Search

TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene frequently mutated in human cancers and is generally associated with poor outcomes. TP53 mutations are found in approximately 5% to 10% of patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), more frequently observed in elderly patients and those with therapy-related AML. Despite recent advances in molecular profiling and the emergence of targeted therapies, TP53-mutated AML remains a challenge to treat. Current treatment strategies, including conventional chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, and venetoclax-based therapies, have shown limited efficacy in TP53-mutated AML, with low response rates and poor overall survival. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative option; however, its efficacy in TP53-mutated AML depends on comorbid conditions and disease status at transplantation. Novel therapeutic modalities, including immune-based therapies, did show promise in early-phase studies but did not translate into effective therapies in randomized controlled trials. This review provides a comprehensive overview of TP53 mutations in AML, outcomes based on allelic burden, clinical implications, and therapeutic challenges., Competing Interests: Competing interests TB: Served on the advisory board for Pfizer, Morphosys, and Takeda., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Twenty adults with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (RR) Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or chronic myeloid leukemia in lymphoid blast phase (CML-LBP), were treated with mini-hyperCVD, ponatinib, and blinatumomab. Complete molecular response was achieved in 78% of ND patients, while CR/CRi was achieved in 100% of RR and CML-LBP. The 3-year overall survival rate was 76% (95% CI, 47%-90%)., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Malignancies are reliant on glutamine as an energy source and a facilitator of aberrant DNA methylation. We demonstrate preclinical synergy of telaglenastat (CB-839), a selective glutaminase inhibitor, combined with azacytidine (AZA), followed by a single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 study in persons with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The dual primary endpoints evaluated clinical activity, safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints evaluated pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, overall survival, event-free survival and duration of response. The dose-escalation study included six participants and the dose-expansion study included 24 participants. Therapy was well tolerated and led to an objective response rate of 70% with (marrow) complete remission in 53% of participants and a median overall survival of 11.6 months, with evidence of myeloid differentiation in responders determined by single-cell RNA sequencing. Glutamine transporter solute carrier family 38 member 1 in MDS stem cells was associated with clinical responses and predictive of worse prognosis in a large MDS cohort. These data demonstrate the safety and efficacy of CB-839 and AZA as a combined metabolic and epigenetic approach in MDS. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03047993 ., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Venetoclax received full approval in October 2020 for use in older, unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) combined with either hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine. This ended a semi-centennial of stalled clinical progress and initiated a new treatment option with proven capacity to enhance response and prolong survival in older patients with AML. Despite widespread use of azacitidine-venetoclax (AZA-VEN), there is increasing appreciation that this regimen is myelosuppressive and associated with a higher risk of infectious complications than AZA alone. Key principles of initial management include prevention of tumor lysis syndrome in patients at high risk and minimizing infectious complications during induction. In the post-remission phase, limiting cumulative marrow suppression by allowing sufficient time between cycles for optimal marrow recovery and truncating the duration of venetoclax exposure for those with delayed blood count recovery have emerged as important axioms of effective care. This new addition to the How I Treat series casts a clinical spotlight on important challenges and dilemmas encountered in practice. We also outline a structured framework to assist in the safe management of AZA-VEN in the clinic., (Copyright © 2024 American Society of Hematology.)

Myelodysplastic neoplasms/syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of biologically distinct entities characterized by variable degrees of ineffective hematopoiesis. Recently, 2 classification systems (the 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid tTumours and the International Consensus Classification) further subcharacterized MDS into morphologically and genetically defined groups. Accurate diagnosis and subclassification of MDS require a multistep systemic approach. The International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) summarizes a contemporary, practical, and multimodal approach to MDS diagnosis and classification., (Copyright © 2024 United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment landscape of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is evolving rapidly. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy or doublets or triplets with targeted or immune therapies is the focus of numerous ongoing trials. The development of mutation-targeted therapies has greatly enhanced the treatment armamentarium, with FLT3 inhibitors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors improving outcomes in frontline and relapsed/refractory (RR) AML, and menin inhibitors showing efficacy in RR NPM1 mut and KMT2A-rearranged AML. With so many new drugs approved, the number of potential combinatorial approaches to leverage the maximal benefit of these agents has increased dramatically, while at the same time introducing clinical challenges, such as key preclinical and clinical data supporting the development of combinatorial therapy, how to optimally combine or sequence these novel agents, how to optimise dose and duration to maintain safety while enhancing efficacy, the optimal duration of therapy and the role of measurable residual disease in decision-making in both intensive and low-intensity therapy settings. In this review, we will outline the evidence leading to the approval of key agents in AML, their on-label current approvals and how they may be optimally combined in a safe and deliverable fashion to further improve outcomes in AML., (© 2024 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Targeted therapy development for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) requires an understanding of specific expression profiles. We collected flow cytometry data on 901 AML patients and recorded aberrant CD7 expression on leukaemic blasts. 263 (29.2%) had blasts positive for CD7. CD7+ AML was more likely to be adverse risk (64.6% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.0074) and less likely to be favourable risk (15.2% vs. 24.1%, p = 0.0074) by European LeukemiaNet 2022 criteria. Overall survival was inferior (11.9 [95% CI, 9.7-15.9] vs. 19.0 months [95% CI, 16.1-23.0], p = 0.0174). At relapse, 30.4% lost and 19.0% gained CD7, suggesting moderate instability over time., (© 2024 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Therapies for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia remain limited and outcomes poor, especially amongst patients who are ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapies., Patients and Methods: This phase 1b trial evaluated venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) inhibitor, plus cobimetinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Two-dimensional dose-escalation was performed for venetoclax dosed daily, and for cobimetinib dosed on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle., Results: Thirty patients (median [range] age: 71.5 years [60-84]) received venetoclax-cobimetinib. The most common adverse events (AEs; in ≥40.0% of patients) were diarrhea (80.0%), nausea (60.0%), vomiting (40.0%), febrile neutropenia (40.0%), and fatigue (40.0%). Overall, 66.7% and 23.3% of patients experienced AEs leading to dose modification/interruption or treatment withdrawal, respectively. The composite complete remission (CRc) rate (complete remission [CR] + CR with incomplete blood count recovery + CR with incomplete platelet recovery) was 15.6%; antileukemic response rate (CRc + morphologic leukemia-free state/partial remission) was 18.8%. For the recommended phase 2 dose (venetoclax: 600 mg; cobimetinib: 40 mg), CRc and antileukemic response rates were both 12.5%. Failure to achieve an antileukemic response was associated with elevated baseline phosphorylated ERK and MCL-1 levels, but not BCL-xL. Baseline mutations in ≥1 signaling gene or TP53 were noted in nonresponders and emerged on treatment. Pharmacodynamic biomarkers revealed inconsistent, transient inhibition of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway., Conclusion: Venetoclax-cobimetinib showed limited preliminary efficacy similar to single-agent venetoclax, but with added toxicity. Our findings will inform future trials of BCL-2/MAPK pathway inhibitor combinations., Competing Interests: Disclosure MYK is a consultant for AbbVie, Inc., Genentech, Inc., and F. Hoffmann La-Roche; is an advisory board member for F. Hoffmann La-Roche; holds shares from Reata Pharmaceuticals; has received honoraria from Amgen, AbbVie, Inc., and Genentech, Inc.; and has received research funding from AbbVie, Inc., Genentech, Inc., Eli Lilly, Cellectis, Calithera, Stemline, Threshold, Flexus Biosciences, Novartis, Ablynx, and Agios. MD, MO, JW, WH, DD, and HH are employees of Genentech, Inc. and may hold Roche stock or stock options. NGD has received research funding from Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Inc., Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Inc., Hanmi, Trovagene, Fate Therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, GlycoMimetics, Trillium, Kite Pharma, Aptose, Shattuck Labs, KAHR, ArcellX, Sanofi, Sumitomo, and ImmunoGen; and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, AbbVie, Inc., Astellas, Genentech, Inc., Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck Labs, ArcellX, Kite Pharma, Sumitomo, Caribou Biosciences, Sanofi, Rigel, Aptose, KURA, GlycoMimetics, and Agios. JSG has received research funding (for trials) from AbbVie, Inc., Genentech, Inc., Pfizer, Prelude, and AstraZeneca; and has served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Inc., Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Servier. BAJ is a consultant/advisor for AbbVie, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Inc., Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Kymera, Pfizer, Rigel, Servier, and Takeda; protocol steering committee for GlycoMimetics; data monitoring committee for Gilead; travel reimbursement/support from Rigel; and research funding to his institution from AbbVie, Inc., Amgen, Arog Pharmaceuticals, Aptose, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Forma Therapeutics, Forty-Seven, Genentech, Inc./Roche, Gilead, GlycoMimetics, Hanmi, Immune-Onc, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sigma Tau, and Treadwell. KWLY is a consultant for Astex, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Otsuka, Paladin, Pfizer, Shattuck