Search

662 Background: Upper abdominal / lower back pain characterizes celiac plexus involvement from pancreatic and other cancers which may impair HRQOL; its satisfactory treatment is an unmet clinical need. We hypothesized that ablative radiation delivered to the celiac plexus would decrease pain and improve HRQOL. Methods: An international single arm Phase II study included patients with an average pain level ≥ 5/11 on the brief pain inventory (BPI), ECOG 0-2, and anatomical involvement of the celiac axis. The intervention was a single fraction of 25Gy delivered to the celiac plexus. The primary endpoint was ‘complete or partial (≥2 points) pain response’ based upon the BPI ‘average pain’ 11-point scale. Changes in Health-related QOL at 3 & 6 weeks compared to baseline were secondary endpoints as measured by FACT-Hep, > 8 point change being the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Evaluable patients included eligible irradiated subjects, who had stable pain levels pre-treatment, and were alive 3 weeks’ post-treatment. The sample size was 90 evaluable patients, giving 90% power to show response rate ≥ 40%. Opioid usage was assessed using intravenous morphine equivalent dose. Sensitivity HRQOL analyses imputed worsened outcomes (-9 for total FACT-Hep) for missing data. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, 149 patients were enrolled, 90/125 who received treatment were evaluable. Median age was 65.5 years (range 28-88), 65% were female, 92% had pancreatic cancer, and 86% had metastatic disease. Median Zubrod PS was 1, median number of systemic treatment lines was 1 (range 0-5), and median baseline opioid use 31 mg/d. At 3 weeks, 48 (53.3%, 95% CI 42.5-63.9) had at least a partial pain, the BPI ‘average pain’ score decreased by a mean of 2.5 points at 3 weeks (86/90 reported) and 3.2 points at 6 weeks (67/90 reported), both p < 0.001. Opioid usage decreased by 0.6 mg/d at 3 weeks (NS) and 16.9 mg/d at 6 weeks (p = 0.005). The FACT-Hep total score increased by 7.8 points at 3 weeks (54/90 reported, NS diff. from 8) and 16.6 points at 6 weeks (45/90 reported, sig. > 8, p = 0.01), showing an improvement in patients’ HRQOL. Changes in FACT-Hep were especially noted in the Physical Well Being subscale. The Trial Outcome Index (sum of physical, functional & disease-specific concerns) increased markedly at 3 weeks (6.6 points, p = 0.005) after treatment and even more after 6 weeks (14.5 points, p < 0.). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated improvements in HRQOL at 3 and 6 weeks (1.1, 3.8), but these were less than MCID. Conclusions: Celiac plexus SBRT decreases pain and opioid use amongst patients with pancreatic cancer and other tumors invading the celiac axis. The treatment appears to improve HRQOL. Supported by Gateway for Cancer Research and the Israel Cancer Association. Clinical trial information: NCT03323489 .

Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 (also known as ERBB2). The primary objective of the NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 trial was to establish whether trastuzumab improves disease-free survival when combined with trimodality treatment (paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy, followed by surgery) for patients with untreated HER2-overexpressing oesophageal adenocarcinoma.NRG Oncology/RTOG-1010 was an open label, randomised, phase 3 trial for which patients were accrued from 111 NRG-affiliated institutions in the USA. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed pathologically confirmed oesophageal adenocarcinoma, American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition T1N1-2 or T2-3N0-2 stage disease, and a Zubrod performance status of 0-2. Patients were stratified by adenopathy (no vs yes [coeliac absent] vs yes [coeliac present ≤2 cm]) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intravenous paclitaxel (50 mg/m606 patients were entered for HER2 assessment from Dec 30, 2010 to Nov 10, 2015, and 203 eligible patients who were HER2-positive were enrolled and randomly assigned to chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab (n=102) or chemoradiotherapy alone (n=101). Median duration of follow-up was 2·8 years (IQR 1·4-5·7). Median disease-free survival was 19·6 months (95% CI 13·5-26·2) with chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab compared with 14·2 months (10·5-23·0) for chemoradiotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0·99 [95% CI 0·71-1·39], log-rank p=0·97). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 41 (43%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group versus 52 (54%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group and grade 4 events occurred in 20 (21%) versus 21 (22%). The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events for both groups were haematological (53 [56%] of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group vs 55 [57%] of 96 patients in the chemotherapy group) or gastrointestinal disorders (28 [29%] vs 20 [21 %]). 34 (36%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group and 27 (28%) of 96 patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group had treatment-related serious adverse events. There were eight treatment-related deaths: five (5%) of 95 patients in the chemoradiotherapy plus trastuzumab group (bronchopleural fistula, oesophageal anastomotic leak, lung infection, sudden death, and death not otherwise specified), and three (3%) of 96 in the chemoradiotherapy group (two multiorgan failure and one sepsis).The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for HER2-overexpressing oesophageal cancer was not effective. Trastuzumab did not lead to increased toxicities, suggesting that future studies combining it with or using other agents targeting HER2 in oesophageal cancer are warranted.National Cancer Institute and Genentech.

