Search

Background: In 2014, the Hawaii Department of Education (DOE), the only statewide school system in the United States, predominately enrolled children (keiki) from underserved communities and lacked school nurses or a school health program. Chronic absenteeism due to health concerns was identified as a barrier to academic success. Methods: The DOE and a public university created Hawaii Keiki--Healthy and Ready to Learn (HK), a program to provide school-based services for 170 Title 1 schools in urban and rural settings and build momentum for statewide collective action. HK has maintained support from public and private entities to address student health. Results: This paper describes 5 years of program development, implementation, and continuing challenges. Most recently in 2020-2021, HK pivoted in the face of school campus closings due to COVID-19 with strategic plans, including telehealth, to move forward in this changed school environment. Conclusions: The HK program has increased awareness of students' needs and is addressing the imperative to build health services within public schools. The multipronged approach of building awareness of need, providing direct services, educating future care providers, and supporting sound policy development, has an impact that goes beyond any one individual area.

The article focuses on the Hawai‘i Interprofessional Education Workgroup (HIPE) and its efforts to facilitate interprofessional collaboration among health professional students from various University of Hawai‘i (UH) schools, particularly the Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy (DKICP). It mentions the outcomes of distance education initiatives, including telehealth simulations and telepresence robot-assisted exercises.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption in health care systems and may continue to do so. Nurses, the largest contingent of the nation's health care workforce, have borne the brunt of those disruptions, which have caused increased workload and resultant occupational stress. This study identified differences in nurses' occupational stress by practice specialty, time spent caring for patients with COVID-19, and nurses' demographic characteristics. A descriptive crosssectional online survey of RNs and APRNs (N=328) was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center on the island of O'ahu, Hawai'i in September and October of 2021. Participants completed the 57-item Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS). Nurses reported an average overall stress score of 2.11 out of 4. The ENSS subscales of workload, patients and their families, inadequate preparation, and uncertainty concerning treatment all had higher mean scores than the total scale. Nurses working in perioperative/procedural areas and obstetrics reported lower overall occupational stress scores than nurses in other specialties. Nurses who spent > 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 reported higher overall occupational stress scores than nurses who spent = 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 (F = 8.21, P < .001). Nurses over the age of 50 reported less stress than their younger counterparts (F = 5.75, P = .004). Understanding how occupational stress impacts acute care nurses can aid employers in allocating resources to address the problem, and thus improve workforce retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To better understand facilitators and barriers to implementation of quality improvement (QI) efforts, this study examined 2 evidence-based interventions, video laryngoscopy (VL)-assisted coaching, and apneic oxygenation (AO). One focus group with frontline clinicians was held at each of the 10 participating pediatric intensive care units. Qualitative analysis identified common and unique themes. Intervention fidelity was monitored with a priori defined success as >50% VL-assisted coaching or >80% AO use for 3 consecutive months. Eighty percent of intensive care units with VL-assisted coaching and 20% with AO met this criteria during the study period. Common facilitator themes were adequate device accessibility, having a QI culture, and strong leadership. Common barrier themes included poor device accessibility and perception of delay in care. A consistently identified theme in the successful sites was strong QI leadership, while unsuccessful sites consistently identified insufficient education. These facilitators and barriers should be proactively addressed during dissemination of these interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the article, the author discusses how health employers in Hawai'i envision the roles of population health nursing in the health care sector, particularly in addressing societal inequalities. Topics include how people with limited access to health care services and poor economic and living conditions suffered higher rates of COVID-19 infection, hospitalization and death, and nurses' role as promoters of interconnections between health and social care in communities.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has placed extraordinary strain on health care systems. This has led to increased stress among health care workers, and nurses in particular, which has had a negative impact on their physical and psychosocial wellbeing. This is likely to negatively impact the nursing workforce at the state and national levels as the pandemic continues. The purpose of this study was to assess whether nurses licensed in Hawai'i have considered leaving the workforce. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among Hawai'i nurses at all levels of licensure, with 421 responding. Of these nurses, 97 (23.0%) reported considering leaving the workforce, with safety (39.2%) and family/caregiver strain (32.0%) being the most common reasons. Reconsidering whether they should stay employed in their current roles (Odds ratio [OR] 2.05; 95% CI 1.56 - 2.69) and fear to continue providing direct patient care (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.54 - 2.54) were associated with increased odds of having considered leaving the workforce. Based on these results, the State of Hawai'i and local health care organizations need to adjust their nursing workforce estimates and address how to alleviate nurses' stressors and safety concerns to mitigate a potential workforce shortage. Research is needed to develop interventions to support and empower nurses in their current roles but also address future emergency preparedness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on health professionals, workers, and students called to action helping in slowing the spread of a disease about the minimal knowledge. Topics include extensive clinical experience and expertise in global health, public health, emergency response, and disaster management; and statewide organization representing hospitals, hospice, long-term care, and other healthcare organizations requiring health care students.

