Search

Background: The Bari-SolidAct randomized controlled trial compared baricitinib with placebo in patients with severe COVID-19. A post hoc analysis revealed a higher incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) among SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated participants who had received baricitinib. This sub-study aimed to investigate whether vaccination influences the safety profile of baricitinib in patients with severe COVID-19., Methods: Biobanked samples from 146 participants (55 vaccinated vs. 91 unvaccinated) were analysed longitudinally for inflammation markers, humoral responses, tissue viral loads, and plasma viral antigens on days 1, 3, and 8. High-dimensional analyses, including RNA sequencing and flow cytometry, were performed on available samples. Mediation analyses were used to assess relationships between SAEs, baseline-adjusted biomarkers, and treatment-vaccination status., Findings: Vaccinated participants were older, more frequently hospitalized, had more comorbidities, and exhibited higher nasopharyngeal viral loads. Baricitinib treatment did not affect antibody responses or viral clearance, but reduced markers of T-cell and monocyte activation compared to placebo (sCD25, sCD14, sCD163, sTIM-3). Age, baseline levels of plasma viral antigen, and several inflammatory markers, as well as IL-2, IL-6, Neopterin, CXCL16, sCD14, and suPAR on day 8 were associated with the occurrence of SAEs. However, mediation analyses of markers linked to SAEs, baricitinib treatment, or vaccination status did not reveal statistically significant interactions between vaccination status and SAEs., Interpretation: This sub-study did not identify any virus- or host-related biomarkers significantly associated with the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status and the safety of baricitinib. However, caution should be exercised due to the moderate sample size., Funding: EU Horizon 2020 (grant number 101015736)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MT has been a pro bono member of the scientific advisory board for Lilly. JP reports lecture fees from Gilead, Shionogi, and Mundipharma, as well as payment for expert testimony from Gilead, Shionogi, Eumedica, and Pfizer, and support for attending meetings from Gilead, and Shionogi. ARH reports personal fee from Pfizer (2021) for lectures outside the submitted work. RP reports personal fees from MSD (2024) for one lecture and from Gilead (2023) and Pfizer (2023) for congress attendance. LAM reports Helse Sør-Øst UiO and Research Council of Norway grant for developing cellular analyses of COVID-19 (2020–2022), grant from KG Jebsen Stiftelsen, and grant from The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation to monitor immune responses in patients (2021–2023). DC reports personal fees from Pfizer (2022) for a lecture outside the submitted work. BD reports support from Amgen for congress attendance. J-FT report honoraria from Shionogi, Merck, Pfizer, and Advanz as well as participation in advisory board for Gilead, Merck, Menarini, and Biomerieux. AEM reports stocks in Pfizer. LP reports honoraria from Gilead, GSK, Moderna, Pfizer, and ViiV Healthcare, as well as support for attending meetings from MSD and Pfizer. YZ reports payments for lectures from Gilead, Shionogi, and Mundipharma, payment for expert testimony from Gilead, Shionogi, Eumedica, and Pfizer, as well as support for attending meetings from Gilead and Shionogi. MB reports support for attending meetings from Gilead and Shionogi. JM reports support for attending meetings from Pfizer and Menarini as well as participation in advisory board for MSD. All other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases., Methods: This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates., Results: Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68)., Conclusions: Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. C. reports an human immunodeficiency virus grant from Janssen and lecture fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. F. M. reports grants and consulting fees from Pharmatheus, grants from Sanofi, and consulting fees from Ipsen, outside the submitted work. M. H. reports grants from the Belgian Center for Knowledge, the Fonds Erasme-COVID-Université Libre de Bruxelles, and the EU-Horizon programme, for the submitted work; support for attending meetings from Pfizer, MSD and Gilead, Pharmamar; support for participation on an advisory board for therapeutics on COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy trial); support for leadership for the Belgian guidelines on therapeutics for COVID-19; acting as president for the Belgian Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; and payment for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Gilead, GKS, INSMED, and Shionogi. J. P. reports lecture fees from Gilead and MSD; support for attending meetings from Gilead, Eumedica, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. C. B. reports participation on a DSMB for 4Living Biotech and consulting fees from Da Volterra and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. R. G. reports consulting fees from Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; lecture fees from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; support for attending meetings from Roche, Amgen, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Celgene, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Daiichi Sankvo; participation on a DSMB for Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; research grants from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; and stock or stock options from Novo Nordisk, Lilly. J.