Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the short and long term clinical outcomes of endovascular (EVAR) vs. open surgical repair (OSR) of juxtarenal (JAAAs) and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (PAAAs) in five high volume European academic centres. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre cohort study of five high volume European academic centres (> 50 open or 50 endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs annually) including 834 consecutive patients who were operated on and prospectively followed. Using propensity score matching (PSM) each patient who underwent OSR was matched with one patient who underwent EVAR in a 1:1 ratio (145 patients per group). The primary endpoint was long term all cause mortality, while the secondary endpoint was freedom from aortic related re-intervention. Results: After a follow up of 87 months, no difference in overall survival between the two groups was observed (38.6% for EVAR vs. 42.1% for OSR; p =.88). Patients undergoing EVAR underwent aortic related re-interventions more frequently (24.1% vs. 6.9%; p

Objective: The characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing vascular surgery hospitalised and managed in Lombardy are described with a comparison of patients tested positive for COVID-19 (CV19-pos) vs. those tested negative (CV19-neg). Methods: This was a multicentre, retrospective, observational cohort study which involved all vascular surgery services in Lombardy, Northern Italy. Data were retrospectively merged into a combined dataset covering the nine weeks of the Italian COVID-19 pandemic phase 1 (8 March 2020 to 3 May 2020). The primary outcome was freedom from in hospital death, secondary outcomes were re-thrombosis rate after peripheral revascularisation, and freedom from post-operative complication. Results: Among 674 patients managed during the outbreak, 659 (97.8%) were included in the final analysis: 121 (18.4%) were CV19-pos. CV19-pos status was associated with a higher rate of complications (OR 4.5; p < .001, 95% CI 2.64 – 7.84), and a higher rate of re-thrombosis after peripheral arterial revascularisation (OR 2.2; p = .004, 95% CI 1.29 – 3.88). In hospital mortality was higher in CV19-pos patients (24.8% vs. 5.6%; OR 5.4, p < .001;95% CI 2.86 – 8.92). Binary logistic regression analysis identified CV19-pos status (OR 7.6; p < .001, 95% CI 3.75 – 15.28) and age > 80 years (OR 3.2; p = .001, 95% CI 1.61 – 6.57) to be predictors of in hospital death. Conclusion: In this experience of the vascular surgery group of Lombardy, COVID-19 infection was a marker of poor outcomes in terms of mortality and post-operative complications for patients undergoing vascular surgery treatments.

Background: Postoperative pain after thoracoabdominal (TAAA) or thoracic (TAA) aortic aneurysm open surgical repair may be debilitating and induce limitations in mobilization resulting in a longer length of stay, higher rate of pulmonary adverse events, readmissions, and a higher risk of mortality. Commonly employed analgesic strategies do not completely solve this issue and have their own drawbacks. Cryoablation of intercostal nerves has been proposed as an appealing alternative to address the postoperative pain. Methods: Between 2020 and 2021, data of all consecutive patients undergoing TAA or TAAA aortic aneurysms open repair with electroneurography-guided cryoablation of intercostal nerves were collected. Postoperative pain was recorded using patient-reported 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS). Need for adjunctive opioid drugs and postoperative complications were also recorded. Narcotic usage was calculated as morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) per day. Results: A total of 15 patients (8 males, mean age 61.1-year-old) underwent open surgical repair for TAAA (13 cases) or TAA (2 cases) and received intercostal nerve cryoablation. There were no intraoperative deaths and cases of spinal cord ischemia. Overall, 70 intercostal nerves underwent electroneurography-guided cryoablation, with a mean of 4.6 nerves per patient. On the first day after extubating, mean NRS was 4.6 and the MMEs calculated was 6.7, decreasing over the days. There was one case of pneumonia and atelectasis requiring bronchoscopy. There were no reported bowel complications. The mean postoperative length of stay was 16 days and in the intensive care unit stay was 6.5 days. Conclusions: Electroneurography-guided cryoablation of intercostal nerves is a safe and reproducible technique which can be used in addition to systemic pain management for TAA and TAAA open repair.

Background During the first phase of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Italy, several strategies have been taken to deal with the pandemic outbreak. Aim of the study To report the remodeling of the Vascular Surgery Department of San Raffaele Hospital as regards the strategies of preparation, escalation, and return to normal activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preparation, escalation, de-escalation The Regional Authority of Lombardy remodeled the hospitalization system to allocate appropriate resources to treat patients with COVID-19 and to identify "Hub/Spoke" hospitals for highly specialized medical activities. The Hubs hospitals were required to guarantee full-time evaluation of all patients presenting with cardiovascular diseases with an independent pathway for patients with suspect or confirmed COVID-19 infection. San Raffaele Hospital was identified as Hub for cardiovascular emergencies and the Vascular Surgery Department was remodeled to face this epidemic situation. Surgical treatment was reserved only to symptomatic, urgent, or emergent cases. Large areas of the hospital were simultaneously reorganized to assist patients with COVID-19. Results During this period, 135 patients were referred to San Raffaele Vascular Surgery Department. COVID-19 was diagnosed in 24 patients and, among them, acute limb ischemia was the most common cause of admission. At this time, the COVID-19 trend is in decline in Italy, and the local authorities reorganized the healthcare system to return to normal activities avoiding new escalations of COVID-19 cases. The COVID-19 pandemic will be remembered in Lombardy as a cataclysm. Nevertheless, the HUB/spoke system has proven to be a valid model in the management of ischemic emergencies. Continuous surveillance, cooperation, coordination, and communication to effectively respond to COVID-19 pandemic is crucial because COVID-19 reference centers could face similar issues in the near future.