Background: The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is increasing, particularly among the elderly (age ≥65 years). We sought to compare patterns of care for the treatment of SCCA in elderly versus nonelderly patients. Methods: Data for patients with stages I–III SCCA diagnosed from 2004 through 2015 were obtained from the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized as having received standard-of-care (SOC) chemoradiation (CRT) with multiagent chemotherapy, non-SOC therapy, palliative therapy, or no treatment. Differences in treatment groups were tested using the chi-square test. We used logistic regression to identify predictors of SOC CRT and multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy in patients receiving CRT. Propensity score matching was used to compare overall survival (OS) in elderly patients receiving multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy for those receiving CRT. Results: We identified 9,156 elderly and 17,640 nonelderly patients. A lower proportion of elderly versus nonelderly patients (54.5% vs 65.0%; PPP1.5-fold increase in the likelihood of elderly patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.39–1.66) in multivariate analysis. After propensity score matching, 3-year OS was higher in elderly patients who received CRT with multiagent versus single-agent chemotherapy (77.1% vs 67.5%; hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68–0.89; P=.0002). Conclusions: In this comprehensive study of patients with stages I–III SCCA, elderly patients were less likely than nonelderly patients to receive SOC CRT. The low proportion of elderly patients receiving SOC CRT with multiagent chemotherapy for localized anal cancer suggests that the optimal treatment approach for this vulnerable population remains undefined.

The optimal treatment for stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) remains undefined. Recently, wide local excision alone was found to have comparable survival to those treated with chemoradiation (CRT). Given that local excision may be sufficient for the treatment of stage I SCCA, we hypothesized that radiation therapy (RT) alone, compared to CRT would result in equivalent overall survival (OS) in this population. We identified non-surgically treated patients with stage I SCCA from the National Cancer Database from 2004&ndash, 2015. We included only patients treated either with CRT (45&ndash, 59.4 Gy with chemotherapy initiated within 14 days of RT) or RT alone (45&ndash, 59.4 Gy with no chemotherapy). The primary endpoint was OS between CRT and RT patients. Propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the effect of concurrent chemotherapy on OS using a Cox proportional hazards model with robust standard error to account for clustering in matched pairs. We identified 3552 stage I patients treated with CRT and 287 treated with RT. Compared to patients treated with CRT, those that received RT were more likely to be &ge, 70 years old (33.1% vs. 19.7%, p &lt, 0.001) and less likely to be female (63.1% vs. 71.0%, p &lt, 0.001). The proportion of patients with a Charlson-Deyo score of 0 was similar in both groups (80.8% RT vs. 82.7% CRT, p = 0.164). The PSM cohort consisted of 287 pairs of patients with median follow-up 48.3 months (interquartile range, 24.4&ndash, 85.1 months) and 151 deaths (86 RT, 65 CRT). CRT was associated with a 31% reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.50&ndash, 0.95, p = 0.023). We found that CRT was associated with improved OS, compared to RT alone, in patients with non-surgically treated stage I SCCA. These data suggest that de-intensification of therapy in stage I SCCA must be used with caution. However, given the retrospective nature of the data, prospective trials are required.

e15659 Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive hepatobiliary malignancy characterized by local infiltration and lymph node, lung, and bone metastases. The majority of patients die from tumor-related liver failure. The standard of care for metastatic ICC is chemotherapy (CHT) and the role of local therapy to the liver is unclear. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare overall survival (OS) of patients treated with CHT, with and without local radiotherapy (RT) or surgery of the liver. Methods: We evaluated patients with metastatic ICC who received CHT with or without hepatic surgery or external beam RT to a dose ≥ 45 Gy. We used multiple imputation followed by cox proportional hazards and nearest neighbor propensity score matching (1:1, caliper = 0.1) on the basis of age, sex, race, comorbidity score, T-stage, tumor size, N-stage, primary tumor focality, primary tumor vascular invasion, year of diagnosis, insurance status, and treatment facility, as well as presence of bone, lung, and lymph node metastases. Results: We identified 2201 patients who received either CHT alone (n = 2097), or with hepatic surgery (n = 76) or RT (n = 28). Liver-directed local therapy was associated with improved OS on univariate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 95% CI 0.15 - 0.71; p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.49 - 0.75; p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS between RT versus surgery (HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.76 - 2.46; p = 0.30). After propensity score matching, there were 104 patients in each cohort. Liver therapy continued to be associated with improved OS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 - 0.81; p = 0.001). Conclusions: We found that addition of local therapy to the liver with surgery or RT is associated with higher OS when compared to CHT alone in metastatic ICC. These findings should be validated in an independent cohort.

