Search

We sought to determine whether detection of cartilage invasion (CI) by computed tomography predicts oncologic outcomes after primary total laryngectomy.Retrospective cohort study comparing oncologic outcomes between radiologic versus pathologic diagnosis.Assessment of clear CI versus gestalt CI resulted in 84% versus 48% specificity, 90.9% versus 80.3% positive predictive value (PPV), 60.6% versus 80.3% sensitivity, 44.7% versus 48% negative predictive value (NPV), respectively. Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between cT4a and cT3/cT2 patients (p = 0.87). DFS trended towards superiority among pT3/pT2 versus pT4a patients (p = 0.18). DFS was similar among patients with CI on radiologist gestalt versus no CI (p = 0.94). Histologically confirmed CI was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.46 (p = 0.27), gestalt CI 1.13 (p = 0.70), and clear CI 1.61 (p = 0.10) for DFS.Gestalt determination of CI results in high sensitivity but low specificity, while clear determination of CI results in moderate sensitivity and high specificity.

Adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT), with high-dose cisplatin remains standard treatment for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) with high-risk pathologic features. We evaluated outcomes associated with different cisplatin dosing and schedules, concurrent with radiation (RT), and the effect of cumulative dosing of cisplatin. An IRB-approved collaborative database of patients (pts) with primary OCSCC (Stage I–IVB AJCC 7th edition) treated with primary surgical resection between January 2005 and January 2015, with or without adjuvant therapy, was established from six academic institutions. Patients were categorized by cisplatin dose and schedule, and resultant groups compared for demographic data, pathologic features, and outcomes by statistical analysis to determine disease free survival (DFS) and freedom from metastatic disease (DM). From a total sample size of 1282 pts, 196 pts were identified with high-risk features who were treated with adjuvant CRT. Administration schedule of cisplatin was not significantly associated with DFS. On multivariate (MVA), DFS was significantly better in patients without perineural invasion (PNI) and in those receiving ≥200 mg/m2 cisplatin dose (p &lt, 0.001 and 0.007). Median DFS, by cisplatin dose, was 10.5 (&lt, 200 mg/m2) vs. 20.8 months (≥200 mg/m2). Our analysis demonstrated cumulative cisplatin dose ≥200 mg/m2 was associated with improved DFS in high-risk resected OCSCC pts.

Definitive treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) is often compromised in older adults due to concerns about potential treatment toxicity intolerance. We reviewed our institutional experience with definitive management of older adults with LAHNSCC.From our Institutional Review Board-approved registry, we identified patients aged60 years with stage III-IV, M0 LAHNSCC (seventh/earlier editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification) treated with definitive radiotherapy from 1993-2019. Indications for concurrent chemotherapy included T3-4 or N2-3 disease. Multivariable analysis using Fine and Gray regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with recurrence. The cumulative incidence method was used to calculate recurrence rates.Overall, 350 patients were identified: 223 aged 60-69, 82 aged 70-74, and 45 aged ≥75 years. Median follow-up was 36.3 months. Two-year recurrence rates were 13.7%, 20.2% and 34.8%, respectively; human papillomavirus-positive disease was present in 190 (85%), 44 (54%), and 25 (56%), respectively; and systemic therapy was given to 194 (87%), 64 (88%), and 23 (56%) patients, respectively. Factors significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence included age ≥75 years, Karnofsky performance status 70-80, clinical N2c-N3, and Charlson score 2-3.Patients aged ≥75 years received less aggressive therapy and experienced increased recurrence compared to younger patients. Outcomes for those aged 70-74 years were similar to younger patients treated with aggressive therapy, despite their inferior performance status/comorbidity, and such patients should not routinely be excluded from standard-of-care therapy. Further study is needed to optimize therapy for a redefined older adult (age ≥75 years) population.

Organ preservation (OP) treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer has increased compared to primary total laryngectomy. Our study compares oncologic and functional outcomes between these approaches.Retrospective cohort study.Single tertiary care institution.Retrospective review of patients receiving primary total laryngectomy or OP for laryngeal cancer between 1/1/2000 and 12/31/2018.A total of 118 patients received primary total laryngectomy and 119 received OP. Overall survival was similar between total laryngectomy and OP. When stratified by T stage, disease-free survival was worse among T3 patients receiving OP versus total laryngectomy. In T3 patients, 28 OP patients experienced local recurrence (28.9%) compared to 3 total laryngectomy patients (7.1%; p 0.01). In total, 20 OP patients with local recurrence received salvage surgery. These patients had similar overall survival to patients who underwent initial total laryngectomy (TL). About 14 OP patients with local recurrence did not receive salvage surgery. About 89 (75.4%) TL patients achieved normal diet as compared to 64 (53.8%) OP patients (p 0.001). In TL patients, 106 (89.8%) received primary or secondary tracheoesophageal-prosthesis, 82 (77.4%) of whom achieved completely understandable speech.There was no difference in survival by treatment in T4 patients, possibly because of strict patient selection. However, disease-free survival was worse in T3 patients receiving OP, likely due to a high local recurrence rate. Approximately 40% of patients with local recurrence were not eligible for salvage laryngectomy. TL patients had comparable swallowing and speech outcomes with OP patients.3 Laryngoscope, 2022.

Background De-intensified treatment strategies for early human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) rely on selecting patients with an excellent prognosis. The criterion for enrollment in current de-intensification trials is ≤10 pack-years. More nuance to the pack-year criteria may expand enrollment, improve patient outcomes, and prevent overtreatment. It was hypothesized that patients with more than 10 pack-years may experience favorable outcomes if smoking cessation has been achieved. Methods From an institutional review board-approved database, patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma treated definitively with radiation with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively identified. Patients with a history of smoking who were eligible for national de-intensification trials were included (cT1-2N1-2b or T3N0-2b [American Joint Committee on Cancer, seventh edition]). Cox regression with penalized smoothing splines was used to evaluate nonlinear effects of cessation. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to objectively search for relationships between the 2 colinear variables (pack-years and time since cessation). Results Among 330 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 130 (40%) were never smokers, 139 (42%) were former smokers, and 61 (18%) were current smokers. With standard therapy, all former smokers achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) rate higher than 91%, regardless of pack-year exposure. Nonlinear Cox regression demonstrated that more recent cessation was associated with significantly worse PFS even among those with ≤20 pack-years. RPA demonstrated that only current smokers experienced a 2-year PFS rate lower than 91%; former smokers, regardless of pack-years, experienced a 2-year PFS rate higher than 91%. Conclusions The 10-pack-year rule may not apply to all early HPV+ OPCs, particularly for former smokers. Future randomized de-intensification trials should consider a broader and more nuanced approach until the predictive role of smoking status is established.

