Search

Until recently, diet as a therapeutic tool to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been proven effective. Nearly a century in the making we are in the grips of a revolution in diet therapies for IBD, driven by emerging data revealing diet as a key environmental factor associated with IBD susceptibility, and observational studies suggesting that dietary intake may play a role in the disease course of established IBD. This review summarizes the current evidence for diets trialed as induction and maintenance therapy for IBD. For Crohn's disease, exclusive enteral nutrition and the Crohn's disease exclusion diet with partial enteral nutrition are supported by emerging high‐quality evidence as induction therapy, but are short‐term approaches that are not feasible for prolonged use. Data on diet as maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease are conflicting, with some studies supporting fortification, and others suppression, of certain food components. For ulcerative colitis, data are not as robust for diet as induction and maintenance therapy; however, consistent themes are emerging, suggesting benefits for diets that are plant‐based, high in fiber and low in animal protein. Further studies for both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are eagerly awaited, which will allow specific recommendations to be made. Until this time, recommendations default to population based healthy eating guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Measuring food‐related quality of life (FRQoL) quantifies the psychosocial impact of eating and drinking. FRQoL and associated factors are not well explored in people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), despite IBD being a chronic disease affecting the digestive tract. The present study aimed to characterise and identify any patient or disease‐related predictors of FRQoL in individuals with IBD. Methods: Adults with a formal diagnosis of IBD were recruited to a prospective multicentre cross‐sectional study between April 2018 and December 2019. Participants completed questionnaires measuring FRQoL (FRQoL‐29), clinical disease activity (Harvey Bradshaw Index and Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index), restrictive eating behaviour (Nine‐Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen), mental health (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale‐21) and other patient and disease‐related variables. A multivariable regression was performed to identify factors associated with FRQoL. Results: One hundred and eight participants completed the questionnaires (n = 39, Crohn's disease; n = 69, ulcerative colitis). The mean FRQoL was 79 (95% confidence interval = 75–84) (poor, 0; superior, 145). Poorer FRQoL was observed in those with restrictive eating behaviour associated with fear of a negative consequence from eating (p < 0.0001) and reduced appetite (p < 0.030). Greater FRQoL was observed in those with lower disease activity (p < 0.0001) and previous IBD surgery (p = 0.024). FRQoL was not associated either way by IBD phenotype, duration, or gender. The majority of participants obtained their dietary information from the internet (60%) or gastroenterologist (46%). Conclusions: FRQoL in people with IBD is poorer in those with restrictive eating behaviours and clinically active disease. Interestingly, it was greater in those with previous IBD surgery. Further research is required to validate these associations and explore longitudinal effects of poor FRQoL on patient outcomes and potential strategies for prevention or management of impaired FRQoL in IBD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Methods Results Conclusions Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) impact quality of life and represent a significant burden on healthcare services. Guidelines recommend an early, positive diagnosis to reduce harmful over‐investigation in FGID patients. The aim of this multicentre study was to evaluate FGID management against current guidelines.A multicentre, retrospective evaluation of patients with a primary diagnosis of FGID across two tertiary gastroenterology services over a 12‐month period was performed. Time to diagnosis of a FGID, number of outpatient encounters, number and type of investigations performed and time to discharge from the outpatient service were assessed. Whether care was delivered by single or multiple clinicians was recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test, logistic regression analysis and Kaplan–Meir curves.Between June 2021 and June 2022, 275 individual patients were reviewed primarily for FGID. Median time to FGID diagnosis was 70 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0–175), over a median of four outpatient encounters (IQR: 3–6), with an overall time in service of 182 days (IQR: 105–344). When care was delivered by a single rather than multiple clinicians, patients were more likely to receive a FGID diagnosis early (hazard ratio (HR): 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25–2.04, P < 0.0001), be discharged sooner (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.44–2.33, P < 0.0001), with a trend towards less harmful investigations (odds ratio: 1.79, 95% CI: 0.96–3.58, P = 0.08).Consistent delivery of clinical care reduces healthcare utilisation in the management of FGIDs. Further studies are needed to identify optimal care models for managing outpatients with FGIDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diet therapy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an international research priority but guidance for IBD-specific diet trial design is lacking. This review critically evaluates key elements of prospective IBD food-based intervention trials and identifies gaps. Electronic databases were searched for interventional IBD diet studies. Prospective primary studies/trials were included if used food-based dietary strategies. Forty studies/trials evaluating 29 food-based strategies as therapy for IBD were identified. Considerable heterogeneity in diets, trial design, and methodology exists. Thirty-one trials (78%) intended the diet to modulate inflammation but 14/31 (46%) did not have a primary endpoint measuring an objective change in inflammatory activity and 20/31 (65%) controlled for medication stability prior to application of diet at baseline. Higher-quality IBD diet trials used symptom-based assessment tools coupled with an objective evaluation of inflammatory activity. Dietary advice trials are the most common. One-third of trials developed and administered diet education without a dietitian. Evaluation and reporting on adherence to diet therapy occurred in <60% of trials. Failure to include or report on key elements of trial design reduced the interpretability and validity of the results. This is a considerable limitation to advancing scientific knowledge in this area. Diet therapy trials should adhere to similar rigorous quality standards used to develop other IBD therapies. Therefore, a set of practical recommendations was generated to provide the authors' perspective to help inform the future design of high-quality IBD diet trials., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)