker in 73% (8/11) of IGH-BCL1/IGH negative cases. MRD RQ-PCR monitoring was possible in 57% (16/28) of cases, showing a 100% concordance with the conventional targets. However, the frequent background amplification affected the sensitivity of the assay, that was lower in MCL compared to acute lymphoblastic leukemia and in line with multiple myeloma published results. ddPCR had a good concordance with RQ-PCR and it might help to identify false positive/negative results. From a clinical perspective, we suggest that IGK-Kde can be a candidate target for MRD monitoring and deserves a validation of its predictive value in prospective MCL series., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Since 2000, we have investigated 67 consecutive patients with stage I/II follicular lymphoma (FL) for the presence of BCL2/IGH rearrangements by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). All patients were treated with involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) (24-30 Gy). From 2005, patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) after IF-RT received rituximab (R) (375 mg/m 2 , 4 weekly administrations). The median follow-up is 82 months (17-196). At diagnosis, 72% of patients were BCL2/IGH+. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better in patients with undetectable/low levels (<10 -5 ) of circulating BCL2/IGH+ cells at diagnosis and in those who were persistently MRD- during follow-up (P = 0·0038). IF-RT induced an MRD- status in 50% of cases; 16/19 (84%) MRD+ patients after IF-RT became MRD- after R treatment. A significantly longer PFS was observed in MRD+ patients treated with R compared to untreated MRD+ patients (P = 0·049). In early stage FL, both circulating levels of BCL2/IGH+ cells at diagnosis and MRD status during follow-up bear prognostic implications. Standard IF-RT fails to induce an MRD-negative status in half of patients. Most patients become MRD- following treatment with R and this is associated with a significantly better PFS., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In 2009, the four laboratories of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) minimal residual disease (MRD) Network started a collaborative effort to harmonize and standardize their methodologies at the national level, performing quality control (QC) rounds for follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) MRD assessment. In 16 QC rounds between 2010 and 2017, the four laboratories received 208 bone marrow (BM) samples (126 FL; 82 MCL); 187 were analyzed, according to the EuroMRD Consortium guidelines, by both nested (NEST) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative (RQ) PCR for BCL2/IGH MBR or IGHV rearrangements. Here, we aimed at analyzing the samples that challenged the interlaboratory reproducibility and data interpretation. Overall, 156/187 BM samples (83%) were concordantly classified as NEST+/RQ+ or NEST-/RQ- by all the four laboratories. The remaining 31 samples (17%) resulted alternatively positive and negative in the interlaboratory evaluations, independently of the method and the type of rearrangement, and were defined "borderline" (brd) samples: 12 proved NEST brd/RQ brd, 7 NEST-/RQ brd, 10 NEST brd/RQ positive not quantifiable (PNQ), and 2 NEST brd/RQ-. Results did not change even increasing the number of replicates/sample. In 6/31 brd samples, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was tested and showed no interlaboratory discordance. Despite the high interlaboratory reproducibility in the MRD analysis obtained and maintained by the QC round strategy, samples with the lowest MRD levels can still represent a challenge: 17% (31/187) of our samples showed discordant results in interlaboratory assessments, with 6.4% (12/187) remained brd even applying the two methods. Thus, although representing a minority, brd samples are still problematic, especially when a clinically oriented interpretation of MRD results is required. Alternative, novel methods such as ddPCR and next-generation sequencing have the potential to overcome the current limitations., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), there is a growing interest for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring, due to the availability of drug combinations capable of unprecedented complete clinical responses. The standardized and most commonly applied methods to assess MRD in CLL are based on flow cytometry (FCM) and, to a lesser extent, real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) primers of immunoglobulin heavy chain genes (IgH). Promising results are being obtained using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches, with some advantages and a potential higher sensitivity compared to the standardized methodologies. Plasma cell-free DNA can also be explored as a more precise measure of residual disease from all different compartments, including the lymph nodes. From a clinical point of view, CLL MRD quantification has proven an independent prognostic marker of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after chemoimmunotherapy as well as after allogeneic transplantation. In the era of mechanism-driven drugs, the paradigms of CLL treatment are being revolutionized, challenging the use of chemoimmunotherapy even in first-line. The continuous administration of ibrutinib single agent has led to prolonged PFS and OS in relapsed/refractory and treatment naïve CLL, including those with TP53 deletion/mutation or unmutated IGHV genes, though the clinical responses are rarely complete. More recently, chemo-free combinations of venetoclax+rituximab, venetoclax+obinutuzumab or ibrutinib+venetoclax have been shown capable of inducing undetectable MRD in the bone marrow, opening the way to protocols exploring a MRD-based duration of treatment, aiming at disease eradication. Thus, beside a durable disease control desirable particularly for older patients and/or for those with comorbidities, a MRD-negative complete remission is becoming a realistic prospect for CLL patients in an attempt to obtain a long-lasting eradication and possibly cure of the disease. Here we discuss the standardized and innovative technical approaches for MRD detection in CLL, the clinical impact of MRD monitoring in chemoimmunotherapy and chemo-free trials and the future clinical implications of MRD monitoring in CLL patients outside of clinical trials.

