Search

Supplementary Tables 1-3, Figures 1-6. Supplementary Table 1: Statistical analysis of differences between the study group and the remaining group of patients for several variables. Supplementary Table 2: Primers used for the RT-qPCR assays. Supplementary Table 3: Leave-one-out cross-validation of the angiogenesis-associated and hypoxia gene signatures. Supplementary Figure 1: Average gene expression levels for the top 10-ranked angiogenesis signature calculated based on the microarray data (N = 42 patients) for low (Cluster A1), high (Cluster A2) and medium (Cluster A3) risk patients. Supplementary Figure 2: Average gene expression levels for the top 10-ranked hypoxia response signature calculated based on the microarray data (N = 42 patients). Supplementary Figure 3: Hierarchical clustering of top 10-ranked hypoxia-response genes significantly associated with TS, showing gene expression variation among patients. The heat map represents relative intensity values of gene expression levels. Supplementary Figure 4: Hierarchical clustering of top 10-ranked hypoxia-response genes significantly associated with OS, showing gene expression variation among patients. The heat map represents relative intensity values of gene expression levels. Supplementary Figure 5: Optimized between-group classification (OBC) sensitivity analysis for angiogenesis-associated signature (A) and hypoxia-response signature predictive of TTP under BE. Supplementary Figure 6: Association between the expression of 10-gene hypoxia-response signature predictive of TTP under BE in our study, and PFS of second line sorafenib-treated patients enrolled in the BATTLE-1 trial,1 GEO accession number: GSE33072;2 P = 0.0186, calculated by log-tank test.

Purpose: We aimed to identify gene expression signatures associated with angiogenesis and hypoxia pathways with predictive value for treatment response to bevacizumab/erlotinib (BE) of nonsquamous advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Experimental Design: Whole-genome gene expression profiling was performed on 42 biopsy samples (from SAKK 19/05 trial) using Affymetrix exon arrays, and associations with the following endpoints: time-to-progression (TTP) under therapy, tumor-shrinkage (TS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Next, we performed gene set enrichment analyses using genes associated with the angiogenic process and hypoxia response to evaluate their predictive value for patients' outcome.Results: Our analysis revealed that both the angiogenic and hypoxia response signatures were enriched within the genes predictive of BE response, TS, and OS. Higher gene expression levels (GEL) of the 10-gene angiogenesis-associated signature and lower levels of the 10-gene hypoxia response signature predicted improved TTP under BE, 7.1 months versus 2.1 months for low versus high-risk patients (P = 0.005), and median TTP 6.9 months versus 2.9 months (P = 0.016), respectively. The hypoxia response signature associated with higher TS at 12 weeks and improved OS (17.8 months vs. 9.9 months for low vs. high-risk patients, P = 0.001).Conclusions: We were able to identify gene expression signatures derived from the angiogenesis and hypoxia response pathways with predictive value for clinical outcome in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients. This could lead to the identification of clinically relevant biomarkers, which will allow for selecting the subset of patients who benefit from the treatment and predict drug response. Clin Cancer Res; 21(23); 5253–63. ©2015 AACR.See related commentary by Cascone and Heymach, p. 5188

OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer including single or multilevel N2 remains a matter of debate. Several trials demonstrate that selected patients benefit from surgery if R0 resection is achieved. We aimed to assess resectability and outcome of patients with locally advanced clinical T3/T4 (American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition) tumors after induction treatment followed by surgery in a pooled analysis of 3 prospective multicenter trials. METHODS A total of 197 patients with T3/T4 non-small cell lung cancer of 368 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research 16/96, 16/00, 16/01 trials were treated with induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapy followed by surgery, including extended resections. Univariable and multivariable analyses were applied for analysis of outcome parameters. RESULTS Patients' median age was 60 years, and 67% were male. A total of 38 of 197 patients were not resected for technical (81%) or medical (19%) reasons. A total of 159 resections including 36 extended resections were performed with an 80% R0 and 13.2% pathological complete response rate. The 30- and 90-day mortality were 3% and 7%, respectively, without a difference for extended resections. Morbidity was 32% with the majority (70%) of minor grading complications. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survivals for extended resections were 61% (95% confidence interval, 43-75), 44% (95% confidence interval, 27-59), and 29.5% (95% confidence interval, 13-48), respectively. R0 resection was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; P

The objectives were to describe patients' experiences of cancer care in Switzerland and explore the variation of these experiences by type of cancer. The Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) study was a cross-sectional, multicentre survey conducted in 2018. Adult patients (n = 7145) with breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, skin or haematological cancer from four large hospitals in French-speaking Switzerland were invited to complete a survey. Logistic regressions were used to assess whether experiences varied according to cancer type, adjusting for confounders. Of the 3121 persons who returned the survey (44% response rate), 2755 reporting an eligible cancer were included in the analyses. Participants' average score for overall care was 8.5 out of a maximum score of 10. Higher rates of positive experiences were found for nurse consultations (94%), diagnostic tests (85%) and inpatient care (82%). Lower positive responses were reported for support for people with cancer (70%), treatment decisions (66%), diagnosis (65%) and home care (55%). We observed non-systematic differences in experiences of care by cancer type. This large study identified that cancer patient experiences can be improved in relation to communication, information and supportive care aspects. Improvement efforts should target these areas of care to enhance responsiveness of cancer care.

PURPOSE The study aimed to investigate strategies to prevent and treat cetuximab-induced skin reactions and their perceived effectiveness in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS This open-label, prospective observational study was conducted in Switzerland. RESULTS A total of 125 patients were included (n = 91 mCRC, n = 34 SCCHN; mean age 63.3 years; 73.6% males). The frequency of acneiform rash grade ≥ 2 increased from 12.6% at week 2 to 21.7% at week 16. The proportion of patients who reported no skin reaction decreased from 75.6% at week 2 to 43.3% at week 16. The most frequently used skin products at any time of observation were moisturizing (77.6%), lipid-regenerating (56.8%) or urea-containing products (52%), systemic antibiotics (49.6%), and vitamin K1 cream (43.2%). There was no clear effectiveness pattern for all product classes: in given patients, either the product showed no effect at all or a moderate/strong effect, consistently over time. CONCLUSIONS A great variety of low-cost general skin care products were commonly used. According to physician's preference, systemic antibiotics and vitamin K1 cream are an appropriate approach to prevent or treat cetuximab-related skin toxicity.