To investigate the association between tumor volume and locoregional failure (LRF) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) for locally advanced larynx cancer (LC).This is a retrospective cohort study from 2009 to 2014 identified from an institutional review board-approved registry. Fifty-nine of 68 patients with locally advanced larynx cancer treated with definitive CCRT who had available imaging for review were identified. The main endpoint to be assessed was the association between gross tumor volumes (GTV; T = total, P = primary, N = nodal) and LRF. Receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves were used to investigate diagnostic accuracy.Twenty LRFs were observed, resulting in a 2-year LRF rate of 39% (95% CI, 23-52%). On UVA, the GTV-T (P = .01), GTV-P (P = .05), and GTV-N (P = .04) were statistically significant predictors of LRF. Furthermore, age, smoking status, N-stage, larynx subsite, and tracheostomy/feeding tube dependence were potentially associated with LRF (P .3), whereas T-stage (T3-4 vs. T2) was not (HR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.38-2.91, P = .92). In the multivariable model, GTV-P (HR 1.022, 95% CI, 0.999-1.046, P = .07) and GTV-N (HR 1.053, 95% CI, 1.0004-1.108, P = .05) were the two most impactful covariates on the model's RGTV is associated with LRF after definitive CCRT for LC. Patients with bulky primary and/or nodal tumors may be better served with upfront surgical resection regardless of T-stage. Further investigation into the safety of larynx preservation for low-volume T4 tumors can be considered.4 Laryngoscope, 130:2372-2377, 2020.

BACKGROUND We investigated the impact of level I lymph node involvement (LNI) on survival for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). METHODS We performed a cohort study of patients with OPSCC who underwent resection with known human papillomavirus (HPV) status in the National Cancer Database (2010-2014). RESULTS Among 5591 patients with OPSCC, 599 (10.7%) had level I LNI. Predictors of level I LNI included pT classification (pT3 vs pT1; odds ratio [OR], 1.95; P

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has excellent control rates compared to nonvirally associated OPSCC. Multiple trials are actively testing whether de-escalation of treatment intensity for these patients can maintain oncologic equipoise while reducing treatment-related toxicity. We have developed OP-TIL, a biomarker that characterizes the spatial interplay between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and surrounding cells in histology images. Herein, we sought to test whether OP-TIL can segregate stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients into low-risk and high-risk groups and aid in patient selection for de-escalation clinical trials. Methods Association between OP-TIL and patient outcome was explored on whole slide hematoxylin and eosin images from 439 stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients across 6 institutional cohorts. One institutional cohort (n = 94) was used to identify the most prognostic features and train a Cox regression model to predict risk of recurrence and death. Survival analysis was used to validate the algorithm as a biomarker of recurrence or death in the remaining 5 cohorts (n = 345). All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results OP-TIL separated stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients with 30 or less pack-year smoking history into low-risk (2-year disease-free survival [DFS] = 94.2%; 5-year DFS = 88.4%) and high-risk (2-year DFS = 82.5%; 5-year DFS = 74.2%) groups (hazard ratio = 2.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.52 to 4.32; P Conclusions OP-TIL can identify stage I HPV-associated OPSCC patients likely to be poor candidates for treatment de-escalation. Following validation on previously completed multi-institutional clinical trials, OP-TIL has the potential to be a biomarker, beyond clinical stage and HPV status, that can be used clinically to optimize patient selection for de-escalation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with p16(+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) are potentially cured with definitive treatment. However, there are currently no reliable biomarkers of treatment failure for p16(+) OPSCC. Pathologist-based visual assessment of tumor cell multinucleation (MN) has been shown to be independently prognostic of disease-free survival (DFS) in p16(+) OPSCC. However, its quantification is time intensive, subjective, and at risk of interobserver variability. METHODS: We present a deep-learning–based metric, the multinucleation index (MuNI), for prognostication in p16(+) OPSCC. This approach quantifies tumor MN from digitally scanned H&E-stained slides. Representative H&E-stained whole-slide images from 1094 patients with previously untreated p16(+) OPSCC were acquired from 6 institutions for optimization and validation of the MuNI. RESULTS: The MuNI was prognostic for DFS, overall survival (OS), or distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS) in p16(+) OPSCC, with HRs of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.37–2.30), 1.94 (1.44–2.60), and 1.88 (1.43–2.47), respectively, independent of age, smoking status, treatment type, or tumor and lymph node (T/N) categories in multivariable analyses. The MuNI was also prognostic for DFS, OS, and DMFS in patients with stage I and stage III OPSCC, separately. CONCLUSION: MuNI holds promise as a low-cost, tissue-nondestructive, H&E stain–based digital biomarker test for counseling, treatment, and surveillance of patients with p16(+) OPSCC. These data support further confirmation of the MuNI in prospective trials. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH; National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, NIH; National Center for Research Resources, NIH; VA Merit Review Award from the US Department of VA Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service; US Department of Defense (DOD) Breast Cancer Research Program Breakthrough Level 1 Award; DOD Prostate Cancer Idea Development Award; DOD Lung Cancer Investigator-Initiated Translational Research Award; DOD Peer-Reviewed Cancer Research Program; Ohio Third Frontier Technology Validation Fund; Wallace H. Coulter Foundation Program in the Department of Biomedical Engineering; Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, Case Western Reserve University; NCI Cancer Center Support Grant, NIH; Career Development Award from the US Department of VA Clinical Sciences Research and Development Program; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center Support Grant, NIH; and Computational Genomic Epidemiology of Cancer Program, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH, the US Department of VA, the DOD, or the US Government.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who present with carotid encasement (CE) > 180˚, skin involvement and/or require bolus are not eligible for SBRT per RTOG 3507. The objective of this study was to characterize our institutional experience of SBRT for patients ineligible for RTOG 3507. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with recurrent HNSCC treated with SBRT from 2010-2020 with a history of prior radiation were extracted from an IRB approved database. Patients were evaluated based on CE > 180˚ or ≤180˚ and if there was skin involvement and/or use of bolus. The primary outcome was incidence of treatment related carotid bleeding event (CBE) and skin toxicity after SBRT in the absence of disease. RESULTS Thirty-one patients were treated with SBRT to 37 sites with a median follow up of 8 months (mo) (range 2-47). The median time from prior radiation to SBRT was 13 mo (range 2-257). SBRT fractionation included 35 Gy (13%), 40 Gy (57%), and 45 Gy (30%) in 5 fractions. SBRT was delivered every other day (76%) or 2 fractions (24%) per week. Concurrent immunotherapy was given in 11% and cetuximab in 8%. A total of 30% (N = 11) of sites treated exhibited CE > 180˚ and 70% (N = 26) ≤180˚. There were no CBE related to SBRT, however 18% (N = 2) of patients with CE > 180˚ experienced fatal CBE related to progressive disease at 2.3 mo and 7.6 mo from SBRT. The risk of CBE was potentially related to CE > 180˚ (P = 0.08). Skin involvement and/or use of bolus was present in 43% (N = 16) of sites treated and absent in 57% (N = 21). The rate of treatment related skin toxicity was 19% (N = 3) and only occurred in those with pre-SBRT skin involvement and/or use of bolus. The cumulative incidence of treatment related skin toxicity at 3 mo and 6 mo was 13% (95% CI 1.9-33.6) and 27% (95% CI 4.0-58.8), respectively. Of the 3 treatment related skin toxicities there was one each of grade 2, 3, and 5. Grade 5 toxicity was related to untreated SBRT wound infection as the patient transitioned to hospice. The risk of treatment related skin toxicity was possibly related to pre-SBRT skin involvement and/or use of bolus (P = 0.007). Of the 13 sites with pre-SBRT skin involvement, 31% (N = 4) completely resolved, 54% (N = 7) had residual ulceration attributed to disease, and 15% (N = 2) had ulceration related to SBRT toxicity. The cumulative incidence of local failure at site of SBRT at 3 mo and 6 mo was 13% (95% CI 4-27.3) and 38% (95% CI 20.5-55.9), respectively. The median time of local and regional recurrence free survival were 7 and 5.5 mo, respectively. Median OS was 8 mo and the estimated 1-year OS was 25% (95% CI 9.9-40.9). CONCLUSION The risk of toxicity following SBRT for patients with > 180˚ CE, skin involvement and/or use of bolus appears to be largely related to persistent or recurrent disease. There were no CBE related to SBRT in the absence of disease and 31% of patients with pre-SBRT skin involvement exhibited complete healing after SBRT. Consideration of SBRT may still be beneficial for such patients with appropriate counselling.