-A. P. reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals; lecture fees from Cepheid, Pfizer, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings from Pfizer and Gilead. C. A. reports lecture fees from Insmed, GSK, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi; grants or contracts from FEDER funding; support for attending meetings from Home perf; a leadership or fiduciary role as president of the Scientific Council of the French Respiratory Society; and serving as a member of the French ANRS-MIE for COVID and member of the COVID Group of the French Public Health High Council. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Setting-up a high quality, compliant and efficient pharmacovigilance (PV) system in multi-country clinical trials can be more challenging for academic sponsors than for companies. To ensure the safety of all participants in academic studies and that the PV system fulfils all regulations, we set up a centralized PV system that allows sponsors to delegate work on PV. This initiative was put in practice by our Inserm-ANRS MIE PV department in two distinct multinational European consortia with 19 participating countries: conect4children (c4c) for paediatrics research and EU-Response for Covid-19 platform trials. The centralized PV system consists of some key procedures to harmonize the complex safety processes, creation of a local safety officer (LSO) network and centralization of all safety activities. The key procedures described the safety management plan for each trial and how tasks were shared and delegated between all stakeholders. Processing of serious adverse events (SAEs) in a unique database guaranteed the full control of the safety data and continuous evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio. The LSO network participated in efficient regulatory compliance across multiple countries. In total, there were 1312 SAEs in EU-Response and 83 SAEs in c4c in the four trials. We present here the lessons learnt from our experience in four clinical trials. We managed heterogeneous European local requirements and implemented efficient communication with all trial teams. Our approach builds capacity for PV that can be used by multiple academic sponsors., (© 2023 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Baricitinib has shown efficacy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, but no placebo-controlled trials have focused specifically on severe/critical COVID, including vaccinated participants., Methods: Bari-SolidAct is a phase-3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling participants from June 3, 2021 to March 7, 2022, stopped prematurely for external evidence. Patients with severe/critical COVID-19 were randomised to Baricitinib 4 mg once daily or placebo, added to standard of care. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality within 60 days. Participants were remotely followed to day 90 for safety and patient related outcome measures., Results: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were screened, 284 randomised, and 275 received study drug or placebo and were included in the modified intent-to-treat analyses (139 receiving baricitinib and 136 placebo). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years, 77% were male and 35% had received at least one dose of SARS-CoV2 vaccine. There were 21 deaths at day 60 in each group, 15.1% in the baricitinib group and 15.4% in the placebo group (adjusted absolute difference and 95% CI - 0.1% [- 8·3 to 8·0]). In sensitivity analysis censoring observations after drug discontinuation or rescue therapy (tocilizumab/increased steroid dose), proportions of death were 5.8% versus 8.8% (- 3.2% [- 9.0 to 2.7]), respectively. There were 148 serious adverse events in 46 participants (33.1%) receiving baricitinib and 155 in 51 participants (37.5%) receiving placebo. In subgroup analyses, there was a potential interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on 60-day mortality. In a subsequent post hoc analysis there was a significant interaction between vaccination status and treatment allocation on the occurrence of serious adverse events, with more respiratory complications and severe infections in vaccinated participants treated with baricitinib. Vaccinated participants were on average 11 years older, with more comorbidities., Conclusion: This clinical trial was prematurely stopped for external evidence and therefore underpowered to conclude on a potential survival benefit of baricitinib in severe/critical COVID-19. We observed a possible safety signal in vaccinated participants, who were older with more comorbidities. Although based on a post-hoc analysis, these findings warrant further investigation in other trials and real-world studies. Trial registration Bari-SolidAct is registered at NCT04891133 (registered May 18, 2021) and EUClinicalTrials.eu ( 2022-500385-99-00 )., (© 2023. The Author(s).)