Search

Introduction Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) is acute inflammatory disease of respiratory system with a high mortality, caused Ьу coronavirus MERS-CoV At present moment, we still lack specific therapeutic preparations and vaccines against MERS Vaccine administration can help to limit the spread of the disease and lower the mortality Duration of vaccine-induced immune response is one of the key characteristics of a vaccine, which is connected with duration of its protective effectiveness Unfortunately, the data on duration of vaccine-induced immune response against MERS is scarce The aim of the study was to determine duration of humoral immune response in mice and primates and duration of protective immune response in mice after immunization with the heterologous virus-vectored vaccine against MERS (BVRS-GamVac-Combi), developed earlier Ьу our research group Material and methods To study duration of humoral immune response, we used mice of C57BL/6 strain and common marmosets Animals were immunized with the vaccine BVRS-GamVac-Combi, based on recomЬinant adenoviral vectors rAd26 and rAd5 Antigen-specific-antibody titers were determined with ELISA, virus-neutralizing antibody titers were measured with virus neutralization assay using MERS-CoV (EMC/2012) To study duration of protective immune response, we used a model of lethal infection on transgenic mice, carrying human DPP4 gene of viral receptor Results In present research, we showed that vaccination of animals with BVRS-GamVac-Combi induced robust humoral immune response, which persisted at least 18 months after immunization In addition, our vaccine protected 100 % of animals from lethal infection for at least 7 months after immunization Concluslon Strength of vaccine-induced immune response is generally connected with a protective effectiveness of a vaccine One of the key problems of vaccine design is to find a way to provide as long and robust immune response as possible Duration of vaccine-induced immune response is one of the key characteristics of a vaccine, which demands quality control during multiple steps of a vaccine development Введение Ближневосточный респираторный синдром (БВРС) - это острое воспалительное заболевание дыхательной системы с высокой летальностью, возбудителем которого является коронавирус БВРС-КоВ В настоящее время в мире не существует специфических профилактических и терапевтических средств против БВРС Вакцино-профилактика позволит ограничить распространение данного заболевания и снизить летальность Одной из ключевых характеристик вакцин является длительность индуцируемого иммунного ответа, от которой зависит продолжительность протективного эффекта вакцины К сожалению, данных по длительности поствакцинального иммунного ответа для вакцин против БВРС сейчас недостаточно Цель исследования - определение длительности гуморального иммунного ответа у грызунов и приматов и протективного иммунного ответа после иммунизации комбинированной векторной вакциной против БВРС (БВРС-ГамВак-Комби), разработанной нами ранее Материал и методы Длительность гуморального иммунитета исследовали на мышах линии C57BL/6 и обыкновенных игрунках Животных иммунизировали вакциной БВРС-ГамВак-Комби на основе рекомбинантных векторов rAd26 и rAd5 Титр антиген-специфических антител определяли методом иммуноферментного анализа (ИФА) Титр вирус-нейтрализующих антител определяли с помощью реакции вирус-нейтрализации против вируса БВРС-КоВ (MERS-CoV EMC/2012) Длительность протективного иммунитета исследовали на модели летальной инфекции у трансгенных мышей, несущих ген человека DPP4, кодирующий рецептор к БВРС-КоВ Результаты Исследование длительности поствакцинального гуморального иммунного ответа у грызунов и приматов показало, что вакцинация животных БВРС-ГамВак-Комби индуцирует формирование напряженного гуморального иммунного ответа к гликопротеину S БВРС-КоВ, который сохраняется на протяжении не менее 18 мес Также было показано, что вакцинация позволяет защитить 100 % животных от летальной инфекции, вызванной БВРС-КоВ (MERS-CoV EMC/2012, 100 ЛД50/мышь), через 7 мес после иммунизации Заключение Напряженность поствакцинального гуморального иммунного ответа, как правило, связана с протективностью вакцины Одной из ключевых задач при дизайне вакцин является обеспечение наиболее длительного напряженного иммунного ответа Длительность поствакцинального иммунного ответа - одна из ключевых характеристик вакцин, которая требует контроля на различных этапах их разработки

