6 results on '"Dani Rob"'
Search Results
2. Multi-year patterns in scarring, survival and residency of whale sharks in Ningaloo Marine Park, Western Australia
- Author
-
Holly C. Raudino, Mark G. Meekan, Emily Lester, Kelly Waples, Peter Barnes, Conrad W. Speed, and Dani Rob
- Subjects
Mark and recapture ,Fishery ,Geography ,Ecology ,biology ,Whale ,biology.animal ,Photo identification ,Marine park ,Aquatic Science ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Predation - Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Using an Electronic Monitoring System and Photo Identification to Understand Effects of Tourism Encounters on Whale Sharks in Ningaloo Marine Park
- Author
-
Emily Lester, Holly C. Raudino, Conrad W. Speed, Kelly Waples, Peter Barnes, and Dani Rob
- Subjects
Fishery ,Geography ,biology ,Whale ,Ecotourism ,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management ,biology.animal ,Geography, Planning and Development ,Photo identification ,Monitoring system ,Marine park ,Tourism - Abstract
In-water shark-based tourism is growing worldwide and whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) are one of the most popular targets of this industry. It is important to monitor tourism industries to minimize any potential impacts on target species. At Ningaloo, Western Australia, Electronic Monitoring Systems (EMS) have been installed on licensed tour vessels to collect information on encounters between snorkelers and whale sharks. This study combined data from the EMS with whale shark identification photographs, to assess the impact of in-water tourism on the encounter duration for individual sharks. During 2011 and 2012, 948 encounters with 229 individual sharks were recorded using EMS. Encounter durations between whale sharks and tourism vessels ranged between 1 and 59 min (mean = 11 min 42 s, SD = ±11 min 19 s). We found no evidence for a decline in encounter duration after repeated tourist encounters with individual sharks. Encounter duration varied among tourism operator vessels and were shorter when the sex of the whale shark could not be identified. Given that individual sharks were swum with on average 2.4 times per day (±SD 2.08), and up to 16 times over the course of the study, our results suggest that there is no evidence of long-term impacts of tourism on the whale sharks at Ningaloo. However, the inclusion of well-defined categories of whale shark behaviors and information regarding how interactions between tourists and whale sharks end will complement the data already collected by the EMS. This preliminary investigation demonstrates the potential for the EMS as a data resource to better understand and monitor the impacts of tourism interactions on whale sharks.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Undersea Constellations: The Global Biology of an Endangered Marine Megavertebrate Further Informed through Citizen Science
- Author
-
Clare E. M. Prebble, Michael L. Berumen, Dení Ramírez-Macías, Jonathan A. Green, Steffen S. Bach, Rafael Parra, Alex Hearn, Stephen J. Beatty, Robert E. Hueter, Abraham Vázquez, Gonzalo Araujo, Alessandro Ponzo, Samantha D. Reynolds, Simon J. Pierce, Rachel T. Graham, Richard Rees, Marie Levine, Dani Rob, David Rowat, Beatriz Galvan, Bradley M. Norman, David David, Christoph A. Rohner, David Acuna, Matthew Potenski, Steve Fox, Alistair D. M. Dove, Zaven Arzoumanian, David P. Robinson, Adrian C. Gleiss, David L. Morgan, Jason Holmberg, Eric R. Hoffmayer, Elson Aca, Alan Duncan, Jennifer V. Schmidt, Jennifer A. McKinney, and Rory P. Wilson
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,education.field_of_study ,biology ,Ecology ,010604 marine biology & hydrobiology ,Population ,Online database ,Endangered species ,Whale shark ,biology.organism_classification ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Ecotourism ,Photo identification ,Citizen science ,Flagship species ,General Agricultural and Biological Sciences ,education - Abstract
The whale shark is an ideal flagship species for citizen science projects because of its charismatic nature, its size, and the associated ecotourism ventures focusing on the species at numerous coastal aggregation sites. An online database of whale shark encounters, identifying individuals on the basis of their unique skin patterning, captured almost 30,000 whale shark encounter reports from 1992 to 2014, with more than 6000 individuals identified from 54 countries. During this time, the number of known whale shark aggregation sites (hotspots) increased from 13 to 20. Examination of photo-identification data at a global scale revealed a skewed sex-ratio bias toward males (overall, more than 66%) and high site fidelity among individuals, with limited movements of sharks between neighboring countries but no records confirming large, ocean basin-scale migrations. Citizen science has been vital in amassing large spatial and temporal data sets to elucidate key aspects of whale shark life history and demographics and will continue to provide substantial long-term value.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Managing the impacts of tourism on the Ningaloo whale shark aggregation – asking the right people the right questions
- Author
-
Peter Barnes and Dani Rob
- Subjects
Fishery ,Geography ,biology ,Whale ,biology.animal ,Photo identification ,Agency (sociology) ,Wildlife ,Wildlife management ,Whale shark ,biology.organism_classification ,Recreation ,Tourism - Abstract
