Search

Circulating proteomes provide a snapshot of the physiological state of a human organism responding to pathogenic challenges and drug interventions. The outcomes of patients with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome triggered by the SARS-CoV2 virus remain uncertain. Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 treatment that exerts encouraging clinical activity by controlling the cytokine storm and improving respiratory distress in patients with COVID-19. We investigate the biological determinants of therapeutic outcomes after tocilizumab treatment. Overall, 28 patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 who were treated with tocilizumab intravenously were included in this study. Sera were collected before and after tocilizumab, and the patient's outcome was evaluated until day 30 post-tocilizumab infusion for favorable therapeutic response to tocilizumab and mortality. Hyperreaction monitoring measurements by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis with data-independent acquisition quantified 510 proteins and 7019 peptides in the serum of patients. Alterations in the serum proteome reflect COVID-19 outcomes in patients treated with tocilizumab. Our results suggested that circulating proteins associated with the most significant prognostic impact belonged to the complement system, platelet degranulation, acute-phase proteins, and the Fc-epsilon receptor signaling pathway. Among these, upregulation of the complement system by activation of the classical pathway was associated with poor response to tocilizumab, and upregulation of Fc-epsilon receptor signaling was associated with lower mortality.

Purpose: Patients with advanced tumors enrolled in phase I trials display strong treatment expectations and few therapeutic alternatives. When oligoacquired resistance (OAR; ≤3 lesions of disease progression) occurs, local ablative stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) could allow disease control and continuing the experimental systemic treatment., Methods and Materials: Data from patients enrolled in phase I trials evaluating systemic treatments, who experienced OAR while on the phase I systemic therapy and subsequently received SRT between January 2014 and April 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS)1 (trial entry to OAR), PFS2 (SRT to first subsequent relapse), time to next systemic treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. First subsequent patterns of relapse after SRT were distinguished as OAR2, which could be locally rechallenged, or systemic acquired resistance (SAR; >3 lesions of disease progression). When available, correlations between molecular profile and pathway enrichments of OAR and SAR were explored., Results: Forty-two patients with 52 oligoprogressive lesions were analyzed. The median follow-up was 24 months. SRT allowed a median PFS2 of 7.1 months and a median TTNT of 12.8 months. PFS2 included 49% OAR2 and 51% SAR. Median time to first subsequent relapse (9.6 vs 3.5 months; P = .014) and TTNT (22.4 vs 7.6 months; P < .001) were longer for OAR2 compared with that for SAR. No severe toxicities were reported. A PFS1 of <6 months and de novo oligoprogressive lesions were associated with the presence of SAR. More diverse enriched gene pathways were observed for SAR compared with that for OAR2., Conclusions: In patients enrolled in phase I trials, OAR managed with SRT may increase time on investigational systemic treatments. Predictive factors reflecting tumor aggressiveness and clonal heterogeneity could help deciphering OAR2 from SAR and maximize SRT output in the oligoprogressive setting., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) offer a promising path for cancer therapy, leveraging the specificity of monoclonal antibodies and the cytotoxicity of linked drugs. The success of ADCs hinges on precise targeting of cancer cells based on protein expression levels. This review explores the relationship between target protein expression and ADC efficacy in solid tumours, focusing on results of clinical trials conducted between January 2019 and May 2023., Recent Findings: We hereby highlight approved ADCs, revealing their effectiveness even in low-expressing target populations. Assessing target expression poses challenges, owing to variations in scoring systems and biopsy types. Emerging methods, like digital image analysis, aim to standardize assessment. The complexity of ADC pharmacokinetics, tumour dynamics, and off-target effects emphasises the need for a balanced approach. This review underscores the importance of understanding target protein dynamics and promoting standardized evaluation methods in shaping the future of ADC-based cancer therapies., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

T-cell engagers (TCE) are cancer immunotherapies that have recently demonstrated meaningful benefit for patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The anticipated widespread use of T cell engagers poses implementation challenges and highlights the need for guidance to anticipate, mitigate, and manage adverse events. By mobilizing T-cells directly at the contact of tumor cells, TCE mount an obligatory and immediate anti-tumor immune response that could result in diverse reactions and adverse events. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is the most common reaction and is largely confined to the first drug administrations during step-up dosage. Cytokine release syndrome should be distinguished from infusion related reaction by clinical symptoms, timing to occurrence, pathophysiological aspects, and clinical management. Other common reactions and adverse events with TCE are immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), infections, tumor flare reaction and cytopenias. The toxicity profiles of TCE and CAR-T cells have commonalities and distinctions that we sum-up in this review. As compared with CAR-T cells, TCE are responsible for less frequently severe CRS or ICANS. This review recapitulates terminology, pathophysiology, severity grading system and management of reactions and adverse events related to TCE., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jean-Marie Michot (JMM) declare conflict of interest outside of the considered work, as being principal/sub-Investigator of clinical trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, BicycleTx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Casi Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Celgene Corporation, Cellcentric, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevarc, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Janssen R&D LLC, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Regeneron, Relay Therapeutics, Inc, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Transgene S.A, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. JMM declare conflict of interest outside of the considered work, research grants from Astex pharmaceuticals. JMM declare conflict of interest outside of the considered work, personal fees (fees paid for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speakers bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.) from: Ideogen, Glaxosmithkline, MSD, Therakos/Mallinckrodt, Regeneron. Thomas Hueso (TH) declare conflict of interest outside of the considered work, as being principal/sub-Investigator of clinical trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, BicycleTx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Casi Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Celgene Corporation, Cellcentric, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevarc, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Janssen R&D LLC, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Regeneron, Relay Therapeutics, Inc, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Transgene S.A, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. Arthur Geraud (AG) declare conflict of interest outside of the considered work, as being principal/sub-Investigator of clinical trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, BicycleTx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Casi Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Celgene Corporation, Cellcentric, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevarc, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Janssen R&D LLC, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Regeneron, Relay Therapeutics, Inc, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Transgene S.A, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A case series evaluating efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint blockade in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Background: Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs) whose management is based on expert opinion and may require the prescription of steroids and/or immunosuppressants (ISs). Recent data suggest that these treatments can reduce the effectiveness of ICBs., Objective: To investigate the relationship between the use of steroids and/or ISs and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) among ICB-treated patients with an irAE., Methods: We prospectively collected data from the medical records of patients with solid tumors or lymphoma in the French REISAMIC cohort and who had been treated with ICBs between June 2014 and June 2020., Results: 184 ICB-treated patients experienced at least one Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2 irAE. 107 (58.2%) were treated with steroids alone, 20 (10.9%) with steroids plus IS, 57 (31.0%) not received steroids or IS. The median OS was significantly shorter for patients treated with steroids alone (25.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 22.3-32.4] than for patients treated without steroids or IS (63 months [95%CI: 40.4-NA]) and those receiving an IS with steroids (53.4 months [95%CI: 47.3-NA]) (p < 0.001). The median PFS was significantly shorter for patients treated with steroids alone (17.0 months [95%CI: 11.7-22.9]) than for patients treated without steroids or IS (33.9 months [95%CI: 18.0-NA]) and those receiving an IS with steroids (41.1 months [95%CI: 26.2-NA]) (p = 0.006). There were no significant intergroup differences in the hospital admission and infection rates., Conclusion: In a prospective cohort of ICB-treated patients, the use of IS was not associated with worse OS or PFS, contrasting with the use of steroids for the management of irAEs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Chemotherapy associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors is currently the standard of care in several tumor indications. This combination approach improves progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and complete pathological response (pCR) in several cancer types both in the early and metastatic approaches. However, the distinct spectrum of toxicities between cytotoxic side effects and immune related adverse events (irAEs) with similar clinical presentations and different management strategies remains a challenge in daily practice for healthcare professionals. This review summarizes the most common toxicities reported in the randomized clinical trials that led to the subsequent FDA approval of these combinations, across tumor indications. We cite in particular: non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, triple negative breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, gastric carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma, cervical carcinoma and biliary tract carcinoma. We found that the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy was associated with an increased incidence of all grade adverse events (RR 1.11 [1.09; 1.12]) without an excess in treatment related mortality when compared to chemotherapy alone. We report also an increase in the incidence of serious adverse events (grade ≥ 3) (RR 1.16 [1.10;1.24]); in particular: high grade diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, rash and elevated liver enzymes. Together with the collaboration of our institutional network of organ specialists with expertise in irAEs, we propose practical recommendations for physicians to enhance clinical care and management of patients undergoing treatment with combined ICI immunotherapy and chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Patients with advanced cancer, previously treated with immune checkpoint blockade therapy, may retain residual treatment when undergoing the initial infusion of experimental monotherapy in phase 1 clinical trials. ANV419, an antibody-cytokine fusion protein, combines interleukin-2 (IL-2) with an anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody, aiming to stimulate the expansion of CD8 T and natural killer lymphocytes while restricting regulatory T lymphocytes. In the recent publication of the phase 1 dose escalation study of ANV419, a notable gap exists in detailed information regarding patients' prior antitumoral treatments, specifically programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) targeted monoclonal antibodies. Some patients likely retained residual anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies, potentially influencing the outcomes of ANV419. In a separate clinical cohort, we retrospectively measured the residual concentration of nivolumab and pembrolizumab, revealing persistent serum concentrations of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies even months after treatment cessation. This underscores the importance of comprehensively documenting prior immunotherapy details in clinical trials. Such information is crucial for understanding potential interactions that may impact both immunological and clinical effects., Competing Interests: Competing interests: LM, DC, JC, JD, SB have not conflict of interest to declare. KO, AM, SP, YL, SC and F-XD, as part of the Drug Development Department (DITEP): Principal/sub-investigator of Clinical Trials for AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Anaveon, Argen-X Bvba, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, BicycleTx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Clovis Oncology, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevac, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Medicament, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. Research Grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, INCA, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. Non-financial support (drug supplied) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boringher Ingelheim, GSK, Medimmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer, Roche., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Purpose: With liquid biopsy's widespread adoption in oncology, an increased number of clonal hematopoiesis-associated mutations (CHm) have been identified in patients with solid tumors. However, its impact on patient outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to analyze and describe CHm in a cohort of phase I patients., Methods: Retrospective data collection from medical records and molecular profiles (Foundation One Liquid CDx Assay) was performed before first study drug administration at the Drug Development Department of Gustave Roussy (France) within the STING trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04932525). CHm prevalence was assessed using any and ≥1% variant allele frequency (VAF) in epigenetic modifier genes ( DNMT3A , TET2 , and ASXL1 )., Results: From January 2021 to December 2022, 255 patients were enrolled in a phase I clinical trial. A total of 55% were male, with a median age of 62 years (24-86). Principal tumor locations were GI (27%) and genitourinary (21%). Overall, 104 patients (41%) had at least one CHm in liquid biopsy, with 55 patients (22%) having a VAF of ≥ 1%. The most frequent mutation was DNMT3A 73% at any VAF (n = 76) and 22% at 1% VAF (n = 23). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 3.8 months (m) for the CHm group versus 3.2 m for nonclonal hematopoiesis (CH; P = .08) and 18.26 m CHm versus 15.8 m non-CH ( P = .9), respectively. PFS increased in the CHm population treated with targeted therapy (hazard ratio, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.84]; P = .004)., Conclusion: CHm was commonly found in patients with solid tumors treated in phase I trials, with a prevalence of 41% in our cohort. The most frequently mutated gene was DNMT3A . The presence of CHm had no impact on the population of patients treated in the phase I trials.

