Search

Several studies have investigated selection and sequencing of systemic agents to manage recurrent prostate cancer following local definitive treatment.To define the incidence of recurrent prostate cancer in different countries, and systematically review management options and efficacy of first-line systemic therapies for patients with prostate cancer previously treated with definitive radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.We performed a systematic review of studies published from January 2010 to December 2021 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, or ClinicalTrials.gov according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Quality was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. The potential regional burdens of recurrent prostate cancer were estimated by analyzing various regional registry data.A total of 40 studies met the inclusion criteria and an additional landmark study published after the query was included in this review. Patients with metastatic recurrent disease derive benefit from the addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors to androgen deprivation therapy, while docetaxel should be reserved for patients with a high-volume metastatic burden by conventional imaging. Patients with biochemical-only recurrent disease benefit from continuous or intermittent androgen deprivation therapy if they possess high-risk features such as short prostate-specific antigen doubling time or high serum prostate-specific antigen. Current limitations to the published literature include no consideration of contemporary positron emission tomography imaging for evaluating metastatic recurrence or burden and few quality of life assessments.This systematic review summarizes the findings and recommendations for first-line systemic therapy for patients with recurrent prostate cancer following local therapy.We performed a systematic evaluation and summary of all studies published within the past decade on the topic of medications used to treat prostate cancer after it has recurred following radiation therapy or surgery. This review can be used to inform guidelines for prostate cancer management.

Supplementary Figure S1-S2

Supplementary Table S1-S4

Purpose:To study the dynamic changes in plasma Epstein–Barr virus (pEBV) DNA after radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).Experimental Design:We conducted a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with NPC who had detectable pEBV DNA at 6 weeks post-radiotherapy. Randomized patients had a second pEBV DNA checked at 6 months post-randomization. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Results:We prospectively enrolled 789 patients. Baseline post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) patients, and detectable in 216 (27.4%) patients, of whom 104 (13.2%) patients were eligible for randomization to adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 52) versus observation (n = 52). The first post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had a sensitivity of 0.48, specificity of 0.81, area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.65, false positive (FP) rate of 13.8%, and false negative (FN) rate of 14.4% for disease progression. The second post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had improved sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.75, AUC of 0.78, FP rate of 14.3%, and FN rate of 8.1%. Patients with complete clearance of post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (51%) had survival superior to that of patients without post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance (5-year PFS, 85.5% vs. 23.3%; HR, 9.6; P < 0.0001), comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (5-year PFS, 77.1%), irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy or observation.Conclusions:Patients with NPC with detectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA who experienced subsequent pEBV DNA clearance had superior survival comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA. Post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance may serve as an early surrogate endpoint for long-term survival in NPC.

Contains fulltext : 291600.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE: To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical management for which high-level evidence is scant or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers prioritise areas for future research. Diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient and cancer characteristics (disease extent and location, treatment history, comorbidities, and patient preferences) and should incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence, therapeutic guidelines, and logistic and economic factors. Enrolment in clinical trials is always strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2022 once again identified important gaps (areas of nonconsensus) that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference aims to share the knowledge of international experts in prostate cancer with health care providers and patients worldwide. At each APCCC, a panel of physician experts vote in response to multiple-choice questions about their clinical opinions and approaches to managing advanced prostate cancer. This report presents voting results for the subset of questions pertaining to intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, biochemical relapse after definitive treatment, advanced (next-generation) imaging, and management of side effects caused by hormonal therapies. The results provide a practical guide to help clinicians and patients discuss treatment options as part of shared multidisciplinary decision-making. The findings may be especially useful when there is little or no high-level evidence to guide treatment decisions.

BACKGROUND: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have the potential to automatically delineate primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but currently, the literature lacks a module to introduce valuable pre-computed features into a CNN. In addition, most CNNs for primary NPC delineation have focused on contrast-enhanced MRI. To enable the use of CNNs in clinical applications where it would be desirable to avoid contrast agents, such as cancer screening or intra-treatment monitoring, we aim to develop a CNN algorithm with a positional-textural fully-connected attention (FCA) module that can automatically delineate primary NPCs on contrast-free MRI. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed in 404 patients with NPC who had undergone staging MRI. A proposed CNN algorithm incorporated with our positional-textural FCA module (A(proposed)) was trained on manually delineated tumours (M(1st)) to automatically delineate primary NPCs on non-contrast-enhanced T2-weighted fat-suppressed (NE-T2W-FS) images. The performance of A(proposed), three well-established CNNs, Unet (A(unet)), Attention-Unet (A(att)) and Dense-Unet (A(dense)), and a second manual delineation repeated to evaluate human variability (M(2)(nd)) were measured by comparing to the reference standard M(1)(st) to obtain the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). The Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare the performance of A(proposed) against A(unet), A(att), A(dense) and M(2)(nd). RESULTS: A(proposed) showed a median DSC of 0.79 (0.10) and ASD of 0.66 (0.84) mm. It performed better than the well-established networks A(unet) [DSC =0.75 (0.12) and ASD =1.22 (1.73) mm], A(att) [DSC =0.75 (0.10) and ASD =0.96 (1.16) mm] and A(dense) [DSC =0.71 (0.14) and ASD =1.67 (1.92) mm] (all P

Purpose: To study the dynamic changes in plasma Epstein–Barr virus (pEBV) DNA after radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Experimental Design: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with NPC who had detectable pEBV DNA at 6 weeks post-radiotherapy. Randomized patients had a second pEBV DNA checked at 6 months post-randomization. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: We prospectively enrolled 789 patients. Baseline post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) patients, and detectable in 216 (27.4%) patients, of whom 104 (13.2%) patients were eligible for randomization to adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 52) versus observation (n = 52). The first post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had a sensitivity of 0.48, specificity of 0.81, area under receiver-operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.65, false positive (FP) rate of 13.8%, and false negative (FN) rate of 14.4% for disease progression. The second post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA had improved sensitivity of 0.81, specificity of 0.75, AUC of 0.78, FP rate of 14.3%, and FN rate of 8.1%. Patients with complete clearance of post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (51%) had survival superior to that of patients without post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance (5-year PFS, 85.5% vs. 23.3%; HR, 9.6; P < 0.0001), comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA (5-year PFS, 77.1%), irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Conclusions: Patients with NPC with detectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA who experienced subsequent pEBV DNA clearance had superior survival comparable with patients with initially undetectable post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA. Post-radiotherapy pEBV DNA clearance may serve as an early surrogate endpoint for long-term survival in NPC.

Background The durability of improved xerostomia with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with early stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is uncertain. We conducted a long-term prospective assessment of participants treated with IMRT or two-dimensional radiotherapy (2DRT) in a prior randomized study. Methods Parent study participants (IMRT, n = 28; 2DRT, n = 28) who were free of second malignancy or recurrence were eligible. Long-term radiotherapy-related toxicities were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. Long-term patient-reported outcomes were assessed by the six-item xerostomia (XQ) and two European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-HN 2DRT, n = 11) patients gave consent and were assessed for an overall median follow-up of 15.5 years. There was significantly less RTOG ≥grade 2 xerostomia with IMRT versus 2DRT (20% vs. 90%; p = 0.001), but no significant difference in XQ scores. Patients in the IMRT arm reported lower mean scores for the "dry mouth" domain of EORTC QLQ-H&N35 (p = 0.02) and showed trends toward better 15-year OS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.06), LRFS (70.6% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.38), and DRFS (81.5% vs. 53.8%, p = 0.07). SLCs were more frequent in the 2DRT arm. Conclusions The parotid-sparing effect of IMRT in NPC treatment is durable, with significantly less physician- and patient-scored xerostomia at 15 years. IMRT results in better long-term survival and fewer SLCs.

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for delineating cancers on contrast-enhanced MRI (ce-MRI) but there are clinical scenarios in which administration of contrast is not desirable. We investigated performance of the CNN for delineating primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on non-contrast-enhanced images and compared the performance to that on ce-MRI. We retrospectively analyzed primary NPC in 195 patients using a well-established CNN, U-Net, for tumor delineation on the non-contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed (fs)-T2W, ce-T1W and ce-fs-T1W images. The CNN-derived delineations were compared to manual delineations to obtain Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). The DSC and ASD on fs-T2W were compared to those on ce-MRI. Primary tumor volumes (PTVs) of CNN-derived delineations were compared to that of manual delineations. The CNN for NPC delineation on fs-T2W images showed similar DSC (0.71 ± 0.09) and ASD (0.21 ± 0.48 cm) to those on ce-T1W images (0.71 ± 0.09 and 0.17 ± 0.19 cm, respectively) (p > 0.05), and lower DSC but similar ASD to ce-fs-T1W images (0.73 ± 0.09, p 0.05). The CNN overestimated PTVs on all sequences (p

A convolutional neural network (CNN) was adapted to automatically detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and discriminate it from benign hyperplasia on a non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequence for potential use in NPC screening programs. We retrospectively analyzed 412 patients who underwent T2-weighted MRI, 203 of whom had biopsy-proven primary NPC confined to the nasopharynx (stage T1) and 209 had benign hyperplasia without NPC. Thirteen patients were sampled randomly to monitor the training process. We applied the Residual Attention Network architecture, adapted for three-dimensional MR images, and incorporated a slice-attention mechanism, to produce a CNN score of 0–1 for NPC probability. Threefold cross-validation was performed in 399 patients. CNN scores between the NPC and benign hyperplasia groups were compared using Student's t test. Receiver operating characteristic with the area under the curve (AUC) was performed to identify the optimal CNN score threshold. In each fold, significant differences were observed in the CNN scores between the NPC and benign hyperplasia groups (p 0.71, producing a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 92.4%, 90.6%, and 91.5%, respectively, for NPC detection. Our CNN method applied to T2-weighted MRI could discriminate between malignant and benign tissues in the nasopharynx, suggesting that it as a promising approach for the automated detection of early-stage NPC. • The convolutional neural network (CNN)–based algorithm could automatically discriminate between malignant and benign diseases using T2-weighted fat-suppressed MR images. • The CNN-based algorithm had an accuracy of 91.5% with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.96 for discriminating early-stage T1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma from benign hyperplasia. • The CNN-based algorithm had a sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 90.6% for detecting early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