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first neoplasm where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be a fundamental tool to guide therapeutic choices. The most standardized methods to study MRD in ALL are multi-parametric flow cytometry (MFC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based methods. Emerging technologies hold the promise to improve MRD detection in ALL patients. Moreover, novel therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) represent exciting advancements in the management of B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL. Aims: Through a review of the literature and in house data, we analyze the current status of MRD assessment in ALL to better understand how some of its limitations could be overcome by emerging molecular technologies. Furthermore, we highlight the future role of MRD monitoring in the context of personalized protocols, taking into account the genetic complexity in ALL. Results and Conclusions: Molecular rearrangements (gene fusions and immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor-IG/TR gene rearrangements) are widely used as targets to detect residual leukemic cells in ALL patients. The advent of novel techniques, namely next generation flow cytometry (NGF), digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR), and next generation sequencing (NGS) appear important tools to evaluate MRD in ALL, since they have the potential to overcome the limitations of standard approaches. It is likely that in the forthcoming future these techniques will be incorporated in clinical trials, at least at decisional time points. Finally, the advent of new powerful compounds is further increasing MRD negativity rates, with benefits in long-term survival and a potential reduction of therapy-related toxicities. However, the prognostic relevance in the setting of novel immunotherapies still needs to be evaluated.

Introduction: The high-throughput era remarkably changed molecular laboratory practice. Actually, the increasing number of processed samples requires to reduce the risk of operator biases, by automating or simplifying as much as possible both the analytical and the pre-analytical phases. Minimal residual disease (MRD) studies in hematology often require a simultaneous processing of many bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from patients enrolled in prospective, multicenter, clinical trials, monitored at several planned time points., Methods: In this study, we demonstrate that red blood cell lysis (RBL) pre-analytical procedure can replace the time-consuming Ficoll stratification as cell recovering step. Here, we show a MRD comparison study using both total white blood cells and mononuclear cells recovered by the 2 procedures from 46 follicular lymphoma (FL), 15 multiple myeloma (MM), and 11 mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients enrolled in prospective clinical trials., Results: The experiments were performed in the 4 laboratories of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) MRD Network and showed superimposable results, in terms of good correlation (R = 0.87) of the MRD data obtained by recovering blood cells by the 2 approaches., Conclusion: Based on these results, the FIL MRD Network suggests to optimize the pre-analytical phases introducing RBL approach for cell recovery in the clinical trials including MRD analysis., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

BCL2/IGH rearrangements were analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at diagnosis in paired peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples from 67 patients with stage I/II follicular lymphoma (FL). Real time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) were performed in cases with a major breakpoint region (MBR+) at diagnosis and after localized radiotherapy and rituximab administration in order to investigate the applicability of ddPCR. The overall ddPCR/RQ-PCR concordance was 81·9% (113/138 samples) and 97·5% in the 40/138 with quantifiable disease (RQ-PCR≥10 -5 ). At baseline, ddPCR allowed the recovery of a MBR+ marker in 8/18 (44·4%) samples that resulted MBR-negative/minor cluster region-negative/minor BCL2-negative by qualitative PCR. Moreover, the tumour burden at diagnosis significantly predicted progression-free survival (PSF) only when quantified by ddPCR. Paired PB and BM samples analysis demonstrated a high concordance in the detection of BCL2/IGH+ cells by qualitative and quantitative methods; in particular, 40/62 samples were positive by ddPCR (25 PB+/BM+; 9 PB+/BM-; 6 PB-/BM+), with 34/40 (85%) identified by the study of PB only. In conclusion, in localized FL, ddPCR is a promising tool for monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) that is at least comparable to RQ-PCR and potentially more accurate. PB is a suitable source for serial BCL2/IGH MRD assessments, regardless of the methodology utilized., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) is a standardized tool for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The applicability of this technology is limited by the need of a standard curve based on diagnostic DNA. The digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) technology has been recently applied to various medical fields, but its use in MRD monitoring is under investigation. In this study, we analysed 50 ALL cases by both methods in two phases: in the first, we established analytical parameters to investigate the applicability of this new technique; in the second, we analysed MRD levels in 141 follow-up (FU) samples to investigate the possible use of ddPCR for MRD monitoring in ALL patients. We documented that ddPCR has sensitivity and accuracy at least comparable to those of RQ-PCR. Overall, the two methods gave concordant results in 124 of the 141 analysed MRD samples (88%, P = 0·94). Discordant results were found in 12% borderline cases. The results obtained prove that ddPCR is a reliable method for MRD monitoring in ALL, with the advantage of quantifying without the need of the calibration curves. Its application in a cohort of patients with a longer FU will conclusively define its clinical predictive value., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Accurate genomic characterization requires sufficient amounts of optimal quality DNA. An approach for increasing the DNA amount is the whole-genome amplification (WGA) method. We applied WGA to the molecular quantification and minimal residual disease (MRD) evaluation of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), aiming to compare the results obtained from genomic DNA and amplified DNA with WGA, and to evaluate the applicability and the reliability of WGA-DNA. Twenty paired samples from adult ALL patients were sequenced to identify the functional germline V-D-J segment at diagnosis; real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) quantitative analysis was performed both at diagnosis and follow-up. Genomic DNA and WGA-DNA screening identified equivalent 87 rearrangements. At diagnosis, the quantitative evaluation of genomic DNA samples showed 1 logarithm difference to WGA-DNA samples; these levels are comparable, being within the degree of acceptability and confidence. In the follow-up samples, RQ-PCR analysis on genomic DNA and WGA showed concordant MRD results in 16/18 samples, while 2/18 were MRD-positive outside the quantitative range by RQ-PCR (i.e. <5 × 10(-5)) on genomic DNA and MRD-negative on WGA-DNA. WGA-DNA enables: (i) the design of accurate targets for MRD evaluation in ALL patients, (ii) accurate disease quantification at diagnosis, (iii) MRD quantification comparable to genomic DNA., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)