Immunotherapy profoundly changed the landscape of cancer therapy by providing long-lasting responses in subsets of patients and is now the standard of care in several solid tumor types. However, immunotherapy activity beyond conventional immune checkpoint inhibition is plateauing, and biomarkers are overall lacking to guide treatment selection. Most studies have focused on T cell engagement and response, but there is a growing evidence that B cells may be key players in the establishment of an organized immune response, notably through tertiary lymphoid structures. Mechanisms of B cell response include antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis, promotion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell activation, maintenance of antitumor immune memory. In several solid tumor types, higher levels of B cells, specific B cell subpopulations, or the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures have been associated with improved outcomes on immune checkpoint inhibitors. The fate of B cell subpopulations may be widely influenced by the cytokine milieu, with versatile roles for B-specific cytokines B cell activating factor and B cell attracting chemokine-1/CXCL13, and a master regulatory role for IL-10. Roles of B cell-specific immune checkpoints such as TIM-1 are emerging and could represent potential therapeutic targets. Overall, the expanding field of B cells in solid tumors of holds promise for the improvement of current immunotherapy strategies and patient selection., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RF. Honoraria: Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, BMS, MSD, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck, Astra Zeneca. MT. NoneMR-C. NoneLC-A. NoneLR. NoneNN. Honoraria: Merck, PfizerJ-MJ. NoneLB. NoneMN. NoneBE. Honoraria: Bristol:Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Oncorena, Pfizer. Consulting or Advisory Role : AVEO, Bristol:Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Oncorena, Pfizer. Research Funding : BMS France (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses : Bristol:Myers Squibb, Ipsen, MSDLC. NoneLA. Consulting or Advisory Role: Astellas Pharma (Inst), Bristol:Myers Squibb (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Ipsen (Inst), Janssen (Inst), MSD (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Roche (Inst). Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS, Ipsen, MSDNC. Scientific grants from Sanofi, BMS, Cytune Pharma, Scientist advisory board from Servier, lectures for AstraZeneca., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

More than half of cancer cases occur in patients aged 65 years or older. The efficacy and safety of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients remains an unclear subject as available evidence is limited. Geriatric population is underrepresented in clinical trials. Consequently, most of our knowledge regarding innovative therapeutics was studied on a younger population. In this review of published literature, we report the available information on efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of FDA approved ADCs for hematologic malignancies and solid tumors in the geriatric population. We explore the results of clinical trials dedicated for older individuals as well as subgroup analyses of the geriatric population in major trials evaluating these drugs. Available data suggest a similar efficacy in older adults as compared to general population. However, older patients might be prone to a higher rate of adverse events in incidence with a potential impact on quality of life. We lack data to support primary dose reductions or schedule modifications in this category of patients. No pharmacokinetic differences were reported between age groups. It is crucial to encourage the development of clinical trials dedicated to older patients with geriatric parameters (G8 score, G-CODE…) so that results can be more representative of this population outside of clinical trials., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In addition to anti-PD(L)1, anti-CTLA-4 and anti-LAG-3, novel immune checkpoint proteins (ICP)-targeted antibodies have recently failed to demonstrate significant efficacy in clinical trials. In these trials, patients were enrolled without screening for drug target expression. Although these novel ICP-targeted antibodies were expected to stimulate anti-tumor CD8 + T-cells, the rationale for their target expression in human tumors relied on pre-clinical IHC stainings and transcriptomic data, which are poorly sensitive and specific techniques for assessing membrane protein expression on immune cell subsets. Our aim was to describe ICP expression on intratumoral T-cells from primary solid tumors to better design upcoming neoadjuvant cancer immunotherapy trials., Methods: We prospectively performed multiparameter flow cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) paired with TCR sequencing on freshly resected human primary tumors of various histological types to precisely determine ICP expression levels within T-cell subsets., Results: Within a given tumor type, we found high inter-individual variability for tumor infiltrating CD45 + cells and for T-cells subsets. The proportions of CD8 +  T-cells (~ 40%), CD4 +  FoxP3 - T-cells (~ 40%) and CD4 +  FoxP3 +  T-cells (~ 10%) were consistent across patients and indications. Intriguingly, both stimulatory (CD25, CD28, 4-1BB, ICOS, OX40) and inhibitory (PD-1, CTLA-4, PD-L1, CD39 and TIGIT) checkpoint proteins were predominantly co-expressed by intratumoral CD4 + FoxP3 + T-cells. ScRNA-Seq paired with TCR sequencing revealed that T-cells with high clonality and high ICP expressions comprised over 80% of FoxP3 + cells among CD4 + T-cells. Unsupervised clustering of flow cytometry and scRNAseq data identified subsets of CD8 +  T-cells and of CD4 +  FoxP3 - T-cells expressing certain checkpoints, though these expressions were generally lower than in CD4 +  FoxP3 +  T-cell subsets, both in terms of proportions among total T-cells and ICP expression levels., Conclusions: Tumor histology alone does not reveal the complete picture of the tumor immune contexture. In clinical trials, assumptions regarding target expression should rely on more sensitive and specific techniques than conventional IHC or transcriptomics. Flow cytometry and scRNAseq accurately characterize ICP expression within immune cell subsets. Much like in hematology, flow cytometry can better describe the immune contexture of solid tumors, offering the opportunity to guide patient treatment according to drug target expression rather than tumor histological type., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Circulating senescent CD8 + T (T 8 sen) cells are characterized by a lack of proliferative capacities but retain cytotoxic activity and have been associated to resistance to immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). We aimed to better characterize T 8 sen and to determine which factors were associated with their accumulation in patients with aNSCLC. Circulating T 8 sen cells were characterized by a higher expression of SA-βgal and the transcription factor T-bet, confirming their senescent status. Using whole virome profiling, cytomegalovirus (CMV) was the only virus associated with T 8 sen. CMV was necessary but not sufficient to explain high accumulation of T 8 sen (T 8 sen high status). In CMV + patients, the proportion of T 8 sen cells increased with cancer progression. Last, CMV-induced T 8 sen high phenotype but not CMV seropositivity itself was associated with worse progression-free and overall survival in patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy but not with chemotherapy. Overall, CMV is the unique viral driver of T 8 sen-driven resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies in patients with aNSCLC.