Background First-line pembrolizumab monotherapy improves overall and progression-free survival in patients with untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumour proportion score (TPS) of 50% or greater. We investigated overall survival after treatment with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater. Methods This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was done in 213 medical centres in 32 countries. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without a sensitising EGFR mutation or ALK translocation and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1, life expectancy 3 months or longer, and a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater. Randomisation was computer generated, accessed via an interactive voice-response and integrated web-response system, and stratified by region of enrolment (east Asia vs rest of world), ECOG performance status score (0 vs 1), histology (squamous vs non-squamous), and PD-L1 TPS (≥50% vs 1-49%). Enrolled patients were randomly assigned 1:1 in blocks of four per stratum to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles or the investigator's choice of platinum-based chemotherapy for four to six cycles. Primary endpoints were overall survival in patients with a TPS of 50% or greater, 20% or greater, and 1% or greater (one-sided significance thresholds, p=0·0122, p=0·0120, and p=0·0124, respectively) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed sequentially if the previous findings were significant. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02220894. Findings From Dec 19, 2014, to March 6, 2017, 1274 patients (902 men, 372 women, median age 63 years [IQR 57-69]) with a PD-L1 TPS of 1% or greater were allocated to pembrolizumab (n=637) or chemotherapy (n=637) and included in the intention-to-treat population. 599 (47%) had a TPS of 50% or greater and 818 patients (64%) had a TPS of 20% or greater. As of Feb 26, 2018, median follow-up was 12·8 months. Overall survival was significantly longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the chemotherapy group in all three TPS populations (≥50% hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·56-0·85, p=0·0003; ≥20% 0·77, 0·64-0·92, p=0·0020, and ≥1% 0·81, 0·71-0·93, p=0·0018). The median surival values by TPS population were 20·0 months (95% CI 15·4-24·9) for pembrolizumab versus 12·2 months (10·4-14·2) for chemotherapy, 17·7 months (15·3-22·1) versus 13·0 months (11·6-15·3), and 16·7 months (13·9-19·7) versus 12·1 months (11·3-13·3), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 113 (18%) of 636 treated patients in the pembrolizumab group and in 252 (41%) of 615 in the chemotherapy group and led to death in 13 (2%) and 14 (2%) patients, respectively. Interpretation The benefit-to-risk profile suggests that pembrolizumab monotherapy can be extended as first-line therapy to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without sensitising EGFR or ALK alterations and with low PD-L1 TPS. Funding Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Background Breast cancer screening mammography is widespread in industrialised countries within the framework of public health program or opportunist form. Only few data exist on the comparison of effectiveness between organised and opportunistic screening. The aim of this study is to compare organised and opportunistic screening using population-based data from the Fribourg cancer registry, Switzerland. Methods We included all first primary breast adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 in women aged 50–69 years resident in the canton of Fribourg. We considered only breast cancer discovered by mammography screening. We compared patients, tumour characteristics and treatment modalities between breast cancer detected by the organised screening program versus opportunistic screening using logistic regression. Results Out of 989 patients diagnosed with breast cancer, 402 (40.6%) were diagnosed by organised and 205 (20.7%) by opportunistic screening. Women with breast cancer detected within the screening program were more likely to be from rural areas (P = 0.035) and lived less frequently in high favoured regions (P = 0.020). They presented more frequently in situ than invasive cancer (P = 0.022). For patients with invasive breast cancer, those detected by the program were less likely to undergo mastectomy (P = 0.06) and consequently, they were more likely to undergo radiation therapy (P = 0.003). Adjustment for area of residence and financial context of the region did not modify the results presented. Conclusions The present study reports an increased rate of detection of carcinoma in situ in organised screening program as compared to opportunistic screening mammographies, an indirect evidence of a higher radiologic sensitivity. Furthermore, the results show a trend towards more mastectomies among patients with breast cancer discovered after opportunistic than after organized mammography screening, reflecting lower treatment burden. Those results were independent of socio-economic factors which differed across screening groups.

BACKGROUND The Symptom Navi Program (SNP) is a nurse-led intervention supporting basic symptom self-management for patients with any cancer diagnosis. The SNP has been accepted by patients and healthcare professionals alike. OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to pilot the SNP and evaluate patient-reported symptom outcomes, nursing support for symptom management, and patient safety. METHODS Using a cluster-randomized design, we randomized centers to the intervention (SNP) or control group (usual care). Adult patients starting first-line systemic cancer treatment were included. The primary outcome was the change in symptom interference with daily functions from treatment onset to 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in symptom severity, symptom burden, self-efficacy, and perceived symptom management support and patient safety. We used linear and logistic mixed-effects models to pilot-test differences in mean changes between groups. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03649984). RESULTS Changes in symptom interference with daily functions did not differ (mean difference at 16 weeks: -0.50; 95% confidence interval, -1.38 to 0.38; P = 0.25) between SNP (3 centers, 49 patients) and control (5 centers, 85 patients) as for all other outcomes. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary findings did not indicate an effect of the SNP on patient-reported symptom outcomes, self-efficacy, or symptom management support. Inadequate power and SNP components (eg, insufficient training, low number of follow-up consultations) may be attributed to the lack of an observed effect. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The SNP training content and intervention procedures merit reconsideration.

