Search

Abstract Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory skin disease, associated with multiple comorbidities and psychological and psychiatric disorders. The quality of life of patients with this disease is severely compromised, especially in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Secukinumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody, was the first anti-interleukin (IL)-17 biologic approved for treating psoriasis. Secukinumab demonstrated long-lasting efficacy and a good safety profile in individuals with plaque psoriasis, and it is associated with an improvement in health-related quality of life. While there is evidence that early treatment with systemic therapy can affect disease progression and improve long-term outcomes in other autoimmune diseases, evidence is limited in psoriasis, especially in real-world settings. This review provides an overview of studies describing the effectiveness of secukinumab in the treatment of psoriasis summarizing the literature and focusing on real-world evidence and early intervention.

Introduction: Psoriasis and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are chronic inflammatory diseases with significant overlap in their immunologic pathways, which involve cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alfa, interleukin (IL)-17, and IL-23. Current treatment options for HS are limited, as only adalimumab and secukinumab are approved for severe cases. Given the overlapping pathogenetic features between HS and psoriasis, anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs could represent valuable treatments for the management of HS. Objectives: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 drugs in patients with HS and concomitant moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in 11 Italian Dermatology Units. The effectiveness of the drugs was evaluated by assessing the percentage of patients achieving HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) each week. Results: We enrolled 41 patients with at least 16 weeks of follow-up, with 17 of them completing 52 weeks of treatment. The most commonly prescribed anti-IL drug was secukinumab (27 patients), followed by ixekizumab (5) and guselkumab (5). The HiSCR was achieved by 39%, 74.3%, and 77.8% of patients after 16, 32, and 52 weeks, respectively. No severe adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to discontinuation were observed during the study. The most common AE was nasopharyngitis (4 patients). Conclusion: In this real-world study, we highlight the effectiveness of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 drugs in the treatment of concomitant plaque psoriasis and severe HS. Longer and larger studies are needed to further evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of these treatments in patients affected by HS.

Abstract Introduction The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionized the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. In particular, ixekizumab, an inhibitor of interleukin-17A, has shown great results in terms of efficacy and safety in both clinical trials and real-world experiences. However, there is a lack of long-term real-world data available for ixekizumab. Methods We conducted a multicenter real-life study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI) was collected at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years. The occurrence of any adverse events was recorded at each time point. Results We enrolled 1096 patients treated with ixekizumab for at least 1 year. At week 52, the percentages of PASI 90 and PASI 100 were 85.04% and 69.07%, respectively. After 5 years of treatment with ixekizumab, out of 145 patients, a PASI 90 response was achieved by 86.90% of patients, while complete skin clearance was reached by 68.28% of patients. We did not observe any new significant safety findings throughout the study period. Conclusion This study supports the long-term effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real-world setting.

Abstract Introduction Several systemic therapies have been approved for the treatment of severe AD. In particular, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, recently received approval for the treatment of patients with severe AD after being evaluated in several clinical trials. However, a few concerns have been raised regarding their long-term safety and the management of these drugs in real-world clinical practice. In this article we described the results of a Delphi consensus aimed at describing the knowledge on JAKi and focusing, in particular, on providing clinical recommendations for dermatologists in daily practice regarding the use of these drugs. Methods Twelve Italian dermatologists reviewed the most recent literature regarding the efficacy and safety profiles of JAKi and proposed 24 statements. Results Agreement was reached for statements focusing on three main topics: (1) place in therapy of JAKi in patients with moderate-to-severe AD; (2) effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in different phenotypes; (3) different approaches to the management of patients treated with JAKi in clinical practice. The panel proposed several recommendations regarding all the statements. Conclusion Given the wide use of JAKi in clinical practice, it is crucial to establish a specific follow-up for each patient’s phenotype in order to achieve the best possible clinical outcome and minimize potential adverse events.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this multicenter observational study is to report data from real world on the use of bimekizumab in patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Elderly patients are poorly represented in clinical trials on bimekizumab for plaque psoriasis, and real-world studies are important to guide clinical choices.Materials and methods: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 33 dermatological outpatient clinics in Italy. Patients aged ≥ 65 years, with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and treated with bimekizumab were enrolled. No exclusion criteria were applied. Bimekizumab was administered following the Italian Guidelines for the management of plaque psoriasis and according to the summary of product characteristics, in adult patients who were candidates for systemic treatments. Overall, 98 subjects were included, and received bimekizumab up to week 36. Clinical and demographic data were collected before the initiation of treatment with bimekizumab. At baseline and each dermatological examination (4, 16, and 36 weeks), clinical outcomes were measured by the following parameters: (1) PASI score; (2) site-specific (scalp, palmoplantar, genital, nail) Psoriasis Global Assessment (PGA). At each visit, the occurrence of any adverse events (AEs) was recorded, including serious AEs and AEs leading to bimekizumab discontinuation.Results: The mean PASI score was 16.6 ± 9.4 at baseline and significantly decreased to 4.3 ± 5.2 after 4 weeks (p