Objectives To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a multistaged approach for elective thoraco-abdominal aneurysm (TAAAs) repair by means of endovascular fenestrated and/or branched (F/B-EVAR) grafts. Methods Between 2013 and 2018, 80 high risk surgical patients received elective F/B-EVAR for TAAAs with a protocolled multistaged approach (thoracic, visceral, and limb steps) and were enrolled in an ambispective single centre study called STEAR (STaged Endovascular Aortic Repair - NCT03342755 ). Data regarding all study participants, single step mortality and morbidity (systemic complications) rates were recorded and the overall results were considered for statistical analysis. Results Previous aortic interventions (61/80 cases, 76.3%) combined with the TAAA extents resulted in different staging strategies: 58 patients (73%) had a thoracic step and 33 (41%) a limb step. The median TAAA treatment time was 77 days (50–107). The overall mortality was six cases (8%) and 30 day clinical success rate 64 cases (80%). The overall rate of grade 2 or 3 (including death) systemic complications was 19 cases (24%) and 20 patients (25%) experienced grade 1 complications. Three patients with type II or III TAAAs (4%) had permanent and fatal spinal cord (SC) impairment. On multivariable analysis, SC ischaemia was associated with an aortic coverage ≥350 mm (OR: 9.15, p = .03, 95% CI: 1.3–66.4) and bovine arch (OR: 10.6, p = .01, 95% CI: 1.6–68.6). The overall short term (six month) clinical success was 72 cases (90%) and none experienced SC ischaemia after late endoleak resolution or treatment. At mid term (mean follow up: 13.3 ± 15.4 months), the overall freedom from conversions, re-interventions, late rupture, or type I and III endoleaks was 57 of 72 survivors (79%). Conclusions A multistaged approach with a third limb step in case of TAAAs is safe and technically feasible, with an acceptable rate of permanent spinal cord ischaemia. Different staging methods and protocols have been proposed and standardisation is required, especially for type I-II-III aneurysms.

Background: To report our experience with the open repair (OR) of hostile-necked, juxtarenal, pararenal, and suprarenal (SR) aortic aneurysms (proximal abdominal aortic aneurysms) and stratify the results according to the equivalent endovascular repair. Methods: Data from all patients treated between 2010 and 2015 were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were analyzed to plan a hypothetical equivalent endovascular approach (2, 3, and 4 fenestrations [FENs]). Postoperative results were recorded based on the cross-clamping level: supraceliac (SC), SR, and infrarenal (IR). Major adverse events (MAEs) were defined as the presence of one of the following: all-cause mortality, bowel ischemia, myocardial infarction, paraplegia, respiratory failure, stroke, and renal insufficiency. Results: One hundred fifty-seven patients were treated; 93 met the CT scan criteria (slice thickness

Endovascular treatment is the current standard of care for complicated acute and subacute type B aortic dissection. Closure of the primary entry tear with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) is often insufficient to induce complete false lumen thrombosis and a positive aortic remodeling. Moreover TEVAR doesn't solve all the cases of malperfusion. The Provisional ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment (PETTICOAT) technique (deploying self-expandable bare metal stents in the true lumen in addition to TEVAR) can re-expand the true lumen, stabilize the lamella and promote aortic remodeling, but it does not recreate a single-lumen aorta and long-term aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta is frequent. Endovascular treatment by means of TEVAR + PETTICOAT does not recreate a single-lumen aorta so long-term aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta is frequent. The stent-assisted, balloon-induced intimal disruption and relamination of aortic dissection (STABILISE) technique may help to this purpose disrupting the intimal lamella and creating a relaminated uni-luminal aorta.