Background: For patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy with three cycles of cisplatin and docetaxel followed by surgery has been shown to yield a 1-year event-free survival (EFS) rate of 48% and is an accepted standard of care. Neoadjuvant PD-(L)1 inhibitors can result in high response rates in resectable NSCLC. Methods: Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin 100 mg/m 2 and docetaxel 85 mg/m 2 q3w followed by two cycles of durvalumab 750 mg q2w. Adjuvant durvalumab was continued for 1 year after surgery. The primary endpoint was 1-year EFS. The hypothesis for statistical considerations was an improvement of 1-year EFS from 48% to 65%. This trial is registered with ClinicialTrials.gov, NCT02572843. Findings: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, 67 were included in the full analysis set. Radiographic response rate was 43·3% (95%CI: 31·2-56·0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (complete remission (CR): 2·9%, partial remission (PR): 40·3%, stable disease (SD): 44·8%) and 58·1% (95%CI: 44·8-70·5) after additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy (CR: 6·5%, PR: 51·6%, SD: 25·8%). Fifty-five patients were resected, of which 34 (61·8%) achieved a major pathological response (MPR; ≤10% viable tumour cells), and 10 (18·2%) amongst them a complete pathological response. Postoperative nodal down-staging (ypN0-1) was observed in 37 patients (67·3%). Fifty-one (92·7%) patients had an R0 resection. There was no significant effect of pre-treatment PD-L1 expression on MPR or nodal down-staging. In the entire study population, the 1-year EFS rate was 73·4% (90%CI: 62·7-81·5). Median EFS and overall survival were not reached after 28 months of median follow-up. Fifty-nine (88·1%) patients had an adverse event (AE) grade ≥3 including two fatal AEs that were not assessed to be treatment-related. Interpretation: This is thus far the largest report on perioperative PD-(L)1 inhibition in patients with resectable stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC. The addition of perioperative durvalumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and exceeds historical data of chemotherapy alone with a high MPR and an encouraging 1-year EFS rate of 73·4%. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicialTrials.gov, NCT02572843. Funding Statement: The study was supported by research agreements with the following institutions: Swiss State Secretary for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI), Swiss Cancer Research Foundation (SCS) and Swiss Cancer League (SCL). Research funding for translational research projects was granted by Gateway for Cancer Research and Rising Tide Foundation. AstraZeneca provided drug and financial support. Declaration of Interests: SIR: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. Research funding from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Merck. Support for travel and accommodations from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Roche, Takeda. Member of the Federal Drug Commission of the Federal Office of Public Health. AZ: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Hoffmann–La Roche, NBE Therapeutics, Secarna, ACM Pharma and Hookipa. Non-commercial research agreements with Hoffmann–La Roche, NBE Therapeutics, Secarna, ACM Pharma, Hookipa, and BeyondSpring. EIE: None SSP: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. DB: None AB: None MF: Research grants from Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Astra Zeneca (paid to the institution). Honoraria for advisory boards from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim and MSD. MJ: Research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche and Merck. DL: None HG: None LAM: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Takeda, Roche and MSD. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca and Roche. CB: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag and Boehringer-Ingelheim. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca and Takeda. WW: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Astra Zeneca SP: Personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Biocartis, grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, grants and personal fees from Clovis, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Debiopharm, personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from F. Hoffman - La Roche, personal fees from Foundations Medicine, grants and personal fees from Illumina, personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pharma Mar, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Regeneron, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Seattle Genetics, personal fees from Takeda, grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme, personal fees from Merck Serono, personal fees from Merrimack. MM: Honoraria for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, MSD, Roche and Takeda. Research grant (to the institution) from AstraZeneca. RC: Honoraria for advisory boards (all paid to the institution) from AstraZeneca, Astellas, MSD, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen-Cilag, Roche, Pfizer, Merck Serono, Ipsen and Bayer. AFO: None WDJ: None CW: None NM: None PF: Honoraria for advisory from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Boehringer-Ingelheim and BristolMyers Squibb. MB: None PB: None GG: None CR: None MG: Honoraria for advisory boards and consulting (all paid to the institution) from Astra-Zeneca. MP: Honoraria for advisory boards from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BristolMyers-Squibb, Eisai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and Merck. Speakers fee from Janssen-Cilag. Support for travel and accommodations from AstraZeneca, BoehringerIngelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb and Vifor. Ethics Approval Statement: The trial was done in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of each participating site. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Medical oncologists are steering a difficult course during the COVID-19 pandemic between three opposing forces : revisiting optimal standards of cancer care, facing constantly evolving shortages as some resources are being redirected, and acknowledging the paradoxical need to keep patients away from the health care facility. This article compiles recommendations fr om cancer societies and expert opinions to provide guidance and practical solutions for the oncology clinic. We propose that optimal standards of care be upheld, and short-term safety concerns due to exposure to SARS-CoV-2 be weighed against a long-term compromise in cancer prognosis when deciding on adjustments in cancer care. Proper mitigation strategies in the clinic and use of less resource-heavy but equivalent treatment alternatives often allow optimal cancer care. The magnitude of benefit of cancer treatments needs to be systematically considered.

Medical oncologists are steering a difficult course during the COVID-19 pandemic between three opposing forces : revisiting optimal standards of cancer care, facing constantly evolving shortages as some resources are being redirected, and acknowledging the paradoxical need to keep patients away from the health care facility. This article compiles recommendations fr om cancer societies and expert opinions to provide guidance and practical solutions for the oncology clinic. We propose that optimal standards of care be upheld, and short-term safety concerns due to exposure to SARS-CoV-2 be weighed against a long-term compromise in cancer prognosis when deciding on adjustments in cancer care. Proper mitigation strategies in the clinic and use of less resource-heavy but equivalent treatment alternatives often allow optimal cancer care. The magnitude of benefit of cancer treatments needs to be systematically considered.

Introduction: Receptor activator of NF-kB ligand stimulates NF-kB-dependent cell signaling and acts as the primary signal for bone resorption. Retrospective analysis of a large trial comparing denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone metastatic solid tumors suggested significant overall survival (OS) advantage for patients with lung cancer with denosumab (p = 0.01). The randomized open-label phase III SPLENDOUR trial was designed to evaluate whether the addition of denosumab to standard first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy improved OS in advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage IV NSCLC were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either chemotherapy with or without denosumab (120 mg every 3-4 wks), stratified by the presence of bone metastases (at diagnosis), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, and region. To detect an OS increase from 9 to 11.25 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.80), 847 OS events were required. The trial closed prematurely owing to decreasing accrual rate. Results: A total of 514 patients were randomized, with 509 receiving one or more doses of the assigned treatment (chemotherapy: 252, chemotherapy-denosumab: 257). The median age was 66.1 years, 71% were men, and 59% were former smokers. Bone metastases were identified in 275 patients (53%). Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.7 (7.6-11.0) months in the control arm versus 8.2 (7.5-10.4) months in the chemotherapy-denosumab arm (HR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.78-1.19; one-sided p = 0.36). For patients with bone metastasis, HR was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.77-1.35), whereas for those without, HR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.66-1.23). Adverse events grade 3 or greater were observed in 40.9%, 5.2%, 8.7% versus 45.5%, 10.9%, 10.5% of patients. Conditional power for OS benefit was less than or equal to 10%. Conclusions: Denosumab was well-tolerated without unexpected safety concerns. There was no OS improvement for denosumab when added to chemotherapy in the intention-to-treat population and the subgroups with and without bone metastases. Our data do not provide evidence of a clinical benefit for denosumab in patients with NSCLC without bone metastases. (C) 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

TO THE EDITOR: Treatment of proteasome inhibitor (PI)–refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is challenging, with response rates of only 15% to 35% being achieved with next-generation drugs such as pomalidomide, carfilzomib, and daratumumab, alone or in combination.[1][1][⇓][2]-[3][3] The oral HIV

Objective We developed 2 intensity levels of a complex intervention for interprofessional supportive care in cancer (IPSC-C) to facilitate resilience and reduce unmet supportive care needs. We aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of both intensity levels in routine practice. Methods In a randomized, noncomparative phase II trial, newly diagnosed patients received either low (LI-IPSC-C) or high (HI-IPSC-C) intensity interventions. Low-intensity-interprofessional supportive care in cancer (LI-IPSC-C) consisted of 3 electronic assessments of resilience, unmet supportive care needs, mood, and coping effort over 16 weeks with an immediate feedback to clinicians including tailored intervention recommendations to facilitate resilience and supportive care. High-intensity-interprofessional supportive care in cancer (HI-IPSC-C) added 5 structured consultations (face-to-face and telephone) provided by specialized nurses. Primary outcome was a change ≥5 in resilience score on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Secondary outcomes were unmet supportive care needs, mood, and coping effort. We assessed feasibility by clinician-provided tailored interventions as recommended and acceptability through qualitative interviews with clinicians and patients. Results In the LI-IPSC-C arm, 11 of 41, in the HI-IPSC-C arm 17 of 43, patients increased resilience scores by ≥5. Relatively more patients decreased unmet needs in HI-IPSC-C arm. Mood, in both arms, and coping effort, in HI-IPSC-C arm, improved meaningfully. Feasibility was limited for the LI-IPSC-C arm, mainly due to lack of time; acceptability was high in both arms. Conclusion Neither LI-IPSC-C nor HI-IPSC-C interventions reached the desired threshold. HI-IPSC-C showed positive effects on secondary outcomes and was feasible. Resilience as measured by the CD-RISC may not be the optimal outcome measure for this intervention.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as part of the primary therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) is standard practice. In contrast, the role of a second ASCT (ASCT2) and subsequent lenalidomide maintenance for relapsed disease remains unclear. In this study, we analysed 86 consecutive MM patients with a first relapse after prior ASCT receiving either a second ASCT or conventional chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 37.7 months since first relapse, 54 (62.8%) patients were still alive and 29 (33.7%) without progression. Sixty-one (71.0%) patients received ASCT2 and had better progression-free survival (PFS) (30.2 versus 13.0 mo; P = .0262) and overall survival (OS) rates (129.6 versus 33.5 mo; P = .0003) compared with 25 (29.0%) patients with conventional treatment. Patients relapsing later than 12 months after ASCT1 benefitted from a second ASCT with better PFS2 (P = .0179) and OS2 (P = .0009). Finally, lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT2 was associated with longer PFS (41.0 vs 21.6 mo; P = .0034) and better OS (not yet reached vs 129.6 mo; P = .0434) compared with patients without maintenance. Our data suggest that a second ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance given at first relapse in MM after prior ASCT are associated with better survival rates.

Chemotherapy with G-CSF is used to mobilize peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with plerixafor as a rescue strategy for poorly mobilizing patients. Preclinical studies suggested that the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam enhances the mobilization of CD34+ cells. In this single-center study, we evaluated whether adding meloxicam to chemotherapy/G-CSF mobilization increases peripheral hematopoietic CD34+ cell levels and reduces the need of using plerixafor. We prospectively compared two consecutive cohorts of MM patients in first remission mobilized with G-CSF and non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. The second cohort additionally received oral meloxicam. The cohorts comprised 84 patients without meloxicam (-M) and 66 patients with meloxicam (+M). Meloxicam was well tolerated and associated with similar hematologic engraftment after transplantation and equal survival rates. However, the meloxicam group had higher CD34+ cell levels on day 8 of the mobilization procedure (53 200 versus 35 600 CD34+ cells/mL; P=0.007), and fewer patients needed >1 collection day (+M: 6 (9%) patients versus -M: 16 (19%) patients; P=0.04). This resulted in reduced plerixafor administrations (+M: 7 (11%) patients versus -M: 18 (21%) patients; P=0.03) and less costs. Our data suggest that meloxicam enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic CD34+ blood cells in MM patients.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 23 October 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.234.

Introduction: Consolidation of first-line induction treatment in myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with 200 mg/m2 melphalan chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was established as standard of care three decades ago. However, definite cure in myeloma patients remains exceptional due to residual disease escaping intensive treatment, and almost all patients will ultimately relapse at earlier or later time points following ASCT. Thus, improving efficacy of HDCT in MM remains an unresolved issue. Methods: We performed a phase-II randomized trial comparing standard 200 mg/m2 Melphalan (Mel) HDCT to experimental HDCT treatment with 200 mg/m2 bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylating agent, given at days -4 and -3, combined with 200 mg/m2 melphalan split on days -2 and -1 at 100 mg/m2 (BenMel) before ASCT in MM pts. Patients had up to four cycles of first-line induction treatment with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. After ASCT, pts received lenalidomide maintenance treatment for two years. The primary endpoint was to show a 15% improvement of the rate of complete remission (sCR+CR) after HDCT with BenMel compared to Mel alone. MRD assessment from the bone marrow was performed by multiparameter flow cytometry after hematological engraftment following HDCT/ASCT. MRD negativity was defined as clonal plasma cells below 10(-5). Results: We randomized 120 myeloma pts (60 patients in each arm), with high-risk genetic abnormalities present in 21.3% of the patients. The median age was 63 years (range 35-74). The sCR/CR rate after ASCT before initiation of lenalidomide maintenance treatment was better in the BenMel arm compared to Mel alone (70.0% vs 51.7%; p=.039). The post-ASCT remission rates in detail were sCR 40.0% vs 31.7% (p=.341); CR 30.0% vs 20.0% (p=.205); VGPR 16.7% vs 33.3% (p=.035); and PR 13.3% vs 15.0% (p=.793). MRD negativity assessed in the bone marrow by flow cytometry was observed in 26 (45.6%) of the BenMel treated pts compared to 22 (37.9%) of the Mel pts. Median time until neutrophil engraftment was 11 days after BenMel vs 12 days after Mel (p=.096), and median time until platelet engraftment was 13 days in both arms (p=0.367); all pts had full engraftment of both cell lineages. Prolonged hospitalization duration was seen in BenMel pts (median 19 vs 18 days; p=.006) due to the longer BenMel treatment administration. Fully reversible acute renal insufficiency occurred in three (5%) BenMel pts compared to none of the Mel pts (p=.250). No treatment-related mortality was seen in both groups. ICU admissions were necessary in 3 pts (5%) in the BenMel group (ARDS, septic shock, pulmonary failure), and 2 Mel treated pts (3.3%; due to pulmonary failure and decompensated cardiomyopathy). The PFS rates at 12 months were 95% in BenMel pts and 91% in Mel treated pts (p=.551). OS at 12 months was 96% for both groups (p=.262), and median PFS and OS were not reached in both groups. Conclusions: Our data confirm that high-dose bendamustine combined with melphalan HDCT before ASCT in MM patients is safe and well tolerated. In particular, bendamustine-associated renal toxicity was manageable and reversible in all patients, and hematopoietic engraftment was comparable to standard melphalan HDCT. HDCT with BenMel improves the sCR/CR rate compared to standard melphalan alone. Thus, BenMel HDCT before ASCT warrants further investigation aiming to improve the long-term survival rates of MM patients, eventually combined with new maintenance strategies in the post-transplant period. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The emergence of immunotherapy has generated great enthusiasm in oncology improving the prognosis of pathologies such as melanoma, lung cancer, kidney cancer, bladder and head and neck cancers. This enthusiasm concerns also older patients in view of the good tolerance of immunotherapy in young people. However, advanced age is linked to changes in the immune system, called immunosenescence, which could have a negative impact on the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy treatment. Knowledge in terms of efficacy and tolerance is limited for geriatric patients, few being included in clinical studies. This article summarizes the experience of immunotherapy in large clinical trials. It appears that the immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective and well tolerated in the elderly.L’émergence de l’immunothérapie a engendré un grand enthousiasme en oncologie en améliorant le pronostic de pathologies telles que le mélanome et les cancers pulmonaires, rénaux, vésicaux et de la sphère ORL. Cet enthousiasme concerne aussi les patients âgés au vu de la bonne tolérance de l’immunothérapie chez les jeunes. Cependant, l’âge avancé est lié à des modifications du système immunitaire, appelées immunosénescence, qui pourraient avoir un impact négatif sur l’efficacité et la toxicité du traitement par immunothérapie. Les connaissances en termes d’efficacité et de tolérance restent limitées pour les patients gériatriques, inclus en petit nombre dans les études cliniques. Cet article résume l’expérience de l’immunothérapie dans les grands essais cliniques. Il apparaît que les inhibiteurs de points de contrôle immunitaire soient efficaces et bien tolérés chez le sujet âgé.

AIMS OF THE STUDY Iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) are important conditions affecting a large proportion of the general population, causing the patients physical and psychosomatic symptoms, particularly fatigue, and significantly affecting their quality of life. General practitioners (GPs) are frequently consulted with nonspecific symptoms due to the ID. However, little evidence is available to guide iron treatment. The aim of the Swiss Delphi study was to generate a broad consensual Swiss expert opinion in various therapeutic areas on diagnosis and treatment of ID/IDA and their practical implications. METHODS Specific statements regarding clinical relevance, practical diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and treatment were evaluated by Swiss experts in various therapeutic areas using the Delphi method. “Consensus” was defined as ≥80% agreement; the agreement of 50–79% was defined as “critical”, of

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) continues to be a critical part of the disease control in younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Current evidence suggests that an induction treatm...

INTRODUCTION High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas and multiple myeloma (MM), thereby improving DFS and OS. Relapse after HDCT/ASCT remains the major cause of death in patients with lymphomas or MM after melphalan-based HDCT. Dose-intensified bendamustine by replacing carmustine in the BEAM regimen (BeEAM) or by combining it with melphalan (BenMel) is a promising strategy to lower the relapse rates.Renal toxicity after BeEAM emerges as a major concern. METHODS We investigated renal toxicity in consecutive lymphoma patients treated with BeEAM and in consecutive MM patients treated with the same dose of 400 mg/m2 bendamustine (split into 200 mg/m2 on two consecutive days) together with full-dosed (200 mg/m2) melphalan. Patients with a history of renal impairment before HDCT were included. We assessed renal damage summarized as acute kidney injury (AKI) by measuring renal parameters on a daily basis starting from the first day of HDCT until the last day of hospitalization for HDCT/ASCT. AKI: rise of s-creatinine ≥26.5 μmol/L in 48 hours or increase to more than or equal to twofold compared to baseline s-creatinine within 7 days (Kidney Disease International Global Organization, KDIGO, criteria). Grading of AKI: KDIGO. Treatment-related AKI (rAKI): occurred within 10 days from the last administration of bendamustine; no relation to sepsis. Consequently, we defined as treatment-unrelated AKI (uAKI) all renal damage occurring because of sepsis or later than 10 days since the last administration of bendamustine. Statistical Analysis Subgroup differences: Chi-squared test, Fisher Exact test. IBM SPSS software version 21. RESULTS Patient characteristics and therapy regimen: 122 consecutive patients with lymphomas or MM who underwent high- dose bendamustine regimen before ASCT in 01/2013-06/2016. Factors related to rAKIOccurrence of rAKI: correlated (p60 years, previous AKI, cardiovascular comorbidities and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs. In addition, rAKI correlated (p=0.004) with cardiovascular complications during hospitalization; details of subgroups analysis: Table 2.No differences in the incidence of rAKI MM (n=7/15; 46.7%) and lymphoma patients (n=44/107; 41.1%), p=0.683. Acute kidney Injury related to High Dose Bendamustine is reversible and manageable • Acute kidney injury related to bendamustine (rAKI): in 51 patients (41.8%); completely reversible in n=50/51 (98.0%). • rAKI: mild to moderate in 90% of affected patients; did not increase TRM after ASCT. • 3/51 patients (5.9%) with rAKI required transient renal dialysis to enable recovery from renal damage, whereas approaches such as additional hydration were sufficient in the vast majority (n=48 with rAKI; 94.1% of this subgroup). • The median duration of rAKI was 7 days (range, 1-22). ­ According to Cox ZL et al., Adverse Drug Events during AKI and its recovery, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:1070-1078. CONCLUSION • Our data suggest that treatment-related acute renal toxicity is common in lymphoma and MM patients receiving dose-intensified bendamustine HDCT before ASCT. • However, renal impairment is reversible and manageable. • Our data identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for the development of renal damage following bendamustine-based HDCT. • Such patients should be strictly monitored during hospitalization, and a generous hydration strategy before, during and after administration of bendamustine is recommended. • Assessing the pre-transplant renal risk profile may help to identify those patients, which may not be candidates for bendamustine-based HDCT thereby avoiding prolonged hospitalization due to rAKI and eventual transient dialysis treatment. • Our results may contribute to design appropriate selection criteria for dose-intensified bendamustine as part of the conditioning regimens preceding HDCT/ASCT in lymphoma and MM patients.

Introduction: Long-term data on outcomes of operable stage III NSCLC are scarce. Methods: Individual patient data from 368 patients enrolled in one phase III and two phase II trials were pooled and outcomes after applying the eighth (denoted with an asterisk [*]) versus the sixth TNM staging edition were compared. Patients were treated with either preoperative radiotherapy following 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy (trimodal) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (bimodal). Results: With the sixth version, the 5- and 10-year survival rates were 38% and 28% for stage IIIA, respectively, and 36% and 24% for stage IIIB, respectively. Factors associated with improved 5-year overall survival were younger age, R0 resection, and pathologic complete remission (pCR) (p = 0.043, p < 0.001 and p = 0.009). With the eighth TNM staging version, 162 patients were moved from stage IIIA to IIIB*. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 41% and 29% for stage IIIA*, respectively, and 35% and 27% for stage IIIB* patients, respectively. There was no difference in the bi- versus trimodal group with regard to median overall survival (28 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 21-39 months] and 37 months [95% CI: 24-51 months], p = 0.9) and event-free survival (12 months [95% CI: 9-15 months] versus 13 months [95% CI: 10-22 months], p = 0.71). Conclusions: We showed favorable 10-year survival rates of 29% and 27% in stage IIIA* and IIIB*, respectively. Younger age, R0 resection, and pathologic complete response were associated with improved long-term survival. Outcomes using the sixth versus eighth edition of the TNM classification were similar in operable stage III NSCLC.

