Search

AbstractTreatment strategies for early stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ES-DLBCL) include R-CHOP, with a similar schedule to that used in advanced stage, or a reduced number of cycles followed by radiation therapy (RT). We retrospectively analyzed 179 ES-DLBCL patients, managed according to the clinical practice. Treatment regimens include chemoimmunotherapy 4–6 cycles +/- RT as consolidation. First-line therapy was R-CHOP/CHOP-like in 88.8% of cases. RT as consolidation was administered to 29.9% of cases. Complete response rate was 87.2%, median PFS and OS were not reached. IPI 2–3 and first-line regimen with 3–4 cycles of R-CHOP without RT were the 2 prognostic variables for OS in multivariate analysis. After a median follow-up of 48 months, 31 patients died (17.3%). We suggest that both R-CHOP 6 cycles and 3–4 cycles followed by RT as consolidation seem to be valid first-line regimens, while an abbreviated strategy without RT could be associated to inferior outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Methods Results Conclusion Epigenetics has been shown to be relevant in oncology: BMI1 overexpression has been reported in leukemias, EZH2 mutations have been found in follicular lymphoma, and USP22 seems to stabilize BMI1 protein. In this study, we measured the expression of BMI1, EZH2, and USP22 in lymph nodes from 56 diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients.A new multiplex digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) has been set up to measure the expression of 4 genes (BMI1, EZH2, USP22, and GAPDH) in the same reaction on RNA extracted from paraffin‐embedded tissues.The specificity of ddPCR was confirmed by a 100% alignment on the BLAST platform and its repeatability demonstrated by duplicates. A strict correlation between expression of BMI1 and EZH2 and BMI1 and USP22 has been found, and high expression of these genes was correlated with extra‐nodal lymphomas. Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were conditioned by IPI, bone marrow infiltration, and the complete response achievement. High levels of BMI1 and USP22 did not condition the response to therapy, but impaired the PFS, especially for patients defined at “high risk” based on the cell of origin (no germinal center [GCB]), high BCL2 expression, and IPI 3‐5. In this subgroup, the probability of relapse/progression was twice higher than that of patients carrying low BMI1 and USP22 levels.High expression of BMI1 and of USP22 might be a poor prognostic factor in DLBCL, and might represent the target for novel inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]