Labs, Taiho, and Takeda; has received honorarium from AbbVie, Inc. and Novartis; and has received research funding from Astex, Forma Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Inc., Geron, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MedImmune, Novartis, Onconova, and Tolero. KRK, NV, SP, AT, AP, PF, and GV declare no competing financial interests. SA reports non-financial support from Roche/Genentech, Inc. during the conduct of the study; and has received personal fees from Roche Canada, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Palladin, and Lundbeck outside of the submitted work. GJR consulted for AbbVie, Inc., Amgen, Argenx, AstraZeneca, Bluebird Bio, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jasper Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Syndax, Takeda (IRC Chair), and Telix Pharma; and has received research funding from Janssen. DAP has received research funding from AbbVie, Inc. and has served as a consultant or advisory board member for AbbVie, Inc. and Genentech, Inc. JMB consulted for AbbVie, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astex, Pfizer, Astellas, Taiho, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. BLP has received research funding from Ambit Biosciences, Genentech, Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, and Cornerstone Pharmaceuticals; and is a consultant for Cornerstone Pharmaceuticals. RLO has received research support for trials from Astellas, Pfizer, Genentech, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo, and Cellectis; and consulted for AbbVie, Inc., Astellas, and Actinium. GM is a consultant for AbbVie, Inc., Celgene, Roche, Janssen, Astellas, Pfizer, and Incyte. W-JH is a former employee of Genentech, Inc. and may hold Roche stock; and is a current employee of Prelude Therapeutics. MGO is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche and may hold stock or stock options. MA consulted for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Syndax, GlycoMimetics, Oncoceutics, and Aptose; has received research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, GlycoMimetics; and holds stock from Reata, Oncoceutics/Chimerix and Aptose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Azacitidine (AZA) is an approved frontline therapy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS); however, poor survival denotes unmet needs to increase depth/duration of response (DOR)., Methods: This retrospective study with patient chart review evaluated AZA effectiveness in 382 treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS from a US electronic health record (EHR)-derived database. Responses were assessed using International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria; real-world equivalents were derived from EHRs. Primary endpoint was IWG 2006-based complete remission rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints were EHR-based CRR, IWG 2006- and EHR-based objective response rates (ORRs), duration of CR, DOR, progression-free survival, time-to-next-treatment, and overall survival (OS)., Results: Using IWG 2006 criteria, the CRR was 7.9% (n = 30); median duration of CR was 12.0 months (95% CI, 7.7-15.6). In poor cytogenetic risk (n = 101) and TP53 mutation (n = 46) subgroups, CRRs were 7.9% (n = 8) and 8.7% (n = 4), respectively. ORR was 62.8% (n = 240), including a hematologic improvement rate (HIR) of 46.9% (n = 179). Using EHR-based data, CRR was 3.7% (n = 14); median duration of CR was 13.5 months (95% CI, 4.5-21.5). ORR was 67.8% (n = 259), including an HIR of 29.3% (n = 112). Median follow-up was 12.9 months; median OS was 17.9 months (95% CI, 15.5-21.7)., Conclusions: Consistent with other studies, CRRs and median OS with AZA in treatment-naive patients with HR-MDS were low in this large, real-world cohort. Novel agents/combinations are urgently needed to improve these outcomes in HR-MDS., Competing Interests: Disclosure N.R., S.M., S.I., M.C., and R.K. are current equity holders at Gilead Sciences Inc. and were employed by Gilead Sciences Inc. at the time of this study. A.H.W. receives institutional research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Astex, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Novartis, Servier, and Syndax; is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, and is eligible for a fraction of the royalty stream related to venetoclax; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Astellas, BMS, and Novartis; and served on advisory boards for Abbvie, Agios, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Gilead Sciences Inc., Janssen, Macrogenics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Servier. D.A.S. received consulting fees from AbbVie, Affimed, Gilead Sciences Inc., Incyte, Intellisphere, Molecular Partners, PGEN Therapeutics, Takeda, and Zentalis; served on advisory boards for AvenCell, Bluebird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Jasper Therapeutics, Kite, Magenta Therapeutics, Nkarta, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax, and Syros; and has financial or nonfinancial interests in Aprea, Jazz, and Moffit. M.G. served on advisory boards for GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm, Sanofi, and TG Therapeutics. N.G.D. receives institutional research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, FATE Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., Glycomimetics, Hanmi, ImmunoGen, Novimmune, Pfizer, Servier, Trillium, and Trovagene; and received consulting fees from AbbVie, Agios, Amgen, Arog, Astellas, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Daichii-Sankyo, Genentech, Gilead Sciences Inc., ImmunoGen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Shattuck Labs, Syndax, and Trillium. Y.W. has received support for the current study from Gilead Sciences Inc.; and is a current equity holder in McKesson. P.V. has received support for the current study from Gilead Sciences Inc. and Scimentum., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hypomethylating agents (HMA) combined with venetoclax are an emerging therapeutic strategy for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS). The cytogenetic and molecular factors associated with outcomes with this combination for HR-MDS are incompletely understood., Experimental Design: We pooled patient data from 3 prospective trials evaluating HMA-venetoclax in HR-MDS to study associations between cytogenetic and molecular factors and overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and event-free survival (EFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time-to-event endpoints. Univariate and multivariate analyses using logistic regression (for ORR) or the Cox proportional hazards model (for OS and EFS) were used to identify associations between clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular factors and outcomes., Results: A total of 80 patients (52 HMA-naïve, 28 HMA-failure) were included. ORR was 90% in HMA-naïve and 57% in HMA-failure. Median OS was 28.2 and 8.3 months in HMA-naïve and HMA-failure, respectively. Median EFS was 17.9 and 5.5 months in HMA-naïve and HMA-failure, respectively. In addition, 24/52 (46%) of the HMA-naïve and 3/28 (11%) of the HMA-failure patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Factors associated with inferior outcomes were prior HMA failure, complex cytogenetics, trisomy 8, TP53 mutations, and RAS pathway mutations. Mutations in RNA splicing, DNA methylation, and ASXL1 appeared favorable. Blast percentage was not predictive of outcomes., Conclusions: Knowledge of cytogenetic and molecular alterations may help identify which patients with HR-MDS benefit the most from venetoclax., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Pivekimab sunirine (IMGN632) is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate comprising a high-affinity CD123 antibody, cleavable linker, and novel indolinobenzodiazepine pseudodimer payload. CD123 is overexpressed in several haematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukaemia. We present clinical data on pivekimab sunirine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia., Methods: This first-in-human, phase 1/2 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study enrolled participants aged 18 years or older at nine hospitals in France, Italy, Spain, and the USA with CD123+ haematological malignancies (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1); participants reported here were in a cohort of participants with acute myeloid leukaemia who were refractory to or had relapsed on one or more previous treatments for acute myeloid leukaemia. The 3 + 3 dose-escalation phase evaluated two dosing schedules: schedule A (once every 3 weeks, on day 1 of a 3-week cycle) and fractionated schedule B (days 1, 4, and 8 of a 3-week cycle). The dose-expansion phase evaluated two cohorts: one cohort given 0·045 mg/kg of bodyweight (schedule A) and one cohort given 0·090 mg/kg of bodyweight (schedule A). The primary endpoints were the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended phase 2 dose. Antileukaemia activity (overall response and a composite complete remission assessment) was a secondary endpoint. The study is ongoing and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03386513., Findings: Between Dec 29, 2017, and May 27, 2020, 91 participants were enrolled (schedule A, n=68; schedule B, n=23). 30 (44%) of schedule A participants were female and 38 (56%) were male; 60 (88%) were White, six (9%) were Black or African American, and two (3%) were other races. Pivekimab sunirine at doses of 0·015 mg/kg to 0·450 mg/kg in schedule A was administered in six escalating doses with no maximum tolerated dose defined; three dose-limiting toxicities were observed (reversible veno-occlusive disease; 0·180 mg/kg, n=1 and 0·450 mg/kg, n=1; and neutropenia; 0·300 mg/kg, n=1). Schedule B was not pursued further on the basis of comparative safety and antileukaemia findings with schedule A. The recommended phase 2 dose was selected as 0·045 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. At the recommended phase 2 dose (n=29), the most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (three [10%]), infusion-related reactions (two [7%]), and anaemia (two [7%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurring in 5% or more of participants treated at the recommended phase 2 dose were febrile neutropenia (two [7%]) and infusion-related reactions (two [7%]). Among 68 participants who received schedule A, one death (1%) was considered to be treatment-related (cause unknown; 0·300 mg/kg cohort). At the recommended phase 2 dose, the overall response rate was 21% (95% CI 8-40; six of 29) and the composite complete remission rate was 17% (95% CI 6-36; five of 29)., Interpretation: Pivekimab sunirine showed single-agent activity across multiple doses, with a recommended phase 2 dose of 0·045 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. These findings led to a phase 1b/2 study of pivekimab sunirine plus azacitidine and venetoclax in patients with CD123-positive acute myeloid leukaemia., Funding: ImmunoGen., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NGD reports consultancy for Agios, Astellas, KITE, AbbVie, Gilead, Jazz, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS, ImmunoGen, Syndax, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Trillium, Genentech, Stemline/Menarini, Celgene, Amgen, Pfizer, Servier, and Arog; and research funding from Astellas, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, KITE, Hanmi