Background The Department of Parks and Wildlife manages the whale shark tourism industry within the Ningaloo Coast World Heritage Area, Western Australia. Guided by the Wildlife Management Program no. 57, Whale shark management with particular reference to Ningaloo Marine Park, the Department licences and monitors the activity of 15 commercial tour operators. A key strategy in the Management Program is to continue to research and monitor the impacts of whale shark interaction tourism on whale sharks in Ningaloo Marine Park, providing an on-going challenge. Approach This presentation will discuss the utility of the various approaches taken by both the Department and researcher activity licensed by the Department. These include the use of electronic monitoring systems on board the commercial tour operators' vessels which document encounter duration, photo identification of whale sharks, aerial behavioural monitoring and archival, acoustic and satellite tagging. Results As a management agency, the Department has identified a number of questions as outlined in the Management Program that aim to determine the level of impact on whale sharks. Potential impacts on whale sharks can arise from a number of anthropogenic sources including tourist vessels, recreational vessels and research activity. Finding the appropriate methodology to answer these questions is the key. Encounter duration is useful for determining short-term intra-season impacts. Photo identification catalogues combined with satellite tagging have been useful for determining longer-term inter-season return rates. Acoustic tagging will reveal patterns of residency while archival tagging has the potential to allow detailed behavioural studies. Photo identification also allows the analysis of scarring and potential impact on survival of the whale sharks visiting Ningaloo Marine Park and where possible can attribute scars to anthropogenic sources. Aerial monitoring of whale shark behaviour allows us to study whale shark swimming behaviours and direction in the presence and absence of vessels and swimmers. Conclusions Understanding and managing the impacts on whale sharks is a complex, challenging task. A single method cannot determine disturbance level on whale sharks. Determining which approach is appropriate to the given question and drawing upon the expertise of others to make informed management decisions is paramount and we will continue to take a multidisciplinary approach.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Understanding constellations: The use of ‘citizen science’ to elucidate the global biology of a threatened marine mega-vertebrate
- Author
-
Dení Ramírez-Macías, David Rowat, Alessandro Ponzo, Beatriz Galvan, Jason Holmberg, Alex Hearn, Jennifer A. McKinney, Eric R. Hoffmayer, Rory P. Wilson, Dani Rob, David Acuna, Simon Pierce, Gonzalo Araujo, Jennifer V. Schmidt, Samantha D. Reynolds, Robert E. Hueter, David L. Morgan, Zaven Arzoumanian, Rachel T. Graham, Marie Levine, Alistair D. M. Dove, Abraham Vázquez, Steve Fox, Richard Rees, Rafael Parra, Michael L. Berumen, Adrian C. Gleiss, David P. Robinson, Matthew Potenski, Jonathan A. Green, Bradley M. Norman, Steffen S. Bach, David David, Christoph A. Rohner, Alan Duncan, and Elson Aca
- Subjects
Geography ,biology ,Ecotourism ,Ecology ,Whale ,Ecology (disciplines) ,biology.animal ,Threatened species ,Photo identification ,Citizen science ,Identification (biology) ,Whale shark ,biology.organism_classification - Abstract
Background Gathering data on the life of enigmatic animals remains a challenge, despite its important role in biodiversity conservation and management. For many species, biogeographic investigations are largely the result of information that is generated from multiple sources, often over long time-scales, because measuring biogeographic and biological data over large geographic areas is simply not feasible by a single team of researchers. But in the current age of a well-educated public and accessible and mobile digital technology, scientists are now able to harness the observations of many, thus infinitely increasing their power of observation. Despite its status as the world's largest fish, there remains a paucity of information on the biology and ecology of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus). This species is however a prime target for ‘citizen science’ monitoring because of its charismatic nature, presence at many coastal aggregation sites and the growth of ecotourism around this species. Approach Information on whale shark sightings worldwide can be gathered by various stakeholders and stored in the Wildbook for Whale Sharks (www.whaleshark.org) database. Whale shark identification images are collected when a swimmer photographs the individual's unique spot pattern immediately behind the gill slits, which is distinct and long-lasting, and this image (with associated sighting data and information on shark size and sex) is then submitted to the online database. Computer-assisted scanning technology is then employed to determine whether the individual whale shark in question is a ‘new’ shark or a ‘resight’ of a previously reported whale shark within the database. Wildbook can then be queried to gain insights on various aspects of whale shark biology and ecology from data available at the various global hotspots. Results Members of the public and researchers alike contributed in this collaborative citizen science project enabling (as of 31 December 2014) almost 30000 whale shark encounter reports, comprising 6300+ individuals from 54 countries, to be identified. The number of recognized global aggregation sites (constellations) has increased from 13 to 20. The majority of these (14 out of 20) show a marked sex-ratio bias towards males (>66%). Site fidelity is relatively high, with an overall mean percentage of sharks returning to the 20 hotspots in two or more years of 35.7% (to a maximum of 21 years). Despite photo-identification revealing movements of sharks between a number of neighbouring countries/regions, there are no records confirming large, ocean basin-scale migrations. Strong seasonality in sightings is evident at many locations, suggesting that in general, that these aggregations are frequently exploiting known coastal feeding opportunities. Conclusions This study demonstrates the utility of citizen science in amassing large datasets and their utility in elucidating key aspects of whale shark life-history and demographics.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.