Search

Objective: The best aortic prosthesis type in 60-70 year old patients is not established. Our aim was to evaluate the survival in a National cohort of patients between 60-70 years old who required surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis (SAVR) with either a mechanical (MP) or bioprosthesis (BP) valve., Methods: This is a retrospective study using national data from the Ministry of Health. We included all patients between 60 to 70 years old who underwent SAVR for aortic stenosis in Uruguay from 2011 to 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival according to type of prosthesis used stratified by effect modifiers. The independent effects of gender and use of statins were evaluated., Results: We included 1196 patients (66±3.0 years old; 39.1% female). Mortality was higher for BP (296, 29.9%%) than MP (36, 17.1%; p<0.001). Median follow-up time was 4.5 years (Interquartile range [IQR] 3.4-6.5). The unadjusted incidence rate ratio was higher for BP (Incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.43;95%CI: 0.99, 2.14, p = 0.045). The effect of BP on mortality rate was greater in males (IRR = 1.82;95%CI:1.14,2.92. p interaction = 0.08) and patients who were not taking statins (IRR = 1.97;95%CI:1.14,3.41. p interaction = 0.06). The use of BP was an independent predictor of overall survival in male patients (Hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32;95%CI: 1.68, 1.04. p = 0.021) and in patients who were not taking statins (HR = 2.07;95%CI: 1.17, 3.67. p = 0.013)., Conclusion: The use of BP was associated with worse survival in male patients and patients not taking statins. Gender and statins use should contribute to type of prosthesis decision in the 60-69 age group., Competing Interests: UCL receives funding from EACTS for methodological advice and teaching. Fee for consultation for ALK, AstraZeneca and Sanofi Aventis and sit on a data monitoring committee for Orion. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare., (Copyright: © 2024 Dayan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Prevalence of bioprosthetic valve degeneration (BVD) is rising as the use of bioprosthetic aortic valves increases. Detecting early signs of BVD remains a challenge, with conventional imaging methods often failing to identify early deterioration stages. 18F-fuoride positron emission tomography (PET-CT) is an emerging technique that offers promising prospects to detect subclinical BVD. This study aimed to compare early PET parameters of fluoride uptake with echocardiographic hemodynamic parameters and compare outcomes according to anticoagulation in patients who received bioprosthetic valves., Methods: This is a sub-study of the ANTIPRO clinical trial, which involved patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with a porcine bioprosthesis and randomized them into anticoagulated and non-anticoagulated groups. Hemodynamic changes were assessed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), while 18F-fluoride PET-CT quantified fluoride uptake and divided the patients in two groups: high-uptake and low-uptake. Mean and maximum gradients by TTE at three years were compared between the two uptake groups. Fluoride uptake was also compared between the anticoagulated and control groups., Results: We found no significant differences in transprosthetic gradients between high-uptake(21.4 ± 8.6 mmHg) and low-uptake(17.3 ± 11.2 mmHg.p = 0.244) PET-defined groups in this specific timeframe. Notably, anticoagulated patients exhibited significantly risk of higher fluoride uptake(OR = 4.34;95%CI:1.04-18.21.p = 0.045)., Conclusions: No association was found between fluoride uptake and hemodynamic evaluation. Anticoagulation was associated with higher fluoride uptake. These findings highlight the emerging role of PET-CT in studying bioprosthetic aortic valves and emphasize the need for extended follow-up to evaluate the impact of anticoagulation on valve degeneration., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The structural and functional integrity of conduits used for coronary artery bypass grafting is critical for graft patency. Disruption of endothelial integrity and endothelial dysfunction are incurred during conduit harvesting subsequent to mechanical or thermal injury and during conduit storage prior to grafting, leading to acute thrombosis and early graft failure. Late graft failure, in particular that of vein grafts, is precipitated by progressive atherogenesis. Intra-operative management includes appropriate selection of conduit-specific harvesting techniques and storage solutions. Arterial grafts are prone to vasospasm subsequent to surgical manipulation, and application of intra-operative vasodilatory protocols is critical. Post-operative management includes continuation of oral vasodilator therapy and selection of antithrombotic and lipid-lowering agents to attenuate atherosclerotic disease progression in conduits. In this review, the scientific evidence underlying the key aspects of intra- and post-operative management of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting is examined. Clinical consensus