Search

ObjectivesTo determine the incidence, impact, etiology, and methods for prevention of stroke after surgery of the thoracic aorta.MethodsA total of 317 thoracic aortic operations on 303 patients (194 male, 109 female) aged 13 to 87 years (mean 61 years) were reviewed. There were 218 procedures on the ascending aorta and arch and 99 on the descending aorta. Of the 218 procedures on the ascending aorta and arch, 86 involved cardiopulmonary bypass, 122 involved deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 2 involved antegrade cerebral perfusion, and 8 involved "clamp and sew" or left heart bypass. Of the 99 procedures on the descending aorta, 20 involved "clamp and sew," 69 involved left heart or full bypass, and 10 involved deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. A total of 206 cases were elective and 97 were emergency operations.ResultsTwenty-three (7.3%) of 317 patients had a stroke. Fifteen strokes occurred in operations on the ascending aorta and 8 in operations on the descending aorta (6.9% vs 8.1%; P =.703). Stroke occurred in 16 (16.5%) of 97 emergency operations and 7 (3.4%) of 206 elective operations (P =.001). In the 300 patients surviving the operation, stroke was a significant predictor of postoperative death (9/23 [39.1%] vs 23/277 [8.3%]; P =.001). Analysis of operative reports, brain images, and neurologic consultations revealed 15 of the 23 strokes were embolic, 3 were ischemic, 3 hemorrhagic, and 2 indeterminate. Patients with stroke had longer intensive care unit stays (18.4 vs 6.8 days; P =.0001), longer times to extubation (12.7 vs 3.8 days; P

Background: In May 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was introduced as a means of allocating donor lungs in order to decrease wait-list mortality and prioritize candidates based on medical urgency and posttransplant survival. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in recipient wait-list times and mean LAS since the introduction of the LAS model.Methods: The United Network for Organ Sharing provided de-identified patient-level data. The study population consisted of all patients in the United States with a reported LAS (n = 3529) undergoing lung transplantation between May 7, 2005 and November 7, 2007. The study period was divided into 6-month intervals. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in variables with nonparametric distributions. The nonparametric trends test was used to determine significance of trends over time.Results: There was a significant decrease in wait-list time during the study period, while LAS among transplant recipients increased (p < 0.001). There was no significant change in FVC (49.3 +/- 17.5%, p = 0.48) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (11.1 +/- 5.8 mm Hg, p = 0.23); however, there was a significant increase in age (51.5 +/- 13.9 years, p < 0.001) during the study period. When stratified by etiology, the LAS increased for both interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and COPD patients (p < 0.001). Moreover, the overall number of patients listed for transplantation as well as the LAS among transplant candidates increased (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Two years after initiation of the LAS model, wait-list times continue to decrease while mean LAS continued to increase. This increase in LAS among transplant recipients was observed most notably in patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and COPD, and reflected in an increased mean LAS at the time of listing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the clinical and demographic correlates of work skills and vocational outcome for persons with psychiatric disabilities. The same clinical, demographic, work skills, and vocational outcome instruments were administered to 275 persons working toward their vocational goals at three psychosocial rehabilitation centers. Data regarding vocational outcomes were collected quarterly over a period of 3 1/4 years. Using multivariate statistical techniques, clinical and demographic variables that predict work skills and future vocational outcomes were identified. The implications of the findings for program administrators, system planners, and researchers are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adverse events (AEs) experienced by children and adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) on ventricular assist devices (VADs) are sometimes unique to these populations. The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) and the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) aimed to harmonize