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) hepatitis, which does not improve with steroids and requires additional immunosuppressant, is defined as steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis. The outcome of patients with steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis remains poorly determined. Herein, we investigated the incidence, clinical features, and outcome of patients treated with second-line immunosuppressant for steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who presented ICI hepatitis from 1st June 2016 to 30th September 2022. Steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis was defined as no clinical and biological improvement after systemic steroid therapy ≥1 mg/kg/d. Main objectives were to assess the frequency and risk factors associated with steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis and to evaluate the efficacy of second-line immunosuppressants., Results: In total, 130 patients with grade ≥3 ICI hepatitis were screened, of them 60 (46.2%) were treated with systemic steroids. In total, 11/130 (8.5%) had steroid-refractory hepatitis. Statistically significant factors associated with steroid-refractory hepatitis included previous liver comorbidities (54.5% versus 11.6%; p < 0.01), hyperbilirubinemia (p < 0.001), and general symptoms (fever, jaundice, ascites, and/or encephalopathy) associated with hepatitis (72.7% versus 30.8%; p = 0.015). The 11 patients with steroid-refractory hepatitis were treated with mycophenolate mofetil. In total, resolution or return to grade ≤1 for hepatitis was observed in 81.8% (9/11) of patients., Conclusions: Steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis accounted for 8.5% of patients with grade ≥3 immune-related hepatitis and was statistically associated with previous liver comorbidities, hyperbilirubinemia, and general symptoms. Mycophenolate mofetil was a suitable option of therapy for steroid-refractory ICI hepatitis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Jean-Marie Michot reports outside of the submitted work, research funding as Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca AB, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare AG, BBB Technologies BV, Beigene, Bicycle Tx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Casi Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Celgene Corporation, Cellcentric, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Cullinan-Apollo, Curevarc, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Tharapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche AG, Imcheck Therapeutics, Incyte Corporation, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Iteos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Janssen R&D LLC, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Molecular Partners AG, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Genomics, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre Medicament, Relay Therapeutics, Inc, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Transgene SA, Turning Point Therapeutics, Xencor. Jean-Marie Michot reports research funding from BMS unrelated to the submitted work, honoraria from Gilead unrelated to the submitted work, honoraria from Ideogen unrelated to the submitted work. Capucine Baldini reports outside of the submitted work, research funding from BMS, honoraria from Sanofi, BMS, Astra Zeneca, and Abbvie. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are related to this study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: This review presents the rationale for intratumoral immunotherapy, technical considerations and safety. Clinical results from the latest trials are provided and discussed., Recent Findings: Intratumoral immunotherapy is feasible and safe in a wide range of cancer histologies and locations, including lung and liver. Studies mainly focused on multi-metastatic patients, with some positive trials such as T-VEC in melanoma, but evidence of clinical benefit is still lacking. Recent results showed improved outcomes in patients with a low tumor burden. Intratumoral immunotherapy can lower systemic toxicities and boost local and systemic immune responses. Several studies have proven the feasibility, repeatability, and safety of this approach, with some promising results in clinical trials. The clinical benefit might be improved in patients with a low tumor burden. Future clinical trials should focus on adequate timing of treatment delivery during the course of the disease, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Antibiotics (ABX) compromise the efficacy of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in cancer patients, but the mechanisms underlying their immunosuppressive effects remain unknown. By inducing the down-regulation of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1) in the ileum, post-ABX gut recolonization by Enterocloster species drove the emigration of enterotropic α4β7 + CD4 + regulatory T 17 cells into the tumor. These deleterious ABX effects were mimicked by oral gavage of Enterocloster species, by genetic deficiency, or by antibody-mediated neutralization of MAdCAM-1 and its receptor, α4β7 integrin. By contrast, fecal microbiota transplantation or interleukin-17A neutralization prevented ABX-induced immunosuppression. In independent lung, kidney, and bladder cancer patient cohorts, low serum levels of soluble MAdCAM-1 had a negative prognostic impact. Thus, the MAdCAM-1-α4β7 axis constitutes an actionable gut immune checkpoint in cancer immunosurveillance.

Cancer immunotherapy combinations have recently been shown to improve the overall survival of advanced mesotheliomas, especially for patients responding to those treatments. We aimed to characterize the biological correlates of malignant pleural mesotheliomas' primary resistance to immunotherapy and antiangiogenics by testing the combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, and nintedanib, a pan-antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in the multicenter PEMBIB trial (NCT02856425). Thirty patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma were treated and explored. Unexpectedly, we found that refractory patients were actively recruiting CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in their tumors through CXCL9 tumor release upon treatment. However, these patients displayed high levels of somatic copy-number alterations in their tumors that correlated with high blood and tumor levels of IL6 and CXCL8. Those proinflammatory cytokines resulted in higher tumor secretion of VEGF and tumor enrichment in regulatory T cells. Advanced mesothelioma should further benefit from stratified combination therapies adapted to their tumor biology., Significance: Sequential explorations of fresh tumor biopsies demonstrated that mesothelioma resistance to anti-PD-1 + antiangiogenics is not due to a lack of tumor T-cell infiltration but rather due to adaptive immunosuppressive pathways by tumors, involving molecules (e.g., IL6, CXCL8, VEGF, and CTLA4) that are amenable to targeted therapies. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 799., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: High-risk clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is frequently incidentally found in patients with solid tumors undergoing plasma cell-free DNA sequencing. Here, we aimed to determine if the incidental detection of high-risk CH by liquid biopsy may reveal occult hematologic malignancies in patients with solid tumors., Materials and Methods: Adult patients with advanced solid cancers enrolled in the Gustave Roussy Cancer Profiling study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04932525) underwent at least one liquid biopsy (FoundationOne Liquid CDx). Molecular reports were discussed within the Gustave Roussy Molecular Tumor Board (MTB). Potential CH alterations were observed, and patients referred to hematology consultation in the case of pathogenic mutations in JAK2 , MPL , or MYD88 , irrespective of the variant allele frequency (VAF), or in DNMT3A , TET2 , ASXL1 , IDH1 , IDH2 , SF3B1 , or U2AF1 with VAF ≥ 10%, while also considering patient cancer-related prognosis. TP53 mutations were discussed case-by-case., Results: Between March and October 2021, 1,416 patients were included. One hundred ten patients (7.7%) carried at least one high-risk CH mutation: DNMT3A (n = 32), JAK2 (n = 28), TET2 (n = 19), ASXL1 (n = 18), SF3B1 (n = 5), IDH1 (n = 4), IDH2 (n = 3), MPL (n = 3), and U2AF1 (n = 2). The MTB advised for hematologic consultation in 45 patients. Overall, 9 patients of 18 actually addressed had confirmed hematologic malignancies that were occult in six patients: two patients had myelodysplastic syndrome, two essential thrombocythemia, one a marginal lymphoma, and one a Waldenström macroglobulinemia. The other three patients were already followed up in hematology., Conclusion: The incidental findings of high-risk CH through liquid biopsy may trigger diagnostic hematologic tests and reveal an occult hematologic malignancy. Patients should have a multidisciplinary case-by-case evaluation.