statements for best clinical practice are provided, and areas requiring further research are highlighted., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Most evidence for anticoagulation in aortic bioprosthesis is centered on embolic events, bleeding and re-intervention risk. The effect of anticoagulation on hemodynamics has not been previously assessed. Our hypothesis was that patients with anticoagulation (AC) early after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with porcine bioprosthesis have better hemodynamics at 3 years of follow-up., Methods: This is a follow-up evaluation of the ANTIPRO trial. All patients undergoing AVR with porcine bioprosthesis were consecutively recruited. The AC group received warfarin+aspirin and the non-AC(control) only aspirin. The primary outcome was mean gradient after 3 years of AVR and change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. Secondary outcomes were major and minor bleeding and embolic events., Results: Of 140 participants in the study, 71 were assigned to the AC group and 69 to the control group. Mean age of the overall population was 72.4(SD: 7.1) years. Global euroSCORE was 7.65(SD: 5.73). At 3 years the mean gradient was similar between both groups (19.4(SD: 9.6 mmHg) and 18.6(SD: 8.2 mmHg) in the control and AC group respectively, p = 0.7). No differences in functional class at 3 years were found among groups. No differences were found among groups in the secondary outcomes., Conclusions: The addition of 3 months of oral anticoagulation to anti-aggregation treatment did not affect bioprosthetic hemodynamics nor functional class at years after AVR., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: The DANAMI-3 DEFER study demonstrated that deferring stent implantation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is safe, although not superior to immediate stenting. It is possible that an individualized revascularization strategy in STEMI, achieved through appropriate patient selection, could be feasible and effective., Methods: This prospective, non-randomized study included 198 patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between October 2019 and November 2021. Patients were assigned to either the deferred stenting (DS) group (n = 19) or the control group (C) undergoing immediate stenting (n = 179) based on a multimodal approach integrating coronary angiography, intravascular imaging, physiological assessments, and clinical judgment. The primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)., Results: The DS group showed a significantly lower rate of stent implantation (10.5 % vs. 97.7 %, p < 0.001) and a higher use of thrombus aspiration (89.5 % vs. 30.7 %, p < 0.001) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (31.6 % vs. 6.7 %, p < 0.001) compared to the C group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of all-cause mortality (5.3 % vs. 8.9 %, p = 0.59) or MACCE (10.5 % vs. 8.4 %, p = 0.71)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing individualized reperfusion strategies in STEMI within a real-world clinical setting. The findings, while limited by the study design, generate valuable hypotheses that warrant further investigation to refine patient selection criteria and optimize outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. No financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations could inappropriately influence (bias) their work., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular diseases represent a major burden worldwide, and clinical trials are critical to define treatment improvements. Since various conflicts of interest (COIs) may influence trials at multiple levels, cardiovascular research represents a paradigmatic example to analyze their effects and manage them effectively to re-establish the centrality of evidence-based medicine.Despite the manifest role of industry, COIs may differently affect both sponsored and non-sponsored studies in many ways. COIs influence may start from the research question, data collection and adjudication, up to result reporting, including the spin phenomenon. Outcomes and endpoints (especially composite) choice and definitions also represent potential sources for COIs interference. Since large randomized controlled trials significantly influence international guidelines, thus impacting also clinical practice, their critical assessment for COIs is mandatory. Despite specific protocols aimed to mitigate COI influence, even scientific societies and guideline panels may not be totally free from COIs, negatively affecting their accountability and trustworthiness.Shared rules, awareness of COI mechanisms and transparency with external data access may help promoting evidence-based research and mitigate COIs impact. Managing COIs effectively should preserve public trust in the cardiovascular profession without compromising the positive relationships between investigators and industry., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Composite end points are common primary outcomes in clinical trials. Their main benefit of utilizing a composite outcome is increasing the number of primary outcome events, meaning fewer participants are required to deliver an adequately powered trial. By combining multiple important end points in the primary outcome rather than having to select only 1, composite end points potentially make clinically meaningful benefits easier to detect and avoid ranking outcomes hierarchically. However, there are a number of important considerations when designing and interpreting clinical trials that utilize composite end points. In this Statistical Primer, issues with composite end points such as competing events, halo effect, risk of bias, time-to-event limitations and the win ratio are discussed in the context of real world clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: We explored the current evidence on coronary disease treatment comparing the survival of 2 therapeutic strategies: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES)., Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing CABG versus PCI with DES. The end point was overall mortality. Two statistical approaches were used: the generic inverse variance method, which was used to pool the incident rate ratios, and the pooled meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data., Results: Eight randomized clinical trials comparing 4975 patients undergoing CABG and 4992 patients undergoing PCI were included in our meta-analysis. Generic inverse variance method showed a statistically significant survival benefit of the CABG group (incident rate ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.35; P < .01). The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, and 10 years of the CABG group were 97.1%, 90.3%, and 80.3%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival at 1, 5, and 10 years of the PCI group were 97.0%, 87.7%, and 76.4%, respectively. The log-rank analysis confirmed a statistically significant benefit in term of overall mortality of the CABG group (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.38; P = .0001)., Conclusions: The present meta-analysis suggests that CABG provides a consistent survival benefit over PCI with DES., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The ISCHEMIA trial is a landmark study that has been the subject of heated debate within the cardiovascular community. In this analysis of the ISCHEMIA trial, we aim to set the record straight on the benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and the misinterpretation of this landmark trial. We sought to clarify and reorient this misinterpretation., Methods: We herein analyse the ISCHEMIA trial in detail and describe how its misinterpretation has led to an erroneous guideline recommendation downgrading for prognosis-altering surgical therapy in these at-risk patients., Results: The interim ISCHEMIA trial findings align with previous evidence where CABG reduces the long-term risks of myocardial infarction and mortality in advanced coronary artery disease. The trial outcomes of a significantly lower rate of cardiovascular mortality and a higher rate of non-cardiovascular mortality with the invasive strategy are explained according to landmark evidence., Conclusions: The ISCHEMIA trial findings are aligned with previous evidence and should not be used to downgrade recommendations in recent guidelines for the indisputable benefits of CABG., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: There is a lack of information about cardiac surgery training and professional practice in Latin American (LATAM) countries. This study is the first comparative analysis of cardiac surgical training and professional practice across LATAM and provides the fundamentals for future academic projects of the Latin American Association of Cardiac and Endovascular Surgery (LACES)., Methods: International survey-based comparative analysis of the training and professional practice of cardiac surgeons across LATAM. Trainees (residents/fellows) and staf (graduated) surgeons from LATAM countries were included., Results: A total of 289 respondents (staf surgeons N=221 [76.5%]; residents/fellows N=68 [23.5%]) from 18 different countries participated in the survey. Most surgeons (N=92 [45.3%]) reported being unsatisfied with their salaries. Most respondents (N=181 [62.6%]) stated that it was difficult to obtain a leadership position, and 149 (73.8%) stated that it was difficult to find a job after completing training. Only half of the trainee respondents (N=32 [47.1%]) reported that their program had all resident spots occupied. Only 22.1% (N=15) of residents/fellows were satisfied with their training programs. The majority (N=205 [70.9%]) of respondents would choose cardiac surgery as their specialty again. Most surgeons (N=129 [63.9%]) and residents/fellows (N=52 [76.5%]) indicated that the establishment of a LATAM cardiac surgery board examination would be beneficial., Conclusion: Modernization and standardization of training, as well as greater access to opportunities, may be required in LATAM to increase professional satisfaction of cardiac surgeons and to reduce disparities in the specialty. Such changes may enhance the regional response to the dynamic challenges in the feld.