Pharm, AbbVie, Gilead, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS, ImmunoGen, Glycomimetics, Trillium, Genentech, Amgen, Pfizer, and Servier. PM reports consultancy for Daiichi Sankyo and Celgene; membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees for Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Celgene, Novartis, Karyopharm, Incyte, Janssen, Pfizer, and Teva; research support from Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Novartis, Karyopharm, Janssen, Pfizer, and Teva; being on a speaker's bureau for Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Novartis, Incyte, Janssen, Pfizer and Teva; and research funding from Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, and Teva. DJD reports research funding from AbbVie, Glycomimetics, and Novartis; and consultancy for Novartis, Amgen, Blueprint, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda. ESW reports being on an advisory board or consulting for AbbVie, BMS, CTI Biopharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Kite, Kura, Novartis, Rigel, Sellas, and Sumitomo Pharma; a speaker role for Astellas, Kura, and Pfizer; being on a data monitoring committee for AbbVie and Gilead; and being on a research committee for Gilead. NPa reports being on an advisory board for CTI Biopharma and Cambium Oncology; consultancy for CTI Biopharma; and research funding from Gilead, ONO Pharma, and AbbVie. ET reports consultancy for AbbVie, Janssen, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; and being on an advisory board for AbbVie, Janssen, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. KLS reports consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Jazz Arog, Pfizer, BerGenBio, Astellas, Novartis, Curis, Mablytics, Daiichi Sankyo, and Nkarta; and research funding from Jazz and Incyte. NPe reports consultancy for MustangBio, AbbVie, Celgene, Stemline Therapeutics, Novartis, and Incyte; research funding from MustangBio, Samus, AbbVie, Cellectis, Stemline Therapeutics, Novartis, Plexxikon, Daiichi-Sankyo, SagerStrong, Affymetrix, and Incyte; and honoraria from AbbVie, Celgene, and Stemline Therapeutics. AAL received research funding from AbbVie and Stemline Therapeutics; and consulting fees from Cimeio Therapeutics, IDRx, Jnana Therapeutics, N-of-One, and Qiagen. JET reports research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb and Novartis. MYK reports research funding from Allogene, Daiichi, Gilead, ImmunoGen, MEI Pharma, Precision Biosciences, Sanofi, Ablynx, Genentech, Cellectis, AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, Forty-Seven, and AstraZeneca; consultancy for Gilead, MEI Pharma, Sanofi, Janssen, Vincerx, Genentech, AbbVie, Stemline Therapeutics, and AstraZeneca; honoraria from BAKX Therapeutics, Genentech, AbbVie, and Stemline Therapeutics; and equity ownership, patents & royalties from Reata Pharmaceuticals. CMS, KW, GB, YD, KEM, and PAZ-M are employees of ImmunoGen. HMK reports honoraria from Pfizer, Takeda, Amphista, Amgen, Ascentage, Astellas, Agios, Biologix, Curis, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR, Medical LabCorp, Shenzhen Target, Stemline, Novartis, and AbbVie; and research funding from Jazz Pharma, BMS, Amgen, Ascentage, Agios, ImmunoGen, Cyclacel, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and AbbVie. LT-M declares no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hypomethylating agents are approved in higher-riskmyelodysplastic syndromes. The combination of a hypomethylating agent with venetoclax is standard of care in acute myeloid leukaemia. We investigated the safety and activity of the first totally oral combination of decitabine plus cedazuridine and venetoclax in patients with higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia., Methods: We did a single-centre, dose-escalation and dose-expansion, phase 1/2, clinical trial. Patients with treatment-naive higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (risk level categorised as intermediate-2 or higher by the International Prognostic Scoring System) with excess blasts (>5%). Treatment consisted of oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg on days 1-5 and venetoclax (variable doses of 100-400 mg, day 1 to 14, 28-day cycle). The primary outcomes were safety for the phase 1 part and the overall response for the phase 2 part of the study. The trial is ongoing and this analysis was not prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04655755, and is currently enrolling participants., Findings: Between Jan 21, 2021, and Jan 20, 2023, we enrolled 39 patients (nine in phase 1 and 30 in phase 2). The median age was 71 years (range 27-94), 28 (72%) patients were male, and 11 (28%) were female. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the recommended phase 2 dose was established as oral decitabine 35 mg plus cedazuridine 100 mg for 5 days and venetoclax (400 mg) for 14 days. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33 [85%] of 39), neutropenia (29 [74%]), and febrile neutropenia (eight [21%]). Four non-treatment-related deaths occurred on the study drugs due to sepsis (n=2), lung infection (n=1), and undetermined cause (n=1). The median follow-up time was 10·8 months (IQR 5·6-16·4). The overall response rate was 95% (95% CI 83-99; 37/39). 19 (49%) patients proceeded to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation., Interpretation: This early analysis suggests that the combination of oral decitabine plus cedazuridine with venetoclax for higher-risk-myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia is safe in most patients, with encouraging activity. Longer follow-up will be needed to confirm these data., Funding: MD Anderson Cancer Center, MDS/AML Moon Shot, Genentech/AbbVie, and Astex Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests GM-B declares research support from Takeda, Rigel, and IFN Therapeutics. KSC declares research funding from Amgen and consultancy fees from AbbVie. JI declares funding from the US National Institutes of Health, the Leukemia Research Foundation, and the US Department of Defense, and honoraria from AstraZeneca. KS declares consultancy fees from Novartis and honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceuticals and Amgen. NS declares grants from Takeda Oncology, Astellas Pharma, Xencor, Stemline Therapeutics, and Nexcure; consultancy fees from Pfizer, GSK, NKARTA, and Sanofi; and honoraria from Adaptive Biotechologies, Novartis, Amgen, Takeda, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Sanofi, and BeiGene. GCI declares consultancy fees from Novartis, Kura Oncology, and Nuprobe; and research funding from Celgene, Kura Oncology, Syndax, Merck, Cullinan, and Novartis. ND declares grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, and KITE; and consultancy fees from Daiichi-Sankyo, BMS, Pfizer, Gilead, Servier, Genentech, Astellas, AbbVie, ImmunoGen, Amgen, Trillium, Arog, Novartis, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Celgene, Syndax, Shattuck Labs, Agios, KITE, and Stemline/Menarini. TMK declares grants from BMS, Abbvie, Amgen, Ascentage Pharma Group, Astellas Pharma, DrenBio, Astex, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Incyte, Cellenkos, Cyclacel, Delta-Fly Pharma, Genentech, Genfleet, Glycomimetics, Iterion, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Pulmotect, Regeneron, and SELLAS; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, PinotBio, Pukmotect, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier; and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Daiichi Sankyo, DAVA Oncology, Delta-Fly, DrenBio, Genentech, Genfleet, Genzyme, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Liberum, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Sanofi-Aventis, SELLAS, and Servier. FR declares research funding from ASTEX and TAIHO. EJ received research grants from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Pfizer, and Takeda; and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, BMS, Genentech, Incyte, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. HMK declares research funding from Abbvie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Immunogen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; and honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Amphista, Ascentage, Astellas, Biologix, Curis, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, KAHR Medical, Labcorp, Novartis, Pfizer, Precision Biosciences, Shenzhen Target Rx, Stemline, and Takeda. GG-M declares research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Abbvie, BMS, Genentech, Aprea Therapeutics, Curis, and Gilead Sciences; consultancy fees from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, and BMS; and honoraria from Astex Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron Pharma, Abbvie, Novartis, Gilead Sciences, Curis, Genentech, and BMS. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and venetoclax (Ven) represent the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk classifications have been validated for patients treated with intensive therapy. In this study, we validate a recently proposed new molecular prognostic risk signature (mPRS) for patients with AML treated with HMAs and Ven. This classification allocated patients to favorable, intermediate (N/KRAS or FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutations), and lower (TP53 mutations) benefit groups. We retrospectively analyzed 159 patients treated with HMA and Ven. The mPRS classification allocated 74 (47%), 31 (19%), and 54 (34%) patients to the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively. The overall response rate was 71% (86%, 54%, and 59% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) times were 30 and 19 months, respectively, in the higher-benefit group; 12 and 8 months in the intermediate-benefit group; and 5 and 4 months in the lower-benefit group (P < .001). The C-index for OS and EFS was higher when stratifying patients according to mPRS classification than with the ELN 2022 classification. The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 35%, 70%, and 60% in the higher, intermediate, and lower-benefit groups, respectively (P = .005). The mPRS classification accurately segregated groups of patients with AML treated with HMA plus Ven. In these patients, N/KRAS and TP53 mutations appear to negatively affect outcomes; therefore, new treatment approaches are warranted., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

The tumor suppressor TP53 is frequently inactivated in a mutation-independent manner in cancers and is reactivated by inhibiting its negative regulators. We here cotarget MDM2 and the nuclear exporter XPO1 to maximize transcriptional activity of p53. MDM2/XPO1 inhibition accumulated nuclear p53 and elicited a 25- to 60-fold increase of its transcriptional targets. TP53 regulates MYC , and MDM2/XPO1 inhibition disrupted the c-MYC-regulated transcriptome, resulting in the synergistic induction of apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Unexpectedly, venetoclax-resistant AMLs express high levels of c-MYC and are vulnerable to MDM2/XPO1 inhibition in vivo. However, AML cells persisting after MDM2/XPO1 inhibition exhibit a quiescence- and stress response-associated phenotype. Venetoclax overcomes that resistance, as shown by single-cell mass cytometry. The triple inhibition of MDM2, XPO1, and BCL2 was highly effective against venetoclax-resistant AML in vivo. Our results propose a novel, highly translatable therapeutic approach leveraging p53 reactivation to overcome nongenetic, stress-adapted venetoclax resistance.