AbstractPurpose Tildrakizumab is a selective inhibitor of IL-23 approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in two dosages. We conducted a 16-week multicenter retrospective study to compare the effectiveness and safety of tildrakizumab 200 mg versus tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a high disease burden or high body weight.Materials and methods Our retrospective study included 134 patients treated with tildrakizumab 200 mg and 364 patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg from 28 Italian Dermatology Units affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The patients had a body weight above 90 kg or a high disease burden (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥ 16 or the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas). We evaluated the effectiveness of tildrakizumab at the week-16 visit in terms of PASI90, PASI100 and absolute PASI ≤ 2.Results After 16 weeks of treatment with tildrakizumab 200 mg, PASI90 was reached by 57.5% of patients and PASI100 by 39.6% of patients. At the same time point, 34.3% and 24.2% of patients treated with tildrakizumab 100 mg achieved PASI90 and PASI100, respectively.Conclusions Our data suggest that tildrakizumab 200 mg has better effectiveness than tildrakizumab 100 mg in patients with a body weight ≥ 90 kg and a high disease burden.

Psoriasis is an inflammatory chronic disease of the skin typically located on the extensor surfaces of the body, and the trunk. Patients with psoriasis can often present multiple characteristics, such as lesions located in difficult-to-treat (DTT) areas or a high severity of the disease, which can negatively affect their quality of life. There is a lack of consensus in identifying the best therapy for these complex patient populations, especially after the failure of one or multiple lines of therapy. In this regard, we report a case series describing patients with psoriasis located in different DTT areas or presenting a high Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score at baseline and treated ineffectively with prior lines of therapy. Finally, patients achieved complete remission following therapy with tildrakizumab 200 mg (anti-IL-23p19), highlighting its potential efficacy in these patient populations.

Abstract Background Brodalumab, a fully human anti‐interleukin (IL)‐17 monoclonal antibody that blocks IL‐17RA, is approved in Europe for the treatment of adult patients with moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic treatment. Objectives This study evaluated the achievement and maintenance of therapeutic response for 1 year in psoriasis patients treated with brodalumab in the Italian clinical practice. Methods Real‐world, multicenter, observational, retrospective and prospective study. The retrospective phase ranged from enrolment visit to initiation of brodalumab (12 ± 4 weeks before). The prospective phase ranged from enrolment to a routine follow‐up visit set after 52 ± 4 weeks. Results One hundred eighty‐four patients were eligible and 164 completed the observation period (median 11.9 months; Q1–Q3: 11.4–12.3). At enrolment, the mean duration of disease was 13.9 years (standard deviation; 13.3), 94% of patients (N = 172) had ≥1 clinical manifestation of psoriasis, mainly erythema and itching, and 95.6% had received ≥1 antipsoriatic treatment before brodalumab. Patients who reached an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≤3 at week 12 and maintained it ≤3 through week 52 were 97 (64.7%). At week 12, 72.7% of patients achieved PASI 75, 54.5% PASI 90 and 42.0% PASI 100. At Week 52, 92.9% of patients achieved PASI 75, 84.4% PASI 90 and 61.7% PASI 100. A static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score = 0 was obtained by 55.0% of patients after 12 weeks of brodalumab and by 77.0% after 52 weeks. A Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤1 was reported by 71.9% of patients after 12 weeks and by 89.9% after 52 weeks of treatment. No significant outcome differences were shown among patient subgroups defined by previous antipsoriatic treatments (none, systemic other than biologics or biologic) at either brodalumab initiation or any of the subsequent study visits. Conclusions In this real‐world setting, brodalumab was rapidly effective on skin lesions and quality of life both in biologic‐naïve and biologic‐experienced moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis patients, with a favourable safety profile.