To investigate the value of pre-treatment amide proton transfer–weighted (APTw) imaging for predicting survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Pre-treatment APTw imaging was performed in 77 NPC patients and the mean, 90th percentile, skewness, and kurtosis of APT asymmetry (APTmean, APT90, APTskewness, and APTkurtosis, respectively) were obtained from the primary tumor. Associations of APTw parameters with locoregional relapse–free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis–free survival (DMFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) after 2 years were assessed by univariable Cox regression analysis and significant APTw parameters, together with age, sex, treatment, and stage as confounding variables, were added to the multivariable model. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of patients with high or low APT values based on a threshold value from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Locoregional relapse, distant metastases, and disease relapse occurred in 14/77 (18%), 10/77 (13%), and 20/77 (26%) patients, respectively, at a median follow-up of 48.3 (10.6–67.4) months. Univariable analysis showed significant associations of LRRFS with APTskewness (HR = 1.98; p = 0.034), DMFS with APTmean (HR = 2.44; p = 0.033), and APT90 (HR = 1.93; p = 0.009), and DFS with APTmean (HR = 2.01; p = 0.016), APT90 (HR = 1.68; p = 0.009), and APTskewness (HR = 1.85; p = 0.029). In multivariable analysis, the significant predictors for DMFS were APT90 (HR = 3.51; p = 0.004) and nodal stage (HR = 5.95; p = 0.034) and for DFS were APT90 (HR = 1.97; p = 0.010) and age (HR = 0.92; p = 0.014). An APT90 ≥ 4.38% was associated with a significantly poorer DFS at 2 years than APT90 < 4.38% (66% vs. 91%; HR = 4.01; p = 0.005). APTw imaging may potentially predict survival in patients with NPC. • APTw imaging may provide new markers to predict survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. • APT90 is an independent predictor of distant metastases–free survival and disease-free survival. • The APThigh group is at higher risk of disease relapse than the APTlow group.

Background: Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: To present the results from the APCCC 2019. Design, setting, and participants: Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naive prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials. Patient summary: The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

To assess the image quality and delineation value of compressed sensing (CS)-accelerated 3D T2W turbo-spin-echo (TSE) sequence for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of prostate cancer.An optimized CS-accelerated 3D-T2W-TSE was determined by volunteer imaging and applied for clinical RTP-MRI. This optimized CS-accelerated planning MRI and the standardized adaptive MRI acquired at 1.5T were retrospectively analyzed in 26 prostate cancer patients who were to receive MR-guided radiotherapy. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and relative contrast ratio (CR) were quantitatively assessed. Image quality and artifacts were qualitatively assessed using a five-point scale rating. Delineation value in the prostate and organs-at-risk (OARs) was also rated and compared. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for SNR, relative CR, and rating comparisons. The interobserver rating agreement was evaluated by percent agreement.Significantly better SNR and relative CR in the prostate, rectum, bowel, penis, and penile bulb, while significantly worse in the cauda equina, were observed on the planning MRI. Significantly better ratings of image quality and artifacts were given to the planning MRI, with much less Gibbs ringing and reconstruction artifacts. Significantly better delineation value rating was achieved on the planning MRI in the prostate, seminal vesicle, rectum, penis, penile bulb, and testes, while significantly worse in the cauda equina. A strong to almost perfect interobserver rating agreement was obtained.This study suggested that CS acceleration is applicable and valuable in prostate RTP-MRI. CS-accelerated 3D-T2W-TSE images should benefit the delineation of prostate and many OARs.

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert's treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. Patient summary: In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients., NA

Background: innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: to present the voting results from APCCC 2021. Design, setting, and participants: the experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: the voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: these voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Enrolment in clinical trials should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2021 once again identified salient questions that merit evaluation in specifically designed trials. Patient summary: the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference is a forum for discussing current diagnosis and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. An expert panel votes on predefined questions focused on the most clinically relevant areas for treatment of advanced prostate cancer for which there are gaps in knowledge. The voting results provide a practical guide to help clinicians in discussing treatment options with patients as part of shared decision-making., National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship; Prostate Cancer Foundation; Peter MacCallum Foundation; NHMRC Investigator Grant

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert’s treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. Patient summary In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients.

Purpose This work was to establish an uncomplicated tumor control probability (UTCP) model using hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) clinical data in our institution. The model was then used to analyze the current dose prescription method and to seek the opportunity for improvement. Methods and Materials A tumor control probability (TCP) model was generated based on local clinical data using the maximum likelihood method. A UTCP model was then formed by combining the established TCP model with the normal tissue complication probability model based on the study by Dawson et al. The authors investigated the dependence of maximum achievable UTCP on planning target volume equivalent uniform dose (EUD) at various ratio between planning target volume EUD and normal liver EUD (T/N EUD ratios). A new term uncomplicated tumor control efficiency (UTCE) was also introduced to analyze the outcome. A UTCE value of 1 implied that the theoretical maximum UTCP for the corresponding T/N EUD ratio was achieved. Results The UTCE of the HCC SBRT patients based on the current dose prescription method was found to be 0.93 ± 0.05. It was found that the UTCE could be increased to 0.99 ± 0.03 by using a new dose prescription scheme, for which the UTCP could be maximized while keeping the normal tissue complication probability value smaller than 5%. Conclusions The dose prescription method of the current HCC SBRT in our institution was analyzed using a UTCP model established based on local clinical data. It was shown that there could be a potential to increase the prescription dose of HCC SBRT. A new dose prescription scheme was proposed to achieve better UTCP. Additional clinical trials would be required to validate the proposed dose prescription scheme in the future.

Magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy is reported for treating patients with an insertable cardiac monitor and implantable cardiac pacemakers. All treatments were delivered using a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Among the 4 patients, 2 were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy at a dose of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. A clinical safety protocol was developed to address the decision-making and patient selection, as well as the clarified responsibilities of different parties for management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Dose estimation based on out-of-field dose data are necessary for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices located outside the treatment fields.

