Search

BackgroundGranulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and dysregulated myeloid cell responses are implicated in the pathophysiology and severity of COVID-19.MethodsIn this randomised, sequential, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, adults aged 18–79 years (Part 1) or ≥70 years (Part 2) with severe COVID-19, respiratory failure and systemic inflammation (elevated C-reactive protein/ferritin) received a single intravenous infusion of otilimab 90 mg (human anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody) plus standard care (NCT04376684). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28.ResultsIn Part 1 (n=806 randomised 1:1 otilimab:placebo), 71% of otilimab-treated patients were alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28versus67% who received placebo; the model-adjusted difference of 5.3% was not statistically significant (95% CI −0.8–11.4%, p=0.09). A nominally significant model-adjusted difference of 19.1% (95% CI 5.2–33.1%, p=0.009) was observed in the predefined 70–79 years subgroup, but this was not confirmed in Part 2 (n=350 randomised) where the model-adjusted difference was 0.9% (95% CI −9.3–11.2%, p=0.86). Compared with placebo, otilimab resulted in lower serum concentrations of key inflammatory markers, including the putative pharmacodynamic biomarker CC chemokine ligand 17, indicative of GM-CSF pathway blockade. Adverse events were comparable between groups and consistent with severe COVID-19.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28. However, despite the lack of clinical benefit, a reduction in inflammatory markers was observed with otilimab, in addition to an acceptable safety profile.

Background Sotrovimab (VIR-7831) is an engineered human monoclonal antibody targeting a conserved region of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein; it has been shown to have a favorable safety profile and be effective for early treatment of high-risk COVID-19 patients. The COMET-TAIL phase 3 study evaluated sotrovimab administered intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM) for the treatment of participants with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk of disease progression. Methods Between June to August 2021, 973 participants were randomized and received sotrovimab by 500 mg IV infusion or by 500 or 250 mg IM injection. Deep sequencing of the spike gene was performed on nasopharyngeal samples. Baseline (BL; Day 1 or Day 3), post-BL (Day 5 or later), treatment-emergent (TE) substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions, and presence of variants of concern/interest (VOC/VOI), were evaluated at a ≥5% allelic frequency. Phenotypic analyses were conducted using a pseudotyped virus assay. Results Sequences were available from 764 participants (500 mg IV: 314/393; 500 mg IM: 302/387; 250 mg IM: 148/193). Consistent with VOC circulation during enrollment, the Delta variant was detected in 88.2% (674/764) of participants. Alpha and Mu variants were also seen at >2% prevalence. Of the 764 participants, 26 met the primary endpoint for clinical progression to hospitalization >24 hours or death due to any cause through day 29 and were infected with Delta (500 mg IV: 4; 500 mg IM: 9; 250 mg IM: 11), Alpha (500 mg IM: 1), or Mu (500 mg IV: 1) variants. Substitutions at sotrovimab epitope positions were similar across arms and were detected in 82/764 (10.7%) participants at any visit (500 mg IV: 42/314; 500 mg IM: 27/302; 250 mg IM: 13/148). Of these, 2 participants experienced clinical progression: 1 participant infected with the Mu variant (500 mg IV) carried the characteristic R346K substitution at BL; 1 participant infected with the Delta variant (500 mg IM) had P337L and E340K substitutions detected at Day 3 and P337L was enriched at Day 8. The predominant TE epitope substitutions included P337L and E340A/K/V, which confer reduced susceptibility to sotrovimab in vitro. Conclusion Overall, TE epitope substitutions were not associated with clinical progression. Funding Vir & GSK (NCT04913675) Disclosures Maria L. Agostini, PhD, Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Employee|Vir Biotechnology, Inc: Stocks/Bonds Gretja Schnell, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Julia di Iulio, PharmD, PhD, MBA, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Anita Kohli, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Adrienne E. Shapiro, MD, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing GlaxoSmithKline third party funding to Vir support Elias H. Sarkis, MD, Abbvie: Grant/Research Support|Abbvie: Speakers Bureau|Eisai: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Third party funding to Vir|Ironshore: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Speakers Bureau|Lilly: Grant/Research Support|Otsuka: Grant/Research Support|Teva: Speakers Bureau|Vir Biotechnology Inc: Support as a trial site paid to my institution and non-financial support for medical writing support Dave Inman, MSc, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Amanda Peppercorn, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Andrew Skingsley, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds Leah A. Gaffney, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Melissa Aldinger, PharmD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Christy M. Hebner, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds Andrea L. Cathcart, PhD, Vir Biotechnology: Employee|Vir Biotechnology: Stocks/Bonds.

Aims/hypothesis Numerous clinical studies have investigated the anti-CD3ɛ monoclonal antibody otelixizumab in individuals with type 1 diabetes, but limited progress has been made in identifying the optimal clinical dose with acceptable tolerability and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between dose–response, safety and tolerability, beta cell function preservation and the immunological effects of otelixizumab in new-onset type 1 diabetes. Methods In this randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, 24 month study, conducted in five centres in Belgium via the Belgian Diabetes Registry, participants (16–27 years old, n = 40). Randomisation to treatment was by a central computer system; only participants and bedside study personnel were blinded to study treatment. The co-primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events, the rate of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) reactivation, and laboratory measures and vital signs. A mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess beta cell function; exploratory biomarkers were used to measure T cell responses. Results Thirty participants were randomised/28 were analysed (placebo, n = 6/5; otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 9/8; otelixizumab 18 mg, n = 8/8; otelixizumab 27 mg, n = 7/7; otelixizumab 36 mg, n = 0). Dosing was stopped at otelixizumab 27 mg as the predefined EBV reactivation stopping criteria were met. Adverse event frequency and severity were dose dependent; all participants on otelixizumab experienced at least one adverse event related to cytokine release syndrome during the dosing period. EBV reactivation (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 2/9; 18 mg, n = 4/8: 27 mg, n = 5/7) and clinical manifestations (otelixizumab 9 mg, n = 0/9; 18 mg, n = 1/8; 27 mg, n = 3/7) were rapid, dose dependent and transient, and were associated with increased productive T cell clonality that diminished over time. Change from baseline mixed-meal tolerance test C-peptide weighted mean AUC0–120 min following otelixizumab 9 mg was above baseline for up to 18 months (difference from placebo 0.39 [95% CI 0.06, 0.72]; p = 0.023); no beta cell function preservation was observed at otelixizumab 18 and 27 mg. Conclusions/interpretation A metabolic response was observed with otelixizumab 9 mg, while doses higher than 18 mg increased the risk of unwanted clinical EBV reactivation. Although otelixizumab can temporarily compromise immunocompetence, allowing EBV to reactivate, the effect is dose dependent and transient, as evidenced by a rapid emergence of EBV-specific T cells preceding long-term control over EBV reactivation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02000817. Funding The study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

FAUST 3 is an Expert System for diagnosing faults occurring in an electricity supply network. Its task is to diagnose, in real-time, faults which happen on a large and highly interconnected network comprising items of equipment of several types. A complex representation of the network as a collection of `objects' is the means by which diagnosis is made possible. The system performs its diagnosis by means of a `constrained generate and test' approach. Hypotheses are formed, and then examined to find the one most likely to account for the available evidence. The system uses causal reasoning, heuristic knowledge and techniques such as the use of blackboards for communication amongst system modules.