definitions of pediatric and CHD AEs for use in clinical trials, registries, and regulatory evaluation. Data from the ACTION registry and adjudication committee were used to adapt general mechanical circulatory support ARC definitions. This ACTION-ARC international expert panel of trialists, clinicians, patients, families, statisticians, biomedical engineers, device developers, and regulatory agencies drafted and iterated definitions harmonized to ACTION data and existing literature during sessions conducted between December 2022 and May 2023, followed by dissemination across clinical/research audiences and professional organizations and further revision. Both email-linked, internet-based surveys and in-person discussions were used as a modified Delphi process. Nineteen AE types were identified and defined, including seven new event types and six event types that were deleted and will no longer be collected, achieving consensus. ACTION-ARC paired rigorous development with methodical stakeholder involvement and dissemination to define pediatric VAD AEs to facilitate assimilation of data across future clinical trials and evaluation of devices for VAD-supported children and adults with CHD., Competing Interests: Disclosure: A.L. is a consultant for Bayer, Abbott, Abiomed, Berlin Heart, and Syncardia and is the primary investigator for the Berlin ACTIVE driver trial. I.A. is a consultant for Abbott, Abiomed, Bivacor, and Berlin Heart. P.M.A.A. is Treasurer of the Board of Directors of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) and immediate past-chair of PediECMO, a research collaborative between ELSO and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators. P. Alexander’s institution received funding from the National Institutes of Health (NICHD R13HD104432) and the U.S. Department of Defense (U.S. DoD PRMRP Clinical Trial Award #W81XWH2210301). R.P.B. reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 HL153519 and is a member of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Board of Directors. S.B. is a full-time employee of Abiomed, Inc. a part of Johnson and Johnson. K.B. is an Abbott employee. J.C. receives an unrestricted education grant—from Abbott and is a medical monitor for Pumpkin Trial. R.R.D. is a paid consultant for Abbott, Inc. and Abiomed, Inc. R.L.K. is an employee at Abbott, Inc. R.K. is an employee at Berlin Heart Inc. M.K. is involved in Grants & Consulting for Medtronic, Abbott Vascular, Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, and Getinge. J.L. is a consultant for Abbott. D.L.S.M. is a consultant for Abbott Inc., Syncardia Inc., and Berlin Heart Inc. R.A.N. uses Berlin Heart of North America travel funds to attend the annual user’s group meeting. F.D.P. is a non-compensated ad-hoc scientific advisor for Abbott, BrioHealth Solutions, FineHeart, and Medtronic, a non-compensated medical monitor for Abiomed, a member—Data Safety Monitoring Board for Carmat, receives grant funding from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and receives partial salary support from Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan as Associate Director of the Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative. D.M.P. is on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for the Berlin Active Driver Trial. D.R. is associated with ACTION, DSMB for Parexel (unrelated to topic of AE manuscript), and Medicolegal consultation (unrelated to topic of AE manuscript). J.W.R. is a consultant for American Regent, AskBio, BioMarin, Bayer, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Enzyvant. E.S. reports institutional contracts for which he receives no direct compensation with Boston Scientific, Cardiawave, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Shanghai Microport Medical Co. Ltd., NVT GmBH, Pie Medical Imaging, Siemens Healthcare GmBH. M.E.S. is involved in a Medtronic educational contract, Octapharma advisory panel, and NIH DSMB for PumpKIN trial (completed). J.M.T. is a Berlin Heart CEC member. C.V. is on the Merck scientific advisory committee and a consultant for Abiomed. C.R.V. is a consultant for PTC therapeutics (previous), Antisense (current), and Capricor (current). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