Filomena Russo,1 Marco Galluzzo,2,3 Luca Stingeni,4 Severino Persechino,5 Leonardo Zichichi,6 Andrea Conti,7 Claudia Giofrè,8 Valentina Dini,9 Martina Vispi,10 Laura Atzori,11 Angelo Cattaneo,12 Aurora Parodi,13 Federico Bardazzi,14 Giuseppe Stinco,15 Paolo Dapavo,16 Giampiero Girolomoni,17 Maria Letizia Musumeci,18 Manuela Papini,19 Marina Venturini,20 Stefano Dastoli,21 Sergio Di Nuzzo,22 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,23 Gianluca Pagnanelli,24 Nicoletta Bernardini,25 Daniele Mario Gambini,26 Piergiorgio Malagoli,27 Carlo Mazzatenta,28 Ketty Peris,29 Iris Zalaudek,30 Gabriella Fabbrocini31 ,† Francesco Loconsole,32 Camilla Vassallo,33 Lucia Pietroleonardo,34 Francesca Prignano,35 Chiara Franchi,36 Anna Maria Offidani,37 Claudio Bonifati,38 Vito Di Lernia,39 Giovanni Gigante,40 Marta Silvia Bartezaghi,40 Matteo Franchi,41,42 Paola Ursoleo,40 Elisabetta Aloisi40 1Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 2Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 4Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 5Dermatology Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine & Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 6Unit of Dermatology, San Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy; 7Section of Dermatology, Department of Specialized Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 8U.O.C. Dermatologia, A.O. Papardo, Messina, Italy; 9Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 10Dermatology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; 11Dermatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 13Section of Dermatology, DiSSal University of Genoa, Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy; 14Dermatology Division, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 16Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 17Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 18Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 19Dermatology Clinic of Terni, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 20Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 21Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy; 22Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 23Section of Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 24Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 25Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit, “Daniele Innocenzi”, Asl Latina, Italy; 26Dermatology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; 27Dermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; 28Dermatology Unit, Lucca Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy; 29Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy; 30Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 31Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 32Department of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 33Institute of Dermatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 34Dermatology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy; 35Dermatology Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 36Dermatology Unit, IRCCS IO Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 37Dermatological Clinic, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy; 38Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 39Dermatology Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; 40Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 41National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy; 42Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy†Gabriella Fabbrocini passed away on 3 March 2023Correspondence: Filomena Russo, Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy, Email file.russo@libero.itPurpose: SUPREME, a phase IIIb study conducted in Italy, demonstrated safety and high efficacy of secukinumab for up to 72 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. SUPREME 2.0 study aimed to provide real-world data on the long-term drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab beyond 72 weeks.Patients and Methods: SUPREME 2.0 is a retrospective observational chart review study conducted in patients previously enrolled in SUPREME study. After the end of the SUPREME study, eligible patients continued treatment as per clinical practice, and their effectiveness and drug survival data were retrieved from medical charts.Results: Of the 415 patients enrolled in the SUPREME study, 297 were included in SUPREME 2.0; of which, 210 (70.7%) continued secukinumab treatment throughout the 42-month observation period. Patients in the biologic-naïve cohort had higher drug survival than those in the biologic-experienced cohort (74.9% vs 61.7%), while HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA-Cw6–negative patients showed similar drug survival (69.3% and 71.9%). After 42 months, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 was achieved by 79.6% of patients overall; with a similar proportion of biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients achieving PASI90 (79.8% and 79.1%). The mean absolute PASI score reduced from 21.94 to 1.38 in the overall population, 21.90 to 1.24 in biologic-naïve and 22.03 to 1.77 in biologic-experienced patients after 42 months. The decrease in the absolute PASI score was comparable between HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA–Cw6-negative patients. The baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index scores also decreased in the overall patients (10.5 to 2.32) and across all study sub-groups after 42 months. Safety was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab, with no new findings.Conclusion: In this real-world cohort study, secukinumab showed consistently high long-term drug survival and effectiveness with a favourable safety profile.Keywords: psoriasis, secukinumab, real-world evidence, drug survival, SUPREME

(1) Background/Objectives: Nail psoriasis (NP) is a chronic and difficult-to-treat disease, which causes significant social stigma and impairs the patients’ quality of life. Moreover, nail psoriasis is a true therapeutic challenge for clinicians. The presence of nail psoriasis can be part of a severe form of psoriasis and can have predictive value for the development of psoriatic arthritis. Our real-world-evidence multicenter study aims to evaluate the efficacy of bimekizumab in nail psoriasis. (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter observational study included 834 patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis, in 33 Dermatologic Units in Italy, treated with bimekizumab from December 2022 to September 2023. Clinimetric assessments were based on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Physician’s Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis (PGA-F) for the severity of nail psoriasis at 0, 12, 24, and 36 weeks. (3) Results: Psoriatic nail involvement was present in 27.95% of patients. The percentage of patients who achieved a complete clearance of NP in terms of PGA-F 0 was 31.7%, 57%, and 88.5% at week 4, 16, and 36, respectively. PASI 100 was achieved by 32.03% of patients at week 4, by 61.8% at week 16, and by 78.92% of patients at week 36. The mean baseline PASI was 16.24. The mean DLQI values for the entire group of patients at baseline, at week 4, at week 16, and at week 36 were 14.62, 3.02, 0.83, and 0.5, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Therapies that promote the healing of both the skin and nails in a short time can also ensure a lower risk of subsequently developing arthritis which is disabling over time. Bimekizumab proved to be particularly effective to treat NP, with a fast response in terms of complete clearance, with over 88.5% of patients free from NP after 36 weeks. The findings of our real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe PsO and concomitant NP had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in NP up to 36 weeks with respect to previous research findings. Considering the rapid healing of the nail, the dual inhibition of IL17 A and F might have a great value in re-establishing the dysregulation of keratin 17 at the nail level.

Introduction: Genital involvement is observed in approximately 60% of patients with psoriasis, presenting clinicians with formidable challenges in treatment. While new biologic drugs have emerged as safe and effective options for managing psoriasis, their efficacy in challenging-to-treat areas remains inadequately explored. Intriguingly, studies have shown that interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors exhibit effectiveness in addressing genital psoriasis. Objectives: We aimed to determine the effectiveness profile of bimekizumab in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with involvement of genitalia. Methods: Bimekizumab, a dual inhibitor of both IL-17A and IL-17F, was the focus of our 16-week study, demonstrating highly favorable outcomes for patients with genital psoriasis. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of improvement in Static Physician's Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. Results: Sixty-five adult patients were enrolled. Remarkably, 98.4% of our participants achieved a clear sPGA-G score (s-PGA-g=0) within 16 weeks. Moreover, consistent improvements were observed in PASI scores, accompanied by a significant reduction in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), signifying enhanced quality of life. Notably, none of the patients reported a severe impairment in their quality of life after 16 weeks of treatment. In our cohort of 65 patients, subgroup analyses unveiled that the effectiveness of bimekizumab remained unaffected by prior exposure to other biologics or by obesity. Conclusions: Our initial findings suggest that bimekizumab may serve as a valuable treatment option for genital psoriasis. Nevertheless, further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is imperative to conclusively validate these results.