AIM The optimal local disease assessment after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of post-IMRT endoscopies. METHODS The medical record of NPC patients with IMRT treatments during 2013 to 2015 was reviewed. Endoscopies and nasopharyngeal biopsies were performed at 6 weeks post-IMRT. Second biopsies were performed 4 weeks later for patients with abnormal first biopsies. Results of endoscopic assessments were correlated with histology using standard descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 262 patients were reviewed. Endoscopy showed a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 71%, 90%, 41% and 97%, respectively. Disease remission at 6 weeks was observed in 234 patients (89.3%). Sixteen patients (6.1%) had ultimate disease remission (late responders) and 12 (4.6%) had persistent local disease. CONCLUSION Endoscopy had high specificity and NPV; therefore, invasive biopsy could be exempted in case of normal endoscopy.

Extranodal extension (ENE) is a criterion for advanced nodal staging of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Our aim was to determine if ENE should be a staging criterion for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MRI of 546 NPC patients were reviewed retrospectively and in 404/546 (74.0%) with metastatic nodes, the nodes were assessed for ENE (grade 0 = absent; grade 1 = infiltration of surrounding fat; grade 2 = infiltration of muscle/skin), size (total volume), site (unilateral/bilateral and upper/lower neck) and necrosis. Associations between nodal features and regional relapse free survival (RRFS), distant metastases free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using cox regression. Differences of survival rates were compared using log-rank test. A p-value of 0.05 indicates statistical significance.ENE grade was the only determinant of RRFS (p = 0.014) and only independent determinant of DMFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p 0.001). Grade 2 ENE was associated with significantly poorer RRFS, DMFS and OS compared to grade 0 and 1 (p 0.05). Addition of grade 2 ENE to N1 and N2 disease showed similar poor RRFS, DMFS and OS to N3 disease (p 0.05). Compared to the current stage N3 disease, inclusion of grade 2 ENE increased the number of N3 patients from 53/546 (9.7%) to 82/546 (15.0%) with similar hazard ratios for DMFS (6.855 and 7.125, respectively) and OS (3.614 and 4.085, respectively).Grade 2 ENE (into muscle and/or skin and/or salivary glands) is an independent indicator of poor outcome and may be considered as a new criterion for N3 nodal disease in NPC.

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show potential for delineating cancers on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, there is world-wide interest in reducing the administration of MRI contrast agents. We aim to determine if CNNs can automatically delineate primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using the non contrast-enhanced (NE) T2-weighted fat-suppressed T1-weighted (CE-T1W) sequence. We retrospectively analyzed primary tumors in 201 patients with NPC. Six patients were randomly sampled as the training-validation group to avoid over-fitting, and the remaining 195 patients underwent validation analysis. We trained and tested a well-established two-dimensional CNN, U-Net, for tumor delineation on CE-T1W and T2W-FS sequences. CNN-derived delineations on CE-T1W and T2W-FS were compared with manual delineation using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and average surface distance (ASD). Differences in DSC and ASD of CNN-derived delineations between CE-T1W and T2W-FS sequences were compared using the Wilcoxon rank test. CNN-derived primary tumor volumes (PTVs) on CE-T1W and T2W-FS were also compared with manual delineation using the Wilcoxon rank test. The CNN’s tumor delineation performance on CE-T1W and T2W-FS showed no differences in DSC (0.71±0.09 vs. 0.71±0.09, p=0.50) and ASD (0.21±0.48cm vs. 0.17±0.19cm, p=0.34). The CNN-derived PTVs were larger than those from manual delineation on both CE-T1W (26.3±25.5cm3 vs. 23.5±26.6cm3, p3 vs. 23.2 ± 26.2 cm3, p

Anatomical imaging criteria for the diagnosis of malignant head and neck nodes may not always be reliable. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of conventional diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) DWI in discriminating benign and malignant metastatic retropharyngeal nodes (RPNs). IVIM DWI using 14 b-values was performed on RPNs of 30 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and 30 patients with elevated plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA without NPC who were part of an EBV-based NPC screening program. Histogram measurements of the two groups were compared for pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion volume fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using the Mann-Whitney U test. Area under the curves (AUCs) of significant measurements were calculated from receiver-operating characteristics analysis and compared using the DeLong test. Compared with metastatic RPNs, benign RPNs had lower ADCmean (0.73 vs 0.82 × 10−3 mm2/s) and Dmean (0.60 vs 0.71 × 10−3 mm2/s) and a higher D*mean (35.21 vs 28.66 × 10−3 mm2/s) (all p

Purpose To evaluate whether pre-treatment intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) can predict treatment outcome after 2 years in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Method One hundred and sixty-one patients with newly diagnosed NPC underwent pre-treatment IVIM-DWI. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation of the mean values of the pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction and apparent diffusion coefficient with local relapse-free survival (LRFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Significant diffusion parameters, together with staging, age, gender and treatment as confounding factors, were added into a multivariate model. The area under the curves (AUCs) of significant parameters for disease relapse were compared using the Delong test. Results Disease relapse occurred in 30 % of the patients at a median follow-up time of 52.1 months. The multivariate analysis showed that high D and T-staging were correlated with poor LRFS (p = 0.042 and 0.020, respectively) and poor DFS (p = 0.023 and 0.001, respectively); low D* and high T-staging with poor RRFS (p = 0.020 and 0.033, respectively); and high N-staging with poor DMFS (p = 0.006). D with the optimal threshold of ≥0.68 × 10−3 mm2/s and T-staging showed similar AUCs (AUC = 0.614 and 0.651, respectively; p = 0.493) for predicting disease relapse. Conclusion High D and low D* were predictors of poor locoregional outcome but none of the diffusion parameters predicted DMFS in NPC.

