Search

Epidural analgesia involves injection of anesthetics into the epidural space, using a Touhy needle to proceed through the layers in the epidural region and a "loss of resistance" (LOR) syringe to sense the environment stiffness. The anesthesiologist's case experience is one of the leading causes of accidental dural puncture and failed epidural - the two most common complications of epidural analgesia. Robotic simulation is an appealing solution to help train novices in this task. Another benefit of it is the ability to record the kinematic information throughout the procedure. In this work, we used a haptic bimanual simulator, that we designed and validated in previous work, to explore the effect LOR probing strategies had on procedure outcomes. Our results indicate that most participants probed more with the LOR syringe in successful trials, compared to unsuccessful trials. Furthermore, this result was more prominent in the three layers preceding the epidural space. Our findings can assist in creating better instructions for training novices in the task of epidural analgesia. We posit that instructing anesthesia residents to use the LOR syringe more extensively and educating them to do so more when they are in proximity to the epidural space can help improve skill acquisition in this task., Comment: 3 pages, 4 figures

The case experience of anesthesiologists is one of the leading causes of accidental dural punctures and failed epidurals - the most common complications of epidural analgesia used for pain relief during delivery. We designed a bimanual haptic simulator to train anesthesiologists and optimize epidural analgesia skill acquisition. We present an assessment study conducted with 22 anesthesiologists of different competency levels from several Israeli hospitals. Our simulator emulates the forces applied to the epidural (Touhy) needle, held by one hand, and those applied to the Loss of Resistance (LOR) syringe, held by the other one. The resistance is calculated based on a model of the epidural region layers parameterized by the weight of the patient. We measured the movements of both haptic devices and quantified the results' rate (success, failed epidurals, and dural punctures), insertion strategies, and the participants' answers to questionnaires about their perception of the simulation realism. We demonstrated good construct validity by showing that the simulator can distinguish between real-life novices and experts. Face and content validity were examined by studying users' impressions regarding the simulator's realism and fulfillment of purpose. We found differences in strategies between different level anesthesiologists, and suggest trainee-based instruction in advanced training stages., Comment: 12 pages, 9 figures