4123 Background: In the metastatic or adjuvant setting for pancreatic cancer, the combination chemotherapy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) resulted in longer overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine therapy. We conducted an institutional study to compare the efficacy of neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX (neo-mFOLFIRINOX) to adjuvant gemcitabine (adj-gem) for pancreatic cancer patients who completed resection. Methods: The study retrospectively enrolled patients from 2006 to 2017 from Ohio State University. While patients who received adjuvant gemcitabine were considered to be resectable upfront, patients who received neo-mFOLFIRINOX were either staged as borderline resectable (BR) or un-resectable (UR) by the institutional tumor board group. 111 patients received adj-gem (average cycles, 5.5) and 52 patients received neo-mFOLFIRINOX (average cycles, 3.5). The survival rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed using Cox regression and log-rank test. Results: At a median follow up of 21.3 months, the median OS was 35.4 months in the neo-mFOLFIRINOX group and 21.8 months in the adj-gem group (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.84 p = 0.005). The OS rate at 3 years was 46% in the neo-mFOLFIRINOX group and 22% in the adjuvant gemcitabine group (p = 0.001). The median disease free survival (DFS) was 18.6 months in the neo-mFOLFIRINOX group and 12.0 months in the adj-gem group (hazard ratio, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.43-0.93 p = 0.022). The DFS rate at 3 years was 17% in the neo-mFOLFIRINOX group and 11% in the adj-gem group (p = 0.02). On surgical pathological specimen review, the neo-mFOLFIRINOX group had statistically (p < 0.05) lower tumor grade, lower rates of perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion, lower pathological T stage, lower pathological N stage, and lower number of nodes positive compared to the adj-gem group. Frequencies of obtaining R0 resections were higher in the neo-mFOLFIRINOX versus adj-gem groups but not statistically different (51.9% vs 40.4, p = 0.2). The average age and performance status were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: At our institution, BR and UR pancreatic cancer patients who received neo-mFOLFIRINOX and completed resection had longer OS, DFS, and more favorable pathological indicators compared to those patients who had upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine. Randomized clinical trials comparing neoadjuvant versus adjuvant FOLFIRINOX are needed to validate these findings.

673 Background: There is no randomized prospective evidence to clarify the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in localized colon cancer. Despite this, national consensus guidelines recommend that adjuvant radiotherapy be considered for patients with T4 disease. Given the lack of prospective data, the aim of this study was to evaluate the role of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) in colon cancer using two large national databases to help to guide treatment decisions. Methods: We evaluated the association of receipt of adjuvant RT with overall survival (OS), using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER), as well as with disease-specific survival (DSS) using SEER. We analyzed cohorts of patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced T4 adenocarcinoma of the colon, who underwent oncologic surgery with or without adjuvant radiation and had at least 5 years of follow up. For the NCDB cohort, we restricted RT patients to those who received a dose of 45-60 Gy and those who received treatment within 3 months after surgery. We used nearest-neighbor propensity score matching on the basis of age, race, sex, year of diagnosis, grade, N-stage, receipt of chemotherapy, anatomical subsite, margin status, and comorbidity score. To validate our findings, using SEER, we used propensity matching using the same covariates (except comorbidity). Results: After matching of the NCDB cohort, cox regression showed no statistically significant association of adjuvant radiotherapy with OS (HR=1.08; 95% CI 0.89 - 1.30; p=0.448). Using SEER, cox regression showed no statistically significant association of adjuvant radiotherapy with OS (HR=0.9; 95% CI 0.50 - 1.63; p=0.731) or DSS (HR=0.84; 0.54 – 1.33; p=0.46). Conclusions: In summary, after comprehensively adjusting for covariates using two independent national databases, we found no statistically significant association of adjuvant RT with overall- or disease-specific survival for T4 colon cancer. These findings are limited by the retrospective nature of the data and should be tested in a prospective fashion.