Background: Generalised oedema was occasionally reported associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs). The purpose of this study is to investigate immune-related generalised oedema (ir-GE) drug related to ICPI, through frequency, clinical and pathological characteristics, and patient's outcome., Patients and Methods: Objectives of the study were to report on ir-GE associated with ICPI to define frequency, associated signs and symptoms, pathological characteristics, severity, and response to corticosteroids. To be included in the study, adult patients had to have ir-GE related to ICPI with certain or likely link, without any other known causes of generalised oedema. The study design was observational, over the period 2014-2020, from pharmacovigilance databases in France, including the prospective Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie (REISAMIC) registry. Calculation of the frequency of ir-GE was restricted to the prospective REISAMIC registry., Results: Over 6633 screened patients, 20 had ir-GE confirmed drug related to ICPI. Based on the prospective REISAMIC registry, the frequency of ir-GE was 0.19% of ICPI-treated patients (3 cases out of 1598 screened patients). The 20 patients with ir-GE had a median (range) age of 62 (26-81) years, most frequent tumour types were melanoma (n = 9; 45%) and lung cancer (n = 6; 30%). The most frequent localisations of oedema were peripheral (n = 17; 85%), pleural (n = 13; 65%), and peritoneal (n = 10; 50%). Polyserositis was observed in 11 (55%) patients. The median (range) weight gain per patient was 9 (2-30) kg. Associated signs and symptoms met criteria for capillary leak syndrome (n = 4; 20%), sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) (n = 3; 15%), or subcutaneous autoimmune syndrome (n = 2; 10%). Corticosteroids were administered to 15 patients; of them, 10 (67%) improved clinically after corticosteroids. Based on CTCAEV5.0, the highest severity of ir-GE was grade ≥4 in 11 (55%) patients and four (20%) patients died due to ir-GE., Conclusions: Generalised immune system-related oedema is a new category of adverse event with immune checkpoint inhibitors and is often associated with a life-threatening condition. The pathophysiology may in some cases be related to endothelial dysfunctions, such as SOS/VOD or capillary leak syndrome., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Biomarkers guiding the neoadjuvant use of immune-checkpoint blockers (ICB) are needed for patients with localized muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC). Profiling tumor and blood samples, we found that follicular helper CD4+ T cells (TFH) are among the best therapeutic targets of pembrolizumab correlating with progression-free survival. TFH were associated with tumoral CD8 and PD-L1 expression at baseline and the induction of tertiary lymphoid structures after pembrolizumab. Blood central memory TFH accumulated in tumors where they produce CXCL13, a chemokine found in the plasma of responders only. IgG4+CD38+ TFH residing in bladder tissues correlated with clinical benefit. Finally, TFH and IgG directed against urothelium-invasive Escherichia coli dictated clinical responses to pembrolizumab in three independent cohorts. The links between tumor infection and success of ICB immunomodulation should be prospectively assessed at a larger scale., Significance: In patients with bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, E. coli-specific CXCL13 producing TFH and IgG constitute biomarkers that predict clinical benefit. Beyond its role as a biomarker, such immune responses against E. coli might be harnessed for future therapeutic strategies. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2221., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the systemic approach to cancer treatment. Most patients receiving ICIs, however, do not derive benefits. Therefore, it is crucial to identify reliable predictive biomarkers of response to ICIs. One important pathway in regulating immune cell reactivity is L-arginine (ARG) metabolism, essential to T-cell activation. We therefore aimed to evaluate the association between baseline plasma ARG levels and the clinical benefit of ICIs., Patients and Methods: The correlation between ARG levels and clinical ICI activity was assessed by analyzing plasma samples obtained before treatment onset in two independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer included in two institutional molecular profiling programs (BIP, NCT02534649, n = 77; PREMIS, NCT03984318, n = 296) and from patients in a phase 1 first-in-human study of budigalimab monotherapy (NCT03000257). Additionally, the correlation between ARG levels and ICI efficacy in preclinical settings was evaluated using a syngeneic mouse model of colorectal cancer responsive to ICIs. Using matched peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) plasma samples, we analyzed the correlation between ARG levels and PBMC features through multiplexed flow cytometry analysis., Results: In both discovery and validation cohorts, low ARG levels at baseline (<42 μM) were significantly and independently associated with a worse clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Moreover, at the preclinical level, the tumor rejection rate was significantly higher in mice with high baseline ARG levels than in those with low ARG levels (85.7% versus 23.8%; P = 0.004). Finally, PBMC immunophenotyping showed that low ARG levels were significantly associated with increased programmed death-ligand 1 expression in several immune cell subsets from the myeloid lineage., Conclusions: We demonstrate that baseline ARG levels predict ICI response. Plasma ARG quantification may therefore represent an attractive biomarker to tailor novel therapeutic regimens targeting the ARG pathway in combination with ICIs., Competing Interests: Disclosure AB, JPG, DB, IN, LF: employees of Explicyte. AI received research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Chugai, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Pharmamar, Novartis, Roche, and received personal fees from Epizyme, Bayer, Lilly, Roche, and Springworks.e BB received grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Onxeo, BMS, Inivata, AbbVie, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Ignyta, Ipsen, Merck KGaA, MSD Oncology, Nektar, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Tiziana Therapeutics, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Oncology, OSE Immunotherapeutics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Servier, and Tolero Pharmaceuticals. JCS has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Astex, Clovis, GSK, GamaMabs, Lilly, MSD, Mission Therapeutics, Merus, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Symphogen, and Takeda. FB has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Astex, Clovis, GSK, GamaMabs, Lilly, MSD, Mission Therapeutics, Merus, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Symphogen, and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: Many intratumoural (IT) immunotherapies are currently developed in the clinic with the aim of overcoming primary and secondary resistance and/or to limit on-target/off-tumour toxicities of immune checkpoint targeted therapies. This study aimed to describe the feasibility, safety and efficacy of IT immunotherapy treatments., Design: This retrospective single-centre study included the first 100 consecutive patients enrolled in Gustave Roussy's Human IntraTumoral-ImmunoTherapy (HIT-IT) program. Patient characteristics, target description, image guidance, safety and response according to iRECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours for immunotherapy trials) were recorded. Predictive factors of complications and responses were analysed. Survival was also reported., Results: From 09/2015 to 05/2020, 100 patients had 115 tumours injected during 423 treatment cycles. Most frequent primary tumour arose from the skin (n = 49), digestive track (n = 4) or head and neck (n = 8). Injected tumours' mean diameter was 37 ± 23 mm, and a median number of 4 IT injections per patient (interquartile range:3-5) were performed. Targeted tumours for IT injections were superficial lymph nodes (36.5%), subcutaneous lesions (25.2%), liver tumours (20.9%) and others (17.4% including tumour sites such as deep lymph nodes or lung). Most patients (72%) received systemic immunotherapy in combination with HIT-IT. Procedure- and drug-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 11.3% and 33.3% of the treatment cycles, respectively. Only 3 procedure-related AEs were grade-3 (0.7%); and no grade-4 or 5 occurred. Among all cycles, 7 grade-3 and 1 grade-5 drug-related AEs were reported. Complete and partial responses were achieved for 5% and 18% of patients, respectively, while stable disease was the best response for 11%. Patients receiving HIT-IT as a 1st-line treatment (24%), or not previously pre-treated with immunotherapy (53%) responded better, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively. From 1st cycle of IT, 12-month overall progression-free survival and overall survival were 21% (14-31%) and 57% (47-68%), respectively., Conclusions: This retrospective study, conducted on patients with cancer and treated within clinical trials at Gustave Roussy, demonstrates the feasibility and safety of the IT immunotherapy strategy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Lambros Tselikas received honoraria from the following companies: Amgen, Boston Scientific, Medincell, GE Healthcare, Guerbet, SIRTEX, Quantum Surgical, and received grants from BMS foundation and Terumo. Thierry de Baere, has consulted or received advisory fees from: AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Eisai, GE Healthcare, Guerbet, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Nanobiotix, Roche, Terumo, Quantum surgical, Frédéric Deschamps, has received honoraria from: Ablatech, Boston Scientific, General Electric, Medtronic and Terumo. Capucine Baldini, reports research funding from BMS, honoraria from Sanofi, BMS, Astra Zeneca, and Abbvie Jean-Charles Soria, received honoraria from Astex, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blend Therapeutics, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Clovis, Eli Lily, Gammamabs, Merus, Mission Therapeutics, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Symhogen, Tarveda; is a Gritstone stockholder and was an AstraZeneca full time employee from Sept 2017 to Dec 2019 and is an AMGEN full time employee since July 2021. Fabrice Barlesi, reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer–Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer and Takeda. Christophe Massard, has consulted or received advisory fees from: Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Debiopharm, Genentech, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Orion. Caroline Robert, has consulted for BMS, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Amgen, Merck, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, Biothera, Ultimovacs. Stéphane Champiat, has received honoraria or consulted for the following companies: Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, MSD, Novartis and Roche. Aurélien Marabelle, has participated to Scientific Advisory Boards or Consulted for the following companies: MSD, Astra Zeneca/Medimmune, Bayer, Pillar Partners, Bioncotech, Rigontec, Curevac, Servier, Amgen. Antoine Dardenne, , Matthieu Faron, , Samy Ammari, Siham Farhane, Steve Suzzoni, François-Xavier Danlos, Thibault Raoult, Sandrine Susini, Nael Al-Shatti, Severine Mouraud, Adrian Kobe, Alexandre Delpla, Charles Roux, have no conflict of interest to declare •No specific funding was obtained for this study. The Intratumoral programm of Gustave Roussy is partially funded by the Centre d’Investigation Clinique BIOTHERIS (CIC1428 INSERM), (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acetaminophen (APAP) use has been associated with blunted vaccine immune responses. This study aimed to assess APAP impact on immunotherapy efficacy in patients with cancer., Patients and Methods: Exposure to APAP was assessed by plasma analysis and was correlated with clinical outcome in three independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer who were treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). The immunomodulatory effects of APAP were evaluated on a preclinical tumor model and on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors., Results: Detectable plasma APAP levels at treatment onset were associated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in ICB-treated cancer patients, independently of other prognostic factors. APAP significantly reduced ICB efficacy in the preclinical MC38 model, as well as the production of PD-1 blockade-related interferon-γ secretion by human PBMCs. Moreover, reduction of ICB efficacy in vivo was associated with significantly increased tumor infiltration by regulatory T cells (Tregs). Administration of APAP over 24 h induced a significant expansion of peripheral Tregs in healthy individuals. In addition, interleukin-10, a crucial mediator of Treg-induced immune suppression, was significantly up-regulated upon treatment with ICB in cancer patients taking APAP., Conclusions: This study provides strong preclinical and clinical evidence of the role of APAP as a potential suppressor of antitumor immunity. Hence, APAP should be used with caution in patients treated with ICB., Competing Interests: Disclosure AI reports a consulting or advisory role with AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai, Deciphera, Merck, Parthenon, Roche, Springworks; and grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pharmamar, Roche. AB, AC, CR, IN, and JPG are employees of Explicyte. JCS is currently an employee of Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Interventional radiology techniques provide excellent local tumor control for small tumors in various organs, but several limitations can hamper the oncological outcomes such as the tumor size or the number of lesions. Technical improvements, optimal patient selection and combination with systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been successfully developed to overcome these barriers.In this setting, chemotherapy and targeted therapies aim to diminish the tumor burden in addition to local treatments, while immunotherapies may have a synergistic effect in terms of mechanism of action on the tumor cell as well as the immune environment, with multiple treatment combinations being available. Finally, interventional Rrdiology treatments often increase tumor antigen exposure to the immune system, and thus stimulate a specific antitumor immune response that can act beyond the treated site. Notwithstanding their many benefits, combination treatment may also result in complications, the most feared may be auto-immune-related adverse events.In early studies, several combined therapies have shown promising levels of safety and efficacy, particularly in hepatocellular carcinoma.This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of results of combined therapies for primary and secondary liver malignancies. Recent advances and future perspectives will be discussed.

