1. The Surgeon General's warnings in outdoor cigarette advertizing: are they readable?
- Author
-
David, Ronald M. and Kendrick, Juliette S.
- Subjects
Cigarettes -- Advertising ,Smoking -- Laws, regulations and rules ,Outdoor advertising -- Laws, regulations and rules - Abstract
Federal law requires cigarette companies to display conspicuously in advertisements and on cigarette packages one of four health warnings from the Surgeon General regarding the health risks of smoking cigarettes. The ability to read such warnings on two outdoor media, billboards and advertisements on taxicabs, was investigated. On street billboards, 46 percent of the warning captions were readable, while on highway billboards, the readability dropped to 5 percent. However, the brand name and other notable images contained in the advertisement could be recognized more than 95 percent of the time. Observers of 100 taxicab advertisements were unable to read the Surgeon General's health warning in any of them, although brand name and notable imagery were identified in 95 percent of the ads. Factors influencing the inability to read outdoor advertisements included the size of the letters, the length of the health message, and the distance and movement between the ads and the observer. It is concluded that the legally mandated health warning is unreadable in a majority of current forms used in billboard and taxicab advertisements., Outdoor advertising media represent a major vehicle by which cigarette companies promote their products. We investigated the readability of the Surgeon General's warning in cigarette advertisements (ads) in two outdoor media: billboards and taxicab ads. In an experiment in metropolitan Atlanta under typical driving conditions, observes were able to read the entire health warning on 18 (46%) of 39 street billboards but on only two (5%) of 39 highway billboards. In contrast, the content of the ads (ie, brand name, other wording, and notable imagery) could be recognized under the same conditions on more than 95% of the billboards. In a similar study of 100 taxicab cigarette ads in New York City, observes were unable to read the health warning in any of the ads but were able to identify the brand name in all ads and notable imagery in 95% of the ads. Significant differences between the readability of the warning and identification of the advertising content persisted even when partially read warnings were considered to have been read. We conclude that the Surgeon General's warning is not readable in its current form in the vast majority of billboard and taxicab ads. Factors contributing to unreadability include the small size of the letters, the excessive length of the warnings, the distance between the viewers and the ads, and movement between the viewers and the ads.
- Published
- 1989