We sought to develop and validate a new risk stratification score for mortality for children supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This retrospective, multicenter study used data from patients undergoing VAD implantation between April 2018 and February 2023 at 44 participating institutions in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes (ACTION) network. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards modeled mortality after VAD implantation. A total of 1,022 patients were enrolled. The 1 year mortality was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-23). The multivariable model was used to build the ACTION VADs risk stratification score with four components: ventilation, advanced organ support (dialysis or ECMO), diagnosis, and size (weight ≤5 kg). One point is added for each risk factor. Based on the sum of the risk factors, patients were classified into four classes: class 0-green (4% mortality at 1 year), class 1-yellow (16% mortality at 1 year), class 2-orange (21% mortality at 1 year), and class 3 or higher-red (42% mortality at 1 year). The score performed well, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and excellent calibration. The ACTION VADs score for mortality can be calculated easily and offers risk stratification and prognostic information for pediatric VAD candidates. This is the first validated risk assessment tool for pediatric mechanical circulatory support., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Background: In 2016, the United Network for Organ Sharing revised its pediatric heart transplant (HT) allocation policy., Objectives: This study sought to determine whether the 2016 revisions are associated with reduced waitlist mortality and capture patient-specific risks., Methods: Children listed for HT from 1999 to 2023 were identified using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data and grouped into 3 eras (era 1: 1999-2006; era 2: 2006-2016; era 3: 2016-2023) based on when the United Network for Organ Sharing implemented allocation changes. Fine-Gray competing risks modeling was used to identify factors associated with death or delisting for deterioration. Fixed-effects analysis was used to determine whether allocation changes were associated with mortality., Results: Waitlist mortality declined 8 percentage points (PP) across eras (21%, 17%, and 13%, respectively; P < 0.01). At listing, era 3 children were less sick than era 1 children, with 6 PP less ECMO use (P < 0.01), 11 PP less ventilator use (P < 0.01), and 1 PP less dialysis use (P < 0.01). Ventricular assist device (VAD) use was 13 PP higher, and VAD mortality decreased 9 PP (P < 0.01). Non-White mortality declined 10 PP (P < 0.01). ABO-incompatible listings increased 27 PP, and blood group O infant mortality decreased 13 PP (P < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the 2016 revisions were not associated with lower waitlist mortality, whereas VAD use (in era 3), ABO-incompatible transplant, improved patient selection, and narrowing racial disparities were. Match-run analyses demonstrated poor correlation between individual waitlist mortality risk and the match-run order., Conclusions: The 2016 allocation revisions were not independently associated with the decline in pediatric HT waitlist mortality. The 3-tier classification system fails to adequately capture patient-specific risks. A more flexible allocation system that accurately reflects patient-specific risks and considers transplant benefit is urgently needed., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

With continued medical and surgical advancements, most children and adolescents with congenital heart disease are expected to survive to adulthood. Chronic heart failure is increasingly being recognized as a major contributor to ongoing morbidity and mortality in this population as it ages, and treatment strategies to prevent and treat heart failure in the pediatric population are needed. In addition to primary myocardial dysfunction, anatomical and pathophysiological abnormalities specific to various congenital heart disease lesions contribute to the development of heart failure and affect potential strategies commonly used to treat adult patients with heart failure. This scientific statement highlights the significant knowledge gaps in understanding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, staging, and outcomes of chronic heart failure in children and adolescents with congenital heart disease not amenable to catheter-based or surgical interventions. Efforts to harmonize the definitions, staging, follow-up, and approach to heart failure in children with congenital heart disease are critical to enable the conduct of rigorous scientific studies to advance our understanding of the actual burden of heart failure in this population and to allow the development of evidence-based heart failure therapies that can improve outcomes for this high-risk cohort.

