Search

Background: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons commissioned the multidisciplinary Performance Measure Development Work Group on Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing skin cancer reconstruction. Included stakeholders were the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Academy of Dermatology, the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery, the American College of Mohs Surgery, the American Society for Mohs Surgery, and a patient representative., Methods: Two outcome measures and five process measures were identified. The outcome measures included the following: (1) patient satisfaction with information provided by their surgeon before their facial procedure, and (2) postprocedural urgent care or emergency room use. The process measures focus on antibiotic stewardship, anticoagulation continuation and/or coordination of care, opioid avoidance, and verification of clear margins., Results: All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the stakeholder societies., Conclusion: The work group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Continuous Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

The first annual Association of Professors of Dermatology (APD) program director (PD) survey was distributed in November 2022 and included 53 respondents from individual Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) programs. This survey included 137 in-depth questions to identify similarities and differences among programs regarding 12 broad categories: program characteristics; PD demographics; impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on residency training; available resources; quality improvement; clinical instruction; didactic instruction; research content; diversity, equity, and inclusion; wellness; evaluation systems; and graduation outcomes of postgraduate year (PGY) 4 residents. The survey provided preliminary insight to similarities and differences between programs, such as varying academic time and research resources, while also challenging norms seen in areas of diversity, equity, and inclusion. As future surveys are optimized to obtain greater response rates, these metrics can be captured in a centralized database accessible to PDs to reflect trends and identify strengths and weaknesses of dermatology residency programs.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory skin disease that is often recalcitrant to multiple treatments. In determining biologic candidacy for patients with HS, we propose a paradigm shift away from Hurley staging and towards consideration of other variables. Biologics represent a long-term treatment option for HS that may serve as a disease-modifying agent. These medications are typically initiated in patients with moderate to severe disease, which, based on inclusion criteria in clinical trials, is often defined as Hurley stage II or III disease, at which point irreversible tissue damage has already occurred. In real-world clinical settings, these considerations include treatments tried and failed, predicted disease trajectory, disease characteristics beyond lesion type, impact of disease on patients' functional status and quality of life, and patient comorbidities, venturing away from the limitations of Hurley stage designations. Future clinical trials may benefit from inclusion of recalcitrant Hurley stage I patients, which may then re-shape treatment guidelines and insurance coverage and improve patient access to biologic treatments., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with comorbidities that contribute to poor health, impaired life quality, and mortality risk., Objective: To provide evidence-based screening recommendations for comorbidities linked to HS., Methods: Systematic reviews were performed to summarize evidence on the prevalence and incidence of 30 comorbidities in patients with HS relative to the general population. The screening recommendation for each comorbidity was informed by the consistency and quality of existing studies, disease prevalence, and magnitude of association, as well as benefits, harms, and feasibility of screening. The level of evidence and strength of corresponding screening recommendation were graded by using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) criteria., Results: Screening is recommended for the following comorbidities: acne, dissecting cellulitis of the scalp, pilonidal disease, pyoderma gangrenosum, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, suicide, smoking, substance use disorder, polycystic ovary syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, spondyloarthritis, and sexual dysfunction. It is also recommended to screen patients with Down syndrome for HS. The decision to screen for specific comorbidities may vary with patient risk factors. The role of the dermatologist in screening varies according to comorbidity., Limitations: Screening recommendations represent one component of a comprehensive care strategy., Conclusions: Dermatologists should support screening efforts to identify comorbid conditions in HS., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Garg has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viela Bio; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viela Bio; and has received grants: from AbbVie and the National Psoriasis Foundation. Dr Alavi has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Actelion, Celgene, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Kymera, Eli Lily, InflaRx, Sanofi, and Bausch; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Actelion, Celgene, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Genzyme, Kymera, Eli Lily, Sanofi, and Bausch; has received grants from AbbVie; and has received donations of medical equipment from Galderma and Swift. Dr Alhusayen has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Hidramed Solutions and has received honoraria from AbbVie, and Eli Lilly. Dr Daveluy has served as a consultant for AbbVie; has received honoraria from AbbVie; has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie; and has received grants from AbbVie, InflaRx, Regeneron, and Pfizer. Dr Delorme has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Avene, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB Pharma; has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Bausch Health, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi Genzyme; and has received grants from AbbVie, InflaRx, Regeneron, and Pfizer. Dr Gulliver has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Bausch Health, Celgene, Cipher, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, and Valeant; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Bausch Health, Celgene, Cipher, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, UCB, and Valeant; and has received grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr Hamzavi has served as a consultant for Incyte, UCB, and Pfizer and has received grants from Lenicura and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Jaleel has served as a consultant for Eli Lilly and ChemoCentryx/IQVIA and has received grants from the Dermatology Foundation and Skin of Color Society. Dr Kimball has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Kymera; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Kymera; and has received royalties from Pfizer, Trifecta, and UCB. Dr Kirby has served as a consultant for AbbVie, ChemoCentryx, Incyte, Novartis, and UCB; has received honoraria from AbbVie, Incyte, and Viela Bio; and has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie. Dr Kirchhof has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Sanofi-Genzyme; has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Sanofi-Genzyme; and has received grants from the Canadian Dermatology Foundation. Dr Lev-Tov has served as a consultant for Pfizer, Mölnlycke, and NextScience; has received honoraria from Essity; has received grants from NextScience and Essity; and has received donations of medical equipment from Essity, Mölnlycke, and NextScience. Dr Lowes has served as a consultant for AbbVie, Janssen, Viela Bio, Almirall, BSN, Incyte, Janssen, Kymera, and XBiotech. Dr Naik has served as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and 23andme and has received grants from AbbVie, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation. Dr Orenstein has received a Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Danby Research Grant. Dr Piguet has served as a consultant for Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen, UCB, Novartis, Almirall, and Celgene; has received honoraria from Kyowa Kirin Co Ltd, AbbVie, and Novartis; has received grants from AbbVie, Bausch Health, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lilly, NAOS, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, and Sanofi; and has received a donation of medical equipment from La Roche-Posay. Dr Sayed has served as a consultant for UCB, InflaRx, and AbbVie; has received honoraria from UCB and AbbVie; and has served on the speakers bureau for AbbVie and Novartis. Dr Tan has served as a consultant for Almirall, Bausch, Boots/Walgreens, Botanix, Cipher, Galderma, Incyte, L’Oréal, Novartis, Pfizer, Promius, Sun, and UCB; has received honoraria from Almirall, Bausch, Boots/Walgreens, Botanix, Galderma, L’Oréal, Novartis, Pfizer, Promius, and Sun; has served on the speakers bureau for Galderma and L’Oréal; and has received grants from Incyte and UCB. Drs Alikhan and Goldfarb, Author Lester, Drs Malviya and Micheletti, and Authors Strunk and Wright have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with delusional infestation frequently bring specimens and examining these specimens is important in establishing a therapeutic relationship. The minute brown scavenger beetle is a member of the family Latridiidae. It is found in moist environments and feeds on mold. It poses no threat to humans, but it is important that dermatologists recognize it because it may be contained in specimens brought by patients.

A 61 year old immunosuppressed male presented with a non-healing wound following a rose thorn injury. Initial cultures revealed Candida parapsilosis , however histology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in-situ (SCCis). This case emphasizes the importance of biopsy and cultures as fungal infection and SCCis often have similar, non-specific clinical appearances.