9016 Background: For patients (pts) with resectable stage IIIA(N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (chemo) with 3 cycles cisplatin (cis)/docetaxel (doc) followed by surgery is an accepted standard of care leading to a 1-year (yr) event-free survival (EFS) of 48% and a 5-yr overall survival (OS) of 37%. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have recently shown to lead to high response rates in resectable NSCLC. Methods: SAKK 16/14 is an open-label single-arm phase II study including 68 pts with resectable NSCLC stage IIIA(N2) (T1-3 N2 M0), irrespective of histological subtype, genomic aberrations or PD-L1 expression status. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 3 cycles of cis 100 mg/m2 and doc 85 mg/m2 q3w followed by 2 cycles of durvalumab 750 mg q2w. Durvalumab was continued after surgery q2w for 1 yr. The primary endpoint is EFS at 1 yr. The statistical hypothesis is to improve EFS at 1 yr from 48% based on the SAKK 16/00 study to 65%. Here, we report the primary endpoint and response data from 67 evaluable pts included in the study. Results: 68 pts were included from 06/16 to 01/19 and 67 pts (35 males, 32 females) were evaluable. Median age was 61 yrs (range, 41-74). 52 pts (77.6%) had a WHO PS of 0. 95.5% were current or former smokers. The majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma (55.2%) followed by squamous cell histology (32.8%). Clinical stage T1, T2 and T3 were present at diagnosis in 22.4%, 49.3% and 28.4%, respectively. 81.1% of pts underwent resection. The main reason for not undergoing surgery was disease progression (33.3%). Pneumonectomy was performed in 5 pts (9.1%), 43 pts underwent lobectomy and 7 pts bilobectomy. 30-day postoperative mortality was observed in one patient (1.8%). One patient died due to a bleeding complication after surgery most likely not related to neoadjuvant therapy. Radiographic response was 44.8% (95%CI: 32.6-57.4) after neoadjuvant chemo and 59.7% (95%CI: 46.4-71.9) after additional neoadjuvant immunotherapy. 1-yr EFS was 73.3% (90%CI: 62.5-81.4). Results for pathologic remission rate as well as correlation with PD-L1 status will be presented during the meeting. Conclusions: We report on treatment outcomes of the largest cohort of pts with resectable stage IIIA(N2) NSCLC receiving perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The addition of perioperative durvalumab to standard of care cis/doc is safe and leads to a high response rate and a very encouraging 1-yr EFS rate that appears substantially higher than with chemo alone. Clinical trial information: NCT 02572843.

«Krebserkrankungen – Fruhdiagnose, was, wie, wann?» lautete der Titel des zweiten Hauptreferats am Kongress 2018 der Jungen Hausarztinnen und -arzte Schweiz JHaS.

«Cancers – depistage, qui, comment et quand?», tel etait l’intitule du deuxieme expose principal du congres 2018 des Jeunes medecins de premier recours Suisses (JHaS).

BEAM with BCNU is commonly used for conditioning treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, pulmonary toxicity and availability issues associated with BCNU prompted us to evaluate bendamustine-replacing BCNU (BeEAM). We analyzed 39 lymphoma patients receiving BeEAM conditioning with 200 mg/m(2) bendamustine at days -7 and -6. The median duration until neutrophil recovery was 11 days, and 15 days for platelet recovery (>20 g/L). The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities comprised mucosal side effects (27 pts.). Pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient (2.5%), and one patient died of septic complications. The CR rate increased from 33% to 74% 100 days after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, progression and death each occurred in 11 patients (28%). Median progression-free and overall survival at 2 years were 69% and 72%. Our data suggest that BeEAM conditioning using bendamustine is safe and results in promising survival rates.

Background The aim was to evaluate quality of life (QoL), pain, and fatigue in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with different regimens after first-line docetaxel, as well as disease progression. Patients and Methods Patients with mCRPC having received first-line chemotherapy with docetaxel were eligible. Second-line treatment choice was at the discretion of the local investigator. All patients had regular assessments of QoL with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire, of fatigue with the Brief Fatigue Inventory, and of pain with the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form. The primary end point was QoL maintenance defined as having a maximum decrease in 2 functional domains of the FACT-P. Results One hundred thirty-eight patients were included in 36 oncology centers across Switzerland. QoL analysis was available for all patients (59 who received cabazitaxel; 79 who received other therapy [OT] including 75 who received abiraterone). No significant differences for any of the end points were found between groups. A numerically higher number of patients had QoL maintenance with OT (25 of 79 patients, 32%) compared with cabazitaxel (8 of 59 patients, 14%). QoL improvement was found in 20% of patients (12 of 59) who received cabazitaxel and 24% (19 of 79) who received OT. Mean FACT-P score did not change in a clinically relevant manner over time in either group. Pain was present in 70% of patients (96 of 138), and a pain response to treatment was noted in 22% (13 of 59) who received cabazitaxel and 29% (23 of 79) who received OT. A similar but minor improvement of fatigue was noted in both groups. Conclusion Some degree of QoL decrease was seen in most patients regardless of second-line treatment. No significant differences in QoL parameters between cabazitaxel or other second line treatments were found.

Background Pemetrexed and bevacizumab as single agents have been approved for maintenance therapy after platinum-based induction in patients with advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. It is currently unknown whether bevacizumab plus pemetrexed is superior to pemetrexed alone. Patients and Methods We conducted a nonrandomized phase II trial with 2 sequential cohorts. In the first cohort, 77 patients were treated with 4 cycles of cisplatin, bevacizumab, and pemetrexed every 3 weeks, followed by bevacizumab plus pemetrexed maintenance until progression. In the second cohort, we treated 52 patients without bevacizumab, using maintenance with pemetrexed alone. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), adverse events, and the treatment costs of the 2 cohorts were compared. Results The median PFS from the time of registration was 6.9 months in cohort 1 and 5.6 months in cohort 2. The ORR was 62.3% in cohort 1% and 44.2% in cohort 2. The PFS (hazard ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.0; P = .041) and ORR (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3; P = .049) were better in cohort 1 than in cohort 2. No OS difference was found (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6; P = .890) after a median follow-up period of 47 months for cohort 1 and 27 months for cohort 2. The rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was greater in cohort 1. The treatment costs per patient were on average 1.4 times greater for cohort 1. Conclusion The addition of bevacizumab increased the ORR and PFS, but not OS, in our nonrandomized trial. Furthermore, the addition of bevacizumab was associated with greater toxicity and higher costs.

