Search

Background: Despite outstanding advances in understanding the genetic background of uveal melanoma (UM) development and prognosis, the role of DNA methylation reprogramming remains elusive. This study aims to clarify the extent of DNA methylation deregulation in the context of gene expression changes and its utility as a reliable prognostic biomarker. Methods: Transcriptomic and DNA methylation landscapes in 25 high- and low-risk UMs were interrogated by Agilent SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression 8×60K v2 Microarray and Human Infinium Methylation EPIC Bead Chip array, respectively. DNA methylation and gene expression of the nine top discriminatory genes, selected by the integrative analysis, were validated by pyrosequencing and qPCR in 58 tissues. Results: Among 2,262 differentially expressed genes discovered in UM samples differing in metastatic risk, 60 were epigenetic regulators, mostly histone modifiers and chromatin remodelers. A total of 44,398 CpGs were differentially methylated, 27,810 hypomethylated, and 16,588 hypermethylated in high-risk tumors, with Δβ values ranging between -0.78 and 0.79. By integrative analysis, 944 differentially expressed DNA methylation-regulated genes were revealed, 635 hypomethylated/upregulated, and 309 hypermethylated/downregulated. Aberrant DNA methylation in high-risk tumors was associated with the deregulation of key oncogenic pathways such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, focal adhesion, proteoglycans in cancer, PI3K-Akt signaling, or ECM-receptor interaction. Notably, the DNA methylation values of nine genes, HTR2B, AHNAK2, CALHM2, SLC25A38, EDNRB, TLR1, RNF43, IL12RB2, and MEGF10, validated by pyrosequencing, demonstrated excellent risk group prediction accuracies (AUCs ranging between 0.870 and 0.956). Moreover, CALHM2 hypomethylation and MEGF10, TLR1 hypermethylation, as well as two three-gene methylation signatures, Signature 1 combining AHNAK2, CALHM2, and IL12RB and Signature 2 AHNAK2, CALHM2, and SLC25A38 genes, correlated with shorter overall survival (HR = 4.38, 95% CI 1.30-16.41, HR = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30-16.41; HR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.30-16.41, HR = 4.61, 95% CI 1.30-16.41 and HR = 4.95, 95% CI 1.39-17.58, respectively). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a significant role of DNA methylation aberrancy in UM progression. The advantages of DNA as a biological material and the excellent prediction accuracies of methylation markers open the perspective for their more extensive clinical use.

Background: Despite outstanding advances in understanding the genetic background of uveal melanoma (UM) development and prognosis, the role of DNA methylation reprogramming remains elusive. This study aims to clarify the extent of DNA methylation deregulation in the context of gene expression changes and its utility as a reliable prognostic biomarker. Methods: Transcriptomic and DNA methylation landscapes in 25 high- and low-risk UMs were interrogated by Agilent SurePrint G3 Human Gene Expression 8×60K v2 Microarray and Human Infinium Methylation EPIC Bead Chip array, respectively. DNA methylation and gene expression of the nine top discriminatory genes, selected by the integrative analysis, were validated by pyrosequencing and qPCR in 58 tissues. Results: Among 2,262 differentially expressed genes discovered in UM samples differing in metastatic risk, 60 were epigenetic regulators, mostly histone modifiers and chromatin remodelers. 44,398 CpGs were differentially methylated, 27,810 hypomethylated, and 16,588 hypermethylated in high-risk tumors, with Δβ values ranging between -0.78 and 0.79. By integrative analysis, 944 differentially expressed DNA methylation-regulated genes were revealed, 635 hypomethylated/upregulated, and 309 hypermethylated/downregulated. Aberrant DNA methylation in high-risk tumors was associated with the deregulation of key oncogenic pathways such as EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, focal adhesion, proteoglycans in cancer, PI3K-Akt signaling, or ECM-receptor interaction. Notably, DNA methylation values of nine genes, HTR2B, AHNAK2, CALHM2, SLC25A38, EDNRB, TLR1, RNF43, IL12RB2, and MEGF10, validated by pyrosequencing, demonstrated excellent risk group prediction accuracies (AUC ranging between 0.870 and 0.956). Moreover, CALHM2 hypomethylation and MEGF10, TLR1 hypermethylation, as well as two three-gene methylation signatures, Signature 1 combining AHNAK2, CALHM2, and IL12RB and Signature 2 AHNAK2, CALHM2, and SLC25A38genes, correlated with shorter overall survival (HR = 4.38, 95% CI 1.30-16.41, HR = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30-16.41; HR = 3.43, 95% CI 1.30-16.41, HR = 4.61, 95% CI 1.30-16.41 and HR = 4.95, 95% CI 1.39-17.58, respectively). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a significant role of DNA methylation aberrancy in UM progression. The advantages of DNA as a biological material and excellent prediction accuracies of methylation markers open the perspective for their more extensive clinical use.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is an ocular tumor with a dismal prognosis. Despite the availability of precise molecular and cytogenetic techniques, clinicopathologic features with limited accuracy are widely used to predict metastatic potential. In 51 UM tissues, we assessed a correlation between the expression of nine proteins evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Melan-A, S100, HMB45, Cyclin D1, Ki-67, p53, KIT, BCL2, and AIFM1) and the presence of UM-specific chromosomal rearrangements measured by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), to find IHC markers with increased prognostic information. Furthermore, mRNA expression and DNA methylation values were extracted from the whole-genome data, achieved by analyzing 22 fresh frozen UM tissues. KIT positivity was associated with monosomy 3, increasing the risk of poor prognosis more than 17-fold (95% CI 1.53–198.69, p = 0.021). A strong negative correlation was identified between mRNA expression and DNA methylation values for 12 of 20 analyzed positions, five located in regulatory regions of the KIT gene (r = −0.658, p = 0.001, r = −0.662, p = 0.001, r = −0.816, p &lt, 0.001, r = −0.689, p = 0.001, r = −0.809, p &lt, 0.001, respectively). DNA methylation β values were also inversely associated with KIT protein expression (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.015, p = 0.025, p = 0.002). Our findings, showing epigenetic deregulation of KIT expression, may contribute to understanding the past failure to therapeutically target KIT in UM.

Despite outstanding advances in diagnosis and the treatment of primary uveal melanoma (UM), nearly 50% of UM patients develop metastases via hematogenous dissemination, driven by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Despite the failure in UM to date, a liquid biopsy may offer a feasible non-invasive approach for monitoring metastatic disease progression and addressing protracted dormancy. To detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in UM patients, we evaluated the mRNA expression of EMT-associated transcription factors in CD45-depleted blood fraction, using qRT-PCR. ddPCR was employed to assess UM-specific GNA11, GNAQ, PLCβ4, and CYSLTR2 mutations in plasma DNA. Moreover, microarray analysis was performed on total RNA isolated from tumor tissues to estimate the prognostic value of EMT-associated gene expression. In total, 42 primary UM and 11 metastatic patients were enrolled. All CD45-depleted samples were negative for CTC when compared to the peripheral blood fraction of 60 healthy controls. Tumor-specific mutations were detected in the plasma of 21.4% patients, merely, in 9.4% of primary UM, while 54.5% in metastatic patients. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed EMT genes showed significant differences between monosomy 3 and disomy 3 tumors. Newly identified genes can serve as non-invasive prognostic biomarkers that can support therapeutic decisions.