BACKGROUND: To highlight clinical practice among referral (Hub, HH) or satellite (Spoke, SH) hospitals Vascular Surgery Units (VSUs) in Lombardy, during the COVID-19 pandemic "phase 1" period (March 8 - May 3, 2020). METHODS: The Vascular Surgery Group of Regione Lombardia Register, a real-word, multicenter, retrospective register was interrogated. All patients admitted with vascular disease were included. Patients' data on demographics, COVID-19 positivity, comorbidities and outcomes were extrapolated. Two cohorts were obtained: patients admitted to HH or SH. Primary endpoint was 30- day mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day complications and amputation (in case of peripheral artery disease [PAD]) rates. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to compare HH and SH groups and predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: During the study period, 659 vascular patients in 4 HH and 27 SH were analyzed. Among these, 321 (48.7%) were admitted to a HH. No difference in COVID-19 positive patients was described (21.7% in HH vs 15.9% in SH; p=.058). After 30 days from intervention, HH and SH experienced similar mortality and no-intervention-related complication rate (12.1% vs 10.0%; p=.427 and 10.3% vs 8.3%; p=.377, respectively). Conversely, in HH postoperative complications were higher (23.4% vs 16.9%, p=.038) and amputations in patients treated for PAD were lower (10.8% vs 26.8%; p

We present a dynamic multilevel framework for analyzing the mutual dependence of change in interorganizational networks and internal organizational structure. Change occurring at the former (interorganizational) level involves decisions to change the portfolio of network ties to external partners. Change occurring in the latter (intraorganizational) level involves decisions to change the portfolio of internal activities. We estimate a recently derived class of stochastic actor-oriented models (SAOMs) that we adopt and adapt to specify how decisions to change internal portfolios of activities and external portfolios of partners are connected by theoretically derived multilevel mixing and closure mechanisms that link organizational and network structures. We show that statistical models for multilevel networks reproduce with high fidelity the structural regularities observed in the distribution of: (i) activities within organizations; (ii) network ties between organizations, and (iii) knowledge available in the organizational field. We discuss the implications of the study for theory development, and for empirical research on interorganizational and other kinds of multilevel networks.

Introduction The best management of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) remains controversial, especially when they are located from the mid to distal portions of the main renal artery. Our aim is to evaluate our 10-year experience with in situ open surgical repairs from a cohort of non-proximal RAAs at a single vascular surgery center. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent RAA in situ repairs located from the mid to distal portions of the renal artery at our Institution was performed between 2009 and 2020. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, aneurysm location and morphology, type of in situ technique, and perioperative data were assessed. Postoperative biomarkers and renal function were collected, and mid-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results A total of 15 RAA located at mid and distal portions of the renal artery repaired with in situ techniques were performed in 15 patients (nine men, mean age 62.4 ± 6.36 years). At diagnosis, 12 patients were asymptomatic; a history of abdominal pain was found in one patient, and two patients had drug-resistant hypertension. Two patients had already undergone previous unsuccessful attempts of endovascular treatment. All patients presented an aneurysm diameter >20 mm (mean diameter 2.75 ± 5 mm). At admission, mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate were 1.10 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 69.8 ± 9.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Nine lesions were present in the distal portion of the renal artery, with 4 cases having ≥3 efferent branches and the other 5 with two efferent branches. The other six RAAs were in the mid-portion: in 4 cases, one efferent branch, and in 2 cases, two efferent branches were involved. All patients underwent in situ open repair: an end-to-end anastomosis was performed in 9 cases, aneurysm resection with primary closure in 3 cases, bypass with graft interposition in 2 cases (one iliac-renal reconstruction), and with vein interposition in 1 case. The mean renal ischemia time was 21.8 ± 9.4 min. A significant decrease on renal function was not observed (mean glomerular filtration rate at discharge: 64.8 ± 12.0 mL/min/1.73m2; P > 0.22). During recovery, one patient developed retroperitoneal hematoma treated conservatively. During follow-up (mean 46 months, range 2–135), one patient developed occlusion of a terminal renal artery branch without decreased kidney function. Conclusion In situ techniques for RAA from the mid to distal portions of the renal artery are technically complex; however, based on our results, these procedures were safe and effective, providing satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes.

Purpose: TEVAR (thoracic endovascular aortic repair) + PETTICOAT (Provisional ExTension to Induce COmplete ATtachment) technique has been selectively employed since 2005 at our institution during endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissection (TBD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term (>5 years) clinical results and the evolution of aortic volume. Materials and Methods: All the patients receiving an endovascular treatment for TBD with the PETTICOAT technique were collected in a prospectively maintained database and follow-up computed tomography scan were retrospectively analyzed. Study endpoints included short- and long-term clinical success (absence of need for reintervention) and any major adverse event. The volumes of thoracic and abdominal aorta at long-term follow-up were also analyzed. Results: Twenty-eight patients received a TEVAR + PETTICOAT and were followed up (median follow-up 85 months). Primary 30-day clinical success rate was 82% with an adverse event rate of 31%; 4 type I endoleak and 1 retrograde dissection were recorded. Secondary mid-term clinical success was 96% while the long-term clinical success rate was 79%. Six cases (21%) received either an open repair or an endovascular repair for a significant distal aortic enlargement at follow-up. With regards to volumetric analysis, an increase of overall (thoracic and abdominal) aortic volume was observed in 8 cases mainly related to an increase (mean: +31%) of the abdominal volume that was observed in 11 cases. Conclusions: PETTICOAT technique does not protect from long-term significant aneurysmal degeneration that may require aortic open or endovascular reinterventions. Aortic growth occurs mainly in the bare-stented aorta and thus, life-long surveillance is advisable in these patients.