Background: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), supported by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs)., Methods: From September 19, 2012, to December 31, 2022, 1463 devices in 1219 patients aged <19 years were reported to the registry from 40 North American hospitals., Results: Cardiomyopathy remains the most common underlying etiology (59%), followed by congenital heart disease (26%) and myocarditis (8%). Implantable continuous devices were most common (39%) type, followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (28%) and paracorporeal continuous (27%) devices. At 6 months after VAD implantation, a favorable outcome (transplant, recovery, or alive on device) was achieved in 85% of patients, which was greatest among those on implantable continuous VADs (92%) and least for paracorporeal continuous VADs (68%), although the patient population supported on these devices is different., Conclusions: This Seventh Pedimacs Report demonstrates the continued importance of VADs in the treatment of children. With the complexity of cardiac physiologies and sizes of patients, multiple types of devices are used, including paracorporeal continuous, paracorporeal pulsatile, and implantable continuous devices. The preoperative risk factors and differences in patient populations may account for some of the differences in survival observed among these devices. This report, along with other collaborative work, continues to advance the care of this challenging and vulnerable population., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We sought to develop a contemporary risk assessment tool for use in pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) candidates to estimate risk for mortality on the device using readily available preimplantation clinical data. Training and testing datasets were created from Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) registry data on patients supported with a VAD from 2012 to 2021. Potential risk factors for mortality were assessed and incorporated into a simplified risk prediction model utilizing an open-source, gradient-boosted decision tree machine learning library, known as random forest. Predictive performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the testing dataset. Nine significant risk factors were included in the final predictive model which demonstrated excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.95. In addition to providing a framework for establishing pediatric-specific risk profiles, our model can help inform team expectations, guide optimal patient selection, and ultimately improve patient outcomes., Competing Interests: Disclosure: A.L. - Berlin Heart, Consultant and research Abbott, Consultant research, Medtronic Consultant, Abiomed Consultant, research Syncardia, Consultant Bayer research; R.R.D. - Consultant for Abbott; Farhan Zafar- TransMedics, Inc. Employed - Principal Cardiothoracic Procurement Surgeon; I.A. - Berlin Heart, Abbott, Medtronic, Abiomed, BiVACOR- Consultant and Proctor; other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2023.)

Background: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), supported by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs)., Methods: From September 19, 2012, to December 31, 2021, there were 1355 devices in 1109 patients (<19 years) from 42 North American Hospitals., Results: Cardiomyopathy was the most common underlying cause (59%), followed by congenital heart disease (25%) and myocarditis (9%). Regarding device type, implantable continuous (IC) VADs were most common at 40%, followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP; 28%) and paracorporeal continuous (PC; 26%). Baseline demographics differed, with the PC cohort being younger, smaller, more complex (ie, congenital heart disease), and sicker at implantation (P < .0001). At 6 months after VAD implantation, a favorable outcome (transplantation, recovery, or alive on device) was achieved in 84% of patients, which was greatest among those on IC VADs (92%) and least for PC VADs (69%). Adverse events were not uncommon, with nongastrointestinal bleeding (incidence of 14%) and neurologic dysfunction (11% [stroke, 4%]), within 2 weeks after implantation being the most prevalent. Stroke and bleeding had negative impacts on overall survival (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively)., Conclusions: This Sixth Pedimacs Report demonstrates the continued evolution of the pediatric field. The complexity of cardiac physiologies and anatomic constraint mandates the need for multiple types of devices used (PC, PP, IC). Detailed analyses of each device type in this report provide valuable information to further advance the care of this challenging and vulnerable population., (Copyright © 2023 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The field of pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support has expanded significantly over the past 20 years, with one third of pediatric heart transplant recipients currently being bridged to transplant with a VAD. Despite increased pediatric VAD utilization, however, there remains little formalized guidance for patient or device selection. The population of children with advanced heart failure is quite heterogeneous, and the available data suggest that VAD outcomes vary significantly based upon patient size, anatomy, level of illness, and type of device implanted. In an effort to better understand current practice patterns and identify populations for whom there does not appear to be a consensus approach to achieving optimal VAD outcomes, the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) has surveyed clinical decision-making