Introduction: Immunosenescence is a progressive remodeling of immune functions associated with a decreased ability of the immune system to set up an efficient immune response, both innate and adaptive, with an increase of highly differentiated T cells at the expense of naive T cells. The incidence and prevalence of most cancers increase with age, which can partly be explained by tumor escape mechanisms and decreased immunosurveillance. Aging is also associated with inflammaging, a low-grade proinflammatory state characterized by an increase in inflammatory mediators. Anti-cancer immunotherapy has profoundly changed the landscape of oncology therapy in the last 10 years. Modern T-cell targeted therapies such as bispecific T cell engagers, CAR-T cells, or immune checkpoint blockers may be theoretically affected by immunosenescence or inflammaging., Areas Covered: A bibliographic review through PubMed and Embase was carried out using the following search terms: 'immunosenescence,' 'immunotherapy,' 'inflammaging,' 'bispecific antibodies,' 'CAR-T cells,' 'immune checkpoint blockers,' and 'older patients.', Expert Opinion: This review explores the potential impact of immunosenescence and inflammaging on anti-cancer immunotherapy and therapeutic strategies that could counter immune senescence. A more dedicated research on immunosenescence biomarkers in future clinical trials is warranted for the development of new, more effective and safer therapies.

Background: We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of nintedanib, an oral anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in combination with pembrolizumab, an anti-PD1 immunotherapy, in patients with advanced solid tumors (PEMBIB trial; NCT02856425)., Methods: In this monocentric phase Ib dose escalation cohort, we evaluated escalating doses of nintedanib (Dose level 1 (DL1) = 150 mg bid [bis in die, as twice a day]; DL2 = 200 mg bid, oral delivery) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W, IV). Patients received a 1-week lead-in dose of nintedanib monotherapy prior starting pembrolizumab. The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination based on dose limiting toxicity (DLT) occurrence during the first 4 weeks. Secondary objectives were to assess the anti-tumor efficacy and to identify the associated immune and angiogenic parameters in order to establish the recommended nintedanib dose for expansion cohorts. Flow cytometry (FC), Immuno-Histo-Chemistry (IHC) and electrochemiluminescence multi-arrays were prospectively performed on baseline & on-treatment tumor and blood samples to identify immune correlates of efficacy., Results: A total of 12/13 patients enrolled were evaluable for DLT (1 patient withdrew consent prior receiving pembrolizumab). Three patients at 200 mg bid experienced a DLT (grade 3 liver enzymes increase). Four patients developed grade 1-2 immune related adverse events (irAE). Eight patients died because of cancer progression. Median follow-up was 23.7 months (95%CI: 5.55-40.5). Three patients developed a partial response (PR) (ORR = 25%) and five patients (42%) had durable clinical benefit (DCB), defined as PR or stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months. At baseline, patients with DCB had higher plasma levels of Tie2, CXCL10, CCL22 and circulating CD4 + PD1 + OX40 + T cells than patients without DCB. Patients with DCB presented also with more DC-LAMP + dendritic cells, CD3 + T cells and FOXP3 + Tregs in baseline tumor biopsies. For DCB patients, the nintedanib lead-in monotherapy resulted in higher blood CCL3, Tregs and CCR4 + CXCR3 + CXCR5 - memory CD4 T cells. After the first pembrolizumab infusion, patients with DCB showed lower IL-6, IL-8, IL-27 plasma levels., Conclusion: Nintedanib 150 mg bid is the recommended dose for combination with pembrolizumab and is currently investigated in multiple expansion cohorts. Early tumoral and circulating immune factors were associated with cancer outcome under nintedanib & pembrolizumab therapy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02856425 . Registered August 4, 2016 - Prospectively registered., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Patients with high-risk, nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) frequently relapse after standard intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy and may have a dismal outcome. The mechanisms of resistance to such immunotherapy remain poorly understood. Here, using cancer cell lines, freshly resected human bladder tumors, and samples from cohorts of patients with bladder cancer before and after BCG therapy, we demonstrate 2 distinct patterns of immune subversion upon BCG relapse. In the first pattern, intracellular BCG infection of cancer cells induced a posttranscriptional downregulation of HLA-I membrane expression via inhibition of autophagy flux. Patients with HLA-I-deficient cancer cells following BCG therapy had a myeloid immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics and dismal outcomes. Conversely, patients with HLA-I-proficient cancer cells after BCG therapy presented with CD8+ T cell tumor infiltrates, upregulation of inflammatory cytokines, and immune checkpoint-inhibitory molecules. The latter patients had a very favorable outcome. We surmise that HLA-I expression in bladder cancers at relapse following BCG does not result from immunoediting but rather from an immune subversion process directly induced by BCG on cancer cells, which predicts a dismal prognosis. HLA-I scoring of cancer cells by IHC staining can be easily implemented by pathologists in routine practice to stratify future treatment strategies for patients with urothelial cancer.

Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) relies on the in-depth understanding of protective immune responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). We characterized the polarity and specificity of memory T cells directed against SARS-CoV-2 viral lysates and peptides to determine correlates with spontaneous, virus-elicited, or vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 in disease-free and cancer-bearing individuals. A disbalance between type 1 and 2 cytokine release was associated with high susceptibility to COVID-19. Individuals susceptible to infection exhibited a specific deficit in the T helper 1/T cytotoxic 1 (Th1/Tc1) peptide repertoire affecting the receptor binding domain of the spike protein (S1-RBD), a hotspot of viral mutations. Current vaccines triggered Th1/Tc1 responses in only a fraction of all subject categories, more effectively against the original sequence of S1-RBD than that from viral variants. We speculate that the next generation of vaccines should elicit Th1/Tc1 T-cell responses against the S1-RBD domain of emerging viral variants., Significance: This study prospectively analyzed virus-specific T-cell correlates of protection against COVID-19 in healthy and cancer-bearing individuals. A disbalance between Th1/Th2 recall responses conferred susceptibility to COVID-19 in both populations, coinciding with selective defects in Th1 recognition of the receptor binding domain of spike. See related commentary by McGary and Vardhana, p. 892. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 873., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Objectives: GCA is a large vessel vasculitis for which triggering factors remain unknown. Clonal haematopoiesis (CH) was associated with atherosclerosis through the induction of inflammation in myeloid cells, and data suggest that CH expansion and inflammation may support each other to induce a pro-inflammatory loop. Our objective was to describe the impact of JAK2p.V617F-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) on GCA and to screen MPN-free patients for CH mutations., Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study comparing the characteristics of 21 GCA patients with MPN and 42 age- and gender-matched GCA patients without MPN. Also, 18 GCA patients were screened for CH through next-generation sequencing (NGS)., Results: The most frequent associated MPN was essential thrombocythaemia (ET; n = 11). Compared with controls, GCA patients with MPN had less-frequent cephalic symptoms (71.4 vs 97.6%; P = 0.004) and higher platelet counts at baseline [485 × 109/l (interquartile range 346-586) vs 346 (296-418); P = 0.02]. There was no difference between groups for other clinical features. Overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with MPN compared with controls [hazard ratio 8.2 (95% CI 1.2, 56.6); P = 0.03]. Finally, screening for CH using NGS in 15 GCA patients without MPN revealed CH in 33%., Conclusion: GCA patients with MPN display higher platelet counts and shorter overall survival than controls. This association is not fortuitous, given the possible pathophysiological relationship between the two diseases. CH was found in one-third of GCA patients, which may be higher than the expected prevalence for a similar age, and should be confirmed in a larger cohort., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) expression has been associated with activation and exhaustion of both the CD4 and CD8 populations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Nevertheless, the impact of the balance between circulating CD8 + PD-1 + and CD4 + PD-1 + in patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) is unknown., Methods: The CD8 + PD-1 + to CD4 + PD-1 + ratio (PD-1-Expressing Ratio on Lymphocytes in a Systemic blood sample, or 'PERLS') was determined by cytometry in fresh whole blood from patients with aNSCLC before treatment with single-agent ICB targeting PD-1 or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1 (discovery cohort). A PERLS cut-off was identified by log-rank maximization. Patients treated with ICB (validation cohort) or polychemotherapy (control cohort) were classified as PERLS+/- (above/below cut-off). Circulating immune cell phenotype and function were correlated with PERLS. A composite score (good, intermediate and poor) was determined using the combination of PERLS and senescent immune phenotype as previously described in aNSCLC., Results: In the discovery cohort (N=75), the PERLS cut-off was 1.91, and 11% of patients were PERLS+. PERLS + correlated significantly with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.63 months (95% CI 7.82 to not reached (NR)) versus 2.69 months (95% CI 1.81 to 5.52; p=0.03). In an independent validation cohort (N=36), median PFS was NR (95% CI 7.9 to NR) versus 2.00 months (95% CI 1.3 to 4.5; p=0.04) for PERLS + and PERLS-, respectively; overall survival (OS) followed a similar but non-significant trend. In the pooled cohort (N=111), PERLS + correlated significantly with PFS and OS. PERLS did not correlate with outcome in the polychemotherapy cohort. PERLS did not correlate with clinical characteristics but was significantly associated with baseline circulating naïve CD4 + T cells and the increase of memory T cells post-ICB treatment. Accumulation of memory T cells during treatment was linked to CD4 + T cell polyfunctionality. The composite score was evaluated in the pooled cohort (N=68). The median OS for good, intermediate and poor composite scores was NR (95% CI NR to NR), 8.54 months (95% CI 4.96 to NR) and 2.42 months (95% CI 1.97 to 15.5; p=0.001), respectively. The median PFS was 12.60 months (95% CI 9.63 to NR), 2.58 months (95% CI 1.74 to 7.29) and 1.76 months (95% CI 1.31 to 4.57; p<0.0001), respectively., Conclusions: Elevated PERLS, determined from a blood sample before immunotherapy, was correlated with benefit from PD-(L)1 blockers in aNSCLC., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BD: speakers bureaus or educational events from Roche, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Amgen, Lilly; support for attending meetings and/or travel from AZ, Pfizer, Oxyvie. MN: no competing interest to declare, EA: support for attending meetings and/or travel from: Mundipharma; lectures and educational activities: Sanofi Genzymes. RF: senior advisory board meetings for MSD. LC, J-MJ, LB, JG, AD, F-XD: no competing interest to declare. LM: sponsored research: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Stilla, Inivata. Consulting, advisory role: Roche Diagnostics, Takeda, Roche. Lectures and educational activities: Bristol Myers Squibb, Tecnofarma, Roche, Takeda. Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche. Mentorship program with key opinion leaders: funded by AstraZeneca. CC: no competing interest to declare. AM: senior advisory board meetings for MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Sanofi, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Merck Serono. Consulting services to Sanofi, Roche/Genentech. Speakers bureau of MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca/Medimmune, Sanofi, Roche/Genentech, Merck Serono. BB: sponsored research at Gustave Roussy Cancer Center 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Inivata, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals. NC: sponsored research at Gustave Roussy Cancer Center from AstraZeneca, GSK, Roche, Sanofi, Cytune Pharma, Gilead, Servier., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, such as systemic sclerosis (SSc), are excluded from clinical trials, so the data on tolerability and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients are limited. This study investigated the tolerability and efficacy of anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD (L)1) immunotherapies in patients with pre-existing SSc., Methods: Scleronco-01 was a multicentre, nationwide, open-label, phase IV observational study, from 2019 to 2021., Results: Seventeen SSc patients receiving treatment for lung carcinoma (n = 13, 77%), head and neck cancer (n = 2, 12%), melanoma (n = 1, 6%), and colorectal carcinoma (n = 1, 6%) were included. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 60 (34-82) years. Fifteen (88%) patients received anti-PD1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and two (12%) anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab). The median follow-up duration was 12 (range, 2-38) months. Four patients (24%) experienced flare-up of SSc symptoms. Ten patients (59%) developed an immune-related adverse event (grade I-II in 11 patients [65%], grade III-IV in one [6%]) without grade V. The overall response rate was 41% (7/17 patients). The median overall survival was 15.8 (95% confidence interval: 7.3 to not reached) months., Conclusion: Anti-PD1 or PD-L1 immunotherapies are suitable options for cancer patients with pre-existing SSc. Longer follow-up periods are required for long-term safety analyses., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) are now widely used in oncology. Most patients, however, do not derive benefit from these agents. Therefore, there is a crucial need to identify novel and reliable biomarkers of resistance to such treatments in order to prescribe potentially toxic and costly treatments only to patients with expected therapeutic benefits. In the wake of genomics, the study of proteins is now emerging as the new frontier for understanding real-time human biology., Patients and Methods: We analyzed the proteome of plasma samples, collected before treatment onset, from two independent prospective cohorts of cancer patients treated with ICB (discovery cohort n = 95, validation cohort n = 292). We then investigated the correlation between protein plasma levels, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival and overall survival by Cox proportional hazards models., Results: By using an unbiased proteomics approach, we show that, in both discovery and validation cohorts, elevated baseline serum level of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is associated with a poor clinical outcome in cancer patients treated with ICB, independently of other prognostic factors. We also demonstrated that the circulating level of LIF is inversely correlated with the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures in the tumor microenvironment., Conclusion: This novel clinical dataset brings strong evidence for the role of LIF as a potential suppressor of antitumor immunity and suggests that targeting LIF or its pathway may represent a promising approach to improve efficacy of cancer immunotherapy in combination with ICB., Competing Interests: Disclosure AB, JPG: Employees of Explicyte. AI: Received research grants from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Chugai, Merck, MSD, Pharmamar, Novartis, Roche, and received personal fees from Epizyme, Bayer, Lilly, Roche, and Springworks. BB: Received grants from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Onxeo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inivata, Abbvie, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Ignyta, Ipsen, Merck KGaA, MSD Oncology, Nektar, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Tiziana Therapeutics, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen Oncology, OSE Immunotherapeutics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, SERVIER, Tolero Pharmaceuticals. YL: Received grants and personal fees from Janssen, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and non-financial support from Astellas, grants and personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, personal fees and non-financial support from BMS, personal fees from Clovis, personal fees and non-financial support from Seattle Genetics, personal fees from Incyte, personal fees from Pfizer. AM: Received research grants from Mersu, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Transgene, MSD and received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Oncovir, Merieux. JCS: Has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Astex, Clovis, GSK, GamaMabs, Lilly, MSD, Mission Therapeutics, Merus, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Servier, Symphogen, and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Data sharing Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article will be available after deidentification beginning 24 months and ending 48 months following article publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Requests should be sent to the corresponding author., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain generally unpredictable, and severe irAEs remain challenging to detect early and manage. Very severe (grade IV-V) irAEs have not been extensively characterised in prospective studies, and their predictive factors remain unknown., Objective: The objective of the study was to describe and identify predictive factors of very severe (grade IV-V) irAEs., Design: The French Registre des Effets Indésirables Sévères des Anticorps Monoclonaux Immunomodulateurs en Cancérologie (REISAMIC) registry has prospectively collected all clinically significant irAEs occurring in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at Gustave Roussy Institute since 2014., Setting: This was a single-centre prospective cohort study at the Gustave Roussy Institute cancer centre (Villejuif, France)., Participants: The participants were all adult patients with a solid or haematological cancer treated with an anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or an anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and who presented a clinically significant irAE., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes included the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with very severe irAEs, including tumour type, affected organs, time to irAE occurrence, blood cell count and serum biochemistry parameters., Results: Of the 1187 patients prospectively followed in REISAMIC between December 2014 and January 2020, 380 (32.0%) had at least one irAE, and 34 (2.86%) presented with very severe irAEs (grades IV-V). Among the 380 patients with an irAE, the distribution of very severe irAEs (grades IV-V) was 8.95% and death (grade V) was 3.95%. Among the 34 patients with very severe irAEs, 33 were treated with monotherapy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, and one patient was treated with a combination of PD-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 inhibitors. The median time to occurrence was shorter for very severe irAEs (median [interquartile range]: 41 days [0-634] for grades IV-V; versus 91 days [0-1123] for grades I-III; p = 0.01680). On initiation of immunotherapy, the predictive factors for very severe irAEs were performance status ≥2, elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and treatment for lung cancer., Conclusions: Very severe (grade IV-V) immunological toxicities occurred earlier than mild severe toxicities. On initiation of immunotherapy, patients with poor performance status, elevated neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and lung cancer are identified at risk of developing these very severe toxicities. These results could help to develop risk scores to identify patients at risk of developing severe toxicities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement V.R., V.G., A.L., S.M., F-X.D., A-L.V. and S.L. have no conflicts of interest to declare. P.M-R. reports personal payment from Abilitypharma and Roche. S.C. is the principal investigator of clinical trials for Amgen, Merck and Sanofi Aventis, reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Janssen, Merck, MSD, Novartis and Roche, reports support for attending meetings and/or travel from AstraZeneca, MSD and Roche, reports participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board in Amgen, AstraZeneca and Oncovita, reports as part of the Drug Development Department (DITEP) the role of the principal/sub-investigator of clinical trials for AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Adlai Nortye USA Inc, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, BeiGene, BicycleTx Ltd, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Clovis Oncology, Cullinan-Apollo, CureVac, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Therapeutics, GamaMabs, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, iTeos Belgium SA, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, MedImmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Medicament, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, SOTIO A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Turning Point Therapeutics and Xencor, reports research grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, INCA, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi and reports non-financial support (drug supplied) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boringher Ingelheim, GSK, MedImmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer and Roche. C.B. reports grants or contracts from any entity made to the institution from BMS and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from BMS and Astra Zeneca. C.M. reports consultant/advisory fees from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, BMS, Celgene, Debiopharm, Genentech, Ipsen, Janssen, Lilly, MedImmune, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Orion and the role of the principal/sub-investigator of clinical trials for AbbVie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, BeiGene, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, GamaMabs, Genentech, Gortec, GSK, H3 Biomedicine, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, MedImmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro and Xencor. A.M. reports the role of the principal investigator of clinical trials for the following companies: Roche/Genentech, BMS, Merck (MSD), Pfizer, Lytix pharma, Eisai, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Tesaro, Chugai, OSE immunotherapeutics, SOTIO, Molecular Partners, IMCheck, Pierre Fabre and Adlai Nortye; is a member of Clinical Trial Steering Committee: NCT02528357 (GSK) and NCT03334617 (AZ); is a member of Data Safety and Monitoring Board: NCT02423863 (Sponsor: Oncovir); is a member of scientific advisory boards in the following companies: Merck Serono, eTheRNA, Lytix pharma, Kyowa Kirin Pharma, Novartis, BMS, Symphogen, Genmab, Amgen, Biothera, Nektar, Tesaro/GSK, OncoSec, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Servier, Gritstone, Molecular Partners, Bayer, Partner Therapeutics, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre, RedX pharma, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Medicxi, HiFiBio, IMCheck, MSD, iTeos, Innate Pharma, Shattuck Labs, MedinCell, Tessa Therapeutics and Deka Biosciences; reports teaching/speaker activities in the following companies: Roche/Genentech, BMS, Merck (MSD), Merck Serono, Astra Zeneca/MedImmune, Amgen, Sanofi and Servier; reports the scientific and medical consulting in Roche, Pierre Fabre, Onxeo, EISAI, Bayer, Genticel, Rigontec, Daiichi Sankyo, Imaxio, Sanofi/BioNTech, Molecular Partners, Pillar Partners, BPI, Faron and Applied Materials; reports non-financial support (travel expenses) from Astra Zeneca, BMS, Merck (MSD) and Roche; is a shareholder in Pegascy SAS, Centessa Pharmaceuticals, HiFiBio and Shattuck Labs; is a patent holder, patent issued (not licenced): ‘Humanized and Chimeric Monoclonal Antibodies to CD81’, Stanford Office of Technology Licensing, 3000 El Camino Real, Bldg. 5, Suite 300, Palo Alto, CA 94306-2100. U.S. Application Serial No. 62/351,054; reports pre-clinical and clinical research grants (institutional funding) from Merus, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Transgene, Fondation MSD Avenir and Sanofi and reports the following institutional links: As part of the Drug Development Department (DITEP) from Gustave Roussy, the role of the sub-investigator of clinical trials sponsored by the following companies: AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Arno Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Clovis Oncology, Cullinan-Apollo, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Forma Therapeutics, GamaMabs, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, MedImmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Medicament, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, SOTIO A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro and Xencor; research grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi and non-financial support (drug supply to Gustave Roussy sponsored trials) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MedImmune, MSD, NH TherAGuiX, Pfizer and Roche. O.L. reports consulting fees from BMS, MSD and AstraZeneca; payment for expert testimony form BMS, MSD, AstraZeneca and Incyte and support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS. J-M.M. reports consulting fees from Pfizer, AstraZeneca and BMS., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Sarcoid-like granulomatosis (SLG) reaction caused by immunotherapy remains poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the outcome of patients with cancer and SLG associated with immunotherapy., Patients and Methods: Between April 2016 and June 2020, 434 patients with immunological adverse events were screened from the ImmunoTOX assessment board of Gustave Roussy, an academic cancer centre in France. Among them, 28 patients had SLG associated with immunotherapy (SLG cohort) and 406 patients had other immunological adverse events (control cohort). Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients were compared from SLG and control cohort., Results: The SLG cohort consisted of 28 patients, 14 women and 14 men, with the median (range) age of 56.5 (28.7-75.3) years. Patients in the SLG cohort with sarcoidosis were asymptomatic (only radiographical finding) in 13 (46.4%) cases; otherwise, the most frequent symptoms were dyspnoea in 8 (28.6%) patients and cough in 5 (17.8%) patients. The computerised tomography scan found sarcoidosis localisations in mediastinal or peri-hilar thoracic lymph nodes in 26 (92.9%) patients, and lung parenchymal involvement was found in 14 (50.0%) patients. The radiographic Scadding stages for sarcoidosis classification were distributed in stages 0, I, II, III and IV in 2 patients (7.1%), 13 patients (46.4%), 11 patients (39.3%), 1 patient (3.6%) and 1 patient (3.6%), respectively. Compared with patients with other immunological toxicities (cohort control), patients with sarcoidosis presented most frequently with melanoma (75.0% versus 21.9% of patients; p < 0.001) and more often received combined therapies of anti-programmed cell death 1 plus anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 protein (46.4% versus 12.6% of patients; p = 0.002). Patients with sarcoidosis had an improved overall survival (OS); the median OS was not reached in the SLG cohort and 40.4 months in the control cohort, hazard ratio = 0.232 (95% confidence interval: 0.086-0.630) (p = 0.002)., Conclusion: Sarcoidosis-like reactions in patients receiving immunotherapy were reported as non-severe immunological reactions in most cases and were correlated with improved OS. SLG should not be misdiagnosed as tumour progression in patients receiving immunotherapy treatment for cancer., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement O.L. has received expert testimony and consultancy fees from BMS France, MSD and AstraZeneca, consultancy fees from Genzyme and expert testimony fees from Janssen. J-M.M. is a principal/sub-investigator of clinical trials for AbbVie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, GamaMabs, Genentech, Gortec, GSK, H3 Biomedecine, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, MedImmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro and Xencor. A.M. is a principal/sub-investigator of clinical trials for AbbVie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, Gamamabs, Genentech, Gortec, GSK, H3 Biomedecine, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, MedImmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro and Xencor. He reports personal fees (monies paid to you for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speaker bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.) from MedImmune, Pfizer, Servier, AstraZeneca and Janssen Bristol Myers Squibb. B.B. reports sponsored Research at Gustave Roussy Cancer Centre, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cristal Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Ignyta, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Nektar, Onxeo, OSE Immunopharmaceutics, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Takeda and Tiziana Pharma. C.P. reports hosting fees from Chugai, Sandoz and Amgen. E.R. reports consultancy fees and/or conference fees unrelated to the topic from BMS France, Novartis and Roche and reports grants from BMS, Novartis, Roche, Merck Serono, MSD, Idera, Iovance, Regeneron and Debiopharm outside the submitted work. All the other authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Cancer patients are particularly susceptible to the development of severe Covid-19, prompting us to investigate the serum metabolome of 204 cancer patients enrolled in the ONCOVID trial. We previously described that the immunosuppressive tryptophan/kynurenine metabolite anthranilic acid correlates with poor prognosis in non-cancer patients. In cancer patients, we observed an elevation of anthranilic acid at baseline (without Covid-19 diagnosis) and no further increase with mild or severe Covid-19. We found that, in cancer patients, Covid-19 severity was associated with the depletion of two bacterial metabolites, indole-3-proprionate and 3-phenylproprionate, that both positively correlated with the levels of several inflammatory cytokines. Most importantly, we observed that the levels of acetylated polyamines (in particular N 1 -acetylspermidine, N 1 ,N 8 -diacetylspermidine and N 1 ,N 12 -diacetylspermine), alone or in aggregate, were elevated in severe Covid-19 cancer patients requiring hospitalization as compared to uninfected cancer patients or cancer patients with mild Covid-19. N 1 -acetylspermidine and N 1 ,N 8 -diacetylspermidine were also increased in patients exhibiting prolonged viral shedding (>40 days). An abundant literature indicates that such acetylated polyamines increase in the serum from patients with cancer, cardiovascular disease or neurodegeneration, associated with poor prognosis. Our present work supports the contention that acetylated polyamines are associated with severe Covid-19, both in the general population and in patients with malignant disease. Severe Covid-19 is characterized by a specific metabolomic signature suggestive of the overactivation of spermine/spermidine N 1 -acetyl transferase-1 (SAT1), which catalyzes the first step of polyamine catabolism.