BACKGROUND Previous research suggests that multidisciplinary team communication networks enhance knowledge exchange, learning, and quality of care in health organizations. However, little is known about team members' reliance on face-to-face versus electronic-based communication networks for information and knowledge exchange. PURPOSE The aim of the study was to describe patterns of face-to-face versus electronic-based communication networks in a multidisciplinary team and to explore the relationships between team communication networks and performance, measured as promptness of treatment implementation. METHODOLOGY We collected data on work-based communication among members of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) in a large Italian research hospital. A social network survey was administered in 2016 to all board members to gather network data on face-to-face interaction and the use of electronically based communication channels (e-mail, text messages, and WhatsApp) for sharing clinical knowledge. Twenty physicians (71%) completed the survey. Archival data were accessed to obtain detailed information about 222 clinical cases discussed over a 1-year period during weekly MDT meetings. Minutes of board meetings were used to link all discussed cases to team members. We used the multiple regression quadratic assignment procedure (MR-QAP) to study associations between team member characteristics and communication networks. Negative binomial regression was employed to test relationships between team communication networks and performance. RESULTS MDT members relied on different communication channels for knowledge sharing. The geographical proximity of team members positively predicted the frequency of face-to-face interaction. Physicians' seniority was related to the use of WhatsApp as a communication channel; greater interaction of this type was observed between team members of different seniority. Performance was related positively to face-to-face communication networks but negatively to communication via WhatsApp. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Although team communication networks are important for knowledge exchange, health administrators must pay attention to the increasing propensity of team members to rely on electronic-based communication. The use of these easy-to-use tools can hinder the quality of group discussion and debate.

Purpose: To evaluate patients characteristics, procedural details, perioperative outcomes, and midterm results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed with the Roadsaver/Casper stent (Terumo Corp, Tokyo, Japan) as compared to concurrent patients treated with other commercially available carotid stents. Materials and Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective, nonrandomized study including 200 consecutive patients who underwent a total of 205 elective CAS procedures due to severe internal carotid artery stenosis between April 2015 and December 2018. Procedural data and outcomes for patients treated with the Roadsaver/Casper stent implantation (100 procedures, in 97 patients) vs first-generation carotid stents implantations (90 procedures, in 88 patients) were compared. Fifteen patients were treated with CGuard carotid stent (InspireMD, Tel Aviv, Israel), and outcomes were reported separately. Primary endpoints were the occurrence of major adverse cerebrovascular events (MACE), including death, ipsilateral stroke, and transitory ischemic attack (TIA). Secondary endpoints were the rate of intrastent stenosis, the need for reintervention, and the occurrence of adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and need for inotropic support. Results: No difference in demographics and preoperative risk factors were observed between patients treated with and without the Roadsaver/Casper stent. The mean procedure time was shorter in the Roadsaver/Casper group (40.7±16.9 vs 49.4±27.3 minutes; p=0.008), while radial percutaneous access was more frequent (24% vs 5%; pConclusions: In this real-world cohort of patients undergoing CAS, the Roadsaver/Casper stent was used to treat more symptomatic and vulnerable carotid plaques as compared to other carotid stents. Nevertheless, patients treated with this low-profile dual-layer micromesh stent showed low events rates at both 30 days and follow-up, similar to that observed for other stents.

During the first phase of COVID-19 pandemic in Italy, several strategies have been taken to deal with the pandemic outbreak. The Regional Authority of Lombardy remodeled the hospitalization system in order to allocate appropriate resources to treat COVID-19 patients and to identify “Hub/Spoke” hospitals for highly specialized medical activities. The Hubs hospitals were required to guarantee full time evaluation of all patients presenting with cardiovavascular diseases with an independent pathway for patients with suspect or confirmed COVID-19 infection. San Raffaele Hospital was identified as Hub for cardiovascular emergencies and the Vascular Surgery Department was remodeled to face this epidemic situation. Surgical treatment was reserved only to symptomatic, urgent or emergent cases. Large areas of the hospital were simultaneously reorganized to assist COVID-19 patients. During this period, 135 patients were referred to San Raffaele Vascular Surgery Department. COVID-19 was diagnosed in 24 patients and, among them, acute limb ischemia was the most common cause of admission. At this time, the COVID-19 trend is in decline in Italy and the local authorities reorganized the health care system in order to return to normal activities avoiding new escalations of COVID-19 cases. Several strategies have been taken to ensure the safety of the San Raffaele hospital, and maintaining potentially suspected patients with COVID-19 separated from other patients. The aim of this paper is to report the remodeling of the Vascular Surgery Department of San Raffaele Hospital as regards the strategies of preparation, escalation, de-escalation and return to normal activities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumor (CBT) surgical management. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our center. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (5 cm). RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs. 16 (31.4%) vs. 2 (15.4%); P=0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (P=0.030), maximum diameter (P=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (P=0.035) and dysphagia (P=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (P=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (P=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (P