Valentina Celoria,* Francois Rosset,* Valentina Pala, Paolo Dapavo, Simone Ribero, Pietro Quaglino, Luca Mastorino Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Valentina Celoria, Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy, Email valentina.celoria@edu.unito.itAbstract: The skin microbiome is made of various microorganisms, most of which have the function of protecting individuals from harmful pathogens, and they are involved in innate and adaptive immune responses. The skin acts as a physical and immunological barrier against external stimuli, including pathogens and physical damage. Changes in the composition of the skin microbiome can trigger inflammatory processes leading to inflammatory skin diseases in susceptible individuals. Psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a multifactorial etiology, where breakdown of immune tolerance to cutaneous microorganisms is implicated in its pathogenesis. Dysregulation of the microbiome due to genetic and environmental factors plays a significant role in the development of psoriatic disease. Dermatologic conditions such as atopic dermatitis, acne, psoriasis, and rosacea have been associated with intestinal dysbiosis. The skin microbiota composition is crucial for the development of appropriate immune responses, and alterations in the skin microbiome can contribute to changes in physiology and susceptibility to skin diseases or inflammatory conditions. Understanding the microbial settlement of the skin and the network of interactions that occur throughout life is essential for comprehending the pathogenesis of skin diseases and developing innovative treatments. With this article we tried to explore the relationship between the human microbiome and psoriatic disease, shedding light on the functions of the microbiome and the inflammatory disease processes to identify additional therapeutic targets. This review aims to highlight the relationship between skin and gut microbiome functions and inflammatory processes in skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The goal is to facilitate future studies on the skin microbiome to identify potential novel therapies for patients with psoriatic disease.Keywords: psoriasis, skin microbiome, new therapies, gut microbiome, molecular precision medicines, next generation treatments

IntroductionThe development of several effective biological drugs for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis has dramatically changed the lives of patients. Despite the wide use of interleukin (IL) inhibitors, limited data are available to date regarding long-term treatment persistence.MethodThis multicenter retrospective real-world study evaluated 5932 treatment courses across 5300 patients, all treated with interleukin inhibitors. Drug survival was expressed by using the Kaplan-Meier estimator for each biological drug at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. We also stratified by discontinuation associated with primary or secondary ineffectiveness.ResultsIn our study, the most prescribed drugs were secukinumab (1412), ixekizumab (1183), and risankizumab (977). After four years of follow-up, risankizumab emerged as the treatment with the highest drug survival overall, as 91.6% of patients were still on treatment. The overall probability of drug survival at four years was comparable for tildrakizumab (83.5%), ixekizumab (82.6%), guselkumab (82.4%) and brodalumab (81.8%). When evaluating only patients who discontinued the treatment because of ineffectiveness, once again risankizumab was the molecule with the highest drug survival at 4 years (93.4%), this time followed by ixekizumab (87%). Our study, in which all IL inhibitors were adequately represented, confirmed a slightly better treatment persistence for IL-23 inhibitors, consistent with other real-world studies.ConclusionOur experience showed that IL-23 inhibitors, and risankizumab in particular, had a higher probability of drug survival overall during a 4-year follow-up. Risankizumab and ixekizumab were less likely to be discontinued because of ineffectiveness after four years.

Purpose Ixekizumab is a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The objective of this study was to describe the real-world long-term effectiveness of ixekizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis in Italy. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were continuously treated with ixekizumab for at least 12 months. Patient data was obtained at 4-weeks, 12-weeks and 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months after baseline (June 2017 and September 2019) from 10 sites. Results were analyzed by complete case approach, with sensitivity analysis performed to evaluate the impact of missing data. Results A total of 198 patients were enrolled in the study. At Month 24, 94.3% of patients achieved PASI75 response, while 85.1 and 71.8% achieved PASI90 and PASI100, respectively; and 91.1% of the patients achieved absolute PASI score ≤2. Patients experienced psoriasis improvement at 4 weeks after starting treatment, and improvement was maintained with continued ixekizumab use. The quality of life of patients also improved significantly starting at Week 12, with sustained effect in the long term. Conclusion This 24-month observational cohort study confirmed that ixekizumab is effective in the long-term management of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Abstract Background After decades of use, methotrexate displays an established safety and efficacy profile in both in-hospital and outpatient settings. Despite its widespread use, there is surprisingly little clinical evidence to guide daily practice with methotrexate in dermatology. Objectives To provide guidance for clinicians in daily practice for areas in which there is limited guidance. Methods A Delphi consensus exercise on 23 statements was carried out on the use of methotrexate in dermatological routine settings. Results Consensus was reached on statements that cover six main areas: (1) pre-screening exams and monitoring of therapy; (2) dosing and administration in patients naïve to methotrexate; (3) optimal strategy for patients in remission; (4) use of folic acid; (5) safety; and (6) predictors of toxicity and efficacy. Specific recommendations are provided for all 23 statements. Conclusions In order to optimize methotrexate efficacy, it is essential to optimize treatment using appropriate dosages, carrying out a rapid drug-based step-up on a treat-to-target strategy and preferably using the subcutaneous formulation. To manage safety aspects appropriately, it is essential to evaluate patients’ risk factors and carry out proper monitoring during the course of treatment.