Background This study aimed to compare the efficacy of abiraterone acetate (AA) versus docetaxel (T) as first-line treatment in chemo-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with or without the ineligible factors of the COU-AA-302 study (presence of visceral metastases, symptomatic disease, and/or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2). Materials and methods The clinical records of chemo-naive mCRPC patients who received AA in six public oncology centers or T in two of these centers between 2003 and 2014 were reviewed. The survival time was compared among four subgroups of patients: those with ineligible factors administered AA (Group Ineligible–AA) or T (Group Ineligible–T), and those without ineligible factors and administered AA (Group Eligible–AA) or T (Group Eligible–T). Results During the study period, we identified 115 mCRPC patients who received AA or T, among whom 29, 36, 29, and 21 patients were classified as Groups Ineligible–AA, Ineligible–T, Eligible–AA, and Eligible–T, respectively. Both Group Ineligible–AA and Group Eligible–AA had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and similar overall survival (OS) as Group Ineligible–T and Group Eligible–T (Ineligible, PFS: 6.3 vs. 5.9 months, P = 0.0234, OS: 7.8 vs. 15.7 months, P = 0.1601; Eligible, PFS: 9.8 vs. 5.6 months, P = 0.0437, OS: 20.5 vs. 18.2 months, P = 0.7820). Conclusions Compared to T, AA treatment resulted in longer PFS and similar OS in chemo-naive mCRPC patients, irrespective of the presence of ineligible factors, suggesting that the initial treatment by AA may still be beneficial to those with the aforementioned ineligible factors.

Purpose To evaluate treatment outcomes, failure patterns and late toxicities in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in 6 public hospitals in Hong Kong over a 10-year period from 2001 to 2010. Material and methods Eligible patients were identified through the Hong Kong Cancer Registry data base. Clinical information was retrieved and verified by oncologists working in the individual centers. Treatment details, survival outcomes and late toxicities were analyzed. Results A total of 3328 patients were recruited. The median follow-up time was 80.2 months. The 8-year actuarial overall survival (OS), local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), distant failure free survival (DFFS), progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole group was 68.5%, 85.8%, 91.5%, 81.5% and 62.6% respectively. Male gender, older age, advanced T and N stage were adverse prognostic factors for OS, DFFS and PFS, whereas use of chemotherapy in form of concurrent chemo-irradiation (CRT), neoadjuvant + CRT, or CRT + adjuvant chemotherapy were favorable prognostic factors for OS and PFS. The local control was adversely affected by advanced T stage. N stage remained as the single adverse prognostic factor for regional control. Distant metastasis was the commonest site of failure. Conclusion IMRT is an effective treatment for NPC with excellent overall loco-regional control. Distant metastasis is the major site of failure. Concurrent chemotherapy with cisplatin has an established role in NPC patients treated by IMRT.

Purpose To determine if the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck can predict distant metastases (DM) from nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and materials MRI examinations of 763 NPC patients were assessed for primary tumour stage (T), nodal stage (N), primary tumour volume (PTV) and total nodal volume (NV). The association between MRI and clinical parameters were examined in DM+ and DM− patients using logistic regression and for distant metastases free survival (DMFS) using cox regression. Optimum thresholds were assessed by receiver-operating characteristics analysis, and positive predictive value (PPV) and odds ratio (OR) calculated. Results Distant metastases were present in 181/763 NPC patients (23.7%). Higher N stage and NV were the independent predictors of DM (p 3 ) to the N stage improved the PPVs and ORs for DM in stage N1 (from 18.9% to 31.8% and 5.613 to 11.133 respectively) and stage N2 (from 40.4% to 60.8% and 16.189 to 36.979 respectively) but not in stage N3 (68.3% to 68.6% and 51.385 to 52.052 respectively). Conclusion MRI N stage and NV were independent predictors of DM and DMFS. The addition of NV in NPC patients with bulky N1 and N2 disease improved the ability of MRI to predict DM.

Background This study evaluates the contemporary care for patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after failure of the primary course of intensity modulated radiotherapy. Methods Eligible patients were identified through the Hong Kong Cancer Registry database. Patterns of care and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Results Two hundred seventy-two patients with locally recurrent tumors were identified. Of them, 30.9% received surgery, whereas 35.7% received re-irradiation (re-RT). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 30.2%. Old age and advanced rT classification were adverse prognostic factors, whereas surgery (mainly in resectable recurrence) was associated with favorable survival outcome. The 5-year OS rates for patients who received surgery and re-RT were 56.3% and 21.8%, respectively. Conclusions Early detection of resectable recurrence is of paramount importance as surgery for resectable tumors offers the potential to achieve excellent outcomes. Re-RT could be considered in selected patients with unresectable disease and favorable prognostic features.