Purpose/Objective(s) The outcomes of second primary head and neck malignancies in survivors of HPV associated OPSCC treated with radiation have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to review the rate, management, and outcomes of non-metastatic second head and neck malignancies in patients with a history of HPV positive OPSCC treated with definitive or postoperative radiation (RT). Materials/Methods This is a single institution IRB approved retrospective study of patients with HPV positive OPSCC treated from 2001-2017 with definitive radiation and at least 3 years of follow up. Diagnoses were considered to be a second head and neck malignancy if they were distinct from index OPSCC with the exclusion of a primary or regional recurrence, primary site > 2 cm from the index OPSCC, and occurred at least 2 years from prior RT. Patients with second malignancies involving the thyroid were excluded. Actuarial analysis was used to calculate overall survival and disease control rates. Results There were a total of 418 patients who met inclusion criteria with a median follow up of 88.5 months (50.9-150.9 months). A total of 11 patients (2.6%) developed a second primary malignancy in the head and neck (2 larynx, 1 nasal cavity, 6 oral cavity and 2 oropharynx) and all were treated with definitive surgery. Median time between first and second cancers was 73 months (25-123 months). Median follow up for these patients was 25.4 months (7.7-69 months) and the median age at second malignancy was 65 years (range 54-73 years). 64% of patients were former smokers (quit > 3 months) and 36% were never smokers. Pathological tumor stage of the second cancer was T1 in 36%, T2 in 27%, T4a in 36%. The histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 9 patients, spindle cell squamous carcinoma in 1 patient, and adenosquamous carcinoma 1 patient. HPV status was negative in 45.5%, positive in 18.2% and unknown in 36.4%. Post-operative re-irradiation was given in 55%, of which 50% received concurrent chemotherapy. Locoregional control rates at 12 and 24 months were 100% and 62.5% (95% CI: 28.9-96.1%), respectively. Of the 2 patients with local failure, which occurred at 18 and 33 months after diagnosis, salvage therapy with surgery was successful. Regional failure was diagnosed in 2 patients at 13 and 16 months after diagnosis, and both of these patients ultimately died as a result of regional failure. There were no distant failures. One additional patient had died at last follow up which was unrelated to cancer. Estimated 2-year overall survival from the second head and neck malignancy was 78.9% (95% CI: 53.0-100%). Conclusion The risk of a second head and neck malignancy in survivors of HPV associated OPSCC is low, but as the incidence of HPV related OPSCC remains elevated and the likelihood of cure is excellent, secondary malignancy is an important long-term risk. Despite prior RT, consideration of post-operative re-irradiation is important as regional failure may carry a poor prognosis.

Purpose/Objective(s) Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is an established organ-preserving strategy for locally advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, but long-term survival remains suboptimal, warranting an improved approach. Immunotherapy has been studied in the metastatic and unresectable recurrent setting, but additional data are needed to assess its role in definitive therapy. The study hypothesis was that the use of immunotherapy in conjunction with chemoradiation would be safe and result in improved laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) compared to standard of care chemoradiation. Materials/Methods This trial was an open-label, single-arm, prospective, multi-institutional study. The study included a Phase I run-in portion to assess safety in the first 6 enrolled patients and a planned subsequent Phase II component. Due to slow accrual, the study was closed after enrollment of 9 patients and the data were allowed to mature. The primary endpoint of the Phase II portion was LFS at 18 months. Study patients had Stage III or IV (T1-3; N0-3; M0) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and were candidates for larynx preservation. Pembrolizumab was given as a 200 mg flat dose 3 weeks prior to the start of chemoradiation and was then given q21 days until the completion of chemoradiation. Cisplatin was given at a dose of 100 mg/m2 q21 days during radiation with allowed dose modifications for toxicities. Radiation was prescribed to a total dose of 70 Gy in 35 daily fractions using IMRT with an elective nodal dose of 56-63 Gy. Results A total of 9 patients with a median age of 54 were enrolled from 2017 to 2019. The median follow-up time was 30.1 months. None of the enrolled patients required laryngectomy, resulting in 100% LFS at 18 months for evaluable patients. The 18-month overall survival (OS) rate was 66.7%; of the 3 patient deaths, 2 were due to co-morbid conditions (diabetes, peripheral arterial disease) rather than malignancy. The remaining 6 patients were alive at the time of last follow-up and the median duration of OS was not reached. There were 27 Grade 3 toxicities, with 2 attributable to pembrolizumab. Nearly all Grade 4 (n = 4) and Grade 5 (n = 1) toxicities occurred in a single patient with poorly-controlled diabetes; the Grade 5 toxicity was due to diabetic ketoacidosis. One patient had late Grade 4 laryngeal edema requiring tracheostomy 8 months after chemoradiation; the edema has since resolved and the tracheostomy was reversed. Conclusion The use of concurrent pembrolizumab with chemoradiation for locally advanced larynx cancer resulted in high LFS. Most toxicities were attributable to chemoradiation and the majority of Grade 4 and 5 toxicities occurred in a patient with poorly-controlled diabetes. A case of late Grade 4 laryngeal edema could have been related to immunotherapy. Future studies with concurrent immunotherapy with chemoradiation should account for this possibility.

Contains fulltext : 235407.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Randomised, controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown the survival benefit of concomitant chemoradiotherapy or hyperfractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. However, the relative efficacy of these treatments is unknown. We aimed to determine whether one treatment was superior to the other. METHODS: We did a frequentist network meta-analysis based on individual patient data of meta-analyses evaluating the role of chemotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC]) and of altered fractionation radiotherapy (Meta-Analysis of Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]). Randomised, controlled trials that enrolled patients with non-metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2016, were included. We used a two-step random-effects approach, and the log-rank test, stratified by trial to compare treatments, with locoregional therapy as the reference. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. The global Cochran Q statistic was used to assess homogeneity and consistency and P score to rank treatments (higher scores indicate more effective therapies). FINDINGS: 115 randomised, controlled trials, which enrolled patients between Jan 1, 1980, and April 30, 2012, yielded 154 comparisons (28 978 patients with 19 253 deaths and 20 579 progression events). Treatments were grouped into 16 modalities, for which 35 types of direct comparisons were available. Median follow-up based on all trials was 6·6 years (IQR 5·0-9·4). Hyperfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (HFCRT) was ranked as the best treatment for overall survival (P score 97%; hazard ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·51-0·77] compared with locoregional therapy). The hazard ratio of HFCRT compared with locoregional therapy with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy (CLRT(P)) was 0·82 (95% CI 0·66-1·01) for overall survival. The superiority of HFCRT was robust to sensitivity analyses. Three other modalities of treatment had a better P score, but not a significantly better HR, for overall survival than CLRT(P) (P score 78%): induction chemotherapy with taxane, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by locoregional therapy (IC(TaxPF)-LRT; 89%), accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy (82%), and IC(TaxPF) followed by CLRT (80%). INTERPRETATION: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that further intensifying chemoradiotherapy, using HFCRT or IC(TaxPF)-CLRT, could improve outcomes over chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer. FUNDINGS: French Institut National du Cancer, French Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, and Fondation ARC.

Objectives The importance of treating the bilateral neck in lateralized small oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCC) is unclear. We sought to define the incidence and predictors of contralateral neck failure (CLF) in patients who underwent unilateral treatment. Materials and methods We performed a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with pathologic T1-T2 (AJCC 7th edition) OCC with clinically node negative contralateral neck who underwent unilateral treatment with primary surgical resection ± adjuvant radiotherapy between 2005 and 2015. Incidence of CLF was estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by univariate (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) for possible association with CLF. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS). Results 176 patients were evaluated with a median of 65.9 months of follow-up. Predominant pathologic T-stage was T1 (68%), 8.5% of patients were N1, 2.8% were N2b. Adjuvant radiotherapy was delivered to 17% of patients. 5-year incidence of CLF was 4.3% (95% CI 1.2–7.4%). Depth of invasion (DOI) > 10 mm and positive ipsilateral neck node were significant predictors for CLF on UVA. DOI > 10 mm remained significant on MVA (HR = 6.7, 95% CI 1.4–32.3, p = 0.02). The 2- and 5-year OS was 90.6% (95% CI 86.2–95.0%) and 80.6% (95% CI 74.5–86.8%), respectively. Conclusion Observation of the clinically node negative contralateral neck in small lateralized OCC can be a suitable management approach in well selected patients, however caution should be applied when DOI upstages small but deeply invasive tumors to T3 on 8th edition AJCC staging.

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.

The objective of this study is to evaluate locoregional and distant failure for human papillomavirus-associated (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) using American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC 8) staging.Retrospective cohort study of 457 patients with HPV + OPSCC, treated with platinum-based chemoradiation from 2002 to 2018, followed for a median of 4.3 years. Time to locoregional failure (TTLRF) and distant failure (TTDF) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), and multivariable Cox proportional hazards were used to evaluate associated factors and stratify risk.Rates of five-year locoregional control (LRC) and distant control (DC) were 92% (95% CI, 90-95%) and 89% (95% CI, 85-92%), respectively. Smoking, T4, N3, and stage III were associated with significantly worse TTLRF. RPA identified three distinct locoregional failure groups: cT1-3 and 19 pack-years vs. cT1-3 with ≥19 pack-years vs. cT4 (five-year LRC: 97% vs. 90% vs. 82%, P .0001). The only factor associated with significantly worse TTDF was smoking status, while stage was not correlated. RPA identified two prognostic groups: former or never smokers vs. current smokers (five-year DC: 92% vs. 77%, P = .0003).In the largest evaluation of HPV + OPSCC after platinum-based chemoradiation using AJCC 8, risk for locoregional recurrence was stratified by smoking, T category, N category, and overall stage. Risk of distant recurrence was only stratified by smoking status and not related to stage. This has implications for surveillance and clinical trial design.

Background/aim To assess factors that predict detection of tumors and oncologic outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP). Patients and methods This was a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary care institution. Results The primary site was detected at examination under anesthesia (EUA) in 92 (51.1%) patients. The primary site was detected by directed biopsies in 60 (65%), palatine tonsillectomy in 28 (30.4%), and lingual tonsillectomy in 4 patients (4.3%). Four of eight lingual tonsillectomies were positive (50%). Primary locations included: palatine tonsils (51, 28.3%), base of tongue (37, 20.6%), larynx (4, 2.2%), oral cavity (3, 1.67%) and nasopharynx (1, 0.6%). Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive status (HR=0.26, p=0.004) and treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) (HR=0.38, p=0.004) were associated with better disease free survival (DFS). Conclusion A primary site was located after aggressive investigation in approximately half of the patients. More research is warranted towards the use of lingual tonsillectomy. Predictors of favorable prognosis included HPV positive status and treatment with CRT.

Objectives Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCC-OP) have improved overall survival (OS) after distant metastasis (DM) compared to HPV negative patients. These patients may be appropriate candidates for enrollment on clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). This study seeks to identify prognostic factors associated with OS after DM, which could serve as enrollment criteria for such trials. Materials and methods From an IRB approved multi-institutional database, we retrospectively identified patients with HPV/p16 positive SCC-OP diagnosed between 2001 and 2018. Patterns of distant failure were assessed, including number of lesions at diagnosis and sites of involvement. The primary outcome was OS after DM. Prognostic factors for OS after DM were identified with Cox proportional hazards. Stepwise approach was used for multivariable analysis. Results We identified 621 patients with HPV-associated SCC-OP, of whom 82 (13.2%) were diagnosed with DM. Median OS after DM was 14.6 months. On multivariable analysis, smoking history and number of lesions were significantly associated with prolonged OS. Median OS after DM by smoking (never vs ever) was 37.6 vs 11.2 months (p = 0.006), and by lesion number (1 vs 2–4 vs 5 or more) was 41.2 vs 17.2 vs 10.8 months (p = 0.007). Conclusion Among patients with newly diagnosed metastatic HPV-associated SCC-OP, lesion number and smoking status were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival. These factors should be incorporated into the design of clinical trials investigating the utility of MDT, with or without systemic therapy, in this population.

Background: Process-related measures have been proposed as quality metrics in head and neck cancer care. A recent single-institution study identified four key metrics associated with increased survival. This study sought to validate the association of these quality metrics with survival in a multi-institutional cohort. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of patients with oral cavity squamous cell (1/2005-1/2015). Baseline patient and disease characteristics and compliance with quality metrics was evaluated. Association between compliance with quality metrics with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Failure to comply with two or more of the quality metrics was associated with worse OS, DFS, and DSS. Adherence to all or all but one of the quality metrics was found to be associated with improved survival. Conclusions: Process-related quality metrics are associated with increased survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in a multi-institutional cohort.

To explore the influence of treatment package time(TPT) in high-risk oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma(OCSCC) receiving adjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy(CRT).We queried our multi-institutional OCSCC collaborative database for cases diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 who underwent surgery followed by adjuvant CRT. All patients had high-risk features: extranodal extension(ENE) and/or positive surgical margin(PM). TPT was days between surgery to last radiotherapy fraction. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank p-values and multivariate analysis(MVA) were used to investigate the impact of TPT on overall(OS), disease-free(DFS), locoregional failure-free(LRFS) and distant metastases-free(DMFS) survival.We identified 187 cases: median age 58 (range, 24-87 years), males 66%, and ever smokers 69%. ENE and PM were detected in 85% and 32%, and oral tongue and floor of the mouth constituted 49% and 18%, respectively. Median radiotherapy and cisplatin doses received were 66 Gy and 200 mg/m2. Overall, median TPT was 98 (range, 63-162 days). OS was worse for TPT 90-days (n = 134) than TPT ≤ 90 (n = 53) at two-(65% vs. 71%) and five-years (45% vs. 62%); p = 0.05, with similar results for DFS. No influence on LRFS or DMFS was noted. More lymph nodes(LN) dissected(P = 0.039), T3-4 disease(P = 0.017), and unplanned reoperations(P = 0.037) occurred with TPT 90-days. On MVA, TPT in 10-day increments was independently detrimental for OS (Hazard Ratio: 1.14; 95 %Confidence Interval [1-1.28]; P = 0.043), perineural invasion, age and positive LN (p 0.05 for all).In one of the largest multi-institutional cohorts, TPT 90-days predicted worse OS for high-risk OCSCC receiving adjuvant CRT. All efforts are needed to optimize perioperative care and baseline conditions for favorable outcomes.

The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting was established to internationally unify and standardize the pathologic reporting of cancers based on collected evidence, as well as to allow systematic data collection across institutions and countries to guide cancer care in the future. An expert panel was convened to identify the minimum data set of elements that should be included in cancer reporting from tumors of the nasopharynx and oropharynx. Specifically, there has been a significant change in practice as a result of identifying oncogenic viruses, including human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus, because they preferentially affect the oropharynx and nasopharynx, respectively. For these anatomic sites, when viral association is taken into account, usually reported elements of in situ versus invasive tumor, depth of invasion, and degree of differentiation are no longer applicable. Thus, guidance about human papillomavirus testing in oropharyngeal carcinomas and Epstein-Barr virus testing in nasopharyngeal carcinomas is highlighted. Further, the clinical and the pathologic differences in staging as proposed by the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control are incorporated into the discussion, pointing out several areas of continued study and further elaboration. A summary of the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting guidelines for oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal carcinomas is presented, along with discussion of the salient evidence and practical issues.

Purpose To investigate the risk and outcomes of second hematologic malignancies (SHMs) in a population-based cohort of patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) treated or not with radioactive iodine (RAI). Methods Patients with WDTC were identified from SEER registries. Competing risk regression analysis was performed to calculate the risks of SHMs that occurred after WDTC treatment and outcomes after SHM development were assessed. Results Of 148,215 patients with WDTC, 53% received surgery alone and 47% received RAI. In total, 783 patients developed an SHM after a median interval of 6.5 years (interquartile range, 3.3 to 11.2 years) from WDTC diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, compared with those undergoing thyroidectomy alone, RAI treatment was associated with an increased early risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia (AML; hazard ratio, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.82; P = .01) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; hazard ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.87 to 6.36; P < .001). This increased risk of AML and CML after RAI treatment was seen even in low-risk and intermediate-risk WDTC tumors. Occurrence of AML but not CML in patients with WDTC was associated with shorter median overall survival compared with matched controls (8.0 years v 31.0 years; P = .001). In addition, AML developing after RAI trended toward inferior survival compared with matched controls with de novo AML (median overall survival, 1.2 years v 2.9 years; P = .06). Conclusion Patients with WDTC treated with RAI had an increased early risk of developing AML and CML but no other hematologic malignancies. AML that arises after RAI treatment has a poor prognosis. RAI use in patients with WDTC should be limited to patients with high-risk disease features, and patients with WDTC treated with adjuvant RAI should be monitored for myeloid malignancies as part of cancer surveillance.

BACKGROUND Time to treatment initiation (TTI) is increasing and is associated with worsening survival. In the current study, the authors sought to identify a mechanism for this relationship by assessing the effect of TTI on clinical-to-pathologic upstaging in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS Using the National Cancer Data Base, the authors analyzed patients receiving definitive surgery for SCC of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx from 2005 through 2014. The primary outcome was T, N, or stage group upstaging, defined as higher pathologic stage than clinical stage. TTI was defined as the time between diagnosis and surgery. Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression modeled upstaging and survival, respectively. RESULTS Cohorts of 60,194 patients, 51,380 patients, and 52,980 patients, respectively, with complete T, N, and stage group data were included. N upstaging was most common (18.6%), followed by stage group (17.4%) and T (12.1%) upstaging; all types were predicted by TTI. Compared with a TTI of 1 to 6 days, TTIs as short as 7 to 13 days (odds ratio, 1.20; P = .038) or ≥ 70 days (odds ratio, 2.04; P

Purpose/Objective(s) Approximately 30-40% of patients irradiated for HNSCC will develop locoregional recurrence or second primary tumors (RSPT). Treatment of RSPT originating within a previously radiated field presents a technical challenge and typically portends worse outcomes than an initial course of RT. Anti-PD-1 therapy has shown promise in the treatment of advanced HNSCC. CA209-9KY aimed to investigate the potential benefit of nivo during and after IMRT based re-irradiation in RSPT. We report here the toxicity and QOL data for 44 enrolled patients. Materials/Methods Following IRB approval at 3 participating institutions, patients were enrolled if they had RSPT arising in a previously irradiated field (> 40 Gy) and met criteria for reirradiation classes I or II (Ward et al, IJROBP 2018); prior salvage resection was allowed regardless of HPV status provided patients had positive margins, extranodal extension, gross residual disease, N2/3 or T3/4 disease, multifocal perineural invasion, and/or lymphovascular space invasion. IMRT reirradiation with photons was delivered in 60-66 Gy in 30-33 daily fractions over 6-6.5 weeks with Nivo (240 mg) two weeks prior to and every 2 weeks during IMRT for a total of 5 doses then at 480 mg every 4 weeks for a total of 52 weeks. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) (Version 4) was assessed pre-therapy and weeks 6, 18, 30 and 52. The sum of FACT-G subscales (SUMQOL) score was also computed. Median and interquartile range (IQR) for each subscale and SUMQOL were recorded per cycle visit. FACT-HN was assessed at the same time intervals. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha and reported for each FACT sub-scale at each cycle Results As of 1/2021, a total of 44 patients have completed IMRT with nivolumab with a median follow up duration of 6.3 mos [95% CI (4.5-11.2)]. The most common toxicities of any grade-(CTCAE version 4.0) were fatigue (77%), dermatitis (54%), and dysphagia (52%). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred in 47% of patients, with lymphopenia being the most common (11%), followed by diarrhea (7%). Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) occurred in 20% of patients with the most reported being dyspnea (4%). The median total sumQoL scores for FACT-HN per visit were 71 (61-80), 73 (67-77), 70 (67.8-76.2), 74 (66.2-79.7) and 71 (66-79), respectively. Similar observations were seen for FACT-G Scores for subscales with a median total FACT-G sumQoL scores per visit 54 (46.2-56.8), 55(53.5-59.2), 54 (50-57), 55.5(52-58.2), and 55 (52.5-57.5), respectively. FACT-G and FACT-H&N QOL scores remained consistent across all time points analyzed. The internal consistency and reliability for the FACT scores per sub-scale, per cycle and for all response items had a Cronbach's alpha of > 0.7. Conclusion Reirradiation with IMRT with concurrent and adjuvant nivo in patients with RSPT appears to be well tolerated with preservation of QOL measures during and following completion of therapy. Follow up for clinical efficacy measures of IMRT-nivo continues.

Purpose The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) produced an evidence-based guideline on radiation therapy in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) that was determined to be relevant to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) membership. After applying standard critical appraisal policy and endorsement procedures, ASCO chose to endorse the ASTRO guideline. Methods The ASTRO guideline was reviewed by ASCO content experts for clinical accuracy and by ASCO methodologists for developmental rigor. On favorable review, an ASCO Expert Panel was convened to review the guideline contents and recommendations. The ASCO guideline approval body, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee, approved the final endorsement. Results The ASCO Expert Panel determined that the ASTRO guideline recommendations, published in July 2017, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorsed the ASTRO guideline and added minor qualifying statements. Recommendations Recommendations for the addition of systemic therapy to definitive radiotherapy in the treatment of OPSCC, postoperative radiotherapy with and without systemic therapy following primary surgery of OPSCC, induction chemotherapy in the treatment of OPSCC, and the appropriate dose, fractionation, and volume regimens with and without systemic therapy in the treatment of OPSCC are outlined for a variety of disease stages and clinical scenarios. ASCO Endorsement Panel qualifying statements and minor modifications were made to the ASTRO recommendations. The staging system that is referenced in these guidelines is the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .

Exposure to ionizing radiation increases the risk of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), but such risks are not known in well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) patients treated with radioactive iodine (RAI). A total of 148 215 WDTC patients were identified from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries between 1973 and 2014, of whom 54% underwent definitive thyroidectomy and 46% received adjuvant RAI. With a median follow-up of 6.6 years, 77 and 66 WDTC patients developed MDS and MPN, respectively. Excess absolute risks for MDS and MPN from RAI treatment when compared to background rates in the US population were 6.6 and 8.1 cases per 100 000 person-years, respectively. Compared to background population rates, relative risks of developing MDS (3.85 [95% CI, 1.7-7.6]; P=0.0005) and MPN (3.13 [1.1-6.8]; P=0.012) were significantly elevated in the second and third year following adjuvant RAI therapy, but not after thyroidectomy alone. The increased risk was significantly associated with WDTC size >2 cm or regional disease. Development of MDS was associated with shorter median overall survival in WDTC survivors (10.3 vs 22.5 years; P

Objective Nivolumab is the first drug to demonstrate a survival benefit for platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. We performed a cost-utility analysis to assess the economic value of nivolumab as compared to alternative standard agents in this context. Materials and methods Using data from the CheckMate 141 trial, we constructed a Markov simulation model from the US payer’s perspective to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab compared to physician choice of either cetuximab, methotrexate or docetaxel. Alternative strategies considered included: single-agent cetuximab, methotrexate or docetaxel, or first testing for PD-L1 to select for nivolumab. Costs were extracted from Medicare and utilities from the literature and CheckMate. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was used to evaluate parameter uncertainty. $100,000/QALY was the primary threshold for cost-effectiveness. Results When comparing nivolumab to the standard arm of CheckMate, nivolumab demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $140,672/QALY. When comparing standard therapies, methotrexate was the most cost-effective with similar results for docetaxel. Nivolumab was cost-effective compared to single-agent cetuximab (ICER $89,786/QALY). Treatment selection by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry did not markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab. Factors likely to positively impact the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab include better baseline quality-of-life, poor tolerability of standard treatments and/or a lower cost of nivolumab. Conclusions Nivolumab is preferred to single-agent cetuximab but requires a willingness-to-pay of at least $150,000/QALY to be considered cost-effective when compared to docetaxel or methotrexate. Selection by PD-L1 does not markedly improve the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab. This informs patient selection and clinical care-path development.

Objectives/Hypothesis Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)–induced cancer of unknown primary (CUP) are generally excluded from clinical trials, despite surgical series reporting detection rates of occult oropharynx primaries of >80%. We performed a matched-pair analysis to compare outcomes between T0N1-3M0 HPV+ CUP and T1-2N1-3M0 HPV+ oropharynx known primary (OPX). Study Design Retrospective cohort study at a single institution. Methods Patients with early T stage, node positive HPV+ OPX or CUP treated with curative intent between 1998 and 2016 were identified. For a subgroup of CUP patients with an unknown HPV status, we imputed HPV status and included patients with a >80% probability of being HPV+. Cohorts were matched based on patient demographics using a nearest neighbor propensity technique. After matching, patients were grouped according to either a favorable or unfavorable risk stratification designations per current NRG Oncology clinical trial enrollment criteria. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Of 298 patients with T1-2N1-3 OPX, 48 were matched to 48 HPV+ CUP patients (32 with confirmed and 16 imputed HPV status). Median follow-up for CUP (34.1 months) and OPX (27.8 months) patients were similar (P = .23).There were no significant differences between the CUP and OPX groups for 3-year DFS (89% vs. 85%, P = .44), and 3-year OS (91% vs. 91%, P = .11), respectively. Conclusions Patients with T0N+M0 HPV-induced CUP have similar survival outcomes to matched patients with T1-2N+M0 HPV+ OPX. These patients can reasonably be included in clinical trials investigating the role of treatment deintensification and risk stratified similar to patients with early-stage known primary OPX cancer. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 2017

Objective/Hypothesis There are limited treatment options beyond surgical salvage for patients who fail nonoperative treatment for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. In this study, we examine the failure patterns after surgical salvage and the potential pathologic and clinical prognostic variables that might guide further postoperative intensification investigation. Study Design Retrospective analysis at a tertiary academic referral center. Methods From an institutional review board-approved institutional head and neck cancer registry, a consecutive series of 147 patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy for squamous cell cancer recurrence or persistence after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy between May 1995 and May 2016 were identified. Variables potentially associated with oncologic outcome after surgical salvage were then collected and retrospectively evaluated. Results The projected 2-year locoregional failure rate was 21.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.6%–29.0%]), and the overall survival 65% (95% CI, 57.5%–74.3%) for the entire cohort after salvage laryngectomy. On multivariable analysis, sarcomatoid/spindle cell pathology (hazard ratio [HR], 3.147; 95% CI, 1.181–8.386; P = 0.022), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (positive vs. negative; HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.21–4.42; P = 0.011), and advanced initial American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition grouped stage (stages III–IVB vs. stages I–II; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.04–2.6; P = 0.035) were found to be independently associated with inferior disease-free survival. No other clinical or pathologic variables predicted failure. Conclusion Salvage laryngectomy after nonoperative treatment failure results in successful locoregional control rates and survival in the majority of patients failing initial therapy. This should temper enthusiasm for routine treatment intensification with postoperative re-irradiation and/or other systemic treatments for the vast majority of patients. Sarcomatoid pathology, LVSI, and an advanced initial stage are associated with inferior disease-free survival. The presence of these factors may warrant further investigational study of treatment intensification after salvage laryngectomy. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 2017

Purpose To present evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with definitive or adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Methods and materials The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened the OPSCC Guideline Panel to perform a systematic literature review investigating the following key questions: (1) When is it appropriate to add systemic therapy to definitive RT in the treatment of OPSCC? (2) When is it appropriate to deliver postoperative RT with and without systemic therapy following primary surgery for OPSCC? (3) When is it appropriate to use induction chemotherapy in the treatment of OPSCC? (4) What are the appropriate dose, fractionation, and volume regimens with and without systemic therapy in the treatment of OPSCC? Results Patients with stage IV and stage T3 N0-1 OPSCC treated with definitive RT should receive concurrent high-dose intermittent cisplatin. Patients receiving adjuvant RT following surgical resection for positive surgical margins or extracapsular extension should be treated with concurrent high-dose intermittent cisplatin, and individuals with these risk factors who are intolerant of cisplatin should not routinely receive adjuvant concurrent systemic therapy. Induction chemotherapy should not be routinely delivered to patients with OPSCC. For patients with stage IV and stage T3 N0-1 OPSCC ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation therapy, altered fractionation RT should be used. Conclusion The successful management of OPSCC requires the collaboration of radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists. When high-level data are absent for clinical decision-making, treatment recommendations should incorporate patient values and preferences to arrive at the optimal therapeutic approach.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Head and Neck Cancers provide treatment recommendations for cancers of the lip, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, ethmoid and maxillary sinuses, and salivary glands. Recommendations are also provided for occult primary of the head and neck (H&N), and separate algorithms have been developed by the panel for very advanced H&N cancers. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussion and most recent recommendations regarding the increase in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer and the availability of immunotherapy agents for treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic H&N cancer.

Background Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer is associated with favorable outcomes, prompting investigations into treatment deintensification. The purpose of this study was for us to present the predictors of distant metastases in patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy (bio-RT). Methods In patients with stage III to IVb HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer, the Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate distant metastases rates. Univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were used to identify factors associated with distant metastases. Results Increased distant metastases rates were noted in active smokers versus never/former smokers (22% vs 5%), T4 vs T1 to T3 (15% vs 6%), and cetuximab-based bio-RT versus CRT (23% vs 5%). All remained significant on MVA. Conclusion T4 tumors and active smokers have substantial rates of distant metastases, and trials investigating intensified systemic therapies may be considered. Higher rates of distant metastases observed with concurrent cetuximab are hypothesis generating, but further data are needed. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 940-946, 2017.

This study examines the utility of surveillance imaging in detecting locoregional failures (LRF), distant failures (DF) and second primary tumors (SPT) in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).An institutional database identified 225 patients with biopsy proven, non- metastatic HPV+ OPC treated with definitive CRT between 2004 and 2015, whose initial post-treatment imaging was negative for disease recurrence (DR). Two groups were defined: patients with2 scans/year Group 1 and patients with ≥2 scans/year Group 2. The Mann-Whitney test or Chi-square was used to determine differences in baseline characteristics between groups. FineGray regression was used to detect an association between imaging frequency, DR and diagnosis of SPT.Median follow up was 40.8 months. 30% of patients had ≥T3 disease and 90% had ≥ N2 disease (AJCC 7th edition). Twenty one failures (9.3%) were observed, 7 LRF and 15 DF. Six LRF occurred within 24 months and 14 DF occurred within 36 months of treatment completion. Regression analysis showed Group 2 had increased risk of DR compared to Group1 (HR 10.3; p = 0.002) albeit with more advanced disease at baseline. Five SPT were found (2 lung, 2 esophagus, and 1 oropharynx) between 4.5 and 159 months post-CRT.Surveillance imaging seems most useful in the first 2-3 years post treatment, and is particularly important in detecting DF. Surveillance scans for SPT has a low yield, but should be considered for those meeting lung cancer screening guidelines.

PURPOSE An ASCO provisional clinical opinion offers timely clinical direction to ASCO’s membership after publication or presentation of potentially practice-changing data from major studies. This provisional clinical opinion addresses the role of treatment deintensification in the management of p16+ oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). CLINICAL CONTEXT For patients with p16+ OPC, current treatment approaches are well established. In the good-prognosis subset of nonsmoking p16+ patients with early-stage disease, these treatments have been highly successful, albeit with significant associated acute and late toxicity. Deintensification of surgical, radiation, and medical treatment in an effort to reduce toxicity while preserving high survival rates is an appropriate therapeutic objective currently being explored in patients who are experiencing the best treatment results. However, careful delineation of this good-risk subset is essential. While the current eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is prognostically robust, it should not be interpreted as reason to alter therapeutic decisions or justify treatment deintensification. The development of transoral surgical techniques and the adoption of intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning have been transformative in disease management and suggest potentially beneficial approaches. Recent advances in systemic treatments have been notable. The optimal integration and modification of these modalities to ameliorate toxicity has not been defined and remains an important focus of current investigation. PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION The hypothesis that de-escalation of treatment intensity for patients with p16+ OPC can reduce long-term toxicity without compromising survival is compelling and necessitates careful study and the analysis of well-designed clinical trials before changing current treatment standards. Treatment deintensification for these patients should only be undertaken in a clinical trial. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

PURPOSE: To determine which factors influence cost in head and neck cancer (HNC) to inform the development of a bundled payment model (BPM). METHODS: Patients with stages 0 to IVB (by American Joint Commission on Cancer, 7th edition) HNC of various sites and histology treated definitively at a single tertiary care center during 2013 were included. Clinical variables and direct cost data were obtained, and their associations were investigated using χ2, t, Wilcoxon rank sum, and analysis of variance testing. Results were used to develop a BPM. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were included; 87% were white, 74% were men, 48% had oropharyngeal cancer, and 58% had stage IVA disease. Treatment consisted of surgery alone (17%), radiation alone (11%), surgery plus radiation (14%), chemoradiation (45%), and surgery plus chemoradiation (13%). On multivariable analysis, both increasing group stage and number of treatment modalities used were significantly associated with higher cost. Given that stage often dictates treatment, we developed three cost tiers that were based on overall treatment modality. Tier A, the least costly, consisted of single-modality therapy with either surgery alone or radiation alone (median cost divided by the median overall cost of treatment, 0.54; 25th to 75th percentile range, 0.29 to 1.02), followed by tier B, which consisted of bimodality therapy with either chemoradiation or surgery plus radiation (1.03; range, 0.81 to 1.35), followed by tier C, which consisted of trimodality therapy with surgery plus chemoradiation (1.43; range, 1.10 to 1.96). CONCLUSION: The number of treatment modalities required is the primary driver of cost in HNC. These data can simplify development of a comprehensive HNC BPM.

BACKGROUND The role of smoking among patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is unclear. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients with HPV(+) OPSCC from 2001 to 2015 at a tertiary-care institution was conducted. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). RESULTS Among 484 included patients, 94 (19.4%) were active smokers, 226 (46.7%) were former smokers, and 164 (33.9%) never smoked. Among active smokers, 82 patients (87.2%) had a ≥10 pack-year and 69 (73.4%) had a ≥20 pack-year smoking history. After adjusting for covariates, active smoking was a significant predictor of inferior OS (HR 2.28, P

Recent advances have permitted successful therapeutic targeting of the immune system in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). These new immunotherapeutic targets and agents are being rapidly adopted by the oncologic community and hold considerable promise. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a Clinical Trials Planning Meeting to address the issue of how to further investigate the use of immunotherapy in patients with HNSCC. The goals of the meeting were to consider phase 2 or 3 trial designs primarily in 3 different patient populations: those with previously untreated, human papillomavirus-initiated oropharyngeal cancers; those with previously untreated, human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC; and those with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. In addition, a separate committee was formed to develop integrative biomarkers for the clinical trials. The meeting started with an overview of key immune components and principles related to HNSCC, including immunosurveillance and immune escape. Four clinical trial concepts were developed at the meeting integrating different immunotherapies with existing standards of care. These designs were presented for implementation by the head and neck committees of the National Cancer Institute-funded National Clinical Trials Network. This article summarizes the proceedings of this Clinical Trials Planning Meeting, the purpose of which was to facilitate the rigorous development and design of randomized phase 2 and 3 immunotherapeutic trials in patients with HNSCC. Although reviews usually are published immediately after the meeting is held, this report is unique because there are now tangible clinical trial designs that have been funded and put into practice and the studies are being activated to accrual. Cancer 2017;123:1259-1271. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Preoperative therapy is frequently employed in the management of esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, many patients are found to have advanced pathologic stage and have poor outcomes. A prognostic factor which identifies this patient population before surgery would be desirable, as alternative treatment strategies may be warranted. Between 2/08 and 1/12, 60 evaluable patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma enrolled in single-arm phase II trial of induction chemotherapy, surgery, and post-operative adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). A clinical stage of T3, N1, or M1a (AJCC 6th) was required for eligibility. Induction chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m2 d1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for 3 weeks, was given every 21 days for 3 cycles and was followed by surgical resection. Adjuvant CRT consisted of 50–55 Gy @ 1.8–2.0 Gy/day and 2 cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/day) given as 96-h infusions during weeks 1 and 4 of radiotherapy. Dysphagia was assessed at baseline and after induction chemotherapy. Persistent dysphagia was associated with worse distant metastatic control [HR 3.48 (1.43–8.43), p = 0.006], recurrence free survival [HR 3.04 (1.34–6.92), p = 0.008], and overall survival [HR 3.31 (1.43–7.66), p = 0.005]. Persistent dysphagia was associated with more advanced pathologic T descriptor (pT) (p = 0.048) and N descriptor (pN) (p = 0.002), a greater median number of involved lymph nodes (3 v 1, p = 0.003), and greater residual tumor viability (p = 0.05). No patients with persistent dysphagia had pT0-T2 or pN0 disease. Persistent dysphagia after induction chemotherapy is associated with more advanced pathologic stage and inferior outcomes.

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of systemic therapy along with definitive radiotherapy for elderly patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS Patients who were 71 years old or older with stage III to IVB squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx treated with definitive radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. Patterns of systemic therapy use before or during definitive radiotherapy were investigated. The association between systemic therapy use and overall survival was investigated with a multivariate, inverse probability–weighted propensity score–adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Elderly patients treated between 2004 and 2012 (n = 4165) were identified, and 80.4% received systemic therapy. The median follow-up was 26 months (range, 1.8-125 months), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 51.6% (95% confidence interval, 50.0%-53.2%). During the study period, there was an increase in the frequency of systemic therapy use from 64% in 2004 to 86% in 2012. The use of systemic therapy was associated with improved overall survival in the multivariate model (hazard ratio, 1.456; 95% confidence interval, 1.308-1.620; P

Background T2 glottic cancer with impaired vocal cord mobility (T2b) is known to have higher local failure rates when compared with T2 cancers without impaired cord mobility (T2a) treated with radiotherapy (RT) alone. Methods In this retrospective review, we identified and compared the local control rates of 3 groups: T2aN0 treated with RT; T2bN0 treated with RT; and T2b-3N0-2 treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Results The 3-year local control rate was 95.1% for T2aN0, 73.2% for T2bN0 treated with RT, and 91.5% for the CRT group (p = .01). On univariate analysis, T2bN0 disease versus T2aN0 treated with RT alone (p = .03) was significantly associated with inferior local control. Conclusion Patients with glottic cancer with impaired vocal cord mobility (T2b) have a high rate of local failure with RT alone. The addition of concurrent chemotherapy should be considered for patients highly motivated toward larynx preservation and willing to accept the potential toxicity. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2016

Summary Purpose The long-term results of RTOG 91-11 suggested increased deaths not attributed to larynx cancer after concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) despite no apparent increase in late effects. Because the timing of events was not reported by RTOG 91-11, one possibility is that severe late dysphagia (SLD) develops beyond five years and leads to unreported treatment-related deaths. Here we explore the timing of SLD after CRT. Methods Patients who would have met eligibility criteria for RTOG 91-11 and were treated with CRT between 1993 and 2013 were identified. Events occurring beyond 3 months after treatment and suggestive of SLD were recorded including esophageal stricture dilations, hospital admissions for aspiration pneumonia or feeding-tube insertion. Feeding-tube dependence beyond one year was also considered SLD. The cumulative incidence of SLD and its components was quantified using Gray’s competing risk analysis with recurrence or death considered competing risks. Results Eighty-four patients were included with a median follow-up of 43 months. The 5-year overall survival was 70% (95% CI 58–80%). No death was directly a result of treatment-induced late dysphagia. The 5-year incidence of SLD was 26.5%. While 15 of 18 (83%) first stricture dilations occurred within 5 years after CRT, 3 of 5 (60%) aspiration admissions and 5 of 8 late feeding tube insertions occurred beyond five years from CRT. Conclusions SLD is common after CRT for larynx cancer and can occur beyond 5 years from the end of treatment, emphasizing the importance of survivorship follow-up. Despite the incidence of SLD, death related to dysphagia is uncommon.

Human papillomavirus-related (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer is a rapidly emerging disease with generally good prognosis. Many prognostic algorithms for oropharyngeal cancer incorporate HPV status as a stratification factor, rather than recognising the uniqueness of HPV+ disease. The International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S) aimed to develop a TNM classification specific to HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer.The ICON-S study included patients with non-metastatic oropharyngeal cancer from seven cancer centres located across Europe and North America; one centre comprised the training cohort and six formed the validation cohorts. We ascertained patients' HPV status with p16 staining or in-situ hybridisation. We compared overall survival at 5 years between training and validation cohorts according to 7th edition TNM classifications and HPV status. We used recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) and adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) modelling methods to derive new staging classifications for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer. Recent hypotheses concerning the effect of lower neck lymph nodes and number of lymph nodes were also investigated in an exploratory training cohort to assess relevance within the ICON-S classification.Of 1907 patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer, 661 (35%) were recruited at the training centre and 1246 (65%) were enrolled at the validation centres. 5-year overall survival was similar for 7th edition TNM stage I, II, III, and IVA (respectively; 88% [95% CI 74-100]; 82% [71-95]; 84% [79-89]; and 81% [79-83]; global p=0·25) but was lower for stage IVB (60% [53-68]; p0·0001). 5-year overall survival did not differ among N0 (80% [95% CI 73-87]), N1-N2a (87% [83-90]), and N2b (83% [80-86]) subsets, but was significantly lower for those with N3 disease (59% [51-69]; p0·0001). Stage classifications derived by RPA and AHR models were ranked according to survival performance, and AHR-New was ranked first, followed by AHR-Orig, RPA, and 7th edition TNM. AHR-New was selected as the proposed ICON-S stage classification. Because 5-year overall survival was similar for patients classed as T4a and T4b, T4 is no longer subdivided in the re-termed ICON-S T categories. Since 5-year overall survival was similar among N1, N2a, and N2b, we re-termed the 7th edition N categories as follows: ICON-S N0, no lymph nodes; ICON-S N1, ipsilateral lymph nodes; ICON-S N2, bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes; and ICON-S N3, lymph nodes larger than 6 cm. This resembles the N classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma but without a lower neck lymph node variable. The proposed ICON-S classification is stage I (T1-T2N0-N1), stage II (T1-T2N2 or T3N0-N2), and stage III (T4 or N3). Metastatic disease (M1) is classified as ICON-S stage IV. In an exploratory training cohort (n=702), lower lymph node neck involvement had a significant effect on survival in ICON-S stage III but had no effect in ICON-S stage I and II and was not significant as an independent factor. Overall survival was similar for patients with fewer than five lymph nodes and those with five or more lymph nodes, within all ICON-S stages.Our proposed ICON-S staging system for HPV+ oropharyngeal cancer is suitable for the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification. Future work is needed to ascertain whether T and N categories should be further refined and whether non-anatomical factors might augment the full classification.None.