1. In Vitro Fluid Mechanical Effects of Thoracic Artificial Lung Compliance
- Author
-
Ronald B. Hirschl, Robert H. Bartlett, Keith E. Cook, Sean D. Chambers, Darren T. Galligan, and J W McGillicuddy
- Subjects
Materials science ,Polyurethanes ,Biomedical Engineering ,Biophysics ,Pulsatile flow ,Bioengineering ,General Medicine ,In Vitro Techniques ,Pulmonary compliance ,Prosthesis Design ,Artificial lung ,Biomaterials ,Compliance (physiology) ,Respiratory Mechanics ,Humans ,In vitro study ,Prosthesis design ,Artificial Organs ,Power output ,Lung ,Lung Compliance ,Biomedical engineering - Abstract
This in vitro study sought to determine what compliance minimizes thoracic artificial lung impedance and pump power output. A pulsatile pump drove 3.0 cP glycerol through a circuit consisting of an MC3 Biolung preceded by a piston-cylinder (PC, n = 5) chamber with a variable compliance or a polyurethane (n = 4) chamber with a fixed, yet pressure-dependent, compliance. Each chamber was tested at flow rates of 1.8, 3.0, and 5.0 l/min and heart rates of 60, 75, and 100 bpm. Compliances, C, from 0-20 ml/mm Hg were tested in the PC chamber. Instantaneous pump outlet flow and pressure were acquired for determination of device zeroth and first harmonic input impedance, Z(0) and Z(1), and pump steady and pulsatile output powers, P(s) and P(p). PC chamber results indicate that Z(0), Z(1), P(s), and Pp were minimized at C > 1, 5, 0.5, and 4 ml/mm Hg, respectively. This suggests that C should be 1 ml/mm Hg at minimum and ideally 5 ml/mm Hg. The polyurethane chamber was statistically similar to the PC chamber at C = 1 ml/mm Hg when comparing Z(0) and P(s), but was statistically inferior when comparing Z(1) and P(p). The polyurethane compliance chamber, therefore, should be redesigned with greater compliance.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF