10 results on '"De Biasio, Laura"'
Search Results
2. Nursing students’ interprofessional educational experiences in the clinical context: findings from an Italian cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gonella, Silvia, Brugnolli, Anna, Mansutti, Irene, Saiani, Luisa, Terzoni, Stefano, Destrebecq, Anne, Zannini, Lucia, Grassetti, Luca, Dimonte, Valerio, Canzan, Federica, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, and Tollini, Morena
- Subjects
Male ,media_common.quotation_subject ,interprofessional cooperation ,Interprofessional Relations ,Context (language use) ,clinical learning ,Nursing ,interprofessional education ,nursing students ,student perception ,teamwork ,Likert scale ,03 medical and health sciences ,Nursing care ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Nurse education ,Education, Nursing ,media_common ,Teamwork ,030504 nursing ,business.industry ,Learning environment ,Research ,Multilevel model ,General Medicine ,Problem-Based Learning ,Interprofessional education ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Italy ,Linear Models ,Female ,Students, Nursing ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore nursing students’ interprofessional educational (IPE) experiences during their most recent clinical rotation and to explore the factors supporting IPE experiences.DesignNational cross-sectional study on data collected in 2016.Setting95 Bachelor of Nursing Sciences programmes; 27 Italian Universities.ParticipantsStudents who (a) were attending or just completed their clinical rotations lasting at least 2 weeks in the same unit, and (b) willing to participate in the study.Primary and secondary outcomesFirst to measure the occurrence of IPE experiences in the most recent clinical rotation; the secondary outcome was to discover factors associated with IPE occurrence.MeasuresThe primary outcome was measured using questions based on a 4-point Likert scale (from 0=‘never’ to 3=‘always’). Explanatory variables were collected at both individual and regional levels with items included in the same questionnaire.Results9607 out of 10 480 students took part in the study. Overall, 666 (6.9%) perceived not having had any IPE experience, while 3248 (33.8%), 3653 (38%) and 2040 (21.3%) reported having experienced IPE opportunities ‘only a little’, to ‘some extent’ or ‘always’, respectively. From the multilevel analysis performed using the generalised linear mixed model, factors promoting the occurrence of IPE experiences were mainly set at (a) the clinical learning environment level (high: learning environment quality, self-directed learning encouragement, learning opportunities, quality of safety and nursing care and quality of tutorial strategies); and (b) the regional level, where significant differences emerged across regions. In contrast, male gender was negatively associated with the perception of having had IPE experiences.ConclusionsA large number of nursing students experienced either ‘never’ or ‘only a little’ IPE opportunities, thus suggesting that nursing education tends to remain within the nursing profession. Limiting students’ interprofessional exposure during education can prevent future collaborative approaches that have been shown to be essential in providing best patient care. In order to increase IPE exposure, it is necessary to develop strategies designed both at the singular unit and regional levels.
- Published
- 2019
3. Multilevel National Analysis of Nursing Students’ Perceived Opportunity to Access Evidence‐Based Tools During Their Clinical Learning Experience
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, primary, Gonella, Silvia, additional, Grassetti, Luca, additional, Destrebecq, Anne, additional, Mansutti, Irene, additional, Terzoni, Stefano, additional, Zannini, Lucia, additional, Altini, Pietro, additional, Bevilacqua, Anita, additional, Brugnolli, Anna, additional, Dal Ponte, Adriana, additional, De Biasio, Laura, additional, Fascì, Adriana, additional, Grosso, Silvia, additional, Mantovan, Franco, additional, Marognolli, Oliva, additional, Nicotera, Raffaela, additional, Randon, Giulia, additional, Tollini, Morena, additional, Canzan, Federica, additional, Saiani, Luisa, additional, and Dimonte, Valerio, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Opportunity to discuss ethical issues during clinical learning experience
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, primary, Gonella, Silvia, additional, Destrebecq, Anne, additional, Mansutti, Irene, additional, Terzoni, Stefano, additional, Morsanutto, Michela, additional, Altini, Pietro, additional, Bevilacqua, Anita, additional, Brugnolli, Anna, additional, Canzan, Federica, additional, Ponte, Adriana Dal, additional, De Biasio, Laura, additional, Fascì, Adriana, additional, Grosso, Silvia, additional, Mantovan, Franco, additional, Marognolli, Oliva, additional, Nicotera, Raffaela, additional, Randon, Giulia, additional, Tollini, Morena, additional, Saiani, Luisa, additional, Grassetti, Luca, additional, and Dimonte, Valerio, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. [The Italian instrument evaluating the nursing students clinical learning quality - The Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index for nursing students]
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Grassetti, Luca, Mansutti, Irene, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Saiani, Luisa, and Zannini, Lucia
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Psychometrics ,Reproducibility of Results ,Nursing ,Education ,Italy ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Humans ,Learning ,Female ,Clinical Competence ,Education, Nursing ,Retrospective Studies ,Students, Nursing ,Students - Published
- 2017
6. [Validation of the Italian Clinical Learning Environment Instrument (SVIAT):BRstudy protocol]
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Grassetti, Luca, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, DAL PONTE, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mansutti, Irene, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Perli, Serena, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Zannini, Lucia, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
Education, Nursing ,Evaluation Studies as Topic ,Italy ,Learning ,Psychometrics ,Self Report ,Nursing ,Education - Abstract
Validation of the Italian Clinical Learning Environment Instrument (SVIAT): study protocol.Nursing students obtain most of their university credits in internship environments whose quality can affect their clinical learning. Several tools are available to measure the quality of the clinical learning environment (CLE) as perceived by students: these instruments developed in other countries, were validated in Italian but do not discriminate those CLEs capable (or not) to promote significant clinical learning.To validate an instrument to measure the capability of the CLE to generate clinical learning; the secondary aim is to describe the learning environments as perceived by nursing students according to individual course site and tutorial models adopted.The study will be developed in three phases: a) instrument development and pilot phase, b) validation of the psychometric properties of the instrument and c) description of the CLEs as perceived by the students including factors/item confirmed in the validation process. Expected outcomes. A large validation, with more than 8,000 participating students is expected; the construct under lying will be confirmed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and will report high internal consistency; the instrument will report also a high test-retest and inter-rater reliability; in addition, the instrument will demonstrate predictive ability by discriminating those units able (or not) to activate effective learning processes.