Background The aim of this study was to report the experience of one of the major “hubs” for vascular surgery in Lombardy, Italy, during the first 7 weeks after total lockdown due to COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data from all patients treated at our Department since the decision of the regional healthcare authorities of Lombardy to centralize surgical specialties creating a hub/spoke system (March 9, 2020) were prospectively collected and compared with a retrospectively collected cohort from the same period of year 2019. Primary study end point was defined as primary clinical success. Secondary end points were defined as in-hospital mortality and/or any in hospital major adverse event or lower limb amputation. Results One hundred sixteen patients were treated (81 men, 70%; median age: 71 years, IQR 65–81). Thirty-two patients (28%) were addressed from spoke hospitals directly referring to our hub, 19 (16%) from hospitals belonging to other hub/spoke nets, 48 (41%) came directly from our emergency department, and 17 (15%) were already hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia. Acute limb ischemia was the most observed disease, occurring in 31 (26.7%), 12 (38.7%) of whom were found positive for COVID-19 pneumonia on admission, whereas 3 (9.7%) became positive during hospitalization. Chronic limb ischemia was the indication to treatment in 24 (20.7%) patients. Six (5.2%) patients underwent primary amputation for irreversible ischemia. Aortic emergencies included 21 cases (18.1%), including 13 (61.9%) symptomatic abdominal aortic or iliac aneurysms, 4 (19.0%) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, 2 (9.5%) cases of acute type B aortic dissection (one post-traumatic). Seventeen (14.7%) patients were admitted for symptomatic carotid stenosis (no COVID-19 patients); all of them underwent carotid endarterectomy. Seventeen (14.7%) cases were treated for other vascular emergencies. Overall, at a median follow-up of 23 ± 13 days, primary clinical success was 87.1% and secondary clinical success was 95.9%. We recorded 3 in-hospital deaths for an overall mortality rate of 2.6%. Compared with the 2019 cohort, “COVID era” patients were older (72 vs. 63 years, P = 0.002), more frequently transferred from other hospitals (44% vs. 21%, P = 0.014) and more frequently with decompensated chronic limb threatening ischemia (21% vs. 3%, P = 0.015); surgical outcomes were similar between the 2 cohorts. Conclusions Since its appearance, SARS-CoV-2 has been testing all national healthcare systems which founds themselves facing an unprecedented emergency. Late referral in the pandemic period could seriously worsen limb prognosis; this aspect should be known and addressed by health care providers. Vascular surgical outcomes in pre-COVID and COVID era were comparable in our experience.

Analysis of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases with new low-profile stent-grafts in large series is crucial to understand the durability of these devices. This study reports the mid-term outcomes of a single-center experience with the Zenith Alpha Thoracic EndoGraft (ZTA). Objective: The analysis of endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic diseases using new low-profile stent grafts in large series is crucial to understanding the durability of these devices. The present study reports the midterm outcomes of a single-center experience using the Zenith Alpha thoracic endovascular stent graft. Methods: The outcomes of 270 procedures performed on 262 patients (197 men; mean age, 70.5 ± 9.5 years) using the Zenith Alpha thoracic endovascular stent graft from November 2013 to December 2019 for different thoracic aortic diseases were analyzed. The primary endpoints were 30-day clinical success and midterm (5-year) clinical success. The secondary endpoints were the adverse event rate at 30 days and midterm and access- and device-related complications. The follow-up of surviving patients was performed using computed tomography angiography and office visits at 1, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for overall survival, and freedom from thoracic aortic endovascular repair–related mortality and related reinterventions. Results: The overall 30-day mortality was 5.2% (2.5% for elective and 30.8% for nonelective cases). Type I endoleaks were identified in six patients. The 30-day primary technical and clinical success rates were 97.8% and 92.6%, respectively. Femoral cutdown was used in 41.1% of cases and percutaneous access in 58.5%. The rate of femoral artery complications after the percutaneous approach was 5.1%, with the need for surgical conversion in 1.9%. The stroke rate was 4.1% (major stroke, 2.2%), and the spinal cord ischemia rate was 3.7% (permanent paraplegia, 0.7%). Of the 248 survivors, 239 complied with the follow-up protocol with adequate computed tomography angiograms available images. Overall follow-up survival was 94.0% at 1 year, 91.6% at 2 years, 88.9% at 3 years, and 88.5% at 5 years. The unplanned secondary endovascular procedure rate was 5.3%. No stent fractures or new-onset type I endoleaks due to stent graft migration were observed in the study cohort. Conclusions: The midterm outcomes of this new generation of low-profile devices were satisfactory. The reported low incidence of secondary procedures and the absence of migrations are promising for the long-term durability of these devices.

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been proposed as the treatment of choice in case of restenosis (RES) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to analyze periprocedural results of CAS for the treatment of post-CEA RES compared with those of CAS performed for primary carotid stenosis (PRS).Data from consecutive patients submitted to CAS at our institution from 2008 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with in-stent RES were excluded. Initially, preoperative risk factors, demographics, intraoperative variables, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed according to the indication groups (PRS and RES). Then, propensity score matching was performed obtaining 2 homogeneous groups of patients. Covariates included were age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, cardiac disease, chronic renal disease, symptomatic carotid plaque, and positive ipsilateral brain computed tomography scan. Intraoperative data and perioperative outcomes were then compared between the 2 matched groups.Of 480 included patients, 300 (62.5%) underwent CAS for PRS, and 180 (37.5%) for RES. After propensity score analysis (158 patients/group), no significant difference was observed in terms of technical success, number, and type of stent used, except for need of intraoperative atropine administration that was higher in the PRS group (38.6% vs. 13.3%, respectively; P 0.001). In the perioperative period, composite neurologic event was significantly higher in the PRS group (7.6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.017). Moreover, need of ionotropic support was higher in the PRS group (8.9% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.0069). Myocardial infarction rate and 30-day mortality were similar in both groups (P = 0.317; P = 1, respectively).In a large single-center experience, CAS for post-CEA RES was associated with a significantly lower risk of any neurologic event and hemodynamic instability in the perioperative period compared with CAS performed for primary carotid lesions. Our results confirm that post-CEA RES may represent an elective indication for CAS.

Abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) have changed the aortic surgery, due to several advantages in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality. However, increasing rate of late complications requiring secondary procedures has been observed over time. Even if the majority of them may be treated by means of endovascular techniques, late open surgical conversion (LOSC) is required in specific situations. This paper aims to provide our single-center experience with LOSCs and an updated review of the literature. From 1995 to 2020, indications and outcomes of patients treated with LOSC for failed EVAR and TEVAR, at our institutions, were analyzed. LOSC was required to treat a broad range of complications that were classified into two main groups: "disease related" and "stent-graft (SG) related." Among the 121 patients treated with LOSC after EVAR, endoleak (75.2%) represented the most common indication. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 3.3%. A higher mortality rate was associated with infection after EVAR (p. 006). Among the 81 patients treated with LOSC after TEVAR, endoleak (32.1%) was the most common indication. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 13.6% with a higher incidence in the SG-related group (p. 02). LOSC is associated with an increased surgical complexity, in both the abdominal and thoracic area, that results in higher morbidity and mortality rates compared with standard open repair. Depending on the indication to LOSC, specific surgical maneuvers are required to improve clinical outcomes.

Objective During the most aggressive phase of the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy, the Regional Authority of Lombardy identified a number of hospitals, named Hubs, chosen to serve the whole region for highly specialised cases, including vascular surgery. This study reports the experience of the four Hubs for Vascular Surgery in Lombardy and provides a comparison of in hospital mortality and major adverse events (MAEs) according to COVID-19 testing. Methods Data from all patients who were referred to the Vascular Surgery Department of Hubs from 9 March to 28 April 2020 were collected prospectively and analysed. A positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction swab test, or symptoms (fever > 37.5 °C, upper respiratory tract symptoms, chest pain, and contact/travel history) associated with interstitial pneumonia on chest computed tomography scan were considered diagnostic of COVID-19 disease. Patient characteristics, operative variables, and in hospital outcomes were compared according to COVID-19 testing. A multivariable model was used to identify independent predictors of in hospital death and MAEs. Results Among 305 included patients, 64 (21%) tested positive for COVID-19 (COVID group) and 241 (79%) did not (non-COVID group). COVID patients presented more frequently with acute limb ischaemia than non-COVID patients (64% vs. 23%; p

Background To report the postoperative renal function stratified according to the visceral vessels (VV) revascularization technique used during proximal abdominal aortic aneurisms (p-AAA) open surgical repair (OR). Methods Data from all patients with p-AAA who were submitted to OR between 2010 and 2015 at our Institute were prospectively collected and analyzed. A postoperative deterioration of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by 25% within four days was defined as acute kidney injury (AKI) 1. Only AKI 2 (50% decrease in eGFR) and AKI 3 (75% decrease in eGFR) were considered significant for renal impairment after the procedure. Primary study end point was defined as the presence of AKI 2 or 3. Secondary end points were 30-day mortality and/or any major adverse event. Results During the study period, 157 consecutive patients (145 men and 12 women; mean age: 72±7 years) were treated. Sixty (38,2%) were cross-clamped supraceliac, 53 (33,8%) were cross-clamped suprarenal and 44 (28%) were cross- clamped inter/infrarenal. Vessel reattachment was not needed in 104 cases (66.2%). A beveled aortic anastomosis was performed in 10 (6.4%) patients, a beveled anastomosis and left renal artery (LRA) direct revascularization in 10 (6.4%), Crawford inclusion technique in 11 (7%), Crawford inclusion technique and LRA direct revascularization in six (3.8%) and direct revascularization of one or more renal arteries in 16 (10.2%). Peri-operative mortality was 1.9%. An increased incidence of AKI 2 and AKI 3 was observed in patients undergoing revascularization of all VV with LRA separate revascularization: in particular 40% of of beveled proximal anastomosis (p=0.001) and in 16.7 of Crawford inclusion technique (p=0.025) respectively. On the other hand, those patients who did not require any VV revascularization had a decreased incidence of AKI>1 (p=0.010). The follow-up data of 63.6±21 months shows no significant difference in renal function according to the revascularization technique used compared to the perioperative period. Conclusions Postoperative renal failure after p-AAAs repair is still a major concern although perfusion techniques and organ protection are important to reduce its frequency. Despite recent development of complex endovascular techniques, OR, when offered in high-volume centers, remains safe, effective and durable.

