Search

Background: Previous studies have focused on the role of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in improving surgical conditions during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. However, a wide inter-individual variability has been noted. The aim of this study was to identify patient-related factors affecting surgeon satisfaction with the surgical space and surgery duration in laparoscopic bariatric surgery under deep NMB. Methods: One hundred eighty-five patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric bypass were enrolled. Anesthesia was standardized. A deep NMB was maintained together with fixed patient positioning (30 reverse Trendelenburg) and constant pneumoperitoneum pressure (14 mmHg) during the whole surgical procedure. Immediately after surgery, the surgeon was invited to state his satisfaction with the surgical space through a verbal numeric scale (VNS) ranging from 0 (extremely poor) to 10 (optimal). Results: VNS score was negatively correlated with male gender (r = − 0.35; p = 0.0001), BMI (r = − 0.16; p = 0.03), and age (r = − 0.20; p = 0.008). Surgery duration was positively correlated with male gender (r = 0.27; p = 0.0003) and BMI (r = 0.22; p = 0.006). Multivariate linear regressions showed that lower VNS scores were predicted by male gender (p = 0.000001) and increased age (p = 0.009), and that a longer surgery duration was predicted by male gender (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: Findings showed that male gender and higher patient age were independent predictors of lower surgeon satisfaction with the workspace during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Male gender also had a significant role in predicting longer surgery duration. The role of android obesity, which is more frequently associated with male gender, in affecting surgeon-perceived workspace conditions needs further investigation.

INTRODUCTION: It has been hypothesized that routine use of deep neuromuscular block (dNMB) is advisable in laparoscopic bariatric surgery in order to optimize workspace conditions. dNMB seems to have advantages in laparoscopic procedures on non-obese patients as it improves surgical space conditions and reduces postoperative pain scores. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing the impact of deep vs moderate NMB (mNMB) on surgical conditions and outcomes, including duration of surgery and postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Studies were identified from Medline, Embase and Cochrane library (update: Sep 1 2019). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing dNMB with mNMB were identified if they reported surgeon satisfaction for workspace conditions (primary outcome). The effects of dNMB on surgery duration and postoperative pain (secondary outcomes) were also investigated. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of the 45 retrieved records, 4 were finally included. dNMB improved the surgeon's satisfaction score about workspace (on a scale ranging from 1 to 5), with a mean difference (MD) of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.36-0.68). Surgical duration was not affected by block level (MD: -3.29 minutes; 95% CI: from -14.35 to 7.76). Only one study showed that dNMB also decreased postoperative pain. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that dNMB helps improve surgical space conditions in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery whereas it fails to shorten procedure duration. More high-quality large-sampled RCTs are needed to confirm these results. The relationship between dNMB use and other clinical outcomes, such as complications occurrence, needs to be further investigated.

objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the role of surgical setting (urgent vs. elective) and approach (open vs. laparoscopic) in affecting postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) prevalence in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. patients and methods: After local Ethical Committee approval, 409 patients who had undergone abdominal surgery between January and December 2014 were included in the final analysis. PPCs were defined as the development of one of the following new findings: respiratory failure, pulmonary infection, aspiration pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, atelectasis on chest X-ray, bronchospasm or un-planned urgent re-intubation. results: PPCs prevalence was greater in urgent (33%) vs. elective setting (7%) (X2with Yates correction: 44; p=0.0001) and in open (6%) vs. laparoscopic approach (1.9%) (X2with Yates correction: 12; p=0.0006). PPCs occurrence was positively correlated with in-hospital mortality (Biserial Correlation r=0.37; p=0.0001). Logistic regression showed that urgent setting (p=0.000), Ariscat (Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia) score (p=0.004), and age (p=0.01) were predictors of PPCs. A cutoff of 23 for Ariscat score was also identified as determining factor for PPCs occurrence with 94% sensitivity and 29% specificity. conclusions: Patients undergoing abdominal surgery in an urgent setting were exposed to a higher risk of PPCs compared to patients scheduled for elective procedures. Ariscat score fitted with PPCs prevalence and older patients were exposed to a higher risk of PPCs. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.