Objectives Molecular subclassification of non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is essential to improve clinical outcome. This study assessed the prognostic and predictive value of circulating micro-RNA (miRNA) in patients with non-squamous NSCLC enrolled in the phase II SAKK (Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research) trial 19/05, receiving uniform treatment with first-line bevacizumab and erlotinib followed by platinum-based chemotherapy at progression. Materials and methods Fifty patients with baseline and 24h blood samples were included from SAKK 19/05. The primary study endpoint was to identify prognostic (overall survival, OS) miRNA's. Patient samples were analyzed with Agilent human miRNA 8x60K microarrays, each glass slide formatted with eight high-definition 60K arrays. Each array contained 40 probes targeting each of the 1347 miRNA. Data preprocessing included quantile normalization using robust multi-array average (RMA) algorithm. Prognostic and predictive miRNA expression profiles were identified by Spearman's rank correlation test (percentage tumor shrinkage) or log-rank testing (for time-to-event endpoints). Results Data preprocessing kept 49 patients and 424 miRNA for further analysis. Ten miRNA's were significantly associated with OS, with hsa-miR-29a being the strongest prognostic marker (HR=6.44, 95%-CI 2.39–17.33). Patients with high has-miR-29a expression had a significantly lower survival at 10 months compared to patients with a low expression (54% versus 83%). Six out of the 10 miRNA's (hsa-miRN-29a, hsa-miR-542-5p, hsa-miR-502-3p, hsa-miR-376a, hsa-miR-500a, hsa-miR-424) were insensitive to perturbations according to jackknife cross-validation on their HR for OS. The respective principal component analysis (PCA) defined a meta-miRNA signature including the same 6 miRNA's, resulting in a HR of 0.66 (95%-CI 0.53–0.82). Conclusion Cell-free circulating miRNA-profiling successfully identified a highly prognostic 6-gene signature in patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Circulating miRNA profiling should further be validated in external cohorts for the selection and monitoring of systemic treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Insertion of central venous port (CVP) catheter in the cancer population is associated with increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, trials have shown limited benefit of antithrombotic treatment to prevent catheter-related venous thrombosis. This prospective observational cohort study was designed to assess the incidence of VTE closely related to CVP implantation in patients with cancer and undergoing chemotherapy, and to identify a high risk subgroup of patients. Between February 2006 and December 2011, 1097 consecutive cancer patients with first CVP implantation were included. Catheter-related VTE were defined as deep venous thrombosis in the arm, with or without pulmonary embolism (PE), or isolated PE. The incidence of CVP-associated VTE was 5.9% (IC95 4.4–7.3%) at 3 months, and 11.3% (IC95 9.4–13.2%) at 12 months. The incidence of any VTE was 7.6% (IC95 6.0–9.3%) at 3 months, and 15.3% (IC95 13.1–17.6%) at 12 months. High Khorana risk score and lung cancer were significant predictors of 3 month VTE. In conclusion, this large cohort study of patients with first CVP catheter implantation confirms the high incidence of VTE associated with the CVP implantation and allow identifying high risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis.

Background Low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields (Tumor Treating Fields; TTFields) exhibit anti-mitotic activity in cancer cells. Promising preclinical data have led to a single arm phase I/II trial in NSCLC patients. Methods Forty-two inoperable stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) and IV NSCLC patients who had had tumor progression received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 iv q3w together with daily TTFields therapy until disease progression. The primary endpoint was time to “in-field” progression. Results Median age for all patients was 63 years, 76% had stage IV disease, 78% had adenocarcinoma and 17% had performance status of 2. The median time to in-field progression was 28 weeks and the median time to systemic progression was 22 weeks. Six patients (14.6%) had a partial remission (PR) and 20 had stable disease (SD) (48.8%). Median overall survival was 13.8 months and 1 year survival rate was 57%. There were no TTFields-related serious adverse events. Conclusions The combination of TTFields and pemetrexed as a second line therapy for NSCLC is safe and potentially more effective than pemetrexed alone. TTFields improved disease control within the treatment field and a phase III study is planned to further investigate its role as a novel treatment in NSCLC.

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is very distressing for a patient and may have an impact on treatment decisions. On docetaxel-based therapy, alopecia occurs in a substantial proportion of patients. We aimed to investigate whether two different methods of scalp cooling can prevent hair loss.In this open-label, prospective, nonrandomized trial, patients with solid tumors receiving docetaxel in a palliative setting were allocated according to patients' preference to short-term cooling (over 45 min postinfusion) with a Paxman PSC-2 machine (PAX), with cold cap (CC), or no cooling. The combined endpoint was alopecia World Health Organisation (WHO) III or IV or the necessity to wear a wig. Study identifier is Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01008774.Two hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the trial (128 patients PAX, 71 CC, and 39 no cooling). Number of cycles (median 4) and median docetaxel doses were similar across groups (55-60 mg/day on weekly therapy, 135-140 mg/day on 3-weekly therapy). Alopecia occurred with PAX, CC, and no cooling under 3-weekly docetaxel in 23, 27, and 74% and under weekly docetaxel in 7, 8, and 17%, respectively. Overall, cooling (PAX and CC combined) reduced risk of alopecia by 78% (hazard ratio 0.22; 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.41). CC and PAX prophylaxis led to the same degree of prevention of alopecia. Adverse events (AE) were reported in 5% (most frequently, sensation of cold), and 30 patients (13%) discontinued cooling measures after cycle 1.In this first comparison published to date, both PAX and CC offer efficacious protection against hair loss, in particular when docetaxel is administered in a 3-weekly interval.

Purpose This phase II trial aimed to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a first-line combination of targeted therapies for advanced non-squamous NSCLC: bevacizumab (B) and erlotinib (E), followed by platinum-based CT at disease progression (PD). Methods 103 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC were treated with B (15 mg/kg day 1 of each 21-day cycle) and E (150 mg daily) until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Upon PD patients received 6 cycles of CT (cisplatin/carboplatin and gemcitabine). The primary endpoint was disease stabilization rate (DSR) after 12 weeks of BE treatment. Results 101 patients were evaluable. Under BE, DSR at week 12 was 54.5%. 73 patients had at least stable disease (SD), including 1 complete remission and 17 partial responses (PR). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Median time to progression (TTP) under BE was 4.1 months. 62 patients started CT; 35 received at least 4 cycles (6 PR, 32 SD). At a median follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months. Conclusions First-line BE treatment followed by a fixed CT regimen at PD is feasible with acceptable toxicity and activity. In a non-squamous NSCLC population unselected for EGFR status, we found OS rates similar to standard CT.