In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic led to an unprecedented destabilization of the world's health and economic systems. The rapid spread and life-threatening consequences of COVID-19 have imposed testing of repurposed drugs, by investigating interventions already used in other indications, including anticancer drugs. The contours of anticancer drug repurposing have been shaped by similarities between the pathogenesis of COVID-19 and malignancies, including abnormal inflammatory and immunologic responses. In this review, we discuss the salient positive and negative points of repurposing anticancer drugs to advance treatments for COVID-19. SIGNIFICANCE: Targeting anti-inflammatory pathways with JAK/STAT inhibitors or anticytokine therapies aiming to curb COVID-19-related cytokine storm, using antiangiogenic drugs to reduce vascular abnormalities or immune-checkpoint inhibitors to improve antiviral defenses, could be of value in COVID-19. However, conflicting data on drug efficacy point to the need for better patient selection and biomarker studies., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

The rising interest for precise characterization of the tumour immune contexture has recently brought forward the high potential of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in identifying molecular mechanisms engaged in the response to immunotherapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the major principles of single-cell and conventional (bulk) RNA-seq applied to onco-immunology. We describe standard preprocessing and statistical analyses of data obtained from such techniques and highlight some computational challenges relative to the sequencing of individual cells. We notably provide examples of gene expression analyses such as differential expression analysis, dimensionality reduction, clustering and enrichment analysis. Additionally, we used public data sets to exemplify how deconvolution algorithms can identify and quantify multiple immune subpopulations from either bulk or single-cell RNA-seq. We give examples of machine and deep learning models used to predict patient outcomes and treatment effect from high-dimensional data. Finally, we balance the strengths and weaknesses of single-cell and bulk RNA-seq regarding their applications in the clinic., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement M.K., D.M., M.A., F.X.D. and A.Z. have no conflict of interest to declare. L.V. reports personal fees from Adaptherapy, non-personal fees from Pierre-Fabre and Servier, grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, all outside the submitted work. As part of the Drug Development Department (DITEP), A.M. and L.V. report being: Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for Abbvie, Adaptimmune, Aduro Biotech, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Argen-X Bvba, Arno Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca Ab, Aveo, Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd, Bayer Healthcare Ag, Bbb Technologies Bv, Beigene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ca, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Clovis Oncology, Cullinan-Apollo, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eisai Limited, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, Faron Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Forma Therapeutics, Gamamabs, Genentech, Glaxosmithkline, H3 Biomedicine, Hoffmann La Roche Ag, Imcheck Therapeutics, Innate Pharma, Institut De Recherche Pierre Fabre, Iris Servier, Janssen Cilag, Janssen Research Foundation, Kura Oncology, Kyowa Kirin Pharm. Dev, Lilly France, Loxo Oncology, Lytix Biopharma As, Medimmune, Menarini Ricerche, Merck Sharp & Dohme Chibret, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Merus, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Molecular Partners Ag, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis Pharma, Octimet Oncology Nv, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides, Orion Pharma, Ose Pharma, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Pierre Fabre, Medicament, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Seattle Genetics, Sotio A.S, Syros Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Pharma, Tesaro, Xencor. Research Grants from AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Onxeo, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi. Non-financial support (drug supplied) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medimmune, Merck, NH TherAGuiX, Onxeo, Pfizer, Roche. A.Z. was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (Project No. 075-15-2020-808) and by European Union's Horizon 2020 program (grant No. 826121, iPC project)., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

The circulating metabolome provides a snapshot of the physiological state of the organism responding to pathogenic challenges. Here we report alterations in the plasma metabolome reflecting the clinical presentation of COVID-19 patients with mild (ambulatory) diseases, moderate disease (radiologically confirmed pneumonitis, hospitalization and oxygen therapy), and critical disease (in intensive care). This analysis revealed major disease- and stage-associated shifts in the metabolome, meaning that at least 77 metabolites including amino acids, lipids, polyamines and sugars, as well as their derivatives, were altered in critical COVID-19 patient's plasma as compared to mild COVID-19 patients. Among a uniformly moderate cohort of patients who received tocilizumab, only 10 metabolites were different among individuals with a favorable evolution as compared to those who required transfer into the intensive care unit. The elevation of one single metabolite, anthranilic acid, had a poor prognostic value, correlating with the maintenance of high interleukin-10 and -18 levels. Given that products of the kynurenine pathway including anthranilic acid have immunosuppressive properties, we speculate on the therapeutic utility to inhibit the rate-limiting enzymes of this pathway including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase.

The use of antagonistic immune checkpoint-targeted monoclonal antibodies has profoundly modified the standard of care and significantly increased the survival for many cancers. However, many patients still do not respond to those treatments. Biomarkers predictive for efficacy or failure of such immunotherapies would allow developing treatment stratification strategies which could further increase the survival rates of patients with cancer. Chemokines are a subset of the immune cell messenger molecules known as cytokines. Chemokines are key chemoattractant molecules which are essential for the homing of immune cells, notably within tumours. Therefore, they are good candidates for providing predictive biomarkers of the clinical response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapies. In this review, we summarise the recent advances in our understanding of the role of chemokines and how chemokine concentrations may set the tone for the efficacy of immune checkpoint-targeted immunotherapies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The funding of research on chemokines in the laboratory of A.M. is partly funded by academic grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Fondation MSDAvenir and CIC BT Inserm 1428. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We investigated the activities of an ImmunoTOX board, an academic, multidisciplinary group of oncologists and organ specialists that adopts a real-life, case-by-case approach in the management of patients with immune-related adverse events (irAEs)., Experimental Design: The ImmunoTOX assessment board was set up in 2016 at Gustave Roussy in France. It meets every 2 weeks to discuss the case-by-case management of patients presenting with irAEs. Here, we describe the ImmunoTOX board's activities between 2016 and 2019., Results: Over study period, 398 requests (concerning 356 patients) were submitted to the ImmunoTOX board. Most of the requests concerned the putative causal link between immunotherapy and the irAE (n = 148, 37%), followed by possible retreatment after temporary withdrawal because of an adverse event (n = 109, 27%), the clinical management of complex situations (n = 100, 25%) and the initiation of immunotherapy in patients with pre-existing comorbidities (n = 41, 10%). The ImmunoTOX board discerned 273 irAEs. The five organ systems most frequently involved by irAEs were lung (n = 58, 21%), gastrointestinal tract (n = 36, 13%), liver or biliary tract (n = 33, 12%), musculoskeletal system (n = 27, 10%), and nervous system (n = 23, 8%). The time to occurrence was shorter for severe irAEs (grade III and VI) than for mild irAEs (grades I and II), with medians of 47 and 91 days, respectively (p = 0.0216)., Conclusion: The main medical needs in the management of irAEs involved the lung organ. Severe irAEs were expected to occur earlier than mild irAEs. This real-life study can help to better estimate medical needs and therefore help to assess the management of irAEs., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Pr Olivier Lambotte: Has received expert testimony and consultancy fees from BMS France, MSD, and Astra Zeneca, consultancy fees from Genzyme, and expert testimony fees from Janssen. Dr Jean-Marie Michot: Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for: Abbvie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, Gamamabs, Genentech, Gortec, GSK, H3 biomedecine, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, Medimmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro, Xencor. PERSONAL FEES (Monies paid to you for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speakers bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.): Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Janssen. Dr Aurélien Marabelle: Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for: Abbvie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, Gamamabs, Genentech, Gortec, GSK, H3 biomedecine, Incyte, Innate Pharma, Janssen, Kura Oncology, Kyowa, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, Medimmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro, Xencor. PERSONAL FEES (Monies paid to you for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speakers bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.): Medimmune, Pfizer, Servier, AstraZeneca, Janssen Bristol-Myers Squibb. Pr Christophe Massard: Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for: Abbvie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, Medimmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro, Xencor. PERSONAL FEES (Monies paid to you for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speakers bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.): Medimmune, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb. Pr Jean-Charles Soria: From September 2017 to the end of 2019, Pr Soria was Senior Vice-President Research & Development Oncology at AstraZeneca in Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States. Pr Benjamin Besse: Sponsored research at Gustave Roussy Cancer CenterAbbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cristal Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, GSK, Ignyta, IPSEN, Janssen, Merck KGaA, MSD, Nektar, Onxeo, OSE Immunopharmaceutics, Pfizer, Pharma Mar, Sanofi, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Tiziana Pharma. Dr Stéphane Champiat: Principal/sub-Investigator of Clinical Trials for: Abbvie, Aduro, Agios, Amgen, Argen-x, Astex, AstraZeneca, Aveo pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Beigene, Blueprint, BMS, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eisai, Eos, Exelixis, Forma, Lilly, Loxo, Lysarc, Lytix Biopharma, Medimmune, Menarini, Merus, MSD, Nanobiotix, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Octimet, Oncoethix, Oncopeptides AB, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sierra Oncology, Taiho, Takeda, Tesaro, Xencor. PERSONAL FEES (Monies paid to you for services rendered, generally honoraria, royalties or fees for consulting, lectures, speakers bureaus, expert testimony, employment, ad-boards, etc.): Amgen. All other authors: no conflicts of interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)