BACKGROUND In many health systems, general practitioners (GPs) exhibit high levels of isolation and, at the same time, low levels of organizational identification, which can hinder their individual performance. The extant health care literature suggests that the physicians' belief that organizational goals are important, the adoption of performance measurement systems, and knowledge-sharing practices affect their individual performance. Most research has investigated these constructs in isolation, however, rather than explored their collective impact on GPs' individual performance. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to explore how GPs' belief in goal importance, use of performance measures, and knowledge exchange affect their individual performance, here defined as their individual achievement of organizational goals. METHODOLOGY We developed five hypotheses regarding how GPs' belief in goal importance and use of performance measures may affect individual performance, as well as how knowledge exchange may moderate these relationships. We tested our theoretical conjectures using data collected in a community of GPs in the Italian National Health Service. A survey questionnaire was administered to gather information about the GPs' level of belief in goal importance, use of performance measures, and perception about knowledge exchange in their primary care units. We considered two measures of GPs' individual performance: efficiency and appropriateness of drug prescription. We tested our hypotheses using probit regressions. RESULTS Our findings show that perceived importance of organizational goals and use of performance measures have a positive effect on GPs' individual performance. Meanwhile, GPs' use of performance measures moderates the relationship between their belief in goal importance and individual performance. Finally, perceived knowledge exchange moderates the relationships between belief in goal importance/use of performance measures and individual performance. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Executives could improve GPs' individual performance through interventions that reinforce their belief that organizational goals are important, facilitate a more intensive use of performance measures, and encourage knowledge exchange practices.

Hospital reorganizations are difficult and often fail to produce their intended benefits. Prior research has investigated how and under which contingencies changes in organizational structure affect the modification of clinician behaviors, yet we know little about how organizational redesign interventions affect physicians' collaborative networks. This paper explores how hospital reorganizations affect physicians' network churn. We developed hypotheses on the relationship between structural characteristics of networks before reorganization and the formation of cross-unit network ties after reorganization. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 175 physicians in a large teaching hospital. The hospital had recently adopted a new organizational model aimed at enhancing a process-based approach to care delivery. Our findings revealed that the physicians' propensity to form cross-unit ties after the change was related to the structure of their collaborative networks before the change. In particular, the formation of cross-unit relations was negatively related to the size of advice networks before the reorganization. Furthermore, we found that the diversity of network ties along with the presence of structural holes in the physicians’ networks before the change moderated this relationship. We discussed the theoretical and practical implications of our findings. In particular, our results may inform organizational redesign interventions within hospitals.

Il processo di adozione delle tecnologie sanitarie e al centro del dibattito scientifico ed istituzionale nei contesti odierni. Il costo delle soluzioni tecnologiche, e il loro progressivo utilizzo nell’ambito dei processi di cura, rendono essenziale un’attivita di selezione di quelle tecnologie realmente capaci di generare valore. Comprendere i fattori in grado di accelerare o rallentare il processo innovativo e quindi attivita estremamente utile ad adottare soluzioni organizzative idonee al contesto odierno e ad implementare tecnologie capaci di generare un impatto positivo sulla salute. Questo studio analizza, in particolare, gli effetti dei fattori istituzionali, organizzativi e professionali sull'adozione delle innovazioni sanitarie, ed e volto nello specifico a comprendere come tali dimensioni influenzino congiuntamente le scelte temporali di adozione. Selezionando una specifica tipologia di robot chirurgico quale oggetto dello studio, sono state raccolte informazioni sul relativo processo di diffusione all’interno del Servizio Sanitario Nazionale italiano e sono state investigate le decisioni di adozione degli ospedali, con riferimento alla temporalita di tali scelte. I risultati della ricerca indicano che i fattori professionali, cosi come la governance regionale e le politiche tecnologiche, incidono sulla temporalita delle decisioni di adozione da parte delle organizzazioni.

Don't stand so close to me: competitive pressures, proximity and inter-organizational collaboration. Regional Studies. This paper investigates how geographical proximity moderates the non-monotonic relation between niche overlap and the propensity of organizations to collaborate. The main prediction is that the strength of this relation is different for organizations with low versus high levels of geographical proximity. Proposed hypotheses are tested by using data collected within a community of hospital organizations serving more than 5 million residents in one of the largest Italian geographical regions. After controlling for internal resource complementarities and differences in organizational forms, behavioural orientations and institutional constraints among hospitals, this paper finds strong empirical support to the research hypotheses.