among member sites and conducted a review of the available literature regarding patient population-specific VAD outcomes and center-specific practices related to patient and device selection. Rather than aiming to provide clinical guidelines, this document offers an overview of contemporary approaches to patient and device selection, highlighting specific populations for whom there is not a consensus approach to achieving reliably good VAD outcomes, as these populations may benefit most from future research and quality improvement efforts directed toward identifying best practice., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs)., Methods: From September 19, 2012, to December 31, 2020, 1229 devices in 1011 patients were reported to the registry from 47 North American Hospitals in patients aged younger than 19 years., Results: Cardiomyopathy was the most common underlying etiology (58%), followed by congenital heart disease (CHD; 25%) and myocarditis (10%). The most common devices implanted were implantable continuous (IC; 419 [41%]), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP; 269 [27%]), paracorporeal continuous (PC; 263 [26%]), and percutaneous (53 [5%]). Overall, at 6 months after VAD implantation, 83% had a positive outcome (transplant, explant, or alive on device). The freedom from stroke at 3 months was highest in IC VADs (93%), compared with PP VADs (84%) and with PC VADs (75%). There were differences in survival by device type, with patients on IC VADs having the best overall survival and those on PC having the lowest overall survival, though the patient populations being supported by each VAD type differed significantly from each other., Conclusions: This Fifth Pedimacs Report demonstrates the continued robust growth of VADs in the pediatric community, now with more than 1000 patients reported to the registry. The multiple available device types (PC, PP, IC) serve different populations with different pre-VAD risk profiles, which may account for differences in survival and adverse events between device types., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The congenital heart care community faces a myriad of public health issues that act as barriers toward optimum patient outcomes. In this article, we attempt to define advocacy and policy initiatives meant to spotlight and potentially address these challenges. Issues are organized into the following 3 key facets of our community: patient population, health care delivery, and workforce. We discuss the social determinants of health and health care disparities that affect patients in the community that require the attention of policy makers. Furthermore, we highlight the many needs of the growing adults with congenital heart disease and those with comorbidities, highlighting concerns regarding the inequities in access to cardiac care and the need for multidisciplinary care. We also recognize the problems of transparency in outcomes reporting and the promising application of telehealth. Finally, we highlight the training of providers, measures of productivity, diversity in the workforce, and the importance of patient-family centered organizations in advocating for patients. Although all of these issues remain relevant to many subspecialties in medicine, this article attempts to illustrate the unique needs of this population and highlight ways in which to work together to address important opportunities for change in the cardiac care community and beyond. This article provides a framework for policy and advocacy efforts for the next decade.

Mechanical support of patients with superior cavopulmonary connection is challenging; multiple factors contribute to failure: elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, aortopulmonary collateral flow, venovenous collaterals, ventricular dysfunction, and atrioventricular valve regurgitation. We report 2 cases of conversion from a single ventricle circulation to biventricular mechanical support by reestablishing caval continuity. Both patients have demonstrated recovery of end-organ function and participation in rehabilitation. This method of support results in improved systemic venous pressures and pulmonary blood flow compared with systemic mechanical circulatory support with a cavopulmonary connection and transfers some of the complexity of the transplant to the ventricular assist device implant., (Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Elective closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is usually recommended during preschool ages. However, ASD may contribute to deteriorating health in the presence of significant comorbidity and, thus, may need earlier closure. There is a lack of clarity regarding the indications for and outcomes after ASD closure in infancy and early childhood. We investigated the benefits and safety of surgical ASD closure in symptomatic patients under 2 years of age. Retrospective chart review was conducted in patients who underwent surgical ASD closure within the first 2 years of life. Of 31 symptomatic ASD patients, 22 had persistent respiratory symptoms, 24 failure to thrive, and 9 pulmonary hypertension. Overall, 26 patients (84.0%) showed clinical improvement after ASD closure, including improved respiratory status (17/22; 77.3%), resumption of normal growth (15/24; 62.5%), and resolution of pulmonary hypertension (7/7; 100%, 2 patients unable to assess postoperatively). Two medically complicated patients died a few months after surgery unrelated to surgical complications. Four out of 8 ventilator-dependent patients were weaned from mechanical ventilation within 1 month after ASD closure. Closure of ASD did not improve those patients with highly