Marina Talamonti,1 Filomena Russo,2 Giovanna Malara,3,4 Katharina Hansel,5 Manuela Papini,6 Angelo Cattaneo,7 Aurora Parodi,8 Andrea Chiricozzi,9,10 Piergiorgio Malagoli,11 Federico Bardazzi,12 Valeria Brazzelli,13 Paolo Dapavo,14 Paolo Gisondi,15 Cristina Zane,16 Concetta Potenza,17 Franca Cantoresi,18 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,19 Sara Trevisini,20 Pina Brianti,21 Leonardo Pescitelli,22 Giovanni Gigante,23 Marta Bartezaghi,23 Luisa Caputo,23 Elisabetta Aloisi,23 Antonio Costanzo24,25 On behalf of the SUPREME Study Group1Dermatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy; 2Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, Dermatology Section, University of Siena, S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Hospital “Bianchi Melacrino Morelli”, Reggio, Calabria, Italy; 4Department of Dermatology, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy; 5Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 6Dermatologic Clinic of Terni, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 7U.O. Dermatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 8Di.S.Sal. Section of Dermatology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova GE, 16132, Italy; 9UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 10Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; 11Psocare Unit, I.R.C.C.S Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 13Dermatology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 14Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Second Dermatologic Clinic, University of Torino, Torino, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 16Dermatology Department, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 17Dermatology Unit “Daniele Innocenzi”, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome – Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy; 18Dermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Roma, Roma, Italy; 19Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 20Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 21Dermatology and Cosmetology Unit - San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; 22Department of Health Sciences, Dermatology Clinic, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy; 23Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 24Unit of Dermatology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milano, Italy; 25Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milano, ItalyCorrespondence: Marina Talamonti, Dermatology-Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, PTV – Policlinico Tor Vergata, V.le Oxford 81, Rome, 00133, Italy, Tel +39 0620902743, Fax +39 0620902742, Email talamonti.marina@gmail.comPurpose: Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults and children. We compared the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients aged < 65 years (adult patients) versus patients aged ≥ 65 years (elderly patients) in a post-hoc analysis of the SUPREME study.Patients and Methods: Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg per week for the first 5 weeks, then 300 mg per month. We compared the following outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years vs < 65 years: baseline characteristics; PASI50/75/90/100 response rates (improvements ≥ 50%/75%/90%/100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline); changes in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-A, HAD-D) score changes; treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).Results: Secukinumab was slightly less effective in elderly patients than in adult patients (response rates at week 16: PASI90, 69.4% vs 80.9%, p = 0.4528; PASI100, 44.4% vs 56.7%, p = 0.8973). Elderly and adult patients showed a similar time course of changes in absolute PASI scores. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had a statistically significantly lower improvement in quality of life (mean DLQI reduction) than patients aged < 65 years at week 16 [− 5.4 (± 4.3) vs − 8.8 (± 6.9), p = 0.0065] and at week 24 [− 5.3 (± 4.4) vs − 9.2 (± 7.1), p = 0.0038]. Secukinumab treatment resulted in comparable mean reductions in anxiety and depression scores in both cohorts at 24 weeks [HAD-A, − 1.3 (± 3.3) vs − 2.1 (± 3.8), p = 0.9004; HAD-D, − 1.0 (± 3.3) vs − 1.5 (± 3.1), p = 0.4598]. The frequency of TEAEs in the two cohorts was similar (16.7% vs 14.6%, p = 0.7391).Conclusion: Secukinumab is a valid option for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in elderly patients.Keywords: psoriasis, biologics, interleukin-17A, secukinumab, elderly

IntroductionBimekizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets Interleukin-17 A and F, approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. While bimekizumab has been evaluated in several phase-III clinical trials, real-world evidence is still very limited.MethodThis multicenter retrospective study included patients affected by plaque psoriasis treated with bimekizumab from May 1, 2022 to April 30, 2023, at 19 Italian referral hospitals. Patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatments were included. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) compared with baseline at weeks 4 and 16. The main outcomes were the percentages of patients achieving an improvement of at least 75% (PASI75), 90% (PASI90) and 100% (PASI100) in PASI score.ResultsThe study included 237 patients who received at least one injection of bimekizumab. One hundred and seventy-one patients and 114 reached four and 16 weeks of follow-up, respectively. Complete skin clearance was achieved by 43.3% and 75.4% of patients at weeks 4 and 16, respectively. At week 16, 86.8% of patients reported no impact on their quality of life. At week 16, there were no significant differences between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients in terms of PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100. The most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) were oral candidiasis (10.1%). No severe AEs or AEs leading to discontinuation were observed throughout the study.ConclusionOur experience supports the effectiveness and tolerability of bimekizumab in a real-world setting with similar results compared with phase-III clinical trials.

IntroductionBrodalumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets the subunit A of the interleukin-17A receptor (IL17RA), inhibiting the signaling of various isoforms of the IL-17 family. It has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after being evaluated in three Phase-3 trials. However, long-term data on brodalumab in a real-life setting are still limited.MethodsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of brodalumab in psoriasis. We also assessed the drug survival of brodalumab in a 3 years timespan. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study on 606 patients followed up at 14 Italian dermatology units, all treated with brodalumab according to Italian guidelines. Patients’ demographics and disease characteristics were retrieved from electronic databases. At baseline and weeks 12, 24, 52, 104 and 156, we evaluated the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score and investigated for adverse events. The proportions of patients reaching 75, 90 and 100% (PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100, respectively) improvement in PASI, compared with baseline, were also recorded.ResultsAt week 12, 63.53% of the patients reached PASI 90 and 49.17% PASI 100. After 3 years of treatment, 65.22% of patients maintained a complete skin clearance, and 91.30% had an absolute PASI of 2 or less. Patients naïve to biological therapies had better clinical responses at weeks 12, 24 and 52. However, after 2 years of treatment, no significant differences were observed. Body mass index did not interfere with the effectiveness of brodalumab throughout the study. No new safety findings were recorded. After 36 months, 85.64% of our patients were still on treatment with brodalumab.ConclusionOur data confirm the effectiveness and the safety of brodalumab in the largest real-life cohort to date, up to 156 weeks.

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Background: In psoriasis, several studies have indicated sex differences in clinical characteristics, type of treatment, and outcomes. A higher impact of psoriasis on quality of life (QoL) and a lower treatment satisfaction have been reported in women by different authors. Objectives: This article reports the results of a post hoc gender analysis of CANOVA study, aimed at assessing 16/24/52-week effectiveness of biologics in patients with moderate-severe plaque psoriasis. Materials and Methods: CANOVA was a real-world, multicenter, noninterventional, retro-prospective study conducted in 17 Italian hospital dermatology clinics. Results: Of the 669 eligible patients, 63.8% were men. Demographic and baseline characteristics and duration of disease were rather homogeneous between sexes. Slightly more women had been treated with biologics (50.4% vs. 46.5%) and had received ?2 biologic treatment lines (17.2% vs. 12.4%) before study treatment. The most frequently used biologics were secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and ixekizumab in both sexes. At 6 months, Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 responders were 90.8%/72.3%/45.3% of men and 89.2%/76.6%/48.2% of women. Sustained PASI responders were 79.5% of men and 75.9% of women. Treatment satisfaction was significantly lower in women at enrolment for all subscales, and was still lower at 6 months, no longer significantly. Gender distribution in Dermatology Life Quality Index total score classes showed a significantly greater effect of psoriasis on QoL in women, both at enrolment and at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: In conclusion, this gender analysis confirms in both genders the efficacy of biologics in psoriasis. However, women reported a greater impact of the disease on QoL and lower treatment satisfaction.

Abstract Background Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease which can also involve joints. It is often associated with burdensome comorbidities which negatively impact prognosis and quality of life (QoL). Biologic agents have been shown to be effective in controlling disease progression, but their use is associated with higher costs compared with traditional systemic treatments. The economic analysis of the CANOVA (EffeCtiveness of biologic treAtmeNts for plaque psOriasis in Italy: an obserVAtional longitudinal study of real-life clinical practice) study aims to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of biologics in a real-world context in Italy. Methods The annualised overall direct costs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis management, the annualised cost of biologic drugs and the cost per responder in the Italian National Health System perspective were assessed. More specifically, the cost per response and cost per sustained response of the most prescribed biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis within the CANOVA study were assessed using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at several score levels (75, 90 and 100%). Results The most frequently used biologic therapies for plaque psoriasis were secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab originator, and ixekizumab. Cost of biologics was the driver of expenditure, accounting for about 98% of total costs. Adalimumab originator was the biologic with the lowest cost per responder ratio (range: €7848 - €31,378), followed by secukinumab (range: €9015 - €33,419). Ustekinumab (range: €11,689 – €39,280) and ixekizumab (range: €11,092 – €34,289) ranked respectively third and fourth, in terms of cost-effectiveness ratio. As concerns the cost per sustained response analysis, secukinumab showed the lowest value observed (€21,375) over the other options, because of its high response rate (86% vs. 60–80%), which was achieved early in time. Conclusion Biologic therapy is a valuable asset for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Concomitant assessment of treatment costs against the expected therapeutic response over time can provide physicians and payers additional insights which can complement the traditional risk-benefit profile assessment and drive treatment decisions.

