1. Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study
- Author
-
Long H Nguyen, David A Drew, Mark S Graham, Amit D Joshi, Chuan-Guo Guo, Wenjie Ma, Raaj S Mehta, Erica T Warner, Daniel R Sikavi, Chun-Han Lo, Sohee Kwon, Mingyang Song, Lorelei A Mucci, Meir J Stampfer, Walter C Willett, A Heather Eliassen, Jaime E Hart, Jorge E Chavarro, Janet W Rich-Edwards, Richard Davies, Joan Capdevila, Karla A Lee, Mary Ni Lochlainn, Thomas Varsavsky, Carole H Sudre, M Jorge Cardoso, Jonathan Wolf, Tim D Spector, Sebastien Ourselin, Claire J Steves, Andrew T Chan, Christine M. Albert, Gabriella Andreotti, Bijal Bala, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Laura E. Beane-Freeman, John S. Brownstein, Fiona J. Bruinsma, Joe Coresh, Rui Costa, Annie N. Cowan, Anusila Deka, Sandra L. Deming-Halverson, Maria Elena Martinez, Michael E. Ernst, Jane C. Figueiredo, Pedro Fortuna, Paul W. Franks, Laura Beane Freeman, Christopher D. Gardner, Irene M. Ghobrial, Christopher A. Haiman, Janet E. Hall, Jae H. Kang, Brenda Kirpach, Karestan C. Koenen, Laura D. Kubzansky, James V. Lacey, Jr, Loic Le Marchand, Xihong Lin, Pam Lutsey, Catherine R. Marinac, Roger L. Milne, Anne M. Murray, Denis Nash, Julie R. Palmer, Alpa V. Patel, Eric Pierce, McKaylee M. Robertson, Lynn Rosenberg, Dale P. Sandler, Shepherd H. Schurman, Kara Sewalk, Shreela V. Sharma, Christopher J. Sidey-Gibbons, Liz Slevin, Jordan W.. Smoller, Claire J. Steves, Maarit I. Tiirikainen, Scott T. Weiss, Lynne R. Wilkens, Feng Zhang, and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard
- Subjects
Male ,01 natural sciences ,Occupational safety and health ,0302 clinical medicine ,COVID-19 Testing ,Health care ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Hazard ratio ,Articles ,Middle Aged ,Mobile Applications ,3. Good health ,Female ,Risk assessment ,Coronavirus Infections ,Incident report ,Cohort study ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,government.form_of_government ,Health Personnel ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Risk Assessment ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,Environmental health ,Humans ,0101 mathematics ,Personal protective equipment ,Pandemics ,Personal Protective Equipment ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Clinical Laboratory Techniques ,010102 general mathematics ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,COVID-19 ,United Kingdom ,United States ,Emergency medicine ,government ,Observational study ,Self Report ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
BackgroundData for frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection are limited and whether personal protective equipment (PPE) mitigates this risk is unknown. We evaluated risk for COVID-19 among frontline HCWs compared to the general community and the influence of PPE.MethodsWe performed a prospective cohort study of the general community, including frontline HCWs, who reported information through the COVID Symptom Study smartphone application beginning on March 24 (United Kingdom, U.K.) and March 29 (United States, U.S.) through April 23, 2020. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling to estimate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of a positive COVID-19 test.FindingsAmong 2,035,395 community individuals and 99,795 frontline HCWs, we documented 5,545 incident reports of a positive COVID-19 test over 34,435,272 person-days. Compared with the general community, frontline HCWs had an aHR of 11·6 (95% CI: 10·9 to 12·3) for reporting a positive test. The corresponding aHR was 3·40 (95% CI: 3·37 to 3·43) using an inverse probability weighted Cox model adjusting for the likelihood of receiving a test. A symptom-based classifier of predicted COVID-19 yielded similar risk estimates. Compared with HCWs reporting adequate PPE, the aHRs for reporting a positive test were 1·46 (95% CI: 1·21 to 1·76) for those reporting PPE reuse and 1·31 (95% CI: 1·10 to 1·56) for reporting inadequate PPE. Compared with HCWs reporting adequate PPE who did not care for COVID-19 patients, HCWs caring for patients with documented COVID-19 had aHRs for a positive test of 4·83 (95% CI: 3·99 to 5·85) if they had adequate PPE, 5·06 (95% CI: 3·90 to 6·57) for reused PPE, and 5·91 (95% CI: 4·53 to 7·71) for inadequate PPE.InterpretationFrontline HCWs had a significantly increased risk of COVID-19 infection, highest among HCWs who reused PPE or had inadequate access to PPE. However, adequate supplies of PPE did not completely mitigate high-risk exposures.FundingZoe Global Ltd., Wellcome Trust, EPSRC, NIHR, UK Research and Innovation, Alzheimer’s Society, NIH, NIOSH, Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen ReadinessRESEARCH IN CONTEXTEvidence before this studyThe prolonged course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, coupled with sustained challenges supplying adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) for frontline healthcare workers (HCW), have strained global healthcare systems in an unprecedented fashion. Despite growing awareness of this problem, there are few data to inform policy makers on the risk of COVID-19 among HCWs and the impact of PPE on their disease burden. Prior reports of HCW infections are based on cross sectional data with limited individual-level information on risk factors for infection. A PubMed search for articles published between January 1, 2020 and May 5, 2020 using the terms “covid-19”, “healthcare workers”, and “personal protective equipment,” yielded no population-scale investigations exploring this topic.Added value of this studyIn a prospective study of 2,135,190 individuals, frontline HCWs may have up to a 12-fold increased risk of reporting a positive COVID-19 test. Compared with those who reported adequate availability of PPE, frontline HCWs with inadequate PPE had a 31% increase in risk. However, adequate availability of PPE did not completely reduce risk among HCWs caring for COVID-19 patients.Implications of all the available evidenceBeyond ensuring adequate availability of PPE, additional efforts to protect HCWs from COVID-19 are needed, particularly as lockdown is lifted in many regions of the world.
- Published
- 2020