advanced lung disease and/or medically complex conditions including underlying genetic abnormalities. Surgical complications were uncommon. Postoperative hospital stay was 4 to 298 days (median 8 days). The majority of our patients demonstrated significant clinical improvement after ASD closure. Early ASD closure is safe and beneficial for symptomatic infants and young children with associated underlying pulmonary abnormalities, especially bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Background: The HeartMate 3 ventricular assist device (VAD) is a newer centrifugal continuous-flow VAD used for bridge-to-transplant and destination therapy in adults. However, there is limited experience regarding its use in children and adults with complex congenital heart disease (CHD)., Methods: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) is a multicenter learning network comprised of pediatric hospitals implanting VADs in children and adults with complex CHD. We examined the outcomes of patients undergoing HeartMate 3 implantation at an ACTION center between December 2017 and September 2019., Results: The HeartMate 3 was implanted in 35 patients at 9 ACTION centers, with a median age of 15.7 (8.8-47.3) years, median weight of 65.7 (19.1-114.1) kg, and median body surface area (BSA) of 1.74 (0.78-2.36) m 2 . Of the cohort, 14 patients (40%) weighed <60 kg. Diagnoses included dilated cardiomyopathy (63%), dilated cardiomyopathy in neuromuscular disease (20%), and CHD (17%). Of those with CHD, most had a Fontan circulation. With a median 78 days of follow-up, there was 1 death on device (97% survival); 20 out of 35 (57%) underwent transplantation with no post-transplantation mortality. There were no episodes of stroke or pump thrombosis., Conclusions: Use of the HeartMate 3 in ACTION centers was associated with a low incidence of mortality and adverse events. Patients as small as 19 kg (BSA 0.78 m 2 ) were successfully implanted and supported, indicating that this device may be appropriate for older children and small adults., (Copyright © 2020 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We aimed to review current literature on the discard rate of donor hearts offered to pediatric recipients and assess geographical differences. Consequences and ways to reduce the discard rate are discussed. A systemic review on published literature on pediatric transplantation published in English since 2010 was undertaken. Additionally, a survey was sent to international OPOs with the goal of incorporating responses from around the world providing a more global picture. Based on the literature review and survey, there is a remarkably wide range of discard and/or refusal for pediatric hearts offered for transplant, ranging between 18% and 57% with great geographic variation. The data suggest that that the overall refusal rate may have decreased over the last decade. Reasons for organ discard were difficult to identify from the available data. Although the refusal rate of pediatric donor hearts seems to be lower compared to that reported in adults, it is still as high as 57% with geographic variation., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Heart transplantation (HTx) is a treatment option for end-stage heart failure in children. HTx is limited by the availability and acceptability of donor hearts. Refusal of donor hearts has been reported to be common with reasons for refusal including preexisting donor characteristics. This review will focus on the impact of donor characteristics and comorbidities on outcomes following pediatric HTx. A literature review was performed to identify articles on donor characteristics and comorbidities and pediatric HTx outcomes. There are many donor characteristics to consider when accepting a donor heart. Weight-based matching is the most common form of matching in pediatric HTx with a donor-recipient weight ratio between 0.7 and 3 having limited impact on outcomes. From an age perspective, donors <50 years can be carefully considered, but the impact of ischemic time needs to be understood. To increase the donor pool, with minimal impact on outcomes, ABO-incompatible donors should be considered in patients that are eligible. Other factors to be considered when accepting an organ is donor comorbidities. Little is known about donor comorbidities in pediatric HTx, with most of the data available focusing on infections. Being aware of the potential infections in the donor, understanding the testing available and risks of transmission, and treatment options for the recipient is essential. There are a number of donor characteristics that potentially impact outcomes following pediatric HTx, but these need to be taken into consideration along with their interactions with recipient factors when interpreting the outcomes following HTx., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Heart transplantation has become standard of care for pediatric patients with either end-stage heart failure or inoperable congenital heart defects. Despite increasing surgical complexity and overall volume, however, annual transplant rates remain largely unchanged. Data demonstrating pediatric donor heart refusal rates of 50% suggest optimizing donor utilization is critical. This review evaluated the impact of donor characteristics surrounding the time of death on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes., Methods: An extensive literature review was performed to identify articles focused on donor characteristics surrounding the time of death and their impact on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes., Results: Potential pediatric heart transplant recipient institutions commonly receive data