72 Background: Plenty reports suggest Asian prostate cancer patients are more susceptible to docetaxel-related febrile neutropenia (FN). However, primary GCSF prophylaxis is currently not recommended by international guidelines for patients with mCRPC or mHSPC when docetaxel is administered. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the potential benefit of primary GCSF in preventing the potentially life-threatening FN for Chinese mHSPC and mCRPC treated with docetaxel. Methods: Two cohorts (2003-2012 & 2015-2018) that consisted of Chinese patients with mHSPC and mCRPC who had docetaxel at six public oncology centres in Hong Kong were grouped and analysed. Primary GCSF was defined as its administration within 5 days of beginning docetaxel, and its use was at the discretion of oncologists. The primary outcome was FN within 21 days of first cycle of docetaxel (1st FN). Multivariable regression analysis was used. Results: A total of 377 metastatic prostate cancer (mHSPC, n=100 (26%); mCRPC, n=277 (73%)) patients with docetaxel treatment was identified. Primary GCSF was given in 71 (18%) patients. The baseline characteristics were balanced between groups with and without primary GCSF. FN was happened in 61 patients (16%), with 37 (9%) of them at 1st cycle. Primary GCSF were administered in 2 and 69 patients with and without 1st FN, respectively (5.4% vs 20.3%, p=0.03). Primary GCSF was associated with reduced risk of 1st FN (odds ratio (OR), 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 - 0.96; p=0.04) in overall, and a similar trend was observed in both mHSPC (OR, 0.36; p=0.35) and mCRPC (OR, 0.16, p=0.08) subgroups. Besides, among various clinical parameters, poor performance status (ECOG 2-3) was associated with increased risk of 1st FN (OR, 3.90, 95% CI 1.66 – 9.13, p=0.002). Conclusions: Primary GCSF prophylaxis is suggested for Asian mCRPC and mHSPC patients, particularly those with poor performance status, to alleviate the risk of docetaxel-related febrile neutropenia.

MRI can detect early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the detection is more challenging in early-stage NPCs because they must be distinguished from benign hyperplasia in the nasopharynx. This study aimed to determine whether intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM DWI) MRI could distinguish between these two entities. Thirty-four subjects with early-stage NPC and 30 subjects with benign hyperplasia prospectively underwent IVIM DWI. The mean pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated for all subjects and compared between the 2 groups using Student’s t test. Receiver operating characteristics with the area under the curve (AUC) was used to identify the optimal threshold for all significant parameters, and the corresponding diagnostic performance was calculated. A p value of

To determine if treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) induces early changes in amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to perform a preliminary evaluation of APTw imaging in response assessment. Sixteen patients with NPC planned for treatment with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy underwent APTw imaging of the primary tumour pre-treatment and 2-week intra-treatment. Difference in pre- and intra-treatment APT mean (APTmean) was compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Differences in APTmean and percentage change (%Δ) in APTmean were compared between responders and non-responders based on the outcome at 6 months, using the Mann–Whitney U test. APTmean decreased in 9/16 (56.3%) and increased in 7/16 (43.7%) with no significant difference between the pre- and intra-treatment APT values for the whole group (p > 0.05). NPC showed response in 11/16 (68.8%) and non-response in 5/11 (31.2%). There were significant differences between the %Δ of responders and non-responders for APTmean (p = 0.01). Responders showed %Δ decrease in APTmean of − 23.12% while non-responders showed a %Δ increase in APTmean of + 102.28%. APT value changes can be detected in early intra-treatment. Intra-treatment %Δ APTmean shows potential in predicting short-term outcome.

Purpose The contribution of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) remains controversial. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a potential biomarker of subclinical residual disease in NPC. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, we used plasma EBV DNA to identify patients with NPC at a higher risk of relapse for adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with histologically confirmed NPC of Union for International Cancer Control stage IIB to IVB, adequate organ function, and no locoregional disease or distant metastasis were screened by plasma EBV DNA at 6 to 8 weeks after radiotherapy (RT). Patients with undetectable plasma EBV DNA underwent standard surveillance. Patients with detectable plasma EBV DNA were randomly assigned to either adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine for six cycles (arm 1) or observation (arm 2). Patients were stratified for primary treatment (RT v CRT) and stage (II/III v IV). The primary end point was relapse-free survival (RFS). Results Seven hundred eighty-nine patients underwent EBV DNA screening. Plasma EBV DNA was undetectable in 573 (72.6%) and detectable in 216 (27.4%); 104 (13.2%) with detectable EBV DNA were randomly assigned to arms 1 (n = 52) and 2 (n = 52). After a median follow-up of 6.6 years, no significant difference was found in 5-year RFS rate between arms 1 and 2 (49.3% v 54.7%; P = .75; hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.89). The level of post-RT plasma EBV DNA correlated significantly with the hazards of locoregional failure, distant metastasis, and death. Conclusion In patients with NPC with detectable post-RT plasma EBV DNA, adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine did not improve RFS. Post-RT plasma EBV DNA level should be incorporated as the selection factor in future clinical trials of adjuvant therapy in NPC.

Background There is a lack of real-world data regarding the treatment outcomes of chemohormonal therapy versus hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patients and Methods We conducted a territory-wide, multicenter, age- and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-matched cohort study comparing chemohormonal therapy and hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Patient and disease characteristics were reviewed. The primary outcome was PSA progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included clinical progression-free survival and castration resistance-free survival. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. Results From January 2015 to July 2016, 32 Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were treated with chemohormonal therapy, and they were matched to 32 Chinese men who were treated with hormonal therapy alone. Patient and disease characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The chemohormonal therapy group had a significantly better PSA progression-free survival (P = .001) and castration resistance-free survival (P = .002) than the hormonal therapy group. There was no significant difference in the clinical progression-free survival between the 2 groups. Upon multivariate Cox regression analyses, the use of chemohormonal therapy was significantly associated with a longer time to PSA progression (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.73; P = .008) and a longer time to castration resistance (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.83; P = .015), but was not associated with clinical progression. Conclusions The use of chemohormonal therapy could prevent PSA progression and the development of castration resistance when compared with hormonal therapy alone in Chinese men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostatic cancer.

Purpose To evaluate the utility of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in the characterization of head and neck tumors. Materials and Methods This retrospective study of APT imaging included 117 patients with 70 nasopharyngeal undifferentiated carcinomas (NUCs), 26 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), eight non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs), and 13 benign salivary gland tumors (BSGTs). Normal tissues were examined in 25 patients. The APT means of malignant tumors, normal tissues, and benign tumors were calculated and compared with the Student t test and analysis of variance. The added value of the mean APT to the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating malignant and benign tumors was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic analysis and integrated discrimination index. Results The mean APT of malignant tumors (2.40% ± 0.97 [standard deviation]) was significantly higher than that of brain tissue (1.13% ± 0.43), muscle tissue (0.23% ± 0.73), and benign tumors (1.32% ± 1.20) (P < .001). There were no differences between malignant groups (NUC, 2.37% ± 0.90; SCC, 2.41% ± 1.16; NHL, 2.65% ± 0.89; P = .45 to P = .86). The mean ADC of malignant tumors ([0.85 ± 0.17] × 10-3 mm2/sec) was significantly lower than that of benign tumors ([1.46 ± 0.47] × 10-3 mm2/sec) (P = .001). Adding APT to ADC increased the area under the curve from 0.87 to 0.96, with an integrated discrimination index of 7.6% (P = .13). Conclusion These preliminary data demonstrate differences in amide proton transfer (APT) mean of malignant tumors, normal tissues, and benign tumors, although APT mean could not be used to differentiate between malignant tumor groups. APT imaging has the potential to be of added value to apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating malignant from benign tumors.

Introduction A substantial survival benefit with chemohormonal therapy has been proven by the CHAARTED and STAMPEDE studies, and this clinical approach has emerged as the standard of care for patients with metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, because its clinical efficacy and tolerability in Asian patients remains uncertain, this study aims to evaluate preliminary results of its use in Hong Kong. Methods The clinical records of mHSPC patients treated with chemohormonal therapy from all six public oncology centers in Hong Kong between January 2015 and July 2016 were reviewed. Time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), treatment-related complications, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and the time to PSA nadir were assessed. Results A total of 32 patients (median age, 66 years) were treated with chemohormonal therapy in the review period. After median follow-up time of 11.4 months, the median time to CRPC and time to PSA nadir were 19.5 months and 7 months, respectively. PSA response (>50% drop in PSA level from baseline) was achieved in all patients and the median maximal PSA response was 99.6%. The rates of grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia, neutropenia and anemia were 12.5%, 40.6% and 3.1%, respectively. Conclusion Early efficacy with chemohormonal therapy in Asian mHSPC patients was comparable to the pivotal study and biochemical response is promising. The high frequency of hematologic toxicities in Asian patients highlights the importance of proper patient selection and pre-emptive use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Purpose: With the emergence of various novel therapies including new generation taxane and androgen-targeted therapies, the optimal sequence of systemic treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients remains to be defined. Our aim is to investigate the impact of duration of docetaxel-based chemotherapy and postdocetaxel treatment in mCRPC patients. Methods: The medical data of 57 Chinese mCRPC patients who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy in two oncology centers between 2003 and 2012 were reviewed. The treatment efficacy and toxicity were determined. The potential determinants of efficacy were also determined. Results: Fifty-seven patients (median age 66 years, range 51–82 years) were given docetaxel-based chemotherapy, of whom 48 (84.2%) received 3-weekly docetaxel (52.5–75 mg/m2) and nine (15.8%) received weekly docetaxel (35 mg/m2). Postdocetaxel treatments were received by 31 (57.4%) patients, including abiraterone in 13 patients and cabazitaxel in one patient. The median follow-up time was 14.3 months. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 20.8 months and 5.8 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, eight cycles or more of chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.151, P

To identify primary sites of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) invasion on the staging head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that correlate with distant metastases (DM). Staging head and neck MRI examinations of 579 NPC patients were assessed for primary tumour invasion into 16 individual sites, primary stage (T) and nodal stage (N). Results were correlated with distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) using the Cox regression, and the diagnostic performance of significant independent markers for DM was calculated. In addition, sites of primary tumour invasion were correlated also with involvement of the first echelon of ipsilateral nodes (FEN+) using logistic regression. Distant metastases were present in 128/579 NPC patients (22.1%) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/chemo-IMRT and 5-year DMFS was 78.8%. Prevertebral space invasion (PVS+) and N stage, but not T stage, were independent prognostic markers of DMFS (p = 0.016, < 0.001, and 0.433, respectively). Compared to stage N3, PVS invasion had a higher sensitivity (28.1 vs. 68.8%), but lower specificity (90.5 vs. 47.4%) and accuracy (76.7 vs. 48.9%) for correlating patients with DM. PVS invasion, together with parapharyngeal fat space invasion (PPFS+), was also an independent predictive marker of FEN+. PVS was the only site of primary tumour invasion that independently correlated with DM, and together with PPFS + was an independent prognostic marker of FEN+, but the low specificity and accuracy of PVS invasion limits its use as a prognostic marker of DM.