Objectives: Most evidence for anticoagulation (AC) in aortic bioprosthesis is centred on embolic events, bleeding and reintervention risk. The effect of AC on haemodynamics has not been previously assessed. Our hypothesis was that patients with early AC after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with porcine bioprosthesis have better haemodynamics at 1 year of follow-up., Methods: Prospective, randomized, open-label trial conducted at 2 cardiac surgery centres. All patients undergoing AVR with porcine bioprosthesis were consecutively recruited. The anticoagulated group received warfarin + aspirin and the non-anticoagulated (control) only aspirin. The primary outcome was mean gradient after 1 year of AVR and change in New York Heart Association class. Secondary outcomes were major and minor bleeding, embolic events and prosthetic leak., Results: Of 140 participants in the study, 71 were assigned to the anticoagulated group and 69 to the control group. The mean age of the overall population was 72.4 (SD: 7.1) years. Global EuroSCORE was 7.65 (SD: 5.73). At 1 year, the mean gradient was similar between both groups [18.6 (SD: 1.1 mmHg) and 18.1 (SD: 1.0 mmHg) in the control and anticoagulated groups, respectively, P = 0.701]. No differences in functional class at 3 months or 1 year were found among groups. No differences were found among groups in the secondary outcomes., Conclusions: The addition of 3 months of oral AC to anti-aggregation treatment was not detected to affect bioprosthetic haemodynamics nor functional class at 1 year after AVR. Likewise, AC does not lead to the higher incidence of complications., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), 93% of the population lacks safe, timely, and affordable access to cardiac surgical care when needed. As countries slowly build or expand local, independent cardiac centers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) partially bridge the gap in cardiac surgical care delivery in LMICs. However, little is known about the current scope of cardiac NGOs. Here, we perform an analysis of active NGOs involved with the delivery of cardiac surgical services in LMICs or for patients from LMICs. Cardiac surgery NGOs were identified from medical literature, established NGO databases, and Google Scholar searches. The search was performed between December 2019 and May 2020. NGOs whose websites were not updated or described missions or projects taking place no later than 2015 were considered inactive. Eighty-six NGOs are actively providing cardiac surgery services in LMICs or treating patients from LMICs. Five NGOs performed adult cardiac surgery only, 56 performed pediatric cardiac surgery only, and 25 performed both adult and pediatric cardiac surgery. NGOs originated from 23 different countries and were operational in a total of 111 countries, 96 of them being LMICs. Fifty-three NGOs reported data on annual surgical volume, of which half performed less than 50 operations per year. NGOs effectively address the burden of cardiac surgical disease in LMICs and contribute to local capacity-building. Increased, more detailed, and standardized reporting of the impact and outcomes of NGOs is necessary to better understand annual cardiac surgical volume and to support local centers working towards independent services., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, cardiac surgeries in patients with previous infection by COVID-19 were suspended or postponed, which led to surgeries performed in patients with an advanced stage of their disease and an increase in the waiting list. There is a heterogeneous attitude in Latin America on the optimal timing to cardiac surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection due to scarce data on its outcome. Two Latin American associations joined to establish common suggestions on the optimal timing of surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection., Methods: Data collection was performed using a pre-established form, which included year of publication, objective, type of study (prospective/retrospective, descriptive/analytical), number of patients, year of study, waiting time between infection and surgery, type of surgery, morbidity, mortality, and conclusions regarding the association between mortality and morbidity. Final recommendations were approved by the board of directors of Latin American Association of Cardiac and Endovascular Surgery (LACES) and Latin American Confederation of Anesthesia Societies (CLASA)., Results: Of the initial 1,016 articles, 11 comprised the final selection. Only six of them included patients who underwent cardiac surgery. According to the analyzed literature, optimal timing for cardiac surgery needs to consider the following aspects: deferable surgery, symptomatic COVID-19 infection, completeness of COVID-19 vaccination., Conclusion: These recommendations derive from the analysis of the scarce literature published at present on outcomes after cardiac surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection. These are to be taken as a dynamic recommendation in which Latin American reality was taken into consideration.