- Published
- 2016
7. Strumento di Valutazione Italiano degli Ambienti di Tirocinio per gli studenti infermieri (SVIAT): Protocollo di validazione
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Grassetti, Luca, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Dalponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mansutti, Irene, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Perli, Serena, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Zannini, Lucia, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
Assessment instrument ,Validation ,Clinical learning ,Clinical learning environment ,Nursing students ,Nursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous) - Published
- 2016
8. Opportunity to discuss ethical issues during clinical learning experience.
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gonella, Silvia, Destrebecq, Anne, Mansutti, Irene, Terzoni, Stefano, Morsanutto, Michela, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Canzan, Federica, Ponte, Adriana Dal, De Biasio, Laura, Fascì, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Tollini, Morena, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
ANALYSIS of variance ,CHI-squared test ,CLINICAL medicine ,COLLEGE students ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,ETHICS committees ,EXPERIENCE ,NURSING ethics ,NURSING students ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SCHOOL environment ,AUTODIDACTICISM ,SEX distribution ,STATISTICS ,STUDENTS ,DATA analysis ,CROSS-sectional method ,CLINICAL education ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,BACCALAUREATE nursing education ,INFERENTIAL statistics ,ODDS ratio ,KRUSKAL-Wallis Test - Abstract
Background: Undergraduate nursing students have been documented to experience ethical distress during their clinical training and felt poorly supported in discussing the ethical issues they encountered. Research aims: This study was aimed at exploring nursing students' perceived opportunity to discuss ethical issues that emerged during their clinical learning experience and associated factors. Research design: An Italian national cross-sectional study design was performed in 2015–2016. Participants were invited to answer a questionnaire composed of four sections regarding: (1) socio-demographic data, (2) previous clinical learning experiences, (3) current clinical learning experience quality and outcomes, and (4) the opportunity to discuss ethical issues with nurses in the last clinical learning experience (from 0 – 'never' to 3 – 'very much'). Participants and research context: Participants were 9607 undergraduate nursing students who were attending 95 different three-year Italian baccalaureate nursing programmes, located at 27 universities in 15 Italian regions. Ethical considerations: This study was conducted in accordance with the Human Subject Research Ethics Committee guidelines after the research protocol was approved by an ethics committee. Findings: Overall, 4707 (49%) perceived to have discussed ethical issues 'much' or 'very much'; among the remaining, 3683 (38.3%) and 1217 (12.7%) students reported the perception of having discussed, respectively, 'enough' or 'never' ethical issues emerged in the clinical practice. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis explaining 38.1% of the overall variance, the factors promoting ethical discussion were mainly set at the clinical learning environment levels (i.e. increased learning opportunities, self-directed learning, safety and nursing care quality, quality of the tutorial strategies, competences learned and supervision by a clinical nurse). In contrast, being male was associated with a perception of less opportunity to discuss ethical issues. Conclusion: Nursing faculties should assess the clinical environment prerequisites of the settings as a context of student experience before deciding on their accreditation. Moreover, the nursing faculty and nurse managers should also enhance competence with regard to discussing ethical issues with students among clinical nurses by identifying factors that hinder this learning opportunity in daily practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Lo strumento italiano di misurazione della qualità dell'apprendimento clinico degli studenti infermieri.
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Grassetti, Luca, Mansutti, Irene, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetto, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, and Randon, Giulia
- Published
- 2017
10. [The Italian instrument evaluating the nursing students clinical learning quality].
- Author
-
Palese A, Grassetti L, Mansutti I, Destrebecq A, Terzoni S, Altini P, Bevilacqua A, Brugnolli A, Benaglio C, Dal Ponte A, De Biasio L, Dimonte V, Gambacorti B, Fasci A, Grosso S, Mantovan F, Marognolli O, Montalti S, Nicotera R, Randon G, Stampfl B, Tollini M, Canzan F, Saiani L, and Zannini L
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Psychometrics standards, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Clinical Competence standards, Education, Nursing standards, Learning, Students, Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires standards
- Abstract
. The Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index for nursing students., Introduction: The Italian nursing programs, the need to introduce tools evaluating the quality of the clinical learning as perceived by nursing students. Several tools already exist, however, several limitations suggesting the need to develop a new tool., Aim: A national project aimed at developing and validating a new instrument capable of measuring the clinical learning quality as experience by nursing students., Methods: A validation study design was undertaken from 2015 to 2016. All nursing national programs (n=43) were invited to participate by including all nursing students attending regularly their clinical learning. The tool developed based upon a) literature, b) validated tools already established among other healthcare professionals, and c) consensus expressed by experts and nursing students, was administered to the eligible students., Results: 9606 nursing in 27 universities (62.8%) participated. The psychometric properties of the new instrument ranged from good to excellent. According to the findings, the tool consists in 22 items and five factors: a) quality of the tutorial strategies, b) learning opportunities; c) safety and nursing care quality; d) self-direct learning; e) quality of the learning environment., Conclusions: The tool is already used. Its systematic adoption may support comparison among settings and across different programs; moreover, the tool may also support in accrediting new settings as well as in measuring the effects of strategies aimed at improving the quality of the clinical learning.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.