Psychological and social characteristics of individuals are important determinants of their health choices and behaviors. Social networks represent &ldquo, pipes&rdquo, through which information and opinions circulate and spread out in the social circle surrounding individuals, influencing their propensity toward important health care interventions. This paper aims to explore the relationship between students&rsquo, vaccination health choices and their social networks. We administered a questionnaire to students to collect data on individual students&rsquo, demographics, knowledge, and attitudes about vaccinations, as well as their social networks. Forty-nine pupils belonging to 4 classrooms in an Italian secondary school were enrolled in the study. We applied a logistic regression quadratic assignment procedure (LR-QAP) by regressing students&rsquo, positive responsive behavior similarity as a dependent variable. LRQAP findings indicate that students&rsquo, vaccination behavior similarity is significantly associated with after-school social ties and related social mechanisms, suggesting that pupils are more likely to share information and knowledge about health behaviors through social relationships maintained after school hours rather than through those established during the school day. Moreover, we found that vaccination behaviors are more similar for those students having the same ethnicity as well as for those belonging to the same class. Our findings may help policymakers in implementing effective vaccination strategies.

The purpose of this article is to describe the techniques used to deploy a Gore® Excluder® abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) in a short aortoiliac anatomy, expanding treatment options of a patient otherwise unfit for endovascular repair. Four strategies were used to shorten the total length of the components, achieving a reduction of over 3 cm during deployment: a pull-pull technique on a through-and-through guidewire to accommodate the IBE onto the iliac bifurcation, deployment in a “cross-limb” configuration, foreshortening of the iliac bridging component during release, and final proximal shortening of the AAA main body thanks to the C3 repositionable delivery system.

Open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is an extraordinary challenge for both vascular surgeons and patients. Consistent outcome data have been reported by high-volume centers with 30-day mortality rates lower than 10% and improved long-term survivals [1]. The development of devices and techniques have allowed total endovascular treatment of TAAA with fenestrated (FEVAR) or branched (BEVAR) endografts [2–6]. Early results are encouraging; a recent meta-analysis has reported a 30-day mortality rate of 8.6%, spinal cord ischemia in 17.3% of cases with permanent consequences in 4.9%, and renal failure in 25.4%. However, anatomic feasibility of BEVAR/FEVAR is still limited, manufacturing times for custom devices are lengthy, and open repair remains the only viable strategy in a number of specific conditions, such as emergency cases, infections, and patients affected by connective tissue disorders.

Perioperative renal failure is still one of the most feared complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair and represents a strong predictor for early and late mortality. Despite improvements in renal cold protection, a key role for renal function preservation is played by the reduction of ischemic time: this aspect can be obtained by different techniques for renal reconstruction. Moreover, the possibility of vessel damaging and early occlusions must be considered upon deciding the operating technique.

Coral reef aorta is an uncommon syndrome caused by a distribution of rock-hard calcifications in the visceral part of the aorta. These heavily calcified plaques grow into the lumen and can cause significant stenoses, which may develop into visceral ischemia, renovascular hypertension, and malperfusion of the lower limbs. We report here our surgical experience in treating 138 patients.

In organizations that focus on the execution of team-based tasks, the concept of team overlap refers to the extent to which individuals, who are part of a team involved in the execution of one task...

Background Many countries are seeing a dramatic increase in the average age of their clinicians. The literature often highlights the challenges of high replacement costs and the need for strategies to retain older personnel. Less discussed are the potential pitfalls of knowledge acquisition and transfer that accompany this aging issue. Purpose We propose a conceptual framework for understanding how clinicians' age interact with ability, motivation, and opportunity to predict clinical knowledge transfer and acquisition in health care organizations. Approach This study integrates life-span development perspectives with the ability-motivation-opportunity framework to develop a number of testable propositions on the interaction between age and clinicians' ability, motivation, and opportunity to acquire and transfer clinical knowledge. Results We posit that the interaction between ability (the knowledge and skills to acquire knowledge), motivation (the willingness to acquire and transfer knowledge), and opportunity (resources required for acquiring and transferring knowledge) is a determinant of successful knowledge management. We also suggest that clinicians' age-and more specifically, the cognitive and motivational changes that accompany aging-moderates these relationships. Conclusion This study contributes to existing research by offering a set of testable propositions for future research. These propositions will hopefully encourage empirical research into this important topic and lead to guidelines for reducing the risks of organizational knowledge loss due to aging. Practice implications We suggest several ways that health care organizations can tailor managerial practices in order to help capitalize on the knowledge-based resources held by their younger and older clinicians. Such initiatives may affect employees' ability (e.g., by providing specific training programs), motivation (e.g., by expanding subjective perceptions of future time at work), and opportunities (e.g., by providing mentoring, reverse mentoring, and coaching programs) to acquire and transfer knowledge.