Psoriatic patients with latent tuberculosis infection and properly treated active tuberculosis need careful management when prescribing modern biological drugs. Although data and guidelines regarding tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors advise caution and initiation of prophylactic therapy in patients with latent tuberculosis infection, the same indications do not seem to find equal force for interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-17 inhibitors. In order to evaluate the risk of reactivation in patients with latent tuberculosis infection or properly treated active tuberculosis, an observational retrospective study was conducted on the population referred to our centre at Dermatologic Clinic of University of Turin, Italy. In the last 10 years at the clinic 19 psoriatic patients were found to be at risk of tuberculosis reactivation: 10 patients were QuantiFERON- TB-positive at baseline, 2 became positive during treatment, 6 reported prior tuberculous infection, and 1 was QuantiFERON-TB-negative at baseline and developed disseminated tuberculosis during treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor-α. Overall, 10.5% of this group of patients developed active tuberculosis; however, stratifying by biologic therapy, zero cases were observed among patients treated with anti-IL-17, -23, or -12/23 over a relatively long follow-up (48.1 months) A review of the available literature following our experience confirms the increased risk of tuberculosis reactivation with tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors. Concerning anti-IL-23 and IL-17 drugs, available data showed high safety in patients at risk of tuberculosis reactivation. Screening of patients who should be taking IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors is recommended for public health purposes. In case of a positive result with these therapies, consulting with an infectious diseases specialist is suggested in order to weigh up the risks and benefits of prophylactic treatment.

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Background: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, severe inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent episodes of flares. Characteristics of patients experiencing a flare are hardly described in a real-life setting. The aim of the study is to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients experiencing a flare of GPP. Methods: Multicenter retrospective observational study on consecutive patients experiencing a flare of GPP between 2018 and 2022. Disease severity and quality of life were assessed by Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area, Body Surface Area (BSA), and Severity Index (GPPASI), and Dermatology life quality index (DLQI) questionnaire, respectively. Visual analogue scale (VAS) of itch and pain, triggers, complications, comorbidities, pharmacological therapies, and outcome were collected. Results: A total of 66 patients, 45 (68.2%) females, mean age 58.1 ± 14.9 years, were included. The GPPASI, BSA, and DLQI were 22.9 ± 13.5 (mean ± standard deviation), 47.9 ± 29.1, and 21.0 ± 5.0, respectively. The VAS of itch and pain were 6.2 ± 3.3 and 6.2 ± 3.0, respectively. Fever (>38 °C) and leukocytosis (WBC > 12 × 109/L) were found in 26 (39.4%) and 39 (59.1%) patients, respectively. Precipitating triggers were identified in 24 (36.3%) and included infections (15.9%), drugs (10.6%), stressful life events (7.6%), and corticosteroids withdrawal (3.0%). Fourteen (21.2%) patients were hospitalized because of complications including infections in 9 (13.6%) leading to death in one case and hepatitis in 3 (4.5%). Conclusions: GPP flares can be severe and cause severe pain and itch with significant impact on the quality of life. In about one-third of patients the flare may have a persistent course and, with complications, lead to hospitalization.

not available

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds the p19 subunit of interleukin-23. It is approved for treatment of moderate-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. This retrospective study included 66 consecutive adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris treated with risankizumab in monotherapy up to week 40 in a “real-life” setting. At week 40, 98.7%, 85.7% and 62.3% of patients achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) reduction ≥ 75% (PASI 75), PASI 90 and PASI 100, respectively. Patients who had not responded to 2 or more previous biologic treatments were significantly less likely to achieve PASI 75/90 at week 16 and PASI 90/100 at week 40 compared with those who had been previously treated with only 1 biologic, and compared with those treated with risankizumab as a first-line biologic. Increasing body mass index decreased the chances of reaching PASI 90 at week 40. No significant safety findings were recorded throughout the study, and none of the patients had to interrupt the treatment. These data suggest that the efficacy of risankizumab for plaque psoriasis in “real-life” clinical practice could differ from pivotal clinical trials data.

Secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, neutralizes interleukin-17A, a cornerstone cytokine driving the multiple manifestations of psoriasis. This post-hoc analysis of the SUPREME study was performed to determine the sustainability of response to secukinumab in terms of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Based on PASI 90 response at week 16, patients were stratified as PASI 90 responders (PASI90R, n = 337) or non-responders (PASI90NR, n = 72). At week 20, 94.2% (n = 295/313) achieved PASI 90/100 response in PASI90R, with response maintained through week 48 (89.6%, n = 189/211). An increased proportion of patients achieved PASI 90/100 response in PASI90NR (week 20: 29.9%, n = 20/67; week 48: 57.1%, n = 20/35). Overall, 64.4% patients achieved absolute PASI score = 0 at week 24 with response sustained to week 48 (66.9%). Secukinumab showed sustained and stable efficacy in maintaining PASI 90 response in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to week 48.

This study aimed to compare adalimumab originator vs. biosimilar in HS patients, and to evaluate the effect of a switch to a biosimilar, or a switch back to the originator, in terms of treatment ineffectiveness. Patients with a diagnosis of HS were enrolled from 14 Italian sites. Treatment ineffectiveness was measured using Hurley score. The major analyses were 1) comparison between the two treatment groups (non-switcher analysis), and 2) the cross-over trend of Hurley score between treatment switchers (switcher analysis). Cox and Poisson regression models were used to compare the treatment ineffectiveness between groups. A total of 326 patients were divided into four groups: 171 (52.5%) taking originator; 61 (18.7%) patients taking biosimilar; 66 (20.2%) switchers; 28 (8.6%) switchers from originator to biosimilar and switched. A greater loss of efficacy was observed in the group allocated to the biosimilar than the originator group. The switcher analysis showed an effectiveness loss in the biosimilar compared to the originator. These results seem to indicate that a switch from one drug to the other may lead to a greater risk of inefficacy. A return to the previous treatment also does not ensure efficaciousness.

