Search

The objective of this research was to evaluate a biallelic genetic marker identified in the first promoter region of the bovine IGF-I gene. The point mutation was identified as a T-to-C transition by sequencing the polymorphic fragments. A PCR-RFLP procedure was developed for determining the marker genotypes. Marker genotypes were determined for 760 Angus calves from divergent lines that were created by selection for high or low serum IGF-I concentration (allele A: 63.9%, B: 36.1%). Data were analyzed using the multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximum likelihood computer programs with animal models. The full animal model included fixed effects of marker genotype, birth year, season of birth, sex, age of dam, and selection line; random effects of animal, maternal genetic, and maternal permanent environmental effects; and a covariate for age of calf. Traits analyzed included blood serum IGF-I concentrations on d 28, 42, and 56 of the postweaning test, mean IGF-I concentration, birth weight, weaning weight, on-test weight, off-test weight, off-test hip height, postweaning gain, and weight gain during the 20-d period immediately after weaning. Results from the analysis across selection lines showed a significant association of the BB genotype with higher weight gain during the first 20 d after weaning and a slight dominance effect of the marker on postweaning gain. Analysis within the low IGF-I line also showed a significant association of the BB genotype with higher weight gain during the first 20 d after weaning and with on-test weight, although analysis within the high IGF-I line did not show any significant association. The associated effects of the marker need to be verified in other cattle populations. Key Words: Beef Cattle, Growth, Insulin-like Growth Factor, Polymorphism

Divergent selection for serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentration began at the Eastern Ohio Resource Development Center (EORDC) in 1989 using 100 spring-calving (50 high line and 50 low line) and 100 fall-calving (50 high line and 50 low line) purebred Angus cows. Following weaning, bull and heifer calves were fed in drylot for a 140-d postweaning period. At the conclusion of the postweaning test, bulls not selected for breeding were slaughtered and carcass data were collected at a commercial abbatoir. At the time of this analysis, IGF-I measurements were available for 1,283 bull and heifer calves, and carcass data were available for 452 bulls. A set of multiple-trait, derivative-free, restricted maximum likelihood (MTDFREML) computer programs were used for data analysis. Estimates of direct heritability for IGF-I concentration at d 28, 42, and 56 of the postweaning period, and for mean IGF-I concentration were .32, .59, .31, and .42, respectively. Direct heritabilities for carcass traits ranged from .27 to 1.0, .26 to 1.0, and .23 to 1.0 when the age-, fat-, and weight-constant end points, respectively, were used, with marbling score having the smallest heritability and longissimus muscle area having the highest heritability in each case. Maternal heritability and the proportion of phenotypic variance due to permanent environmental effect of dam generally were [is less than or equal to] .21 for IGF-I concentrations and for carcass traits other than longissimus muscle area. Additive genetic correlations of IGF-I concentrations with backfat thickness, longissimus muscle area, hot carcass weight, marbling score, quality grade, and yield grade averaged -.26, .19, -.04, -.53, -.45, and -.27, respectively, when carcass data were adjusted to an age-constant end point. Bulls with lower IGF-I concentrations had higher marbling scores and quality grades, but also had higher backfat thickness and yield grades regardless of the slaughter end point. Serum IGF-I concentration may be a useful selection criterion when efforts are directed toward improvement of marbling scores and quality grades of beef cattle. Key Words: Beef Cattle, Carcass Quality, Genetic Parameters, Insulin-Like Growth Factor, Selection

Individuals tend to over or underestimate their knowledge and abilities. This study assessed the aptitude of students enrolled in beginning, intermediate, and advanced Animal Sciences courses to accurately predict performance on knowledge-based tests. Both easy and difficult knowledge domains were tested, and predication accuracy was determined following manipulation of test order and performance expectation. Actual performance was greatest for the easy knowledge domain. Presenting the easy test second or with a performance expectation of C- resulted in lower actual scores (P<0.05). Actual scores for the difficult test did not differ among the testing scenarios, however, students underestimated performance when the difficult test was completed second and overestimated performance when the difficult test was presented first with a performance expectation of B+ (P<0.05). Overall, prediction accuracy was improved for tests completed second. Participants were grouped into quartiles according to actual performance and quartile rankings were considered indicative of skill level. Students in the bottom and upper quartiles were most accurate in predicting performance on the easy test. Performance for the difficult test was overestimated when the difficult test occurred first with a performance expectation of C- and underestimated when completed second with a performance expectation of C-. Findings provide evidence that self-assessment of performance is influenced by task difficulty, task order, and performance expectation contributing to bias in selfreported data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]