from seven different donor death-related categories with which to determine organ acceptance: cause of death, need for CPR, serum troponin, inotrope exposure, projected donor ischemia time, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic results. Although DITs up to 8 hours have been reported with comparable recipient outcomes, most data support minimizing this period to <4 hours. CVA as a cause of death may be associated with decreased recipient survival but is rare in the pediatric population. Otherwise, however, in the setting of an acceptable donor heart with a normal echocardiogram, none of the other data categories surrounding donor death negatively impact pediatric heart transplant recipient survival., Conclusions: Echocardiographic evaluation is the most important donor clinical information following declaration of brain death provided to potential recipient institutions. Considering its relative importance, every effort should be made to allow direct image visualization., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Cardiac transplantation for children with end-stage cardiac disease with no other medical or surgical options is now standard. The number of children in need of cardiac transplant continues to exceed the number of donors considered "acceptable." Therefore, there is an urgent need to understand which recipients are in greatest need of transplant before becoming "too ill" and which "marginal" donors are acceptable in order to reduce waitlist mortality. This article reviewed primarily pediatric studies reported over the last 15 years on waitlist mortality around the world for the various subgroups of children awaiting heart transplant and discusses strategies to try to reduce the cardiac waitlist mortality., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Optimal management of pediatric cardiac donors is essential in order to maximize donor heart utilization and minimize the rate of discarded organs. This review was performed after a systematic literature review and gives a detailed overview on current practices and guidelines. The review focuses on optimal monitoring of pediatric donors, donor workup, hormonal replacement, and obliterating the adverse effects of brain death. The current evidence on catecholamine support and thyroid hormone replacement is also discussed. Recognizing and addressing this shall help in a standardized approach toward donor management and optimal utilization of pediatric heart donors organs., (© 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The high discard rate of pediatric donor hearts presents a major challenge for children awaiting heart transplantation. Recent literature identifies several factors that contribute to the disparities in pediatric donor heart usage, including regulatory oversight, the absence of guidelines on pediatric donor heart acceptance, and variation among transplant programs. However, a likely additional contributor to this issue are the behavioral factors influencing transplant team decisions in donor offer scenarios, a topic that has not yet been studied in detail. Behavioral economics and decision psychology provide an excellent foundation for investigating decision-making in the pediatric transplant setting, offering key insights into the behavior of transplant professionals. We conducted a systematic review of published literature in pediatric heart transplant related to behavioral economics and the psychology of decision-making. In this review, we draw on paradigms from these two domains in order to examine how existing aspects of the transplant environment, including regulatory oversight, programmatic variation, and allocation systems, may precipitate potential biases surrounding donor offer decisions. Recognizing how human decision behavior influences donor acceptance is a first step toward improving utilization of potentially viable pediatric donor hearts., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Donor organ acceptance practices vary among pediatric heart transplant professionals. We sought to understand what is known about the interactions between the "high-risk" recipient and the "marginal donor," and how donor risk scores can impact this discussion., Methods: A systematic review of published literature on pediatric HTx was undertaken with the assistance of a medical librarian. Two authors independently assessed search results, and papers were reviewed for inclusion., Results: We found that there are a large number of individual factors, and clusters of factors, that have been used to label individual recipients "high-risk" and individual donors "marginal." The terms "high-risk recipient" and "marginal donor" have been used broadly in the literature making it virtually impossible to make comparisons between publications. In general, the data support that patients who could be easily agreed to be "sicker recipients" are at more risk compared to those who are clearly "healthier," albeit still "sick enough" to need transplantation. Given this variability in the literature, we were unable to define how being a "high-risk" recipient interplays with accepting a "marginal donor." Existing risk scores are described, but none were felt to adequately predict outcomes from factors available at the time of offer acceptance., Conclusions: We could not determine what makes a donor "marginal," a recipient "high-risk," or how these factors interplay within the specific recipient-donor pair to determine outcomes. Until there are better risk scores predicting outcomes at the time of organ acceptance, programs should continue to evaluate each organ and recipient individually., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)