BACKGROUND: Stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is usually thought to be unresectable, and is managed with chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. However, selected patients might benefit from surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this multicentre, phase II trial was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with technically operable stage IIIB NSCLC. METHODS: Between September, 2001, and May, 2006, patients with pathologically proven and technically resectable stage IIIB NSCLC were sequentially treated with three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin with docetaxel), immediately followed by accelerated concomitant boost radiotherapy (44 Gy in 22 fractions) and definitive surgery. The primary endpoint was event-free survival at 12 months. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00030810. FINDINGS: 46 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 60 years (range 28-70). 13 (28%) patients had N3 disease, 36 (78%) had T4 disease. All patients received chemotherapy; 35 (76%) patients received radiotherapy. The main toxicities during chemotherapy were neutropenia (25 patients [54%] at grade 3 or 4) and febrile neutropenia (nine [20%]); the main toxicity after radiotherapy was oesophagitis (ten patients [29%]; nine grade 2, one grade 3). 35 patients (76%) underwent surgery, with pneumonectomy in 17 patients. A complete (R0) resection was achieved in 27 patients. Peri-operative complications occurred in 14 patients, including two deaths (30-day mortality 5.7%). Seven patients required a second surgical intervention. Pathological mediastinal downstaging was seen in 11 of the 28 patients who had lymph-node involvement at enrolment, a complete pathological response was seen in six patients. Event-free survival at 12 months was 54% (95% CI 39-67). After a median follow-up of 58 months, the median overall survival was 29 months (95% CI 16.1-NA), with survival at 1, 3, and 5 years of 67% (95% CI 52-79), 47% (32-61), and 40% (24-55). INTERPRETATION: A treatment strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery is feasible in selected patients. Toxicity is considerable, but manageable. Survival compares favourably with historical results of combined treatment for less advanced stage IIIA disease. FUNDING: Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and an unrestricted educational grant by Sanofi-Aventis (Switzerland).

Summary Background In patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma undergoing a multimodality therapy, treatment toxicity may outweigh the benefit of progression-free survival. The subjective experience across different treatment phases is an important clinical outcome. This study compares a standard with an individual quality of life (QoL) measure used in a multi-center phase II trial. Patients and methods Sixty-one patients with stage I–III technically operable pleural mesothelioma were treated with preoperative chemotherapy, followed by pleuropneumonectomy and subsequent radiotherapy. QoL was assessed at baseline, at day 1 of cycle 3, and 1, 3 and 6 months post-surgery by using the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) and the Schedule for the Evaluation of Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW), a measure that is based on five individually nominated and weighted QoL-domains. Results Completion rates were 98% (RSCL) and 92% (SEIQoL) at baseline and 98%/89% at cycle 3, respectively. Of the operated patients (N = 45) RSCL and SEIQoL were available from 86%/72%, 93%/74%, and 94%/76% at months 1, 3, and 6 post-surgery. Average assessment time for the SEIQoL was 24 min compared to 8 min needed for the RSCL. Median changes from baseline indicate that both RSCL QoL overall score and SEIQoL index remained stable during chemotherapy with a clinically significant deterioration (change ≥ 8 points) 1 month after surgery (median change of −66 and −14 for RSCL and SEIQoL, respectively). RSCL QoL overall scores improved thereafter, but remained beneath baseline level until 6 months after surgery. SEIQoL scores improved to baseline-level at month 3 after surgery, but worsened again at month 6. RSCL QoL overall score and SEIQoL index were moderately correlated at baseline (r = .30; p ≤ .05) and at 6-month follow-up (r = .42; p ≤ .05) but not at the other time points. Conclusion The SEIQoL assessment seems to be feasible within a phase II clinical trial, but may require more effort from staff. More distinctive QoL changes in accordance with clinical changes were measured with the RSCL. Our findings suggest that the two measures are not interchangeable: the RSCL is to favor when mainly information related to the course of disease- and treatment is of interest.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced, incurable cancer receiving anticancer treatment often experience multidimensional symptoms. We hypothesize that real-time monitoring of both symptoms and clinical syndromes will improve symptom management by oncologists and patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter cluster-randomized phase-III trial, patients with incurable, symptomatic, solid tumors, who received new outpatient chemotherapy with palliative intention, were eligible. Immediately before the weekly oncologists' visit, patients completed the palm-based E-MOSAIC assessment (Edmonton-Symptom-Assessment-Scale, ≤3 additional symptoms, estimated nutritional intake, body weight change, Karnofsky Performance Status, medications for pain, fatigue, nutrition). A cumulative, longitudinal monitoring sheet (LoMoS) was printed immediately. Eligible experienced oncologists were defined as one cluster each and randomized to receive the immediate print-out LoMoS (intervention) or not (control). Primary analysis limited to patients having uninterrupted (>4/6 visits with same oncologist) patient-oncologist sequences was a mixed model for the difference in patients global quality of life (G-QoL; items 29/30 of EORTC-QlQ-c30) between baseline (BL) and week 6. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included all eligible patients. RESULTS: In 8 centers, 82 oncologists treated 264 patients (median 66 years; overall survival intervention 6.3, control 5.4 months) with various tumors. The between-arm difference in G-QoL of 102 uninterrupted patients (intervention: 55; control: 47) was 6.8 (P = 0.11) in favor of the intervention; in a sensitivity analysis (oncologists treating ≥2 patients; 50, 39), it was 9.0 (P = 0.07). ITT analysis revealed improvement in symptoms (difference last study visit-BL: intervention -5.4 versus control 2.1, P = 0.003) and favored the intervention for communication and coping. More patients with high symptom load received immediate symptom management (chart review, nurse-patient interview) by oncologists getting the LoMoS. CONCLUSION: Monitoring of patient symptoms, clinical syndromes and their management clearly reduced patients' symptoms, but not QoL. Our results encourage the implementation of real-time monitoring in the routine workflow of oncologist with a computer solution.

Background: The role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and unknown EGFR mutation status has recently been questioned. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with unknown EGFR mutation status and long-term response (LTR) to gefitinib in the Swiss Iressa expanded access program (EAP). We assessed patient characteristics, and performed Sanger sequencing and next generation sequencing on archived tumor tissue. We hypothesized that EGFR mutations are prevalent in patients with LTR. Results: Of 430 patients in the EAP, 18 (4%) fulfilled our definition of LTR, and 16 of them had archived tumor tissue. Patient characteristics were as expected for age, sex, and smoking history. Median duration of therapy was 38 months (range 24-142 months). Sanger sequencing revealed EGFR exon 18-21 mutations in 6 (38%) of the tumors. Next generation sequencing revealed no further EGFR-mutated cases, but reported in 15 (94%) of the tumors mutations in other genes (ALK, BRAF, DDR2, KEAP1, MET, PTEN, STK11) previously associated with NSCLC. Conclusion: Larger studies are needed to define the prognostic values of different driver mutations in patients with NSCLC.