Search

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle is based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle” developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed, and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus, 51%–74%; strong consensus, 75%–99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 11 statements on terminology and classification reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Definitions are provided for osseous, chondral and osteochondral lesions, as well as bone marrow stimulation and injury chronicity, among others. An osteochondral lesion of the talus can be abbreviated as OLT. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the appropriate terminology for osteochondral lesions of the ankle.

Effective treatment of postoperative pain after elective surgery remains elusive, and the experience of pain can be variable for patients. The patient's intrinsic pain tolerance may contribute to this variability. We sought to identify whether there was a correlation between subjective report of intrinsic pain tolerance and objective measurement of pressure dolorimetry (PD). We also sought to identify whether a correlation existed between PD and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores of pain intensity, physical function, and mood. PD is a validated, objective method to assess pain tolerance. Markers of general mental and physical health are correlated with pain sensitization and may also be linked to pain tolerance.PROMIS scores, dolorimetry measurements, and survey data were collected on 40 consecutive orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery patients at the initial clinic visit. Patients were included if they had normal sensation on the plantar foot and no prior surgery or plantar heel source of pain.Objective dolorimetry data reflecting 5/10 pain for the patients were 24 N/cm2 (±8.9). Patients estimated their pain threshold as 7.3/10 (±2.1). No correlation was found between objective and subjective pain threshold identified. A moderate negative correlation of R = -0.44 was observed regarding PROMIS-M with dolorimetry data (P-0.05). PROMIS-M score60 had a significant decrease in pain threshold to 15.9 ± 8.5 N/cm2 compared with 25.7 ± 8.9 N/cm2 for those who were less depressed with a PROMIS60 (P0.05).Subjective pain tolerance is not correlated with the patient's own objective pain threshold or markers of mental health and should not be used to assist clinical decision making. PROMIS-M is inversely correlated with objective pain. Higher PROMIS-M scores are associated with a lower objective pain threshold.Level II-Lesser Quality Randomized Controlled Trial or Prospective Comparative Study.

Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Pediatric Ankle Cartilage Lesions” developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Forty-three international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 20 countries convened to participate in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within four working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterised as follows: consensus: 51–74%; strong consensus: 75–99%; unanimous: 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on paediatric ankle cartilage lesions reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Five achieved unanimous support, and seven reached strong consensus (>75% agreement). All statements reached at least 84% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with the management of paediatric ankle cartilage lesions.

Background: An international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to present the consensus statements on osteochondral lesions of the tibial plafond (OLTP) and on ankle instability with ankle cartilage lesions developed at the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Forty-three experts in cartilage repair of the ankle were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 4 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held. Results: A total of 11 statements on OLTP reached consensus. Four achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). A total of 8 statements on ankle instability with ankle cartilage lesions reached consensus during the 2019 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support, and seven reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). Conclusion: These consensus statements may assist clinicians in the management of these difficult clinical pathologies. Level of Evidence: Level V, mechanism-based reasoning.

There is a wide variety of treatments for disruption of the syndesmosis. There is also controversy as to which device should be used for fixation of the syndesmosis, how many devices should be used, how many cortices the screws should engage, and whether, when, and where the screws should be removed. We conducted a study to determine how orthopedic surgeons manage these injuries. In a survey, we asked orthopedic trauma and foot and ankle fellowship directors and members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society how they routinely treated the syndesmotic injury component of Danis-Weber type C or Lauge-Hansen pronation-external rotation type IV ankle fractures. The overall response rate was 50% (77/153). Fifty-one percent of respondents routinely used 3.5-mm cortical screws, 24% routinely used 4.5-mm cortical screws, and 14% routinely used a suture fixation device. Forty-four percent of respondents routinely used 1 screw, 44% routinely used 2 screws, and the rest were undecided between 1 and 2 screws. Twenty-nine percent of respondents engaged 3 cortices with syndesmotic screws, and 67% engaged 4 cortices. Syndesmotic screws were routinely removed 65% of the time and left in place 35% of the time. Routine removal of syndesmotic screws was done in the operating room in 95% of cases; it was done at 3 months in 49% of cases, at 4 months in 37%, and at 6 months in 12%. The most common method for treating syndesmotic injuries was through use of 3.5-mm screws engaging 4 cortices routinely removed in the operating room at 3 months. Number of screws used to fix the syndesmosis, either 1 or 2, was evenly split.