Purpose: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, holistic nurses at an academic level 1 trauma center in Hawaii utilized a novel holistic approach to combat stress and anxiety symptoms while promoting nurse's well-being. This assessment aimed to determine whether a brief session incorporating Reiki and meditation could decrease nurses' perceived stress and anxiety while increasing perceived happiness and coping ability. Methods: Two Reiki-certified holistic nurses developed a mobile 10-minute individual well-being session called "Zen Den." In each session, the holistic nurse provided hands-on Reiki concurrent with a meditation streamed by a free online application. Pre and post-self-assessments were measured using a Likert scale. Findings: Participants (N = 92) showed an average decrease in perceived stress by 46% and anxiety by 45%, and an increase in feelings of happiness by 17% and perceived coping ability by 18%. Conclusion: This novel approach to promote well-being in the workplace can be achieved using existing resources such as Reiki-trained staff, a quiet space, and a 10-minute well-being session with guided meditation using a free online application.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption in health care systems and may continue to do so. Nurses, the largest contingent of the nation's health care workforce, have borne the brunt of those disruptions, which have caused increased workload and resultant occupational stress. This study identified differences in nurses' occupational stress by practice specialty, time spent caring for patients with COVID-19, and nurses' demographic characteristics. A descriptive cross-sectional online survey of RNs and APRNs (N=328) was conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center on the island of O'ahu, Hawai'i in September and October of 2021. Participants completed the 57-item Expanded Nursing Stress Scale (ENSS). Nurses reported an average overall stress score of 2.11 out of 4. The ENSS subscales of workload, patients and their families, inadequate preparation, and uncertainty concerning treatment all had higher mean scores than the total scale. Nurses working in perioperative/procedural areas and obstetrics reported lower overall occupational stress scores than nurses in other specialties. Nurses who spent > 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 reported higher overall occupational stress scores than nurses who spent ≤ 50% of their time caring for patients with COVID-19 (F = 8.21, P < .001). Nurses over the age of 50 reported less stress than their younger counterparts (F = 5.75, P = .004). Understanding how occupational stress impacts acute care nurses can aid employers in allocating resources to address the problem, and thus improve workforce retention., Competing Interests: None of the authors identify a conflict of interest., (©Copyright 2023 by University Health Partners of Hawai‘i (UHP Hawai‘i).)

Objectives: To describe promoters and barriers to implementation of an airway safety quality improvement bundle from the perspective of interdisciplinary frontline clinicians and ICU quality improvement leaders., Design: Mixed methods., Setting: Thirteen PICUs of the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children network., Intervention: Remote or on-site focus groups with interdisciplinary ICU staff. Two semistructured interviews with ICU quality improvement leaders with quantitative and qualitative data-based feedbacks., Measurements and Main Results: Bundle implementation success (compliance) was defined as greater than or equal to 80% use for tracheal intubations for 3 consecutive months. ICUs were classified as early or late adopters. Focus group discussions concentrated on safety concerns and promoters and barriers to bundle implementation. Initial semistructured quality improvement leader interviews assessed implementation tactics and provided recommendations. Follow-up interviews assessed degree of acceptance and changes made after initial interview. Transcripts were thematically analyzed and contrasted by early versus late adopters. Median duration to achieve success was 502 days (interquartile range, 182-781). Five sites were early (median, 153 d; interquartile range, 146-267) and eight sites were late adopters (median, 783 d; interquartile range, 773-845). Focus groups identified common "promoter" themes-interdisciplinary approach, influential champions, and quality improvement bundle customization-and "barrier" themes-time constraints, competing paperwork and quality improvement activities, and poor engagement. Semistructured interviews with quality improvement leaders identified effective and ineffective tactics implemented by early and late adopters. Effective tactics included interdisciplinary quality improvement team involvement (early adopter: 5/5, 100% vs late adopter: 3/8, 38%; p = 0.08); ineffective tactics included physician-only rollouts, lack of interdisciplinary education, lack of data feedback to frontline clinicians, and misconception of bundle as research instead of quality improvement intervention., Conclusions: Implementation of an airway safety quality improvement bundle with high compliance takes a long time across diverse ICUs. Both early and late adopters identified similar promoter and barrier themes. Early adopter sites customized the quality improvement bundle and had an interdisciplinary quality improvement team approach.

Enteral tube placement in hospitalized neonates and young children is a common occurrence. Accurate placement and verification are imperative for patient safety. However, despite many years of research that provides evidence for a select few methods and clearly discredits the safety of others, significant variation in clinical practice is still common. Universal adoption and implementation of evidence-based practices for enteral tube placement and verification are necessary to ensure consistency and safety of all patients. This integrative review synthesizes current and seminal literature regarding the most accurate enteral tube placement and verification methods and proposes clinical practice recommendations.