Mutations in splicing factor (SF) genes SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, and ZRSR2 are now considered adverse risk in the European LeukemiaNet 2022 acute myeloid leukemia (AML) risk stratification. The prognostic impact of SF mutations in AML has been predominantly derived from younger patients treated with intensive (INT) therapy. We evaluated 994 patients with newly diagnosed AML, including 266 (27%) with a SFmut. Median age was 67 years overall, with patients with SFmut being older at 72 years. SRSF2 (n = 140, 53%) was the most common SFmut. In patients treated with INT, median relapse-free survival (RFS) (9.6 vs 21.4 months, P = .04) and overall survival (OS) (15.9 vs 26.7 months, P = .06) were shorter for patients with SFmut than without SFwt, however this significance abrogated when evaluating patients who received venetoclax with INT therapy (RFS 15.4 vs 20.3 months, P = .36; OS 19.6 vs 30.7 months, P = .98). In patients treated with LI, median RFS (9.3 vs 7.7 months, P = .35) and OS (12.3 vs 8.5 months, P = .14) were similar for patients with and without SFmut , and outcomes improved in all groups with venetoclax. On multivariate analysis, SFmut did not affect hazards of relapse and death for INT arm but reduced both these hazards in LI arm. In a large AML data set with >60% of patients receiving venetoclax with LI/INT therapy, SFmut had no independent negative prognostic impact. Newer prognostic models that consider LI therapy and use of venetoclax among other factors are warranted., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Estimates of real-world incidence and reported risk factors vary substantially., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 419 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with anti-PD-(L)1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Clinical, imaging, and microbiological data were evaluated by multidisciplinary adjudication teams. The primary outcome of interest was grade ≥2 (CTCAEv5) pneumonitis. Clinicopathologic variables, tobacco use, cancer therapies, and preexisting lung disease were assessed for univariate effects using Cox proportional hazards models. We created multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to assess risk factors for pneumonitis and mortality. Pneumonitis, pneumonia, and progression were modeled as time-dependent variables in mortality models., Results: We evaluated 419 patients between 2013 and 2021. The cumulative incidence of pneumonitis was 9.5% (40/419). In a multivariate model, pneumonitis increased the risk for mortality (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.5), after adjustment for disease progression (HR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.4-1.8) and baseline shortness of breath (HR 1.5, 95% CI, 1.2-2.0). Incomplete resolution was more common with more severe pneumonitis. Interstitial lung disease was associated with higher risk for pneumonitis (HR 5.4, 95% CI, 1.1-26.6), particularly in never smokers (HR 26.9, 95% CI, 2.8-259.0)., Conclusion: Pneumonitis occurred at a high rate and significantly increased mortality. Interstitial lung disease, particularly in never smokers, increased the risk for pneumonitis., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

The guidelines for classification, prognostication, and response assessment of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) have all recently been updated. In this report on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) we summarize these developments. We first critically examine the updated World Health Organization (WHO) classification and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of MDS. We then compare traditional and molecularly based risk MDS risk assessment tools. Lastly, we discuss limitations of criteria in measuring therapeutic benefit and highlight how the International Working Group (IWG) 2018 and 2023 response criteria addressed these deficiencies and are endorsed by the icMDS. We also address the importance of patient centered care by discussing the value of quality-of-life assessment. We hope that the reader of this review will have a better understanding of how to classify MDS, predict clinical outcomes and evaluate therapeutic outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera, GSK, Rigel, Sierra Oncology; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on several patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. Gail Roboz: Consultancy: Abbvie, Amgen, Argenx, Astra Zeneca, Bluebird Bio, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Jasper Pharmaceuticals, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Rigel, Roche, Syndax, Takeda (IRC Chair), Telix Pharma Research support: Janssen. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Fabio Efficace had a consultancy or advisory role for AbbVie, Incyte, Janssen, and Syros, outside the submitted work. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H. Wei receives such a financial benefit. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Magrolimab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody against cluster of differentiation 47, an antiphagocytic signal used by cancer cells to evade phagocytosis. Azacitidine upregulates prophagocytic signals on AML cells, further increasing phagocytosis when combined with magrolimab. We report final phase Ib data for magrolimab with azacitidine in patients with untreated AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated AML, including TP53 -mutant AML, received magrolimab intravenously as an initial dose (1 mg/kg, days 1 and 4), followed by 15 mg/kg once on day 8 and 30 mg/kg once weekly or every 2 weeks as maintenance. Azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and proportion with complete remission (CR)., Results: Eighty-seven patients were enrolled and treated; 72 (82.8%) had TP53 mutations with a median variant allele frequency of 61% (range, 9.8-98.7). Fifty-seven (79.2%) of TP53 -mutant patients had European LeukemiaNet 2017 adverse-risk cytogenetics. Patients received a median of 4 (range, 1-39) cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included constipation (49.4%), nausea (49.4%), and diarrhea (48.3%). Thirty (34.5%) experienced anemia, and the median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.9 g/dL (range, -3.6 to 2.5 g/dL). Twenty-eight (32.2%) patients achieved CR, including 23 (31.9%) patients with TP53 mutations. The median overall survival in TP53- mutant and wild-type patients were 9.8 months and 18.9 months, respectively., Conclusion: Magrolimab with azacitidine was relatively well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, including those with TP53 mutations, warranting further evaluation of magrolimab with azacitidine in AML. The phase III randomized ENHANCE-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04778397) and ENHANCE-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05079230) studies are recruiting frontline patients with AML.

