Search

Objective: A rare complication of transvaginal synthetic mesh kits is bladder mesh extrusion. Treatment options include abdominal or vaginal surgical mesh excision or endoscopic mesh vaporization. There are very few published studies detailing endoscopic management. This unique case describes how repeated endoscopic mesh vaporization may be required as mesh extrusion may progress. Methods: A 71-year old female with a history of pelvic organ prolapse managed with an anterior transvaginal mesh kit presented years later with persistent urgency incontinence and recurrent acute cystitis. Cystoscopy eventually revealed bladder calculi adherent to extruded mesh. The stones and extruded mesh were vaporized using the Holmium laser on three occasions over 3 years. Results: Our approach offered a minimally invasive technique with short recovery, no use of a catheter post-operatively and maintained original prolapse repair; however, these patients may be at risk of mesh extrusion recurrence. Conclusion: Bladder extrusion of transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse kit mesh is thankfully a rare complication. With no current consensus for treatment of bladder mesh extrusion, the decision to perform complete mesh excision versus endoscopic treatment should be based on the degree and location of the extrusion, the risk of major complications, mesh extrusion recurrence and the patient’s desired outcomes, including recovery time and risk for prolapse recurrence. Endoscopic vaporization of extruded pelvic organ prolapse mesh likely has a higher recurrence rate than vaginal or abdominal excision. The risks and benefits are important to discuss during counseling and informed consent in these difficult cases. Level of evidence: 4

To assess the efficacy and safety of circumferential cremasteric lysis in the treatment of adult symptomatic retractile testicles.This is a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone circumferential cremasteric lysis at a single institution performed by a single surgeon between January 2010 and December 2011. We evaluated the etiology, pre- and postoperative pain intensity, postoperative pain alleviation, and any surgical complications. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare pain levels before and at last follow-up after surgery.Eight patients (mean age, 31.5 ± 10.60; range, 22-51 years) underwent circumferential cremasteric lysis. The procedure resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant difference in postoperative pain intensity. The mean pain levels decreased from 5.6 (preoperatively) to 1.5 (at last follow-up) (5.6 vs 1.5, P .01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The mean follow-up was 21.63 ± 13.70 months (range, 9-50 months). Four patients (50%) reported complete resolution and four (50%) reported partial resolution of their testicular pain at last follow-up.In this limited retrospective study, we demonstrated that circumferential lysis of the cremasteric muscle through a small subinguinal incision is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for physical activity-precipitated painful retractile testicular pain.

Objective Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an established adjunctive surgical intervention for treating Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms. Both surgical targets, the globus pallidus interna (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN), appear equally beneficial when treating motor symptoms but effects on nonmotor symptoms are not clear. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a common PD complaint. Given prior data in STN-DBS, we aimed to further explore potential benefits in LUTS in both targets. Methods We performed a prospective, nonblinded clinical trial evaluating LUTS in PD patients in both targets pre and post DBS using validated urologic surveys. Participants were already slated for DBS and target selection predetermined before study entry. LUTS was evaluated using: the American Urological Association (AUA-SI), Quality of Life score (QOL), Overactive Bladder 8 Questionnaire (OAB-q), and Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM). Results Of 33 participants, 20 underwent STN DBS and 13 had GPi DBS. Patients demonstrated moderate baseline LUTS. The urologic QOL score significantly improved post DBS (3.24 ± 1.77vs. 2.52 ± 1.30; p = 0.03). Analyzed by target, only the STN showed significant change in QOL (3.20 ± 1.61 vs 2.25 ± 1.33; p = 0.04). There were no other significant differences in urologic scores post DBS noted in either target. Conclusion In PD patients with moderate LUTS, there were notable improvements in QOL for LUTS post DBS in the total sample and STN target. There may be differences in DBS effects on LUTS between targets but this will require further larger, blinded studies.