1. Sortition As a Means to Fight Corruption
- Author
-
David Litvak
- Subjects
Power (social and political) ,Politics ,Jury ,NOMINATE ,Corruption ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Political science ,Law ,Commission ,Sortition ,Democracy ,media_common ,Law and economics - Abstract
Electoral democracy is in crisis. The use of sortition in our political systems could be a key to renewing and deepening democracy. But how to do so? And where to start? In this paper, I explore the idea that using sortition to address the problem of corruption could be a first step. Why? For two reasons. First, corruption of elected officials is an internal inconsistency of electoral democracy – it cannot be resolved adequately through electoral institutions. Second, there is also a large consensus on the fact – everybody agrees – that corruption is a problem. I suggest granting the power to convene an Investigation Commission to a randomly selected citizen body. This body should also nominate the Commission’s head and receive its recommendations. I also discuss the idea of a Citizens’ Court to directly address the problem of corruption of elected officials. This broad jury would judge and sanction corrupted elected officials. Taking Quebec’s ongoing corruption saga as an example, I also try to see how the system would work in reality and, finally, where the system, once put into place, could lead to.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF