Search

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a highly prevalent autoimmune disease and the most common form of autoimmune inflammatory arthritis. Studies of RA pathogenesis have contributed significantly to understanding the basis for complex immune-mediated disease, identified key steps in the development of autoimmune activation and joint damage in RA, and led to the development of targeted therapies that opened up the era biologic therapy. Current studies are linking differences in gene expression to abnormalities in cellular function that will help optimize therapy for individual patients and advance the goal of personalized medicine. Our evolving understanding and current important issues in RA are highlighted.

Background/objectives The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus system showed high specificity, while attaining also high sensitivity. We hereby analysed the performance of the individual criteria items and their contribution to the overall performance of the criteria. Methods We combined the EULAR/ACR derivation and validation cohorts for a total of 1197 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and n=1074 non-SLE patients with a variety of conditions mimicking SLE, such as other autoimmune diseases, and calculated the sensitivity and specificity for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and the 23 specific criteria items. We also tested performance omitting the EULAR/ACR criteria attribution rule, which defines that items are only counted if not more likely explained by a cause other than SLE. Results Positive ANA, the new entry criterion, was 99.5% sensitive, but only 19.4% specific, against a non-SLE population that included other inflammatory rheumatic, infectious, malignant and metabolic diseases. The specific criteria items were highly variable in sensitivity (from 0.42% for delirium and 1.84% for psychosis to 75.6% for antibodies to double-stranded DNA), but their specificity was uniformly high, with low C3 or C4 (83.0%) and leucopenia Conclusions Changing the position of the highly sensitive, non-specific ANA to an entry criterion and the attribution rule resulted in a specificity of >80% for all items, explaining the higher overall specificity of the criteria set.

Funder: American College of Rheumatology Research and Education Foundation; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000960, Funder: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000069, Funder: European League Against Rheumatism; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100008741, OBJECTIVES: The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 Classification Criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been validated with high sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated the performance of the new criteria with regard to disease duration, sex and race/ethnicity, and compared its performance against the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria. METHODS: Twenty-one SLE centres from 16 countries submitted SLE cases and mimicking controls to form the validation cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019, SLICC 2012 and ACR 1982/1997 criteria were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of female (n=1098), male (n=172), Asian (n=118), black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and white (n=941) patients; with an SLE duration of 1 to

European League Against Rheumatism and are jointly supporting multiphase development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria based on weighted criteria and a continuous probability scale. Prior steps included item generation, item reduction and hierarchical organisation of candidate criteria using an evidence-based approach. Our objectives were to determine relative weights using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) and to set a provisional threshold score for SLE classification. An SLE Expert Panel (8 European, 9 North American) submitted 164 real, unique cases with a wide range of SLE probability in a standardised format. Using the candidate criteria, experts scored and rank-ordered 20 representative cases. At an in-person meeting, experts reviewed inter-rater reliability of scoring, further refined criteria definitions and participated in an MCDA exercise. Based on expert consensus decisions on pairwise comparisons of criteria, 1000minds software calculated criteria weights and rank-ordered the remaining 144 cases based on their additive scores. The score of the lowest-ranked case for which complete expert consensus was achieved defined the provisional threshold classification score. Inter-rater reliability of scoring cases with the candidate criteria was good. MCDA involved 74 pairwise decisions and was repeated for the arthritis and mucocutaneous domains when the initial ranking of some cases did not match expert opinion. After criteria weights and additive scores were recalculated once, experts reached consensus for SLE classification for all cases scoring>83. Using an iterative process, the candidate criteria definitions were refined, preliminary weights were calculated and a provisional threshold score for SLE classification was determined.

Background Supported by both the ACR and EULAR, the EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria for SLE employ positive ANA (ever) as an entry criterion and use a weighted scheme with values ranging from 2 to 10, for a classification cut-off of 10. Criteria items are attributed to SLE only if there is no more likely alternative diagnosis in the individual patients. Items are organized in domains, and only the highest ranking item within a domain is counted. These criteria have been validated in a cohort of 696 SLE patients and 574 non-SLE patients from a total of 21 centers, reaching an overall sensitivity of 96.1% and a specificity of 93.4%. To at least estimate the performance in groups underrepresented in the validation cohort of this transatlantic project, we analyzed this cohort for patient subsets with regard to sex, ethnicity, and disease duration. Methods The full EULAR/ACR 2019 classification criteria validation cohort was analyzed for female (n=1,098) and male (n=172) patients, Asian (n=118), Black (n=68), Hispanic (n=124) and White (n=941) patients, and patients with an SLE duration of less than 1 year (n=34), one to less than 3 years (n=196), 3 to less than 5 years (n=157), and 5 or more years (n=879). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria, the SLICC 2012 criteria and the ACR 1997 criteria each. Results As shown in table 1, most of the point estimates for sensitivity and specificity in subsets lay within the 95% confidence intervals of the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria validation. In particular, sensitivity and specificity for all ethnic groups were within the confidence intervals or even higher. Formally, the sensitivity was slightly lower for male patients, corresponding to a higher specificity, but the male 95% confidence intervals (0.86–0.98 for sensitivity, 0.90–0.99 for specificity) overlapped. While sensitivity appeared independent of disease duration from year 1 on, sensitivity was only 89% in the first year of disease, identical to the SLICC criteria (89%) and numerically higher than the ACR criteria (56%), but all confidence intervals overlapped. Conclusion While not all subgroups of SLE patients in the validation cohort are of adequate size to fully explore the sensitivity and specificity of the EULAR/ACR 2019 SLE classification criteria in the respective subsets, the point estimates of sensitivity and specificity suggest that the new criteria perform at least reasonably well in all ethnic groups, in men and in early disease. Nevertheless, sensitivity and specificity should be independently validated in larger groups of Asian, Black and Hispanic patients, male patients and in early disease.

Background The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) embarked on a project to re-evaluate classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The first phase of the classification project involved generation of a broad set of items potentially useful for classification of SLE and their selection for use in a subsequent forced-choice decision analysis. Methods A large international group of expert lupus clinicians was invited to participate in a 2-step process to generate, rate and select items based on their importance in diagnosing early and established SLE, respectively, via a web-based survey. Results 135 and 147 experts were invited to participate in the item generation and item reduction process, respectively. Out of 145 items generated, item reduction resulted in 40 candidate items moving forward to the next phase. Key features for classifying both early and established SLE included characteristic autoantibodies, specific renal features, and skin manifestations. A small majority (51%) stated that one organ system would be sufficient for classifying SLE, but that additional typical laboratory features (ANA, dsDNA) would be required. Notably, 85% of the expert group would positively classify SLE if renal pathology alone showed lupus nephritis. Conclusion The Delphi exercise resulted in a set of 40 candidate criteria for the classification of SLE for subsequent assessment. This study comprised the largest panel ever involved in the development of SLE classification criteria, providing a broadly representative view of the current approach to classification SLE. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Objective The European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology jointly embarked on a new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) project. Its first phase involved generation of a broad set of items potentially useful for classification of SLE. This study was undertaken to add the patient perspective to an expert Delphi approach and an early patient cohort study. Methods A national cross-sectional study was conducted. A self-report questionnaire was published in the “Schmetterling” (Butterfly), the quarterly journal of the German SLE patient association. Individuals with SLE were asked to anonymously complete the questionnaire, which asked for demographic details, organ manifestations, autoantibodies and symptoms. Results A total of 339 completed questionnaires out of 2498 were returned, a response rate of 13.6%; 83.2% reported they were ANA positive and 81.7% reported joint, 66.1% skin and 33.0% renal involvement. For the time before and in the first year after their SLE diagnosis, the majority reported fatigue (89.4%), joint pain (86.7%), photosensitivity (79.4%) and myalgia (76.1%). Of interest, more than half of the patients reported fever as an early symptom (53.7%). Conclusion For a Caucasian European SLE patient population, the overall characteristics suggest meaningful representation. While many symptoms were reported as expected, the high percentage of patients reporting fever and the significant number of patients with unexpected gastrointestinal complaints are of particular interest. These data add to the information on early SLE symptoms informing the development process of new SLE classification criteria.

To review the published literature on the performance of indirect immunofluorescence (IIF)-HEp-2 antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing for classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).A systematic literature search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for articles published between January 1990 and October 2015. The research question was structured according to Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) format rules, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations were followed where appropriate. Meta-regression analysis for diagnostic tests was performed, using the ANA titer as independent variable, while sensitivity and specificity were dependent variables.Of 4,483 publications screened, 62 matched the eligibility criteria, and another 2 articles were identified through reference analysis. The included studies comprised 13,080 SLE patients in total, of whom 12,542 (95.9%) were reported to be IIF-ANA positive at various titers. For ANA at titers of 1:40, 1:80, 1:160, and 1:320, meta-regression gave sensitivity values of 98.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 97.6-99.0%), 97.8% (95% CI 96.8-98.5%), 95.8% (95% CI 94.1-97.1%), and 86.0% (95% CI 77.0-91.9%), respectively. The corresponding specificities were 66.9% (95% CI 57.8-74.9%), 74.7% (95% CI 66.7-81.3%), 86.2% (95% CI 80.4-90.5%), and 96.6% (95% CI 93.9-98.1%), respectively.The results of this systematic literature review and meta-regression confirm that IIF-ANAs have high sensitivity for SLE. ANAs at a titer of 1:80 have sufficiently high sensitivity to be considered as an entry criterion for SLE classification criteria, i.e., formally test other classification criteria for SLE only if ANAs of at least 1:80 have been found.

Objective.Given the complexity and heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), high-performing classification criteria are critical to advancing research and clinical care. A collaborative effort by the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology was undertaken to generate candidate criteria, and then to reduce them to a smaller set. The objective of the current study was to select a set of criteria that maximizes the likelihood of accurate classification of SLE, particularly early disease.Methods.An independent panel of international SLE experts and the SLE classification criteria steering committee (conducting SLE research in Canada, Mexico, United States, Austria, Germany, Greece, France, Italy, and Spain) ranked 43 candidate criteria. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique (NGT) was conducted to reduce the list of criteria for consideration.Results.The expert panel NGT exercise reduced the candidate criteria for SLE classification from 43 to 21. The panel distinguished potential “entry criteria,” which would be required for classification, from potential “additive criteria.” Potential entry criteria were antinuclear antibody (ANA) ≥ 1:80 (HEp-2 immunofluorescence), and low C3 and/or low C4. The use of low complement as an entry criterion was considered potentially useful in cases with negative ANA. Potential additive criteria included lupus nephritis by renal biopsy, autoantibodies, cytopenias, acute and chronic cutaneous lupus, alopecia, arthritis, serositis, oral mucosal lesions, central nervous system manifestations, and fever.Conclusion.The NGT exercise resulted in 21 candidate SLE classification criteria. The next phases of SLE classification criteria development will require refinement of criteria definitions, evaluation of the ability to cluster criteria into domains, and evaluation of weighting of criteria.

ObjectiveTo develop new classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) jointly supported by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).MethodsThis international initiative had four phases. (1) Evaluation of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion through systematic review and meta-regression of the literature and criteria generation through an international Delphi exercise, an early patient cohort and a patient survey. (2) Criteria reduction by Delphi and nominal group technique exercises. (3) Criteria definition and weighting based on criterion performance and on results of a multi-criteria decision analysis. (4) Refinement of weights and threshold scores in a new derivation cohort of 1001 subjects and validation compared with previous criteria in a new validation cohort of 1270 subjects.ResultsThe 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE include positive ANA at least once as obligatory entry criterion; followed by additive weighted criteria grouped in seven clinical (constitutional, haematological, neuropsychiatric, mucocutaneous, serosal, musculoskeletal, renal) and three immunological (antiphospholipid antibodies, complement proteins, SLE-specific antibodies) domains, and weighted from 2 to 10. Patients accumulating ≥10 points are classified. In the validation cohort, the new criteria had a sensitivity of 96.1% and specificity of 93.4%, compared with 82.8% sensitivity and 93.4% specificity of the ACR 1997 and 96.7% sensitivity and 83.7% specificity of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics 2012 criteria.ConclusionThese new classification criteria were developed using rigorous methodology with multidisciplinary and international input, and have excellent sensitivity and specificity. Use of ANA entry criterion, hierarchically clustered and weighted criteria reflect current thinking about SLE and provide an improved foundation for SLE research.

Background This 4 phase project1 jointly supported by EULAR and ACR has led to draft criteria.2 Objectives To simplify and validate the new criteria in a large international cohort. Methods 23 expert centres each contributed up to 100 patients with SLE and with non-SLE diagnoses. Diagnoses were verified by 3 independent reviewers for 1,193 SLE and 1059 non-SLE patients. 500 randomly selected SLE and non-SLE patients formed the derivation cohort and the remainder the validation cohort. Results The criteria were fine-tuned and simplified, using ANA of ≥1:80 as entry criterion and a classification threshold of 10. Sensitivity was close to the SLICC 2012 criteria, specificity maintained at the level of the ACR 1997 criteria. This performance was independently confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions The new criteria developed with EULAR/ACR support achieved sensitivity close to the SLICC criteria, while maintaining the specificity of the ACR criteria. References [1] Aringer, et al. Ann Rheum Dis2017;76(S2):4. [2] Tedeschi, et al. Ann Rheum Dis2017;76(S2):50. Disclosure of Interest None declared

A European League Against Rheumatism-American College of Rheumatology working group consisting of practicing and academic rheumatologists, a rheumatology researcher, and a patient representative created a succinct general statement describing rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) in adults and children in language that can be used in conversations with the lay public, media, healthcare providers, and other stakeholders. Based on the literature review, several elements were deemed important for inclusion in the description of RMDs. First, RMDs encompass many different diseases that can affect individuals at any age, including children. Second, there are various pathophysiological pathways underlying different RMDs. Third, the impact of RMDs on individuals and society should be emphasized. The working group agreed that the language should be comprehensible to the lay public. Thus, the following description of RMDs has been developed: "Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are a diverse group of diseases that commonly affect the joints, but can affect any organ of the body. There are more than 200 different RMDs, affecting both children and adults. They are usually caused by problems of the immune system, inflammation, infections, or gradual deterioration of joints, muscles, and bones. Many of these diseases are long term and worsen over time. They are typically painful and limit function. In severe cases, RMDs can result in significant disability, having a major impact on both quality of life and life expectancy." This description can be used by rheumatology groups, researchers, and those who work in advocacy and education related to RMDs.

Background EULAR and ACR are supporting multi-phase development of SLE classification criteria based on weighted criteria and a continuous probability scale. Prior steps included criteria generation, criteria reduction through Delphi and Nominal Group Technique exercises, literature review for sensitivity/specificity of candidate criteria, and organization of candidate criteria into seven clinical and three immunologic domains. Objectives To refine definitions of candidate criteria, determine relative weights using multicriteria decision analysis, and determine a threshold score for SLE classification. Methods An SLE Expert Panel (9 North American, 8 European) submitted 167 unique cases with a range of SLE probability. Experts scored 20 representative cases using the candidate criteria and rank-ordered them. In a 2-day meeting, experts reviewed inter-rater reliability of scoring, refined criteria definitions, and participated in a multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) exercise using 1000Minds TM software. Experts were presented a series of decisions between two cases, each with different criteria from two domains (e.g. oral ulcers [cutaneous] and acute pericarditis [serositis] vs. alopecia [cutaneous] and pleural effusion [serositis]) and anonymously voted for the case more likely to be classified as SLE. Votes were discussed until consensus was reached for each decision. Using the consensus decisions, 1000Minds™ calculated criteria weights, assigned a total score to each of remaining 147 cases and rank-ordered the cases. Experts voted on whether each case should be classified as SLE. MCDA was repeated for criteria whose calculated weights were inconsistent with expert opinion until group consensus was achieved. 1000Minds TM then re-calculated criteria weights and re-ranked cases once. The score of the last case for which expert consensus was achieved was the threshold score. Results Inter-rater reliability was good; human data entry error, not following instructions, and differing interpretations of criteria definitions accounted for discrepancies. Arthritis and pericarditis definitions were modified through group discussion. The MCDA involved 74 pairwise decisions. Cranial neuropathy and Class VI lupus nephritis were removed as they added little to SLE classification. MCDA was repeated for the arthritis and cutaneous domains as initial weights did not match expert opinion. After criteria weights and scores were re-calculated once, experts reached consensus for SLE classification for case score >83. Conclusions Using an iterative process, the expert panel refined definitions, weighted candidate criteria and determined a threshold score of >83 for SLE classification, which will undergo validation. Acknowledgements Joint support from EULAR and ACR Disclosure of Interest None declared

The RACAT (Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparison of Active Therapies) trial found triple therapy to be noninferior to etanercept-methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).To determine the cost-effectiveness of etanercept-methotrexate versus triple therapy as a first-line strategy.A within-trial analysis based on the 353 participants in the RACAT trial and a lifetime analysis that extrapolated costs and outcomes by using a decision analytic cohort model.The RACAT trial and sources from the literature.Patients with active RA despite at least 12 weeks of methotrexate therapy.24 weeks and lifetime.Societal and Medicare.Etanercept-methotrexate first versus triple therapy first.Incremental costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).The within-trial analysis found that etanercept-methotrexate as first-line therapy provided marginally more QALYs but accumulated substantially higher drug costs. Differences in other costs between strategies were negligible. The ICERs for first-line etanercept-methotrexate and triple therapy were $2.7 million per QALY and $0.98 million per QALY over 24 and 48 weeks, respectively. The lifetime analysis suggested that first-line etanercept-methotrexate would result in 0.15 additional lifetime QALY, but this gain would cost an incremental $77 290, leading to an ICER of $521 520 per QALY per patient.Considering a long-term perspective, an initial strategy of etanercept-methotrexate and biologics with similar cost and efficacy is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with using triple therapy first, even under optimistic assumptions.Data on the long-term benefit of triple therapy are uncertain.Initiating biologic therapy without trying triple therapy first increases costs while providing minimal incremental benefit.The Cooperative Studies Program, Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and an interagency agreement with the National Institutes of Health-American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

OBJECTIVE: To define candidate criteria within multiphase development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria, jointly supported by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism. Prior steps included item generation and reduction by Delphi exercise, further narrowed to 21 items in a nominal group technique exercise. Our objectives were to apply an evidence-based approach to the 21 candidate criteria, and to develop hierarchical organization of criteria within domains. METHODS: A literature review identified the sensitivity and specificity of the 21 candidate criteria. Data on the performance of antinuclear antibody (ANA) as an entry criterion and operating characteristics of the candidate criteria in early SLE patients were evaluated. Candidate criteria were hierarchically organized into clinical and immunologic domains, and definitions were refined in an iterative process. RESULTS: Based on the data, consensus was reached to use a positive ANA of ≥1:80 titer (HEp-2 cells immunofluorescence) as an entry criterion and to have 7 clinical and 3 immunologic domains, with hierarchical organization of criteria within domains. Definitions of the candidate criteria were specified. CONCLUSION: Using a data-driven process, consensus was reached on new, refined criteria definitions and organization based on operating characteristics. This work will be followed by a multicriteria decision analysis exercise to weight criteria and to identify a threshold score for classification on a continuous probability scale.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of abatacept in the treatment of active lupus nephritis. An additional exploratory objective was to assess the potential of abatacept to induce ‘clinical tolerance’, defined as sustained clinical quiescence of lupus nephritis after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy.

Objective To determine the predictors of elevated transaminases in an incident user cohort of older adult patients with rheumatic diseases receiving methotrexate (MTX) using elements derived from an electronic health record. Methods Using a national, administrative database of patients seen through the Veterans Health Administration that included pharmacy and laboratory data, we performed an observational cohort study of veterans ages ≥65 years who were new users of MTX to identify risk factors for elevated transaminases. Results We studied 659 incident users of MTX. We found a 6% incidence of moderate (≥1.5 × the upper limit of normal) elevations in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase over a mean followup period of 7 months. We identified predictors of moderate transaminase elevations to include obesity (per body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), total cholesterol >240 mg/dl, pre-MTX liver function test (LFT) elevations, use of biologic agents, and lack of folic acid supplementation. A patient with these characteristics and >3 comorbid conditions would be predicted to have a 90% chance of developing a moderate transaminase elevation in the 7 months after starting MTX. Conclusion Moderate LFT abnormalities were uncommon in the first 7 months of MTX use, but were more likely to occur in patients with obesity, untreated high cholesterol, pre-MTX LFT elevations, biologic agent use, and lack of folic acid supplementation. Future work should aim to develop a robust, automated prediction rule for identifying patients at high risk for MTX-related liver toxicity.

Background Treat-to-target is the recommended strategy for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and involves regular assessment of disease activity using validated measures and subsequent adjustment of medical therapy if patients are not in remission or low disease activity. Recommendations published in 2012 detailed the preferred disease activity measures but there have been few publications on implementation of disease activity measures in a real-world clinic setting. Methods Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) methodology was used over two cycles with a goal of increasing provider measurement of disease activity during all RA patient visits. In PDSA cycle 1, we implemented a paper-based form to help providers assess disease activity in RA patients. PDSA cycle 2 included the creation of separate patient and physician forms for collection of information, identification of patients prior to their clinic visit and incorporation of medical assistants into the workflow. Results The first PDSA cycle improved the number of RA patients with documented disease activity measures from 24 % over a 4-week period, to an average of 44 % over an 8-week period. The second PDSA cycle showed a sustained and dramatic improvement, with 85 % of patients having a disease activity measure recorded over a 27-week period. Conclusions Implementation of disease activity measurement in a typical academic rheumatology clinic can be achieved by standardizing workflow using a simple paper form. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1633-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objectives Co-prescription of folic acid in patients receiving low dose oral methotrexate is recommended because it reduces adverse events and prolongs the use of methotrexate (MTX). However, little is known about how often new users of methotrexate are co-prescribed folic acid, and what factors are associated with its use. We aimed to determine the prevalence, predictors of, and persistence of folic acid use in a population-based cohort of MTX users with rheumatic diseases. Methods Using a national, administrative database of patients seen through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that included pharmacy and laboratory data, we performed an observational cohort study of veterans over 65 years old who were new users of MTX. We used log-binomial regression to identify independent predictors of folic acid use and Kaplan Meyer survival analysis to examine persistence of folic acid over time. Results We studied 2467 incident users of MTX. 27% of patients were not prescribed folic acid through the VHA pharmacy within 30 days of MTX initiation. Patients who did not see a rheumatologist were 23% less likely to receive folic acid compared to patients who did have a rheumatologist visit during the baseline period (RR (95% CI) 0.77 (0.72, 0.82). These results remained unchanged even after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and other factors (adjusted RR (95% CI) 0.78 (0.74, 0.85)). After 20 months, only 50% of patients continued to receive folic acid. Conclusions In a nationwide VHA cohort of new users of oral MTX, many patients did not receive folic acid or discontinued it over time. Rheumatologists were more likely to prescribe folic acid than other providers. These data highlight the need to improve patient safety for users of methotrexate by standardizing workflows for folic acid supplementation.

In the United States, approximately 35% of adults with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) have clinical evidence of nephritis at the time of diagnosis; with an estimated total of 50–60% developing nephritis during the first 10 years of disease [1–4]. The prevalence of nephritis is significantly higher in African Americans and Hispanics than in Caucasians, and is higher in men than in women. Renal damage is more likely to develop in non-Caucasian groups [2–4]. Overall survival in patients with SLE is approximately 95% at 5 years after diagnosis and 92% at 10 years [5, 6]. The presence of lupus nephritis significantly reduces survival, to approximately 88% at 10 years, with even lower survival in African Americans [5, 6]. The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) last published guidelines for management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 1999 [7]. That publication was designed primarily for education of primary care physicians and recommended therapeutic and management approaches for many manifestations of SLE. Recommendations for management of lupus nephritis (LN) consisted of pulse glucocorticoids followed by high dose daily glucocorticoids in addition to an immunosuppressive medication, with cyclophosphamide viewed as the most effective immunosuppressive medication for diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis. Mycophenolate mofetil was not yet in use for lupus nephritis and was not mentioned. Since that time, many clinical trials of glucocorticoids-plus-immunosuppressive interventions have been published, some of which are high quality prospective trials, and some not only prospective but also randomized. Thus, the ACR determined that a new set of management recommendations was in order. A combination of extensive literature review and the opinions of highly qualified experts, including rheumatologists, nephrologists and pathologists, has been used to reach the recommendations. The management strategies discussed here apply to lupus nephritis in adults, particularly to those receiving care in the United States of America, and include interventions that were available in the United States as of April 2011. While these recommendations were developed using rigorous methodology, guidelines do have inherent limitations in informing individual patient care; hence the selection of the term “recommendations.” While they should not supplant clinical judgment or limit clinical judgment, they do provide expert advice to the practicing physician managing patients with lupus nephritis.

The development of targeted biologic therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has revolutionized treatment of this chronic disease and provided clinicians with a diverse menu of options for improving disease control, limiting radiographic progression of joint damage, and enhancing physical function. However, many fundamental questions about the optimal treatment of RA remain unanswered. What is the best initial DMARD therapy for patients with recent onset RA? What is the most effective treatment strategy for reducing long term damage? When should partially effective therapy be changed? How can the risks of drug therapy be mitigated for the individual patient? It is also difficult to translate our knowledge about the efficacy and safety of different therapies to the individual patient. Without validated biomarkers of treatment response, decision-making lacks a probability framework for predicting efficacy and toxicity at a ‘personalized’ level. For this reason, treatment decisions are guided by clinical intuition in the ‘real world’ despite being solidly grounded in a body of scientific evidence.

An increasing number of studies indicate that a subset of CD4+ T cells with regulatory capacity (regulatory T cells; Tregs) can function to control organ-specific autoimmune disease. To determine whether abnormalities of thymic-derived Tregs play a role in systemic lupus erythematosus, we evaluated Treg prevalence and function in (New Zealand Black × New Zealand White)F1 (B/W) lupus-prone mice. To explore the potential of Tregs to suppress disease, we evaluated the effect of adoptive transfer of purified, ex vivo expanded thymic-derived Tregs on the progression of renal disease. We found that although the prevalence of Tregs is reduced in regional lymph nodes and spleen of prediseased B/W mice compared with age-matched non-autoimmune mice, these cells increase in number in older diseased mice. In addition, the ability of these cells to proliferate in vitro was comparable to those purified from non-autoimmune control animals. Purified CD4+CD25+CD62Lhigh B/W Tregs were expanded ex vivo 80-fold, resulting in cells with a stable suppressor phenotype. Adoptive transfer of these exogenously expanded cells reduced the rate at which mice developed renal disease; a second transfer after treated animals had developed proteinuria further slowed the progression of renal disease and significantly improved survival. These studies indicate that thymic-derived Tregs may have a significant role in the control of autoimmunity in lupus-prone B/W mice, and augmentation of these cells may constitute a novel therapeutic approach for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Blockade of antigen nonspecific costimulatory signals is a promising approach for the treatment of autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CTLA4Ig, an antagonist of the CD28/B7 costimulatory interaction, effectively prevents SLE onset in several murine models and, when used in combination with cyclophosphamide, can induce remission of active SLE nephritis. In this review we describe the known mechanisms of action of CTLA4Ig both in normal immunity and in autoimmune disease models and address issues about its activity that still need to be resolved. We discuss the preclinical use of CTLA4Ig in murine SLE models and the rationale for a clinical trial in SLE patients.

Objective To compare the effects of combined administration of cyclophosphamide (CYC) and CTLA-4Ig with the effects of these agents alone on the immunopathology and progression of renal damage in (NZB × NZW)F1 (B/W) lupus-prone mice, and to explore the clinical implications of this combination by evaluating the ability of CTLA-4Ig to sustain the benefit of CYC in patients with lupus nephritis. Methods We carried out a detailed, prospective pathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of the effects of CYC and CTLA-4Ig, alone and in combination, in kidney tissue from B/W mice. The acute effects of these agents on immune cells in the kidney were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. We also compared the effect of brief CYC plus sustained CTLA-4Ig administration with the effect of sustained administration of both agents on the progression of renal disease in B/W mice. Results As a single agent, CTLA-4Ig was generally as effective, and in some cases more effective, than CYC in slowing progression of renal disease. Combined therapy with these two agents very effectively arrested the progression of renal damage and, in some respects, reversed renal pathology. Induction therapy with both CTLA-4Ig and CYC precluded the need for continuous administration of CYC. Conclusion Our results indicate that the combination of CTLA-4Ig and CYC very effectively arrests the progression of murine lupus nephritis. These findings have direct implications for the treatment of lupus nephritis.

Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms involved in immune activation and immune tolerance have laid the foundation for the development of new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. In particular, the dissection of the two-signal process of T-cell activation has identified distinct targets that may provide a means of blocking pathological autoimmune responses without causing sustained blockade of protective immune responses. These strategies have shown great promise in animal models for autoimmune diseases, and they are currently the focus of clinical investigation in several autoimmune diseases of humans.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with prominent involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joints which frequently leads to significant spine deformity and disability. The development of effective therapies for AS, particularly with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, has resulted in improved symptoms and functions for many patients, and clinical research increasingly suggests that effective therapy can also prevent destruction in the spine and other structures. Recent focus of disease classification in AS has emphasized that many individuals with features of inflammatory back pain but no visible changes on plain x-rays have active inflammatory disease when imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recent studies indicate that individuals with “non-radiographic” spondylitis can also respond to anti-inflammatory therapies. Several new agents are also showing promise for treatment of AS. These developments represent a significant advance in the management of this debilitating condition.

Cyclophosphamide (CTX) prevents progression of nephritis and prolongs survival in (NZB × NZW)F1 (B/W) mice and is used to treat humans with lupus nephritis. To compare the efficacy of CTLA4Ig with CTX and determine whether there is an incremental benefit to combining CTLA4Ig with CTX, we treated B/W mice with CTX, CTLA4Ig, or both agents. In mice with mild renal disease, treatment delayed the onset of proteinuria and prolonged survival in all groups. In mice with advanced renal disease, treatment with both agents reduced proteinuria in 71% of mice, whereas mice treated with either agent alone had no such improvement. Survival was also markedly improved among mice treated with both agents. Thus, combination treatment with CTX and CTLA4Ig is more effective than either agent alone in reducing renal disease and prolonging survival of B/W mice with advanced nephritis. This striking reversal of proteinuria is unprecedented in animal models of SLE.

The costimulatory interaction between CD28 on T cells and B7-related molecules on antigen presenting cells plays an important role in a broad range of functions of the immune system, including protective immunity, tolerance induction, allograft rejection, and the development of autoimmune diseases. Monoclonal antibodies to B7-1 and B7-2 have been used in vivo to examine the mechanisms underlying these processes and to evaluate costimulation antagonism as an approach to treatment of chronic autoimmune diseases. To determine whether anti-B7 mAb might elicit, or inhibit, a host immune response that could influence the effects of these antibodies in vivo, we assessed the immune response to rat anti-B7-1 and anti-B7-2 mAb in healthy (BALB/c) mice and in lupus-prone NZB/NZW F1(B/W) mice. In BALB/c mice, low doses (1-10 microg) of mAb to B7-1 and mAb to B7-2 elicited brisk immune responses that occurred earlier and were significantly greater than the immune response to an isotype-matched control rat mAb to ovalbumin. In contrast, at higher doses (100-500 microg), both anti-B7 mAb, but not the control mAb, blocked the mouse anti-rat response. No such blockade occurred in B/W mice, who generated a significant mouse anti-rat response even at very high doses of anti-B7 mAb (1,000-4,000 microg). Blockade of the immune response to the anti-B7 mAb in BALB/c mice apparently did not reflect generalized immune suppression, because high doses of these mAb had little, if any effect on the humoral immune response to another antigen. These findings indicate that: (1) mAb to B7-1 and B7-2 can elicit either a potent immune response or no immune response at all depending upon the dose administered; (2) blockade of the immune response to anti-B7 mAb may be more difficult in the setting of autoimmunity; and (3) neither anti-B7-1 nor anti-B7-2 causes generalized suppression of humoral immunity.

The development of monoclonal antibodies and the emergence of recombinant DNA technology has made it possible to identify and selectively inhibit distinct cell subsets, surface molecules and secreted products that contribute to normal and pathological immune responses. These advances have helped to clarify the mechanisms that promote autoimmune diseases. As a result, it is now possible to contemplate rational strategies for the treatment of these diseases. Some of these strategies are designed to influence the cell surface interactions that determine whether potentially autoreactive T cells become activated or tolerant following antigen stimulation. Other strategies are designed to augment or inhibit distinct cytokines that regulate autoimmunity. All of these strategies have shown promise in animal models for systemic lupus erythematosus, and they may soon be translated into effective new therapies for people.

The activation of naive CD4+ T cells requires two discrete signals: a signal delivered by the T cell receptor following recognition of antigen and an accessory signal transduced when costimulatory receptors interact with their ligands. Particularly important in the development of an immune response to foreign antigens is the T cell molecule CD28, which delivers a potent costimulus when engaged by ligands, B7-1 and B7-2, on antigen-presenting cells. It is interesting that blockade of B7 molecules, which disrupts interactions with CD28 and prevents delivery of the CD28 costimulus, also alters the immune responses to self antigens and prevents the development of clinical disease in murine models of systemic and organ-specific autoimunity. Herein we review the roles of CD28 and its B7 ligands in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, discuss efforts to treat animal models of autoimmunity by modifying the CD28 signal, and consider the mechanisms by which manipulation of the CD28 signal alters the course of experimental autoimmune disease.

The catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is rare and usually fatal. In this report, we describe an unusual patient who, 31 years after experiencing an atypical preeclampsia-eclampsia presentation known today as the HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets), developed CAPS, which seemed to complicate a diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome. She responded to repeated plasmapheresis over 3 years. Anticoagulants, corticosteroids, intravenous gamma globulin, and intravenous cyclophosphamide had all failed to halt the progression of CAPS, but repeated plasmapheresis not only halted the condition, but it led to the reversal of a leukoencephalopathy. The relationship between HELLP syndrome and CAPS is discussed, and possible pathogenetic mechanisms that explain the efficacy of repeated plasmapheresis in this setting are suggested. It is postulated that perhaps plasmapheresis, through removal of cytokines or other mediators, disrupts the interaction between phospholipid-protein complexes and endothelial cells. Repeated plasmapheresis should be considered in the most refractory cases of CAPS when more conventional treatment regimens have failed.

Background EULAR and ACR have jointly funded a project to develop systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria, aiming at earlier and more accurate classification of the disease. This abstract reports on an early phase of that project, aimed at collecting potential candidate criteria. Since SLE patients usually experience the onset and diagnosis as a critical life event, memories of this time appear remarkably accurate. Objectives The objective of this study was to identify early symptoms of SLE from the patient perspective. Methods As approved by the local ethics committee, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of German SLE patients. An anonymous self-report questionnaire was published in the “Schmetterling” the quarterly journal of the “Lupus erythematodes Selbsthilfegemeinschaft”, the German SLE patient association. Patients were asked for year of and age at their initial diagnosis. The questionnaire included typical organ manifestations, symptoms and autoantibodies. In addition, patients were asked to add additional symptoms in free text. For each symptom, boxes were provided to indicate the presence of the symptom before diagnosis, in the first year of diagnosis and at the time of completion of the questionnaire. Results 333 patient questionnaires were completed and mailed. Of the respondents, 93% were female. The respondents9 mean age at diagnosis was 36 years, their mean disease duration was 17 years. 83% reported to be definitely ANA-positive. Joint, skin and kidney involvement were reported at 82%, 66% and 33%, respectively. 22% of patients reported fibromyalgia. For the time before and shortly after diagnosis, more than 50% of the patients reported fatigue (89%), joint pain (87%), sensitivity to sunlight (79%), myalgias (76%), rash (71%), fever (54%), Raynaud9s (52%) and hair loss (51%). Approximately one third (37%) affirmed shortness of breath. Free text symptoms reported frequently before or early in diagnosis are listed in Table 1. Conclusions For a Caucasian European SLE patient population, the overall characteristics suggested meaningful representation. While many symptoms were reported as expected, a significant number of patients volunteered gastrointestinal complaints and symptoms of the central and peripheral nervous system. Solicitation of self reported information from the patient perspective has not been widely used in the development of classification criteria for SLE. These data add to the information on early SLE symptoms that may help improve classification of early SLE. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Criteria for the classification of SLE are being developed with the support of EULAR and ACR. Two independent exercises (expert-based Delphi exercise and data-driven cohort evaluation of early SLE and controls) were undertaken to generate candidate criteria, and then reduce them to a smaller set. Objectives To select a set of items that maximizes the likelihood of SLE in a person with an uncertain diagnosis. Methods A panel of seven international SLE experts (reflecting practice in Spain, France, Germany, United States, Canada and Mexico) was asked to rank 41 candidate criteria nominated in the Delphi and cohort studies. The rankings were presented at a face-to-face meeting of the expert panel and steering committee. A consensus meeting using nominal group technique (NGT) was conducted to reduce the list of criteria for consideration. Redundant or poorly performing criteria were removed. Results This expert panel NGT exercise reduced the candidate criteria for SLE classification from 41 to 21. The panel distinguished potential “entry criteria”, which would be required for classification, from other potential “additive criteria”, summarized in Table 1. Entry criteria were ANA by hep 2 immunofluorescence ≥1:80, and low C3 and/or low C4. Additional work is needed to refine definitions*, to evaluate their independence and relationships within domains, and to ascertain item weights. Conclusions This expert panel NGT exercise resulted in 21 candidate SLE classification criteria. Refinement of definitions, ability to cluster criteria into domains and weighting of criteria will be ascertained in the next phase. Acknowledgement This work was supported by EULAR and ACR Disclosure of Interest None declared

Objectives: This trial examined the efficacy of a stress management program in reducing neuroimaging markers of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity. Methods: A total of 121 patients with relapsing forms of MS were randomized to receive stress management therapy for MS (SMT-MS) or a wait-list control condition. SMT-MS provided 16 individual treatment sessions over 24 weeks, followed by a 24-week post-treatment follow-up. The primary outcome was the cumulative number of new gadolinium-enhancing (Gd) brain lesions on MRI at weeks 8, 16, and 24. Secondary outcomes included new or enlarging T2 MRI lesions, brain volume change, clinical exacerbation, and stress. Results: SMT-MS resulted in a reduction in cumulative Gd lesions (p 0.04) and greater numbers of participants remained free of Gd lesions during the treatment (76.8% vs 54.7%, p 0.02), compared to participants receiving the control treatment. SMT-MS also resulted in significantly reduced numbers of cumulative new T2 lesions (p 0.005) and a greater number of participants remaining free of new T2 lesions (69.5% vs 42.7%, p 0.006). These effects were no longer detectable during the 24-week post-treatment follow-up period. Conclusions: This trial indicates that SMT-MS may be useful in reducing the development of new MRI brain lesions while patients are in treatment. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that SMT-MS, a manualized stress management therapy program, reduced the number of Gd lesions in patients with MS during a 24-week treatment period. This benefit was not sustained beyond 24 weeks, and there were no clinical benefits. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00147446. Neurology ® 2012;79:412–419

Taken together, the wide range of rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions that can appear in association with cancer emphasizes that rheumatic disease is a major component of the spectrum of paraneoplastic manifestations. Although the pathogenetic mechanisms by which neoplasia causes these manifestations are only partially understood in select cases, it appears that many result from immune-mediated effects stimulated by tumor antigens of endocrine factors produced by tumors. The broad overlap in signs and symptoms of occult malignancy and systemic rheumatic disease, as well as the occurrence of distinct localized and systemic musculoskeletal and rheumatic syndromes in the presence of cancer, emphasizes the importance of considering and investigating the possibility of occult malignancy in the evaluation of patients with these symptoms. This is particularly important in older patients, those with atypical rheumatic disease, and those who do not respond appropriately to conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

CD45 and Fas regulate tyrosine phosphorylation and apoptotic signaling pathways, respectively. Mutation of an inhibitory wedge motif in CD45 (E613R) results in hyperresponsive thymocytes and B cells on the C57BL/6 background, but no overt autoimmunity, whereas Fas deletion results in a mild autoimmune disease on the same genetic background. In this study, we show that these two mutations cooperate in mice, causing early lethality, autoantibody production, and substantial lymphoproliferation. In double-mutant mice, this phenotype was dependent on both T and B cells. T cell activation required signaling in response to endogenous or commensal antigens, demonstrated by the introduction of a transgenic T cell receptor. Genetic deletion of B cells also prevented T cell activation. Similarly, T cells were necessary for B cell autoantibody production. However, B cells appeared to be intrinsically activated even in the absence of T cells, suggesting that they may drive the phenotype of these mice. These results reveal a requirement for careful control of B cell signaling and cell death in preventing inappropriate lymphocyte activation and autoimmunity.

Chronic autoimmune disease in humans is the result of a failure to control autoreactive immune cells in the periphery. This control is largely achieved by inhibition of newly activated and memory cells. A number of negative immune regulatory pathways have been characterized. The cell surface coreceptor cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) has emerged as a critical attenuator of T-cell activation and an essential component of the regulatory systems that serve to maintain peripheral tolerance. CTLA-4 expression is induced on the surface of T cells after they have received a costimulatory signal from antigen-presenting cells (APCs) via engagement of CD28 on the T-cell surface. CTLA-4 attenuates this costimulation by competing for CD28 ligands and through direct effects on APCs via the same ligands utilized by CD28. A large number of genetic association studies suggest that the CTLA-4 gene is a locus of susceptibility to autoimmune disease. However, specific functional defects in the CTLA-4 gene in patients have not been identified to date. Elucidating the role of CTLA-4 in immune tolerance has also led to a number of therapeutic applications, particularly in the treatment of malignancy and autoimmune disease.

Objective To assess whether R788, an orally bioavailable small molecule inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk)–dependent signaling, could modulate disease in lupus-prone (NZB × NZW)F1 (NZB/NZW) mice via inhibition of Fc receptor (FcR) and B cell receptor signaling. Methods R788 was administered to NZB/NZW mice before and after disease onset. Proteinuria, blood urea nitrogen levels, and autoantibody titers were examined periodically, and overall survival and renal pathologic features were assessed following long-term treatment (24–34 weeks). The distribution and immunophenotype of various splenic T cell and B cell subpopulations were evaluated at the time of study termination. Arthus responses in NZB/NZW mice pretreated with R788 or Fc-blocking antibody (anti-CD16/32) were also examined. Results When R788 was administered prior to or after disease onset, it delayed the onset of proteinuria and azotemia, reduced renal pathology and kidney infiltrates, and significantly prolonged survival of lupus-prone NZB/NZW mice; autoantibody titers were minimally affected throughout the study. Dose-dependent reductions in the numbers of CD4+ activated T cells expressing high levels of CD44 or CD69 were apparent in spleens from R788-treated mice. Minimal effects on the numbers of naive T cells expressing CD62 ligand and total CD8+ T cells per spleen were observed following long-term drug treatment. R788 pretreatment resulted in reduced Arthus responses in NZB/NZW mice, similar to results obtained in mice pretreated with FcR-blocking antibody. Conclusion We demonstrate that a novel Syk-selective inhibitor prevents the development of renal disease and treats established murine lupus nephritis. These data suggest that Syk inhibitors may be of therapeutic benefit in human lupus and related disorders.