ObjectivesVaccination remains the most effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Most vaccines use two-dose regimens. In turn, single-dose vaccines also have high potential, since, on the one hand, they simplify the vaccination program, make it more accessible and convenient for more people around the world, and on the other hand, they are better suited for subsequent revaccination. However, there is not enough data on the effectiveness of single-dose vaccine variants against new genetic lines to assess their current potential. It is not clear how much a single dose of immunization protects against the globally dominant delta variant. In this work, we investigated the effectiveness of a single dose vaccine (Sputnik Light, the first component of Sputnik V vaccine) against the Delta variant in Moscow.MethodsTo assess the effectiveness of one dose of viral vector vaccine based on rAd26 against the delta variant in Moscow, we used data from the Moscow registries of vaccination against COVID-19 and the incidence of COVID-19. The availability of data on the number of seropositive residents of Moscow made it possible to consider the size of the immune layer formed because of a previous COVID-19 disease or vaccination. To calculate the effectiveness, the proportion of COVID-19 cases among those vaccinated with a single dose and the proportion of cases among those who were not vaccinated in July 2021.ResultsOur data indicate that throughout July 2021, the dominant variant of the coronavirus at the level of 99.5% in Moscow was the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant and its subsidiary lines. Considering the immune layer of 46% allowed us to calculate the effectiveness of a one-shot vaccine against the delta variant in Moscow during the first three months after vaccination at the level of 69.85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.08 to 74.70). In the 18-29-year-old group, the overall vaccine efficacy against the delta variant was 88.61%, in the 18-59 group - 75.28%. Sputnik Light demonstrates higher efficacy against Delta variant than many two-shot vaccines.ConclusionThe results indicate a high efficacy of a single immunization first component of Sputnik V vaccine against delta variant among young and middle-aged people, at least during the first 3 months after receiving the one-shot vaccine.

Since the beginning of the 2021 year, all the main six vaccines against COVID-19 have been used in mass vaccination companies around the world. Virus neutralization and epidemiological efficacy drop obtained for several vaccines against the B.1.1.7, B.1.351 P.1, and B.1.617 genotypes are of concern. There is a growing number of reports on mutations in receptor-binding domain (RBD) increasing the transmissibility of the virus and escaping the neutralizing effect of antibodies. The Sputnik V vaccine is currently approved for use in more than 66 countries but its activity against variants of concern (VOC) is not extensively studied yet. Virus-neutralizing activity (VNA) of sera obtained from people vaccinated with Sputnik V in relation to internationally relevant genetic lineages B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 and Moscow endemic variants B.1.1.141 (T385I) and B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with mutations in the RBD domain has been assessed. The data obtained indicate no significant differences in VNA against B.1.1.7, B.1.617.3 and local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 (T385I), B.1.1.317 (S477N, A522S) with RBD mutations. For the B.1.351, P.1, and B.1.617.2 statistically significant 3.1-, 2.8-, and 2.5-fold, respectively, VNA reduction was observed. Notably, this decrease is lower than that reported in publications for other vaccines. However, a direct comparative study is necessary for a conclusion. Thus, sera from “Sputnik V”-vaccinated retain neutralizing activity against VOC B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, B.1.617.2, B.1.617.3 as well as local genetic lineages B.1.1.141 and B.1.1.317 circulating in Moscow.

The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was identified in 2012 during the first Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreaks. MERS-CoV causes an acute lower-respiratory infection in humans, with a fatality rate of ~35.5%. Currently, there are no registered vaccines or means of therapeutic protection against MERS in the world. The MERS-CoV S glycoprotein plays the most important role in the viral life cycle (virus internalization). The S protein is an immunodominant antigen and the main target for neutralizing antibodies. In the present study, the immunogenicities of five different forms of the MERS-CoV S glycoprotein were compared: the full-length S glycoprotein, the full-length S glycoprotein with the transmembrane domain of the G glycoprotein of VSV (S-G), the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the S glycoprotein, the membrane-fused RBD (the RBD fused with the transmembrane domain of the VSV G glycoprotein (RBD-G)), and the RBD fused with Fc of human IgG1 (RBD-Fc). Recombinant vectors based on human adenoviruses type 5 (rAd5) were used as delivery vehicles. Vaccination with all of the developed rAd5 vectors elicited a balanced Th1/Th2 response in mice. The most robust humoral immune response was induced after the animal had been vaccinated with the membrane-fused RBD (rAd5-RBD-G). Only immunization with membrane forms of the glycoprotein (rAd5-S, rAd5-S-G, and rAd5-RBD-G) elicited neutralizing antibodies among all vaccinated animals. The most significant cellular immune response was induced after vaccination of the animals with the full-length S (rAd5-S). These investigations suggest that the full-length S and the membrane form of the RBD (RBD-G) are the most promising vaccine candidates among all the studied forms of S glycoprotein.

Ebola virus disease (EVD) is one of the deadliest viral infections affecting humans and nonhuman primates. Of 6 known representatives of the Ebolavirus genus responsible for the disease, 3 can infect humans, causing acute highly contagious fever characterized by up to 90% fatality. These include Bundibugyo ebolavirus (BDBV), Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) and Sudan ebolavirus (SUDV). The majority of the reported EVD cases are caused by ZEBOV. Vaccine development against the virus started in 1976, immediately after the causative agent of the infection was identified. So far, 4 vaccines have been approved. All of them are based on the protective epitope of the ZEBOV glycoprotein GP. Because SUDV and BDBV can also cause outbreaks and epidemics, it is vital to design a vaccine capable of conferring protection against all known ebolaviruses posing a threat to the human population. This article presents systematized data on the structure, immunogenicity and protective properties of ebolavirus glycoprotein GP, looks closely at the immunodominant epitopes of ZEBOV, SUDV and BDBV glycoprotein GP required to elicit a protective immune response, and offers a rational perspective on the development of a universal vaccine against EVD that relies on the use of vectors expressing two variants of GP represented by ZEBOV and SUDV.

