Search

Genomic prediction (GP) using haplotypes is considered advantageous compared to GP solely reliant on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), owing to haplotypes’ enhanced ability to capture ancestral information and their higher linkage disequilibrium with quantitative trait loci (QTL). Many empirical studies supported the advantages of haplotype-based GP over SNP-based approaches. Nevertheless, the performance of haplotype-based GP can vary significantly depending on multiple factors, including the traits being studied, the genetic structure of the population under investigation, and the particular method employed for haplotype construction. In this study, we compared haplotype and SNP based prediction accuracies in four populations derived from European maize landraces. Populations comprised either doubled haploid lines (DH) derived directly from landraces, or gamete capture lines (GC) derived from crosses of the landraces with an inbred line. For two different landraces, both types of populations were generated, genotyped with 600k SNPs and phenotyped as lines per se for five traits. Our study explores three prediction scenarios: (i) within each of the four populations, (ii) across DH and GC populations from the same landrace, and (iii) across landraces using either DH or GC populations. Three haplotype construction methods were evaluated: 1. fixed-window blocks (FixedHB), 2. LD-based blocks (HaploView), and 3. IBD-based blocks (HaploBlocker). In within population predictions, FixedHB and HaploView methods performed as well as or slightly better than SNPs for all traits. HaploBlocker improved accuracy for certain traits but exhibited inferior performance for others. In prediction across populations, the parameter setting from HaploBlocker which controls the construction of shared haplotypes between populations played a crucial role for obtaining optimal results. When predicting across landraces, accuracies were low for both, SNP and haplotype approaches, but for specific traits substantial improvement was observed with HaploBlocker. This study provides recommendations for optimal haplotype construction and identifies relevant parameters for constructing haplotypes in the context of genomic prediction.

High-throughput genotyping of large numbers of lines remains a key challenge in plant genetics, requiring geneticists and breeders to find a balance between data quality and the number of genotyped lines under a variety of different existing genotyping technologies when resources are limited. In this work, we are proposing a new imputation pipeline ("HBimpute") that can be used to generate high-quality genomic data from low read-depth whole-genome-sequence data. The key idea of the pipeline is the use of haplotype blocks from the software HaploBlocker to identify locally similar lines and subsequently use the reads of all locally similar lines in the variant calling for a specific line. The effectiveness of the pipeline is showcased on a dataset of 321 doubled haploid lines of a European maize landrace, which were sequenced at 0.5X read-depth. The overall imputing error rates are cut in half compared to state-of-the-art software like BEAGLE and STITCH, while the average read-depth is increased to 83X, thus enabling the calling of copy number variation. The usefulness of the obtained imputed data panel is further evaluated by comparing the performance of sequence data in common breeding applications to that of genomic data generated with a genotyping array. For both genome-wide association studies and genomic prediction, results are on par or even slightly better than results obtained with high-density array data (600k). In particular for genomic prediction, we observe slightly higher data quality for the sequence data compared to the 600k array in the form of higher prediction accuracies. This occurred specifically when reducing the data panel to the set of overlapping markers between sequence and array, indicating that sequencing data can benefit from the same marker ascertainment as used in the array process to increase the quality and usability of genomic data.