Search

Neurological syndromes occur in a significant number of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. The optimal management for these patients however remains uncertain. Our study is a descriptive analysis looking retrospectively at 45 patients who presented to the principal tertiary referral centre in the Australian Capital Territory, with either cerebral arterial or venous thrombosis for which there was no obvious cause for their presentation when initially reviewed. The diagnosis was based on the clinical findings made by one of three neurologists attached to our centre. Radiological findings and the presence of either IgM or IgG anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG anti-beta-2 glycoprotein 1 antibodies or a lupus anticoagulant were then documented. In this group of patients three subgroups were identified: 1. Individuals that fulfilled the Sapporo Classification Criteria 2. Individuals with transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies and 3. Individuals with persistently low positive antiphospholipid antibodies. The most interesting of these three groups are those individuals with transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. A potential cause for presentation was identified in only one patient of this group with documented infective endocarditis and bacteraemia. Comparison with the other two groups suggested that there was little in terms of clinical presentation, radiological findings or intercurrent risk factors for thrombotic disease to distinguish between them. With disappearance of antiphospholipid antibodies, the individuals within this group have not had further thrombotic events. Our observations emphasise the problems that continue to exist in relation to the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease in the context of antiphospholipid antibodies and the optimal management of these stratified groups. Our findings also raise an as yet unanswered question as to the significance of these transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. In the absence of significant intercurrent risk factors our findings would suggest that in the group we describe that they are likely to be of clinical significance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial-onset seizures in a protocol designed to reflect clinical practice. Methods: All patients in this open-label, single-arm study entered an 8-week baseline period followed by a 4-week titration period and a 12-week maintenance period. Patients initially received levetiracetam 1000mg/day (administered bid) and could increase to 2000mg/day after 2 weeks, and to 3000mg/day after another 2 weeks, to obtain adequate seizure control. During the 12-week maintenance period, the dose of levetiracetam could not be increased but could be decreased once if tolerability warranted. Seizure count and adverse events were recorded by patients in a diary. Quality of life and global evaluation of disease evolution were also evaluated. Results: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled and 91 completed the study. A steady dose was maintained over the last 8 weeks of treatment or longer in 84 patients, with 89.3% of these patients receiving 3000mg/day, 9.5% receiving 2000mg/day, and 1.2% receiving 1000mg/day. A 35.9% median percent reduction from baseline in weekly frequency of partial-onset seizures was observed over the entire treatment period. The median partial-onset seizure count decreased from 2.3 per week during the baseline period to 1.3 per week over the treatment period. A total of 42.4% of patients were responders (≥50% reduction from baseline in weekly seizure frequency) over the treatment period; two patients were seizure-free from the first day of treatment throughout the treatment period. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were fatigue (27.3% of patients), somnolence (11.1%), headache (8.1%), and dizziness (8.1%). Conclusion: Levetiracetam as add-on therapy at doses up to 3000mg/day effectively reduced the frequency of partial-onset seizures in patients with refractory epilepsy and was well-tolerated in this study, bridging conditions of placebo-controlled clinical trials and clinical practice. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and impact on quality of life of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. Methods: AUS-STEPS was an open-label, multicenter, prospective study in patients experiencing partial seizures who were inadequately controlled with one to three concurrent antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). GBP treatment was titrated to a maximum of 4,800 mg/day, over a treatment period of 24 weeks, to achieve an efficacious and tolerable dosage. Efficacy was assessed by seizure-frequency data. Quality of life was evaluated by using the QOLIE-10 questionnaire, and safety was assessed by adverse-event reports and clinical laboratory findings. Results: A total of 176 patients received treatment with GBP, with 174 evaluable for intention-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analysis. A reduction of >50% in overall seizure frequency was observed in 93 patients (53%). There was a small (4.6%) overall improvement in QOLIE-10 score. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (31%), fatigue (29%), somnolence (27%), headache (21%), and ataxia (20%), with no major increase seen in adverse events necessitating discontinuation as the dose of GBP was titrated upward. Conclusions. This study indicates that patients with partial epilepsy may be effectively treated with GBP at dosages of ≤4,800 mg/day, without altering the safety profile of the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Examines a family with a novel disorder characterized by episodic muscle weakness and X-linked inheritance. Occurrence of severe muscle weakness; Linkage of the disorder to chromosome Xp22.3; Localization of the responsible gene to chromosome Xp22.3.