Background A heterologous recombinant adenovirus (rAd)-based vaccine, Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V), showed a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses in participants in phase 1/2 clinical trials. Here, we report preliminary results on the efficacy and safety of Gam-COVID-Vac from the interim analysis of this phase 3 trial. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial at 25 hospitals and polyclinics in Moscow, Russia. We included participants aged at least 18 years, with negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR and IgG and IgM tests, no infectious diseases in the 14 days before enrolment, and no other vaccinations in the 30 days before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (3:1) to receive vaccine or placebo, with stratification by age group. Investigators, participants, and all study staff were masked to group assignment. The vaccine was administered (0·5 mL/dose) intramuscularly in a prime-boost regimen: a 21-day interval between the first dose (rAd26) and the second dose (rAd5), both vectors carrying the gene for the full-length SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein S. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from day 21 after receiving the first dose. All analyses excluded participants with protocol violations: the primary outcome was assessed in participants who had received two doses of vaccine or placebo, serious adverse events were assessed in all participants who had received at least one dose at the time of database lock, and rare adverse events were assessed in all participants who had received two doses and for whom all available data were verified in the case report form at the time of database lock. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04530396). Findings Between Sept 7 and Nov 24, 2020, 21 977 adults were randomly assigned to the vaccine group (n=16 501) or the placebo group (n=5476). 19 866 received two doses of vaccine or placebo and were included in the primary outcome analysis. From 21 days after the first dose of vaccine (the day of dose 2), 16 (0·1%) of 14 964 participants in the vaccine group and 62 (1·3%) of 4902 in the placebo group were confirmed to have COVID-19; vaccine efficacy was 91·6% (95% CI 85·6–95·2). Most reported adverse events were grade 1 (7485 [94·0%] of 7966 total events). 45 (0·3%) of 16 427 participants in the vaccine group and 23 (0·4%) of 5435 participants in the placebo group had serious adverse events; none were considered associated with vaccination, with confirmation from the independent data monitoring committee. Four deaths were reported during the study (three [

Background: While the world is experiencing another wave of COVID-19 pandemic, global vaccination program is hampered by obvious shortage in supply of licensed vaccines. Development of new vaccines that are easy to manufacture and administer is highly desirable to overcome hurdles in vaccine scaling up and distribution, especially in developing countries. In the effort to satisfy vaccine demands we developed a new single dose vaccine based on recombinant adenovirus type 26 (rAd26) vector carrying the gene for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike glycoprotein – “Sputnik Light”. Methods: We conducted an open label, two-stage, prospective, non-randomized phase I-II trial aimed to assess safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of “Sputnik Light” vaccine in a single center in Russia. Primary outcome measures were antigen-specific humoral immunity (Anti-RBD-SARS-Cov2 antibodies measured by ELISA on days 1, 10, 28, and 42) and safety (number of participants with adverse events monitored throughout the study). Secondary outcome measures were antigen-specific cellular immunity (measured by antigen-dependent CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell proliferation, number of antigen-specific interferon-γ-producing cells as well as interferon-γ concentration upon antigen restimulation) and change in neutralizing antibodies (measured in SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assay). The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04713488). Findings: Between January 14 and 27, 2021, 150 participants were screened, of whom 110 were enrolled. Most of solicited adverse reactions were mild (66.4% from all vaccinees), few were moderate (5.5%). No serious adverse events were detected. Assessment of Anti-RBD-SARS-Cov2 antibodies revealed group with pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Upon this finding we separated all safety and immunogenicity data according to pre-existing immunity to SARS-Cov2. There were notable differences in the vaccine effects on immunogenicity by the groups. Vaccination of seropositive (N=14) volunteers rapidly boosted RBD-specific IgGs from reciprocal geometric mean titer (​GMT) 594.4 at a baseline up to 26899 comparing to 29.09 in seronegative group (N=96) by day 10. By day 42 seroconversion rate reached 100% (93/93) in seronegative group with GMT 1648. At the same time in seropositive group seroconversion rate by day 42 was 92.9% (13/14) with GMT 19986. Analysis of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 showed 81.7% (76/93) and 92.9% (13/14) seroconversion rates by day 42 with median reciprocal GMT 15.18 and 579.7 in the seronegative and seropositive groups, respectively. Each test to assess cell-mediated immune reactions was carried out on a separate group of 30 volunteers on day 10 upon vaccination. Antigen-specific T cell proliferation, formation of IFNy-producing cells, as well as IFNy secretion were detected in 96.7% (26/27), 96% (24/25) and 96% (24/25) seronegative and in 100% (3/3) 100% (5/5) and 100% (5/5) seropositive vaccinees, correspondingly. Interpretation: The single dose rAd26 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine “Sputnik Light” has a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses both in seronegative and seropositive participants. Further investigation is needed to assess the effectiveness of this vaccine against COVID-19 used for primary and secondary vaccination. Clinical Trial Registration Details: The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04713488). Funding Information: Russian Direct Investment Fund. Declaration of Interests: OVZ, TAO, IVD, OP, DVS, DMG, ASD, AIT, DNS, IBE, EAT, AGB, ASE, FMI, NAN, NLL, ASS, SVB, BSN, DYL, ALG report patents for an immunobiological expression vector, pharmaceutical agent, and its method of use to prevent COVID-19. All other authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: The trial was approved by the local ethic committee and was conducted with the approval of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization and National Good Clinical Practice guidelines and Declaration of Helsinki.

The Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is an acute inflammatory disease of the respiratory system caused by the MERS-CoV coronavirus. The mortality rate for MERS is about 34.5%. Due to its high mortality rate, the lack of therapeutic and prophylactic agents, and the continuing threat of the spread of MERS beyond its current confines, developing a vaccine is a pressing task, because vaccination would help limit the spread of MERS and reduce its death toll. We have developed a combined vector vaccine for the prevention of MERS based on recombinant human adenovirus serotypes 26 and 5. Studies of its immunogenicity have shown that vaccination of animals (mice and primates) induces a robust humoral immune response that lasts for at least six months. Studies of the cellular immune response in mice after vaccination showed the emergence of a specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response. A study of the vaccine protectivity conducted in a model of transgenic mice carrying the human DPP4 receptor gene showed that our vaccination protected 100% of the animals from the lethal infection caused by the MERS-CoV virus (MERS-CoV EMC/2012, 100LD50 per mouse). Studies of the safety and tolerability of the developed vaccine in rodents, rabbits, and primates showed a good safety profile and tolerance in animals; they revealed no contraindications for clinical testing.

Summary Background We developed a heterologous COVID-19 vaccine consisting of two components, a recombinant adenovirus type 26 (rAd26) vector and a recombinant adenovirus type 5 (rAd5) vector, both carrying the gene for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike glycoprotein (rAd26-S and rAd5-S). We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of two formulations (frozen and lyophilised) of this vaccine. Methods We did two open, non-randomised phase 1/2 studies at two hospitals in Russia. We enrolled healthy adult volunteers (men and women) aged 18–60 years to both studies. In phase 1 of each study, we administered intramuscularly on day 0 either one dose of rAd26-S or one dose of rAd5-S and assessed the safety of the two components for 28 days. In phase 2 of the study, which began no earlier than 5 days after phase 1 vaccination, we administered intramuscularly a prime-boost vaccination, with rAd26-S given on day 0 and rAd5-S on day 21. Primary outcome measures were antigen-specific humoral immunity (SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies measured by ELISA on days 0, 14, 21, 28, and 42) and safety (number of participants with adverse events monitored throughout the study). Secondary outcome measures were antigen-specific cellular immunity (T-cell responses and interferon-γ concentration) and change in neutralising antibodies (detected with a SARS-CoV-2 neutralisation assay). These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04436471 and NCT04437875. Findings Between June 18 and Aug 3, 2020, we enrolled 76 participants to the two studies (38 in each study). In each study, nine volunteers received rAd26-S in phase 1, nine received rAd5-S in phase 1, and 20 received rAd26-S and rAd5-S in phase 2. Both vaccine formulations were safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were pain at injection site (44 [58%]), hyperthermia (38 [50%]), headache (32 [42%]), asthenia (21 [28%]), and muscle and joint pain (18 [24%]). Most adverse events were mild and no serious adverse events were detected. All participants produced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein. At day 42, receptor binding domain-specific IgG titres were 14 703 with the frozen formulation and 11 143 with the lyophilised formulation, and neutralising antibodies were 49·25 with the frozen formulation and 45·95 with the lyophilised formulation, with a seroconversion rate of 100%. Cell-mediated responses were detected in all participants at day 28, with median cell proliferation of 2·5% CD4+ and 1·3% CD8+ with the frozen formulation, and a median cell proliferation of 1·3% CD4+ and 1·1% CD8+ with the lyophilised formulation. Interpretation The heterologous rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine has a good safety profile and induced strong humoral and cellular immune responses in participants. Further investigation is needed of the effectiveness of this vaccine for prevention of COVID-19. Funding Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.