Search

Loss of function of senataxin (SETX), a bona-fide RNA/DNA helicase, is associated with neuronal degeneration leading to Ataxia and Ocular Apraxia (AOA) in human patients. SETX is proposed to promote transcription termination, DNA replication, DNA repair, and to unwind deleterious RNA:DNA hybrids in the genome. In all the above-mentioned mechanisms, SETX unwinds transcription complex-associated nascent RNA which is then degraded by the RNA exosome complex. Here we have used B cells isolated from a SETX mutant mouse model and compared genomic instability and immunoglobulin heavy chain locus (IgH) class switch recombination (CSR) to evaluate aberrant and programmed genomic rearrangements, respectively. Similar to RNA exosome mutant primary B cells, SETX mutant primary B cells display genomic instability but a modest decrease in efficiency of CSR. Furthermore, knockdown of Setx mRNAs from CH12–F3 B-cell lines leads to a defect in IgA CSR and accumulation of aberrant patterns of mutations in IgH switch sequences. Given that SETX mutant mice do not recapitulate the AOA neurodegenerative phenotype, it is possible that some aspects of SETX biology are rescued by redundant helicases in mice. Overall, our study provides new insights into the role of the SETX/RNA exosome axis in suppressing genomic instability so that programmed DNA breaks are properly orchestrated., Biological sciences; Immunology; Genetics; Biochemistry; Molecular biology; RNA exosome, Senataxin, DNA/RNA hybrids, Class switch recombination

SummaryWe have ablated the cellular RNA degradation machinery in differentiated B cells and pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs) by conditional mutagenesis of core (Exosc3) and nuclear RNase (Exosc10) components of RNA exosome and identified a vast number of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) with emergent functionality. Unexpectedly, eRNA-expressing regions accumulate R-loop structures upon RNA exosome ablation, thus demonstrating the role of RNA exosome in resolving deleterious DNA/RNA hybrids arising from active enhancers. We have uncovered a distal divergent eRNA-expressing element (lncRNA-CSR) engaged in long-range DNA interactions and regulating IgH 3′ regulatory region super-enhancer function. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated ablation of lncRNA-CSR transcription decreases its chromosomal looping-mediated association with the IgH 3′ regulatory region super-enhancer and leads to decreased class switch recombination efficiency. We propose that the RNA exosome protects divergently transcribed lncRNA expressing enhancers by resolving deleterious transcription-coupled secondary DNA structures, while also regulating long-range super-enhancer chromosomal interactions important for cellular function.

Programmed mutagenesis of the immunoglobulin locus of B lymphocytes during class switch recombination (CSR) and somatic hypermutation requires RNA polymerase II (polII) transcription complex-dependent targeting of the DNA mutator activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID). AID deaminates cytidine residues on substrate sequences in the immunoglobulin (Ig) locus via a transcription-dependent mechanism, and this activity is stimulated by the RNA polII stalling cofactor Spt5 and the 11-subunit cellular noncoding RNA 3′–5′ exonucleolytic processing complex RNA exosome. The mechanism by which the RNA exosome recognizes immunoglobulin locus RNA substrates to stimulate AID DNA deamination activity on its in vivo substrate sequences is an important question. Here we report that E3-ubiquitin ligase Nedd4 destabilizes AID-associated RNA polII by a ubiquitination event, leading to generation of 3′ end free RNA exosome RNA substrates at the Ig locus and other AID target sequences genome-wide. We found that lack of Nedd4 activity in B cells leads to accumulation of RNA exosome substrates at AID target genes and defective CSR. Taken together, our study links noncoding RNA processing following RNA polII pausing with regulation of the mutator AID protein. Our study also identifies Nedd4 as a regulator of noncoding RNAs that are generated by stalled RNA polII genome-wide.

The distribution of sense and antisense strand DNA mutations on transcribed duplex DNA contributes to the development of immune and neural systems along with the progression of cancer. Because developmentally matured B cells undergo biologically programmed strand-specific DNA mutagenesis at focal DNA/RNA hybrid structures, they make a convenient system to investigate strand-specific mutagenesis mechanisms. We demonstrate that the sense and antisense strand DNA mutagenesis at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus and some other regions of the B cell genome depends upon localized RNA processing protein complex formation in the nucleus. Both the physical proximity and coupled activities of RNA helicase Mtr4 (and Senataxin) with the noncoding RNA processing function of RNA exosome determine the strand specific distribution of DNA mutations. Our study suggests that strand-specific DNA mutagenesis-associated mechanisms will play major roles in other undiscovered aspects of organismic development.

Methylation of DNA has evolved across many organisms as an epigenetic marker typically associated with transcriptional repression. As cells develop, their epigenetic profile changes to reflect their differentiated state, with the promoters of genes to be silenced getting methylated, and the promoters of genes whose expression is required losing their methylation. Although a significant amount of insight has been gained in the mechanisms of DNA methylation, those of active DNA demethylation are yet to be determined. It has long been postulated that replication-dependent "passive" DNA demethylation is one route of transcriptional regulation. In addition, recent studies suggest that the DNA deamination activity of Apo-lipoprotein B (APOBEC) family member Activation Induced cytidine Deaminase (AID) determines genomic DNA methylation patterns. Here, we discuss the evidence and the arguments regarding AID function in DNA demethylation. Understanding how methylation and demethylation are established and regulated is crucial for at least two reasons. First, some diseases, exhibit a change in their epigenetic profile due to DNA methylation dysregulation. Second, considerable efforts have been expended in the reprogramming of somatic cells to give rise to other cell types. The substantial therapeutic advantages that would result from such technology are invaluable, but they have been hampered in part by our inability to fully understand how DNA demethylation occurs.