Background: The treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) has evolved in the past decade, as reflected in an increased use of various therapeutic agents that could potentially impact patient outcomes., Methods: In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the pattern of therapy and its possible impact on the survival of patients with MF at their institution. Patients (n = 802) with newly diagnosed, chronic, overt MF (MF fibrosis grade ≥2, <10% blasts) seen at their cancer center between 2000 and 2020 were included., Results: Overall, 492 of the included patients (61%) initiated MF-directed therapy during follow-up. The most frequent initial therapy was the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (44% of treated patients), investigational agents excluding JAK inhibitors (21%), immunomodulatory agents (18%), other investigational JAK inhibitors (10%), and others (7%). Overall survival was superior for patients who received initial ruxolitinib therapy, with a median survival of 72 months versus approximately 50 months for the remaining approaches, excluding the last group. Thirty-two percent of patients required subsequent therapy (n = 159). The longest survival since the start of second-line therapy was observed in patients who initiated salvage ruxolitinib (median, 35 months; 95% CI, 25-45 months)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated improved outcomes of patients with MF who received treatment with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2) has a very poor prognosis. Determinants of clinical outcomes and optimal treatment remain uncertain. We retrospectively reviewed 108 cases of AML with inv(3)/t(3;3) and evaluated clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes: 53 newly diagnosed (ND) AML and 55 relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Median age was 55 years. White blood cell (WBC) count ≥20x109/L and platelet count ≥140x109/L was observed in 25% and 32% of ND patients, respectively. Anomalies involving chromosome 7 were identified in 56% of patients. The most frequently mutated genes were SF3B1, PTPN11, NRAS, KRAS and ASXL1. In ND patients, the composite complete remission (CRc) rate was 46% overall; 46% with high-intensity treatments and 47% with lowintensity treatments. The 30-day mortality was 14% and 0%, with high- and low-intensity treatment, respectively. In R/R patients, the CRc rate was 14%. Venetoclax based-regimens were associated with a CRc rate of 33%. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 8.8% and 7.1% in ND and R/R patients, respectively. The 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 81.7% overall. Older age, high WBC, high peripheral blast count, secondary AML and KRAS, ASXL1, DNMT3A mutations were associated with worse OS in univariable analyses. The 5-year OS rates were 44% and 6% with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in CR1, respectively. AML with inv(3)/t(3;3) is associated with low CR rates, very high risk of relapse and dismal long-term survival. Intensive chemotherapy and hy pomethylating agents provide similar rates of remission and patients achieving CR benefit from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first CR.

Approximately 5% to 15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients have TP53 gene mutations (TP53m), which are associated with very poor outcomes. Adults (≥18 years) with a new AML diagnosis were included from a nationwide, de-identified, real-world database. Patients receiving first-line therapy were divided into three cohorts: venetoclax (VEN) + hypomethylating agents (HMAs; Cohort A), intensive chemotherapy (Cohort B), or HMA without VEN (Cohort C). A total of 370 newly diagnosed AML patients with TP53m (n = 124), chromosome 17p deletion (n = 166), or both (n = 80) were included. The median age was 72 years (range, 24-84); most were male (59%) and White (69%). Baseline bone marrow (BM) blasts were ≤30%, 31%-50%, and >50% in 41%, 24%, and 29% of patients in Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. BM remission (<5% blasts) with first-line therapy was reported in 54% of patients (115/215) overall, and 67% (38/57), 62% (68/110), and 19% (9/48) for respective cohorts (median BM remission duration: 6.3, 6.9, and 5.4 months). Median overall survival (95% CI) was 7.4 months (6.0-8.8) for Cohort A, 9.4 months (7.2-10.4) for Cohort B, and 5.9 months (4.3-7.5) for Cohort C. There were no differences in survival by treatment type after adjusting for the effects of relevant covariates (Cohort A vs. C adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.3; Cohort A vs. B aHR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.5; and Cohort C vs. B aHR = 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6). Patients with TP53m AML have dismal outcomes with current therapies, demonstrating the high unmet need for improved treatments., (© 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The safety and efficacy of combining the isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) inhibitor ivosidenib (IVO) with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN; IVO + VEN) ± azacitidine (AZA; IVO + VEN + AZA) were evaluated in four cohorts of patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies (n = 31). Most (91%) adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The maximal tolerated dose was not reached. Composite complete remission with IVO + VEN + AZA versus IVO + VEN was 90% versus 83%. Among measurable residual disease (MRD)-evaluable patients (N = 16), 63% attained MRD--negative remissions; IDH1 mutation clearance occurred in 64% of patients receiving ≥5 treatment cycles (N = 14). Median event-free survival and overall survival were 36 [94% CI, 23-not reached (NR)] and 42 (95% CI, 42-NR) months. Patients with signaling gene mutations appeared to particularly benefit from the triplet regimen. Longitudinal single-cell proteogenomic analyses linked cooccurring mutations, antiapoptotic protein expression, and cell maturation to therapeutic sensitivity of IDH1-mutated clones. No IDH isoform switching or second-site IDH1 mutations were observed, indicating combination therapy may overcome established resistance pathways to single-agent IVO., Significance: IVO + VEN + AZA is safe and active in patients with IDH1-mutated myeloid malignancies. Combination therapy appears to overcome resistance mechanisms observed with single-agent IDH-inhibitor use, with high MRD-negative remission rates. Single-cell DNA ± protein and time-of-flight mass-cytometry analysis revealed complex resistance mechanisms at relapse, highlighting key pathways for future therapeutic intervention. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 247., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Biological events that contribute to the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are becoming increasingly characterized and are being translated into rationally designed therapeutic strategies. Herein, we provide updates from the first International Workshop on MDS (iwMDS) of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS) detailing recent advances in understanding the genetic landscape of MDS, including germline predisposition, epigenetic and immune dysregulation, the complexities of clonal hematopoiesis progression to MDS, as well as novel animal models of the disease. Connected to this progress is the development of novel therapies targeting specific molecular alterations, the innate immune system, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. While some of these agents have entered clinical trials (e.g., splicing modulators, IRAK1/4 inhibitors, anti-CD47 and anti-TIM3 antibodies, and cellular therapies), none have been approved for MDS. Additional preclinical and clinical work is needed to develop a truly individualized approach to the care of MDS patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Maximilian Stahl consulted for Curis Oncology and Boston Consulting; served on the advisory board for Novartis and Kymera; and participated in GME activity for Novartis, Curis Oncology, Haymarket Media and Clinical care options (CCO). Elizabeth A. Griffiths has received honoraria for advisory board membership from AbbVie, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis, Celgene/BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Novartis, Picnic Health, Takeda Oncology, Taiho Oncology. EAG has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Blueprint Medicines, Genentech Inc., and honoraria for CME activities from Physicians Educational Resource, MediComWorldwide, American Society of Hematology, AAMDS International Foundation. Ravindra Majeti is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Syros Pharmaceuticals, TenSixteen Bio, Roche, and Cullgen Inc. and is an inventor on a number of patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. receives research support from Gilead Sciences. Ravindra Majeti. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics. Stephanie Halene consulted for Forma Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski is a consultant and received research funding from Kymera Therapeutics, Kurome Therapeutics, Captor Therapeutics, and Tolero Therapeutics. Daniel T. Starczynowski has equity in Kurome Therapeutics. David A. Sallman served on the advisory board of Aprea, AvenCell, BlueBird Bio, BMS, Intellia, Kite, Novartis, Shattuck Labs, Servier, Syndax. David A. Sallman served as a consultant for AbbVie, Magenta, Molecular Partners AG, Takeda and on the speakers' bureau for BMS, Incyte, Servier; David A. Sallman received research funding from Aprea, Jazz. Mrinal Patnaik received research funding from Kura Oncology and StemLine Pharmaceuticals. Andrew Brunner received consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Acceleron, Agios, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene/BMS, Keros Therapeutics, Taiho, Gilead. Andrew Brunner has research support from the NIH SPORE in Myeloid Malignancies, and from the Edward P. Evans Foundation. Tae Kon Kim received research funding from Nextcure and is a consultant for Agenus. Alan List is employed by and has equity in Precision BioSciences, and has served as a consultant for Halia Therapeutics, CTI Biopharma, Aileron. Naval Daver has received research funding from Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE therapeutics, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, Trillium, and ImmunoGen and has served in a consulting or advisory role for Daiichi-Sankyo, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Arog, Pfizer, Novartis, Jazz, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, Immunogen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, Shattuck labs, and Agios. Guillermo Sanz received honoraria, advisory board membership or consultation fees from AbbVie, BMS, ExCellThera, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda and participated in sponsored speaker's bureau for BMS, Novartis, and Takeda. Mikkael A. Sekeres has served on advisory boards for BMS, Novartis, Kurome, and Gilead. Pierre Fenaux received research funding from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Janssen. Pierre Fenaux had a consultancy with and received honoraria from BMS, Abbvie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis. Omar Abdel-Wahab has served as a consultant for H3B Biomedicine, Foundation Medicine Inc., Merck, Prelude Therapeutics, and Janssen, and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Envisagenics Inc., AIChemy, Harmonic Discovery Inc., and Pfizer Boulder; Omar Abdel-Wahab has received prior research funding from H3B Biomedicine and LOXO Oncology unrelated to the current manuscript. Andrew H.Wei has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Jazz, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Abbvie, Servier, Gilead, BMS, Shoreline, Macrogenics, Novartis and Agios; receives research funding to the Institution from Novartis, Abbvie, Servier, Janssen, BMS, Syndax, Astex, Astra Zeneca, Amgen; serves on speaker's bureaus for Abbvie, Novartis, BMS, Servier, Astellas; Andrew H.Wei is an employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI). WEHI receives milestone and royalty payments related to the development of Venetoclax. Current and past employees of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute may be eligible for financial benefits related to these payments. Andrew H.Wei receives such a financial benefit. Valeria Santini served in advisory boards from Abbvie, BMS, Geron, Gilead,Menarini, Novartis, Servier, Syros, ad received research support from BMS. Amer M. Zeidan received research funding (institutional) from Celgene/BMS, Abbvie, Astex, Pfizer, Medimmune/AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardiff oncology, Incyte, Takeda, Novartis, Aprea, and ADC Therapeutics. AMZ participated in advisory boards, and/or had a consultancy with and received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka, Pfizer, Celgene/BMS, Jazz, Incyte, Agios, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Acceleron, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, Cardinal Health, Taiho, Seattle Genetics, BeyondSpring, Cardiff Oncology, Takeda, Ionis, Amgen, Janssen, Epizyme, Syndax, Gilead, Kura, Chiesi, ALX Oncology, BioCryst, Notable, Orum, and Tyme. AMZ served on clinical trial committees for Novartis, Abbvie, Gilead, BioCryst, Abbvie, ALX Oncology, Geron and Celgene/BMS. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute receives research funding for the laboratory of Dr. Hourigan from Sellas and from the Foundation of the NIH AML MRD Biomarkers Consortium. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with rearrangement of lysine methyltransferase 2a gene (KMT2Ar) is characterized by chemotherapy resistance and high rates of relapse. However, additional causes of treatment failure or early mortality have not been well-defined in this entity., Methods: In a retrospective analysis, causes and rates of early mortality following induction treatment were compared between a cohort of adults with KMT2Ar AML (N = 172) and an age-matched cohort of patients with normal karyotype AML (N = 522)., Results: The 60-day mortality in patients with KMT2Ar AML was 15% compared with 7% with normal karyotype (p = .04). We found a significantly higher occurrence of major bleeding events (p = .005) and total bleeding events (p = .001) in KMT2Ar AML compared with diploid AML. Among evaluable patients with KMT2Ar AML, 93% exhibited overt disseminated intravascular coagulopathy compared with 54% of patients with a normal karyotype before death (p = .03). In a multivariate analysis, KMT2Ar and a monocytic phenotypic were the only independent predictors of any bleeding event in patients who died within 60 days (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-10.4; p = .03; odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 1-1-9.4; p = .04, respectively)., Conclusion: In conclusion, early recognition and aggressive management of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy and coagulopathy are important considerations that could mitigate the risk of death during induction treatment in KMT2Ar AML., Plain Language Summary: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with rearrangement of KMT2A is characterized by chemotherapy resistance and high rates of relapse. However, additional causes of treatment failure or early mortality have not been well-defined in this entity. In this article, that KMT2A-rearranged AML is demonstrably associated with higher early mortality and an increased risk of bleeding and coagulopathy, specifically, disseminated intravascular coagulation, compared with normal karyotype AML. These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring and mitigating coagulopathy in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia similar to what is done in acute promyelocytic leukemia., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Comprehensive investigation of CD8+ T cells in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is essential for developing immunotherapeutic strategies beyond immune checkpoint blockade. Herein, we performed single-cell RNA profiling of CD8+ T cells from 3 healthy bone marrow donors and 23 newly diagnosed (NewlyDx) and 8 relapsed/refractory (RelRef) patients with AML. Cells coexpressing canonical exhaustion markers formed a cluster constituting <1% of all CD8+ T cells. We identified two effector CD8+ T-cell subsets characterized by distinct cytokine and metabolic profiles that were differentially enriched in NewlyDx and RelRef patients. We refined a 25-gene CD8-derived signature correlating with therapy resistance, including genes associated with activation, chemoresistance, and terminal differentiation. Pseudotemporal trajectory analysis supported enrichment of a terminally differentiated state in CD8+ T cells with high CD8-derived signature expression at relapse or refractory disease. Higher expression of the 25-gene CD8 AML signature correlated with poorer outcomes in previously untreated patients with AML, suggesting that the bona fide state of CD8+ T cells and their degree of differentiation are clinically relevant. Immune clonotype tracking revealed more phenotypic transitions in CD8 clonotypes in NewlyDx than in RelRef patients. Furthermore, CD8+ T cells from RelRef patients had a higher degree of clonal hyperexpansion associated with terminal differentiation and higher CD8-derived signature expression. Clonotype-derived antigen prediction revealed that most previously unreported clonotypes were patient-specific, suggesting significant heterogeneity in AML immunogenicity. Thus, immunologic reconstitution in AML is likely to be most successful at earlier disease stages when CD8+ T cells are less differentiated and have greater capacity for clonotype transitions., (©2023 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Magrolimab is a monoclonal antibody that blocks cluster of differentiation 47, a don't-eat-me signal overexpressed on cancer cells. Cluster of differentiation 47 blockade by magrolimab promotes macrophage-mediated phagocytosis of tumor cells and is synergistic with azacitidine, which increases expression of eat-me signals. We report final phase Ib data in patients with untreated higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) treated with magrolimab and azacitidine (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03248479)., Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated Revised International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-/high-/very high-risk MDS received magrolimab intravenously as a priming dose (1 mg/kg) followed by ramp-up to a 30 mg/kg once-weekly or once-every-2-week maintenance dose. Azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 was administered intravenously/subcutaneously once daily on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle. Primary end points were safety/tolerability and complete remission (CR) rate., Results: Ninety-five patients were treated. Revised International Prognostic Scoring System risk was intermediate/high/very high in 27%, 52%, and 21%, respectively. Fifty-nine (62%) had poor-risk cytogenetics and 25 (26%) had TP53 mutation. The most common treatment-emergent adverse effects included constipation (68%), thrombocytopenia (55%), and anemia (52%). Median hemoglobin change from baseline to first postdose assessment was -0.7 g/dL (range, -3.1 to +2.4). CR rate and overall response rate were 33% and 75%, respectively. Median time to response, duration of CR, duration of overall response, and progression-free survival were 1.9, 11.1, 9.8, and 11.6 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with 17.1-month follow-up. In TP53 -mutant patients, 40% achieved CR with median OS of 16.3 months. Thirty-four patients (36%) had allogeneic stem-cell transplant with 77% 2-year OS., Conclusion: Magrolimab + azacitidine was well tolerated with promising efficacy in patients with untreated higher-risk MDS, including those with TP53 mutations. A phase III trial of magrolimab/placebo + azacitidine is ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04313881 [ENHANCE]).