Introduction: Ixekizumab proved to be effective and safe for psoriasis treatment in several randomized clinical trials and real‐life studies. Nevertheless, long‐term real‐world experiences are still lacking, with little data up to 4 years of treatment. Objectives: To analyse survival, effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a real‐life cohort of patients affected by moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis up to 260 weeks (5 years). Methods: We included all patients treated with ixekizumab from December 2017 to March 2021. Drug survival (DS) was analysed in patients at risk for up to 5 years. Cox analysis was adopted to evaluate possible predictive factors of discontinuation. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (meanPASI and PASI100, 90, and ≤3) was used as outcomes of effectiveness on observed patients at 16, 52, 104, 156, 208 and 260 weeks. Logistic regression was performed to identify possible predictive factors of response. Results: DS was 65.5% at 260 weeks, with being a super‐responder patient (achievement of PASI100 at 16 weeks and maintained at 28 weeks) correlated with less risk of discontinuation. PASI100, 90 and ≤3 was achieved by 54.1%, 60.5% and 73% of observed patients, respectively, at 16 weeks, and by 59.1%, 81.8% and 95.5%, respectively, at 260 weeks. High mean BMI was the only factor strongly associated with less achievement of the outcomes at the earlier time points: PASI100 at 16 weeks (OR 0.93, CI 0.87–0.98, p = 0.014) and at 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.84–0.98, p = 0.019), PASI90 achievement at 16 weeks (OR 0.94, CI 0.88–0.99, p = 0.028) and 104 weeks (OR 0.91, CI 0.83–0.99, p = 0.027), and PASI ≤3 (OR 0.86, CI 0.76–0.97, p = 0.018) at 104 weeks. No severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Ixekizumab showed high effectiveness and safety for up to 5 years, with survival of 2/3 of treated patients. Rapid response to treatment is predictive of long‐term response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Upon the association of biologic treatments with reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), screening for Mycobacterium tuberculosisinfection and anti-tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis in positive patients are required prior to biologic drug administration. Nevertheless, the risk of infection relapses associated with biologic drugs seems to be different. No cases of reactivation of LTBI have been observed in secukinumab-treated subjects, in contrast with clinical reports on the risk associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor α-based therapy. Twelve patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment and found to have LTBI received secukinumab without previous chemoprophylaxis initiation because of clinical contraindication for 10 cases and refusal by 2 patients. None of them had tuberculosis reactivation.

Introduction: In Italy, the real-world evidence on the extent of adherence to guidelines and the benefits of recommended therapeutic medications and their impact on the quality of life (QoL) of H1-antihistamines (H1-AH) refractory chronic urticaria (CU) patients is limited. Methods: AWARE (A World-wide Antihistamine-Refractory chronic urticaria patient Evaluation) was a global prospective, non-interventional study of CU in real-world setting which included patients aged ≥18 years with a medically confirmed diagnosed of CU present for more than 2 months. In this study, the disease characteristics, pharmacological treatments and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are reported. Results: In total, 159 patients from 24 study centres in Italy completed the study. At baseline, 221 (89.5%) and 8 (3.2%) patients had chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), respectively, while 18 (7.3%) patients had concomitant CSU and CIndU. For CSU patients, mean dermatology life quality index and CU quality of life questionnaire scores reduced to 3.0 ± 4.9 and 14.6 ± 18.6 at Month 24 from baseline scores of 7.5 ± 6.6 and 33.2 ± 19.5, respectively, indicating an improvement in QoL. This was reflected in their work-life as work productivity impairment reduced considerably after 2 years. Only 71.9% CSU patients had a prior treatment, while during the study, 96.8% of the patients were treated with a medication. At baseline, only 52.9% CSU patients reported nonsedating H1-antihistamines as first-line of treatment in prior medication, this increased to 89.6% during current medication. Conclusion: This study shows that CSU has a considerable socio-economic burden and an improvement in QoL can be achieved in CSU patients if an appropriate therapeutic path is followed.

BACKGROUND:Knowledge regarding differences in care for psoriatic patients is limited. The aim of this study was to investigate factors influencing prescription of systemic treatments for patients with psoriasis with a special focus on socioeconomic factors. METHODS AND FINDINGS:This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional study, conducted in 18 Italian University and/or hospital centers with psoriasis-specialized units. Questionnaires evaluating demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were administered to participants. Overall, 1880 consecutive patients affected by mild-to-severe psoriasis were recruited. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses of systemic therapy prescription, with a special focus on biologics, accounting for the above mentioned characteristics were performed. Our analysis showed that all analyzed patients' characteristics were significantly associated with biological therapy compared to non-biological systemic one. Particularly, women were less likely to receive biologics than men (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.77). Elderly patients (≥65 years) and subjects with a BMI ≥30 had lower odds to receive biologics respect to adults (≥35-64 years) (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40), and subjects with BMI≥25