INTRODUCTION Temozolomide is the first chemotherapeutic agent proven effective for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. The drug is well tolerated for its low toxicity. The current standard practice is concomitant chemoradiotherapy for 6 weeks followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide. Some Caucasian studies have suggested that patients might benefit from extended adjuvant cycles of temozolomide (>6 cycles) to lengthen both progression-free survival and overall survival. In the present study, we compared differences in survival and toxicity profile between patients who received conventional 6-cycle temozolomide and those who received more than 6 cycles of temozolomide. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without progressive disease and completed concomitant chemoradiotherapy during a 4-year period were studied. Progression-free survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. t Test, U test, and correlation were chosen accordingly to examine the impact of age, extent of resection, MGMT promoter methylation status and adjuvant cycles on progression-free survival. For factors with a P value of

INTRODUCTION Surgical resection used to be the mainstay of treatment for glioma. In the last decade, however, opinion has changed about the goal of surgical resection in treating glioma. Ample evidence shows that maximum safe resection in glioblastoma improves survival. Neurosurgeons have therefore revised their objective of surgery from diagnostic biopsy or limited debulking to maximum safe resection. Given these changes in the management of glioma, we compared the survival of local Chinese patients with glioblastoma multiforme over a period of 10 years. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of the brain tumour registry of the CUHK Otto Wong Brain Tumour Centre in Hong Kong. Data of patients with glioblastoma multiforme were reviewed for two periods, during 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005 and 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. Overall survival during these two periods of time was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Risk factors including age, type and extent of resection, use of chemotherapy, and methylation status of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase were also assessed. RESULTS There were 26 patients with glioblastoma multiforme with a mean age of 52.2 years during 2003 to 2005, and 42 patients with a mean age of 55.1 years during 2010 to 2012. The mean overall survival during these two periods was 7.4 months and 12.7 months, respectively (P

27 Background: It remains uncertain whether stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is superior to conventional fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CF-IMRT) in the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. Here we report the 1-year late toxicity results from this randomized phase II study comparing SBRT and CF-IMRT. Methods: The primary endpoint of this single centre randomized phase II study is the health-related quality of life (HRQOL), as measured by the bowel and urinary domains of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) instrument. The secondary endpoints include toxicities, biochemical control and overall survival. We enrolled low and intermediate risk localized prostate cancer patients (T1-T2, Gleason score ≤7 and PSA

Aims To compare the dosimetry and treatment delivery efficiency of RapidArc with conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and methods Fifteen patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer were studied. Sequential treatment was used. The initial planning target volume (PTV-L) included the prostate, seminal vesicles and pelvic lymphatics, whereas the prostate boost PTV (PTV-P) included the prostate and seminal vesicles only. The total prescription dose was 76 Gy (44 Gy to PTV-L, 32 Gy to PTV-P; 2 Gy/fraction). Two separate planning techniques were generated for each patient: seven static-field IMRT versus two-arc RapidArc. Dose–volume parameters for the organs at risk, conformity index and homogeneity index for the PTVs, the calculated monitor units and treatment delivery time for both techniques were compared. Results RapidArc gave more conformal plans than IMRT for both PTVs. RapidArc gave a higher homogeneity index to the PTV-P and a similar homogeneity index to the PTV-L. The two techniques gave similar dosimetric results for the rectum, bladder and femoral heads. The mean dose ( D mean ) and the maximum dose ( D max ) of the bowel space were reduced by 3.06 and 2.83%, respectively, with RapidArc. The V 20 Gy , V 30 Gy and V 40 Gy for healthy tissues were reduced by 7.77, 14.25 and 17.55%, respectively, with RapidArc. The calculated treatment delivery time and monitor units were reduced by 74.09%/60.93% and 68.32%/48.06% for the PTV-L/PTV-P, respectively, with RapidArc. Conclusion RapidArc is better than conventional IMRT in terms of dosimetry and delivery efficiency for high-risk prostate cancer.

Background There is much interest in confirming whether the efficacy of abiraterone acetate (AA) demonstrated within the trial setting is reproducible in routine clinical practice. We report the clinical outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with AA in real-life clinical practice. Methods The clinical records of mCRPC patients treated with AA from all 6 public oncology centers in Hong Kong between August 2011 and December 2014 were reviewed. The treatment efficacy and its determinants, and toxicities were determined. Results A total of 110 patients with mCRPC were treated with AA in the review period, of whom 58 were chemo-naive and 52 had received prior chemotherapy (post-chemo). The median follow-up time was 7.5/11.4 months for chemo-naive/post-chemo patients. 6.9/15.4 % of chemo-naive/post-chemo patients had visceral metastases. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 18.1/15.5 months and 6.7/6.4 months for chemo-naive/post-chemo patients, respectively. Among chemo-naive patients, those with visceral diseases had significantly inferior OS (2.8 vs 18.0 p = 0.0007) and PFS (2.8 vs 6.8 months, p = 0.0088) than those without. Pain control was comparable in both groups of patients. The most common grade 3 or above toxicities were hypertension (6.9/5.8 %) and hypokalemia (3.4/3.8 %) in chemo-naive/post-chemo patients. In multivariate analysis, the presence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50 % drop of PSA from baseline) within the first 3 months of therapy was associated with favorable OS and PFS in both chemo-naive and post-chemo group. Conclusions In clinical practice outside the trial setting, OS after AA in our chemo-naive patient cohort (18.1 months) was considerably shorter than that reported in the COU-AA-302 trial (34.7 months), and the OS was particularly short in those with visceral metastases (2.8 months). Conversely, AA was efficacious in post-chemo patients. AA resulted in comparable pain control in both groups of patients. The presence of PSA response within the first 3 months of treatment was a significant determinant of survival.