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model for survival in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were treated with lower-intensity chemotherapy regimens., Methods: The authors reviewed all older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML who received lower-intensity chemotherapy from 2000 until 2020 at their institution. A total of 1462 patients were included. They were divided (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 1088) and a validation group (n = 374)., Results: In the training cohort of 1088 patients (median age, 72 years), the multivariate analysis identified 11 consistent independent adverse factors associated with survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, existence of previous myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasms, poor performance status, pulmonary comorbidity, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis, and therapy not containing venetoclax. The 3-year survival rates were 52%, 24%, 10%, and 1% in favorable, intermediate, poor, and very poor risk, respectively. This survival model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients in whom molecular mutation profiles were performed in more recent times, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified IDH2 (favorable), NPM1 (favorable), and TP53 (unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors., Conclusion: The proposed survival model with lower-intensity chemotherapy in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML may help to advise patients on their expected outcome, to propose different strategies in first complete remission, and to compare the results of different existing or future investigational therapies., Plain Language Summary: Lower intensity therapy can be considered for older patients to avoid severe toxicities and adverse events. However, survival prediction in AML was commonly developed in patients who received intensive chemotherapy. In this study, we have proposed a survival model to guide therapeutic approach in older patients who received lower-intensity therapy., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

This phase 1b trial (NCT02670044) evaluated venetoclax-idasanutlin in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Two-dimensional dose escalation (DE, n = 50) was performed for venetoclax daily with idasanutlin on days 1 to 5 in 28-day cycles, followed by dosing schedule optimization (n = 6) to evaluate reduced venetoclax schedules (21-/14-day dosing). Common adverse events (occurring in ≥40% of patients) included diarrhea (87.3% of patients), nausea (74.5%), vomiting (52.7%), hypokalemia (50.9%), and febrile neutropenia (45.5%). During DE, across all doses, composite complete remission (CRc; CR + CR with incomplete blood count recovery + CR with incomplete platelet count recovery) rate was 26.0% and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rate was 12%. For anticipated recommended phase 2 doses (venetoclax 600 mg + idasanutlin 150 mg; venetoclax 600 mg + idasanutlin 200 mg), the combined CRc rate was 34.3% and the MLFS rate was 14.3%. Pretreatment IDH1/2 and RUNX1 mutations were associated with higher CRc rates (50.0% and 45.0%, respectively). CRc rate in patients with TP53 mutations was 20.0%, with responses noted among those with co-occurring IDH and RUNX1 mutations. In 12 out of 36 evaluable patients, 25 emergent TP53 mutations were observed; 22 were present at baseline with low TP53 variant allele frequency (median 0.0095% [range, 0.0006-0.4]). Venetoclax-idasanutlin showed manageable safety and encouraging efficacy in unfit patients with R/R AML. IDH1/2 and RUNX1 mutations were associated with venetoclax-idasanutlin sensitivity, even in some patients with co-occurring TP53 mutations; most emergent TP53 clones were preexisting. Our findings will aid ongoing/future trials of BCL-2/MDM2 inhibitor combinations. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02670044., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: TP53 mutations, which are present in 5% to 10% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), are associated with treatment resistance and poor outcomes. First-line therapies for TP53-mutated (TP53m) AML consist of intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA), or venetoclax combined with HMA (VEN + HMA)., Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe and compare treatment outcomes in newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with TP53m AML. Randomized controlled trials, single-arm trials, prospective observational studies, and retrospective studies were included that reported on complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DoR), and overall response rate (ORR) among patients with TP53m AML receiving first-line treatment with IC, HMA, or VEN + HMA., Results: Searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 3006 abstracts, and 17 publications describing 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random-effects models were used to pool response rates, and time-related outcomes were analyzed with the median of medians method. IC was associated with the greatest CR rate of 43%, and CR rates were 33% for VEN + HMA and 13% for HMA. Rates of CR/CRi were comparable for IC (46%) and VEN + HMA (49%) but were lower for HMA (13%). Median OS was uniformly poor across treatments: IC, 6.5 months; VEN + HMA, 6.2 months; and HMA, 6.1 months. For IC, the EFS estimate was 3.7 months; EFS was not reported for VEN + HMA or HMA. The ORR was 41% for IC, 65% for VEN + HMA, and 47% for HMA. DoR was 3.5 months for IC, 5.0 months for VEN + HMA, and was not reported for HMA., Conclusions: Despite improved responses seen with IC and VEN + HMA compared to HMA, survival was uniformly poor, and clinical benefits were limited across all treatments for patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve TP53m AML, demonstrating a significant need for improved treatment for this difficult-to-treat population., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Patients with higher risk chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have limited therapeutic options beyond hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Regimens based on a backbone of cladribine (CLAD), low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), and an HMA are effective low-intensity therapies for acute myeloid leukemia (AML)., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review to evaluate the efficacy of CLAD/LDAC/HMA in CMML and secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) arising from CMML. Responses were evaluated according to the 2006 International Working Group criteria for CMML and the 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria for AML. The overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), and duration of response were evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Patients were stratified on the basis of prior HMA exposure., Results: The authors identified 21 patients with CMML (eight with HMA-naive CMML and 13 with HMA-failure CMML) and 33 patients with sAML (11 with HMA-naive sAML and 22 with HMA-failure sAML) treated with CLAD/LDAC/HMA-based regimens. The CMML cohort was enriched for high-risk features (proliferative type, elevated blasts, and RAS/MAPK mutations). The overall response rate was 33% in CMML (50% in HMA-naive CMML and 23% in HMA-failure CMML) and 48% in sAML (82% in HMA-naive sAML and 32% in HMA-failure sAML). The median OS was 14.4, 8.8, 42.9, and 2.9 months for HMA-naive CMML, HMA-failure CMML, HMA-naive sAML, and HMA-failure sAML, respectively. The median LFS was 14.4 and 3.9 months for HMA-naive CMML and HMA-failure CMML, respectively., Conclusions: CLAD/LDAC/HMA-based regimens are effective in a subset of patients with higher risk CMML and sAML arising from CMML who have not previously experienced HMA failure. These findings must be confirmed in prospective studies., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Background: A recent breakthrough therapy combining the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) targeting DNA methyltransferase has improved outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the responses and long-term survival in older/unfit patients and in patients with relapsed/refractory AML remain suboptimal. Recent studies showed that inhibition of BCL-2 or DNA methyltransferase modulates AML T-cell immunity., Methods: By using flow cytometry and time-of-flight mass cytometry, the authors examined the effects of the HMA decitabine combined with the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (DAC/VEN therapy) on leukemia cells and T cells in patients with AML who received DAC/VEN therapy in a clinical trial. The authors investigated the response of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibition in the DAC/VEN-treated samples in vitro and investigated the triple combination of PD-1 inhibition with HMA/venetoclax in the trial patients who had AML., Results: DAC/VEN therapy effectively targeted leukemia cells and upregulated the expression of the immune checkpoint-inhibitory receptor PD-1 in T cells while preserving CD4-positive and CD8-positive memory T cells in a subset of patients with AML who were tested. In vitro PD-1 inhibition potentiated the antileukemia response in DAC/VEN-treated AML samples. The combined use of azacitidine, venetoclax, and nivolumab eliminated circulating blasts and leukemia stem cells/progenitor cells and expanded the percentage of CD8-positive memory T cells in an illustrative patient with relapsed AML who responded to the regimen in an ongoing clinical trial., Conclusions: Immunomodulation by targeting PD-1 enhances the therapeutic effect of combining an HMA and venetoclax in patients with AML., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Background: The global incidence of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been estimated as 0.06 to 0.26/100,000. Since their introduction, hypomethylating agents have played a central role in the treatment of MDS, with heterogeneous real-world outcomes., Materials and Methods: We assessed and synthesized clinical outcomes of azacitidine (AZA) monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with higher-risk MDS. A systematic literature review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies, both prospective and retrospective, reporting complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), time-to-response (TTR), and myelosuppressive adverse events (AEs) for patients treated with AZA monotherapy. Noncomparative meta-analyses were used to summarize effects., Results: The search identified 3250 abstracts, of which 34 publications describing 16 studies (5 RCTs, 3 prospective, and 8 retrospective observational) were included. Across all studies, pooled CR was 16%; PR was 6%; Median OS was 16.4 months; median DOR was 10.1 months; median TTR was 4.6 months. Proportions of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia AEs were 10% and 30%., Conclusions: The effectiveness and efficacy of AZA monotherapy-as measured by CR and median OS-was limited. These findings highlight a significant unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with higher-risk MDS., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common and deadly type of leukemia affecting adults. It is typically managed with rounds of non-targeted chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplants, but this is only possible in patients who can tolerate these harsh treatments and many are elderly and frail. With the identification of novel tumor-specific cell surface receptors, there is great conviction that targeted antibody therapies will soon become available for these patients., Areas Covered: In this review, we describe the current landscape of known target receptors for monospecific and bispecific antibody-based therapeutics for AML. Here, we characterize each of the receptors and targeted antibody-based therapeutics in development, illustrating the rational design behind each therapeutic compound. We then discuss the bispecific antibodies in development and how they improve immune surveillance of AML. For each therapeutic, we also summarize the available pre-clinical and clinical data, including data from discontinued trials., Expert Opinion: One antibody-based therapeutic has already been approved for AML treatment, the CD33-targeting antibody-drug conjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin. Many more are currently in pre-clinical and clinical studies. These antibody-based therapeutics can perform tumor-specific, elaborate cytotoxic functions and there is growing confidence they will soon lead to personalized, safe AML treatment options that induce durable remissions.

TP53-altered myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts and TP53-altered acute myeloid leukemia should be considered under one unifying classification term for their study in clinical trials. Ultimately, such a unification would simplify the screening processes for clinical trials and allow a focus on treating the patient for a genetically defined disorder rather than one based on an arbitrary blast threshold., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: The combination of venetoclax and 5-azacitidine (5-AZA) for older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) improves remission rates and survival compared with 5-AZA alone. We hypothesized that the addition of venetoclax to cladribine (CLAD)/low-dose araC (low-dose cytarabine [LDAC]) alternating with 5-AZA backbone may further improve outcomes for older patients with newly diagnosed AML., Methods: This is a phase II study investigating the combination of venetoclax and CLAD/LDAC alternating with venetoclax and 5-AZA in older (≥ 60 years) or unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML. The primary objective was composite complete response (CR) rate (CR plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery); secondary end points were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), overall response rate, and toxicity., Results: A total of 60 patients were treated; median age was 68 years (range, 57-84 years). By European LeukemiaNet, 23%, 33%, and 43% were favorable, intermediate, and adverse risk, respectively. Fifty-six of 60 evaluable patients responded (composite CR: 93%) and 84% were negative for measurable residual disease. There was one death (2%) within 4 weeks. With a median follow-up of 22.1 months, the median overall survival and DFS have not yet been reached. The most frequent grade 3/4 nonhematologic adverse events were febrile neutropenia (n = 33) and pneumonia (n = 14). One patient developed grade 4 tumor lysis syndrome., Conclusion: Venetoclax and CLAD/LDAC alternating with venetoclax and 5-AZA is an effective regimen among older or unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML. The rates of overall survival and DFS are encouraging. Further study of this non-anthracycline-containing backbone in younger patients, unfit for intensive chemotherapy, as well as comparisons to standard frontline therapies is warranted.

TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) form a distinct group of myeloid disorders with dismal outcomes. TP53-mutated MDS and AML have lower response rates to either induction chemotherapy, hypomethylating agent-based regimens, or venetoclax-based therapies compared with non-TP53-mutated counterparts and a poor median overall survival of 5 to 10 months. Recent advances have identified novel pathogenic mechanisms in TP53-mutated myeloid malignancies, which have the potential to improve treatment strategies in this distinct clinical subgroup. In this review, we discuss recent insights into the biology of TP53-mutated MDS/AML, current treatments, and emerging therapies, including immunotherapeutic and nonimmune-based approaches for this entity., Significance: Emerging data on the impact of cytogenetic aberrations, TP53 allelic burden, immunobiology, and tumor microenvironment of TP53-mutated MDS and AML are further unraveling the complexity of this disease. An improved understanding of the functional consequences of TP53 mutations and immune dysregulation in TP53-mutated AML/MDS coupled with dismal outcomes has resulted in a shift from the use of cytotoxic and hypomethylating agent-based therapies to novel immune and nonimmune strategies for the treatment of this entity. It is hoped that these novel, rationally designed combinations will improve outcomes in this area of significant unmet need., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Abstract: Targeted therapy in oncology brings with it the promise to maximize cancer cell cytotoxicity with minimal off-target effects. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), an important group of such targeted agents, consist of a monoclonal antibody conjugated to a potent cytotoxic drug. In the field of leukemia, ADCs form an important component of therapeutic arsenal through the use of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 2 approved agents. A recombinant fusion protein, tagraxofusp, which function similar to ADC, has gained approval for therapy in blastic plasmacytic dendritic cell neoplasm. The use of such agents as monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy has led to improved response rates and outcomes in certain specific disease subtypes and has led to further studies to identify novel cellular targets and improved delivery of cytotoxic agents using ADC. In this review, we will discuss about ADCs in myeloid leukemia and understand their development and current use in the field., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: N.P.: leadership: ASH and ASCO; honoraria: Incyte, Novartis, LFB Biotechnologies, Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, AbbVie, MustangBio, Roche Molecular Diagnostics, Blueprint Medicines, DAVA Pharmaceuticals, Springer, Aptitude Health, NeoPharm, and CareDX; consulting or advisory role: Blueprint Medicines, Pacylex, Immunogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, ClearView Healthcare Partners, Astellas Pharma, Protagonist Therapeutics, Triptych Health Partners, and CTI BioPharma Corp; research funding: Novartis, Stemline Therapeutics, Samus Therapeutics, AbbVie, Cellectis, Affymetrix/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Plexxikon, and MustangBio; travel, accommodations, expenses: Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, AbbVie, DAVA Oncology and MustangBio; uncompensated relationships: Dan's House of Hope and Oncology Times. N.G.D.: consulting or advisory role: Celgene, Agios, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen, Immunogen, Genentech, Servier, Syndax, Trillium Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Arog, and Shattuck Labs; research funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Immunogen, Genentech, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Sevier, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Amgen, Trillium Therapeutics, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE Therapeutics, Novimmune, and GlycoMimetics. For J.S., none were declared., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), combined with hypomethylating agents, can be used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but this strategy results in a high rate of pneumonitis. The authors sought to determine risk factors for pneumonitis development and whether pneumonitis increased mortality., Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 258 AML patients who received ICI-containing regimens from 2016 to 2018. A multidisciplinary adjudication committee diagnosed pneumonia and pneumonitis by reviewing symptoms, imaging, microbiology, and response to therapies. To measure risk factors for pneumonitis and mortality, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed. Pneumonia, pneumonitis, and disease progression were modeled as a time-dependent variable and incorporated a standard risk set modifying variables into the models., Results: Thirty patients developed pneumonitis (12%). Of these, 17 had partial or complete resolution, whereas 13 patients died from pneumonitis. Increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.08), and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.13-5.55). Female sex (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.70) and increasing platelet count (HR, 0.52 per log-unit increase; 95% CI, 0.30-0.92) decreased pneumonitis risk. In adjusted models, ICI-related pneumonitis significantly increased mortality (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.84-4.37)., Conclusions: ICI-related pneumonitis occurs at a high rate in AML patients and increases mortality., Lay Summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remove inhibitory signals that reduce T-cell function and allow T-cells to better attack cancer cells. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the effectiveness of ICIs is limited in part by inflammation of the lung, called pneumonitis. This study reviewed 258 patients with AML who received ICIs and identified 30 patients who developed pneumonitis, nearly half of whom died. Older age and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk, whereas female sex and higher baseline platelet counts decreased pneumonitis risk. Pneumonitis increased mortality by nearly 3-fold. This work highlights the significant harm imposed by pneumonitis after ICI therapies., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Pure erythroid leukemia (PEL) is a rare acute leukemia with a dismal prognosis. TP53 mutations are a dominant feature of PEL, but the characteristics of TP53 alterations in PEL without prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy (d-PEL) or with such exposure (t-PEL) is unknown. We studied 25 patients with TP53-mutated PEL including 16 d-PEL and 9 t-PEL. Both groups had comparable clinical findings and overall survival. The TP53 mutation, commonly missense, was present in the dominant clone in all cases. In the d-PEL group, 10/16 (62.5%) had one TP53 mutation compared to 8/9 (89%) patients in the t-PEL group. In the d-PEL group, 9/16 (56.2%) patients had hotspot mutations compared to 2 (22.2%) patients in the t-PEL group. Notably, monosomy 17 or del(17p) were less common in the d-PEL group (26.6%) compared to the t-PEL group (71.4%), underscoring distinctive TP53 alterations in d-PEL versus t-PEL, possibly reflecting different fitness advantages., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The management of myelofibrosis (MF) has changed over the last several years and could have an impact on patient outcome. This study evaluates the survival of patients with MF at the authors' institution to determine whether it changed in the last decade., Methods: This retrospective study consists of 844 patients (64% male; median age, 66 years; range, 20-90 years) who were examined between 2000 and 2020 with a new diagnosis of MF. Only patients with available marrow biopsy who had reticulin fibrosis of grade 2 or higher were included. Patients were compared by year of presentation: 2000-2010 (n = 373) and 2011-2020 (n = 471)., Results: A statistically significant improvement in median survival in the last decade was noted: from 48 months (95% CI, 42-54 months) to 63 months (95% CI, 55-71 months) (P < .001; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.64-0.95]). Improved survival was observed also in patients 65 years old or older and those having intermediate 2 or high-risk Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) or DIPSS-Plus risk scores. Among 532 patients treated with MF-directed therapy, patients exposed to JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib had superior outcomes with median overall survival of 84 months (95% CI, 70-94 months)., Conclusions: The results demonstrate that survival of patients with MF has improved in the last decade. This improvement is likely due to increased disease awareness, advances in supportive care, and the development of effective treatments., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)